Josephine Buadu
Research Paper
ENGL 216
0406/2012
Title: A Case for the Holistic Enrichment and Empowerment of Women’s Lives through
Comprehensive Education
Introduction:
The preamble of the United States Declaration of Independence states that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by the Creator with certain unalienable rights that among
these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. However, as history has shown, though we
may profess this ideal notion of the immeasurable intrinsic worth of humans, females have over
the centuries been perceived and treated as secondary men inferior to their male counterparts.
Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women seeks to draw attention to the
maligned role of women in the 18th century. She advocates on the need to safeguard the rights of
women through their empowerment with the timeless tool of education so as to ensure they do
not regress socially and rather become valuable contributors to modern society. Though the
setting of this literary piece is over two centuries removed from today, it speaks to the general
state of the stagnation of women’s rights and their inability to secure more meaningful roles in
society.
The role and the contribution of women in society continue to evolve as centuries have
gone by. Throughout the years, the rights of women as preserved in societal values have dictated
the level of impact they can have within their marriages and communities they live. In her essay,
A Vindication of the Rights of Women, Mary Wollstonecraft highlights the need for the prevailing
society to provide access to higher education for all women to ensure that women continue to
become contributors to the advancement of the human race and not impediments. The purpose of
this paper is to educate readers about the pressing need to insist upon and promote women rights
by showcasing the slow progression of women’s rights through history, the limited means of
social advancement of women, the need for higher education for all women and the positive
impact this higher education will have on today’s society.
Slow Progression of Women’s Rights through History
It is common knowledge that women’s rights and privileges have lagged behind that of
men for unexplainable reasons. History is fraught with examples where the rights of women have
taken a backseat to the rights of men. A case in point of the lag in the rights of women is the
length of time it took for the global community to recognize that women needed to also have a
safeguarded right to vote. It was not until 1979 that the United Nations adopted the Convention
on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination (CEDAW) that women’s suffrage was
recognized globally as a right (United Nations). In the United States (US), a nation known for it’s
championing on democracy, it took almost one and a half centuries following the American
Revolution for activists of women’s right to win the battle for all US women to vote (Kay, 2034).
The disparities in female and male rights in society have been in existence prior to the
authorship of A Vindication of Women’s Rights and they persist to today despite the efforts of
many to ensure uniformity among the sexes. Even in today’s modern society, the most
prestigious golf society, the host of the Augusta golf tournament, refuses to publicly address its
resolve not to grant female membership in the club. The golf membership for women at a
prestigious club may be perceived as a frivolous example, but it speaks to a larger picture of how
there is still exclusion of privileges due to gender differences.
Universally, it is accepted that males are biologically constituted different from females.
In her musings, Wollstonecraft rightly points out that “in the government of the physical world it
is observable that the female in point of strength is, in general, inferior to the male” (Greenblatt,
1460) Although these biological differences exist, it does not mandate the lower sense of value
society has ascribed to females and their rights relative to that of their male counterparts
throughout history. The biological differences conferred unto women by nature as Wollstonecraft
states should not serve as a foundation for the human male to further debase the rights of the
female as has been observed throughout time.
Marriage as a Limited Means of Social Advancement for Women
In addition to the fact that the advancement of women’s rights in history has been slow,
the tools needed for women to rise in the “scale of animal being” have several limitations and
are not easily accessible to all women (Greenblatt, 1460 ). In the 18th century, one principal way
that author of the Vindication of Women Rights suggests that women could meaningfully advance
in society was only through marriage (Greenblatt, 1461)). The few women who gained suitable
life-long partners were then perceived to be destined for high mobility on the society ladder. This
transformation from spinster to a married woman did not grant access to the level of education
and legal rights that men experienced in the 18th century. The elevated married female relative to
the married male was resigned to childcare, childbirth, cooking, cleaning, dress, paint and
nicknaming God’s creatures (Wollstonecraft, Greenblatt, 1462).As historical records have shown
which also buttress Wollstonecraft assertions married women did not necessarily become these
lofty noble scholars and philosophers when they were married, they only had an increase in
domestic roles without much formal education.
Furthermore marriage as a perceived means of social mobility or refinement,
presupposes that any female who was not fortunate to be married in the course of her lifetime
would be left in an impoverished state of lower “ scale of animal being” until death. With the
present rate of divorces in the United States and the longer the current generation waits before
getting married, if marriage were still to be the only way females could rise above in society the
value of most women in the United States would be at a historical low even compared to that of
the Wollstonecraft’s era.
The Need for Higher Education for Women beyond that of the 18th Century and Current
Levels.
