Literature Review: Cultural and Economic Conditions Affecting Supply Chain
BUSI 740: Managing the Supply Chain
School of Business, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA
Dr. Thomas Scotts
October 5th, 2025
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 1
Abstract
Supply chain management has experienced significant disruptions across many industries
because of the increased influence by the behavioral dimensions of cultural diversity and global
economic fluctuations. This literature review will have an emphasis on cultural and economic
variables, supported by scholarly references published between 2001 and 2025. This review
considers factors such as terrorism, humanitarian practices, cultural management, religious
influences, the Covid-19 pandemic, communication and compatibility, recessionary cycles,
volatility in financial markets, and the adoption of circular economy principles. Documented
disruptions include labor shortages along with imbalances in supply and demand, however, the
existing body of the research is focused on isolated cultural and economic impacts. Therefore,
further empirical research is needed to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the
ways cultural and economic dimensions together influence the effectiveness and resilience of
supply chain management.
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 2
An essential component of an organization’s operations is their supply chain
management. In today’s global economy, supply chains extend across multiple countries,
exposing them to shifting economic conditions and diverse cultural influences. Furthermore, the
supply chain network, consisting of suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and
consumers, are all interdependent, therefore, because of their interconnectedness, if there is
any misinterpretation of cultural norms or traditions, it can upset or disrupt the entire supply
chain. Additionally, economic fluctuations can influence the availability of raw materials,
consumer demand, trade values, and financial decision-making.
The main issue addressed in this literature review is the influence of cultural and
economic conditions on supply chain performance. The specific focus is on managing cultural
challenges like cross-cultural relationships, communications, compatibility, terrorism,
humanitarian organization, and religious considerations. Furthermore, economic factors that
will be discussed will include the circular economy, Covid-19 pandemic, recessions, and financial
market volatility. Currently, global supply chains face many constraints like the shortage of raw
materials and labor, increases in demand which are triggered by cultural and economic
uncertainty, and the increase of government and regulatory laws and statutes.
Recent research highlights the severity of these challenges. Companies across many
industries and sectors are experiencing delays of six to eight weeks for merchandise, empty
shelves, longer delivery times, and increasing costs. Further research indicates that disruptions
to the supply chain have increased suddenly, for instance, in 2020 disruptions increased by
more than sixty percent (Taqi et al., 2020). Additionally, disruptions span labor and
manufacturing capacity, raw material availability, shipping, transportation, and logistics, which
are all molded by the economic and cultural forces.
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 3
Cultural Impacts on Supply Chain
With manufacturing operations being increasingly outsourced to various countries
worldwide, new challenges have been introduced to companies. One such challenge is cultural
differences that companies face as they expand their businesses globally. When these
differences are not effectively managed or addressed, companies run the risk of losing
profitability, customer trust, and industry contracts. Therefore, it is essential for companies to
develop effective cultural awareness and management, especially in the global economies.
Mitigation Plan for Cultural Differences
According to Durach et al., “One of the most significant challenges in global supply chain
management has emerged between the Western countries and China because of their extreme
cultural differences” (Durach et al., 2017). As companies expand their supply chains across
international borders, it is increasingly important for companies to develop their ability to
navigate cultural variations. Differences in how Western and Chinese partners interpret and
respond to discussions and negotiations are delayed, and can lead to the companies’ missing
deadlines, defects in products, resulting in a weakened relationship between the organization
and their manufacturers (Durach et al., 2017). These challenges highlight how essential it is to
understand cultural behaviors, making it an imperative component in supply chain resilience.
To address these challenges, several studies have proposed mitigation strategies
focusing on five primary areas: relation-specific investments, knowledge sharing,
complementary resources, effective governance, and managing legal uncertainty (Durach et al.,
2017; Nguyen et al., 2021; Wong et al., 2017). Combined, these approaches provide practical
ways for companies to strengthen cross-cultural collaboration. Relation-specific investment
involves initiatives like training suppliers and manufacturing partners in culturally appropriate
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 4
greetings and creating visual communication methods to overcome language barriers.
Knowledge sharing contains professional development programs that encourage professionals
from different countries to share and exchange their insights about workplace practices and
cultural practices, which can be shared and taught within their respective companies.
