THE FINE ARTS AND THE STUDY OF THEOLOGY
Every Field Of Research has its array of subfields which are in constant flux due to the
hermeneutical character of the fields themselves. These subfields are identified not because of
intrinsic qualities but rather values adopted by scholars and their related communities. The
array of fields or subfields is often referred to as the “encyclopedia,” what Muller defined for
theology as “the complete circle of theological knowing, organized not alphabetically but in
terms of the interrelationships of the several subject areas of theology.”2 The history of the
development of the theological encyclopedia throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth
centuries reveals competing views on the subdivision of the discipline.3 Jacob Paul von
Gundling identified a twofold pattern, distinguishing between sciences of theory and practice,
that is, between doctrines of faith and rules for living. Friedrich Schleiermacher adopted a
threefold pattern, including practical, historical, and philosophical theology. Christoph Pfaff
outlined a fivefold pattern which included exegetical, dogmatic, polemical, church historical,
and pastoral theology. But it was the fourfold pattern that dominated the period and
ultimately captured the imagination of most theological institutions.4 These four core
subfields of theology identified by the early nineteenth-century Halle faculty in Germany
were exemplary, dividing theology into the disciplines of exegetical, dogmatic, historical, and
practical theology.
Within theology these disciplines could be plotted on a continuum between the two horizons
of protestant hermeneutics, with its emphasis on Sola Scriptura. On the one side lies the
horizon of Scripture and on the other the horizon of culture.5 Thus exegetical theology with
its program of explicating the meaning of the biblical text in its original contexts (historical,
literary, linguistic) is placed closest to the horizon of Scripture, while practical theology with
its agenda of exploring the implications of the faith for ministry and life within contemporary
contexts is placed closest to the horizon of culture. The discipline of systematic theology is
placed to the right of centre between these two horizons since it answers key questions raised
about Christian faith and practice within the present moment and cultural context. These
answers are arranged in an orderly way to express the faith in accurate and relevant ways for
a contemporary audience. The discipline of biblical theology could be placed to the left of
centre since it represents a synthetic level of connecting individual exegetical analyses. The
discipline of historical theology traces the history of all of these other theological disciplines
and so in some ways serves as a meta-discipline, even though it too is obviously influenced
by the cultural and scriptural horizons.6
Since the Reformation at least the priority and direction of order among these disciplines has
been clear within the Protestant church. The concern for Sola Scriptura placed emphasis on
the scriptural horizon. The direction of influence and authority was to proceed from the
scriptural horizon even if the issues of focus were obviously arising from the cultural horizon.
In this environment exegetical theology was given priority and there arose a sense that the
biblical text gave rise to theology. In reality though while Scripture was indeed the key
authority for the Protestant church, the interpretation of the text was still driven by the
concerns of exegetical theologians and the faith communities in which they lived. Greater
attention to the presuppositions of those engaged in exegetical theology has become
increasingly important and is often noted at the outset of any serious academic work, often
reflected in the articulation of one’s methodology for studying the Bible. Tracing the history
of exegetical methodology (using this adjective loosely) is instructive for it makes clear the
cultural lens through which scholars are reading the text. Post-Enlightenment exegesis
prioritized historical and linguistic study of the Scriptures, captured in the “grammatico-
historical method” that dominated much of the modern era. The control of historical and
linguistic approaches to exegesis, however, was loosened in the second half of the twentieth
century, first with the shift from historical to literary and sociological approaches, and then
from literary and sociological approaches to ideological approaches. Methodologies for
reading the biblical text have increased considerably in the past few decades, showing the
interdisciplinary nature of biblical studies. It may be questioned whether all these forms of
biblical studies should still be considered exegetical theology, since the theological enterprise
does not always appear to be the goal of such methods, but in general those using these
methods have found ways to connect the results to theological reflection or at least to the
cultural horizon. This shift in biblical studies reveals that the direction of influence is not
merely from the horizon of Scripture to that of culture, but that the cultural horizon has
played a role in shaping the methods and perspectives of those studying Scripture.
In the month prior to the Bingham Colloquium captured in this volume, the walls of
McMaster Divinity College were taken over by a cadre of friendly artists. It began quiet and
subtle enough, but soon the art dominated our space. And in the midst of this artistic
environment we continued to carry on our theological study within our academic disciplines.
