CASE REVIEW 2
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 US 503 (1969)
What are the Facts of the Case?
In 1965, a group of students from Des Moines, Iowa, decided to wear black armbands to
school as a symbol of protest against the Vietnam War. However, upon learning of this plan, the
Des Moines Independent Community School District created a policy banning the wearing of
armbands, warning that any student who attempted to do so would be suspended. Despite the
warning, a group of students still wore the armbands to school and were indeed suspended. The
parents of the students then sued the school district, claiming that their First Amendment rights
had been violated.
What are the Major Issues of the Case?
The Tinker v. Des Moines case was a critical milestone in the history of student rights
and freedom of expression. One of the most significant issues at stake was the extent to which
the First Amendment applied to students while at school. The case also raised questions about
the right of students to express themselves through symbolic speech, such as wearing black
armbands. At the heart of this case was the need to balance individual rights with the interests of
the public, particularly in maintaining order and protecting the safety of students
What was the Rationale Given about the Case?
The Supreme Court stated that students do not lose their First Amendment rights when
they enter a public school. The Supreme Court based this decision on the notion that students
have an essential right to express themselves freely, as long as their actions do not significantly
disrupt the educational process. The court upheld that the wearing of an armband represented a
symbolic form of speech, and therefore was protected by the First Amendment. The court also
clarified that a school district's interest in preserving order does not outweigh a student's right to
CASE REVIEW 3
express themselves. For instance, it was found that no evidence had been presented that wearing
the armbands caused a disruption or interference with the educational process itself. Therefore,
the school district's policy was unconstitutional, as it was deemed too restrictive and a violation
of the students' First Amendment rights. The court emphasized that freedom of speech in schools
is particularly important given the unique educational mission of public schools, where students
need to be exposed to a wide range of ideas, viewpoints, and perspectives.
What were the Holdings from the Judges?
The Supreme Court held that it can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed
their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate (Fortas &
Supreme Court of The United States, 1968). The court also affirmed that freedom of speech is an
integral part of the education process, and that schools cannot prohibit or disrupt peaceful and
non-disruptive expression. In regard to this case, the court found that the students' right to free
speech outweighed the school district's interest in maintaining order and discipline.
Present Your Reaction to The Case?
: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District is an essential case in US
First Amendment law, especially for its legacy in the education system. Tinker v. Des Moines
provided a landmark ruling on free expression's school context and solidified longstanding First
Amendment precedent. It is a significant victory for students' freedom of speech, as it established
that protection extends to the ability to express oneself symbolically. The ruling clarifies that
student rights don't end at the school gates and that free speech is critical in education's
development; however, some still question how much student speech schools may restrict today.
Nonetheless, the Tinker decision outlines how courts should approach First Amendment cases in
schools and serves as a guidepost for districts assessing speech rules.
CASE REVIEW 4
Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 US 563 (1968)
What are the Facts of the Case?
:Pickering was a high school teacher employed by the Board of Education in Illinois. In
1961, he would write several letters to the editors of local newspapers criticizing the allocation of
school funds between athletics and academics. He also alleged that the school board was not
transparent in their use of public funds. As a result, he was dismissed by the school board.
Pickering then sued the board, claiming that his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech
were violated.
What are the Major Issues of the Case?
The Pickering v. Board of Education case involved significant issues related to the
balance between an individual's First Amendment rights to free speech and a public employer's
interests. The key question in Pickering v. Board of Education was whether or not Pickering's
criticism was protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. The First
Amendment requires us to protect the expression of opinion on matters of public interest, and
provides that such opinion should be freely expressed without fear of retaliatory dismissal by a
public employer (Marshall & Supreme Court of The United States, 1967). Additionally, it also
raised the issue of whether or not government employees have the right to speak out on matters
of public concern in the same way as private citizens. The case raised concerns about the extent
to which public employees can exercise their constitutional rights to free speech without being
subject to reprisals or disciplinary actions from their employer.
What was the Rationale Given about the Case?
The rationale for the decision in the Pickering v. Board of Education case was that public
employees have a First Amendment right to free speech, even if that speech is critical of their
CASE REVIEW 5
employer. The court emphasized that the government, as an employer, could not use its
authority to silence dissent or to punish individuals for expressing their views on matters of
public concern. The Supreme Court held that Pickering's letters addressed matters of public
concern, and thus were protected by his First Amendment right to free speech. Furthermore, the
court ruled that public employees have the right to comment on matters of public concern
without fear of retaliation from their employers. However, the court also recognized that
Pickering's statements caused disruption in the workplace and potentially harmed the relationship
between him and the school board.
