The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Deviant Behaviours
One of the problems of today's society is the existence of behaviours such as lack of work,
aggression, bullying, plunder, and so on. These behaviours affect the performance of
organizations as well as on interpersonal relationships and the spirit of employee collaboration
(Woo, 2019). The emergence of such behaviours, called organizational behaviour, as deviant
behaviours, affects the extent of the organization's development. In the past decade, the issue of
work deviations and deviant behaviours in the workplace has been considered by many research
studies (Pletzer et al., 2019). Deviant behaviours in the organization have economic, social and
psychological effects. For example, the cost of stealing by employees in the United States is
estimated at $ 50 billion a year. In addition, employees with deviant behaviours have a greater
tendency to step down, increase their stress and low morale (Bodankin & Tziner, 2009).
Deviant behaviours in the workplace are intentional and arbitrary actions in opposition to
organizational norms and disadvantages for organizational performance (Singh, 2019).
According to Coulbert et al. (2004), deviant behaviour is a deliberate behaviour that violates
organizational norms and threatens the health of the organization, employees, or both. He
categorized deviant behaviours into two categories of individual deviations and organizational
deviations. Individual deviations are deviations directed towards individuals, such as rude
behaviours with colleagues and organizational deviations, a diversion that is directed at the
organization, such as a reluctance to try. The performed research focuses on the role of leaders in
shaping the concepts and behaviour of followers in the organization (Venus Lun et al, 2016).
Leaders are one of the factors influencing the behaviour of organizational members that define
values and norms and provide an image of the organization. Leaders have an effective role in the
way and amount of trust in the organization, creating mutual respect, identifying and correcting
problems and paying rewards or punishing them. Also, leadership skills in managing change,
conflicts, and managing communication and time management also play an important role in
managing deviant behaviours (Salmani et al., 2009). Madanchian et al. (2018) were the first to
study ethical leadership as a separate style and identify ethical leadership as the display of
appropriate normative behaviour through individual actions and interpersonal relationships, and
the development of such behaviours in followers through decision-making, reinforcement, and
two-way communication. (Kalshoven et al, 2011).
The two have stated that ethical leaders are ethical models that provide employees with ethical
guidelines through the process of social learning. In accordance with the theory of social learning
of individuals, they observe actions and decisions of role models and after-effects, and then
imitate what they observe (Resick et al., 2013). The structure of ethical leadership is based on the
theory of social learning. Based on this theory, ethical behaviour based on ethical values leads to
the attention and modelling of those who are witnesses to these ethical behaviours and values.
(Taqizadeh et al., 2014). Ethical leadership is a form of leadership that requires the development
of ethical standards and employee behaviour management, and implements ethical standards
with their behaviours (Yilmaz, 2010).
Ethics are the heart of leadership (Ko et al., 2019). Ethics as the regulator of human relationships
has always been of great importance. In management discussions, this internal mechanism,
without the need for external leverage, can ensure ethical performance in employees and create
an ethical organization. The role of ethics in actions and behaviours is crucial in decisions and
choices and in clashes and relationships. Hence, today's discussion of ethics and management is
one of the major issues in this field. Leaders also need morality. Because they have a
responsibility. People who are leaders like others are different, they can be the source of many
changes in behaviour. Therefore, attention to ethical virtues of the leader is one of the important
issues of leadership. Research has shown that ethical leadership style has an impact on
organizational citizenship behaviours and deviant behaviours.
The use of an ethical leadership style provides managers with a good opportunity to enhance
their organization while enhancing citizenship behaviour and reducing deviant behaviours in the
organization (De Cremer & Vandekerckhove, 2016). Ethical leadership can motivate positive
work behaviours and lead to a reduction in misconduct (De Wolde et al, 2014). In organizations
with leaders who use ethical leadership style and behave in accordance with ethical values with
employees, employee misconduct decreases (Mayer et al., 2009). Researchers believe that in
addition to personal characteristics of employees, the type or quality of leadership can play an
important role in enhancing or inhibiting such behaviours (Pradhan et al., 2014). Recent research
by Jones (2009), also shows that misconduct decreases when managers are respected and
dignified with staff about the decisions they make.
In a study of 200 companies in South Korea, Shane (2012), found that ethical leadership
indirectly affects organizational citizenship behaviour. Picolo et al. (2010) found that ethical
leadership has a positive impact on organizational citizenship behaviour by mediating the
variables of the meaningfulness of work and followers' efforts. They found that ethical
leadership has a positive impact on employees 'efforts, which in turn affects employees'
behaviour and employee behaviour through significant increases in work. Rezek et al. (2013),
examined the role of moral perception as a psychological mechanism in relation to ethical
leadership with the involvement of employees in employee voluntary behaviours. Their findings
showed that there is a negative relationship between ethical leadership and deviant behaviour
(0.28), and organizational citizenship behaviour has a positive relationship (0.36).
