LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 1
Literature Review: Organizational Behavior
John “Keith” Baker, Jr
School of Business, Liberty University
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 2
Abstract
Organizational behavior (OB) can be studied through many lenses, this study focuses on the OB
aspects of individual behavior, group behavior, organizational structure and design, leadership
and management, communication, power and influence, change management, and job
satisfaction and stress. The purpose of this research is to analyze how these different elements
interact within organizations and how they can influence employee behavior, motivation,
satisfaction, and performance. Using a comprehensive framework, this study examines
organizational behavior through eight key aspects. Individual behavior is investigated through
the lens of perception, motivation, and personality, exploring how the differences between
individuals shape their behaviors and how they react to their environment. The element of group
behavior is analyzed in terms of cooperation, team dynamics, and conflict management,
illuminating how groups successfully function and how these groups influence the outcomes of
the organization. Organizational structure and design are explored in terms of hierarchy,
authority, and culture, shedding light on formal and informal aspects that shape organizational
behavior. Leadership and management practices are studied to further understand how various
styles and approaches affect employees and their motivation and performance. Communication
within organizations is examined at both interpersonal and organizational levels, evaluating how
information flow and communication structures change employee behavior and management
decision-making. Power and influence dynamics are explored, investigating sources of power
and political behavior, assisting to understand how both individuals and groups exert their
influence within the structure of the organization. Change management strategies are evaluated
to understand how organizations can effectively implement and navigate change while managing
employee resistance. Finally, the study examines the factors contributing to job satisfaction and
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 3
stress, offering insights into enhancing employee well-being and performance. Overall, this
research provides a comprehensive understanding of organizational behavior and offers practical
implications for leaders and managers to improve organizational effectiveness and employee
well-being.
Outline
I. Abstract
II. Introduction
A. Organizational Behavior (OB) is a segment of organizational theory that analyzes the
behavior of;
1. Individuals
2. Groups
3. Structures
B. OB aims to understand and predict how people and groups of people act, react, and
interact with one another.
C. OB examines various concepts such as motivation, leadership style, and personality.
D. OB is concerned with cognitive and emotional differences among people.
III.Findings: Eight key aspects of organizational behavior will be discussed.
A. Individual behavior
1. Motivation is examining the factors of effort and how meeting certain needs and
desires drives desired behavior.
2. Personality and perception examine the impact of individual differences in
personality traits and how perceptions will affect how individuals respond to their
environment.
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 4
B. Group behavior
1. Team dynamics studies how individuals come together to form groups or teams and
how those teams use process, communication, and leadership to drive performance.
2. Conflict and cooperation explore how conflict arises within groups and examines
strategies for managing and resolving conflicts.
C. Organizational structure and design
1. Hierarchy and authority explores the formalized structures within the organization
including;
a. hierarchical levels
b. reporting relationships
c. lines of authority
2. Organizational culture analyzes the shared values, beliefs, and norms that shape the
organization’s environment and influences the organizational behavior.
D. Leadership and management
1. Leadership styles analyzes different approaches to leadership and how those styles
impact employee motivation, satisfaction, and performance.
2. Management practices studies how managers lead, plan, organize, and control the
resources within the organization to achieve their goals.
E. Communication
1. Interpersonal communication analyzes how information flows within the
organization, looking at how the flow of information influences perceptions and
behaviors.
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 5
2. Organizational communication examines the broad communication structures,
channels of communication, and information networks at the organizational level.
F. Power and influence
1. Sources of power investigates the power bases within organizations including;
a. Expert knowledge
b. Legitimate authority
c. Personal relationships
2. Political behavior explores how individuals and groups wield power to achieve their
own desires and objectives and influence the decision-making processes within the
organization.
G. Change management
1. Resistance to change investigates the factors that contribute to the resistance
organizations run into when implementing change and explores various strategies to
manage and overcome that resistance.
2. Organizational development studies the interventions and strategies that leaders can
use to improve the organization's effectiveness and adaptability.
H. Job satisfaction and stress
1. Job satisfaction focuses on the understanding of factors that contribute to employee
satisfaction and enhanced engagement within the workplace.
