1
STRATEGIES FOR ACHIEVING SUSTAINABILITY OF SMALL BUSINESS
RESTAURAN
Section 1: Foundation of the Study
Background
Small businesses are important because they provide strength to local economies
(Ribeiro-Soriano, 2017). The major problem is that the failures of small businesses not
only exist in the United States, but worldwide. In the United States, small businesses
account for nearly 50% of businesses (U.S. Small Business Administration Office of
Advocacy, 2017). For over 30 years, small business success rates have been low (U.S.
Small Business Administration, 2017).
Very few small business restaurant owners are able to maintain business
operations past 5 years (Lofsten, 2016). Many small business restaurant owners lack
financial and leadership experience, which limits their capability to grow and maintain
profitability to sustain their businesses (Jogaratnam, 2018). Jogaratnam (2018) also
posited that some small business owners are not experienced in designing strategies to
market their product and services. Small business restaurant owners are in need of
effective strategies to maintain their operations beyond 5 years. Because of this widely
common problem, there is a need for research to understand why most small businesses
do not survive outside of the first 5 years of opening so that better strategies are provided
to increase sustainability.
2
Problem Statement
Small business owners in the United States create approximately 60% of the new
jobs in the entire nation each year but unfortunately, the success rate of small businesses
is low (U.S. Small Business Administration, 2017). Approximately 50% of small
businesses that start up do not last beyond the fifth year (Turner & Endres, 2017). The
general business problem is some small business restaurant owners do not know how to
sustain their businesses beyond 5 years after opening. The specific business problem is
some small business restaurant owners lack strategies to grow and maintain profitability
to sustain business beyond 5 years.
Purpose Statement
The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study is to explore strategies used by
some small business restaurant owners to grow and maintain profitability to sustain
business beyond 5 years. The targeted population consisted of five small business
restaurant owners located in the southeastern region of the United States, who have
grown and maintained profitability to sustain business beyond 5 years. The implication
for social change is small business restaurant owners can grow and maintain profitability
to sustain business beyond 5 years, provide more jobs for the community, and help
stimulate the local economy through revenue circulation. In addition, employees’
selfworth and self-dignity may increase through improved restaurant sustainability
because of new and continuing job and career opportunities.
3
Nature of the Study
There are three types of research approaches: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed
methods (Yin, 2018). Quantitative researchers measure relationships and correlations
between and among independent and dependent variables. Qualitative researchers explore
the experiences of those who have experienced the phenomenon (Park & Park, 2016).
When a researcher wants to explore a problem, the use of a qualitative approach is more
appropriate (Park & Park, 2016). Although the mixed method is a combination of the
qualitative and quantitative methods, measurements of the significance among variables
may not be necessary or for qualitative researchers (Almalki, 2016). To explore
successful business strategies for small business restaurant owners who have grown and
maintained profitability to sustain business beyond 5 years of opening, I did not need
quantitative measurement dynamics and therefore, I used the qualitative method.
Principal qualitative research designs include narrative, ethnography, case study,
and phenomenology. In a narrative design, researchers compile accounts of participants’
shared personal experiences but that is not the purpose of my study. In an ethnographic
design, researchers identify shared patterns or trends of a group’s culture (Muskat et al.,
2018). However, my intention was not to discover patterns among groups’ members.
Phenomenological design includes the experiences of subjects regarding the subject
phenomenon, including the subject’s emotional aspects (Gaete Celis, 2019). Case study is
the preferred design researchers employ when asking how or what questions. I chose to
use a case study design because I wanted to fully explore successful strategies sustaining
small restaurant businesses. More specifically, I chose a multiple case study design
4
instead of a single case study design to increase the credibility of my findings through the
account of multiple small business restaurant owners.
Research Question
What strategies do small business restaurant owners use to grow and maintain
profitability to sustain business beyond 5 years?
Interview Questions
1. What issue did you determine to be essential in your decision to open your
restaurant?
2. Based upon your experience, what traits and skills contributed to your success in
sustainability in the restaurant industry beyond 5 years?
3. What was the initial strategy that you selected to open this small business?
4. What adjustments/improvements did you make to your initial strategies for
surviving in the restaurant industry?
5. What specific strategies did you implement to create a competitive advantage
over the competition?
6. What steps did you take to control the quality of your goods and services?
7. What marketing strategies have you utilized to contribute to the continued success
of the business?
8. What critical strategic choices did you make to respond to changes in the small
business restaurant industry?
9. How did you focus on overcoming the key barriers that presented challenges to
sustainability?
5
10. What else can your share with me about the strategies, processes, and tools
you’ve used to achieve and sustain your businesses’ profitability beyond 5 years?
Conceptual Framework
Investigators in the 1940s used systems theory to study business sustainability.
Ludwig von Bertalanffy introduced the general systems theory in 1949 (vonBertalanffy,
1972). Being interdisciplinary, the systems theory pertains to an exploration of a
phenomenon as a whole (Tadros, 2020). To apply the systems theory, one must use
systems thinking, which is a type of qualitative approach that individuals employ to gain
more insight of the problem by considering multiple perspectives (McMahon & Patton,
2018). More specifically, systems thinking is when a person understands a structure
comprehensively and how changes in one area may affect the entire structure (Sardone,
2017). For example, in the restaurant industry, if a chef orders too much food, eventually
there will be waste and a cost increase. Similarly, if too little food is ordered, the
restaurant owner may reduce cash outlay but orders will go unfilled and customers may
become upset, which will decrease profits and could negatively affect business
sustainability. Chefs can use the tenets of the systems theory to correct these kinds of
errors.
Small business owners in any field must use different sustainable strategies than
strategies large corporation executives use (Zeuli & O'Shea, 2017). The original systems
theory specifically applied to large corporations with several departments. However,
recent additions to the theory are now relevant for small business owners. Unless small
business restaurant owners are experienced, there are several unpredictable challenges
6
they may face. The start-up phase of small restaurant businesses can be challenging so
owners should remain proactive and responsive so they can quickly adapt and as
necessary, revise their business strategies. Small business restaurant owners could benefit
from the systems theory to help prepare owners for identifying, understanding, and
addressing how their key business strategies and related processes need to be designed,
improved, and sustained.