Avi et al. (2011), examined the relationship between ethical leadership and followers'
behaviours. The results of their research have shown that ethical leadership has a positive
relationship with the citizenship behaviour of followers and negative relation with their deviant
behaviour. The results of their research have also shown that this relationship is moderated
through the self-confidence variable. In other words, when followers are more confident, the
relationship between ethical leadership and the citizenship behaviour of followers as well as the
relationship between moral leadership and deviant behaviour of followers is weakened.
Montakhab Yegane et al. (1395), examined the relationship between ethical leadership and
deviant behaviours in the workplace, with the mediating role of emotional commitment and
ethical atmosphere. The results indicated the direct effect of ethical leadership on deviant
behaviours in the workplace and the indirect effect of ethical leadership on deviant behaviours in
the workplace through emotional commitment and ethical atmosphere. Baharlo et al. (1394)
investigated the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational citizenship behaviour.
The results indicate a direct relationship between ethical leadership and organizational
citizenship behaviour and indirect positive relationship of ethical leadership through
organizational commitment, leader- member exchange model and job satisfaction and
organizational citizenship behaviour.
In general, morality in organizations is defined as a system of values, needs, and desires, in
which the good and bad of the organization are specified and the bad action distinguished from
the good one. Humans in the individual and personal dimension have special moral attributes
that shape their thinking, speech and behaviour. These individuals, when placed in a particular
position their human attributes can affect the effectiveness and effectiveness of the organization.
On the other hand, ethics or lack of behaviours and performance can lead to positive or negative
outcomes at the organizational level (Taleh, 2009). In the same vein, many countries in the
industrialized world have reached maturity, which results in disregard for ethical issues and
evasion of social responsibilities and obligations and thus unethical conduct. For this reason,
many successful companies have felt the need to formulate a moral strategy, and they have come
to believe that an organization must embrace a culture of ethics and also create a code of ethics
for employees to abide by thus promoting right conduct (Nicolaides, 2016). Hence, they focus on
research on professional ethics (Amiri et al., 2010).
One of the main concerns of efficient managers at different levels is how to create suitable
platforms for human factors working in all professions so as to work with the sense of
responsibility and commitment when faced with issues in their community and profession. In
addition, they need to comply with the ethical principles which governing their occupation and
profession. With regard to the positive effects of professional ethics, it can be said that one of the
key factors for the success of organizations is professional ethics. Whatever professional ethics
in organizations is to be taken into account by managers and staff, the organization will be more
successful in reaching its predicted goals (Caroline & Chris, 2007). Success in an organization
results from the creation and application of ethical management in the organization.
Organizational ethics starts from a position of trust. The more trusted the organization, programs
and managers, the greater the level of commitment to the organization and tasks will be. Trusting
will increase organizational capability in responding to environmental needs, because trust
creation will be synergistic with the organization's ability. Therefore, as employees' trust in
managers and organizations diminishes, managers should also care about their employees
(Krapfl & Kruja, 2015).
Management means individuals working with groups to achieve organizational goals. The key to
success is that all managers need to have social and human skills. So, at least in certain stages of
his or her life, one is a manager. The most important skill of a manager is the ability to adapt and
deal with people. The profile of a healthy organization is that the physical and mental health is
equally considered by the manager, whose emphasis is on production and productivity. In a
healthy society, the responsibility of organizations is not limited to providing profit-making
services by the employees of that organization, and effective management is not achieved
without consideration of the mental health of the employees.
The issue of organizational behaviour is a complex issue, but it is also an influential and crucial
factor in the success and fate of organizations. Hence, the attention of scholars and researchers is
drawn to the issues affecting the workforce of organizations so that they can find ways to
empower and optimize their existing human resources. From the perspective of today, issues
related to employee behaviour are considered to be beyond the scope of occupational and
organizational homework, and this discussion has been studied as "corporate citizenship
behaviour". It is also important to pay attention to employees' deviant behaviours due to their
impact on organization and organization's development. One of the principles of the success of
today's organizations is the existence of ethical values in the workplace and the promotion of
these values and in this regard, basic theories of ethics in the workplace and moral conduct better
inform business practices so that a desired objective is achievable (Nicolaides, 2015).
Managers and leaders in organizations must rely on their skills to manage ethical values within
their organization. The behaviour of managers of organizations, especially operational managers
who are directly related to manpower, has a major impact on human resource productivity and
organizational growth and success (Nicolaides, 2015). If the relationship between managers and
employees is based on professional ethics, then this organization will definitely achieve its goals.
