1 / 11100%
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 1
Multi-Case Case Study
Janet Millard
School of Business, Liberty University
BUSI830 Case Study Research Methods
Dr. Kenneth George
December 5, 2021
Author’s Note
I attest that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose. By submitting this assignment, I
attest this submission represents my own work, and not that of another student, scholar,
or internet source. I understand I am responsible for knowing and correctly utilizing
referencing and bibliographical guidelines. I have not submitted this work for any other
class. All communication regarding this paper should be addressed to Janet Millard.
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 2
Abstract
Case study research is an important method especially for the social science professions. The last
step in the case study process is reporting the case study. Reporting or composing the case study
must be done with flair and entice the audience to read the study. This process will differ
depending on the type of audience to which the research is being provided. From academics to
professionals and dissertation professors, the style and format must be geared toward their
specific needs. This paper will discuss the process of composing the research study.
Identification of the audience, visual and textual components of the study, striking a balance
when reporting the evidence, and will end with a sample case study.
Keywords: case study reporting, multi-case case study, case study reporting formats,
exemplary case study
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 3
Multi-Case Case Study
Introduction
Multi-case case study is a method of case study that can take two or more cases that
examine the same issue. Reporting these cases can take multiple formats. Prior to deciding on a
format for the study, identification of the audience must be determined during the design phase.
There are multiple formats that can be used to compose the case study. These formats vary
depending on the type of case study, solitary, or multi-case. Multi-case studies can be formatted
with all case studies documented individually or together. The individual cases should be cross-
case analyzed to compare the evidence. Composition of the case study research should reach for
exemplary. This will require a grasp on the amount of evidence to present and in what format.
The study must be complete and not ended due to lack of funding or time. Finally, the
composition must be interesting to the reader. It must be written in a manner that entices the
reader to continue.
Case Study Report Audience and Reporting Methodology
Composition of the case study report is dependent on the target audience (Yin, 2018).
The target audience must be identified at the start of the case study and can be complicated due
to a large number of potential types of audience. Potential audiences may include academics,
policy makers, faculty advisors for doctoral research projects, and sponsors of the research. The
type of audience(s) may require different reporting methodologies. Academics are interested in
relationships, findings, and previous research theory. Policy makers have an interest in the real-
world implications of the research. A DBA project committee will be extremely interested in the
depth of understanding of the research method and compliance with APA standards. The funders
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 4
are interested in a diversity of research which they may award funding. Novel ideals will be of
more interest to this audience.
Orienting the research to the needs of the audience will directly affect the form of the
report. There may be instances where it is necessary to compose the report and composition of
additional information for a particular audience (Yin, 2018). The information presented must be
sufficient to prove validity (construct, internal and external) and reliability of the data
(Ebneyamini & Sadeghi Moghadam, 2018). Meeting the needs of the audience will require
effective communication, upfront, with the target audience to gather their needs. Communication
is also the end goal of the report.
Visual and Textual Materials of a Case Study Report
The textual materials of a case study report can be presented in several different formats.
There are four types of case study compositional reports (Yin, 2018). The solitary case study
includes a single text to report and analyze the case study. This text may be augmented with
graphics, flow charts, and other visual aides to adequately represent the evidence. The single
case study may also contain some embedded evidence that must be reported. The embedded
evidence will be included in the presentation either within the main text or in an appendix. The
multi-case case study consists of multiple case studies that are presented individually in separate
sections or chapters. There is also a section that presents the cross-case results and analysis. An
alternative is a form where the multi-case analysis is the majority of the main text with the
individual case studies presented as appendices. The inclusion of a discussion regarding
triangulation of the data can also be included in this section. The data may be triangulated by
data source, investigator, theory, and/or methodology (Turnbull et al., 2021). A third form is a
question-and-answer presentation. The question and answers are the main portion of the text.