Complementary resources focus on networking opportunities like inter-organizational
associations or joint lunches, to promote collaboration, build stronger partnerships, and to
understand one another’s weaknesses and strengths. Effective governance emphasizes building
trust through partnerships and the creation and establishment of standardized practices. Lastly,
legal uncertainty entails companies dedicating resources to understanding international
frameworks and creating proactive procedures to minimize tensions caused by regulatory
changes.
Additionally, further research has shown there to be four key cultural distinctions
between Western and Eastern approaches to organizational relationships and the supply chain.
First, Western companies typically believe that trust must exist prior to information and
knowledge is shared between entities, whereas Eastern companies typically believe that sharing
information and knowledge is a pathway to building trust. Secondly, business relationships in
Western cultures are more impersonal, while Eastern cultures highlight the importance of
formal and personal interactions. Third, Western companies are more goal-oriented, whereas
their Eastern counterparts place greater emphasis on trust-based relationships. Lastly, the
interpretation of contracts is viewed differently. Western companies rely on contracts as binding
governance, while Eastern companies view contracts as flexible foundations that evolve over
time (Shareef et al., 2019).
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 5
Together, these findings demonstrate that cultural perspectives directly impact business
practices, governance structures, and relationship management in global supply chains.
Furthermore, much literature indicates that the interactions between Western and Eastern
companies have improved significantly in recent years. Technological advancements and the
adoptions of more comprehensive cultural mitigation strategies within companies have
contributed to reducing cultural divides and strengthened global supply chain collaboration
(John et al., 2019; Shareef et al., 2019; Wong et al., 2017). This illustrates the importance of
continual cultural integration, especially as global supply chains grow in complexity.
Communication and Cultural Compatibility
In supply chain management, relationships between buyers and suppliers play vital roles
in a company’s success. Covid-19 pandemic proved this, as many companies realized the
importance of having strong partnerships with their supply chain, to ensure sustainability.
Suppliers are vital because companies depend on their raw materials, to be able to produce
products. Therefore, building trust and maintaining a healthy buyer/supplier relationship can be
seen as an essential factor in a company’s success.
Cultural challenges have been identified as one of the most influential factors shaping
the buyer/supplier relationship, specifically in how information and communication is
exchanged between the parties. Cultural differences not only influence the effectiveness of the
partnerships, but they can also affect the business strategy, vision, and mission of the company.
Research has emphasized that supply chain collaboration and cross-cultural communication are
two essential elements that can either strengthen or undermine these relationships (Nguyen et
al., 2021). Open communications between parties can build mutual understanding, allowing the
buyer and supplier to feel respected and represented. In multicultural partnerships, honesty,
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 6
and transparency in addressing disputes are essential, as they create opportunities to resolve
issues prior to formal agreements and contracts are established. Conversely, many dissolutions
between the buyer/supplier relationships happen when one party feels disadvantaged, typically
from miscommunication or the absence of a collaborative environment.
One major cultural difference is the imbalance between service and sales priorities.
Western organizations place significant value on customer service, however, put more emphasis
on sales outcomes equally or more than customer service. In contrast, Eastern cultures prioritize
long-term relationships with their customers, and suppliers, loyalty, and service quality above
the sales results. These differences illustrate the importance of a company investing time in
understanding and adapting to cultural expectations, to fit the market they are targeting.
Mitigation strategies proposed in the literature include fostering consistent and
transparent communication, leveraging technology and knowledge-sharing for mutual benefit,
honoring contractual and legal obligations, conducting regular reviews of goals and deliverables,
and establishing a shared vision and mission that all parties endorse (Nguyen et al., 2021; Wong
et al., 2017). By implementing these practices, companies can improve their buyer/supplier
collaboration and strengthen their overall resilience of the supply chain.
Terrorism Culture on Supply Chain
Since 2001, terrorism and its impact on supply chains have received increasing attention
in literature (Zegordi & Davarani, 2012). Although scholars have not reached a universal
definition of supply chain risk, most would agree that risk incorporates any factors that would
negatively impact or disrupt supply chain operations (Khan et al., 2018; Zegordi & Davarzani,
2012). Terrorism has been identified as one of the world’s top five supply chain risks (World
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 7
Economic Forum, 2013). Therefore, terrorism can be described as a cultural tactic used to create
fear and uncertainty in individuals, companies, and societies, with the purpose of creating
disruptions that yield political and economic advantages (Khan et al., 2018; Zegordi & Davarzani,
2012).
