International Relation Theories 1
Essay: International Relations Theories
Name: Farhat Mir
Liberty University
INTL 500
Professor: David Holt
Date: 28th October, 2025
International Relation Theories 2
Abstract
Theory is a tool and a framework for the policy makers which shapes who they see the
importance of different events without a one on one basis communication between the theory
and the policy. Different policy makers have different mind sets and they interpret the events
based on their priorities and situations hence they can make the opposite decision. In this essay
I will discuss three different theories: realism, liberalism and conservatism of International
relations and factors behind these theories. There is a very strong and impactful relation
between international relations theories and policy making. I will also discuss the theories on
international relations and the
influence of these theories on policymakers.
International Relation Theories 3
What is the relationship of theory to actual policy?
In international relations theories are not the guidelines but serve as an analytical method
which makes the relationship between the international relations theories and the policy
making very complex. Policy makers' interpretation of the theories liberalism, realism and
conservatism is different which leads to the different outcome for the same event. Theories like
liberalism, activism and constructivism provide a framework to understand the state’s behavior
but do not provide a holistic solution for policy making. Policy makers can look at the events
through the lenses of these theories to determine and interpret the policy. After policy makers
observe the events and the international politics based on their belief and objectives they want
to obtain they create a policy. Realism is the theory where international relations are viewed as
competitive, conflict driven, power and survival. “In the discipline of international relations
there are contending general theories or theoretical perspectives. Realism, also known as
political realism, is a view of international politics that stresses its competitive and conflictual
side. It is usually contrasted with idealism or liberalism, which tends to emphasize cooperation.
Realists consider the principal actors in the international arena to be states, which are
concerned with their own security, act in pursuit of their own national interests, and struggle for
power. The negative side of the realists’ emphasis on power and self-interest is often their
skepticism regarding the relevance of ethical norms to relations among states. National politics
is the realm of authority and law, whereas international politics, they sometimes claim, is a
sphere without justice, characterized by active or potential conflict among states, where ethical
standards do not apply” (Korab-Karpowicz, 2023).
International Relation Theories 4
Constructivist theory is a framework towards how human institutions shape the state actions.
According to constructivist theory, individuals build their own knowledge through their own life
experiences and the interaction with people rather than just receiving the information and
processing it through policymaking. Constructive theory focuses on building relationships,
sharing ideas and identities. The reality of international relations is not objective; it is
constructed on a social basis on interactions, sharing and understanding. “The term
Constructivism was adopted by
Nicholas Onuf in 1989 and introduced as "people and societies construct or constitute each
other". The main assumption of constructivists is that the fundamental structures of
international politics are social and these structures shape actors' identities and interests.
Therefore, the world is structured by both knowledge and material factors, according to
constructivists the main important relation is between agents and structures. Moreover,
constructivists adopt a common concern when understanding and explaining how international
structures are defined by ideas and how identities and interests of the states and non-state
players are influenced by the structures” (Ouchenane, 2017).
Liberalism theory focuses on the relationship among the states through international
institutions, economic independence and democratic governance as path to peace and mutual
benefits. “. The US is a liberal democratic state—with a society that celebrates liberal ideals and
aspirations—and this has also helped shape the theories and debates that form the core of the
field of IR. The US has given special voice to liberal theories of IR. Theories of IR can never stray
very far from issues about power—what it is and how it is exercised. But in the American
context, theory also cannot stray too far from liberal issues about democracy, markets and
international institutions” (Ikenberry, 2009). According to liberalism theory strong economic
International Relation Theories 5
ties between the states create mutual understanding and benefits which helps to resolve the
problems between the states to support the benefits through these ties. International
organizations like the United Nations and the world trade organizations are the creation of
liberalism theory which provide a mutual framework for cooperation and help in resolving the
issues peacefully.
Are theories Pre-Packed conceptual tools policy makers apply to the interpretation of the
actual event?
