Discussion thread CJUS 610
DISCUSSION SSIGNMENT A INSTRUCTIONS
The student will complete 3 Discussions in this course. The student will post
one thread of at
least 400 words. For each thread, students must support their assertions with
at least 3 scholarly
citations in APA format. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 250
words. Each reply
must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation(s) in APA format. Any sources
cited must have
been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the
textbook, the Bible,
peer-reviewed articles from the Jerry Falwell Library, etc.
Peer one
Alton Ransom
MondayJul 4 at 10:34pm
Manage Discussion Entry
At one time, I was working in an organization where the supervisor could make decisions
without confronting the brutal facts. He could not give us chance to speak our side of the story
and defend ourselves. In this way, he did a lot of injustice to us. Besides, there was a broken trust
and a cit in communication because we felt that we will not be heard even if our ideas sounds
great.
I also worked in an organization where the supervisors could confront the brutal truths regardless
of whether they were good or bad. There was open and ongoing communication between the
employees and the top managers. The supervisors allowed the employees to air their opinions
concerning an issue. There was also room for feedback from employees which enabled the
supervisors to evaluate themselves and assess the areas they needed to improve on. This practice
led to great job satisfaction and workers were motivated to keep working for the organization.
The contrast between the two environments necessitates the need to confront the truth. For
example, in the first environment, the supervisors exercised a lot of dictatorships and viewed
their employees as inferior. It implies that their opinions could not be heard and the supervisor
