Rational, Natural and Open Systems 2
Rational, Natural and Open Systems
This week discussion will be focused on rational, natural, and open systems. Each
category is how organizations can be classified. Rational, natural, and open systems perspective
is a guide to help individual understand and analyze the organization goals and behavior.
Understanding these different perspectives is very important because each plays a very important
part in the organizations. Rational, natural, and open systems perspective make value points
about an organization. Informal or formal structure within an organization, both system
organizational goal is to make sure that everyone understands the organization. The more
everyone understand the organization, the more likely they can work on their goals.
Defining Characteristics
A rational organizational system is a system that supports teamwork working together to
pursue goals. This type of organization focuses on the structure of the organization. The structure
of the organization is aligned with the company goals in mind. According to Li et al. (2018),
rational organizational systems focus on situational enticements and impediments. Therefore,
rational organizational systems have two main key components. The two main key components
of rational organizational systems are (1) formalization and (2) goal specificity. This type of
organizational structure focuses strictly on goals. The formal structure is the tool that helps align
the specific goals within an organization (Őnday, 2018). Therefore, within the rational
organizational theory, the organization focuses on setting or achieving goals. For the
organization to support their focus the organization needs to make sure that everyone is working
together to achieve their goals. A rational organization uses the formal structure to organize
every person's responsibility in the organization. According to Scott (2007), for the goals to be
relevant to the rational organization systems the goals need to be clearly defined, explicit, and
Rational, Natural and Open Systems 3
provide unambiguous data. Therefore, the goals of the organization need to be less vague as
possible. According to Scott (2007), specific goals supply relevant criteria to aid in choosing
activities and it also guides the organization's structure. Rational organizational systems can be
viewed as closed systems. The rational approach would be ideal for an organization that focuses
on seeking an understanding of its goals (Edwards, 2017). The organization that uses the rational
approaches has a clear understanding of each responsibility. A rational organizational system is a
group of individuals that work together as one for the goals of the organization. The rational
organization system relates to an organization as a mechanical model. Although the group works
individually, they also work together in meeting the goals of the organization. The main
characteristics of rational systems are formal structure, goal specification, efficiency and
effectiveness.
A natural organizational system focuses more on the interpersonal and informal structure
of an organization. Individuals within this organization have multiple tasks to complete. For
example, a natural organizational system can be viewed as a university or college. The professor
has more than one task to focus on. According to Scott (2007), a natural organizational system
recognizes the value of perpetuating the organization as a valuable resource. Natural
organizational systems influence the structure of an organization and guide the behavior of
individuals in staying on task with their goals. The natural system model helps the organization
balance the needs of all individuals. Therefore, this model can prevent any conflicts that might
occur within the organization. A natural organizational system focuses on the behavior of the
organization. As long as the communication is non-vague, an organization will exist. However,
for the individual to effectively communicate they must have the same goals in mind. From a
natural organizational system perspective, individual behaviors are most important. Although
Rational, Natural and Open Systems 4
every goal is equally important, the behavior of the organization is how the goals are being
achieved. The individual from a natural system theory has multiple goals they focus on. Instead
of being focused on just one task of the organization, the individual from a natural system theory
has no problem multitasking. The main characteristics of natural systems are informal structure,
goal complexity and functional analysis.
Open organizational systems focus on both goal specificity and behavior within an
organization. The resources from the environment include energy, material, and information that
are valuable to the organization. It is especially important to know that from an open
organizational systems perspective that “connections with “external” elements can be more
critical than those among “internal” components,” (Scott, 2007). Monitoring the environmental
resources can help the environment survive within the organization. The characteristics of self-
maintenance within an open system have a strategy of adjusting to the environment in the
organization. According to Scott (2007), Open organizational systems perspective environment
shapes support and infiltrates organizations. Open organizational systems perspective is an open
networked structure that rely heavily on external environments, that can lead to enhanced
performance in the organization (Jung and Vakharia, 2019). The organization is accepting of
adapting to changes to survive in the open systems view. Everyone must motivate, support, and
encourage each other in the open systems view. According to Vlados (2019), open organizational
systems do not have a structure for leadership. The open system’s organizational systems view is
aligned with the development of studies focused on understanding organization populations, sets,
and fields (Scott, 2007). An open system outlines the relationships between settings and
organizations. Within an open organizational system, the views are flexible because of the
connection between the organization and the environment. The open system organizational
Rational, Natural and Open Systems 5
supplies recommendation on how the organization can use the policy to create a more formal
structure (Anderson‐Long Jeffries, 2019). The main characteristics of open systems are multiple
subsystems, normative structure, and self-maintenance.
