RISK AND INTEGRATION 1
Kevin Lacey
BMAL 714
Risk and Integration
5/14/2021
RISK AND INTEGRATION 2
Abstract
Risk Management is one of the main considerations that impact the output of associations. The
skills of the leaders to initiate key factors of assessing the risks confronting the association add to
the general performance of the organization just as the output of individual workers. Along these
lines, risk management assumes an essential part in upgrading the overall performance in an
association. This paper assesses the connection between strategic leadership and risk
management. A significant point of view embraced in this paper is the conversation of the
meaning of strategic leadership. Strategic Leadership depends on different pillars which decide
its effect on the performance of an organization. Loyalty, stance/viewpoint, responsibility and
correspondence are among the critical mainstays of strategic leadership that characterize its
importance. The risk management considerations received by managers are spitting images of the
scriptural encounters where various leaders and witnesses confronted extensive danger that
affected the directions of their professions and the gospel at large. This paper explores along
these lines of risk management hazard plans as a component of strategic leadership with regards
to scriptural points of view.
RISK AND INTEGRATION 3
Introduction
The significance of administration is stitched in its ability to assess the dangers confronting the
various groups and set up guidelines of tending to these dangers. It is fundamental to consider
the various jobs that leadership plays in setting up a feeling of order that rises above the extra
dangers associations face. There is a need to consider the impact of leadership in featuring the
given spaces of worry that would be considered to relieve various dangers that influence an
association's perspective. Strategic Leadership is one of the basic ways to deal with management
that spotlights on the administrator's capacity to recognize a vision for the company. Different
considerations are utilized in creating the company vision, particularly in moderating various
dangers that could hamper the organization's output. Subsequently, strategic leadership
underlines the centrality of methodology in deciding the performance and the risk management
of dangers and different challenges.
Strategic leadership
The conversation of risk management in strategic leadership should consider an explanation of
strategic leadership as an ideal methodology to management or leadership. As indicated by
Golensky and Hager (2010), strategic leadership centers on motivating the association's workers
to embrace offered techniques to work with organizational change. The strategic leader’s
productivity is implanted in their capacity to impact the representatives to execute given changes.
As indicated by Shao (2019), strategic leadership builds up the significance of strategic
productivity in the association. Strategic productivity depends on the production of an ideal
climate that would work with the progressions inside the association. A reasonable climate
empowers the workers to forecast the association's requirements as expansions of their sets of
RISK AND INTEGRATION 4
responsibilities (Shao, 2019). The importance of system is along these lines interlaced with the
effect that strategic leadership has on its performance. Subsequently, strategic risk management
should consider the various components of strategic leadership as the focal factor that impacts
the systems embraced in overseeing organizational risks.
Strategic Leadership is based on different rules that direct the performance of strategic leaders
across various associations. Risk Management is a mind boggling measure reliant upon the
leader's determination in tending to the arising difficulties in an association (Yilmaz and Flouris,
2017). Along these lines, strategic leadership is based on different pillars that add to each leader's
proficiency in an association. The Bible perceives various qualities that correspond with strategic
leadership’s foundations in accomplishing the ideal risk management methodologies that will
spike organizational productivity. The Bible perceives the significance of inspiration and
responsibility as important values that impact a leader's importance in an association (Ayers,
2006). Each conversation of the impact of strategic leadership should think about these pillars,
which educate strategic leader’s behavior and decision making cycles.
Among the upsides of strategic leadership, reliability, and point of view are remarkable variables
that characterize the decision making process in overseeing risks. Reliability is characterized as
the leader's activities inside the setting of organizational vision and mission (Slagmulder and
Devoldere, 2018). Studies show that each leader should feature essential components of their
work plan and walk the talk with respect to completing tasks. To mitigate risk requires dynamic
countermeasures to intercede in the appearance of different dangers (Yilmaz and Flouris, 2017).
Likewise, a diverse point of view is necessary in impacting the leader's capacity to set up
essential visions that will influence the organization's production about the arising dangers and
difficulties. Each leader rebuked to show insight in their associations with their supporters and
RISK AND INTEGRATION 5
their way to deal with the various issues they face. The New Testament highlights different rulers
whose information has been utilized to assess Christian visionary and strategic leadership (Ayers,
2006). The strategic leader should have a more comprehensive point of view of all that occurs in
and without the association.
