1 / 29100%
1 | P a g e
THE INFLUENCE OF POLITICAL RISK ON INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
OPERATIONS
1. Introduction to Political Risk
1.1 Definition of political risk
The term political risk among Alon and Herbert (2019) encapsulates all the possible political
actions or instability within a country that may impact multinational enterprises (MNEs). It
equals to an unsure outcome out of political decisions that maybe would be the result of any
change in a government policy, change of the leadership, or political instability. This is an
agonizing risk because of business' operations disruption, money loss, and the damaged
reputation that follows it. Multinational firms are active outside the national territories thus
putting them at risk of different political-economical environments and intensities of instability.
Political stability facilitates creation of the conditions for the effectuation of business, by
allowing for lengthy investments and trade without confidence shortage. Politically unstable
countries on the other hand, may bring economic turmoil to business activities, which ends up in
financial losses and supply chain disruptions. In such cases, political risk may affect the
strategic decision-making, investment plans, and market entry strategies of the MNCs. Thus, for
example, instability of the political arena, lack of legislation or policy dedication undermine the
activity of the MNEs in such countries (Cuervo-Cazurra et al. 2020). Moreover, political
vulnerability can also factor into MNEs' organizational structures, either forming joint ventures
or mergers or acquisitions, as a means of risk mitigation. ( Jiménez & Delgado- García,
2012)MNEs with many markets encounter the complexities of geopolitical tensions, trade
disturbances, and policy unpredictability across various markets simultaneously (Bremmer,
2022). This calls for a rather proactive stance in political risk assessment, scenario planning and
stakeholder management to avoid any surprises that may arise and hurt business operations and
2 | P a g e
profitability (Alon & Herbert, 2019). Political risk management is a strategic tool that is
incorporated into the strategic planning processes of MNEs.
1.2 Importance in international business
Political risk is one of the factors influencing cross-border business that is stressed by Bremmer
(2022). Large multinational companies (MNCs) do business around different geopolitical regions
and the exposure to different levels of political unrest and instability is the reason for that.
Political stability sets the stage for business functions, a partnership of long term investment, and
trade with certainty. This stability, on the other hand, means that businesses have the possibility
to predict regulatory initiatives and stable management policies. They are able to mitigate their
risks to a great extent. (Hartwell, 2018). On the other hand, the political instability can affect
business activities to a great extend especially it can lead to a number of financial losses, as well
as supply chain disruptions and reputational damage. Unpredictable swings in rule of the
government, disruption of political climate, or social commotions can put an MNE in a
vulnerable position by diminishing the foreign investment, credibility of its investors, and market
access. For instance, the political instability in a host country may but the company property,
industries nationalisation or arbitrary adverse companies'profitability and sustainability (Khattab
et al . , 2021). In addition, political risk has both a direct and an indirect impact on a business
enter-ing new markets, allocating capital, and organizational structures (Tao et al. , 2021). MNEs
have to evaluate and take action to mitigate technical hazards to secure their interests, preserve
business operations and to maintain competitiveness in the global market. Such a proactivity
involves risk assessment, planning scenarios, and stakeholder engagement, which are important
for preventing any kind of political insecurity (Alon & Herbert, 2019). Through applying the
political risk management into its strategic planning process, MNCs have chances to gain
3 | P a g e
resilience, adaptability and sustainability in a world of quickly interconnected and volatile global
world.
1.3 Types of political risks
Political risks that multinational enterprises (MNEs) encountered while doing business abroad,
was highlighted by Cuervo-Cazurra et al. (2020). These involve of governmental changes and
coups, unrest of civilians and public demonstrations, terrorist and security threats and regulatory
changes. Political changes, in a way, create the vacuum of unstable conditions, like regime
crashes or the change of ideas. Such events impossible to predict or the business is concerned to
or intends to put the investment in it will be on the leading edge. As such, management may
experience abrupt changes in leadership or policies, and thus those will affect regulatory
frameworks or trade policies that MNEs outcomes depend on (Bremmer, 2022). Most of ere
happens put the employees at a risk of their safety, and the security of company's asset may be
damaged, or the operations of the company maybe disturbed and the company's reputation as
well. Political turmoil or civil unrest in host countries can result in trade strikes, demonstrations,
or violent armed conflicts which further sabotage supply chains, hinder active production
processes, and consequently discredit MNEs' reputation. Firstly, terrorism and insecurity
vulnerabilities are also a risk that puts the personal safety of MNEs staff, facilities, and
infrastructure to risk that demands higher security arrangements and contingency planning from
the companies (Tao et. al. , 2021). Among the regulatory changes that MNEs may face are
alterations to trade policies, the establishment of foreign investment restrictions, or reduction in
protection of intellectual property rights, all of which impose extra requirements and might affect
access to the market (Hartwell, 2018). MNEs that operate overseas could experience the trade
agreements or the regulations changes of the government that might cause changes of
import/export tariffs or the foreign customs procedures. That may affect their competitiveness
4 | P a g e
and profitability. Also, a lack of clear standards or regulations related to the protection of
intellectual property rights can be considered as a barrier to innovation and technology transfer
activities by MNEs as they cannot utilize the intellectual assets of their companies in gaining of
competitive edge (Khattab et al. 2021).
