IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1
Informatics Plan Implementation
Monica D. Sleboda
School of Nursing, Liberty University
Author Note
Monica D. Sleboda
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Monica D. Sleboda
Email: mdsleboda@liberty.edu
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2
Informatics Plan Implementation
Electronic Health Record (EHR) implementation can be a huge hurdle if not performed
correctly. An organization can face many obstacles and challenges if a clear roadmap is not
designed prior to implementation. That is why it is very important to have a clear plan that
includes the right team in place to make go-live smooth, a proper budget to support
implementation, and a program that is user friendly for even non-tech savvy individuals. Once an
organization decides on the type of EHR program they want to install, whether purchased,
leased, or built in-house, they will need to devise an implementation plan. This paper will look at
such a plan using the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN), important health IT
policies needed, any ethical issues that should be considered, and the potential benefits of
implementation.
Quality and Safety Education for Nurses
The quality and safety education for nurses (QSEN) is a program that helps to guide
nurses in the “what” and “how” they deliver nursing care as well as helps nurses understand the
difference between the “what is” and “what should be” (Flavin, 2018). There are six main QSEN
competencies: quality improvement (QI), safety, teamwork and collaboration, patient-centered
care, evidence-based practice (EBP), and informatics. All six of these competencies need to be
considered when implementing a new EHR system.
Quality Improvement
The basis of any EHR implementation project should be the quality improvement of care
provided by an institution. EHR systems should be able to monitor data in relation to care
outcomes as well as meet reporting requirements as defined by the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS). Some reporting guidelines required by CMS include central line
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3
associated blood stream infections (CLABSI), catheter associated urinary tract infections
(CAUTI), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), clostridium difficile infections
(CDI), surgical site infections (SSI), and vaccination records such as influenza and COVID
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2020).
Safety
A proper EHR system should reduce the risk of harm to patients with the use of
computerized provider order entry (CPOE). Requiring physicians to enter their own orders will
reduce errors by ensuring that the physicians orders are standardized, legible, and complete;
improve efficiency by allowing physicians to enter orders for lab, x-ray, and pharmacies which
will result in faster response times by these entities; and improve reimbursements (HealthIT,
2018). CPOE is a core meaningful use objective in both stage 1 and stage 2: stage 1 requires
CPOE for medication orders and stage 2 requires CPOE for medication, laboratory, and
radiology orders (HealthIT, 2018).
Clinical decision support systems (CDS) are another advantage to EHR implementation
in providing safe care for patients. Wiegel et al., (2020), insists that the use of CDS will improve
patient safety and workflow as well as increase efficiency and advance standardization of clinical
processes. The purpose of CDS is to “analyze data within EHRs and to provide prompts and
reminders to assist health-care providers in implementing evidence-based clinical guidelines at
the point of care” (CDC, 2020, para. 1). When applied properly, this can assist physicians in the
proper ordering of tests for any given problem. Many hospitals have implemented CDS when
ordering lab tests for CAUTI’s and CDI screening. When a physician enters an order for the lab
test, the physician must answer a series of qualifying questions to determine if the patient meets
the standards for testing. If the patient does not meet the standards, then the test will be rejected.
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 4
Teamwork and Collaboration
The EHR system should be able to function effectively between interprofessional teams,
such as nursing, laboratory, radiology, and physicians. With effective implementation of the EHR
system, orders should flow seamlessly through the different professions within the hospital
setting which will ultimately improve the coordination of care. Bosch and Mansell (2015), write
that “improved health care collaboration has been cited as a key strategy for health care reform”
(p. 176).
Another aspect of teamwork and collaboration is during the rollout of an EHR system. By
having had different professionals involved in the planning stage, including nurses, physicians,
laboratory and pharmacy specialist, and business office employees, will allow for an easier
transition to a new EHR system. Proper leadership and support prior to and during the rollout
process can help facilitate buy-in from all other team members. Providing leadership will also
ensure that implementation teams function in a cohesive manner and provide the proper support
to clinical staff (Nelson & Staggers, 2018).
Patient-Centered Care
Patient-centered care should be at the forefront of any EHR rollout. When transitioning to
a new system it is imperative that patient care continue uninterrupted. Therefore, many facilities
will do a phased rollout, which means that certain features will open in a stepwise approach or
certain sectors of the hospital, such as emergency room (ER), new patients, operating room, etc.,
will go-live first. A phased rollout, also known as an incremental approach, has been proven to
improve physician and staff satisfaction while also allowing for the identification and correction
of any system glitches or gaps (Aguirre et al., 2019). Once these glitches and gaps in care have
been corrected the rollout will continue slowly to other units. There are many advantages and
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 5
disadvantages to the incremental rollout, as well as the immediate rollout, that facilities need to
consider. Advantages to an incremental rollout include reduced productivity loss, easier
correction of noted issues, and allows for staff to gradually learn and master the system (Aguirre
et al., 2019). Disadvantages include the requirement of strictly following a workplan to keep
implementation phases on track, close attention to hybrid processes, and awareness of the
different functions that are being launched at any given time (Aguirre et al., 2019).