Assumptions, Limitations, and Delimitations
Assumptions
Assumptions are accepted truths that have not been proven (Schoenung & Dikova,
2016). I assumed that all participants would answer the interview questions honestly. I
also assumed that all participants would answer each interview question with adequate
details. My third assumption was that each participant wants to contribute to this
research. Lastly, I assumed that participants would remain neutral (i.e., minimal bias)
when answering questions.
Limitation
A limitation is a potential weakness beyond the researcher’s control (Morgado et
al., 2017). The primary limitation of this study is the results are derived from the planned
5 subjects, which may reduce the scope of the generalization of the study findings. The
sample size will consist of a small number of small business restaurant owners located in
the southeastern region of the United States. The study results may vary with a larger
group of participants or in a different geography. Also, participant responses may vary
based geographical reference.
7
Delimitations
Delimitations refer to the factors that restrict the scope of the study (Marshall &
Rossman, 2016). The first delimitation of this study is that the focus is on small
restaurant businesses with less than 15 employees. The second delimitation is that
participants of this study are located in the southeastern region of the United States.
Operational Definitions
Business performance: Business performance refers to the actual business output
regarding financial performance, product performance, and shareholder return measured
against the intended business output (Foley & O’Connor, 2017).
Competitive advantage: Competitive advantage is a business attribute that
business owners use to outperform their competitors to increase business profitability
(Makhmoor & Rajesh, 2017).
Closed system (in systems theory): A closed system in the systems theory means
there is no interaction among any systems (VonBertalanffy, 1972).
Open system (in systems theory): An open system in the systems theory refers to
the way information is obtained from the operating environment to influence the business
system (VonBertalanffy, 1972).
Significance of the Study
Contribution to Business Practice
There is a vast number of published articles about competitive business practices
for small businesses. If there were a significant number of articles available that address
key specific challenges that small business restaurant owners undergo and important
8
management skills to maintain profitability, identifying, and exploring successful
sustainable business strategies would be a helpful contribution. By applying the systems
theory, business owners can improve sustainability rates by assessing each business
component and their interaction with other business components. Small business
restaurant owners may discover new strategies or confirm the success of existing
strategies regarding strategic planning, leadership, finance, innovation, and marketing
that will encourage long-term sustainability. Small business restaurant owners can elect to
make more effective and efficient business decisions.
Understanding the strategies that small business restaurant owners use to
successfully grow and maintain profitability to sustain business beyond 5 years could
help decrease the failure rate. The results of this qualitative study may help small business
restaurant owners in strategizing more efficiently and effectively remain profitable and
competitive. By implementing successful business strategies, small business restaurant
owners can make more effective and efficient business decisions.
Implications for Social Change
There are a couple of advantages to starting or having viable small businesses in
local communities (Ribeiro-Soriano, 2017). One major, positive result of beginning a
small business is that new jobs are created, which stimulates local economies. Small
business owners contribute to decreasing unemployment rates when they start their
businesses (Maller & Wapshott, 2017). Small business owners also play important roles
in supporting local communities by providing employment and tax revenues (Dahlstrom
& Talmage, 2018). The sustainability of small businesses can benefit local economies
9
through the circulation of money spent by consumers, whose spending could enhance the
quality of life and dignity of local citizens.
Review of Academic Literature
A literature review is an accumulation of synthesized knowledge from multiple
scholars (Onwuegbuzie and Weinbaum, 2017). Researchers construct literature reviews to
offer knowledge about the business problem and bridge gaps in literature relating to the
topic of the business problem (Wilson, 2017). The purpose of this review is to assess
published research on strategies for small business restaurants owners to grow and
maintain profitability to sustain business beyond 5 years.
In this review of literature, I researched articles regarding the sustainability of
small businesses. I analyzed peer-reviewed articles related to the systems theory, small
businesses, strategic planning, leadership styles and skills, innovation, business
marketing, business funding, and sustainable practices in businesses. I reviewed various
sources for this study, the sources are from an assortment of management and business,
economics, multidisciplinary social and human sciences databases, which includes
EBSCOhost, ProQuest, SAGE Premier, Emerald Management Journals, and government
websites. The keywords and phrases that I used to obtain the literature used in this study
included small business owners, small business success, small business sustainability,
sustainability strategies, leadership strategies, leadership styles, marketing strategies,
social media marketing, innovation, systems theory, contingency theory, grey systems
theory, complexity theory, profitability, small business funding, small business
restaurants, and small business finance. The search phrases that I selected for the
10
literature were helpful in identifying strategies for increasing sustainability in small
business restaurants beyond 5 years. The systems theory is the conceptual framework that
grounds the information in this literature review. By using the systems theory, small
business restaurant owners can enhance their levels of forecasting abilities and
interpretive power of typical situations that commonly occur.
I referenced 237 journal articles, books, and non-peer-reviewed government
sources in this literature review. Of the 237 references, 202 were published within 5 years
of my expected year of CAO approval. In Table 1 below, there is a detailed, numerical
summary of reference types.
Table 1
Details of References in the Study
Sources of Publication Older Within 5 years % within 5 Total of
than (2018-2022) years Publication
5
years
Peer-reviewed articles 30 192 86 222
Government 0 7 100 7
Books 5 2 0 7
Total 35 201 237
Systems Theory
Business owners can use systems theory for assistance in making the right
decisions in an ever-changing and unstable environment (Kurucz et al., 2017). The
systems theory originator, VonBertalanffy, defined a set of principles useful to
11
address complex issues in a holistic way (VonBertalanffy, 1972). The systems
theory was not originally designed for business use; VonBertalanffy developed the
systems theory by integrating biology, psychology, psychiatry, sociology in his
thesis (Drack, 2009). However, researchers found that the general systems theory
is broad and is applicable in many subject areas, including sustainable strategies
for small businesses (Colengelo, 2016). Small business restaurant owners may
benefit from using the systems theory to examine strategies to sustain operations
beyond 5 years.
The systems theory is based on a process of inputs and outputs where
information is obtained from the operating environment and feedback is produced
when applied to system processes (Sayin, 2016). In addition, VonBertalanffy
(1972) explained that the systems theory is comprised of open and closed systems.