Inspiration and reasonable utilization of force are additionally imperative pillars that characterize
strategic leadership. As indicated by Slagmulder and Devoldere (2018), a strategic leader’s
capacity to address the dangers in an association should think about their degree of inspiration
and utilization of force and the power instruments available to them. Once more, intelligence is
featured by Shao (2019) as the determiner of the use of force by strategic leaders. The leader
should make an area of influence inside which they will rouse the organization workers to run
after a given vision. The leader's inspiration should likewise be clear in the usefulness of the
organization's vision and mission (Golensky and Hager, 2020). Leadership is portrayed as the
process of motivating and affecting others in a predetermined direction. Accordingly, the leader's
inspiration will affect the association's mentalities towards different issues.
An appointment of power and jobs likewise resists strategic leadership. The strategic leader’s
usefulness is determined by its capacity to take advantage of its various capacities towards
accomplishing a given objective (Golensky and Hager, 2020). An appointment of power is a
fundamental procedure that structures a pillar in the danger mediation systems adopted in
strategic leadership. Further, the strategic leader should make the space for disappointment inside
the association. A significant thought in building up risk management measures is the space for
misfortune as an alternative outcome. Slagmulder and Devoldere (2018) think that a strategic
leader should accept the extra dangers that characterize risk management. Another mix of pillars
that characterize strategic leadership is integrity and open communication. The scriptural
RISK AND INTEGRATION 6
viewpoint of leadership promoted open correspondence based on trustworthiness in the change-
communication procedures (Shao, 2019). The productivity of the risk management techniques
should consider the part of open communication among the association workers in improving the
results of the cycles. The leader should stay transparent in the flow of data to the subordinates
(Golensky and Hager, 2020). The danger assessment measure is subject to trustworthiness as the
premise of building up alleviation measures and other essential interventions. Kim (2019) talks
about that clear and concise works with communication that upgrades the improvement of
organizational practices towards moderating the critical dangers that undermine the association's
stability. These are basic pillars that build up the meaning of strategic leadership in the
administration of corporate risks.
Subsequently, the improvement of a risk management plan should be affected by the various
components of strategic leadership that have been featured in this paper. Woods (2012) contends
that the definition of organization strategy should be influenced by the other social elements,
financial components, and ecological factors that impact the given association's productivity. The
significance of strategy is implanted in its definition as a strategy of action towards meeting
given objectives (Kim, 2019). The risk management plan should consider the accessible
decisions that characterize the methodology detailing in an association. Each step that is
embraced in the risk management plan should consider every one of the components that
characterize the inside environment of the association. Woods (2012) contends that the impact of
corporate administration is attached to the productivity of the plans embraced in the
characterizing of the risk management plan. Comparable issues are featured by Shao (2019) who
distinguishes different components of strategic leadership that support its helpfulness in tending
RISK AND INTEGRATION 7
to a portion of the challenges acknowledged during risk management. The productivity of the
risk management process is fundamental in upgrading its results in each association.
Risk Management Plan
Risk Management is an essential moderating measure that is constantly received by given
organizations in tending to different difficulties that influence these associations' performance.
Wood (2012) contends that risk management plans structure the premise of the decision making
interaction that impacts various associations' authority. Accordingly, the risk management plan
should diagram basic components that will work with the goal of the difficulties confronting the
association. Wright (2017) additionally talks about the significance of the risk management plan
in building up a feeling of order that works with the proper coordination of the association's
fundamental components. Further, Woods (2012) features the connection between risk
management and corporate administration by assessing the impact of compliance based risk
management in corporate administration. The job of corporate administration relies upon the
proficiency of the risk management plans and the accuracy of the solutions picked in an
association.
Development of a risk management plan
A risk management plan defines the definition and ways to deal with various dangers. Durst et al.