2. Stress management explores strategies to mitigate stress within the workplace and
studies the impact of various stressors on the performance of the individual and
organization.
IV. Conclusions, recommendations, and suggestions for further study
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 6
V. References
Introduction
In the world of organizational theory, the segment of organizational behavior (OB)
analyzes organizations based on the behaviors of individuals, groups, and structures that exist to
make up the organization (Daft, 2020). The aim of OB is to understand and predict how groups
of people act, react, and interact with one another within the organization and how that effects
the organization’s productivity and profitability. By examining various concepts such as
motivation, leadership style, and personality, OB gives greater insight for managers and assists in
developing more refined management skills when working with employees, peers, and superiors.
The present literature review will examine eight broader aspects of OB individual behavior,
group behavior, organizational structure and design, leadership and management,
communication, power and influence, change management, and job satisfaction and stress. Each
aspect of OB works together to help today’s business manager develop stronger people
management skills, improving productivity and profitability for their organization.
Findings
Managers today are challenged with the fact that any group, team, or organization is
made up of individuals and those individuals each bring their own cultural, generational,
traumatic, experiential, and motivational backgrounds into the team or organization. With teams
that now may have generational representation that spans Boomers, Generation X, Millennials,
and Generation Z, it is more important now than ever that managers have a deep understanding
of individuals and take the time and care needed to understand individuals and how they work
together. Understanding what motivates the individuals on the team is key to successfully
leading a team, and the strong emotion of envy is one that leads to both positive and negative
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 7
motivation in an individual. Tussing et al. (2022) take the time to examine the effect that envy
has in the workplace, specifically how the emotion of envy relates to absenteeism and turnover
within the workplace, key factors to creating a successful and productive working environment.
The team hypothesized that for individuals characterized by high levels of communion or status
striving, envy is positively associated with absenteeism, consequently leading to increased
turnover; conversely, for those with high achievement striving, envy is associated with fewer
instances of absenteeism, ultimately reducing turnover. Overall, they found that envy can make
some people want to avoid work, but their research lacked strong evidence that the high
achieving striving group had less absenteeism and turnover (Tussing et al., 2022). For the
purpose of this literature review, the particular emotions of envy and jealousy are indicative of
common workplace feelings and able to assist in the review to show how managers are able to
navigate such emotions to help employees overcome them and reduce both absenteeism and
turnover among their employees. Envy and jealousy are two emotions that have heightened with
the proliferation of social media in our society, with such strong emotions prevalent in the
workplace, managers must be aware of them not only within oneself but also among their
employees and use other tactics discussed in the review to improve workplace engagement and
employee motivation.
Beyond the motivation and emotions that steer them, a good manager also must
understand how personality and an individual’s perception of their world around them plays into
the workplace. Meixner and Pospisil (2021) investigate how employees’ personality traits, their
commitment to the organization, and their perception of their leaders' behavior and
communication relate to each other. They review existing literature on organizational
commitment and leadership styles, focusing on transformational, transactional, and avoidant
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 8
leadership styles. Each of the leadership styles along with employee personality are seen as
potential factors influencing how committed employees are to any given organization,
considering both their emotional and behavioral aspects of commitment. The findings revealed
that employee personality, particularly conscientiousness and to some extent neuroticism, along
with perception of transformational leadership style and communication quality, were predictors
of both emotional and behavioral commitment. Together, these factors accounted for about 30%
of the variance in organizational commitment, which underscores the importance of leadership
and communication in fostering organizational commitment, along with the influence of
employee personality. Furthermore, the study provides evidence supporting the validity of
measuring emotional and behavioral commitment (Meixner & Pospisil, 2021). Both the
personality and perception of the employee along with the motivation discussed in article by
Tussing et al. (2022) come together to form a more holistic understanding of individual behavior
and how managers are better able to lead their employees and improve their management skills,
navigating these particularly difficult waters. With this understanding of the pairing of
personality and motivation, leaders and managers are able to better direct their actions and
leadership styles to help increase employee commitment to the organization thus reducing
absenteeism and turnover within the organization.