1.4 Examples of political risks
There are many kinds of political risks that multinational enterprises (MNEs) encounters when
operating abroad, according to the analysis of Cuervo-Cazurra et al. (2020). Such events include
government upheavals and coups, civil disobedience and insurrections, terrorism and public
unrest as well as regulatory changes. Different post-election situations including rulers changes,
civil wars and other conflicts, or shift in political views, all can provoke distrust and the rise of
unpredictability, which makes the quest for planning and the search for investments more
difficult. Unlike the domestic markets, multinational enterprises have to deal with changes in the
leadership or policies which could result in alteration of the regulatory framework or trade
agreement, affecting the market conditions of these enterprises (Bremmer, 2022). Workers'
safety as well as buildings' security can be threatened by disruption of operations, terrorism,
protests and political turmoil (Stevens, Xie, & Peng. 2016). Political instability or social unrest
in host countries can provoke different types of controversial activities like labor strikes,
protests, violent conflicts which will ultimately disrupt supply chains, hinder normal production
activities and cause MNE’s reputation to suffer. the security threat and terrorism activities
generate dangers for their employees, sites, and infrastructures. This will contribute security
measures and contingency planning from MNEs (Tao et al. , 2021). the alterations in regulations,
such as the adjustment of trade policies, or the foreign investment limits, or the intellectual
property rights protection, might lead to the increase in burdens on the compliance and influence
the market access for MNEs (Hartwell, 2018). Alterations in tax regulation or trade arrangement
5 | P a g e
regulations could change import/export taxes, customs duties, and product standards that might
affect the competitiveness and profitability of MNEs participating in foreign markets. In addition
to this, the intellectual property rights protection uncertainties might be a huge barrier for the
innovation and technology transfer activities from MNEs, causing the problem that such
companies cannot utilize their intellectual assets and gain a competitive advantage (Khattab et
al. 2021).
2. Political Instability and Uncertainty
2.1 Government changes and coups
The governmental modifications and coups are the obstacles for multinational enterprises
(MNEs) operating in the affected countries, which was proved by Jiménez and Delgado-García
(2012). The political upheavals bring about a climate of uncertainty about the future policies,
regulations, and governance structures, thus causing a business environment to be very volatile.
MNEs usually face problems in their supply chains, decision-making processes, and long-term
planning due to the uncertainty of the transition to the government or a military regime
(Bremmer, 2022). In addition, changes of government and coups have broader impact, such as
the shifts in diplomatic relations and the alterations in international alliances, which can affect
the existing trade agreements and investment treaties (Dai & Tan, 2020). Therefore, MNEs are
now facing the complicated geopolitical issues and they are forced to rethink their strategic goals
in the context of the change of political leadership or foreign policies. In a real-world example,
MNEs may encounter operational problems like the interruption of production, distribution, and
logistics due to the political instability which is the outcome of government changes or
coups. Besides, the MNCs may face the problem of keeping and drawing the talent, as the
political uncertainty may make the skilled workers to look for the other places to work, thus, the
talent will be lost and the skills shortages will be created within the organization(Cuervo-Cazurra
6 | P a g e
et al. , 2020). In general, the change of government and coups have a great influence on MNEs
thus, the risk management should be the proactive step, which includes the scenario planning,
stakeholder engagement and the contingency measures to the potential adverse effects and the
protection of business interests in the unstable political environments.
2.2 Civil unrest and protests
Civil unrest and protests are one of the major types of political instability that can seriously
affect the functioning of the MNEs, as stated by Stevens, Xie, and Peng (2016). These
happenings normally originate from social frustrations, economic differences, or political
discontent . It mostly eventually lead to demonstrations, strikes, and mass mobilizations. The
civil unrest and protests can cause serious troubles to the transportation networks, damage the
supply chains and endanger the safety of the employees and assets, which will be a threat to the
business continuity and profitability of the companies ( Cuervo-Cazurra et al. , 2020). Besides,
the civil unrest and the protests can make the image and the reputation of the company to be
damaged, especially if the MNEs are seen as the ones who are responsible or the ones who do
not care about the local issues (Driffield et al. , 2019). Cases of companies being involved in
controversial activities or being accused of the exploitation of resources can make the public to
be against them and then they start a boycott or an activism against the company. Therefore,
MNEs have to take an active approach to the stakeholder management, the groups that they
interact with, like the local communities, the civil society, the government authorities, etc. , to
resolve the grievances, to promote the dialogue, and to create the sustainable relationships
(Ellstrand & Ricart, 2019). Besides, MNEs that are operating in countries with unstable political
situation should have strong risk management strategies in order to reduce the possible risks and
protect their interests. This may mean that one has to conduct a risk analysis, prepare the
contingency plans and enhance the security measures to protect the persons and the assets in the
7 | P a g e
volatile environments (Tao et al. , 2021). Besides, MNEs can use technology and data analytics
to observe social and political trends, predict possible disruptions, and change their operations
accordingly to stay strong and the most competitive in times of political uncertainty.
2.3 Terrorism and security threats
Terrorism and security threats are two of the major risks that multinational enterprises (MNEs)
face when operating in regions that are prone to terrorism and political instability, and this
problem is well-illustrated by Sottilotta (2015). These threats come in different ways, for
example, bombings, kidnappings, cyberattacks, and sabotage, that are the reasons of the fear and
the uncertainty. MNEs have to make sure that the safety and security of their people and assets
are the first thing they will consider when they are starting a new organization. They should use
all the tools that will help them to get through a crisis, a security measure, and the intelligence
gathering which will help them to prevent the terrorism (Kobrin, 2015). Besides, terrorism and
security threats have wider impacts for business functions apart from the immediate safety
problems. This implies that they may affect international travel and trade, being a cause of
logistical problems, the disruption of the supply chains, and the increase of the insurance costs
for MNEs (Leiblein & Miller, 2021). Increasing regulatory inspection and compliance rules may
also come up as a result of security threats, thus, more resources and work will be required to
meet the regulations requirements. The MNEs have to develop a risk management strategy that
covers physical security, cybersecurity, and the contingency planning as all the terrorism and
security threats are multi-faceted (Tao et al. , 2021). This involves the use of the tools like
access controls, surveillance systems, crisis response drills, and employee training programs to
increase the preparedness and resilience against the happenings of the future. Besides, working
with the local police, the law enforcement agencies, and the industry partners is a must to
8 | P a g e
exchange the information, to organize the response and to collectively decrease the risk that
terrorism and security threats bring to us in a collaborative way (Cuervo-Cazurra et al. , 2020).