In this context I have been prompted to ask: what does this artistic expression have to do with
theology? Or what does Marc Chagall have to do with Brevard Childs?
In the traditional approach to the theological encyclopedia, the cultural horizon has largely
been dominated by the discipline of practical theology, with its sub disciplines of missiology,
ethics, pastoral studies, homiletics, liturgics, etc. But the present conference which showcases
the fine arts and their contribution to faith reveals the need for space within the theological
encyclopedia for the fine arts as a reflection of and on the horizon of culture.
The fine arts have traditionally been incorporated into theological studies as part of
worldview studies which provides opportunities to reflect “Christianly” upon all of culture
and creation.7 In this approach theology creates a framework for how to engage the fine arts,
and the hermeneutical movement is from Christian theology to the fine arts.8 However, the
hermeneutical admission that the cultural horizon has always played a major role in the
practice of not only practical and systematic theology, but also exegetical theology has
opened the way for considering further impact from cultural enterprises. Our experiment
during the period surrounding the Bingham Colloquium is an important reminder of the ways
in which the fine arts have provided new strategies for doing theology and especially reading
the biblical text, and this work seeks to trace some of the key contributions of the fine arts
and provide reflection on the enduring legacy of these contributions.
Just as theology, so the fine arts as an academic discipline has its own encyclopedia. It
appears that the sub-fields of literary, visual, musical, and dramatic arts have had the most
impact on the discipline of theology and so these sub-fields will be our focus as a way to
showcase the impact of the fine arts on disciplines of theology.
LITERARY ARTS
The literary arts have impacted the field of theology most likely due to the dominance of
textual forms (Bible, theological treatises) in the theological disciplines. The narrative
approach to systematic theology was fostered especially through the work of the Yale School,
including George Lindbeck, Hans Frei, and David Kelsey and extended further by Hauerwas,
among others.9 But this narrative impact can also be discerned within the field of practical
theology, often sub-divided into three main streams. The first uses narrative forms in practical
ministry and religious communication (like preaching and pastoral care). The second involves
empirical analysis and deconstruction of religious subjectivity that is inherent to narrative.
The third empowers marginalized voices by creating an audience for their stories.10
This narrative approach is part of a broader trend of poetics within practical theology. Poetics
not only includes narrative elements (narrative structure, genre, plot, and characterization),
but also “the dynamics of image, metaphor, and symbols in the creation of art.”11 Donald
Capps’s intriguing volume The Poet’s Gift: Toward the Renewal of Pastoral Care, highlights
the resources available in poetry that move the theological discipline from abstract discourse
to immediate experience.12 Our own poetic practical theologian at McMaster Divinity
College, Phil Zylla, a disciple of Capps, showcases how poetry offers new ways to engage the
discipline of practical theology.13 So also narrative has influenced the field of homiletics,
leading to the narrative style of preaching.14
Methods related to the literary arts have exerted considerable influence upon the study of the
Bible, as the appropriation of methods used to study narratives and poetry within modern
literary departments are now well established as methods for studying both the Old Testament
and New Testament narratives.15 In Old Testament study, this was fostered especially by
Jewish scholars such as Meir Sternberg, Robert Alter, Shimon Bar-Efrat, and Adele Berlin,
but also many others including J. P. Fokkelman, David Gunn and Danna Fewell, and Jerome
Walsh.16 In recent years there has been considerable interest in Russian formalists like
Mikhail Bakhtin,17 and other streams influenced by narrative study such as Autobiographical
and Perspective Criticism.18 The study of poetry has also impacted research on the Bible,
especially as seen in the work of Robert Alter, Adele Berlin, James Kugel, Wilfred Watson, as
well as the more recent work of F. W. Dobbs-Allsopp.19
Influence from the literary arts on the field of theology was natural due to the emphasis
within theology on text, whether the biblical text or the rich tradition of written theological
treatises throughout the two millennia of the church. But other forms of art have also
contributed to the study of theology and increasingly so in recent decades.
VISUAL ARTS
A relationship between theology and the visual arts is not difficult to trace since the visual
arts during the Christian era have drawn much inspiration from biblical and theological
witnesses.20 However, the direction of influence has not been strictly from theology to visual
art as theories related to visual art have been leveraged to explain the theological
enterprise.21
Again, Donald Capps highlights the way visual arts informs practical theology as he draws on
theories of art and artistic creativity.22 Capps, for instance, draws on Rudolf Arnheim’s
approach to the compositional structure of paintings as a way to understand the relationship
between theology and psychology.