Once the manager is aware of and continues to grow in their development of
understanding and leading individuals, the forming of teams and leading those teams effectively
is the next important step to successful leadership. Having a grasp in understanding of team
dynamics are the first key to leading teams in an organization, and no team comes without any
type of conflict. Kaur and Ren (2023) take the bold step to challenge the prevailing notion in
research, which typically focuses on the negative effects of splits within teams, and instead
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 9
argues that these divisions can also arise from positive psychological traits, leading to a divide
that ultimately enhances team performance. The team presents a conceptual model that connects
employees' psychological capital with the prevailing theory and proposes its influence on team
performance. They also examine how time and team goal orientation can positively moderate
this effect. The findings suggest that while initial divisions may occur, positive conflicts can
improve team performance (Kaur & Ren, 2023). Building on motivation and personality, these
findings can be used to further explore and give insights to today’s manager in how to help guide
teams and their dynamics, specifically understanding how to better frame conflict and division
within teams to help guide teams toward positive resolution and performance. By having a
deeper understanding of not only how conflicts arise but also how conflict function, the
reframing of conflict into a positive within and for the team will help shape and enhance
managerial skills to go beyond simply avoiding conflict but instead working through it and
making it an asset and not a liability.
Managers should consider not only how they as an individual but also how the structures
within an organization can help guide and reduce conflict within teams. Andrade and Neves
(2022) researched how perceived support from an organization and conflicts between coworkers
and work and family life influence three types of helpful behaviors at work. The researchers
collected data focusing on elderly care homes and used the structural equation statistical model
to conclude that feeling supported by the organization is directly related to these helpful
workplace behaviors, both by itself and indirectly through reducing conflicts between work and
family life. Additionally, conflicts with coworkers were also connected to these helpful
behaviors (Andrade & Neves, 2022). Having a thorough understanding of the relationship
between organizational support and coworker conflicts through the lens of work-family conflict
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 10
will help managers in any organization with useful insights for improving these behaviors
through actively managing them. By coupling with the use of positive framing of conflict within
teams, these findings offer guidance for managers to create better working conditions for their
employees where support from their organization and conflicts between coworkers are
effectively managed.
With the idea of conflict being so daunting and so many wanting to simply avoid conflict,
it is important to take additional time to understand the navigation of conflict within teams in the
workplace. Zahid and Nauman’s (2023) research aims to investigate how perceived rudeness and
incivility within the workplace is linked to employees’ harmful behaviors, drawing on the
conservation of resources theory. Specifically, the study examines whether interpersonal conflict,
which has been less explored in previous research on workplace rudeness, plays a role in this
relationship. Additionally, the researchers explore whether the organizational climate, considered
as a valuable resource, affects the connection between perceived workplace rudeness and
employees' harmful behaviors. The study utilized a time-lagged research design, collecting
survey data in the service sector at two different time points. The findings indicate that
interpersonal conflict partially mediates the relationship between workplace rudeness and
harmful work behaviors. Moreover, the study suggests that the negative effects of workplace
rudeness on employees' harmful behaviors are reduced when there is a positive organizational
climate (Zahid & Nauman, 2023). These findings contribute to a better understanding of how
interpersonal conflict mediates and organizational climate can moderate the relationship between
workplace rudeness and incivility and harmful work behaviors. When put together holistically
with positively reframing conflict as an asset along with the organizational support, the use of
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 11
these tools will allow each manager to better navigate the increasing level of conflicts found in
today’s workplace environments.