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 5
When used in a multi-case, each case study is presented individually, all with the same questions,
and then compared. The last format is for multiple case-studies only. In this format, only the
cross-study analysis is provided. There is no presentation of the individual cases. In multi-case
study research, the cases may examine separate issues within the same study (Young et al.,
2021). In Young et al., (2021), three separate ways of delivering information to patients were
reviewed to examine the efficacy and the data was compared in a cross-case analysis. The format
should be chosen during the design of the case study.
The visually the evidence or data can be displayed in one of many illustrative structures.
A linear-analytic structure is a standard approach that has a linear design with the issue or
problem being studied documented first and then continues with the literature review. Methods,
data collected, data analysis, findings, and conclusions complete the structure. A comparative
structure repeats the same material two or more times to compare alternative explanations. A
chronological structure is organized in chronological order. The sections or chapters of the study
may be organized in an early, middle, and late phases of the study. This structure is well suited to
an explanatory case study. Theory-building structures has sections or chapters that display
specific topics and theory. The structure is best for explanatory and exploratory case studies. The
theory building structure will examine the facets of a causal relationship in an explanatory case
and outline the value to further research in an exploratory case study. Suspense structure presents
the outcome and substantive information in the beginning of the case study and the rest of the
case study is presented and to build up to the conclusion and includes alternative explanations.
Unsequenced structures is presentation of the case study with no particular sequence. A
descriptive case study can be presented in an unsequenced structure.
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 6
Reporting Evidence: Striking the Balance
When reporting the case study, it is important to include all the necessary information but
also must not contain so much information to overwhelm the audience. An exemplary case study
must be significant to the furthering of the current literature. Significant cases are ones that are
unusual and of interest to a general audience, the issues are widely important and may affect
policy or be of practical significance. The case study must be complete. To determine
completeness, the researcher should first ensure that the boundaries have been fulfilled.
Secondly, there should be complete and show that evidence collection has been exhaustive. The
last sign of completeness is that the study concluded because it is complete and not because
funding is exhausted, or time ran out before completion.
Alternative perspectives must be considered. Rival propositions allow the researcher to
ensure that the assumptions of the case are accurate. Alternate views and theories, changes in
stakeholders or decision makers should be pursued. These alternative propositions may be
described in the main text or included in a separate or appendix. There must also be a display of
sufficient evidence to support the findings. The researcher must be diligent to ensure that enough
evidence and supporting documentation is present without overwhelming the audience with
arbitrary facts. The reader must feel confident that the evidence is adequate.
The case study must be presented in a manner that engages the reader. The researcher
must compose the case study report to entices the reader to continue. The writing should be clear
and concise while also vivid and vital. The writer’s enthusiasm should be clear to the reader.
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 7
Multiple-Case Case Study with Lean Six Sigma
Purpose
This multi-case integrated Lean Six Sigma case study research project is being conducted
to examine the various methods of establishing current workflow in each region of XYZ
Healthcare (XYZ). XYZ is a multinational corporation with one division dedicated to healthcare
technology. The portion of the organization is the Monitoring and Analytics which provides
cardiac monitoring solutions to healthcare organizations around the globe. This case study
research will be focused on the seven zones within the North American market.
Design
The issue being examined is the lack of continuity in delivery and education relating to
the purchased equipment and the documentation of services provided in the Sales Force
documentation program. The audience for this research is the Senior Manager of the Monitoring
and Analytic division and the North American Market C-Suite.
Method
A qualitative multi-case case study is performed to examine the disparities between
Philips NA seven zones during the education and implementation phases of delivery. The seven
zones clinical specialists will be sent a questionnaire and follow up interviews will be conducted
to further discuss their answers. Lean Six Sigma DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, implement,
and control) will be utilized as the primary tool for data collection and evaluation (Mustapha et
al., 2019).