Visual art has influenced systematic theology as well. Edward Farley speaks of “theological
portraiture” when seeking to describe theological reflection in ways other than abstract
doctrine and instead in terms “of a picture, less a photograph than an impressionistic
painting.” Furthermore:
Portraiture is itself a constantly changing enterprise. It resembles an artist constantly redoing
a portrait and even offering new portraits of a child who is growing up. We need not conclude
from this metaphor, however, that the process of change in the history of Christianity is
necessarily one of maturation. Further, the focus of the portrait is not on essence, a kernel in a
husk. Yet the portrait does try to capture the unity, the interrelation of features. The result, if
successful—the face staring out of the portrait—is ecclesiality.23
Citing the address of Langdon Gilkey to the Art Institute of Chicago, John Dillenberger
reminds us that art’s contribution to theology lies not merely in illustration of attained
knowledge, but in their approach to their craft since art “makes us see in new and different
ways, below the surface and beyond the obvious.”24 Dillenberger continues by highlighting
the key role that visual arts have played in the prolegomena and analysis of systematic
theologians ranging from Hans Urs von Balthasar and Paul Tillich to John Cobb and Mark C.
Taylor.
Exegetical theology has also been influenced by the visual arts. Fiona Black and Cheryl
Exum’s “Semiotics in Stained Glass” highlights the role that a visual art tradition can play in
tracing the reception history of a text like Song of Songs.25 In recent years iconographic
analysis has arisen from the discipline of art history where it was championed by Erwin
Panofsky.26 It is increasingly used by biblical scholars and scholars of the ancient Near East
to read biblical texts against the backdrops of visual art in antiquity.27
MUSICAL ARTS
Wendy Porter has provided a helpful overview of the close relationship between music and
theology, highlighting particularly “composers in the role of interpreter of the Bible,” since
the “composer, in writing sacred music, has had the unique opportunity of engaging
intellectually with the text at a theological level by composing a musical work that recreates
the text in some new form. In this new form, the composer sets out for performance and for
evaluation a personal or collective interpretation of the biblical text.”28 Jeremy Begbie notes
the role that music can play in the formation of one’s theology, asking “how can the world of
music enrich Christian thinking? How can it help us explore, discover, and understand more
deeply the great drama of the Christian faith?”29 In light of this tradition of theological
interpretation in artistic form, musical arts have provided insight into how theologians have
approached their discipline.
Particularly helpful have been insights from the dynamics of performance within music to
shape approaches to practical theology,30 whether that is reflection on the Eucharist by
Nicholas Lash or on homiletics by Frances Young.31 Young in particular leverages insights
from music improvisation as well as the use of cadenzas in concertos to illuminate dynamics
within preaching and interpretation.32 This trend of drawing on musical performance for
theological prolegomena is also evident in systematic theology as exemplified in the works of
individuals like Philip Stoltzfus who notes the role of music in the hermeneutical framework
of Schleiermacher, Karl Barth, and Ludwig Wittgenstein, and one can see a similar trend in
von Balthasar who draws on Mozart and the image of the symphony to describe theology.33
For Stoltzfus musical performance is akin to theology in that it “resists satisfactory
expression in propositional form.”34 Maeve Louise Heaney has leveraged the aesthetic
within the epistemological framework of Bernard Lonergan as the basis for drawing on
insights in music studies for theological method.35 The musical arts have also impacted the
sub discipline of exegetical theology. This impact is seen in the use of musical compositions
when tracing the reception history of biblical texts, for instance, the use of biblical texts and
themes in Handel’s Messiah.36 It is also seen in the rise of the field of archaeomusicology
which explores music cultures and uses this information to shape interpretation of biblical
texts, alongside other texts in antiquity.37
DRAMATIC ARTS
As seen in the previous section on musical arts, the dynamics of performance have played a
role in shaping theological method and discovery and this extends as well to the dramatic
arts.38 The impact of dramatic performance is exemplified within practical and systematic
theology in von Balthasar’s five volume Theo-drama: Theological Drama Theory.39 In drama
he finds the dynamics that help capture the relationship within the Trinity as well as between
God and creation, using plot, characters, and dialogue. Interestingly, von Balthasar traces his
interest in the intersection between the arts and theology to his Jesuit training which he
considered “the desert of neo-scholasticism.”40 Kevin Vanhoozer is another who has
employed a dramatic model for understanding the role of doctrine within the church which
invites individuals and communities to participate in the drama of God’s renewal through
Jesus Christ.41
The impact of the dramatic arts, however, is also evident in exegetical theologians both on the
synthetic level of biblical theology and on the analytical level of biblical exegesis. N. T.