Studies have shown that terrorist events in more than one-hundred twelve countries
have created substantial supply chain disruptions, which provide terrorists with political and
economic advantages (Khan et al., 2018). Terrorist acts have a negative effect that ripples across
economies, which creates instability in markets and supply networks. Much like warfare,
terrorism is strategically employed to weaken supply chain reliability, destabilize governments,
and create a sense of uncertainty, and disruption within society.
In the aftermath of terrorism, these challenges are often intensified, fostering a culture
of fer and panic. Consumers typically shift from purchasing products on an as-need basis to
purchasing out of fear of scarcity, which exacerbates shortages by creating unnecessary spikes in
demand, which puts even more stress on supply chains.
Literature on terrorism-related supply chain risks highlight the urgency for strategies that
create and build resilience against disruptions. It is essential for companies to develop a robust
supply chain framework and business model to ensure a reduction in vulnerabilities and
safeguard operations from impulsive threats from terrorism.
Humanitarian Supply Chain Culture
Humanitarian supply chain management (HSCM) is the coordination and delivery of aid
to vulnerable populations following a disaster, whether it is natural such as hurricanes,
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 8
droughts, wildfires, health-related disasters like pandemics, or manmade such as warfare and
terrorism.
The mission of HSCM is to ensure that resources are distributed efficiently and the direst needs
of the affected population are prioritized (John et al., 2019).
Recently, HSCM has experienced an increase in challenges as global supply chains and
resources have become more strained. Simultaneous events, like natural disasters; the
pandemic, and the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, has created an increase in levels
of uncertainty and urgency. The overlap of these events has placed immense strain on various
economies, industries, and supply chains, which have already experienced struggles meeting
their routine demand while also providing additional humanitarian assistance to these regions.
Research has shown that effective humanitarian response requires strong centralization
and a clear command structure (John et al., 2019). However, global systems may remain
unprepared for such complex demands, like the world experienced during the pandemic. A
major obstacle that needs to be remedied is the poor sharing of information between key
actors.
Agencies like the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OSHA), the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), military forces, non-governmental organizations like
the Red Cross, governmental programs, and faith-based organization like churches, all provide
some sort of large-scale disaster relief, however, their limited share of vital information and lack
of coordination consistently hinders effective relief for affected communities.
While each agency seeks to maximize their impact, the absence of collaborative
strategies has weakened humanitarian logistics. Organization for effective disaster response
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 9
remains inconsistent globally, which limits the ability for agencies to respond effectively and
quickly. It is essential for humanitarian supply chains to remain a priority to ensure that
agencies can assist affected communities with greater resilience and coordination, in times of
crisis.
Religion and Supply Chain
Each year, manufacturers are increasingly outsourcing their productions and operational
functions, which contributes to the globalization of goods and services. However, research has
also shown that supply chain management has typically overlooked socio-cultural dimensions,
particularly surrounding the influence of religious institutions and beliefs (Hewege & Perera,
2020). For instance, in the food industry some supply chains have failed to adhere to religious
certification standards. In Islam, followers must consume halal products, which must comply
with Shariah law. The guidelines indicate that animals must be hand-slaughtered by Muslims
while reciting a blessing, instead of slaughtered and processed by machines. This practice
extends beyond the food industry, and influences industries like banking, tourism, finance,
healthcare, and cosmetics (Hewege & Perera, 2020).
Outsourcing in the food industry is increasingly difficult to monitor compliance with halal
standards. Although there are over one-hundred and thirty halal certifying bodies worldwide,
research has shown that because of weak regulatory oversight and limited centralization, only
between five and seven percent of food labeled as “halal” truly meets the halal standards,
which highlights the gaps in accountability in the global supply chain (Hewege & Perera, 2020),
Supply chains function across multiple jurisdictions and governing agencies, therefore,
religion should be recognized as a form of governance, even without formal state authority. For
devout customers, cultural and religious values strongly shape purchasing behavior, which
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 10
directly impacts a company’s supply chain practices. Therefore, it is essential for supply chain
management to operate with the highest levels of accountability, ensuring that all religious,
cultural, and governmental regulations are upheld and equally respected.
