1 / 6100%
Running head: SPIRITUALITY AND JOB SATISFACTION IN THE WORKPLACE
1
Results
Descriptive statistics were carried out for this section.
Frequencies
Frequency statistics were used for the sex variable because the data was a
categorical variable. Therefore, descriptive statistics would not have been helpful as the
categories are not ordered.
Table 1
k k k k k k k k k k k k k Statistics
Sex
N
Valid
Missing
20
0
This table indicates that the total number of participants involved in the study was 20,
with no missing information.
Table 2
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k Sex
Frequency
Valid
Presentation
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Female
Male
10
10
50.0
50.0
50.0
100.0
Running head: SPIRITUALITY AND JOB SATISFACTION IN THE WORKPLACE
2
Total
20
100.0
From the output above, male participants were ten and female participants, each
representing 50% of the participants in the study.
Descriptive Analysis
Descriptive analyses of the age variable indicated that the youngest participant was
18 years old while the oldest was 56 years. The mean age of the sample was M = 40.25,
SD = 12. 62 years.
Hypothesis Testing
In the current section, statistical analyses were used to test the significance of the
relationship between job satisfaction and spirituality. The study projected a significant
positive relationship between job satisfaction and spirituality based on the reviewed
literature. A simple regression was the appropriate statistical test since the dependent (job
satisfaction) and the independent (spirituality) were quantitative variables.
Table 3
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
Job satisfactory
68.50
16.195
20
spirituality
90.70
26.232
20
Table 3 above shows the descriptive summary of the independent and dependent
variables of the study. Mean Job satisfaction was M – 68.50, SD = 16.20. On the other
hand, the mean spirituality among the participants was M =90.70, SD = 26.23.
Running head: SPIRITUALITY AND JOB SATISFACTION IN THE WORKPLACE
3
Table 4
Model Summary
Mod
el
R
R
Square
Adjusted
R Square
Std. The
error in
the
Estimate
1
.642a
.412
.379
12.758
a. Predictors: (Constant), spirituality
Table 5 above summarizes the goodness of fit of the regression model. The model had a
coefficient of R2 = 0.412, which indicated the model accounted for 41.2% variation in job
satisfaction. The coefficient correlation suggests a moderate positive relationship between
job satisfaction and spirituality. An increase in spirituality with one score led to a 0.642
increase in job satisfaction. k
Table 5
ANOVA
Model
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
1
Regression
2053.109
1
2053.109
12.613
.002b
Residual
2929.891
18
162.772
Total
4983.000
19
Table 4 above shows ANOVA for the regression model. The result of the ANOVA
suggests that spirituality is a significant predictor of job satisfaction, F (1,18) = 12.61, p =
0.02, at a 0.05 level of significance. Therefore, there is enough evidence to reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that the level of spirituality is significant in determining job
satisfaction among workers.
Table 6
Coefficients
Running head: SPIRITUALITY AND JOB SATISFACTION IN THE WORKPLACE
4
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
32.558
10.515
3.096
.006
spirituality
.396
.112
.642
3.552
.002
a. Dependent Variable: Job satisfactory
Table 5 above shows a summary of the model coefficients. The model suggests that
the job satisfaction score for absolutely non-spiritual individuals was M = 32.56, SE =
10.52. Job satisfaction increased by 0.396 for each unit increase in spirituality. The table
also indicates the significance of spirituality in predicting jobs satisfaction.
Discussion
The study described above used a sample of ten male and ten female participants to
investigate the relationship between spirituality and job satisfaction. The study used
regression analyses to evaluate the significance of spirituality in predicting job satisfaction.
The regression results indicated that spirituality predicted job satisfaction significantly and
accounted for 41.2% of the variation in job satisfaction.
The study results align with Dennis et al. (2003), who found a positive and
significant correlation between religiousness and job satisfaction in a multinational study
that included participants from 38 countries. The study noted that religious workers view
their work as a service to others, leading to a higher satisfaction level. The result of the
current study is also supported by Horvath (2015), who found that religious bank CEOs
were more satisfied with their work than non-religious CEOs. The study attributed the
positive correlation to the trust levels cultivated by spiritual leaders leading to better job
performance and, ultimately, job satisfaction. Finally, the results are backed by Koenig and
Bussing's (2010) findings. Their study found that job satisfaction mediated the relationship
Running head: SPIRITUALITY AND JOB SATISFACTION IN THE WORKPLACE
5
between spirituality and health outcomes. Koenig and Bussing's study found evidence
suggesting that spiritual workers exhibited better physical outcomes, including BMI than
non-spiritual workers. The study further found that the relationship was mediated by
satisfaction.
While the study found a significant relationship between spirituality and satisfaction,
its results are limited by scales used to measure the variables. There were no tests to
establish the relationship between the validity and reliability of the measures. Therefore,
there is a chance that the scales do not measure the intended attributes of spirituality and
job satisfaction.
The current study results have implications for managers and business owners
worldwide. The study suggests that job satisfaction can be improved by spiritual practice.
Given the importance of job satisfaction in improving job efficiency, managers can
encourage spirituality to improve job satisfaction. The study suggests a similar study to
investigate the relationship between spirituality and mental health outcomes. The research is
imperative due to the growing number of mental health patients worldwide.
Running head: SPIRITUALITY AND JOB SATISFACTION IN THE WORKPLACE
6
References
Dennis, D., & Dennis, B. (2003). [email protected]. American Journal Of Health k k
k k k k k k k Education, 34(5),297-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2003.10603566
Horvath, M. (2015). Predicting Work Outcomes from Religiosity and Perceived Calling.
The k k k k k Career Development Quarterly, 63(2), 141-155.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12010
Koenig, H. G., & Bussing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): a
five-item measure used in epidemiological studies. Religions, 1(1), 78-85
Students also viewed