2.4 Impact on business operations
Political instability has a lot of impacts on business operations which is a multi-dimensional
issue and it has a lot of effects for the MNEs, which is discussed by Jiménez and Delgado-García
(2012). The most significant impact is the interruption of supply chains, as political changes like
the government's change or civil unrest can cause logistic problems, delays in the transportation
and production schedules disruptions. The MNEs might have a hard time to get raw materials,
parts, or finished products, which will result in the inventory shortage, the production problem,
and the delay of the fulfillment (Bremmer, 2022). Political instability is one of the factors that
can affect the decision-making process and strategic planning by MNEs, which is the case in the
opinion of Dai and Tan (2020). The possible future policies, regulations, or governance
structures which are not certain will be a challenge for the risk averse environment, hence, the
investment decisions, expansion plans, or market entry strategies will be delayed. Firms may
choose to be patient at the time of decision-making, put off the capital investments or other
growth plans until the political environment is more friendly, which will restrict their growth
prospects and competitive edge (Cuervo-Cazurra et al. , 2020). Political instability may be a
factor that affects the MNEs' financial performance and profitability, since the exchange rates,
inflationary pressures, and the capital flight can destroy the revenues, raise the costs, and make
the investment returns impossible (Liu, Wohlgezwert, & Wydra, 2017). Currency devaluations,
on the other hand, may make the assets and investments of MNEs in foreign markets to be worth
less, thereby causing impairment charges and financial losses on balance sheets. Moreover, the
fact that the political risk perception of investors and creditors is increased will result in the
higher borrowing costs, restricted access to the capital markets and the increased financing
9 | P a g e
constraints for MNEs that operate in the politically unstable regions (Hartwell, 2018). Political
instability has serious impact on business operations and the most affected are supply chains,
decision-making processes and financial performance. MNEs should be obligated to take a
proactive stance on risk management which involves the scenario planning, stakeholder
engagement, and contingency plans, the purpose of which would be to lower the negative effects
of the political risks and protect the interests of the companies in the unstable environment.
3. Regulatory and Legal Risks
3.1 Changes in trade policies
The trade policies changes bring considerable regulatory challenges for the multinational
enterprises (MNEs), and this issue is discussed by Hartwell (2018) in detail. The changeable
nature of the trade agreements, together with the fluctuation of tariffs and import/export
regulations, can affect the operational landscape, market accessibility and the competitive
position of the MNEs in the global trade. For example, the one-sided raising of barriers and trade
restraining by countries in response to political disagreements or economic conflicts can cause
the supply chains to be disrupted and the market to be changed, thus affecting the bottom line
and the strategy of MNEs, as described by Tao et al. (2021). Moreover, the said policy changes
are the cause of the uncertainty of the future trade relationships and the market outline and thus
the strategic calculation for MNE, as mentioned by Ellstrand & Ricart (2019). Thus, MNEs are
in the position of being the ones who are facing the hard reality where the decision-making
processes are filled with the unknown and the risks. The above are the difficulties that MNEs
have to face, therefore, it is important for MNEs to keep an eye on the change of trade policies,
get involved in the stakeholders the regulations are shaped and, in a way, to vary their supply
chains to strengthen the resistance to the impacts of the changes in the international trade.
Through the implementation of proactive measures, MNEs will be able to increase their
10 | P a g e
adaptability and responsiveness, thus, they will be able to protect their interests in the midst of
the uncertainties and complexities of the global trade regulation area.
3.2 Restrictions on foreign investment
Limitations on foreign investments might be a legal problem to the multinational enterprises
(MNEs) who want to expand their operations into new markets, which is shown by Liu,
WohlgezThe host countries may regulate foreign ownership, equity participation, or investment
entry requirements in some specific industries that they consider to be sensitive or strategic.
These restrictions are the reasons why MNEs are not able to establish subsidiaries, joint ventures,
or wholly-owned enterprises, which limits their market access and growth opportunities(Khattab
et al. , 2021). Besides, limitations on foreign investment can render the regulatory compliance
and the legal obligations of MNEs operating in host countries (Witt & Lewin, 2007) uncertain.
MNEs are to do a proper due diligence, evaluate the regulatory risks, and get legal counsel to
help them to understand the foreign investment regulations and to ensure the compliance with the
local laws. Besides, the prohibition of foreign investments can be a threat to the MNEs in
obtaining the financing and the capital for their expansion (Bremmer, 2022). The restricted
access to foreign capital may become a barrier for the MNEs to raise funds from the international
financial institutions, venture capital, or private equity. This can hinder the MNEs' expansion
possibilities and the competitive advantage in the foreign markets, especially in the sectors that
need the heavy capital investment or the technological innovation (Cuervo-Cazurra et al. ,
2020). Moreover, the limits on foreign investment can worsen the geopolitical tensions and the
diplomatic issues between the home and the host countries (Dai & Tan, 2020). MNEs can get
involved in the conflict of political wars, becoming the targets of the investigations, the
regulation, or the expropriation of the assets in return for the foreign interference or the
economic exploitation. Thus, MNEs have to, first of all, analyse the geopolitical risks, secondly,
11 | P a g e
evaluate the political situation and, lastly, make a contingency plan to lower the effect of the
restrictions on foreign investment on their business operations and strategic objectives.
