THE INFLUENCE OF CONTEXT ON PROTEST PARTICIPATION
Introduction
The context in which a protest event takes place heavily shapes who participates,
why they participate, and how they get mobilized to participate.
Comparative research designs make it possible to reveal how the micro-level
participation of individuals links to the macro-level sociopolitical context.
Such comparisons can be made across different issues, movements, time periods,
and geographic/national contexts (spaces).
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Comparing Protest Participation Across Space, Time, and Movements
Cross-national comparisons of similar protests reveal strong variation in the size,
composition, and motivations of participants based on context.
Comparing protests on different issues shows how the demographics, attitudes, and
motivations of protesters shift based on the issue.
Time comparisons let researchers examine cycles of mobilization and demobilization
within movements over their lifespan.
Understanding the Role of Sociopolitical Context
Relevant Socioeconomic Factors
Economic prosperity gives people more resources to enable participation, but
inequality heightens grievances that spur protest.
Relevant Political Factors
The political system type (democracy level) and openness of institutions shape the
opportunities available for protest.
Perceived corruption reduces efficacy but also heightens grievances, causing complex
protest effects.
Relevant Cultural Factors
Democratic cultural values and norms encourage elite-challenging political
participation.
Social trust facilitates mobilization by enabling cooperative activity.
Protest Participation and Party Politics
Movement politics and party politics offer two routes for citizens to wield political
influence.
The mobilization potential available differs between the electoral/party arena and
protest/movement arena.
There is increasing interplay observed between social movements and election
campaigns.
Lessons from a Comparative Study
A multi-country study revealed different grievances and readiness to protest
between new and old democracies.
Among new democracies, post-authoritarian citizens are generally more politically
active than post-communist ones.
Views on immigration diverge: it mobilizes citizens in old democracies more than
those in new ones.
More than actual context, people's perceived world heavily impacts their
participation.
Conclusion
Context dynamically shapes the demand for protest, supply of opportunities, and
mobilization processes.
The perceived world matters even more than objective contextual factors in driving
behavior.
Thoughtful comparative designs reveal how macro-level sociopolitical contexts link to
micro-level participation.