ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 1
Integrated Learning Project: Part 6 – Tesla
Capacity Requirements Planning
Melissa Ruk
School of Business, Liberty University
BUSI615: Logistics
Professor Jonathan Wilson
December 3, 2023
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 2
Capacity Requirements Planning
Capacity Requirements Planning (CRP) is a system organizations use to assess and
manage their production capacity in alignment with production goals and changing demands
(Permana et al., 2021). CRP utilizes techniques like technological sequencing of material flow to
build production schedules. Additionally, according to Permana et al., the primary aim is to
ensure that a company's production capacity meets the requirements for achieving production
targets. CRP involves systematically analyzing the resources, facilities, and capabilities required
to fulfill production needs efficiently (El Maraghy & Deif, 2019). An important aspect of CRP is
its integration with Materials Requirements Planning (MRP), where it acts as a vital link between
fabrication and production planning (Miller & Sprague, 2014). CRP encompasses finite capacity
planning and scheduling, generating production plans based on the sequence of operations to
fulfill dynamic market demands (Kandiraju et al., 2016). CRP systems not only optimize
resource utilization but also aid in identifying and mitigating potential bottlenecks, enhancing
overall operational efficiency (Miller & Sprague, 2014 ). CRP empowers organizations to make
informed decisions by providing insights into the sufficiency of their production capabilities,
allowing for agile adaptations to changing market conditions (El Maraghy & Deif, 2019). CRP is
a cornerstone for manufacturing enterprises striving for effective production management and
responsiveness to market dynamics.
Organizations choose to invest in CRP systems because they have numerous benefits.
Optimized resource utilization is a key advantage of CRP systems. CRP systems are pivotal in
aligning production capacity with demand, ensuring that resources such as manpower,
equipment, and facilities are utilized efficiently. These systems enable organizations to optimize
their resources by aligning production capacity with demand, preventing overutilization or
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 3
underutilization of resources (Raman & Rakesh, 2022). This optimization is crucial for
companies like Tesla because they can optimize their resources and use manpower, equipment,
and facilities more efficiently, contributing to cost-effectiveness and improved productivity. A
second benefit companies like Tesla can experience when implementing CRP systems is more
responsive production planning. CRP facilitates responsive production planning because
organizations can better anticipate and plan for changing demands (Raman & Rakesh, 2022).
This agility allows organizations to adjust their production processes according to market
dynamics, reducing the risk of stockouts or excess inventory. A third benefit companies like
Tesla can experience when implementing CRP systems is enhanced service delivery. When
Tesla implements a CRP system, this contributes to streamlined production processes, ensuring
that the demand for electric vehicles is met efficiently, leading to improved customer satisfaction
and service delivery (Raman & Rakesh, 2022). In addition, a CRP system allows for more
accurate matching between manufacturing and demand forecasting, enabling Tesla to meet
customer orders promptly, reducing lead times, and ensuring timely deliveries. Additionally, by
optimizing production capacity, Tesla can allocate resources effectively, preventing bottlenecks
and enhancing the overall customer experience. A fourth and final benefit companies like Tesla
can experience when implementing CRP systems is improved budgeting and financial planning.
When using a CRP system, Tesla can have an improved financial insight because the system
provides a comprehensive view of production costs, allowing for more accurate budgeting and
resource allocation (Miller & Sprague, 2014). CRP systems also aid in budgeting by providing
insights into the resources needed to meet current demand. This information is invaluable for
Tesla's financial planning as it can now allocate resources effectively.
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 4
Implementation of the CRP
Implementing a CRP system at a company like Tesla involves a strategic and
collaborative process to ensure efficient resource allocation and production planning. Steps that
need to be taken to ensure proper implementation of a CRP system are analysis of current
processes, advanced technologies, and employee training and involvement.