3.3 Intellectual property rights protection
The protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) is of great importance for MNEs to protect
their inventions, technologies, and trademarks in foreign markets, as Zhao, Luo, and Suh (2004)
have already stated. Inadequate protection mechanisms or the weak enforcement of IPR laws can
result in the MNEs being exposed to the risks of counterfeiting, piracy and the unauthorized use
of intellectual properties. This can decrease the market share, reduce competitiveness, and the
worth of the intangible assets for MNEs (Rodriguez et al. , 2006). Hence, the MNEs should
adopt the strong strategies for managing the intellectual property, for example, registering,
enforcing, and monitoring of the IPR infringements (Vaaler, 2008). The collaboration with local
authorities, engagement with the industry associations, and the investment in technology
solutions will increase the MNEs' ability to protect their intellectual property rights and also the
risks that they will have to face because of the inadequate IPR protection in the foreign markets.
Besides, the weakening of the intellectual property rights will be a obstacle to the innovation and
the MNEs' ability to use their investments in the R&D (Ellstrand & Ricart, 2019). Intellectual
property theft or imitation is a major fear of MNEs which discourages them from sharing
proprietary knowledge, entering into technology transfer agreements or setting up research
partnerships with local entities. This can interfere with the technology diffusion, knowledge
spillovers, and economic development of the host countries, thus, the potential benefits of FDI
for the local innovation ecosystems are not fully realized (Dai & Tan, 2020). Besides, the
negligence of the intellectual property rights protection can ruin the MNEs name and the
consumer trust (Stevens, Xie, & Peng, 2016). Counterfeit goods, pirated goods, or trademarks
used without permission can ruin the reputation of the brand, cause litigation and result in
12 | P a g e
financial losses for the MNEs. Hence, the action to protect the intellectual property rights is very
important for MNEs to keep their competitive advantage, protect the brand identity, and maintain
the long term profitability in the foreign markets (Cuervo-Cazurra et al. , 2020).
3.4 Compliance with local laws
Local laws are the main factor for multinational corporations (MNEs) to work in foreign markets
successfully, as pointed out by Hart (2018). Host countries are authorized to set specific rules on
many matters relating to the business operations, e. g. taxes, employment practices,
environmental standards, and corporate governance. Hence, MNEs are required to make the
necessary investment in the proper compliance programs, legal counsel, and internal controls in
order to follow the local laws and regulations (Cuervo-Cazurra et al. , 2020). It is a must to
follow the local laws in order to be trusted by the people in the host countries and to have a good
relationship with the stakeholders in host countries (Rodriguez et al. , 2006). Through the proof
of the acknowledgment of the local regulations and cultural norms, MNEs can boost their
reputation, establish goodwill and get the social license to operate. This helps in running of
businesses, the regulatory risks can be reduced and can be the basis for the future growth and the
sustainability of the business. Thus, MNEs should put their top on compliance as the main point
of their corporate governance and ethical responsibility (Jiménez & Delgado-García, 2012). The
author, Ellstrand and Ricart, (2019) proves that it is very important to comply with the local
regulations in the foreign markets to lower the legal risks and to ensure business continuity. The
violation of the laws like anti-corruption, data privacy, or consumer protection statutes is the
cause of the high costing of lawsuits, investigation, and the damage of the corporate reputation.
Thus, MNEs have to carry out the due diligence, risk assessments and training programs that
would make the employees know about their legal obligations and be able to create a culture of
compliance in the organization (Dai & Tan, 2020).
13 | P a g e
4. Economic and Financial Risks
4.1 Currency fluctuations and devaluations
Currency fluctuations and devaluations are the major economic and financial threats for
multinational enterprises (MNEs) operating across international markets, a problem that Leiblein
and Miller (2021) investigated extensively. Changes in the exchange rates can have a huge
influence on the profits, cash flows and competitiveness of MNEs on the international scale.
Besides, a situation when the host country's currency appreciates in relation to the MNEs' home
currency can lead to a decrease in the value of the foreign earnings when they are repatriated
back home, thus, affecting the financial performance of the MNEs, as the Dai & Tan (2020)
studying confirms. currency devaluations can be the reason for the increased costs of imported
inputs and raw materials, which in turn, will affect the production costs and pricing policies for
MNEs, an assertion that is supported by the studies of Stevens, Xie, & Peng (2016). Thus, MNEs
are forced to implement hedging mechanisms such as forward contracts or currency options to
protect themselves against the latent risks of currency fluctuations and strengthen themselves
against the unfavorable exchange rates movements, as Liu, Wohlgez**W**tzen, & Wydra
(2017) have suggested. So, to sum up, MNEs face a complex problem when dealing with
currency fluctuations and devaluation and therefore, they need to combine both of the strategies
to make the risks lower and to strengthen the resilience. The MNEs can tame the currency
volatility by the smart navigation of the currency dynamics and the implementation of the strong
hedging strategies, which will make their business strong, competitive and effective in the ever
changing currency market.
4.2 Expropriation and nationalization risks
Expropriation and nationalization are the most serious legal and financial challenges to the
multinational enterprises (MNEs) that are operating in foreign markets. Kobrin (2015) has
14 | P a g e
mentioned the above issue in detail. The ghosts of host governments seizing MNE's assets,
resources, or investments without paying enough for this shadow of political or economic
reasons are leading to a future of uncertainty and peril. These unilateral actions can lead to the
huge financial losses, which will be written off and will be the reasons for the problems between
MNEs and host governments, as Khattab et al. (2021) said. Additionally, the fear of
expropriation and nationalization worries not only the individual enterprises, but also the foreign
direct investment and the investor confidence in the host countries, which in turn will lead to the
stagnation of the economic development and the growth of the economies, this was show by
Cuervo-Cazurra et al. (2020). Therefore, MNEs have to adopt a complex method which includes
the thorough political risk analysis, the excellent stakeholder management strategies and the wise
division of investment portfolio in order to protect themselves from expropriation and
nationalization. Thus the danger of expropriation and nationalization is a kind of fire through
which the MNEs have to go, and this requires a strategic form of the actions that will protect
them from the possible risks. Through the careful analysis of geopolitical situations, the
promotion of the cooperation with the stakeholders, and the careful spreading of the investments
MNEs can build their resistance and cut the way to the threats from the expropriation and
nationalization, thus protecting their interests and the continuity of the operations in foreign
markets.