Also, if it is based on unethical behaviour, it will certainly prevent the organization from
achieving its goals. Therefore, how to manage the managers of organizations should be such that
by combining ethics with the current rules, the culture of useful work in the organization can be
expanded. Managers who do not care about the human dimension and professional ethics in the
organization, and willing to pursue their goals, regardless of ethics and humanity, can ignore
them in the short term, but in the long run such a view is usually creativity, efficiency, and
Reduces employee engagement and results in a dramatic drop in productivity in the organization
(De Cremer & Vandekerckhove, 2016).
Experience has shown that many of the entrepreneurial forces that are susceptible to the
organization are unclear due to managerial weakness and professional ethics failures, which
ultimately leads to the departure of the organization. Today, many of the organizational problems
are the lack of proper and professional communication between managers and employees.
Because experience shows that many managers are doing unfair behaviours with the employees
due to lack of familiarity with management science and techniques as well as professional ethics,
which ultimately leads to organizational silence or quit service from the elite employees of the
organization. Therefore, one of the problems of organizations where professional ethics is not
followed by its managers, the vacancy of the undergraduate body is prone to entrepreneurial
forces. Because the unprofessional behaviour of managers has led to the silence of many
undergraduate elite employees, or such experts at technical meetings, instead of commenting and
expressing their technical opinions, try to confirm their superiors' remarks. Such issues are
deadly and dangerous for any organization as a poison, and they break down organizations.
References
Adi, A. N. (2015). Employee Engagement Construction in Newest Condition (During 2012-
2014) Adoption to Achieve Competitiveness in Global Condition Combining with Technology
Interaction and People Value. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 2–9.
Bodankin, M. & Tziner, A. (2009). Constructive Deviance, Destructive Deviance and
Personality: How do they interrelate? The Amfitreatu Economic Journal,11(26), 549-564.
Clark, R.A., Hartline, M.D. & Jones, K.C. (2009).The Effects of Leadership Style on Hotel
Employees’ Commitment to Service Quality, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50(2), 209-231.
Cooke, F. L., Cooper, B., Bartram, T., Wang, J. & Mei, H. (2016). Mapping the relationships
between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: a study of the
banking industry in China, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–22,
DOI:10.1080/09585192.2015.1137618
De Cremer, D. & Vandekerckhove, W. (2016). Managing unethical behavior in organizations:
The need for a behavioral business ethics approach, Journal of Management & Organization,
23(03), 437–455.
Dysvik, A. & Kuvaas, B. (2008). The relationship between perceived training opportunities,
work motivation and employee outcomes. International Journal of Training and
Development, 12(3), 138–157.
El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser & Singh, Sanjay Kumar, (2019). Green innovation and organizational
performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment
and HR practices, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), 483-
498.
Emelia Amoako-Asiedu & Obuobisa-Darko, T. (2017). Leadership, Employee Engagement
and Employee Performance in the Public Sector of Ghana. Journal of Business and
Management Sciences, 5(2), 27-34.
Hassan, S., Mahsud, R., Yukl, G. & Prissia, G.E. (2013) Ethical and empowering leadership
and leader effectiveness, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(2), 133-146.
Jean, L. (2006). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment,
Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(8), 655-672.
Jones, M. K., Jones, R. J., Latreille, P. L. & Sloane, P. J. (2009). Training, Job Satisfaction, and
Workplace Performance in Britain: Evidence from WERS 2004. LABOUR, 23, 139–175.
Kafetsios , K. Nezlek, J.B. & Vassilakou, T. (2012). Relationships Between Leaders' and
Subordinates' Emotion Regulation and Satisfaction and Affect at Work, The Journal of Social
Psychology, 152 (4), 436-457,
Khuong, M.N. & Khanh, L.K. (2016). The Influence of Leadership Styles on Employee Mood
and Job Performance: A Study of Hotels and Restaurants in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam,
International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7(4), 140-147.
Krapfl, J. E. & Kruja, B. (2015). Leadership and Culture. Journal of Organizational Behavior
Management, 35(1-2), 28–43.
Kafetsios, K., Nezlek, J. B. & Vassilakou, T. (2012). Relationships Between Leaders’ and
Subordinates’ Emotion Regulation and Satisfaction and Affect at Work. The Journal of Social
Psychology, 152(4), 436–457.
Martin, A., Woods, M. & Dawkins, S. (2013). Managing Employees With Mental Health
Issues: Identification of Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge for Development Within
Management Education Curricula, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14.
Muhammad, S.K. (2011). Role of Commitment in the Development of Employee’s
Citizenship Behaviour: Evidence from banking Sector of Pakistan, International Journal of
Business and Social Science , 3(20), 247-254.
Nicolaides, A. (2016) Moral Intensity and Service Delivery in the Hospitality Industry: The
Value of Codes of Ethics, Journal of Economics, 7(2-3), 73-84.
Nicolaides, A. (2015). The paradox of Business Ethics, Quality and Leadership: the path to
business sustainability, African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 4(1), 1-20.