An open system is where business owners influence their business processes by
using the information gathered from the operating environment (Hill
& Alexander, 2017). In a closed system, there are no interactions
(VonBertalanffy, 1972). Using an open system, small business restaurant owners maintain
business stability through feedback and change/improvement in business processes.
Flood and Carson (1993) applied systems theory to study the phenomena of
changing elements in an organization. Later, Sturmberg et al. (2014) pinpointed
components of the systems theory in a business environment that incorporated
system dynamics, development, transformation, and acclimatization. Based on the
research of Sturmberg et al., the systems theory is suitable for application in
12
creating sustainable strategies for the business environment. Instead of fixating on
single patterns, researchers identify interrelationships of people and components of
a system using the systems theory (Caws, 2015). Small business restaurant owners
can use the theory to understand the complexity of business systems and the
interconnections with external forces using an open system.
Caws (2015) postulated that business leaders could use the systems theory
to gain a better knowledge of intricate business systems and the relation of those
systems to environmental factors. Environmental factors are internal and external
components located within areas not limited to economic, political, and physical
environments. Business leaders should consider environmental factors such as
environmental policies and the availability of natural resources because they are
significant in business (Arieftiara et al., 2017). For instance, environmental
policies are laws that can affect the way a business operates, which may cause
business leaders to modify their procedures or equipment. While there may be
some costs associated with changing operational equipment, a more significant
cost may be the consequence of violating environmental policies. By employing
the systems theory, small business restaurant owners can make informed decisions
through visualizing environmental demands as an integrated whole with business
operations.
Small business owners in the restaurant industry face various types of
challenges such as market trends, financial resources, and competition. As a result,
owners usually modify their original plans of action to adjust to the changes.
13
Applying the systems theory to study complicated phenomena or challenges helps
in the understanding of situational issues in detail (Sturmberg et al., 2014).
Morgeson et al. (2015) agreed that researchers apply the systems theory to real-life
situations in the business world for simplification. When developing sustainability
strategies, the system theory is useful for small restaurant business owners because
the restaurant industry is complex and inconsistent. The systems theory is a guide
for business owners to discover principles that contribute to improving business
processes and performance.
Researchers and business owners use system theory as a framework for an
increased level of predictability when studying a phenomenon such as the
everchanging environment (Adams et al., 2014). VonBertalanffy (1972) proposed
that the systems theory is composed of patterns, relationships, holistic views, and
interactions. In a qualitative study, Shaked and Schechter (2016) proposed that those
who follow the systems theory should have a holistic view to understand situations
because many important business elements are interrelated. The start-up of small
businesses requires the integration of several processes and elements
(Snow, 2020).
Sometimes, the result of success or failure in small businesses is dependent
upon the adaptability of the owner to recognize and make changes as the business
continues operation (Dominici, 2017). Small business owners can use the systems
theory to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of their businesses based on goals
they set (Bridgen, 2017). By using the systems theory, small business owners can
14
more accurately understand internal and external business influences and their
effects (Block et al., 2018). Restaurant owners may improve sustainability by
using critical thinking capabilities, decision-making skills, and the holistic view
aspect of systems theory (Van Scheers, 2018). Small business restaurant owners
can effectively address complex environments and improve business sustainability
with the application of an open system in the systems theory (Block et al., 2018;
Van Scheers, 2018).
The systems theory is beneficial in aiding researchers to analyze and
describe how people work collectively to yield results (Sayin, 2016). According to
VonBertalanffy (1972), business leaders and researchers can adapt the systems
theory to explore correlations between phenomena in a business. Pouvreau (2014)
continued that when researchers holistically examine components, they will
discover systemic interconnections among several elements of which business
leaders must identify and govern. Through the understanding and implementation
of key constructs of the systems theory, business leaders view their business as an
entirety of interrelated parts because every component of the company is
interconnected (Broks, 2016). The systems theory is helpful for small restaurant
business owners to remain sustainable because leaders will have a better
understanding of how making changes in one area affects the rest.
Constructs of Systems Theory
Open system, holism, systems thinking, and interconnected components are
the key constructs of systems theory in which users find helpful in obtaining a
15
better understanding of the individual components of a system (Belinfanti & Stout,
2018; Yaşar, 2017). The status of a whole system is dependent on the status of each
component in the system; therefore, the components must align with the whole
system to properly function (Belinfanti & Stout, 2018). Restaurant owners should
strive to understand the constructs of systems theory to gain an in-depth
understanding of their business, improve sustainability, and maximize profit
effectively and efficiently (Yaşar, 2017). By using the systems theory, restaurant
business owners may be better equipped on how to employ sustainable business
strategies by using a holistic approach in the way they view their business and
understanding how each business component interacts with each other (Belinfanti
& Stout, 2018).
Open System
In an open system, a continuous exchange occurs between the business
process and business environment, which involves inputs and outputs (Hill &
Alexander, 2017). Business owners continuously obtain external business
information to input in business processes and take note of the output to adapt to
frequent changes (Howell, 2017). In a closed system, there is no exchange so
business owners are unable to utilize external elements to affect the business
process (Sayin, 2016). Using an open system, small business restaurant owners may
find solutions to continuous complex issues that involve multiple interrelated
components.
16
Holistic Approach
The concept of the holistic approach is the whole is greater than the sum of
its components. When systems theorists use a holistic approach to examine
systems, the research is comprehensive and exhaustive (Fiandaca et al., 2017).
Bridgen (2017) focused on the holistic approach of systems theory to pinpoint
issues regarding wholeness and behavior. Some small business restaurant owners
encounter several types of compartmentalized problems and fail to realize the
relationship between those issues (Cao, 2017). To increase business sustainability,
business owners must understand the interrelationships of business components
(Cao, 2017). Business owners who analyze system components using a holistic
approach can examine business issues more thoroughly (Breil, Ritchie, & Greer,
2017).
Systems Thinking
Business owners utilize enhanced business analysis and decision-making
skills by using systems thinking, which is a construct of systems theory
(Langstrand, 2016). Being able to identify patterns between the interactions of
business processes and challenges is useful, however, business owners must
address those challenges (Cao, 2017). Systems thinking is helpful for performing a
descriptive, analytical evaluation of business challenges and developing methods
to resolve those challenges with consideration of all business components
(Langstrand, 2016). Small business owners would benefit from using systems
17
thinking to concentrate on components of their business and determine the
possible effect on other business components (Fiore et al., 2018).