Relationship Between the Three
Rational, natural, and open organizational systems all relate to each other in one way or
another. Rational and natural organizational systems both are closed systems. Rational, natural,
and open organizational systems have goals to obtain. Rational organizational systems are the
first method that introduces the different viewpoints of an organization. The natural
organizational system was constructed from rational organizational systems. The natural
organizational system is a more direct method of rational organizational method. Whereas open
organizational systems are a combination of both rational and natural organizational systems.
Open organizational systems cannot just focus on one of the other methods, instead, they must
focus on both rational and natural organizational systems. Rational, natural, and open system
organizational are all methods that work within the organization to make sure the goals are being
achieved. For all the methods to work, effective communication must be followed. Each
perspective serves a purpose in motivating the individual to work towards achieving their goals
within the organization. According to Vranceanu et al. (2020) individuals that are focused on
their goals usually are successfully within their organization. Therefore, it is more likely that if
the individual is interested in their goals, they are more likely to achieve those goals within the
organization. These three-perspective relations all tie together to help organize how the
individual work on the company’s goals. Rational, natural, and open organizational systems all
have a purpose for the organizations. Each different method of each perspective still works to
help the individual achieve their goal within the organization.
Rational, Natural and Open Systems 6
Theoretical Viewpoints
Rational system organizational theoretical viewpoints imply that everyone depends on
rational calculation. As a result of this rational calculation, the individual interest is aligned with
rational choices. Within this system organizational theoretical viewpoints, the perspectives serve
as a tool to help set and define individual goals. Every goal is clearly defined for everyone within
the organization. According to Scott (2007), rational system organizational theoretical
viewpoints focus more on the highly structured end. This system's organizational theoretical
viewpoints are based on human nature. The rational system organizational theoretical viewpoint
focuses on helping the individual understand how important it is when they work together. The
rational system organizational theoretical viewpoint ensures that every individual within the
organization is following the formal structures for the organization to work as a group in
conducting their goals. Natural system organizational theoretical viewpoints focus more on the
less structured end (Scott, 2007). Just like the rational system of organizational theoretical
viewpoints, this system also is based on human nature. Natural organizational system theoretical
viewpoint focuses on the behavior of an individual rather than the structure. The natural system
organizational theoretical viewpoint center around the idea that interpersonal and informal is
more important than the formal structure. Open system organizational theoretical viewpoints
focus on the involvement between the organization and the environment. The Open system
organizational theoretical viewpoint align with the environment and organization working
together to the extent that the organizational-environment boundary is indistinct (Scott, 2007).
Each perspective has its very own theoretical viewpoints, and how they contribute to the
business structured. Different theoretical viewpoints supply different perspectives. However,
each different system organization's theoretical viewpoint focuses on understanding the
Rational, Natural and Open Systems 7
organization. According to Scott (2007) each system's organizational theoretical viewpoint's
main goal is to make sure that the individual understands the organization's structure,
performance, and survival.