4.3 Inflation and economic instability
Macroeconomic risks for multinational enterprises (MNEs) are a problem in countries with
unstable economies, due to the fluctuations of inflation and economic instability, which is a
problem that has been mentioned by Hartwell (2018). High inflation rates can be one of the main
factors that will erode the purchasing power, raise the production costs and thus, the consumer
demand, which will be a general whoop to MNEs' revenue streams and profitability. Economic
15 | P a g e
instablity, for example, recessions, financial crises, and political turmoil, can be the cause of the
consumer spending, investment levels, and business confidence to fluctuation, which in turn may
have an impact on the MNEs' growth prospects and investment decisions (Driffield et al. ,
2019). Besides, inflation and economic instability are the factors that can weaken
macroeconomic stability, which results in currency depreciations, capital outflow, and balance of
payments crises (Liu, Wohlgezweit, & Wydra, 2017). Hence, MNEs should be able to adopt the
risk management strategies like, diversification of revenue streams, investment in the stable
assets, and monitoring of the economic indicators to cut the risks of inflation and economic
instability in the foreign markets. Besides that, inflation and economic instability can bring the
supply chains and the operational costs of MNEs (Bremmer, 2022) to the disruption level. The
instability in the prices of inputs, transportation costs, and labor expenses can bring the profit
margins down and the competitiveness of the business. Thus, corporations must adopt agile
supply chain management processes, enter into long-term agreements with suppliers and protect
themselves against currency risks to reduce the impacts of inflation and economic instability on
their operations (Cuervo-Cazurra et al. , 2020). Inflation and economic instability are two of the
factors which can influence consumer behavior and preferences and thus, the MNEs' marketing
strategies and product positioning can be affected (Hartwell, 2018). In times of economic
instability, consumers would rather buy the things they really need and would rather put off the
things that they want, and that's the reason why the shift in the demand patterns would happen.
Thus, MNEs should modify their marketing approaches, pricing policies, and product ranges to
reflect the changing consumer needs and market structures to remain competitive and achieve
growth even in the uncertain economic situations (Driffield et al. , 2019).
16 | P a g e
4.4 Restrictions on capital flows
Restrictions on capital flows are one of the most difficult challenges for MNEs which need to
allocate resources in a way that is efficient and at the same time would be able to manage
financial risks in the global markets. These restrictions, usually enforced by the governments to
regulate the currency exchange rates, to prevent capital flight, or to protect the local industries,
can force the MNEs to be unable to return the profits, to have financing or to transfer the funds
across the border (Witt & Lewin, 2007). The imposition of such restrictions can cause the cash
flow management to be disrupted, the investment decisions to be delayed and the transaction
costs to be increased for the MNEs which are operating in the countries that have such capital
controls. restrictions on capital flows can lead to the unpredictability of the investment
environment which, in turn, can affect the stability of the investment environment (Luiz et al. ,
2019). MNEs may have difficulties in undertaking the long-term investments, executing the
strategic acquisitions or the expansion strategies due to the capital mobility limitations. The
restrictions of capital formation, economic growth, and FDI inflows in countries with capital
regimes can be a reason of the impeding of the world economics. Capital flows limit can give
rise to financial market distortions and also make the allocation of resources inefficient (Khattab
et al. , 2021). Capital controls can lead to the creation of arbitrage opportunities, pushing the
people to do illegal financial activities and fostering the formation of underground currency
markets, thus the capital controls become the reason of the failure of the monetary policy
measures and financial stability. Thus, MNEs are obliged to deal with the regulation problems, to
evaluate the effect of capital controls on their activities, and to make plans for possible calamity
due to the capital flow limitations (Kobrin, 2015). Moreover, the limitations on capital flows can
further the liquidity risks and the credit limits for MNEs which are working in countries with the
limited access to the international capital markets (Bremmer, 2022). MNEs may face problems in
17 | P a g e
obtaining external financing, the internal foreign exchange risks and the refinancing of debt
obligations due to the limitations on the capital movements across the borders.
5. Socio-Cultural and Environmental Risks
5.1 Cultural differences and clashes
Cultural differences and the disputes brought up by them come as the main socio-cultural threats
to multinational enterprises (MNEs) when they are operating in different global markets, a point
which was stressed by Gilmore, Hinchliffe, and Crisostomo (2021). Differences in language,
customs, values, and societal norms are the factors that create the basis for misunderstanding,
miscommunication and intergroup conflicts between MNEs and the local stakeholders, which
include employees, customers, and communities. The inability to understand and respect the
cultural sensitivities leads to breakup of relationships, stopping the business negotiations and the
efficiency of the MNCs' operations, as Jiménez & Delgado-García (2012) have shown. Besides,
cultural clashes are a result of the multitude of ways in which they can be expressed, from the
realities of discrimination and prejudice to the phenomena of cultural imperialism, which is
explained by Jungmittag & Donges (2019). As a result, MNEs have to change their ways to
cultural sensitive methods across the areas such as human resource management, marketing
strategies and corporate social responsibility initiatives, which is what Kobrin (2015) is saying.
Through this kind of culturally sensitive approach, MNEs can not only go through the difficulties
of the different cultural landscapes but also establish the inclusiveness, foster the trust and build
the sustainable relation with the local stakeholders. In other words, the patchwork of cultural
differences and conflicts becomes an unavoidable dimension of the global business world, thus,
the MNEs need to adjust their operational framework to this challenging environment. In this
manner, MNEs can overcome cultural barriers, create synergies and promote a climate that is
suitable for the sustainable success and peaceful coexistence in the different global markets.