Genesis Model (Creation-Fall-Redemption-Consummation Framework)
Often referred to as “The Good News Story,” or the “Creation-Fall-Redemption-
Consummation” framework, the Genesis Model offers a lens through which one can view and
interpret the meaning of life. This narrative illustrates the perfection of God’s original creation,
the fall of humanity through sins in the Garden of Eden, the redemption made through Jesus’
sacrifice on the Cross, and the final consummation, where God equips humanity with the tools
to restore the world according to His image.
Creation
Creation is described in Genesis 1-2, where God is revealed as the Creator of the
Heavans and the Earth. Genesis 1:27 states that “God created humankind in His image, in the
image of God, He created them” (Brettler et al., 2018. Later in Genesis 1:31, it affirms that “God
saw everything He made, and it was very good.” Our faith teaches us that God is sovereign,
eternal, and existed before all things. Scripture tells us that God not only created the world and
humanity in His image, but also gave people their purpose, to be fruitful, multiply, fill the Earth,
subdue it, and exercise stewardship over His creation.
Fall
The fall of humanity described in Genesis 3 occurs quickly after creation. In the
beginning there was harmony between God, man, and woman, however, this was interrupted
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 11
when the “Serpent” questioned Eve about God’s command not to eat from the tree of
knowledge.
Deceived by the Serpent’s words, Eve ate the fruit and shared it with Adam, both disobeying
God command. This act of disobedience brought sin into the world, resulting in God banishing
Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden, which was not part of His plan. However, God already
had formulated a plan for redemption. Paul explains in Romans 8:18-23, creation was subjected
to futility, however, one day it will be set from its bondage and share in the glory of the children
of God (Brettler et al., 2018).
Redemption
God demonstrates His power by transforming human sin, evil, and suffering into good.
Redemption was created though Jesus, who sacrificed His life on the cross to free humanity
from the bondage of sin and Satan’s grip on humanity. By living a sinless life, Jesus gave
humanity the gift of true freedom, however, redemption requires a verbal response, where
people must acknowledge their sins, repent for their sins, and accept Jesus as their Lord and
Savior. As reflected in Hebrews 5:7-10, we see Jesus offering prayers and supplications with
deep tears and cries, which underscores the depth of His sacrifice and intercession (Brettler et
al., 2018).
Consummation/Restoration
God’s plan has always been to restore and renew the world, and He works through His
followers and the Church to accomplish His purpose. Luke 11 reflects this mission, as He calls on
the Father: “Father, hallowed be thy name. Kingdom comes. Give us this day, our daily bread,
and forgive our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. Lead us not into
temptation” (Brettler et al., 2018). The fulfillment of God’s restoration will come upon His
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 12
return, where God will judge sin and evil, and establish His kingdom of peace and righteousness.
It is then that evil will be vanquished from this world. Matthew 24 states that Jesus speaks bout
the end of the age, reminding believers to remain faithful and wise. Specifically in Matthew
24:45-51, He warns those who are entrusted with responsibility over God’s household must live
diligently in anticipation of His return (Brettler et al., 2018).
Reflection and Connection to Our Work
Keller and Alsdorf (2012) illustrate that a worldview can be understood through three
key questions: How are things meant to be? What is the main problem with the way things are
now? What is the solution, and how can it be achieved? (pp. 158-159). When applying these
questions to the context of social justice and the Genesis model, one must realize that one
person cannot solve the issues alone, however, one can contribute to creating positive change,
though.
Reflecting on Keller and Alsdorf’s perspective, our culture plays a vital role in shaping
how we live, work, and define right from wrong. Culture not only influences our decisions, but it
also shapes them. When applied to the Genesis model, when our decisions and choices lead us
astray, we experience a fall, however, through repentance and faith, redemption is possible.