As a manager’s experience leads to a better understanding and development of leadership
skills first for individuals, then as those individuals work within groups, the next level of
thinking a manager must grow into is the understanding of how organizational structure and
design work to affect individuals and groups, both from a hierarchical approach and from the
organizational culture as a whole. Schweisfurth et al. (2023) led a team of researchers that took
care in delving into the increasingly popular tactic of companies adopting distributed decision-
making processes involving employees at all levels and investigates how hierarchy influences
idea evaluation in supposedly hierarchy-free systems. The researchers argue that hierarchy
remains a factor, leading to bias in idea evaluation decisions due to those that they most closely
identify with. Analyzing data from internal crowdfunding at a major industrial manufacturer, the
study reveals that evaluators tend to overvalue ideas from individuals with similar hierarchical
positions. This bias is moderated by competition and uncertainty; proximity to competitors
mitigates the bias, while novelty amplifies it (Schweisfurth et al., 2023). This research helps
contribute to understanding decision biases in centralized versus distributed innovation and the
role of structural similarity in employee behavior. With managers understanding the formation
and presence of this bias, driven by identification with hierarchical peers, they can make fewer
poor decisions and help lead peers and employees away from suboptimal strategic decisions.
Distributed decision making is one culture that is attractive to the Millennial generation,
but it is important for leaders to be aware of the implications that not only the hierarchy structure
of an organization but how the individual and their behaviors all play into the organizational
culture as a whole. In the face of the challenges in today’s business landscape, Abdullah et al.
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 12
(2021) investigate how counterproductive work behavior (CWB) impacts the performance of
companies by examining the mediating role of organizational culture and its influence on both
CWB and organizational performance. The data used in their research was collected through an
employee questionnaire and the responses were analyzed using various statistical techniques
such as descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and structural equation modeling. The research
findings indicate that CWB and organizational culture partially mediate the relationship between
CWB and company performance, offering insights that can inform organizational policies and
strategies (Abdullah et al., 2021). It is key for managers to appreciate the importance of
addressing CWB and fostering a positive organizational culture to enhance overall organizational
performance. When considered with hierarchy and lines of authority, being cognizant of the
layers of complexity that go into the building of a strong organizational culture will assist the
manager within any organization in using appropriate hierarchical and authoritative strategies to
build positive culture and improve the performance of the individuals, teams, and organization.
When a leader today has found their style in leading individuals, helping guide conflict
withing groups, and building a holistic organizational culture, taking an inward look to their own
leadership styles and management practices will play a critical role in how successful any leader
can be. With the bulk of today’s workforce under the age of 40, and gender issues playing such a
dominant role in today’s culture and business discussions, leaders today must take pay careful
attention to these issues when developing their own leadership and management styles. Berdecia-
Cruz et al. (2022) conducted a study that aims to address the gap between the growing
importance of innovative mentality and the lack of academic research on the subject by
examining how the innovative mentality of leaders aged 40 and under influences
transformational and/or transactional leadership styles. Additionally, it analyzes whether the
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 13
leadership style of "40 Under 40" leaders impacts organizational behavior towards innovation,
ultimately driving organizational success. Using the partial least squares structural equations
method, hypotheses were analyzed with data collected from professionals recognized as "40
Under 40" by the Caribbean Business Magazine in Puerto Rico. The study attempts to introduce
a new theory on leadership, emphasizing the innovative mentality as a central axis that
influences various leadership styles. Furthermore, it explores gender differences and finds that
women, particularly when employing transactional leadership, play a highlighted role in
fostering organizational innovative behavior (Berdecia-Cruz et al., 2022). The findings suggest
that leaders who exhibit an innovative mentality tend to adopt unique leadership approaches that
contribute to organizational success. Today’s leaders are able to use these findings to overcome
leading what is generally regarded as a challenging generation of employees by recognizing and
fostering an innovative mentality among young leaders, thus allowing managers to leverage this
aspect to achieve greater success.
Leadership styles today must be analyzed fully and developed through time and
collaboration with peers to evolve management practices that are successful across generations.
Sarwar et al. (2022) looked at how ethical leadership influences employees’ behavior in the
workplace, specifically their organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). They also explored
whether certain managerial practices could make the relationship between the two stronger. They
collected data from employees and their supervisors and used partial least squares structural
equation modeling to analyze the data. Their findings showed that employees psychological
empowerment plays a role in how ethical leadership affects their OCB, also finding that certain
high-performing managerial practices can make this relationship even stronger, meaning they
can make ethical leaders more effective in encouraging positive behavior among employees
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 14
(Sarwar et al., 2022). These findings help provide valuable insights for managers and
organizations looking to improve employee behavior and leadership effectiveness. These, along
with the leadership findings found in the article by Berdecia-Cruz et al. (2022), help managers
and organizations form positive, innovative, and ethical leadership styles that will encourage
positive employee behaviors, innovation within the organization, and increased organizational
success.