First and foremost, the implementation process should start with a thorough analysis of
current processes. This initial step involves meticulously examining Tesla's existing
manufacturing workflows and operational dynamics. This assessment provides a baseline
understanding of the company's current capacity utilization and production bottlenecks (Poulton,
2022). By identifying these constraints, Tesla can strategically allocate resources where they are
most needed, ensuring optimal efficiency and preventing possible disruptions. Secondly, a
thorough analysis of current processes allows Tesla to identify areas that could benefit from
automation and technology integration (Poulton, 2022). According to Poulton, this could mean
implementing advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms to predict future demand
fluctuations, allowing for more proactive planning and resource allocation. The assessment phase
also gives Tesla valuable insights into the historical demand patterns. This allows Tesla to
evaluate the data to ensure its correctness, enabling more accurate data-driven decision-making
of the CRP.
The utilization of advanced technologies also plays a critical role in enhancing the
implementation process of a CRP system at Tesla. Incorporating predictive analytics and
artificial intelligence (AI) into the CRP system enables Tesla to forecast production demands
accurately (Sanguesa et al., 2021). In addition, machine learning algorithms can analyze
historical data, market trends, and external factors, providing real-time insights for proactive
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 5
capacity planning and resource allocation (Sanguesa et al., 2021). Tesla has also created an
interconnected ecosystem facilitated by the Internet of Things (IoT), allowing seamless
communication between manufacturing locations and departments. Real-time data from
machines, vehicles, and sensors can be integrated into the CRP system, enabling a dynamic and
responsive production environment (Lobo, 2020).
Employee training and involvement play a crucial role in successfully implementing the
CRP. Training programs can educate employees on the workings of the CRP system and ensure a
comprehensive understanding of the system functions and how to properly use the system (Furr
& Dyer, 2023). When Tesla properly trains its staff on the new system, the knowledge given to
each employee empowers them to make informed decisions regarding capacity planning,
contributing to the overall efficiency of the manufacturing process. Involving employees in the
implementation process also fosters a sense of ownership and commitment. Employees who feel
engaged are more likely to participate actively in data collection, contribute valuable insights,
and adhere to best practices within the CRP system, enhancing the accuracy of information and
decision-making (Miller & Sprague, 2014). Moreover, employee involvement can lead to a
smoother integration of the CRP system into daily operations, reducing resistance to change.
Ongoing training programs also enable Tesla's employees to adapt to technological
advancements and updates in the CRP system, ensuring they remain proficient in its usage.
Operation of the CRP
Capacity Requirements Planning (CRP) systems ensure efficient resource utilization and
operational excellence. Several key steps must be taken to operate a CRP system within an
organization successfully. First, it is essential to establish and understand the organization's
capacity needs. This involves analyzing historical data, current production levels, and future
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 6
growth projections. This initial assessment forms the basis for creating accurate and actionable
capacity plans (Poulton, 2022). Organizations must also select and implement a suitable CRP
software solution. This entails evaluating different systems based on factors such as scalability,
integration capabilities with existing systems, and user-friendliness. An effective CRP system
should be able to generate real-time insights, allowing organizations to make informed decisions
regarding capacity adjustments (Miller & Sprague, 2014). Integration with Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) systems is crucial for seamless operations. An ERP system provides a
centralized platform for various business processes, and integrating CRP with ERP ensures a
unified approach to capacity planning. This integration allows data synchronization across
different departments, leading to a more holistic understanding of organizational capacity needs
(Poulton, 2022).
Responsibility for operating a CRP system typically falls to various departments and
teams across the organization. One key responsibility lies with the operations or production
management team. Various individuals oversee day-to-day activities, monitor production levels,
and ensure that the CRP system is aligned with production goals (Sohal et al., 2001). The supply
chain and procurement teams are integral to CRP system operation. These teams are responsible
for communicating with suppliers, managing inventory levels, and responding to changes in
demand. By actively participating in the CRP process, supply chain and procurement
professionals contribute to the accuracy of capacity forecasts and the overall efficiency of
operations (Sohal et al., 2001). The IT department also plays an important role in the operation
of the CRP system. IT professionals are responsible for aiding with the system implementation,
maintenance, and troubleshooting. They must ensure the CRP system is secure, up-to-date, and
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 7
capable of handling the organization's evolving needs (Tseng et al., 2011). The IT department
collaborates with software vendors to address technical issues and implement updates.