Furthermore, we must always remember that culture encompasses many aspects of life,
like religion; traditions; language; morals; and laws, along with a person’s individual traits like
humility, behavior, and self-awareness. It is beneficial for everyone to collaborate and keep open
lines of communication with one another. God calls on us to grow and transform our culture, as
stated in Romans 12:2: “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the
renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 13
acceptable and perfect” (Brettler et al., 2018). This transformation promotes God’s redemption
work in the world, advancing the process of restoration as described in the Genesis model.
Humans are responsible for improving themselves and serving the greater good, for this reflects
the love and redemption that we have received from God.
In both scripture and Keller and Alsdorf, it affirms that God designed humans to work.
Work as stated in the Bible, was present from the beginning of creation and was declared as
“very good.” Keller and Alsdorf suggest that God intended work to be an essential factor in
human life and redemption. All works hold value in the eyes of the Lord, regardless of the
nature of work because humans are created in His image with various and unique talents and
purpose.
Work can also be described as a way one can honor God through love and service to
others. Each interaction with coworkers, customers, and leaders reflects God’s love through the
work that I do. Keller and Alsdorf describe this as expressing love for God through service to
others, which shapes and improves our lives and culture. Humans are called to love and uplift
each other. Living as God had designed for us requires compassion, faith, and dedication, in
both our personal lives and in our professional lives, and through our love for God and each
other, we are promoting His continual work of renewal and restoration.
Economic Impacts on Supply Chain
Economics and supply chain management are deeply interconnected, each influencing
each other in significant ways. Shifts in the economy can initiate supply chain disruptions, which
can lead to issues like increase in prices, product shortages, and interruptions in manufacturing
and distribution operations. These factors can contribute to widespread global impacts on
economic performance and supply chain stability. Next, we will examine how the circular
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 14
economy, fluctuations in the stock market, economic recessions, and Covid-19, have affected
supply chain systems, globally.
Circular Economy
The Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2012) defines the circular economy as a system-based
framework that was created to address major global challenges, like pollution, climate change,
waste, and carbon emissions. The main purpose of the circular economy is to extend the
lifespan of products and services by keeping them in circulation for as long as possible through
various strategies like reusing, refurbishing, repairing, recycling, and sharing, which are all ways
to minimize waste and promote sustainable resource use.
In the forum of supply chain management, implementation of circular economy
principles has proven difficult in many industries, though (Bressanelli et al., 2018). Researchers
have identified seven main reasons for the issues on adopting these principles: financial
viability, market competition, product characteristics, regulatory standards, supply chain
structure, technology, and consumer behavior. For example, the car industry could face financial
challenges because manufacturers bear the upfront production costs while customers can pay
through installments (financing), which delays the break-even point and increases financial risk.
Similarly, the home appliance industry encounters issues with market competition because
durable products like washing machines have long life cycles, which decreases the need for
customers to purchase appliances every year and potentially cannibalize new product sales
(Bressanelli et al., 2018).
In the fashion industry, another obstacle would be the rapid shift in consumer
preferences and style trends, making it difficult to apply long-term reuse or recycling trends
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 15
(Winans et al., 2017). Furthermore, in the natural resource industries, like oil and carbon, there
are strict regulations that present additional difficulties. These industries typically prioritize
waste reductions and recycling instead of full circular reuse because of the environmental and
regulatory laws, and comparable challenges are also found in the energy production industry,
like power plants (Winans et al., 2017).
Technological challenges are also on the rise. While most companies are adopting
modern technologies to support recycling and sustainable product design, these new initiatives
typically come with a high upfront cost, which limits investment in the innovation of the new
product (Ueberschaar et al., 2017). This ties closely to broader financial barriers within the
circular economic framework. Furthermore, supply chain operations are becoming more
complex as they implement circular systems. Forecasting demand for renewable or reusable
materials remains uncertain, and the logistical efforts require collect, refurbish, and redistribute
end-of-life products increase transportation costs and environmental emissions, which is
counteracting the sustainability of the circular models (Ueberschaar et al., 2017; Winans et al.,
2017).
Therefore, the circular economy offers both opportunities and challenges for supply
chain management. While it can promote global sustainability, to be implemented correctly
requires continued research, innovation, and structural adaptation to ensure that supply chains
remain cost-effective, efficient, and environmentally responsible.