Interconnected Components
McMahon (2017) stated that the use of the systems theory is beneficial in
comprehending the connections among the components in a complex system.
Interconnected components are related elements in a system with individualized,
distinct functions (McMahon, 2017). The function of each business component is
makes up the overall business process (Yaşar, 2017). Some business processes are
unsuccessful because business owners fail to acknowledge interconnected
components in the business system (Cao, 2017). When all business components
are addressed as interconnected, the overall business process flows much smoother
and the quality of service increases. By viewing each business component as
interconnected opposed to being attentive to single aspects of the business,
business owners can design and implement more efficient strategies to promote
sustainability (Belinfanti & Stout, 2018).
Marketing, finance, and leadership may appear as three different functions
but business owners benefit from viewing each function using a holistic approach
and understanding that a change in one area affects the others. Insufficient finances
may decrease the ability to properly promote the business or hire skilled, qualified
leaders. For example, insufficient cash flow may result in necessary staple items
being out of stock (e.g., ketchup) or the menu being reduced (e.g., “temporary not
available” notices). Another example is hiring an unskilled leader, who may
18
negatively affect marketing and finance components because of their lack of
knowledge in those areas. While each function has a different objective, they are
all interconnected. Viewing each as components of a whole helps business owners
to create a process in which customer orders are fulfilled in a timely manner
(Yaşar, 2017).
Contrasting Theories
Researchers may view phenomena through several approaches. Before confirming
that the systems theory was suitable for this qualitative study, I explored several
alternative theories that might have been applicable in discovering sustainable strategies
for small restaurant businesses. Sayin (2016) maintained that the systems theory can be
perfect, imperfect, defective, or universal. Many of the sustainability theories that
surfaced from research literature contradicted the general systems theory. In the following
subsections, I will list contrasting theories and explanations for why they were not fit for
this study.
Contingency Theory
I considered using the contingency theory to ground this multiple case study
regarding sustainable strategies for small business restaurant owners. Small business
restaurant owners should demonstrate leadership qualities to sustain their business
beyond 5 years. The contingency theory was developed by Fiedler (1964) to bring
attention to the effectiveness of leadership based on personal and situational
characteristics. According to Fiedler, leadership style is fixed in the contingency theory.
Fiedler recommended that the best leadership style is dictated by the situation (Pratono,
19
2016). Using the contingency theory, the success of small businesses is based on the
method of the leader, as opposed to the leader themselves.
During the development of the contingency theory, Fiedler constructed the Least
Preferred Co-Worker Scale (LPC) to determine leadership style and task orientation.
However, the practicality of Fiedler’s contingency theory is questionable (Da Cruz et al.,
2011). While some small business owners are successful in using the contingency theory,
one concern is that the focus is primarily on leadership situations and not on the leader.
Therefore, the contingency theory was less applicable than the systems theory for my
purpose of exploring skills and strategies for small business restaurant owners to sustain
business beyond 5 years.
Grey Systems Theory
Deng developed the grey systems theory as a framework to assess issues and
bridge gaps between natural and social sciences (Liu et al., 2016). Similar to systems
theory, researchers can use the grey systems theory to comprehend systems, conduct an
analysis on relations, and create fuzzy models. Researchers who use the grey systems
theory approach problems with incomplete data (Liu et al., 2016). Business leaders may
use the systems theory to facilitate decision-making when in unpredictable environments
(Mierzwiak et al., 2019). The small business restaurant industry is a complex
environment with frequent, unpredictable changes, in which small business owners could
possibly address with the grey systems theory.
However, the grey systems theory may be flawed and inconsistent. Using the grey
systems theory, researchers address problems with modest samples and insufficient
20
information (Liu et al., 2016). Essentially, researchers must make assumptions based on
partial information using the grey systems theory. With sufficient information about the
problem, researchers can use the systems theory to properly identify problems and
understand patterns and relationships. The framework of the grey systems theory is a
concentration on inadequate and unavailable information, which is not suitable for this
study because restaurant data will be information will be available and sufficient.
Complexity Theory
Hartmanis and Stearns (1965) created the complexity theory and surmised that the
connections in system elements were due to growing patterns and links. Complexity
theory is a complex adaptive system with different behaviors (Axelrod, 1999).
Complexity theory closely resembles the systems theory in that researchers examine
patterns and relations of elements. Small business owners can use the complexity theory
to encourage growth and discover sustainability methods, such as networking,
relationship building, and accountability (Han & McKelvey, 2016).
Business environments frequently change due to a variety of reasons such as
customer preferences, socioeconomic and political issues, and rising competition
(Domanović & Janjić, 2018). To adapt to frequently changing business environments,
business owners may apply the complexity theory to identify business challenges. While
small business owners can use the complexity theory to identify business challenges in
unpredictable environments, the theory is less fitting than systems theory for this study.
Small business owners may be unable to view their business holistically when identifying
21
challenges and utilize critical systems thinking to project how changes in one area may
affect others.
Chaos Theory
As one of the founding fathers of the chaos theory, Lorenz (1963) employed the
butterfly effect to exhibit the theory. The butterfly effect is an occurrence that happens
when a minute change produces a largescale effect (Yas et al., 2017). Boudreau and Dube
(2017) summarized the chaos theory as a system that keeps stability through continuously
changing patterns that never go back to its initial state. Akmansoy and Kartal (2014)
explained that business leaders use the chaos theory to conjure an extraordinary change
within the business and for predictability.
McCarthy (2014) argued that the chaos theory is too delicate and challenging to
pinpoint the original state, which presents concerns for accuracy in predictability. The
small business restaurant industry is frequently changing so the use of chaos theory may
help to identify sustainable strategies for business owners. However, there are no control
measures in chaos theory (McCarthy, 2014). Because initial conditions are important,
using the chaos theory for achieving sustainability strategies for small business restaurant
owners is not advantageous as the industry must be at a fixed state to produce a certain
result.