Sources of Inaccuracies in the CRP
CRP systems play a pivotal role in optimizing production processes. However, despite
their effectiveness, several factors can contribute to inaccuracies in the data contained within
these systems. Understanding and addressing these potential sources of inaccuracy are crucial for
maintaining the reliability of CRP system outputs. Sources of inaccuracy include poor data
quality, uncertain demand forecasting, supply chain disruptions, Technological advancements,
and human error.
Poor data quality is one of the primary sources of inaccurate data in a CRP system. Data
collection, entry, or storage inaccuracies can lead to flawed CRP outputs, impacting the overall
supply chain plan (Xu et al., 2002). Generally, a CRP system is only as good as the data entered.
If flawed or inaccurate data is entered, the generated information will generate an inaccurate or
skewed image of what is happening in the company. Because decision-makers at Tesla rely on
the information generated to make decisions, if the data generated is poor, Tesla runs the risk of
making poor or costly decisions from inaccurate data. Incorporated into poor data quality is
when users enter uncertain demand forecasting. Unforeseen changes in market conditions,
consumer preferences, or economic downturns can lead to deviations from predicted production
requirements, introducing inaccuracies into the CRP system (Katsaliaki et al., 2021). Accurate
CRP depends on precise demand forecasting. Katsaliaki et al. also noted that CRP systems
relying on historical data may struggle to adapt to sudden changes, resulting in inaccurate
demand projections. If Tesla fails to predict demand accurately or uses inaccurate historical data,
a CRP system can misallocate resources, causing overcapacity or undercapacity issues.
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 8
Another issue that can cause sources of inaccuracies is supply chain disruptions.
Disruptions in the supply chain can significantly affect the availability of raw materials.
Disruption can be natural disasters, geopolitical events, or unexpected logistical challenges
(Katsaliaki et al., 2021). The unpredictability of supply chain disruptions can significantly
impact production lines because they can generate raw material shortages. CRP systems rely on
accurate inventory data to plan production schedules efficiently and allocate resources. CRP
systems rely on accurate inventory and material availability data; because of this, the system can
struggle to adjust schedules when faced with unexpected shortages, leading to production delays
(Saleheen & Habib, 2022). As the world learned through the COVID-19 pandemic, unplanned
supply chain disruption can significantly negatively impact any company's production
capabilities. Unplanned disruptions, such as machinery breakdowns or workforce shortages
resulting from unforeseen events, contribute to unplanned downtime. CRP systems, designed for
continuous and efficient production, face challenges when disruptions disrupt the regular
operation of manufacturing processes (Alkahtani et al., 2021). Tesla needs to constantly monitor
the possibilities for supply chain disruption and modify the data entered in the CRP to ensure the
system can function efficiently and adjust to any inventory shortages while keeping up with
consumer demand.
Technological advancements can be an additional source of inaccuracies. Technological
advancements, while enhancing efficiency, can introduce complexities and integration
challenges in CRP systems. Upgrades, migrations, or the implementation of new technologies
may lead to data migration errors or inconsistencies in the interpretation of data formats (Renu,
2021). Additionally, integrating emerging technologies for risk management, as observed in the
manufacturing sector, poses the risk of unanticipated disruptions, influencing the accuracy of
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 9
production-related data in CRP systems (Rodríguez-Espíndola et al., 2022). Tesla heavily relies
on automation in its production processes. While automation enhances efficiency, it also
introduces risks. Changes in automation systems or the introduction of new technologies may
lead to discrepancies in data collection and interpretation, affecting the accuracy of CRP data
(McKinsey & Company, 2019).
Human error is a final area that can generate inaccuracies for a CRP system. Despite
advancements in automation, human error remains a potential source of inaccuracy. One
common source of human error is data entry mistakes. Employees recording production data or
updating the CRP system may inadvertently input incorrect values, leading to inaccuracies in
resource allocation and production planning (Strauch, 2021). Strauch also stressed that
inadequate training on using CRP systems can contribute to human error. If employees are not
well-versed in the system's functionalities, they may struggle with accurate data input, potentially
leading to discrepancies in the CRP data. Incorrect data entry, miscalculations, or
misinterpretations of data can occur at various stages of the CRP system implementation. Tesla
must provide ongoing training and implement robust data validation processes to minimize the
impact of human error (Strauch, 2021).