Theories help policy makers to interpret the event not a one to one correspondence to the
event by itself. Different people can have different beliefs and understanding and they can have
different policies on the same event. Theories are not a prepackaged tool, it's a framework
which is used by the state’s policy makers to develop their own policies based on their
preferences, understanding and priorities. The relationship between a theory and a policy is a
two way road and there are at the same time multiple theories which can be used to create a
policy for the same event. Policy makers take an event and based on the theory framework they
create their one policy which helps them based on the time and the manner. “Theories are
general statements that describe and explain the causes or effects of classes of phenomena.
They are composed of causal laws or hypotheses, explanations, and antecedent conditions.
Explanations are also composed of causal laws or hypotheses, which are in turn composed of
dependent and independent variables”(Wihbey et al., 2015).
Expressed differently, is there a 1/1 correspondence between a particular event and the
theory that explains it?
International Relation Theories 6
Normally there is no one on one correspondence between a particular event since theories
constantly evolve and sometimes a new theory will replace an old theory. Theory is not a fact,
it's a framework and events are seen through the lens of this framework and based on the
interpretation the policies are created. Even the policymakers within the same theory will have
differences of opinion and preferences. Two realists might come to two opposite conclusions
based on how they see and interpret an event. Theory is a tool and policymakers have their own
experiences, preferences and understandings about the event and they can have their own
policies. Different policy makers take things differently. One realist might take a military solution
capable of maintaining power, stability and future aggression, whereas at the same time the
other realist might think it's risky and can cause financial and social problems which can
destabilize the region. Theory is a guideline, it does not dictate a policy. Theory is subjective and
it depends on the policy maker's belief, analysis and interpretation of an event. The relationship
between the theory and the policy is not simple, policy is created by the guidelines and the
framework provided by the theory and it depends on the complexity of the situation.
Can you identify a particular IR theory that appeals to you as the better explanation of human
behavior than others? Or would you say that the existence of multiple theories is an
indication that perhaps all of them are plausible as possible interpretations of the same or
different human events? Be clear and use examples to make your case.
Each theory is a valuable tool and a framework for the policymakers and the importance of the
use of that theory depends on the interpretation. The most important thing is to determine the
strength of the theory which policymakers use to create a policy. Both constructivism and
liberalism are based on the same principles which are mutual understanding, cooperation and
social interactions. These theories are beyond self-interest and tunnel vision; it opens up world
International Relation Theories 7
cooperation and mutual benefits. International relation theories are very complex since these
theories pave the ways for international peace and cooperation. This theory explains
phenomena such as war, peace, cooperation, oppression, economic development and creation
of international law. “Realism is a straightforward approach to international relations, stating
that all nations are working to increase their own power, and those countries that manage to
hoard power most efficiently will thrive, as they can easily eclipse the achievements of less
powerful nations. The theory further states that a nation’s foremost interest should be self-
preservation and that continually gaining power should always be a social, economic, and
political imperative” (Norwich University, n.d.).
Every theory has its different perspectives and it all depends on the world order. Which theory
can make a difference in international relations between the states and can bring peace and
prosperity in the region. Not every problem can be solved with peace so as not every economic
cooperation can be achieved by the war, it all depends how policy makers interpret the event
and which policy they implement to create the policies which best suit their nation's best
interest.
Consider the structure of the US government as reflected in the Constitution (i.e.,
institutional checks and balances, power-sharing among federal and state authority, etc.)
Does this structure reflect a realist, liberal, or some other theory of human behavior? In
effect, is the ‘more perfect union’ of 1787 infused with a more realist or more liberal spirit,
or maybe a bit of both? Explain the possibilities concisely yet clearly with Examples.
International Relation Theories 8
The US constitution believes that people are capable of self-governance but at the same time
checks against corruption are important. Systems are always composed of checks and balances
that keep the operations effective. The US constitution is a blend of liberal and realist theories
of human behavior. Accountability is the check on power and it keeps the balance between
power and integrity. Liberal element in the US constitution emphasizes self-governance and
believes people are rational and believes in self-governance. It believes in liberalism by having
the elected representative in congress to represent the voice of people and the bill of rights
incorporates the liberal idea of giving people protection for their rights and freedom.
