Olyen Scott
Liberty University
Homeland Security Organization and Administration
All Hazards vs. Terrorism
Professor Richards
April 8, 2019
After having read the text and any additional research you choose, explain what all hazards
means.
All hazards is determined as a natural, high-tech, or human caused catastrophe that
places in jeopardy the civil liberties, protection of life, assets, and situation of human life and
organizations . This observation helps to determine ways to mitigate losses,
casualties, and infrastructure damages.
Assess how all hazards and terrorism relate or do not relate when viewed from an overall
homeland security/emergency management perspective.
The war on terrorism and all hazards approach is a longevity one that will continue to be
fought strategically, efficiently, and effectively by all organizations. The United States cannot
afford to place the civil liberties and well-being of their population at risk for national security.
In contrast, the policies have some errors in judgment when it comes to cyber sabotage,
transcontinental terrorism and criminal network instability, and even the lack of preparation
towards the effects of climate and global change epidemics.
Their policies and procedures are similar because they demonstrate evolvement into the
future to combating terrorism, WMD, cyber-crimes, natural disasters, and border patrols. For
example, “Both view bio preparedness as a priority, and an “all-hazards” approach is favored,
taking into account the full spectrum of biological risks, from natural outbreaks to accidental
contaminations and release and misuse. Nevertheless, the United States and the EU should seek
to adopt common definitions and terms of reference in order to improve communication and
avoid misunderstanding carry out oversight of all CBRN outreach, cooperative initiatives, and
activities in order to improve coordination and enhance transatlantic dialogue; recognize the
importance of engaging industrial and scientific communities in transatlantic initiatives and
dialogues” (Conley, 2011).
Hurricanes and other natural disasters such as Hurricane Irma, Harvey and Katrina have
proved the fragile vulnerabilities within our country’s preparedness capabilities for such
downfalls. As the twenty-first century approaches more climate changes, global warming, in
earthquakes are looking to add to these problems. Additionally, 9/11, Oklahoma City Bombing,
and various other acts of terrorism on the home front have proven the need for strict training
programs and information sharing between all entities of the local, state, private, and tribal
sectors. Such controversy has led to researchers reviewing the strict separations on both sides in
critical infrastructures, policies, and guidance, best and failed practices by the EU and DHS.
Each must continue to raise internal awareness on cross border threats in order to identify the
gaps between the organizations to secure a successful engagement in joint exercises to enhance
the relationships and engagements between EU, US, DHS, FEMA, and NATO.
Should 1 take precedence over the other when it comes to disaster management? Why or
why not?
On the other hand, I do believe that disaster management should take precedence over
terrorism. Although both inflict a huge impact on the civil liberties, civil rights, and safety
concerns of the American people, however, first responders, government officials, and the
community staff can better prepare for a natural disaster than an act of terrorism. A disaster you
can predict from meteorologist and researchers, a terrorist act you will not know it is happening
until it actually happens, similar to 9/11. Then everyone would be caught off guard as usual.
Officials can better mitigate, prepare, respond, and execute recovery actions for natural disasters
more effectively as displayed during Hurricane Harvey. Hebrews 4:16 states, “for we do not
have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who in
every respect has been tested as we are, yet without sin. Let us therefore approach the throne of
grace with boldness, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.” Such
actions should be implemented in emergency management to change the narrative and broaden
the perspective. According to Joshua 1:9, “be strong and courageous; do not be frightened or
dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.” Even in times of struggle and
defeat our first responders and victims are not alone and covered by our Savior Jesus Christ.
Reference:
Conley, H. (2011). EU-U.S. Security Strategies: Comparative Scenarios and Recommendations. Retrieved
from https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/legacy_files/files/publication/110614_Conley_EUUSSecurity_WEB.pdf
Sylves, R. (2015). Disaster Policy and Politics: Emergency Management and Homeland Security. [MBS
Direct]. Retrieved from https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781483324135/