18 | P a g e
5.2 Labor issues and disputes
The labor issues and disputes are the main obstacles for the MNEs in the effective management
of the workforce and the operational continuity, the problem is stressed by Hartwell (2018). The
involved issues in this area include the following: wage disputes, working conditions, labor
rights, and collective bargaining agreements. The idea of possible strikes, protests, and union
activities, which creates a bad atmosphere for production, increases the operational costs and
puts the reputation of MNEs at risk, is the idea of labor unrest, as stated by Cuervo-Cazurra et
al. (2020). labor-related issues spread across the complicated structure of the supply chains of
MNEs and are reflected in their brand image, especially in the sectors that are labor intensive and
are under public scrutiny, as Driffield et al. (2019) found. Hence, MNEs are forced to adopt
proactive labor management practices, which include communication with labor unions and
workforce representatives and strict compliance with relevant labor laws and regulations in order
to deal with these complex issues. Through the promotion of a culture of dialogue and
cooperation, MNEs will be able to reduce the risks of labor issues and disputes, increase the
industrial harmony, and maintain the ethical and responsible corporate citizenship. In a nutshell,
the maze of labor issues and disputes is a crucibles where MNEs have to pass through expertly to
protect their operational resilience and reputation. Through the adoption of a holistic method of
labor management, which is based on transparency, fairness and compliance, MNEs can create
an atmosphere that is favorable for productive collaboration in order to reduce risks and ensure
economic growth in the complicated world of the global business.
5.3 Environmental regulations and sustainability
The environmental regulations and sustainability imperatives become the main issues of the
MNEs that are caused by the legal, reputational, and operational aspects that are analyzed by
Luiz, Ganson, and Wennmann (2019). The governments all over the world are introducing the
19 | P a g e
strict rules and regulations related to the environment and its protection like the environmental
standards, emission controls and the sustainability reports which are for the purpose of
combating climate change, stopping the pollution and the resource depletion. The fear of non-
compliance is almost always there, and it has the possibility of being fined, getting into legal
problems and losing money and reputation, as stated by Liu, Wohlgezused, & Wydra (2017).
Sustainability considerations are the main reasons that affect consumer preferences, investor
sentiments, and the whole supply chain, and thus, they are the main factors that will lead to the
change in the corporate ethos and strategic imperatives, this is supported by Jiménez & Delgado-
García (2012). The MNEs are therefore forced to change their operational strategies, by
introducing environmental sustainability in all the different areas of the business from the
strategies, product innovation, and the supply chain, as supported by Hartwell (2018). By making
environmental stewardship a part of their organizational ethos, MNEs can easily navigate the
regulatory maze and also get the advantages from the growing green economy and at the same
time they show their commitment to corporate responsibility and societal well-being.
Environmental regulations and sustainability issues are the crucible where MNEs must come
together the ethical and commercial imperatives to deal with the changing landscape of global
business efficiently. Through the incorporation of environmental sustainability into their way of
doing business, MNEs can overcome the regulatory barriers, strengthen the brand, and create a
sustainable path to lasting prosperity and societal stewardship in the time of the increasing
environmental problems.
5.4 Social responsibility and ethics
Social responsibility and ethical considerations are the basic principles that direct the behavior of
multinational enterprises (MNEs), the stimuli that build the system that can consist of moral
issues, stakeholder involvement and the sustainability of business. According to Crane, Matten,
20 | P a g e
and Spence (2019), MNEs are now being confronted with the complex game of inspecting the
relation between profit maximization and societal well-being, and at the same time dealing with
the challenge of balancing the divergent stakeholder interests and keeping to the ethical views.
Apart from the fact that there is a background of the increased public pressure and the changing
of the society, MNEs have to face the issue of redefining themselves and becoming more like a
good corporate citizen. To sum it up, the effort to be socially responsible and ethical goes beyond
the field of regulation and is the basis of the whole direction of the MNE towards ethical
decisions and value creation (Tashman & Raelin, 2013). Hence, MNEs have to actively involve
different stakeholders which are employees, communities, consumers, and civil society
organizations among other and this is done by getting them involved in a way that they will feel
that it is open and transparent and accountable for their actions and at the same time it will be
inclusive governance (Carroll & Shabana, 2010). Through the process of combining corporate
strategies with the needs and aspirations of society, MNEs will be able to build the long-lasting
trust, enable the brand to be robust, and in the same time, the growth will be sustainable while
the social problems like poverty or the environment will be solved. Furthermore, the social
responsibility and ethics, which are the ingredients of the flag MNEs operations, are the motors
for the innovation, differentiation and competitive advantage in the interconnected and value-
conscious marketplace (Porter & Kramer, 2011).
6. Risk Assessment and Mitigation
6.1 Political risk analysis techniques
Political risk analysis techniques are the core tools for multinational enterprises (MNEs) which
are the biggest players in the foreign market, and thus they are used for the identification,
assessment and mitigation of the political risks as pointed out by Alon and Herbert (2019). The
techniques range from the qualitative to the quantitative methods, each of them deals with the
21 | P a g e
variety of political risk in a unique way. Country risk assessments are the basis of political risk
analysis, meaning a complete study of political, economic, and social factors which will help in
the determination of the level of risk in the countries or regions which can give the MNEs the
idea of the current geopolitical situation and the related risks as does Ellstrand & Ricart (2019).