Realist elements in the constitution represent the separation of power and checks and balances
system. The Constitution has federalism which separates the power between the state and the
federal level which creates multiple approaches to power instead of giving all the power to the
center. The states can check the federal level powers and the federal level power is superior but
not all powerful center authority. “In this Federalist Paper, James Madison explains and defends
the checks and balances system in the Constitution. Each branch of government is framed so
that its power checks the power of the other two branches; additionally, each branch of
government is dependent on the people, who are the source of legitimate authority” (Madison,
1788).
The constitution of the US was signed in 1787 which created a stronger federal government and
the purpose of creating a more perfect union was to create a more stable government which
can assure equality, tranquility and justice to the nation. The more perfect Union of 1787
represented a blend of realist and liberalist spirits with practical compromises and ideological
separations. “On September 17, 1787, after several days of further revision, the Constitutional
Convention voted in favor of the Constitution. The states were left to accept or reject this new
International Relation Theories 9
plan of government. Delegate James Madison, one of the Constitution's most fervent advocates,
felt that the success or failure of the American Constitution "would forever decide the fate of
republican government."(Library of Congress, 2015).
The realist spirit of the more perfect union of 1787 represented a stronger federal government
to ensure enforcement of the laws, tax and regulate commerce. Since the farmer realized the
article of confederation is weak to function and protect their rights. The constitution was
created after a long list of negotiations and compromises to balance the interest of small and
large States. An example of realist theory in the constitution is the separation of government
power into legislative, executive and judicial branches to have accountability and not having one
branch holding the ultimate power.
Aspiration and progress represent the liberalism theory in the constitution. A more perfect
union suggests constant improvement and changes to gain the goal. The founders of the
constitutions saw it as a foundation which could be amended depending on the future needs
and progress. Bill of rights is a prime example of liberalism theory with the idea of protecting
individual civil rights and civil liberties. Another example of liberalism in the constitution is the
thirteenth amendment in the constitution which abolished slavery and moved the nation
towards a “more perfect union”.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the
pursuit of Happiness—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish
International Relation Theories 10
it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its
powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and
Happiness”(Beeman, 2024).
References:
Korab-Karpowicz, J. (2023, October 9). Political Realism in International Relations. Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Stanford. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-intl-relations/
Ouchenane, A. (2017). Constructivism in International Relations - International Affairs Forum.
International Affairs Forum. https://www.ia-forum.org/Content/ViewInternal_Document.cfm?
contenttype_id=5&ContentID=8773
Ikenberry, G. J. (2009). Liberalism in a Realist World. International Studies, 46(1-2), 203–219.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600213
Wihbey, J., March 6, T. J. R., & 2015. (2015, March 6). Guide to critical thinking, research, data
and theory: Overview for journalists. The Journalist’s Resource.
https://journalistsresource.org/home/guide-academic-methods-critical-thinking-theory-
overview journalists/
Norwich University. (n.d.). Key Theories of International Relations | Norwich University - Online.
Online.norwich.edu. https://online.norwich.edu/online/about/resource-library/key-
theories international-relations
International Relation Theories 11
Madison, J. (1788). Federalist Papers No. 51. Bill of Rights Institute.
https://billofrightsinstitute.org/primary-sources/federalist-no-51
Beeman, R. (2024). The Constitutional Convention of 1787: A Revolution in Government | The
National Constitution Center. National Constitution Center – Constitutioncenter.org.
https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/white-papers/the-constitutional-convention of-
1787-a-revolution-in-government
Library of Congress. (2015). Creating a Constitution | To Form a More Perfect Union | Articles
and Essays | Documents from the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention,
17741789 | Digital Collections | Library of Congress. The Library of Congress.
https://www.loc.gov/collections/continental-congress-and-constitutional-convention-from-
1774to-1789/articles-and-essays/to-form-a-more-perfect-union/creating-a-constitution/
International Relation Theories 12