1 / 2100%
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k 1
Afterk reviewingk thisk studyk therek werek ak couplek ofk strengthsk thatk stoodk out.k First,k thek
articlesk citedk werek relevantk tok thek study,k whichk madek thek discussionk sectionk easyk tok
understand.k Secondly,k thek tablek andk figurek usedk arek easyk tok readk andk correctlyk changedk
fromk colork tok grayscalek ask statedk ink Sectionk 7.26k ink thek APAk manual(Americank
Psychologicalk Association,k 2020).
k Therek wask alsok ak fewk errors,k statedk below,k thatk cank bek easilyk fixedk byk thek author.
1.k Thek referencek sectionk shouldk startk withk ak newk pagek breakk bringingk thek referencek titlek tok
thek topk ofk thek pagek insteadk ofk thek middlek ask statedk ink Sectionk 2.12k ink thek APAk manualk
(Americank Psychologicalk Association,k 2020).
2.k Figurek 1k shouldk bek calledk outk withink thek textk ork citedk ask statedk ink Sectionk 7.5k ofk thek
APAk manual,k insteadk itk isk randomlyk statedk makingk itk confusingk withk howk thek figurek isk
relatedk tok thek textk (Americank Psychologicalk Association,k 2020).
3.k Thek resultsk sectionk shouldk comek beforek thek discussionk section,k followingk thek layoutk
describedk ink thek videok presentationk fork thisk weekk (St.k Peters,k M.,k 2021).
Afterk reviewingk yourk study,k Ik wask ablek tok findk somek strengthsk regardingk yourk study.k Thek
firstk strengthk wask thatk thek articlesk thatk youk sharedk withink yourk studyk werek relevantk andk
helpfulk whilek discussingk thek relationshipk betweenk religion,k anxiety,k andk depression.k Thek
articlesk enhancedk yourk studyk fromk thek surveyk resultsk andk helpedk createk ak strongk discussion.k
Thek secondk strengthk wask thatk yourk tablek andk figurek werek easyk tok readk andk understand.k
However,k Ik didk stumblek acrossk tok findk somek errorsk withink yourk study.k Thek firstk errork wask
thatk Ik didk notk seek thatk youk calledk outk thek figurek withink yourk textk basedk onk thek APAk
manual.k Duek tok thek figurek notk beingk mentionedk withink thek text;k itk appearsk confusingk
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k 2
becausek thek figurek isk notk discussedk withink thek paragraphsk thatk correlatek thek studyk together.k
Therefore,k Ik wouldk suggestk writingk ak fewk sentencesk thatk discussk thek figurek andk correlatek
withk yourk discussion.k Thek secondk errork thatk Ik foundk wask thatk therek werek ak fewk grammark
errorsk whenk discussingk thek percentagesk amongk thek participants.k Ik wouldk suggestk rewritingk
thek percentagesk tok flowk appropriatelyk withink yourk discussionk andk checkingk thek APAk manualk
tok correctk thesek sentences.k Thek thirdk errork thatk Ik foundk wask thek resultsk sectionk shouldk
appeark beforek thek discussion.k Ik wouldk suggestk lookingk overk thek layoutk basedk onk thek videok
presentationk tok appropriatelyk correctk thek layoutk ofk thek paperk
References
Americank Psychologicalk Association.k (2020).k Publicationk manualk ofk thek Americank
Psychologicalk Associationk 2020:k Thek officialk guidek tok APAk stylek (7thk ed.).k Americank
Psychologicalk Association.
St.k Peters,k M.k (2021,k Novemberk 10).k Scientifick writing:k resultsk andk discussionk [Video].k
Libertyk University.k https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/336469/pages/watch-scientific-writing-
results-and-discussion?module_item_id=25799373
Students also viewed