Wright uses the image of a Shakespearean drama to set the agenda for theological application
of the Scriptures. For Wright the Scriptures are the initial acts of a play lacking its final
scenes. The absent scenes comprise the post-biblical experience of the church and these
scenes are written by paying attention faithfully to the dramatic style of the earlier acts, not
merely repeating the earlier scenes but producing new scenes in line with the earlier style.42
Craig Bartholomew and Michael Goheen appropriate a similar model in their biblical
theological contribution entitled The Drama of Scripture. They trace this drama across three
Old Testament acts (creation, fall, redemption initiated), through an interlude (the
Intertestamental Period), and finally through three New Testament acts (redemption
accomplished, the mission of the church, and redemption completed).43 Many biblical
scholars have experimented with what has come to be known as Performance Criticism,
drawing especially on performance dynamics from the dramatic arts to analyze biblical
texts.44 Jeanette Mathews provides a helpful overview of the field, identifying two major
streams: the performance of biblical traditions and performance in biblical traditions. The
performance of biblical traditions stream has typically looked at the performance of biblical
texts in a modern context, although taking its lead from the oral origins of biblical traditions
and thus the performative dimension of its origins.45 This latter aspect, performance in
biblical traditions, is exemplified in a variety of exegetical works, whether on individual
pericopae,46 whole books,47 or canonical sections.48 This approach has highlighted
theatrical qualities within these texts.49
CONCLUSION
As mentioned at the outset there are other art forms which could be mentioned, but these four
forms, literary, visual, musical, and dramatic arts have exerted the most influence on the
discipline of theology, from practical to systematic to biblical to exegetical theology. There
are several implications for the role of the arts in theology. First of all, the arts provide
models for understanding the task of theology, whether practical, systematic, biblical, or
exegetical theology. One can discern consistent influence from the arts on theological
prolegomena and biblical hermeneutics, which provide heuristic frameworks and
sensibilities, as well as methods and procedures for producing theology and interpretation.
Second, the arts also provide models for understanding the shape of theology so that the
actual content of theology can be described through artistic forms. Third, artistic expressions
of theology, canonical and otherwise, provide new interpretations of texts and theology that
can prompt further reflection on these theological sources and also encourage their
application within specific cultural contexts. Finally, participation in and enjoyment of the
arts have the potential to open up the minds and hearts of theologians for reading and
performing the foundational texts of the Christian tradition.
The theological encyclopedia has been restricted to the four disciplines of exegetical,
historical, systematic, and practical theology, and often the direction of influence, especially
for those in the Protestant traditions, has been from exegetical to practical theology. By
tracing the influence of the cultural disciplines of the arts, it is apparent that there is a need
for expansion of the disciplines of theology as well as the direction of influence which need
not be unidirectional. There is a role for the arts in the fusion of the cultural and scriptural
horizons.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York: Basic, 1981.
———. The Art of Biblical Poetry. New York: Basic, 1985.
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory. 5 vols. San Francisco:
Ignatius, 1988–1998.
———. Truth Is Symphonic: Aspects of Christian Pluralism. San Francisco: Ignatius, 1987.
Baltzer, Klaus. Deutero-Isaiah: A Commentary on Isaiah 40–55. Hermeneia. Minneapolis:
Fortress, 2001.
Bar-Efrat, Shimeon. Narrative Art in the Bible. London: T. & T. Clark, 2004.
Begbie, Jeremy. Resounding Truth: Christian Wisdom in the World of Music. EC. Grand
Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007.
———. Voicing Creation’s Praise: Towards a Theology of the Arts. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark,
1991.
Berlin, Adele. The Dynamics of Biblical Parallelism. Revised and Expanded. Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans, 2007.
———. Poetics and Interpretation of Biblical Narrative. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns,
1994.
Black, Fiona C., and J. Cheryl Exum. “Semiotics in Stained Glass: Edward Burne-Jones’s
Song of Songs.” In Biblical Studies/Cultural Studies: The Third Sheffield Colloquium, edited
by Cheryl Exum and Stephen D. Moore, 315–42. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1998.