Comparison of Two CRP
There are many CRP systems for Tesla to shop and compare. It is best for Tesla and other
organizations to closely examine the features of various systems and compare capabilities, cost,
implementation process, and technology required before deciding on what CRP system will work
best for them. It is also essential to understand the system's shortcomings to understand if those
are significant enough to hinder production. Two systems that will be looked at are Oracle
Advanced Supply Chain Planning and SAP Production Planning.
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 10
Oracle Advanced Supply Chain Planning (ASCP) is a comprehensive, Internet-based
planning solution designed to optimize supply chain operations. It plays a pivotal role in
decision-making regarding the timing and location of supplies, including inventory, purchase
orders, and work orders (Oracle, 2023). According to Oracle, the system can also leverage cost-
based optimization by selecting shipping methods based on associated costs, contributing to
efficient logistics management. As part of Oracle's broader Supply Chain Planning solutions,
ASCP focuses on agile planning and supply chain optimization to enhance customer service and
profitability. ASCP stands out for its Internet-based approach, allowing users to remotely access
and utilize the planning functionalities. It excels in providing decision-makers with insights into
when and where supplies should be positioned to meet demand effectively. With features like
supply chain plan modeling, holistic optimization, and simultaneous planning across facilities,
ASCP addresses the complexities of modern supply chain management, contributing to improved
efficiency, reduced costs, and enhanced competitiveness in the market (Oracle, 2023). The
specific cost details for Oracle ASCP can vary based on factors like the scale of implementation,
customization requirements, and support services. As Oracle noted, the system's benefits include
streamlined and simultaneous planning across all supply chain facilities, generating detailed
plans covering material and distribution requirements, and user-friendly flows. As has been the
case with other Oracle systems, the cost can be significant, particularly for extensive
implementations and advanced features that might introduce complexity, requiring training for
effective utilization.
SAP Production Planning (SAP PP) is a SAP ERP system module designed to streamline
and optimize manufacturing processes. Its primary functions include tracking and recording the
entire manufacturing process, from planning to execution, ensuring efficient production
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 11
operations (O'Donnell, 2017). According to the software developers, SAP PP enables businesses
to plan, schedule, and monitor production activities, integrating with other SAP modules like
Materials Management and Sales and Distribution for comprehensive supply chain coordination.
One of SAP PP's key features is its ability to convert planned orders into production orders,
facilitating seamless workflow management (SAP, 2023). Additionally, the software supports the
release of production orders and manages goods issuance for production orders, ensuring
accurate tracking and inventory control throughout the production lifecycle. SAP PP
implementation costs vary based on business size, customization needs, and support
requirements. Just like other systems, SAP PP does come with some drawbacks such as SAP PP
implementation can be complex, requiring skilled professionals for setup and maintenance, the
initial investment in SAP PP can be high, impacting smaller businesses disproportionately, and
there can be an extremely high learned curve for new users.
Oracle Advanced Supply Chain Planning and SAP Production Planning can be vital in any
organization that implements one by aligning production with market demand and available
production capacity, contributing to efficient resource utilization and cost-effective production
processes. After analyzing the features, Tesla could benefit from implementing either system to
ensure they align with the company's needs. However, Oracle's ASCP could be the better option
as it is an internet-based software that could connect Tesla's various locations more easily.
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 12
References
Alkahtani, M., Omair, M., Khalid, Q. S., Hussain, G., Ahmad, I., & Pruncu, C. (2021). A covid-
19 supply chain management strategy based on variable production under uncertain
environment conditions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health, 18(4), 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041662
El Maraghy, H. A., & Deif, A. M. (2019). Capacity planning.JCIRP Encyclopedia of Production
Engineering, 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53120-4_6388
Furr, N., & Dyer, J. (2023a, March). Lessons from Tesla’s approach to Innovation. Harvard
Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/02/lessons-from-teslas-approach-to-innovation
Kandiraju, A., Garcia-Herreros, P., Misra, P., Arslan, E., Mehta, S., & Grossmann, I. E. (2016).