Scenario planning turns out to be a major tool, that lets MNEs visualize and get ready for various
contingencies by simulating hypothetical situations and evaluating their effect on business
processes, thus proactive risk mitigation strategies can be developed and introduced in case of
unforeseen political changes, as stated by Bremmer (2022). Besides, stakeholder analysis is a
powerful tool of political risk analysis, i. e. to analyze the different stakeholders, who are the real
players and what is their influence in the political field. Thus, MNEs can identify the
stakeholders and use this knowledge to design the strategy, which will be able to deal with the
stakeholder dynamics and establish the win-win relationships, by this way, they can
6.2 Risk management strategies
Risk management techniques are the key to MNEs to overcome political risks and protect their
interests in foreign markets, this was stated by Kobrin (2015). These strategies are the steps that
are taken before, during, or after the political risk to avoid it, reduce it or to transfer the political
risk exposure to other. The actions that are already being implemented to manage risk are, on the
one hand, the diversification of the markets portfolios, on the other hand, the joint ventures with
the local partners and, consequently, the localization of the operations in order to reduce the
dependence on a specific country or region (Jiménez & Delgado-García, 2012). Besides, MNEs
can get into the politics and make a case for their ideas, or even engage in diplomatic efforts to
influence policy-making and reduce the risks of regulations (Tao et al. , 2021).
22 | P a g e
6.3 Risk transfer and insurance
Risk transfer and insurance mechanisms are the important tools for the multinational enterprises
(MNEs) which are trying to protect the business from the political risks, a topic that is widely
investigated by Khattab et al. (2021). These mechanisms involve a variety of instruments ranging
from political risk insurance, guarantees to hedging to protect against potential financial losses
caused by political factors. Political risk insurance becomes the main shield for MNEs against a
variety of political dangers, such as expropriation, currency inconvertibility, and political
violence, as provided by Dai & Tan (2020). Regardless of whether they are bought from private
insurers or government agencies, these policies provide MNEs with a guarantee, protecting them
from the unfortunate financial consequences of unexpected political events and sovereign
decisions. Financial hedging instruments are a supplementary path for risk aversion, which
allows MNEs to manage the exposure to the exchange rate and currency fluctuations through the
use of derivatives such as currency options or forward contracts, as pointed out by Liu,
Wohlgezwer, & Wydra (2017). MNEs can use these instruments to protect themselves from the
currency risk, thus, they will be able to enhance their financial resilience and protect their
profitability in the global currency market which is unpredictable. In a nutshell, risk transfer and
insurance are the MNEs tools for coping with the political risks, giving them the financial
strength to go ahead with global expansion plans confidently and resiliently.
6.4 Contingency planning and crisis management
The contingency planning and crisis management are the essential elements of the multinational
enterprises' (MNEs) risk management strategies, which are the shields against the unpredictable
disruptions and the crises of the global business environment. Contingency planning is the
process of making the plans and protocols in advance considering the risks and contingencies
that might occur and how to deal with them before they become a crisis.. On the other hand,
23 | P a g e
crisis management is the synchronized and quick response to the emergent crises, which is
marked by the quick decision-making, the effective communication, and the decisive action to
control and lessen the effects of the disruptive events on MNEs' operations, stakeholders, and
reputation. Through the establishment of a well-defined crisis management framework that
includes the roles, communication channels and escalation procedures, MNEs can reduce the
problems, maintain the continuity and protect their interests in the time of crisis. The connection
of contingency planning and crisis management creates a culture of preparedness, agility, and
adaptability within MNEs, thus, MNEs are able to deal with the complexities of the global
business environment with confidence and resilience. Through the adoption of a proactive
approach to risk management and crisis preparedness, MNEs can reduce the vulnerabilities, take
advantage of the opportunities, and, thus, become more strong and resilient in the face of
adversity.
7. Case Studies and Examples
7.1 Successful navigation of political risks
A number of studies on the political risks management by MNEs demonstrate the effectiveness
of the risk management strategies in case of these risks, thus the example of the success of the
multinational enterprises. For instance, a study by Jiménez and Delgado-García (2012) analyzed
the proactive management of political risk by Spanish MNEs operating in many international
markets. These companies reduced political risks by forming alliances with local actors,
changing their business models according to the situation and being actively involved in the
government matters. Likewise, Gilmore, Hinchliffe, and Crisostomo (2021) showed how well
Indian banks could handle political risks while working in a country with unstable regulatory
environment. These banks established strong risk assessment systems, diversified their income
24 | P a g e
sources, and invested in the technology solutions to cope with the political uncertainties and still
to earn the profit.
7.2 Business failures due to political risks
The failures in business caused by political risks are the examples of the necessity for
multinational enterprises (MNEs) to develop strong risk management strategies. Hartwell (2018)
study proves the fact that the political unstability is the main factor that affects negatively the
revenue of MNEs in the transition economies. The research showed that the MNEs which lacked
the risk management systems were more prone to the political shocks and as a result they
suffered huge financial losses. A case study by Khattab et al. (2021) helps the reader to
understand the effects of the inadequate political risk mitigation strategies. The
research conducted on the downfall of a company was stuck in a country with a unstable
government system. The firm's failure to predict and deal with the political risks, in addition to
the high reliance on a single market and the lack of operational diversification, resulted in its
final exit from the market. The stories of caution stress the necessity of the effective risk
management in ensuring the MNEs are not harmed by the political uncertainties. By teaching
themselves to be proactive towards the detection of risks, the evaluation and the reduction, the
MNEs will be able to improve their resistance, to strengthen their financial bases and to
successfully pass through the unpredictable terrain of the global business environment with
confidence and agility. Hence, these fatal mistakes become the illustrative stories which
emphasize the importance of political risk management for MNEs as a part of their strategic
plans.
7.3 Lessons learned from case studies
Case studies are worth their weight in gold as they are the perfect source of secrets to be used by
multinational enterprises (MNEs) to learn about the subtleties of how to handle political risks.