Covid-19 Pandemic
Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a devastating number of human lives loss and posed an
extraordinary challenge to the global economy and the supply chain systems, and the economic
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 16
and social disruptions that followed the pandemic were immense. Studies estimate that over
fifteen million additional people were pushed to extreme poverty, while approximately
sixhundred and ninety million people were reported as undernourished (Ahmed et al., 2020).
Furthermore, approximately 1.5 billion people, which represented about half of the global
workforce, were at risk of losing their jobs. All these realities placed strain on the global supply
chain network.
Closures of borders and global lockdowns severely restricted trade and movement,
which prevented many international workers from going to work and access to the markets. The
early shutdown of China’s industry triggered immediate and widespread disruptions globally
(Fassas et al., 2021). Fassas et al., (2021) and Ahmed et al., (2020) highlighted that the
pandemic exposed a significant lack of global preparedness, especially within the supply chain
management. As customer behaviors, trade patterns and production models changed,
companies were forced to reimagine how their companies would remain functional. The
pandemic was not like any other supply chain disruption because it increased to unprecedented
levels, which required continuous assessment, monitoring, and quick/rapid response.
Companies had to create tactical strategies to protect not only their employees and public
health, but also the integrity of supply operations. Strong data analytics and real-time
monitoring were essential tools for anticipating disruptions and coordinating timely responses
(Fassas et al., 2021).
Scholars Keenan (2020), Senna et al., (2021), and Singh and Parida (2021) have identified
six major challenges that emerged during the pandemic’s economic collapse. First, global supply
chains lacked resilience against large-scale, cross-border disruptions. Secondly, many global
companies were unable to manage rising operational costs as international trade declined.
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 17
Third, sustainability goals were undermined by the environmental impacts of supply chain
operations. Fourth, the heavy dependence on human labor instead of technological automation
left systems vulnerable to workforce shortages. Fifth, supply chains lack flexibility to meet the
changing demands of the customer, including product customization. Lastly, obsolete
information technology systems limit adaptability and increased costs during the rapidly
increasing and evolving crisis.
Despite these challenges, supply chain systems showed remarkable resilience. Although
the pandemic was one of the greatest global disruptions in modern history, supply chain
companies managed to mobilize quickly, analyze complex data, and implement strategic
solutions that ensured that goods and services continued to reach customers worldwide.
Recession on Supply Chain
Economic and supply chain systems are intricately connected, and both are deeply
affected by global disruptions. During the Great Recession of 2008–2010, industrialized nations
saw a 4.5% decline in GDP, while emerging economies fell by 8.8% (Nair et al., 2021; Mefford,
2011). Manufacturing and world trade were hit especially hard, dropping by over 40%. More
recently, the COVID-19 pandemic caused global economies to shrink an additional 3.3% to 4.9%
(Sodht & Tang, 2020). Studies have shown that macroeconomic downturns place significant
strain on manufacturing resources, marketing options, and production capacity (Nair et al.,
2021).
Traditionally, recessions lower demand and prices (Manhart et al., 2020), but the
pandemic created the opposite effect, supply shortages drove prices up despite falling demand
(Nair et al., 2021). This imbalance reduced profit margins across the supply chain, from raw
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 18
material processing to retail sales (Sodht & Tang, 2020). As revenues declined, companies
responded by cutting costs and reducing labor.
However, literature emphasizes that cost-cutting alone is insufficient. Firms that optimize
raw materials, energy use, and sustainability practices are better positioned to remain profitable
during economic downturns (Taqi et al., 2020). With energy prices at record highs, efficient
resource management is vital. Another ongoing challenge is labor shortage—industries continue
to struggle to attract and retain workers, leading to slower production and unmet demand (Pant
et al., 2020).
Overall, research confirms that economic instability directly influences supply chain
performance. While the 2008–2010 recession revealed vulnerabilities, the pandemic exposed
even broader and more complex global disruptions.
Financial Market Investments and Supply Chain
Financial markets, like supply chains, are driven by supply and demand. The value of
stocks and other securities is influenced by economic data, interest rates, and corporate
performance, all of which reflect broader market conditions and policy shifts that can ripple
through global supply chains (Shi et al., 2022).