Capacity planning with rational markets and demand uncertainty.JComputer Aided
Chemical Engineering, 2169–2174. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63428-3.50366-0
Katsaliaki, K., Galetsi, P., & Kumar, S. (2021). Supply chain disruptions and resilience: A major
review and future research agenda. Annals of Operations Research, 319(1), 965–1002.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03912-1
Kessler, M., & Arlinghaus, J. C. (2022). Managing Supply Chain Disruption by collaborative
resource sharing. Supply Network Dynamics and Control, 79–93.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09179-7_4
Lobo, A. (2020a). A case study on Tesla: The world’s most exciting automobile company.
Medium. https://medium.com/@ashleylobo98/a-case-study-on-tesla-the-worlds-most-
exciting-automobile-company-535fe9dafd30
McKinsey & Company. (2019). Driving impact at scale from automation and AI.
https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/mckinsey
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 13
%20digital/our%20insights/the%20economic%20potential%20of%20generative%20ai
%20the%20next%20productivity%20frontier/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-
next-productivity-frontier-vf.pdf
Miller, J. G., & Sprague, L. G. (2014, August 1).JBehind the growth in Materials Requirements
Planning. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1975/09/behind-the-growth-in-
materials-requirements-planning
O’Donnell, J. (2017). What is SAP production planning?: Definition from TechTarget.
SearchSAP. https://www.techtarget.com/searchsap/definition/SAP-Production-Planning
Oracle. (2023). Oracle® Advanced Supply Chain Planning Implementation and user’s guide.
Oracle Advanced Supply Chain Planning Implementation and User’s Guide.
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18727_01/doc.121/e13358/T309464T309467.htm
Permana, S., Andriani, M., & Dewiyana, D. (2021). Production Capacity Requirements Planning
Using The Capacity Method Requirement Planning.JInternational Journal of
Engineering, Science and Information Technology,J1(2), 36–40.
https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v1i1.149
Poulton, K. (2022). Capacity Requirements Planning and its use in manufacturing. QAD Blog.
https://www.qad.com/blog/2022/03/capacity-requirements-planning-and-its-use-in-
manufacturing
Raman, Dr. P., & Rakesh, Dr. N. (2022). AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON CAPACITY
REQUIREMENT PLANNING (CRP) IN ERW SECTION AT AN AUTOMOTIVE
SECTOR, CHENNAI.JInternational Journal of Novel Research and Development
(IJNRD),J7(5). http://www.ijnrd.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJNRDA001108
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 14
Renu, N. (2021). Technological advancement in the era of covid-19. SAGE Open Medicine, 9,
205031212110009. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211000912
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022).
Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital
manufacturing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121562.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562
Sanguesa, J. A., Torres-Sanz, V., Garrido, P., Martinez, F. J., & Marquez-Barja, J. M. (2021). A
review on electric vehicles: Technologies and challenges. Smart Cities, 4(1), 372–404.
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010022
Saleheen, F., & Habib, M. M. (2022). Global Supply Chain Disruption Management Post covid
19. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12(03), 376–389.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.123021
SAP. (2023). SAP Advanced Planning and Optimization.
https://help.sap.com/docs/SAP_ADVANCED_PLANNING_AND_OPTIMIZATION,_ON
_SAP_ERP/c95f1f0dcd9549628efa8d7d653da63e/
4d113d2c2b4f0231e10000000a42189b.html
Sohal, A. S., D’Netto, B., Fitzpatrick, P., & Noori, H. (2001a). The roles and responsibilities of
production/operations managers in smes: Evidence from Canada. Technovation, 21(7),
437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(00)00060-2
Strauch, B. (2021). John Senders, human error, and system safety. Human Factors: The Journal
of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 65(5), 766–778.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211001982
ILP: PART 6 – CRP - TESLA 15
Tseng, M.-L., Wu, K.-J., & Nguyen, T. T. (2011). Information Technology in Supply Chain
Management: A case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 25, 257–272.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.546
Xu, H., Horn Nord, J., Brown, N., & Daryl Nord, G. (2002). Data quality issues in implementing
an ERP. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(1), 47–58.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570210414668
