lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three: Ethics
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 7, 2020
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three: Ethics
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
The discussion board prompt presents the following statement for consideration, “A
company should produce and sell any product as long as there is a market for it.” I disagree with
this statement as it does not allow for the acknowledgement of business and marketing ethics.
These concepts are more relevant in modern business as corporate social responsibility and
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
consumer trust have risen as key indicators of success when marketing items or services a
corporation produces and sells (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009).
There is an argument that can be made that there is a market (demand) for anything,
regardless of decency, moral obligation or responsibility, or personal religious belief. This fact is
reflected in the underground, or black market space for drugs, human trafficking, and
pornography. However, as covered in last week’s discussion post, the practice of business
requires Christians to ensure their work connects to something larger; as “business shapes the
world we live in” (Van Duzer, 2010). When business decisions and policies are derived from a
faith-based perspective, it should be a requirement that the opportunities produced in business
reflect God’s will and given talents to create meaningful and creative work (Van Duzer, 2010).
This ties into the research by Castaldo et al. (2009) as “consumers are interested in the
social behavior of firms” and one way a business represents their goodness is by the products,
and quality of products, they produce (p. 1). Failure to meet the litmus test of social
responsibility and goodness may result in consequences for a firm in the form of cancellation or
boycotts (Castaldo et al. 2009). While the idea of cancel culture may seem frivolous to some, it
can be an expensive ramification (loss of sales or poor optics on social media) for being out of
step with consumer’s expectations. A recent example of this can be seen when an Amazon third
party seller created and sold t-shirts denigrating a political candidate on assumptions of
promiscuity. Political parties aside, the overall public response showed low acceptability to the
sexual harassment of a female candidate and pressured Amazon to have the item removed; and it
was (Rivera, 2020).
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://search-
proquestcom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198221686?pq-origsite=summon
Rivera, J. (2020). Amazon removes clothing with derogatory term toward kamala harris. USA
Today. Retrieved from
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/18/amazonselling-clothing-derogatory-
term-toward-kamala-harris/3395758001/
Van Duzer, J. (2010). “Why Business Matters to God”. IVP Academic. Retrieved from
https://www.theologyofwork.org/resources/why-business-matters-to-god-jeff-van-duzer
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Three Response: Ethics
Hello Marcus,
Thank you for your discussion board post on business ethics and corporate social
responsibility. Your post provides a good perspective on the assumption that may be encountered
by all business owners and corporations. The conflict lies between the choice of the ideology of
free-market trade theory, and the practice of doing no harm. In addition, free-market trade is
often bolstered by laws that govern the legal sale of potentially harmful products, such as the
examples you provided of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. I agree with your assertions, that
corporations should be socially responsible in both their purpose and practice; especially when it
comes to their chosen products and services. Scripture shares, “Do not conform to the pattern of
this world but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and
approve what God’s will is- his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, New
International Version). As Christians in the board room, God’s grace commands us to pursue
creative and innovative business. As such, we must look beyond the aspects of a desire-based
business and instil Christ in all that we do. Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, and Tencati (2009)
conducted research on the interaction of consumer trust and corporate social responsibility. The
researchers found that authentic corporate strategies that provide care and acknowledgment for
the community and relevant stakeholders have the ability to maximize benefits to shareholders in
the long run.
References
Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate
social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of