What were the Holdings from the Judges?
The Supreme Court held that Pickering's dismissal was a violation of his constitutional
rights. The court ruled that government employees have the right to engage in public speech on
matters of public concern as long as they do not substantially interfere with the normal
operations of their agency. Furthermore, the court noted that the interest of the government as an
employer in regulating speech in the workplace at the expense of the right to speech on matters
of public concern must be carefully balanced.
Present Your Reaction to The Case?
: Pickering v. Board of Education is a significant case that established important principles
for employees' rights to freedom of speech. The ruling upheld that public employees have the
right to speak out on matters of public concern without fear of retaliation from their employers.
Additionally, the ruling also emphasized that the interest of the government as an employer in
regulating speech in the workplace must be balanced against the right to public speech on
matters of public concern. Therefore, this case offers an important precedent for the protection of
CASE REVIEW 6
constitutional rights within the workplace and the balanced regulation of speech in the interest of
both employers and their staff members.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)
What are the Facts of the Case?
Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark US Supreme Court case involving
segregation in American public schools. The named plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was a parent of a
black child who had been rejected from an all-white elementary school in Topeka, Kansas, due
to the school board's policy of segregation. Brown and other parents of black children filed a
lawsuit against the school board, arguing that segregation in public schools violated the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution.
What are the Major Issues of the Case?
The major issues of Brown v. Board of Education case were related to racial segregation
in public schools. The topic of racial segregation, being the ignition for the case, then led to
various questions that were essential to the case and its outcome. The key question in the case of
Brown v. Board of Education was whether the doctrine of separate but equal was constitutional
when applied to public education (Warren & Supreme Court of The United States, 1953).: Also
considered was the question of whether separate educational facilities for black and white
students, as mandated under the separate but equal doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson,
violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Essentially, the ultimate
question to be determined was whether the segregation of public schools based on race violated
the US Constitution. The case dealt with significant issues of social justice and injustice, as well
as constitutional interpretation. The topics discussed included but were not limited to considering
whether segregation perpetuated inequality, whether segregation created a psychological feeling
CASE REVIEW 7
of inferiority among black students, and whether segregation violated the rights of black students
having access to equal educational opportunities as compared to white students.
What was the Rationale Given about the Case?
The US Supreme Court ruled that segregation in public schools violated the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, holding that separate educational facilities are
inherently unequal (Warren & Supreme Court of The United States, 1953). In reaching this
conclusion, the court held that segregation had a detrimental effect on black children's education,
damaging their self-esteem and hindering the development of their talents. The court also found
that segregation resulted in black children being excluded from the benefits of public education,
which was a fundamental right. Furthermore, the court stated that although segregation did not
necessarily mean one race was inherently better than another, the question of whether
segregation does in fact create a feeling of inferiority depended on the effect of segregation itself
on public education (Warren & Supreme Court of The United States, 1953).
Present Your Reaction to The Case?
Brown v. Board of Education was a milestone of great success in civil rights history that
significantly impacted American society, especially for individuals of color. Not only did the
ruling invoke preeminent change by demonstrating true equality, but it also helped provide better
educationally opportunities for all students and promoted inclusivity in the school system.
Additionally, Brown v. Board of education served as a stepping stone for the world outside of
school systems. Though not its intent, the decision helped set a legal framework for the civil
rights movement to challenge segregation in other institutions and broaden equal protection
rights for all Americans. The Brown ruling demonstrated the legal power of the Constitution to
promote equality, and it established a significant precedent for dismantling institutionalized
CASE REVIEW 9
References
Fortas, A. & Supreme Court of The United States. (1968) U.S. Reports: Tinker v. Des Moines
School Dist., 393 U.S. 503. [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress.
https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep393503/.
Marshall, T. & Supreme Court of The United States. (1967) U.S. Reports: Pickering v. Board of
Education, 391 U.S. 563. [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress,
https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep391563/.
Warren, E. & Supreme Court of The United States. (1953) U.S. Reports: Brown v. Board of
Education, 347 U.S. 483. [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress,
https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep347483/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