Communication, both interpersonal and organizational, is key to strong cultural
environments, as people that feel voids in communication tend to have lower satisfaction rates
and higher rates of turnover (Tussing et al., 2022). The research team of Methot et al. (2021)
looked at a previously overlooked topic of interpersonal communication through small talk, the
casual conversations that are not directly related to work tasks but are common in workplaces,
and how small talk might actually not simply be a distraction but have a positive meaningful
effect on employees. By combining theories of interaction rituals and micro-role transitions, the
researchers explored how and why these seemingly unimportant conversations during the
workday have impacts on employees and managers alike. To understand this better, the
researchers collected data from employed adults over a three-week period using a method called
experience sampling. They were the first to study small talk as something that happens from
moment to moment, and they validated their findings with master's students and other groups of
employed adults. In their analysis of the data, they found that small talk had positive effects,
such as boosting employees' positive social emotions and leading to more helpful behaviors at
work, organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB), as well as enhancing overall well-being by the
end of the workday. However, they also found that small talk could be distracting, making it
harder for employees to focus on their work tasks, which in turn could compromise their OCB. It
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 15
was ultimately discovered that individuals who were better at adjusting their behavior based on
social cues, known as high trait-level self-monitoring, were less affected by the negative aspects
of small talk on work engagement (Methot et al., 2021). The work of the team suggests that
small talk, with its polite and routine nature, can have both positive and negative effects on
employees, providing those moments that can be uplifting but managers also need to help guide
their employees so that they can limit the potential distractions. Combined with the overall
organizational communication strategy, the appropriate use of small talk within the organization
can positively influence employee OCB.
Beyond the small talk and interpersonal communication that the organization can help
guide, but generally has little direct control over, the communication strategy within the
organization is equally as important to a successful business culture. With millennial employees
making up a large portion of today’s workforce, Lee (2021) focuses on millennial employees and
explores two types of communicative behaviors they engage in: scouting, where they actively
seek and share task and managerial information, and internal megaphoning, where they discuss
positive and negative aspects of their organization with internal members. Using the social
exchange theory and the symmetrical communication model, the study investigates how
inclusive leadership and internal communication affect those behaviors among millennial
employees. The researchers conducted an online survey with full-time millennial employees
across various industry sectors. The study reveals that when internal communication is
symmetrical and influenced by inclusive leadership, it enhances employees' scouting behavior
and positive internal megaphoning behavior. Moreover, engaging in both positive and negative
internal megaphoning with supervisors increases employees' scouting behavior. Interestingly,
they found that negative internal megaphoning with peers does not significantly impact scouting
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 16
behavior (Lee, 2021). Lee (2021) helps shed light on the importance of inclusive leadership and
symmetrical internal communication in promoting active information behaviors among the
millennial demographic. When viewed in conjunction with the findings on small talk, managers
can better formulate a culture that values effective interpersonal as well as organizational
communication strategies in helping lead all generations, but especially the one that is culturally
most misunderstood, the millennials.
The draw of leadership to many is the perceived access to power and influence over those
around them and to the decisions that affect their day to day lives. Managers today need to
understand their own motivations of power as well as how the motivations of power and
influence of those around them play into the various aspects of the organization, individuals, and
teams. The legitimacy of information within a company, or how well received shared
information is among peers and leadership, is a clear indicator of power perceptions within an
organization. Nakanishi (2022) aims to create a of model of explaining how knowledge becomes
legitimate in organizations by focusing on the relationship between political power dynamics and
legitimacy of the knowledge. The study takes a conceptual approach, engaging in discussion
rather than empirical research like other studies in this review. The author developed a model
illustrating how individuals exert power and how knowledge gains legitimacy through the
political processes in an organization. It identifies various factors influencing power dynamics,
which either encourage or hinder the exercise of power. The study also explores how different
types of power, such as influence or domination, lead to different forms of legitimacy, like
pragmatic or moral. Additionally, it highlights the interconnectedness between power politics
and organizational learning, showing how the legitimacy of knowledge is influenced by actors'
power and, in turn, enhances their power (Nakanishi, 2022). Managers today can use the findings
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 17
of this study to enhance their understanding of the relationship between power dynamics and the
legitimacy of knowledge within an organization. These findings pair nicely with other articles
that examine the distribution of lines of authority as well as with interpersonal and organizational
communication structures, helping to improve the understanding of managers in how
organizational processes shape employee behavior and ultimately organizational outcomes.