Lisa Shalett, Chief Investment Officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, noted
that while the economy appears strong, emerging supply chain imbalances present growing
risks. Recent studies (Chen et al., 2021; Cho et al., 2020; Fu et al., 2021) have highlighted rising
home prices, increased margin debt, and changing regulations as key concerns. Housing
demand has surged while supply remains low, pushing prices up more than 12% annually. This
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 19
affordability crisis not only impacts consumers but also affects industries tied to homebuilding
and household goods (Fu et al., 2021).
Another issue is margin debt; the money investors borrow to trade securities. Margin
debt has risen by over 70% in the past two years, increasing market volatility and overall
financial risk (Chen et al., 2021). A sudden market downturn could trigger a chain reaction
across industries and supply chains worldwide (Cho et al., 2020).
Additionally, shifting federal policies and interest rate adjustments by the Federal
Reserve are expected to influence investment and inflation (Fu et al., 2021). Investors are
increasingly monitoring logistics-related stocks, such as UPS, CSX, Old Dominion Freight Line,
Trimble, and Manhattan Associates, and tracking port activity to predict supply chain trends
(Alldredge et al., 2022). Data from U.S. ports, including Los Angeles and Long Beach, show a
doubling in cargo turnaround time, from 3.6 to 6.4 days, indicating slower movement of goods.
Combined with weaker retail spending and rising inflation, these factors suggest the U.S.
economy may soon face declining momentum.
Conclusions and Future Research
This literature review aims to explore how cultural and economic factors influence
supply chain management. The studies examined reveal numerous constraints related to labor,
socioeconomic conditions, financial markets, and cultural diversity. However, what remains less
explored is how these elements are interconnected. Labor shortages, for instance, are closely
tied to many of the challenges discussed, while disruptions in raw materials and logistics directly
shape socioeconomic and cultural outcomes.
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 20
The research also highlights how cultural beliefs and behaviors can influence supply
chain integration decisions. Recognizing these dynamics allows leaders to better understand
how efficiency and productivity are linked to national culture and financial systems. Economic
instability often disrupts supply chains when global investment and policy decisions trigger
product shortages, price inflation, or labor and manufacturing gaps, ultimately harming
worldwide economic stability.
In summary, the reviewed studies identify and categorize the effects of cultural and
economic factors while suggesting mitigation strategies to manage or prevent supply chain
disruptions. Nonetheless, most analyses operate at a macro level, leaving micro-level and
interrelated cultural-economic connections underexplored. Future research should investigate
these relationships more deeply, considering how factors such as education and geographic
location further shape supply chain resilience and performance.
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 21
References
Ahmed, S.A.K.S, Ajisola, M., Azeem, K., Bakibinga, P., Chen, Y., & Choudhury, N. (2020).
Impact of the societal response to Covid-19 on access to healthcare for non-Covid-19
health issues in slum communities of Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria, and Pakistan: results
of pre-Covid and Coivd-19 lockdown stakeholder engagements. BMJ Global Health,
5(e003042), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003042
Alldredge, D.M., Chen, Y., Liu, S., & Luo, L. (2022). The effect of credit rating downgrades
along the supply chain. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 21(1), 1-31.
