CHANGE MANAGEMENT IMAGE SELF-REFLECTION 1
Change Management Image Self-Reflection Paper Assignment
Eric Castro
School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University
BUSI 504: Leading Organizational Change
Change Management Image Self-Reflection
Both science and art are involved in change management. The Six-Images Framework
was presented by Heinz in 2021 and provides a comprehensive lens for analyzing and executing
change within an organization. The six images—director navigator caregiver coach interpreter
and nurturer—each represent distinct assumptions about the nature of change and the role
that leadership plays in enacting it. Reflecting on these images has not only helped me better
CHANGE MANAGEMENT IMAGE SELF-REFLECTION 2
understand organizational change but it has also made me confront my own biases and
tendencies as a change agent.
What are the six change management images and how would you define them?
A different metaphor for the role of the change leader is presented in each image.
1. The director says that change is a process that can be controlled where the leader plans
and guides the outcome. It assumes that change is predictable.
2. While admitting the impact of outside circumstances and complications, the Navigator
believes that leadership can affect outcomes through careful planning and direction.
3. Since historical events and external factors have a significant impact on development,
the Caretaker adopts a more passive stance the leader’s role is to maintain stability and
respond appropriately.
4. The Coach believes that transformation results from team learning and organizational
capacity building which is why they place a high value on development.
5. The interpreter acts as a sense-maker helping others understand change by crafting
gripping tales.
6. Finally, the Nurturer views change as essentially unexpected and largely uncontrollable
emphasizing the development of resilience and flexibility over control.
How would you describe their corresponding approaches to change management?
From directive to emergent approaches the six images of change management offer
executives a range of viewpoints on comprehending and executing organizational change.
Because they emphasize top-down control planning and organization the Director and Navigator
images are suitable for situations that call for precise objectives and quick decisions. Leaders
that emphasize sense-making adaptation and guiding others through uncertainty on the other
hand are reflected in the Interpreter and Nurturer imagery which suggests a belief in the
emergent nature of change (Lindsay & Friesen, 2020). These models show that cultural and
contextual factors have a significant impact on change which is often unexpected.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT IMAGE SELF-REFLECTION 3
In today’s complex and rapidly evolving organizational environments the framework
prioritizes leadership flexibility over inflexibility. Rather than depending on a single image
successful change leaders must assess the situation within their organization and modify their
strategy as necessary. Leaders can combine structure with flexibility control with trust and
strategic planning with empathy thanks to this dynamic approach. Thus, in addition to serving as
a model for leadership conduct the Six-Images Framework is a useful tool for negotiating the
complexity and diversity of contemporary change initiatives.
Detail the results of your assessment, including top image or images, if those images require
actions that would make you uncomfortable, and whether you feel you could navigate
between strong and weak images based on the situational context.
Coach and Navigator were my primary images once I completed the textbooks
selfassessment. The Navigator and I share a preference for analytical thinking and strategic
planning. I feel more in control when I make backup plans and map out my options when faced
with uncertainty.
On the other hand, since I usually try to empower people encourage learning and foster
development the Coach image fits with my relationship approach. Nevertheless, I found that the
Caretaker image was a barrier. It seems unduly passive to accept outside forces as the primary
forces behind change which is an unsettling idea. In a similar vein the Nurturer concept is
intriguing in theory, but it demands an unnatural amount of control from me. However, I am
aware that mature leadership requires flexibility—moving from one’s default mode to a strong
or weak image based on the circumstance. Adaptive change leaders must know when to enable
and when to direct based on contextual cues claims Burke (2022).
What is your assessment of the image(s) of Eddie Lampert in this scenario?
Eddie Lampert’s Sears leadership largely embodies the Directors persona possibly to an
extent. His rigorous control over business units (through a hedge fund decentralization model)
and top-down restructuring strategy showed that he believed in the ability of financial
CHANGE MANAGEMENT IMAGE SELF-REFLECTION 4
reasoning and competition to bring about change. This methodical approach however
disregarded the cultural and psychological facets of change. No indication of guidance
understanding or nurturing was present. The company’s fractured culture and incapacity to
adapt comprehensively to shifting market realities were undoubtedly exacerbated by this (Heinz
2021).
Using your dominant image or images, how would you have approached the change
management efforts by Eddie Lampert at Sears?
The Navigator-Coach orientation is what I would have leaned into if I were Lampert. I
would have conducted a comprehensive stakeholder and market analysis as a Navigator
identifying departmental interdependencies rather than divisions. Sears needed a single
integrated approach rather than several rival silos.
Rebuilding internal trust and collaboration would have been my goal as a coach with a
focus on cross-functional learning teams and shared visioning. One of the main goals would
have been to foster leadership at all levels. The skilled workforce and Sears rich history were
underutilized human resources. Research suggests that leaders who display transformational
characteristics and adapt their approach to employee requirements are more likely to create
positive reactions to change (Hakel, 2019). By encouraging a growth culture and developing
internal change agents Sears could have transformed into a more customer-focused and agile
company.
This reminds us that just as a body, though one, has many parts according to the Bible.
Christ is as well (New International Bible, 1973/2011, 1 Corinthians 12:12). When
interdependence and unity are maintained, organizations thrive. The corporate structure was
broken by Lamperts competitive strategy. A biblical paradigm of stewardship and service would
have prioritized social flourishing over personal success (New International Bible, 1973/2011,
Mark 10:45).
Conclusion
CHANGE MANAGEMENT IMAGE SELF-REFLECTION 5
Effective change leadership I’ve learned from the Six-Images Framework requires not
only strategy but also self-awareness contextual sensitivity and a spiritual foundation. I can lead
with structure and empathy thanks to my skills as a coach and navigator. I am nevertheless also
compelled to become adaptable understanding when to employ various images in response to
intricate situations.
In hindsight Lamperts failure at Sears highlights the perils of unwavering loyalty to a
single image especially one that prioritizes control over culture. As leaders we have an
obligation to understand the human aspect of change as well as its scientific component. Thats
basically what transformational leadership is all about.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT IMAGE SELF-REFLECTION 6
References
1 Corinthians 12:12 (NIV). (1973/2011). Bible Gateway.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?
search=1%20Corinthians%2012%3A12&version=NIV
Burke, W. W. (2022). Organization development. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.734
Hakel, M. D. (2019). The Handbook of Strategic 360 Feedback Edited by Allan H. Church, David
W. Bracken, John W. Fleenor, and Dale S. Rose. New York: Oxford University
Press, 2019, 562 pages, $95 hardcover. Personnel Psychology, 72(3), 480–482.
https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12349
Heinz, A. (2021). Leading Organizational Change (Liberty University Custom ed.). McGraw-
Hill Education.
Lindsay, D. R., & Friesen, K. L. (2020). Interdisciplinary Leadership: Collectively driving the field
forward: Priority 7 of the National Leadership Education Research Agenda 2020–
2025. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(3), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21715
Mark 10:45 (NIV). (1973/2011). Bible Gateway. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?
search=MArk%2010%3A45&version=NIV
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