The world continues to get smaller with the globalization of nearly every industry within
the business world. With this globalization comes an increasing number of outside influences on
any business, thus causing continual opportunities for changes within the organizational
behaviors and structures. Leaders must not only be cognizant of the increasing number of
influences but must be adept and adopting change and leading their individuals, teams, and
organizations through periods of change, both great and small. In this light, Sverdlik and Oreg
(2022) investigate how employees and their organizations respond to changes, focusing on the
dispositional resistance to change, which refers to the individuals’ tendencies to resist change.
The research team investigated how this resistance can characterize entire organizations, not just
individuals. They used a subject set that is particularly known for resistance to change, collecting
data from principals and teachers to understand how both individual and collective resistance to
change to predict employees' attitudes toward organizational changes. The findings suggest that
employees', principals', and organizations' dispositional resistance to change all play a role in
predicting attitudes toward change (Sverdlik & Oreg, 2022). It is important for leaders to
consider both the individual and organizational factors when managing change withing the
workplace. By using a broader understanding of inclusive leadership, organizational citizenship
behavior, and individual and organizational communication structures, today’s manager will be
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 18
better equipped to navigate the landmines involved in steering an organization through inevitable
changes.
The way in which leaders develop their organizational systems and behaviors plays a
large part in how positive or negatively the organization reacts to change. Younas et al. (2020)
studied how inclusive leadership, as discussed above, influences change-oriented behaviors in
organizations, specifically focusing on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). The
researchers collected data from pairs of supervisors and subordinates working in small and
medium enterprises. The findings show that inclusive leadership is linked to an increase in
positive change-oriented OCB. The study also reveals that this relationship is mediated by two
factors: behavioral integrity and trust in leadership. Additionally, the results support a sequential
mediation model, where inclusive leadership leads to behavioral integrity, which then fosters
trust in leadership, ultimately promoting positive change-oriented OCB (Younas et al., 2020).
Leaders today must underscore the importance of fostering inclusive leadership practices for
leaders who are managing change effectively. With the learnings found within other change
management articles, there is increased usefulness in promoting inclusive leadership behaviors
and how they can enhance employees’ trust integrity, leading to more positive responsiveness to
organizational change initiatives.
With websites like Glassdoor.com and other forums dedicated to giving outsiders a look
into organizations, either encouraging or discouraging them from applying and joining the
organization, leaders and managers cannot overlook the importance of integrating leadership
styles and management skills to help develop a culture that helps improve employee job
satisfaction and reduces perceived stress in the work environment. Today’s culture can have
additional stresses and divisiveness among people based on political and social issue opinions,
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 19
causing perceived bullying and other negative behaviors in the workplace. Mendiratta and
Srivastava (2021) investigated how workplace bullying affects employees’ organizational
citizenship behavior (OCB). It follows the principles of the conservation of resources theory,
exploring the mediating roles of job satisfaction and resilience. Data from employees was
analyzed using statistical techniques like structural equation modeling and mediation analysis.
The findings reveal an unsurprising negative relationship between workplace bullying and OCB,
highlighting the importance of job satisfaction and resilience as parallel mediators in mitigating
the negative impact of workplace bullying on OCB (Mendiratta & Srivastava, 2021). The
findings should help the manager to understand valuable insights for organizations and managers
alike, helping them recognize the importance of fostering job satisfaction and resilience and the
importance of taking proactive measures to mitigate the negative consequences of workplace
bullying. By using techniques discussed in articles on organizational communication, knowledge
legitimization, inclusive leadership practices, and others, managers can develop skills in the
mitigation of those negative consequences and promotion of a positive workplace environment.