Evidence-Based Practice
EHR systems can support EBP in several ways, including identifying patients who are at
risk for falls, CAUTIs, CLABSIs, and SSIs. The basis of EBP is to implement a decision, plan,
or agreement into effect (McNett et al., 2021). When a new patient is admitted to a unit within
the hospital, the system should be able to flag whether they are at risk for any of the above listed
issues. If a patient is on any of the fall causing medications the system should automatically flag
the nurse and physician of this as well as trigger a care plan item and teaching opportunity for the
patient. Another goal for EHR implementation is to allow for “information technologies to
translate scientific evidence-based care into interface representations that make the practical
implications of this evidence for clinical decisions salient to or more accessible for practitioners”
(Flach et al., 2018, p. 30). The ultimate goal of any EHR system is to support evidence-based
clinical practice and research.
Informatics
EHR systems should be able to communicate with other interfaces and technology,
reduce errors, and support decision making among staff. The Public Health Informatics Institute
(2020) insists that in order to be informatics-savvy, a facility must have an overall vision and
strategy got how they use their information and information technology, a skilled workforce, and
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 6
a well-designed and effectively used EHR system. With the proper use of the EHR system, a
facility will be able to use the information garnered to improve public health practices and health
outcomes.
It is also the responsibility of the informatics teams, along with other facility
professionals, to ensure a smooth rollout of the new EHR system. Using guiding principles will
assist in this process, as well as anchor the planning. Guiding principles will assist in the
development of an installation roadmap that will meet the needs of the facility, develop effective
governance and accountability, and improve the efficiency of workflow (PHII, 2019). The rollout
roadmap will assist informatics specialists in conducting system testing which will identify
problem areas and bottlenecks, identify key information and documents that need to be in the
system, and develop a plan to for entering information into the system as the need arises. An
EHR Implementation checklist would be a valuable tool to have in place prior to go-live.
Health IT Policies
When implementing a new EHR system it is important to understand the rules and
regulations which drive the use as written by the government and other entities. Patient privacy is
of utmost importance when considering the use of any EHR system. Therefore, it is important for
strict IT policies to be put in place that will protect the unintended release of protected health
information. The IT department must establish rules within the system that determine which staff
can access certain information. For example, if a high-profile patient is admitted to the hospital,
there needs to be regulations and policies written to protect that individual from others accessing
their health information who have no business accessing said information. Some systems require
the use of 2-person authentication for access to verify the need is there. Many systems will also
allow for reports to be run to identify individuals who have accessed medical records to
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 7
determine if the individual had the right to do so. The Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) outlines how patient information may be used and shared.
Other important policies that should be considered is the prohibited use of an
organizations electronic resources for personal use, private business use, or commercial
activities. Policy should also be written to prevent the use of unauthorized electronic resources
that could disrupt operations or compromise security as well as use of data capturing electronics
such as universal serial buses (USB). Security should be at the forefront of any EHR
development and implementation in order to protect patient privacy and work controls.
Ethical Considerations
Just like security, ethical issues need to be considered when developing and
implementing an EHR system. One such ethical consideration is the use of collected health
information for research purposes. When gathering patient data for research from any EHR
system it is important to ensure proper removal of any protected health information and
personally identifiable information. With the implementation of electronic medical records, this
has allowed for beneficial studies to be performed with the use of large, complex data sets from
multiple entities (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2015). In order to protect
individuals from identification in a research study, it is important for proper deidentification to
be performed. There are two methods in which organizations may deidentify personal data in
accordance with the HIPAA Privacy rule: expert determination and safe harbor. The U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) define expert determination as a process in
which health information that does not identify an individual is removed to the point where a
covered entity, the expert, is not able to identify the individual involved. The second method,
safe harbor, requires the removal of 18 types of identifiers including name, geographic
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8
information, telephone numbers, device identifiers, email addresses, medical record numbers,
insurance plan information, etc. The safe harbor method is the strongest method as it is virtually
impossible to reidentify an individual through reverse identification. So, it is important for any
EHR system to be able to follow the rules of deidentification to protect patient information.
