Introduction
A wise man once remarked, “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a
man’s character, give him power” (Reuters, 2021). This quote underscores the resilience required
to overcome challenges and the true test of character that comes with wielding power and
authority. In the United States, power and authority are distributed across three levels of
government: federal, state, and local. Each level is tasked with providing services, implementing
programs, and enforcing mandates. This case study seeks to explore various leadership styles and
examine their influence on interpersonal skills and the delivery of public services. It will focus
specifically on leaders in the state of Texas and their advocacy for the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality. The paper will begin with an exploration of relevant leadership theories,
followed by a comprehensive analysis of the case, and will conclude with a summary of
government leadership responsibilities
Leadership Skills and Theory
As a nation, American’s are highly involved in the political interest and seek leaders with
good intentions. “Those who do choose to run for office are strongly enough motivated to
compensate for whatever hardships they might anticipate,” (Van Horn, 2010 p. 32).
State government leaders follow the footsteps of federal leaders to honor and promote a
stewardship of public trust and commitment to public good. (Partnership for public service,
2025). They should strive to acquire personal and professional development skillsets on their role
modeling, communication, intellectual stimulation, confidence, and empowerment within
government roles and platforms.
There are two predominant theories that have emerged and offer contrasting yet complementary
perspectives on effective leadership: transformational and transactional leadership.
Understanding these theories is essential for analyzing leadership dynamics, particularly in
complex organizational settings such as government and public service.
“Transformation leaders motivate behavior by changing their followers’ attitudes and
assumptions,” (Wright & Pandey, 2010 p.76). By focusing on selfless motivation tactics, this
leadership theory embodies leaders who are often characterized by their ability to articulate a
compelling vision, foster an environment for change and innovation, and provide individualized
consideration to their followers. This type of leadership is essential for government leaders to
build trust between organizations and showcase confidence in their ability to lead and inspire the
public sector.
“Transactional leadership is a leadership style that utilizes rewards and punishments to motivate
and direct followers,” (Cherry, 2022 para 1). Unlike transformational leadership, this method
defines roles and the efficient completion of tasks. Transactional leaders focus on setting goals,
monitoring progress, and ensuring that organizational objectives are met through a series of
exchanges or transactions. They are perceived as more managerial and effective in maintaining
stability and achieving short-term goals through established procedures and expectations. These
practices are necessary for elected officials to strengthen protocols and focus on policy
objectives.
Another practice of stewardship in biblical doctrine is the method of servant leadership. “Servant
leadership is an approach to leadership where the leader puts the needs of others before their
desires and acts as a servant first,” (Colorado Christian University, 2025 para 1). Jesus
exemplified the essence of serving others through his deep community involvement and
compassion to empower those around him.
“He showed care and concern for those sick, oppressed, or rejected by society. Matthew 9:36
says, "When he saw the crowds, he had compassion on them, because they were harassed and
helpless, like sheep without a shepherd,” (Colorado Christian University, 2025 para 5).
Motivated by the community's lack of resources, he was inspired to act selflessly, providing
food, clothing, and care for those in need.
By examining state leaders’ role in both transformational, transactional, and servant leadership,
we can gain a comprehensive understanding of how leaders can adapt their styles to fit various
situations and the expectations of a statesmen.
Case Study: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
The state of Texas takes great pride in its comprehensive commitment to the health and
wellness of its communities by actively monitoring and regulating contamination prevention.