Small Businesses
Explicitly defining the term small business is complicated because the definition
has changed over the past 50 years (Lampadarios, 2016). Small Business Administration
22
officials explicitly define small business according to size. The Small Business
Administration officials have listed the limitations of sizes for specific industries on its
website for clarification (Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 2018). All small
businesses have less than 500 employees (Small Business Administration, 2019). Small
businesses are put into classifications that consist of micro (less than 5 employees), small
(less than 50 employees), and medium (less than 500 employees) (Ellis, 2016a). A small
business is defined by the number of employees, asset value, and place of origination
(Dilger, 2017b).
Small business owners account for nearly half the business in the United States,
therefore, owners have a considerable influence on the advancement of local economies
(U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, 2017). There are several
owners who bring in employees from disproportional demographical backgrounds;
employees who are less likely to be hired by other companies (Reuben & Queen, 2015).
Small business owners take part in a critical job in shaping economies all over the world
(Quartey et al., 2017) More specifically, small business owners have the power to change
countries’ gross domestic product (GDP), revenue, and employment rates (Aleksandr et
al., 2016). Economies benefit from sustainable business strategies as well because
successful small business owners develop successful countries.
As the number of small business owners continues to rise, owners have varying
reasons for starting their own businesses. More than half of owners start their business for
personal flexibility reasons, 41% desire to add a new product to the market, and about
34% are inspired by the additional income (Hurst & Pugsley, 2011). Another reason that
23
business owners start their own companies is because they want to be in control of their
own financial destinies. Business ownership is seen as an accumulation of wealth because
of the value and continuous income (Poposka et al., 2016). Although each owner has
their own reason for start-up, there is no doubt that business owners create a specialized
freedom for themselves when starting a business.
The key to business sustainability is understanding the reasons why so many small
businesses fail. Joshi et al., (2016) discovered that one reason for failure was because of
the lack of management skills. Skill levels are important in entrepreneurship because they
are decision-making abilities that determine sustainability (Lee, 2016). Lobacz et al.,
(2016) presented another reason for small business failures, which explained that distrust
has a negative influence on performance.
Mueller and Shepherd (2016) noted that the scope of duties of a small business
leader might be so broad that the business owner may not be sufficiently skilled or
knowledgeable to carry out the entire range of administrative functions. Because the
success of new small businesses may be dependent on the skills and experience of the
business leader, there is an urgency for the leader to have the ability to perform a full
range of managerial functions (Visser et al., 2016). The ability to carry out the complete
range of administrative and managerial functions is essential to be successful. Ultimately,
small business owners must be skilled and experienced to achieve success.
The successes or failures of small businesses may depend on the flexibility of the
business leaders to make changes, based on feedback, as business leaders interact with
their environments (Jayawarna et al., 2013). General systems theory will be the lens that I
24
will use in this study to explore the strategies that small business restaurant owners used
to sustain their business. The holistic view of the general systems theory will be
appropriate for the study of business activities and strategies that small business
restaurant owners can use to sustain their business enterprises in their unique
environments.
The Restaurant Industry
In 2020, a worldwide pandemic occurred that affected all businesses, more
specifically small restaurant businesses. Small business restaurant owners across the
United States were ordered to shut down to prevent the spreading of COVID-19, an
infection caused by a new strain of coronavirus in which those infected have mild to
severe symptoms, including death (Centers for Disease Control and Infection, 2020).
However, there were some restaurants that were allowed to continue services such as fast-
food restaurants with drive-through services because there was little human-tohuman
contact. Many owners were unprepared for this type of situation because their business
model was based on dine-in service. As a result, there was a significant decrease in the
small restaurant business survival rate and a massive increase in the unemployment rate
(Jennings, 2020).
Some owners quickly adapted to the environmental change and implemented
curbside pick-up and delivery (Thorn, 2020). Curbside pick-up is a service where
customers go to the restaurant and an employee brings the order to their car. To prevent a
busy phone line when customers call to place orders, some small business owners
strategically created an application for online ordering. Another advantage of online
25
orders is that customers can see the full menu, pricing, and available pick-up times
through online ordering. Small business restaurants owners must continuously consider
the wavering demands and changes in the restaurant industry to survive.
Unfortunately, several small restaurant businesses did not reopen their doors
because the owners were unable to develop a strategic business plan to remain sustainable
(Canada Newswire, 2020). In addition, some small business owners may have had limited
resources and possibly were unknowledgeable about how to use available resources.
During this pandemic, small business restaurant owners may benefit from using the
systems theory to review each department and aspect of their business as the sum of a
whole. By using the systems theory, owners may have the ability to see how a change in
one area affects any other areas and strategically use forecasting to the make adjustments
to remain sustainable.
Strategic Business Planning
Strategic business planning is a notable management tool used in business to map
paths of success (Lidstone & MacLennan, 2017). Some business owners may use the
strategic business planning process to declare their objectives and discover ways to meet
their goals. While there are varying definitions of business planning, Lidstone and
MacLennan (2017) defined strategic planning as a process that includes placing goals and
outlining steps to meet to achieve those goals. According to Wolf and Floyd (2017), the
process of strategic business planning includes the analysis of current, available resources
and deciding on the best course of action to use them.
26
Strategic business planning also includes being diligent and focusing on the
strategy for a designated period of time for monitoring. Constant changes with
technology, politics, competition, and the economy should prompt business leaders to
continuously review their business plan and revise as necessary. For efficient strategic
planning, small business restaurant owners should consider several factors before
finalizing a business plan.
One leading cause of failure with small businesses is the lack of strategic
planning, which is usually because some small business owners lack experience in
strategic management and planning (Martinez et al., 2019; Turner & Endres, 2017).
Business owners tend to plan from their own experiences rather than formulizing a
documented plan (Popa et al., 2019). When planning strategically, business owners
should review past actions to forecast the future (Telesford & Strachan, 2017). In
addition, the strategic planning process should include the implementation of business
process changes and changes with contingency plans (Kuan et al., 2020).