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-10-2020-0295
Bressanelli, G., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2018). Challenges in supply chain redesign for the
Circular Economy: a literature review and a multiple case study. International Journal of
Production Research, 57(23), 7395–7422.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1542176
Brettler, M., Newsom, C., & Perkins, P. (Eds.). (2018). The New Oxford annotated bible with
apocrypha (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Chen, H., Karim, K., & Tao, A. (2021). The effect of suppliers’ corporate social responsibility
concerns on customers’ stock price crash risk. Advances in Accounting¸52(3), 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2021.100516
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 22
Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. (2021). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and
conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 345-381.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00066-6
Cho, Y.J., Kim, Y., & Zang, Y. (2020). Information externalities and voluntary disclosure:
Evidence from a major customer’s earnings announcement. The Account Review, 95(6),
73-96. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0129
Durach, C.F., Glasen, P.C., & Straube, F. (2017). Disruption causes and disruption management
in supply chains with Chinese suppliers: Managing cultural differences. International
Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 2 October 2017; 47 (9): 843–
863. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2017-0228
Fassas, A., Bellos, S. and Kladakis, G. (2021), Corporate liquidity, supply chain, and cost issues
awareness within the Covid-19 context: evidence from us management reports’ textual
analysis, Corporate Governance, 21(6), 1155-1171. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2020-
0399
Fu, J., Wu, X., Liu, Y., Chen, R. (2021). Firm-specific investor sentiment and stock price crash
risk. Finance Research Letters, volume 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101442
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 23
Hewege, C. & Perera, C. (2020). The impact of religio-cultural institutional hegemony on Sri
Lankan (halal) supply chains: Theorizing the interplay between the certification body,
social institutions and the government. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(3), 351-
370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1813987
John, L., Gurumurthy, A., Soni, G., & Jain, V. (2019). Modelling the inter-relationship between
factors affecting coordination in a humanitarian supply chain: a case of Chennai flood
relief. Annuals of Operations Research, 283(1), 1227-158.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2963-3
Keenan, J.M. (2020). Covid, resilience, and the built environment. Environment Systems and
Decisions, 40(1), 216-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09773-0
Keller, T., & Alsdorf, K.L., (2012). Every Good Endeavor: Connecting Your Work to God’s
Work. Penguin Books.
Khan, M. N., Akhtar, P., & Merali, Y. (2018). Strategies and effective decision-making against
terrorism affecting supply chain risk management and security: A novel combination of
triangulated methods. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(7), 1528-1546.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0449
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 24
Manhart, P., Summers, J.K., Blackhurst, J. (2020). A meta-analytic review of supply chain risk
management: Assessing buffering and bridging strategies and firm performance. Journal
of Supply Chain Management, 56(3), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12219
Mefford, R. (2011). The economic value of a sustainable supply chain. Business and Society
Review, 116(1), 109-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2011.00379.x
Nair, A., Singh, P.J., Bhattacharya, A., & Pal, S. (2021). Withstanding the economic recession:
Examining the efficacy of manufacturing strategy alignment and process integration.
International Journal of Production Economics, 231(1), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107810
Nguyen, H., Onofrei, G., & Truong, D. (2021). Supply chain communication and cultural
compatibility: performance implications in the global manufacturing industry. Business
Process Management Journal, 27(1), 253-274. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-08-2019-
0314
Pant, P., Vishal, H., & Sarmah S.P. (2020). Does disruptive even affect supply base size:
Evidence from an emerging economy? Foreign Trade Review, 55(4), 496-510.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732520947903
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 25
Senna, P., Reis, A., Dias, A., Coelho, O., Guimarães, J., & Eliana, S. (2021). Healthcare supply
chain resilience framework: antecedents, mediators, consequents. Production Planning
and Control, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1913525
Shareef, M.A., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, Y.K., Kumar, V., Rana, N.P., & Islam, R. (2019). Social
media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources. Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services, 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.001
Shi, J., Liu, X., Li, Y., Yu, C., & Han, Y. (2022). Does supply chain network centrality affect
stock price crash risk? Evidence from Chinese listed manufacturing companies.
International Review of Financial Analysis, 80(1), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102040
Taqi, H.M.M., Humaira, N.A., Paul, S., Garshasbi, M., Syed, M. A., Kabir, G., & Paul, S. K.
(2020). Strategies to Manage the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Supply
Chain: Implications for Improving Economic and Social Sustainability. Sustainability,
12(22), 9483-9509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229483
Ueberschaar, M., Jalalpoor, D.D., Korf, N., & Rotter V.S. (2017). Potentials and barriers for
tantalum recovery from waste electric and electronic equipment. Journal of Industrial
CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING SUPPLY CHAIN 26
Ecology, 21(3), 700 714. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12577
Winans, K., Kednall, A., & Deng, H. (2017). The history and current applications of the circular
economy concept. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68(1), 825-833.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.123
Wong, C.W.Y., Sancha, C., & Thomsen, C.G. (2017). A national culture perspective in the
efficacy of supply chain integration practices. International Journal of Production
Economics, 193(1), 554 565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.015
Zegordi, S. & Davarzani, H. (2012). Developing a supply chain disruption analysis model:
Application of Colored Petrinets. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(2), 2102-2111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.137