Wollstonecraft’s argument that the instruction women received in 18th century made them
weaker social beings resigned to being beautiful fixtures in society indicates that there were
deficiencies in education in that era. Although there had been some positive stride made in the
18th century relative to earlier ones and “the education of women has of late been more attended
to than formerly”; it was still very inadequate giving a false sense and “mistaken notion of
female excellence” (Greenblatt, 1461 ). The education that women received left them “still
reckoned a frivolous sex, and ridiculed or pitied by the (very) writers who endeavor by satire or
instruction to improve them” (Greenblatt, 1461).
The education of women based on the 18th century standard did not prepare women to be
the most ideal partners for their husbands or champions for the preservation of modern society
rather, according to Mary Wollstonecraft in very strong terms, it made them render them
“insignificant objects of desire -mere propagators of fools! … ridiculous and useless when the
short-lived bloom of beauty is over… rational men will excuse me for endeavoring to persuade
them to become more masculine and respectable” (Greenblatt, 1462).
In today’s modern society, women have access to higher education and teachings far
above what they were limited to in the 18th century. There are a lot more women attaining
Associate, Bachelor and Masters’ degrees in the field of science and arts at historical levels.
However, despite these laudable gains in access, women still lag behind their male counterparts
in the pursuit and the attainment of Doctorate degrees (Jacobs, 153-85).
Positive Impact Higher Education of Women has had and will have on Society.
The aforementioned lapse in education of women in the 18th century and throughout
history and in modern society clearly shows that the advancement of women’s rights with the
tool of education is not only justified, but also pressing. The comprehensive education of women
serves as catalysts for social change within any society. As Sharpless and Rury propounded in
their paper, the rise in the female labor force to adequately support the changing global economy
in the beginning of the twentieth century was in part a result of the higher quality of education
they were fortunate to receive (317-346). When women are given greater access to higher,
holistic, and comprehensive education the results that flow through society elevating the human
race to levels higher than before cannot be disputed (Jacobs, 153-85). In the United States, the
attainment of suffrage rights of women facilitated through educated female activists resulted in a
flood of legislation that increased public health spending and reducing childhood mortality
(Miller, 1287-1327).
Furthermore, the formal and informal education of Eleanor Roosevelt facilitated in
equipping her to be a proponent of noteworthy public policy causes resulting in the advancement
and protection of human rights (Johnson, 19). According a review of the impact of women’s
education of society by David S. Brown in the British Journal of Political Science, higher access
to education results in the generation of a force that drives economic growth (137).
In conclusion, women’s rights have a long way since the 18th century, yet there are lapses
that still need to be addressed. Women need access to all higher levels of education and all
barriers that prevented this should be removed to ensure the success of females. When women
are granted access to a complete education, they have the tendency to succeed, and when they
succeed, society also benefits as a whole. According to Mary Wollstonecraft, “let women be only
educated to inspire it, and let every charm be polished to intoxicate the senses; but, if they be
moral beings, let them have a chance to become intelligent; and let love to man be only a part of
that glowing flame of universal love, which, after encircling humanity, mounts in grateful
incence to God” (Greenblatt, 1462).
Bibliography:
1. Wollstonecraft, Mary, David Lorne Macdonald, and Kathleen Dorothy Scherf. A
Vindication Of The Rights Of Men, In A Letter To The Right Honourable Edmund Burke :
Occasioned By His Reflections On The Revolution In France ; And. Broadview Pr,
1997 :1456-1484.
2. United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women. Department of Economic and
Social Affairs. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against women. Retrieved 3/27/2012 from
<http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/reservations-country.htm> .
3. Brown, David S. “Democracy and Gender Inequality in Education: A Cross-National
Examination”. B. J. Pol S. 34 (2004):137-192
4. Jacobs, J.A. “Gender inequality and higher education”. Annu. Rev. Social 22
(1996):153-85.
5. Johnson, Glen, M. “The Contributions of Eleanor and Franklin Roosevelt to the
Development of International Rights”. Human Rights Quarterly 9.1 (1987):19-48.
.
6. Kay, Herma H. “From Second Sex to the Joint Venture: An Overview of Women’s
Rights and Family Law in the United States During the Twentieth Century”.
California Law Review, 88.6 (2000): 2017-2093.
7. Miller, Grant. “Women’s Suffrage, Political Responsiveness and Child Survival in
American History”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123.3 (2008) 1287-1327.
8. Sharpless J., & Rury, J. “The Political Economy of Women’s Work”. Social Science
History, 4.3(1980) 317-346.