When small business restaurant owners develop strategic plans, they are
practicing a sustainable process (Telesford & Strachan, 2017). Strategic plans are not only
essential for ensuring that current business processes align with the mission of the
business, but well-developed and implemented strategic plans are also important for
business longevity. By including sustainable practices such as innovation, marketing, and
financial strategies in the business plan, restaurant owners can foster business growth and
gain competitive advantages. Although business longevity is a goal that is not literally put
in the business mission, more thought should be put into ways to sustain business
27
practices. To remain sustainable, business leaders should develop strategic plans to
identify current business problems, goals, and future trends (Kearney, 2019). that impacts
small business sustainability and success (Telesford & Strachan, 2017).
Small business owners create business plans to encourage operational activities of
small businesses (Serven (2017). Strategic business planning is an analytical and
purposeful process so when a business strategy is implemented poorly, the chances of
success decrease for the business (Telesford & Strachan, 2017). Effective strategies are an
aid in achieving business objectives. Small business owners who adequately plan increase
their chances of success (Wolf & Floyd, 2017). Higher levels of business success and
increased sustainability are achievable through continuous evaluations of the business
environment, products, and services.
With strategic planning, small business owners can also utilize relevant tools to
identify and address business challenges through the use of a SWOT analysis. A SWOT
analysis is an assessment of business strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
(Guth & Asner-Self, 2017). Business owners conduct a SWOT analysis to outline the
strong points of their businesses, identify organizational limitations explore opportunities
for continued success, and detect potential threats. By using a SWOT analysis, small
business owners can develop strategic plans through an organized approach. However, a
SWOT analysis is a descriptive model so that the tool may be too vague and not inclusive
of all the variables that need to be considered (Bodi & Gotea, 2016).
Small business sustainability is essential to the economy for many reasons. For
example, successful small business owners are drivers of economic growth regarding
28
employment (Ribeiro-Soriano, 2017). Because the survival rate of small businesses is
50% in the first 5 years is low, small business owners would benefit from effective
business strategizing (Turner & Endres, 2017). Small business owners should precisely
define the parameters of success so they can create a feasible strategic plan. There are
various explanations for small business failures but owners should realize that a failure to
plan strategically may result in unsustainability. Therefore, small business restaurant
owners should strive to successfully implement strategic business plans to increase the
chances of sustainability. Therefore, small business restaurant owners should strive to
develop strategic business plans to increase sustainability.
Sustainable Strategies
In business, the purpose of sustainable strategies is to increase the longevity of
operational services (Kurucz et al., 2017). Some small business owners lose competitive
leverage because they lack certain resources and skills such as financial education,
innovativeness, leadership skills, and marketing knowledge (Ritz et al., 2019). By
adapting sustainable strategies (i.e., financial, leadership, innovative, marketing, etc.),
small business restaurant owners may efficiently increase profitability to sustain business
beyond 5 years.
Financial Strategies
Some small business owners encounter sustainability issues from the opening of
their business because of how they are funded (Elston et al., 2016). Limitations in
financing present several issues in different areas of small businesses. The most effective
method to select funding is to review the benefits and drawbacks for each option while
29
keeping the business model in mind (Michiels & Molly, 2017). Wong et al. (2018) agreed
that business leaders should seek financial options that include competitive advantages
that align with their goals. A few of the best funding options include those from family,
friends, and the owners themselves (Michiels & Molly, 2017). In general, loans from
family or friends are more pliable than those from financial institutions because of the
repayment terms (Faulkner, 2017).
Business owners should consider using bootstrapping to accelerate business
(Faulkner, 2017). Bootstrapping is a strategy that business owners use to quickly turn
over inventory and decrease the amount of funding required by a business (Khwaja,
2016). Through bootstrapping, business owners may be able to increase their
sustainability by creating a strong financial foundation. Equity financing is another
method of funding available for small business owners. Equity financing is a process in
which ownership interests are exchanged to receive an unsecured backing (Madura,
2015). There are business owners who favor equity financing because equity capital does
not usually require collateral risk or bear the burden of amortization payments with
interest expense (Buchanan, 2017). Another benefit for equity financing is that the
investors are skilled in business processes (Goh et al., 2017). When small business
owners create strategies for their finances, they are more apt to be successful, especially
through unpredictable times (Bellavitis et al., 2017).
Researchers have found that inadequate financial resources contribute to business
failures. When there is a lack of financial resources and sales revenue, business leaders
are at greater risk of failure (Dutta & Folta, 2016). Some business leaders downsize to
30
decrease labor cost and increase financial performance, which is usually not the best
option for small business owners because they have few employees. Small business
restaurant owners should understand the essentials of finance and possess the necessary
financial skills to evaluate their business’ profitability and ensure that debt management is
efficiently controlled.
Business leaders should have detailed knowledge of how to produce income and
keep their business (Dominici, 2017). Khan and Quaddos (2017) explained that the
reasons for some small business failures are because of business leaders that lack
financial skills and experience in creating strategies to increase profitability. An example
of an unskilled financial decision could include a business owner focusing on product
price without paying attention to other elements of financial importance such as the cost
of the product. There is a crucial need for small business owners to be skilled financially
so that they make effective decisions for the business. Effective financial management is
essential for business survivability; therefore, business owners should ensure they are
skilled in financial literacy (Khan and Quaddos, 2017).
When developing sustainability strategies, business owners must be aware of
economic and non-economic external factors. For example, economic factors include new
restaurant competitors, unemployment, or the amount of disposable income from
consumers. Non-economic factors could include road construction that limits customers’
access, supply shortages because of inclement weather, or the effects of a pandemic virus.
In business, financial stability occurs when small business owners consistently reorganize
financial resources in a timely manner to sustain in a durable, steady condition (Kremen
31
& Ohol, 2017). Owners can almost guarantee financial stability through adverse
environmental conditions by continuing to assess and plan for sufficient working capital
(Kremen & Ohol, 2017). Ample working capital aids in small business sustainability.
Businesses may benefit from building their models to be adjustable to changing factors
that are outside of the business and concentrate on continuous financial stability while
foregoing quick gains.