25 | P a g e
Study of the smooth passing through political hazards by the Spanish MNEs, as presented by
Jiménez & Delgado-García (2012), shows the essential role of the stakeholders' active
involvement, the flexibility of the strategies, and the development of the varied markets. On the
other hand, the analysis of the failures arising from the political risks, as shown by Hartwell
(2018) and Khattab et al. (2021), will show the necessity for MNEs to create the risk assessment
framework, the contingency planning and the diversification plans. Case studies are excellent
examples of the changing of political risks, which makes MNEs to learn the culture of always
monitoring, adjusting and being agile to respond to the changes in the political situation and the
regulation, as stated by Gilmore, Hinchliffe, & Crisostomo (2021). Case studies are the sources
of the rich knowledge that managers of large multinationals need and this information will show
the way for them to manage the political risk and at the same time the advice of the failure of the
major managerial tasks. Through the lessons learned from these case studies, MNEs can increase
their capacity to withstand and if necessary, overcome various challenges, improve their strategy
building and strategic planning, and thus, they will be able to deal with the complexities of the
global business environment in a confident and foresighted manner.
7.4 Best practices for managing political risks
The best ways of managing political risks are by using a proactive and all-inclusive approach
that involves the risk assessment, mitigation, and contingency planning into the strategic
decision-making processes of multinational enterprises. To give an example, the study by
Bremmer (2022) demonstrates the significance of scenario planning, stakeholder analysis, and
political risk diagnosis in detecting the possible threats and prospects. Besides, the case studies
that succeed show the importance of the following three areas: strategic partnerships, local
knowledge, and the adaptive business models in the way of the political uncertainties (Jiménez &
Delgado-García, 2012; Gilmore, Hinchliffe, & Crisostomo, 2021). In addition, the best way of
26 | P a g e
managing risks is to have a complete view of what the risks are and their effects on the economy,
society and the environment (Hartwell, 2018). Thus, MNEs should embrace a multidisciplinary
perspective, involve different stakeholders, and use technology and data analysis to increase their
capability to foresee, evaluate, and react to political risks in a complex global environment.
8. Reference
Alon, I., & Herbert, T. T. (2019). A stranger in a strange land: Enhancing long-term competitive
advantage in an era of rising xenophobia. International Business Review, 28(1), 11-
20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.05.003
Bremmer, I. (2022). The new world of political risk management. Harvard Business Review,
100(3), 86-95.
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Newburry, W., & Park, S. H. (2020). Emerging market multinational
enterprises and international business research. Journal of International Business
Studies, 51(7), 1009-1031. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00342-y
Dai, L., & Tan, C. (2020). Political risk and international investment law. Singapore Journal of
Legal Studies, 2020(1), 164-184.
Driffield, N., Pereira, V., & Temouri, Y. (2019). Are multinational enterprises more resilient
than domestic firms to financial crises? Journal of International Business Studies,
50(9), 1491-1513. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00230-y
Ellstrand, A. E., & Ricart, J. E. (2019). International business and political risk: A critical
review. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1558-1574.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00236-6
27 | P a g e
Gilmore, E., Hinchliffe, D., & Crisostomo, A. (2021). Managing political risk: A case study of
the Indian banking sector. Thunderbird International Business Review, 63(3), 245-
258. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22164
Hartwell, C. A. (2018). The institutional and political determinants of firm profitability in
transition economies. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 103-119.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.002
Jiménez, A., & Delgado-García, J. B. (2012). Proactive management of political risk and
corporate performance: The case of Spanish multinational enterprises. International
Business Review, 21(6), 1029-1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.11.008
Jungmittag, A., & Donges, S. (2019). International business under adverse conditions: How
entrepreneurs in conflict-affected regions create value against all odds. Journal of
World Business, 54(5), 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.06.001
Khattab, U., Indjejikian, R., & El-Ghamry, E. (2021). Managing risk in a multinational
enterprise: The case of political risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101864.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101864
Kobrin, S. J. (2015). Managed political risk: A strategic perspective. Journal of International
Business Studies, 46(3), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.63
Leiblein, M. J., & Miller, D. J. (2021). The effects of political risk on corporate decisions: A
review of the literature. Journal of World Business, 56(3), 101197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101197
28 | P a g e
Liu, Y., Wohlgezogen, F., & Wydra, S. (2017). Physical and political risk factors and their
impact on non-resource FDI in developing countries. European Journal of
International Management, 11(5), 574-592.
https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2017.086543
Luiz, J. M., Ganson, B., & Wennmann, A. (2019). Reducing human and institutional
vulnerabilities to natural disasters and climate change. International Business
Review, 28(6), 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101592
Mitroff, I. I., Shrivastava, P., & Webb, G. G. (2021). Managing crises before they happen: What
every executive needs to know about crisis management. Oxford University Press.
Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D. S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational
enterprise: Politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of
International Business Studies, 37(6), 733-746.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400229
Sottilotta, C. E. (2015). Political risk: Concepts, definitions, challenges. LUISS School of
Government.
Stevens, C. E., Xie, E., & Peng, M. W. (2016). Toward a legitimacy-based view of political risk:
The case of Google and Yahoo in China. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 945-
963. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2369
Tao, J., Kim, S., Shin, J., Ruan, W., & Yang, C. (2021). The effect of political risk on
international business operations: A study of Taiwanese firms in China. Journal of
29 | P a g e
International Business Studies, 52(7), 1278-1303. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-
021-00420-y
Vaaler, P. M. (2008). How do MNCs vote in developing country elections? Academy of
Management Journal, 51(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.30709750
Witt, M. A., & Lewin, A. Y. (2007). Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to
home country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies,
38(4), 579-594. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400285
Yiu, D., & Makino, S. (2002). The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary:
An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13(6), 667-683.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.667.494
Zhao, H., Luo, Y., & Suh, T. (2004). Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry
mode choice: A meta-analytical review. Journal of International Business Studies,
35(6), 524-544. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400106
Zhu, H., Wang, P., & Huang, Y. (2016). Management of multimarket competition in home and
host countries: A study of multinational enterprises' subsidiary exit. Global Strategy
Journal, 6(4), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1143
Students also viewed