In the define phase the customers will be defined along with their requirements and
expectations (Hall & Scott, 2016). A problem statement will be defined along with goals and
benefits. Each zone will be studied individually, and the data collected will be compared to
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 8
evaluate and determine the best practices. Data will be measured, analyzed and improvements
will be implemented. The results will be evaluated, and adjustments made as required (Al Owad
et al., 2018). This process will continue until the best practice is identified and the control phase
will be entered.
Findings
The findings will be displayed in textual form as well as using process maps, value
stream analyses, scatter charts, fishbone charts, graphs, and tables (Hall & Scott, 2016). The
findings will be displayed with a separate chapter for each zone. There will be an additional
chapter that will contain the cross-case analyses conducted on the seven cases in relation to each
other.
Practical Implications and Biblical Integration
A discussion of the implications of the findings of the study will be discussed including
the replication potential of the study, weaknesses of the study, and the need for further study.
Research has always been conducted in many different forms. Psalms 25:2 states that “It is the
glory of God to conceal a thing: But the honor of kings is to search out a matter (Zondervan,
2016). Academics and professionals can not take information at face value. Researching a topic
is essential to ensure that correct decisions are made and the resulting actions or policies are in
line with the current research. God knows all but man must continue to search out answers for
what they want and need to know.
Conclusion
The multi-case case study is a useful technique to examine and evaluate several
individual case studies of the same issue and utilizing the same tools. The first step in the case
study is to identify the target audience for which the case study is being conducted. This is done
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 9
in the design section of the study. The multi-case study can be formatted with each individual
case addressed separately and in their own chapters or they can be addressed together with cross-
case analyses. Performing the case study with a Lean Six Sigma integrated approach is achieved
using the DMAIC tool. All the information is collected using any of the Lean Six Sigma tools
such as process maps, flow charts and value stream analysis.
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 10
References
Al Owad, A., Samaranayake, P., Karim, A., & Ahsan, K. B. (2018). An integrated lean
methodology for improving patient flow in an emergency department-case study of a
Saudi Arabian hospital. Production, Planning & Control, 29(13), 1058–1081.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1511870
Ebneyamini, S., & Sadeghi Moghadam, M. (2018). Toward developing a framework for
conducting case study research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1),
160940691881795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918817954
Hall, J., & Scott, T. (2016). Lean six sigma: Beginner's guide to understanding and practicing
lean six sigma. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Mustapha, M., Abu Hasan, F., & Muda, M. (2019). Lean six sigma implementation: Multiple
case studies in a developing country. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(1),
523–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-08-2017-0096
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). The use of case study design in learning
management system research: A label of convenience? International Journal of
Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110041.
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211004148
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE
Publications, Inc.
Young, A. M., Hickman, I., Campbell, K., & Wilkinson, S. A. (2021). Implementation science
for dietitians: The ‘what, why and how’ using multiple case studies. Nutrition &
Dietetics, 78(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12677
MULTI-CASE CASE STUDY 12
References
Al Owad, A., Samaranayake, P., Karim, A., & Ahsan, K. B. (2018). An integrated lean
methodology for improving patient flow in an emergency department-case study of a
Saudi Arabian hospital. Production, Planning & Control, 29(13), 1058–1081.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1511870
Ebneyamini, S., & Sadeghi Moghadam, M. (2018). Toward developing a framework for
conducting case study research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1),
160940691881795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918817954
Hall, J., & Scott, T. (2016). Lean six sigma: Beginner's guide to understanding and practicing
lean six sigma. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Mustapha, M., Abu Hasan, F., & Muda, M. (2019). Lean six sigma implementation: Multiple
case studies in a developing country. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(1),
523–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-08-2017-0096
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). The use of case study design in learning
management system research: A label of convenience? International Journal of
Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110041.
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211004148
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE
Publications, Inc.
Young, A. M., Hickman, I., Campbell, K., & Wilkinson, S. A. (2021). Implementation science
for dietitians: The ‘what, why and how’ using multiple case studies. Nutrition &
Dietetics, 78(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12677
Zondervan. (2016). NIV Cultural Background Study Bible.
Students also viewed