A large part of creating that positive environment is the mitigation and reduction of
perceived stress among employees. The manager needs to be aware of the environments that add
to and conversely reduce workplace stress. Schwepker et al. (2020) explored how the ethical
environments found within organizations impact employees' stress levels and well-being.
Drawing from ethical impact theory and ethical decision-making theory, the researchers
investigated the relationships among perceived organizational ethics, work-related stress, and
employee well-being. Two studies were conducted, examining factors like ethical climate,
leader/manager ethics, corporate social responsibility, and various aspects of employee well-
being. The findings reveal that organizational ethics are linked to lower work-related stress and
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 20
better employee well-being (Schwepker et al., 2020). For the manager, focus should be placed on
the promotion of ethical leadership and practices within the organization and how they can help
alleviate excessive stress among employees and enhance not only the individual well-being, but
also the overall well-being of the organization. By incorporating the importance of ethics into the
discussion found in articles about corporate climate, conflict management, and lines of authority,
the manager will be well equipped to use ethical practices to lead their employees through
change and other situations to maintain positive work environments and successful
organizational performance.
Conclusions, recommendations, and suggestions for further study
Organizational Behavior (OB) is essential for leaders and managers to develop deeper
understanding of individual, group, and structural dynamics within organizations of all sizes,
helping contribute to productivity and profitability. Today’s managers face challenges in
navigating the diverse individual backgrounds, motivations, and emotions that are increasingly
present in today’s workforce. Knowledge of how personality, motivation, and perception
significantly influence employee commitment and behavior within organizations is key to
leading effective team dynamics, conflict management, and organizational support, all helping to
foster positive workplace behaviors. Managers today must be aware of their leadership styles,
organizational culture, and communication strategies and how they play together to impact
employee behavior and organizational outcomes. Numerous factors such as power dynamics,
knowledge legitimacy, and resistance to change are significant in organizational behavior and
response to change, and ethics, both individual leadership and organizationally, play vital roles in
reducing workplace stress and promoting employee well-being.
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 21
The research present in today’s market suggest that managers should take the time and
invest in understanding individual backgrounds, motivations, and emotions effectively on diverse
teams that span across generational and cultural arenas. The importance of managers’
development of leadership skills is crucial for navigating the team dynamics, conflict resolution,
and building positive organizational culture. Leaders in today’s workplace should strategize
ways to promote open, inclusive, and effective communication within the organization, bearing
in mind individual personality needs, to enhance employee engagement and satisfaction across
all levels. The Christian manager should use ethical and biblical foundations to cultivate a
culture where leadership is ethical, and the organization remains ethical in its practice to mitigate
workplace stress and promote overall employee well-being. The use of inclusive leadership
practices and effective communication strategies is imperative for managers to navigate the
unavoidable changes the are present in today’s business environments.
With organizational behavior so spread out among industrial and organizational size, it is
key that researchers continue to update and refine information on organizational behavior. While
there are a seemingly endless list of possible future exploration into the subject, cross-cultural,
technology, gender, ethics, and innovation are a few of the topics that could be studied in relation
to organizational behavior. Exploring cross-cultural organizational behavior by investigating
how cultural differences influence cultural behavior and leadership practices, especially within
multinational organizations. Studying the effects that technology and generative AI have on
organizational behavior. Researching how gender and leadership styles and management skills
work together to improve organizational outcomes. Looking at the effect that ethical leadership
and organizational ethics have in crisis management and employee well-being. Studying
innovative leadership practices across generational lines and how each impacts the
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 22
organization’s culture, employee engagement, and performance. With further research into these
areas, scholars can contribute to a deeper understanding of organizational behavior and provide
continual valuable insights for managers to improve their leadership practices and enhance the
overall organizational effectiveness.