Personal Perspectives
From a personal perspective rational, natural, and open systems all need to be in place to
understand the organization's goals. In regard to the rational system organizational from a
personal perspective, there is limited room for individual goals, rather than the individual being
more focused on how the team works together as one instead of individually. The organizations
fully rely on the formal structure of the organization to carry out their goals. Concerning the
natural system organization from a personal perspective, the individual is focused on their
individual goals. Instead of working as a team, the individual is more than likely to work alone
on their goals with an informal structure. From a personal perspective, open systems rely heavily
on the environment to aid in providing the organization with resources to help them carry out
their goals. Both rational and natural approaches are used in this theory. From a personal
perspective rational, natural, and open systems supply useful theatrical viewpoints to help
everyone understand the organization's wants and needs. Not knowing the needs and wants of the
organizations can cause the organization's goals not to be met. Regardless of which theoretical
analysis an individual decided to use, their goals are still the same for all, which is to make sure
the organization's goal is known.
Biblical Principle
Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that
by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect
Rational, Natural and Open Systems 8
(English Standard Version, 1978/1983, Romans 12:2). As followers of Jesus, we must walk by
his word. Although we are born in a sinful world, we must always overcome sinful ways. To
walk in Jesus' teaching, there must be a renewal of the mind. The mind must be strong enough to
overcome temptation. It is so easy for everyone to have a personal view of someone else life, yet
we fail to realize that not one person on this earth is perfect. Since we are not perfect, we are
tempted to fall short of following his word. With a strong mind, anyone can overcome the
temptation of the world. The mind can be renewed by feeding it with positive thoughts. By
renewal, of the mind, the spiritual will be renewed as well. Reading the bible and going to church
will help support the renewal of the mind. The mind is a very important part of the body. The
mind helps structure the spirit. A peaceful mind brings a peaceful spirit. Therefore, it is better to
be a peace within. Having a peaceful mind, help direct your thoughts to a positive peacefully
sinless life.
Conclusion
This week discussion board focuses on rational, natural and open systems characteristics,
relationship between the three, theoretical viewpoints and personal perspectives. In the rational
system organizational much focus is on the formal structure of the organization. The individual
working as a team to obtain the organization's goals is very important within this system
organization. The belief that individuals can join together as one to work on the same goal is how
the company remains focused on their organization's needs and wants. These individuals are
committed to helping the organization achieve its goals by working together. In the natural
system organizational much focus is on the informal structure of the organization. The individual
is focused on individual goals rather than the goals of a team. Finally, the open system
Rational, Natural and Open Systems 9
organizational is not restricted to formal or informal but is a more open structure that works with
the environment influence. Rational, natural, and open systems all have a purpose for the
organization, and that purpose is to make sure everyone understands the needs and wants of the
organization.
References
Anderson‐Long, M., & Jeffries, M. (2019). Open systems theory analysis of community college
Gender‐Inclusive housing policies.New Directions for Community Colleges,2019(188),
67-78.Ihttps://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20379
Edwards Jr, D. B. (2017). Policy formation in the context of global governance: Rational,
organizational, and political perspectives on policymaking in El Salvador. International
Journal of Educational Development, 52, 81-96.
Jung, Y., & Vakharia, N. (2019). Open systems theory for arts and cultural organizations:
Linking structure and performance.The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and
Society,49(4), 257-273.Ihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2019.1617813
Li, H., Luo, X. , Zhang, J., & Sarathy, R. (2018). Self-control, organizational context, and
rational choice in internet abuses at work.Information & Management,55(3), 358-
367.Ihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.09.002
Őnday, Ő. (2018). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONCEPTS OF RATIONAL,
NATURAL AND OPEN SYSTEMS: MANAGING ORGANIZATIONS TODAY.
International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 10(1), 245-258.
Rational, Natural and Open Systems 10
Scott, W. R. (2007).IOrganizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems
Perspectives.London, England: Prentice Hall, Inc. ISBN: 9780131958937
Vlados, C. (2019). Change Management and Innovation in the 'Living Organization': The Stra.
Tech. Man Approach. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7(2), 229-
256.
Vranceanu, A., Reichman, M., Mace, R. A., Mohamadi, A., & Chen, N. (2020). Does a patient's
approach to achieving goals influence his or her recovery trajectory after musculoskeletal
illness?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,478(9), 2067-
2076.Ihttps://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001374