Boer, Roland, ed. Bakhtin and Genre Theory in Biblical Studies. SBLSS 63. Atlanta: Society
of Biblical Literature, 2007.
Boomershine, Thomas E. “All Scholarship Is Personal: David Rhoads and Performance
Criticism.” CTM 37 (2010) 279–87.
Braun, Joachim. Die Musikkultur Altisraels/Palästinas: Studien zu archäologischen,
schriftlichen und vergleichenden Quellen. OBO 164. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht,
1999.
Broadhead, Bradley K. Jazz and Christian Freedom: Improvising against the Grain of the
West. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2018.
Brummitt, Mark. “Showman or Shaman? The Acts of a Biblical Prophet.” In The Meanings
of Magic: From the Bible to Buffalo Bill, edited by Amy Wygant, 55–68. New York:
Berghahn, 2006.
Butt, John. “George Friedric Handel and The Messiah.” In The Oxford Handbook of the
Reception History of the Bible, edited by Michael Lieb et al., 294–306. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2011.
Capps, Donald. At Home in the World: A Study in Psychoanalysis, Religion, and Art. Eugene,
OR: Cascade, 2013.
———. “The Lessons of Art Theory for Pastoral Theology.” PP 47 (1999) 321–46.
———. “The Lessons of Artistic Creativity for Pastoral Theologians.” PP 59 (2010) 249–64.
———. The Poet’s Gift: Toward the Renewal of Pastoral Care. Louisville: Westminster John
Knox, 1993.
De Gruchy, John W. “Theology and the Visual Arts.” In The Modern Theologians: An
Introduction to Christian Theology since 1918, edited by David Ford and Rachel Muers, 706–
18. 3rd ed. GT. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005.
De Hulster, Izaak J. Iconographic Exegesis and Third Isaiah. FAT 2/36. Tübingen: Mohr
Siebeck, 2009.
De Hulster, Izaak J., et al., eds. Iconographic Exegesis of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament:
An Introduction to Its Method and Practice. VRA. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht,
2015.
Dillenberger, John. A Theology of Artistic Sensibilities: The Visual Arts and the Church. New
York: Crossroad, 1986.
Doan, William, and Terry Giles. “Masking God: The Application of Drama Theory to Biblical
Texts.” Proceedings 22 (2002) 127–45.
———. “Prophecy and Theater.” JRS 2 (2000). No pages.
https://dspace2.creighton.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10504/64429/2000–2.pdf?sequence=1.
———. Prophets, Performance, and Power: Performance Criticism of the Hebrew Bible.
London: T. & T. Clark, 2005.
———. “The Song of Asaph: A Performance-Critical Analysis of 1 Chronicles 16:8–36.”
CBQ 70 (2008) 29–43.
Dobbs-Allsopp, F. W. On Biblical Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Dumbrill, Richard J., and Yumiko Higano. The Archaeomusicology of the Ancient Near East.
2nd ed. Victoria, BC: Trafford, 2005.
Farley, Edward. Ecclesial Reflection: An Anatomy of Theological Method. Philadelphia:
Fortress, 1982.
———. The Fragility of Knowledge: Theological Education in the Church and the
University. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988.
Fokkelman, J. P. Reading Biblical Narrative: A Practical Guide. TBS. Leiden: Deo, 1999.
Frei, Hans W. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth
Century Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.
Ganzevoort, R. Ruard. Religious Stories We Live By: Narrative Approaches in Theology and
Religious Studies. 19th ed. STR 19. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
———. “Narrative Approaches.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Practical Theology,
edited by Bonnie J. Miller-McLemore, 214–23. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
García-Rivera, Alex. A Wounded Innocence: Sketches for a Theology of Art. Collegeville,
MN: Liturgical, 2003.
Giles, Terry, and William Doan. “Performance Criticism of the Hebrew Bible.” RC 2 (2008)
273–86.
———. Twice Used Songs: Performance Criticism of the Songs of Ancient Israel. Peabody,
MA: Hendrickson, 2008.
Gilkey, Langdon. “Art, Creativity, and the Sacred: An Anthology in Religion and Art.” In Art,
Creativity, and the Sacred: An Anthology in Religion and Art, edited by Diane Apostolos-
Cappadona, 187–92. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 1984.