Potential Benefits
There are many benefits to converting to an EHR system, including faster access to
patient medical information, more coordinated, efficient care, better safeguards in medication
prescribing, improved efficiency and reduced costs through reduced test duplication and
improved response times. With the use of EHRs physicians and medical professionals can
improve patient and provider interaction which will assist patients in being more proactive in
their own care. By implementing services such as mobile health, wearable technologies, and
telehealth systems within the EHR, information can be shared even faster.
Another benefit of implementing an EHR is meeting meaningful use guidelines
implemented by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). The term
“meaningful use” came into play when the Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health (HITECH) act was signed into law. The purpose behind this act was to ensure
that healthcare providers integrated EHRs into their practice in a meaningful way and by doing
so the providers were reimbursed with an incentive program for care provided to their patients
(Nelson & Staggers, 2018). HealthIT.gov (2013) reports that for eligible providers and hospitals
to demonstrate meaningful use they must be able to demonstrate electronic data capture and
sharing, advanced clinical processes, and improved outcomes.
Conclusion
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9
Electronic Health Record implementation can be a long and tedious project for any
facility to undertake. Whether changing systems or implementing a new system, it is important to
have a good plan in place. When starting to build a plan it would be beneficial to start by using
the QSEN program. With the six guidelines laid out in this program, it will make implementation
much smoother by giving direction on important issues to consider such as quality improvement,
safety, teamwork and collaboration, patient-centered care, evidence-based practice, and
informatics. The goal of any EHR should be quality of care improvements as demonstrated
through meeting meaningful use guidelines. Prevention of hospital acquired conditions such as
CLABSIs, CAUTIs, and SSIs should be able to be facilitated with the implementation of an EHR
system. EHR systems bring with them numerous safety features that focus on patient-centered
care. Once implemented they can also assist in research while protecting patient privacy. There
are numerous ethical issues that need to be considered though before using EHR information in
research. Patient health information protection is most important when using data collected from
an EHR for research. There are laws in place, such as HIPAA, that dictate how and when patient
data may be used. Therefore, it is important to understand and follows these regulations to
protect the organization from lawsuits. Finally, it is of utmost importance to have strong security
policies in place to prevent unintended downtime from malicious malware that has been
introduced to the system by unknowing employees who are accessing unapproved websites.
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 10
References
Aguirre, R. R., Suarez, O., Fuentes, M., & Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. A. (2019). Electronic health
record implementation: A review of resources and tools. Cureus, 11(9), 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5649
Bosch, B., & Mansell, H. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in health care: Lessons to be
learned from competitive sports. Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue Des Pharmaciens
Du Canada, 148(4), 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1715163515588106
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2020, June 25). Implementing clinical
decision support systems. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
https://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/pubs/guides/best-practices/clinical-decision-support.htm.
CDC. (2020, February 24). CMS - ACH Requirements. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/cms/ach.html.
Flach, J. M., Schanely, P., Kuenneke, L., Chidoro, B., Mubaslat, J., & Howard, B. (2018).
Electronic health records and evidence-based practice: Solving the little-data problem.
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health
Care, 7(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857918071002
Flavin, B. (2018, April 24). What are QSEN competencies and why are they important for
nurses? Rasmussen University. https://www.rasmussen.edu/degrees/nursing/blog/what-are-
qsen-competencies/.
HealthIT. (2018, March 21). What is computerized provider order entry? HealthIT.gov.
https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-computerized-provider-order-entry.
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 11
McNett, M., Tucker, S., & Melnyk, B. M. (2021). Evidence‐based practice requires evidence‐
based implementation. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(2), 74–75.
https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12494
Nelson, R., & Staggers, N. (2018). In Health informatics: an interprofessional approach (2nd
ed., pp. 499–515). book, Elsevier.
Public Health Informatics Institute (PHII). (2019, February 26). Developing a strategic
informatics roadmap. PHII. https://phii.org/resources/view/9614/developing-strategic-
informatics-roadmap.
PHII. (2020). Informatics-savvy health department toolkit: Introduction. PHII.
https://phii.org/informatics-savvy-toolkit-homepage/informatics-savvy-toolkit-
homepage/informatics-savvy-toolkit.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2015, November 6). Methods for De-
identification of PHI. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-
professionals/privacy/special-topics/de-identification/index.html#rationale.
Wiegel, V., King, A., Mozaffar, H., Cresswell, K., Williams, R., & Sheik, A. (2019). A systematic
analysis of the optimization of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision
support systems: A qualitative study in English hospitals. Health Informatics Journal,
26(2), 1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219868650