(2019) note that the risk's plan should distinguish the key components and partners that will be
included at each phase of tending to the dangers in an association. It is fundamental,
consequently, that a risk management plan thinks about the basic steps of its creation. The
strategic leaders job is to implement the technique as a critical component in the assurance of the
ways to deal with the risks in the association (Durst et al., 2019). A technique is an essential
RISK AND INTEGRATION 8
segment that should direct the design of the risk management plan embraced in an association. A
risk plan should likewise consider the internal segments that characterize the pertinence of the
plan to the association. Woods (2012) investigates the idea that the interaction of risk
management plan should feature a portion of the critical components that characterize the
internal makeup of an association. A portion of the internal risk management segments
incorporate the inner environment, which contains the organizational culture, risk cravings, and
perspectives to risk management (Woods, 2012). Objective setting, risk reaction, and monitoring
are additionally crucial segments of risk management examined by Woods (2012) in articulating
the risk management plan. The way toward building a risk management plan should think about
the probability and effect of risks in an association. A critical segment shared by Omer (2019)
takes note of the significance of risk exercises in the makeup of the risk management plan.
Exercises in this setting allude to the various techniques that will uphold executing the risk
management plan.
Parts of a risk management plan
Risk planning
The detailing of the risk management plan will consider the danger pre-planning process as a
critical piece of the association. The risk planning system merges the identification, examination,
alleviation, and communication of the possible dangers (Durst et al., 2019). The significance of
risk planning is in its contextualization of organizational danger. All things considered, the event
of any danger in an association doesn't surprise the association's authority. Strategic Leadership
is focused on essential establishments. Accordingly, the leader ought to have the option to
strategize and rouse the company's workers to create risk planning and mitigating methods fully
RISK AND INTEGRATION 9
expecting the likely dangers (Omer, 2019). Risk planning thinks about the likelihood and effect
of a danger, to the association. The probability of a danger characterizes its importance to the
association paying little heed with the impact (Kim, 2019). For example, the danger of a
transport colliding with the organization workplaces have a high effect, however less likelihood
of the workplaces are situated on the twentieth floor of a structure downtown. Every mitigation
measure that is received considers the association's risk tolerance as an imperative factor of the
risk planning process (Wright, 2017). Risk planning is an underlying advance in the
improvement of the risk management plan.
Risk identification
Risk identification is a pivotal piece of the risk management plan that should be utilized to
decide relief measures. As per Fraser and Simkins (2016), the planning period of the risk
management plan should work with the foundation of the danger breakdown structure as the
premise of the identification and characterization of dangers. For example, Wright (2017) takes
note of that danger can be grouped into three essential levels dependent on their force and effect
on the association. All project risks fall on the first level of dangers. The subsequent level has
four classes of dangers, including business risks, specialized, organizational, and project
management risks (Durst et al., 2019). The third level is more explicit, based on the classes of
dangers where dangers are additionally broken into competitors, supplies, income, equipment,
programming, organization, and communication. Risk ID systems incorporate SWOT analysis,
conceptualizing, and audit of documents, and these impact the characterization and identification
of organizational chances.
RISK AND INTEGRATION 10
Risk analysis
This is perhaps the most important stages in the risk management plan. Woods (2012)
hypothesizes that various dangers draw in various effects, and these ought to be utilized as the
reason for assessing different dangers. Hazard examination thinks about the harmony among
likelihood and effect (Omer, 2019). a high likelihood and a high effect infer that the danger of
significance to the association and ought to be considered in the planning process. The planning
cycle distinguished the blend of measures that will decide the given danger response (Durst et
al., 2019). A portion of the categories of risks dependent on investigation incorporate low,
medium, and high risks. The risk analysis stage should assess every one of the parts of the
potential risk to be sure all appropriate responses are dispersed.
Risk Response plan
The investigation of dangers prompts the improvement of different reactions that will address
the given possibilities. As per Omer (2019), the reaction depends on the significance of a danger
to the association's operations. A section of the responses incorporate avoidance, move, relief,
and acceptance (Wood, 2012). Evasion of risks implies embracing techniques that will take out
the conditions that will lead to danger. Henceforth, changing the projects scope, exchanging
project expectations, and upgrading aptitude are among the choices featured by Kim (2019). Risk
response is a critical stage in the risk management process and plan.
Risk register
The last piece of the risk management the plan is the initiation of various dangers. Kim (2019)
reiterates the significance of stating the risks in deciding the prioritization of different dangers.