State officials rely heavily on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to
oversee and enforce policies and regulations effectively. “The Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality strives to protect our state's public health and natural resources consistent
with sustainable economic development. Our goal is clean air, clean water, and the safe
management of waste,” (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2025). Having the right
leaders is crucial for advocating on behalf of Texas citizens and collaborating with government
officials to enact effective policies. “During the regular legislative session in 2023, state
lawmakers considered 655 bills that had the potential to affect the programs and activities of the
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Of those, 138 bills were passed and became law,”
(Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2025). One significant piece of legislation that
was nominated by Senator Charles Schwertner, and passed, is the extension of the TCEQ Sunset
Bill 1397, which prolongs its mandate for an additional 12 years while also updating its
operational functions and processes. Specifically, the bill aims to enhance the penalties that the
state environmental agency can impose on industrial facilities that fail to comply with state
regulations, while also providing the public with additional time to offer feedback on industry
permits” (Martinez, 2023). Texas Senator Schwertner acknowledged that a decade had passed
since the last review of the TCEQ and emphasized the importance of including the public in
meetings, allowing them to express their concerns; his notion included the following:
SB 1397 and its companion bill,EHouse Bill 1505, by Rep.EKeith Bell,ER-Forney, include
a number of changes to how the TCEQ operates, such as requiring the agency to email
meeting notices to Texans who live near a facility when it’s applying for a permit
renewal, as well as posting meetings on its website — in addition to the required public
posting in local newspapers or other publications. (Martinez, 2023).
His actions exemplify transformative and servant leadership by pinpointing legislative gaps and
empowering the public to voice their concerns. His thorough research and analysis of TCEQ
processes were vital in driving changes related to transactional leadership by holding
accountability for violators and enhancing public involvement. These collective efforts
exemplify a strong commitment to public trust and highlight his capacity to make impactful
executive decisions for the benefit of the state of Texas and its citizens. His benevolence honors
God’s will to take care of the environment just as Numbers 35:33 proclaims, “Do not pollute the
land where you are. Bloodshed pollutes the land,Eand atonement cannot be made for the land on
which blood has been shed, except by the blood of the one who shed it,” (Bible gateway, 2025).
Conclusion
State and local leaders carry the crucial responsibility of protecting the community
through effective policy development, astute resource management, and the implementation of
enhanced safety measures. Selecting the right officials to advocate for the community is vital for
boosting public service motivation and ensuring a responsive approach to institutions and
organizations (Caillier, 2011, p. 113). As statesmen, these leaders are held to high standards
within the government and are expected to demonstrate exemplary conduct in state agencies. In
this context, Texas officials have secured their positions by utilizing transformative,
transactional, and servant leadership styles to effectively address the regulatory gaps within the
TCEQ. Their ongoing efforts will play a crucial role in shaping the state's priorities and
addressing any outstanding challenges.
References
Bible Gateway. (2025). Numbers 35:33: New international version. Retrieved by
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers%2035&version=NIV
Caillier, J. G. (2011). I Want to Quit: A Closer Look at Factors That Contribute to the Turnover
Intentions of State Government Employees. State & Local Government Review, 43(2),
110–122. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41303182
Cherry, K. C. (2022). How a transactional leadership style works. Retrieved by
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-transactional-
leadership-2795317#:~:text=Transactional%20leadership%20is%20a%20leadership,supe
rvision%2C%20performance%2C%20and%20outcomes.
Liu, X., Wang, Y., Wasti, S., Lee, T., Li, W., Zhou, S., Flynn, J., Sheesley, R. J., Usenko, S., &
Liu, F. (2024). Impacts of anthropogenic emissions and meteorology on spring ozone
differences in San Antonio, Texas between 2017 and 2021. The Science of the Total
Environment., 914, 169693–169693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169693
Martinez, A. (2023). Texas senate seeks increased penalties on polluters as it renews state’s
environmental agency. The Tribune Review. Retrieved by
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/04/17/texas-senate-bill-commission-environmental-
quality-sunset-review/
Partnership for public service. (2025). Public service leadership model: The standard for
effective federal leadership. Retrieved by https://ourpublicservice.org/public-service-
leadership-institute/public-service-leadership-model/
Rueters. (2021). Fact check: Test a man’s chacter quote misattributed to Abraham Lincoln.
Retrieved by https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/test-a-mans-character-quote-
misattributed-to-abraham-lincoln-idUSL1N2PA1V7/
Van Horn, C.E. (2005). The State of the States. SAGE Publications, Inc. (US).
https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9781483371122
Van Wart, M. (2003). Public-Sector Leadership Theory: An Assessment.EPublic Administration
Review,E63(2), 214–228.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/977592
Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). Transformational Leadership in the Public Sector: Does
Structure Matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 20(1), 75–89.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/20627893
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