Of paramount importance, small business owners must create financial strategies
before opening because of the challenges of procuring funding, being that there is little to
no financial history, increased financial risk, and limited collateral. In both small
businesses and large organizations, internal and external financial resources are essential
(Rostamkalaei & Freel, 2017). Banks are more cautious to lend to small business owners
because of their lack of security and reliance on money from informal avenues such as
family and friends (Berger et al., 2014). According to the Security Exchange Commission
(2017), small business owners have a difficult time raising money because they are not
able to reach capital markets. Some small business owners use crowdfunding, investment
programs specifically for small businesses, and small business loans to collect funding
(SBA, 2017). Developing financial strategies before starting the business is essential to
avoid the potential barriers that small business owners typically face.
Innovation Strategies
Financial problems and business discontinuity may be the consequences of the
absence of innovative strategies (Atsan, 2016). Small business owners can strategically
use innovation to extend the business’s continuity and profitability (Reed, 2019). When
32
business owners focus on customer desires, they are likely to forge new markets and
create new products (Suraksa et al., 2016). Small business owners should use innovation
to obtain the competitive advantage and add value to the stakeholders (Kumaza, 2018).
Assembling innovative teams could be helpful for generating, selecting and implementing
ideas to gain the competitive advantage (Shin et al., 2016). Laviolette et al. (2016)
suggested that business owners reward those who developed creative ideas with items
such as monetary compensation, paid travel time to visit conferences, and promotion.
Small business owners are major innovation drivers and play a significant role in
developing new ideas and methods (Muenjohn & McMurray, 2016). There may be a
strong, positive link between innovation and business performance, which link could
increase business sustainability (Bortoluzzi et al, 2018). Integrating innovation in
business strategies is essential to small business sustainability. The integration process for
innovation involves two steps: induction and application (Moldogaziev & Resh, 2016).
Through induction, business owners persuade employees to be imaginative and original
when brainstorming about processes, products, and services. After reviewing the ideas
that employees have put together, the most creative ideas are applied in the business
strategy. Efficient, effective leadership and innovation in small businesses assist in
attaining sustainable progress and profitability (Muenjohn & McMurray, 2016).
Small business owners explore fresh and untested markets through the use of
innovation; however, innovation can be costly at times because of the call for
inventiveness (Manso, 2017). Business owners must take under advisement the cost of
possible failures and proof that innovation methods work (Manso, 2017). Katila et al.
33
(2017) determined that a reputable source of innovation is customers. Business owners
can solicit feedback from their customers through reviews and surveys to employ new
ideas, which are inexpensive.
To compensate for their small size and limited resources compared to large
businesses or franchises, small business owners should also use networking to boost
innovation (Lefebvre et al., 2014). Social media platforms also increase the origination of
innovative products, processes, and services because of the widely-diverse users.
Consumers use social media platforms to communicate to businesses about products and
services; positive and negative experiences; and technical issues (Valos et al., 2016).
Pavlov (2017) asserted that deciding on an innovation strategy is dependent on the goals
of the business, availability of time and money, environment, business culture, innovation
potential, and position the business leader takes in the market. While small businesses
may not compare in size and resources compared to major companies, owners still have
options available for less costly, yet effective innovation strategies.
Small business owners should take advantage of disruptive innovation because
change is always happening. Disruptive innovation is when new products, services, or
technologies interrupt and replace the former (Lofsten, 2016). Competition and constant
changes in technology threaten the performance of small businesses and their ability to
sustain (Levina, 2017). Nagy et al. (2016) stated that disruptive technology is a process
that occurs when new technology is constructed for new markets or thoroughly changes
conditions in pre-existing ones. Bohnsack and Pinkse (2017) added that radical changes
in business models from established models are driven by disruptive innovation.
34
Disruptive innovation is necessary when current technology becomes dated and newer
technology is better suited to satisfy the needs of consumers or when changes occur in the
business environment (Hazlett et al., 2016).
Hahn et al., (2014) found that use of disruptive innovation is not limited to any
area and is especially applicable in small businesses. Karimi and Walter (2016) posited
that business owners are more successful when disruptive innovation is integrated in the
business model. When implementing disruptive innovation, business owners should
examine the extent of disruptiveness to determine whether the change is different from
previous practices (Helkkula et al., 2017).
Sometimes, the result of success or failure in small businesses is dependent upon
the adaptability of the owner to recognize and make changes as the business continues
operation (Dominici, 2017). Business owners that take risks and integrate disruptive
innovation business models may see improved business performance (Batra et al., 2017).
Disruptive innovation is a significant factor of business sustainability that owners should
consider (Batra et al., 2017).
Leadership Strategies
One cause for failure with small businesses is the lack of leadership skills
(Amankwah-Amoah et al., 2018). Small business restaurant owners may have
management knowledge but fail to materialize their vision. Leadership and management
tenets are similar regarding the requisite engagement and involvement of others to
achieve a goal; however, both have specific functions in business (Oltean, 2016). Leaders
consider their influence on others and managers examine resources such as employees,
35
data, and other materials that get the day-to-day job done (Vecchiotti, 2018). Small
business restaurant owners may benefit in employing a leader with competent leadership
skills to assist in achieving sustainability beyond 5 years.
Behrendt (2017) and Vecchiotti (2018) stated that whether leadership can be
defined as a process, attribute, position, or skill depends on the leadership theory. There
are differing perspectives and ideas about leadership that includes the belief that
postulates leadership as a natural-born characteristic (Miguel, 2017). While there is no
clear-cut definition for leadership because experiences vary across a broad spectrum,
leadership is vital in the success of small businesses (Vecchiotti, 2018; Longenecker &
Insch, 2018). Postma and Zwart suggested that in order for small businesses to flourish in
intricate business environments, there is a need for direction. When selecting leadership
styles, small business owners should adopt a style that increases their likelihood of
sustainability. There are different styles of leadership that when executed properly will
add to the business; however, transformational leadership may yield more positive results
for small business restaurant owners in their attempt to retain employees and influence
them to commit to the business vision (Megheirkouni et al., 2018).
Among the vast of array of types of leaders are transformational leaders.
Transformational leaders instill motivation in their followers and earn their trust by
attending to their needs (Prasad & Junni, 2016). Prasad and Junni (2016) posited that
transformational leadership style is when there is a distinct focus on transforming and
inspiring. Transformational leaders are usually respected as role models as they give
followers a sense of purpose. The traits of transformational leaders include (a)
36
inspirational motivation, (b) influential, (c) strong consideration for others, and (d)
intellectually stimulating. In business, transformational leadership occurs when leaders
influence followers to achieve the business goals through inspirational motivation
(Baškarada et al., 2017).