Gottwald, Norman K. “Tragedy and Comedy in the Latter Prophets.” Semeia 32 (1984) 83–
96.
Graves, Mike, and Schlafer, David J., eds. What’s the Shape of Narrative Preaching? Essays
in Honor of Eugene L. Lowry. St. Louis: Chalice, 2008.
Green, Barbara. Mikhail Bakhtin and Biblical Scholarship: An Introduction. SBLSS 38.
Atlanta: Scholars, 2000.
Gunn, D. M., and Danna Nolan Fewell. Narrative in the Hebrew Bible. OBS. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1993.
Harley, Felicity. “Art and Interpretation.” In Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and
Interpretation, edited by Stanley E. Porter, 27–29. London: Routledge, 2006.
Harrington, Thomas W. “The Way to God or God’s Way to Us: The Theologies of Edward
Farley and James McClendon in Critical Dialogue.” PhD diss., Marquette University, 2011.
Hauerwas, Stanley, and L. Gregory Jones. Why Narrative? Readings in Narrative Theology.
Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989.
Heaney, Maeve Louise. “Music and Theological Method: A Lonerganian Approach.” TS 77
(2016) 678–703.
Henrici, Peter. “Hans Urs von Balthasar: A Sketch of His Life.” Communio 16 (1989) 306–
50.
Hornsby, Teresa J. “Ezekiel Off-Broadway.” BCT 2 (2006) 1–8.
Horsley, Richard A., et al., eds. Performing the Gospel: Orality, Memory, and Mark.
Minneapolis: Fortress, 2006.
House, Paul R. “Dramatic Coherence in Nahum, Habakkuk, and Zephaniah.” In Forming
Prophetic Literature: Essays on Isaiah and the Twelve in Honor of John D. W. Watts, edited
by James W. Watts and Paul R. House, 195–208. JSOTSup 235. Sheffield: Sheffield
Academic, 1996.
———. Zephaniah: A Prophetic Drama. BLS 16. Sheffield: Almond, 1989.
Howison, Jamie. God’s Mind in That Music: Theological Exploration through the Music of
John Coltrane. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2012.
Kelsey, David H. “Biblical Narrative and Theological Anthropology.” In Scriptural Authority
and Narrative Interpretation, edited by Garrett Green, 121–43. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987.
Kitzberger, Ingrid, ed. Autobiographical Biblical Criticism: Between Text and Self. Leiden:
Deo, 2002.
Kreitzer, Larry J. “Film and Interpretation.” In Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and
Interpretation, edited by Stanley E. Porter, 108–10. London: Routledge, 2006.
Kugel, James L. The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and Its History. New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1981.
Lai, Barbara M. Leung. Through the ‘I’–Window: The Inner Life of Characters in the Hebrew
Bible. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2011.
Lang, Bernhard. Monotheism and the Prophetic Minority: An Essay in Biblical History and
Sociology. SWBA 1. Sheffield: Almond, 1983.
———. “Street Theater, Raising the Dead, and the Zoroastrian Connection in Ezekiel’s
Prophecy.” In Ezekiel and His Book: Textual and Literary Criticism and Their Interrelation,
edited by J. Lust, 297–316. BETL 74. Leuven: Peeters, 1986.
Lash, Nicholas. Theology on the Way to Emmaus. London: SCM, 1986.
Lee, Sang Uk. “Aesthetic Interdisciplinarity in Donald Capps’ Weltanschauung.” PP 58
(2009) 491–504.
Lindbeck, George A. The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age.
Philadelphia: Westminster, 1984.
Loughlin, Gerard. Telling God’s Story: Bible, Church, and Narrative Theology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Lynch, Danielle Anne. God in Sound and Silence: Music as Theology. Eugene, OR:
Pickwick, 2018.
Marguerat, Daniel, and Yvan Bourquin. How to Read Bible Stories: An Introduction to
Narrative Criticism. London: SCM, 1999.
Mathews, Jeanette. Performing Habakkuk: Faithful Re-Enactment in the Midst of Crisis.
Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2012.
McCuistion, Paul R., et al. “The Influence of Greek Drama on Matthew’s Gospel.” HTSTS
70 (2014) 1–9.
Muller, Richard A. The Study of Theology: From Biblical Interpretation to Contemporary
Formulation. 7th ed. FCI. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1991.