References
Abdullah, M. I., Huang, D., Sarfraz, M., Naseer, J., & Sadiq, M. W. (2021). Signifying the
relationship between counterproductive work behavior and firm’s performance: the
mediating role of organizational culture. Business Process Management Journal, 27(6),
1892–1911. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-12-2020-0546
Andrade, C., & Neves, P. (2022). Perceived organizational support, coworkers’ conflict and
organizational citizenship behavior: the mediation role of Work-Family Conflict.
Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010020
Berdecia-Cruz, Z., Flecha, J. A., & Ortiz, M. C. (2022). The gender differences in innovative
mentality, leadership styles and organizational innovative behavior: the case the “40
Under 40” and their impact on organizational success. European Business Review, 34(3),
411–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-07-2021-0160
Daft, R. L. (2020). Organization Theory & Design. South-Western College.P
Kaur, M., & Ren, H. (2023). Positive faultlines: an unconventional perspective on team
compositional dynamics. Team Performance Management, 29(3/4), 169–182.
https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-03-2022-0025
Lee, Y. (2021). Dynamics of millennial employees’ communicative behaviors in the workplace:
the role of inclusive leadership and symmetrical organizational communication.
Personnel Review, 51(6), 1629–1650. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2020-0676
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 23
Meixner, T., & Pospisil, R. (2021). Personality matters: prediction of organizational commitment
using leadership and personality. International Journal of Organizational Leadership.
https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2021.60529
Mendiratta, A., & Srivastava, S. (2021). Workplace bullying and organizational citizenship
behavior: the parallel mediating effects of job satisfaction and resilience. International
Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(7), 1565–1586. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-03-2021-
0417
Methot, J. R., Rosado-Solomon, E., Downes, P. E., & Gabriel, A. S. (2021). Office chitchat as a
social ritual: The uplifting yet distracting effects of daily small talk at work. Academy of
Management Journal, 64(5), 1445–1471. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1474
Nakanishi, Y. (2022). Politics-based knowledge legitimation model: power exercise in
organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 30(3), 273–289.
https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-03-2022-0039
Richardson, H. A., Kluemper, D. H., & Taylor, S. G. (2021). Too little and too much authority
sharing: Differential relationships with psychological empowerment and in‐role and
extra‐role performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(8), 1099–1119.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2548
Sarwar, N., Haider, S., Akhtar, M. H., & Bakhsh, K. (2022). Moderated-mediation between
ethical leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: the role of psychological
empowerment and high performance managerial practices. Management Research
Review, 46(5), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-07-2021-0528
LITERATURE REVIEW: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 24
Schweisfurth, T., Schöttl, C. P., Raasch, C., & Zaggl, M. A. (2023). Distributed decision‐making
in the shadow of hierarchy: How hierarchical similarity biases idea evaluation. Strategic
Management Journal, 44(9), 2255–2282. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3497
Schwepker, C. H., Valentine, S., Giacalone, R. A., & Promislo, M. D. (2020). Good barrels yield
healthy apples: Organizational Ethics as a mechanism for mitigating Work-Related stress
and promoting Employee Well-Being. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(1), 143–159.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04562-w
Sverdlik, N., & Oreg, S. (2022). Beyond the individual‐level conceptualization of dispositional
resistance to change: Multilevel effects on the response to organizational change. Journal
of Organizational Behavior, 44(7), 1066–1077. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2678
Tussing, D., Wihler, A., Astandu, T. V., & Menges, J. I. (2022). Should I stay or should I go?
The role of individual strivings in shaping the relationship between envy and avoidance
behaviors at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(4), 567–583.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2593
Younas, A., Wang, D., Javed, B., & Zaffar, M. A. (2020). Moving beyond the mechanistic
structures: The role of inclusive leadership in developing change‐oriented organizational
citizenship behaviour. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne
Des Sciences De L’Administration, 38(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1586
Zahid, A., & Nauman, S. (2023). Does workplace incivility spur deviant behaviors: roles of
interpersonal conflict and organizational climate. Personnel Review, 53(1), 247–265.
https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-01-2022-0058