Initiation takes into consideration every one of the parts of the risks, including the reactions,
RISK AND INTEGRATION 11
need, effect, and likelihood of each hazard that has been recognized in the risk management plan
(Durst et al., 2019). The various pieces of risk the executives are integral in working with an
association's reaction to extra risks.
Biblical Leadings
The New Testament highlights different indications of risk management plans among the various
rulers. The Apostles' encounters were set apart by an expanded danger of abuse and death
(Merida, 2015). It is important to take note of their reaction, which was tolerating whatever
would come upon them in the line of serving their God. For example, Paul and Silas were
imprisoned, Stephen was battered to the point of death, and different messengers confronted
various difficulties (Acts 12:1-20). The acceptance was in their obligation to continuing to
manage their job regardless of the dangers they confronted. A risk management plan is a
fundamental segment that should impact the act of strategic leadership at each stage.
Conclusion
The formula of the risk management plan is a powerful cycle that ought to be conceded because
of awareness. Each risk management plan should think about the five fundamental phases of its
creation, including risk arranging, identification, investigation, reaction, and register. There is a
need to think about the impact of administration on risk management in various associations.
There is a certain connection between risk management and strategic leadership. Taking into
account that a strategic leader relies upon the proficiency of his procedures in accomplishing the
association's vision, there is a need to investigate the impact of these systems on the risk
management plan. Administration is likewise subject to the connection between risk management
and the methodology that a leader presents in an association. The managers should lead risk
RISK AND INTEGRATION 12
management to guarantee the productivity of the decision making cycles considered in an
association. Strategic Leadership builds up a cooperative relationship with risk management, and
all things considered, each leader or CEO should join risk management plans in their
organization activities.
RISK AND INTEGRATION 13
References
Durst, S., Hinteregger, C., & Zieba, M. (2019). The linkage between knowledge risk
management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 105, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.002
Fraser, J. R., & Simkins, B. J. (2016). The challenges of and solutions for implementing
enterprise risk management. Business horizons, 59(6), 689-698.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.06.007
Golensky, M., & Hager, M. (2020). Strategic Leadership and Management in Nonprofit
Organizations: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, USA.
Kim, S. S. (2019). The role of knowledge and organizational support in explaining managers’
active risk management behavior. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2018-0159
Merida, T. (2015). Exalting Jesus in 1 & 2 Kings. B&H Publishing Group.
https://books.google.co.ke/books?
hl=en&lr=&id=lrPVCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT13&dq=exalting+jesus+in+1%262+Ki
ngs&ots=dVB4-
0a10X&sig=ZX1VjQzIKBlL73kZBIz3_JYL1BM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=exalting
%20jesus%20in%201%262%20Kings&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.ke/books?
hl=en&lr=&id=lrPVCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT13&dq=exalting+jesus+in+1%262+Ki
ngs&ots=dVB4-
0a10X&sig=ZX1VjQzIKBlL73kZBIz3_JYL1BM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=exalting
%20jesus%20in%201%262%20Kings&f=false
RISK AND INTEGRATION 14
Omer, M. S. (2019). Level of risk management practice in malaysia construction industry from a
knowledge-based PERSPECTIVE. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Construction
Management, 9(1). https://journals.iium.edu.my/kaed/index.php/japcm/article/view/338
Shao, Z. (2019). Interaction effect of strategic leadership behaviors and organizational culture on
IS-Business strategic alignment and Enterprise Systems assimilation. International
Journal of Information Management, 44, 96-108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.010
Slagmulder, R., & Devoldere, B. (2018). Transforming under deep uncertainty: A strategic
perspective on risk management. Business Horizons, 61(5), 733-743.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.05.001
Woods, M. (2012). Risk management in organizations: An integrated case study approach.
Routledge.
Wright, L. (2017). People, Risk, and Security: How to prevent your greatest asset from becoming
your greatest liability. Springer. http://210.47.10.86:8032/2017/npc3409.pdf
Yilmaz, A. K., & Flouris, T. (2017). Enterprise risk management in terms of organizational
culture and its leadership and strategic management. In Corporate risk management for
international business (pp. 65-112). Springer, Singapore.
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-4266-9_3
