1 / 8100%
lOMoARcPSD|21126671
Quiz 2 - Quiz 2
Philosophy and Contemporary Ideas (Liberty
University)
lOMoARcPSD|21126671
●
Question
1
If you have enough evidence you can be logically certain of a
conclusion arrived at inductively.
Selected Tr
Answer: ue
●
Question 2
0 out of 3
points
0 out of 3
points
An inference drawn from statistical reasoning is deductive.
Selected Tr
Answer: ue
●
Question 3
0 out of 3 points
Identify this kind of argument: If naturalism is true, then all things are
determined and there is no free will. If there is no free will then morality
makes no sense.
Therefore, if naturalism is true then morality makes no sense.
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
4
disjunctiv
e
syllogism
3 out of 3
points
Invalid deductive arguments are the same as inductive arguments.
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
5
Fa
l
se
0 out of 3
points
In a deductive syllogism, if the premises are true and the conclusion is
true, then the argument is valid.
Selected Tr
Answer: ue
●
Question 6
0 out of 3 points
An analogy is an inductive argument.
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
7
Fa
l
se
3 out of 3
points
lOMoARcPSD|21126671
●
Question
1
“Begging the question” is a fallacy of presumption.
Selected Tr
Answer: ue
lOMoARcPSD|21126671
●
Question
8
3 out of 3
points
Identify the fallacy: Senator Newkirk’s arguments to increase federal
spending for the military should be rejected. He is only arguing because
he has several military bases in his state and is beginning his re-election
campaign.
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
9
ad
homine
m
3 out of 3
points
Slippery slope and straw man are really doing the same thing, just in a
different order.
Selecte
d
Answer
:
Fa
l
se
●
Question
10
0 out of 3
points
This fallacy argues erroneously from the whole to each of the parts:
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
11
Composi
ti
on
3 out of 3
points
The red herring fallacy:
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
12
changes
the subject
3 out of 3
points
This fallacy occurs when an argument is distorted to an extreme
and becomes a false imitation of the original argument:
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
13
stra
w
man
3 out of 3
points
In deductive reasoning, the argument is either valid or invalid.
lOMoARcPSD|21126671
Selected Tr
Answer: ue
●
Question
14
0 out of 3
points
Identify the following type of syllogism: “All philosophers are good looking
individuals. All good looking individuals are intelligent. Therefore all
philosophers
lOMoARcPSD|21126671
are intelligent.
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
15
disjunct
i
ve
3 out of 3
points
According to the reading, even God cannot create a contradiction.
Selected Tr
Answer: ue
●
Question
16
0 out of 3
points
No inductive argument can arrive at a logically certain conclusion, i.e. in which the
conclusion is necessarily true.
Selecte
d
Answer
:
Fa
l
se
●
Question
17
3 out of 3
points
Propositions are evaluated according to their
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
18
truth
valu
e
3 out of 3
points
If an argument is sound, it means
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
19
it is
vali
d
3 out of 3
points
Occam’s razor says:
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
20
the simplest explanation is
usually the best
0 out of 3
points
A positive/negative approach is the weakest approach to take in
lOMoARcPSD|21126671
presenting an argument.
Selected Tr
Answer: ue
●
Question 21
In the best explanation approach,
illumination
3 out of 3
points
lOMoARcPSD|21126671
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
22
provides information on
related areas
3 out of 3
points
Explanatory Scope refers to:
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
23
the quantity
of facts
3 out of 3
points
Ad Hoc refers to:
Selecte
d
Answer
:
●
Question
24
an explanation that is created for the
situation at hand
3 out of 3
points
Knowing the main point of the argument will help me find the conclusion.
Selected Tr
Answer: ue
●
Question
25
3 out of 3
points
The Latin phrase that means ‘it does not follow’ is:
Selected
Answer:
Respons
e
Feedbac
k:
Non
Sequitur
[None
Given]
Students also viewed