Packer, J. I. “When God’s Voice Is Heard: The Power of Preaching.” In The Preacher as
Theologian, edited by Chris Green and David Jackman, 79–95. Leicester: InterVarsity Press,
1995.
Panofsky, Erwin. Studies in Iconology: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. 7th
ed. MFLH 7. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939.
Pasala, Solomon. The Drama of the Messiah in Matthew 8 and 9: A Study from a
Communicative Perspective. EUS23T 866. New York: Peter Lang, 2008.
Porter, Wendy J. “Music and Interpretation.” In Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and
Interpretation, edited by Stanley E. Porter, 231–35. London: Routledge, 2006.
Resseguie, James L. Narrative Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction. Grand
Rapids: Baker Academic, 2005.
Rhoads, David M. “Performance Criticism: An Emerging Methodology in Second Testament
Studies.” BTB 36 (2006) 118–33.
———. “Performance Criticism: An Emerging Methodology in Second Testament Studies
Part II.” BTB 36 (2006) 164–84.
———. “Performance Events in Early Christianity: New Testament Writings in an Oral
Context.” In The Interface of Orality and Writing: Speaking, Seeing, Writing in the Shaping
of New Genres, 166–93. BPCS 11. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.
Shelton, Pauline. “Making a Drama out of a Crisis? A Consideration of the Book of Job as a
Drama.” JSOT 24 (1999) 69–82.
Sherwood, Yvonne. The Prostitute and the Prophet: Hosea’s Marriage in Literary-Theoretical
Perspective. GCT 2. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1996.
Stacey, W. D. Prophetic Drama in the Old Testament. London: Epworth, 1990.
Standing, Roger. Finding the Plot: Preaching in a Narrative Style. Eugene, OR: Wipf and
Stock, 2012.
Sternberg, Meir. The Poetics of Biblical Narrative: Ideological Literature and the Drama of
Reading. ILBS. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.
Stibbe, Mark W. G. John as Storyteller: Narrative Criticism and the Fourth Gospel. SNTSMS
73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Stoltzfus, Philip Edward. Theology as Performance: Music, Aesthetics, and God in Western
Thought. London: T. & T. Clark, 2006.
Stroup, George W. The Promise of Narrative Theology: Recovering the Gospel in the Church.
Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1997.
Thiselton, Anthony C. The Two Horizons: New Testament Hermeneutics and Philosophical
Description with Special Reference to Heidegger, Bultmann, Gadamer, and Wittgenstein.
Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980.
Utzschneider, Helmut. Michas Reise in die Zeit: Studien zum Drama als Genre der
Prophetischen Literatur des Alten Testaments. SBS 180. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk,
1999.
Van Deventer, Cornelia. “Embracing Vulnerability: A Drama Analysis of the Johannine
Prologue and Crucifixion Scenes.” DTh diss., Stellenbosch University, 2018.
Vanhoozer, Kevin J. The Drama of Doctrine: A Canonical-Linguistic Approach to Christian
Theology. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2005.
Walsh, Jerome T. Old Testament Narrative: A Guide to Interpretation. Louisville: Westminster
John Knox, 2010.
Walton, Heather. “Poetics.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Practical Theology, edited
by Bonnie J. Miller-McLemore, 173–82. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
Watkins, James M. Creativity as Sacrifice: Toward a Theological Model for Creativity in the
Arts. ES. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2015.
Watson, Wilfred G. E. Classical Hebrew Poetry: A Guide to Its Techniques. JSOTSup 26.
Sheffield: JSOT, 1984.
Watts, John D. W. Isaiah 1–33. Rev. ed. WBC 24. Waco, TX: Word, 2005.
Wisse, Maarten. “Narrative Theology and the Use of the Bible in Systematic Theology.” AD
5 (2005) 237–48.
Wood, Joyce Rilett. “Speech and Action in Micah’s Prophecy.” CBQ 62 (2000) 645–62.
Wright, N. T. “How Can the Bible Be Authoritative?” VoxEv 21 (1991) 7–32.
Yamasaki, Gary. Perspective Criticism: Point of View and Evaluative Guidance in Biblical
Narrative. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2012.
Young, Frances M. The Art of Performance: Towards a Theology of Holy Scripture. London:
Darton Longman & Todd, 1990.
Zylla, Phil. “Explorations in the Aesthetic Pastoral Theology of Donald E. Capps.” JRH 57
(2017) 538–50.