In transformational leadership, the leader and follower equally work together for
the success of the business (Diggin et al., 2016). Transformational leaders aim their
attention at processes where the leader and follower are inspired to transform while
working to meet the shared vision (Pitoyo & Sawitri, 2016). Transformational leadership
may be viewed as an extension of transactional leadership, but this is not to say that one
is better than the other (Megheirkouni et al., 2018). Transactional leaders center their
actions around rewards, incentives, and punishments to get followers to achieve the goal
while transformational leaders provide inspiration (Baškarada et al., 2017). In
transactional leadership, leaders may not closely engage with their employees, which may
cause employees to feel undervalued. Transformational leaders work to identify needed
changes in the work process, observe and familiarize themselves with each employee, and
share their vision, which may be more effective in inspiring employees to achieve
sustainability goals.
Leadership skills are crucial for small business owners or the leader they
designate to oversee their business operations (Hockerts, 2017). Dillen et al. (2018)
pointed out that business owners with leadership skills increase sustainability because of
their strategic focus. One example is how well employees respond to those leadership’s
37
direction (Javad et al., 2017). Those in leadership positions directly affect business
performance, which may determine the length of business sustainability.
Leadership is more than leading a group; leadership is the art of inspiring and
motivating people to achieve the ultimate goal (Solomon et al., 2016). Leaders are crucial
decision-makers that use strategies to support business goals. Having leadership skills
will help business leaders to effectively communicate business goals and influence
employees to work harmoniously to achieve those goals. Small businesses should be
headed by leaders that continuously think analytically, examine internal and external
relationships, and promote sustainable and profitable business practices (Sarfraz, 2017).
If not running the business themselves, small business owners must select leaders that
share their vision of the company to increase the likelihood of success.
Small business restaurant owners who demonstrate strategic leadership traits may
have qualities that those who are unsuccessful lack. Some of those qualities include being
a visionary, prudent, open-minded, and an influencer. Bloom’s taxonomy clarifies
strategic leadership in a way that is simple to understand (Sarfraz, 2017). Bloom’s
taxonomy describes strategic leadership as thinking skills with the ability to comprehend
fact, ideas, and their links, apply and methods in various ways in current and past
situations, analyze and organize information into groups by identifying causes,
inferences, and evidence; assess and combine information in different ways by
propositioning substitute resolutions; creating a set of criteria certifying the work quality.
Successful business owners create innovative business strategies that include encourage
38
business expansion by looking past short-term gains and focusing on sustaining longterm
success (Schoemaker et al., 2018).
The successful application of leadership styles and use of leadership skills by
small business owners lead to increased sustainability through business performance and
competitiveness (Flanigan et al., 2017). A skillful leadership style is imperative to be
successful in increasing sustainability in small restaurant businesses. With the right type
of leadership, small business owners are able to create beneficial opportunities such as
cultivating internal and external relationships, implementing strategic ideas, and gaining
access to new markets.
Marketing Strategies
Marketing is essential because the process makes consumers aware of products
and services offered from the business. In the case of smaller businesses, marketing is
especially vital to inform consumers of the business’s existence (Resnick et al., 2016).
Small business restaurant owners attract new customers by utilizing marketing strategies
such as advertising, outreach, flyers, and viral marketing (Zheng, 2017). When
developing a marketing strategy, the ultimate goal of marketing is to turn prospective
consumers into recurring customers. Through the creation and execution of a competitive
marketing strategy, small business restaurant owners can enhance their sustainability in
complex business environments (Gerhardt et al., 2014).
The marketing strategies for small businesses are not similar to those in larger
companies (Miles et al., 2016). Small business owners usually have to select marketing
methods that are less costly because of limited financial resources. Patriotta and Hirsch
39
(2016) explained that the cost is expensive to survey new markets through trial and error.
Word of mouth is a strong, effective marketing tool that business leaders use for no cost
(Dadzie et al., 2017). According to Archer-Brown et al. (2017), word-of-mouth
communication takes place 75% of the time face-to-face, 15% of the time on the phone,
and 10% of the time online. To develop inexpensive ways to reach consumers, small
business restaurant owners may consider doing research on their target customers.
Short-and long-term marketing strategies should align with the financial strategic
business plan to attain profitability. Small business leaders should use cross-functional
engagement while focusing on inter/intraorganizational partnerships as a part of a
marketing strategy system (Whalen et al., 2016). A strategic marketing system includes a
needs analysis, innovation, positioning, plan development, implementation, evaluation,
and possible adjustments (Janicic & Jankovic, 2014). Strategic marketing is comprised of
approaches that help leaders develop and strengthen intended marketing plans. Marketing
is a valued contribution to customers and shareholders because of the development of
customer-oriented solutions (Rossiter, 2017). Without an appropriately designed
marketing strategy, small business owners are less likely to be competitive, which may
lead to early failure.
Marketing Mix
Small business restaurant owners must organize a plan to promote and sell their
products to be sustainable, competitive, and profitable (Lidstone, 2017). Marketing
specialists use marketing mixes to be efficient in creating differentiation strategies to
make sales (Rotileanu, 2020). Although the marketing mix continues to evolve and
40
include more Ps, the original marketing mix included 4 Ps: price, promotion, place, and
product (Borden, 1964). Small business restaurant owners may choose to include as many
Ps they feel are appropriate in their marketing mix, along with combining other marketing
strategies to achieve their sustainability goals. Some business owners in the food industry
use non-conventional marketing mixes for remaining sustainable and profitable
(Kazibudzki & Trojanowski, 2020). The marketing mix is an aid for small business
restaurant owners in advertising/showing products to consumers, communicating and
highlighting product elements, and demonstrating how the products will benefit the
customer (Al Badi, 2018). By organizing an effective marketing mix and efficient
promotion, small business owners can possibly increase their sustainability.
Utilizing the 4Ps marketing mix may not be advantageous for small business
restaurant owners in their attempt to maximize sustainability. Bahadir et al. (2015) tested
the 4Ps marketing mix in global markets to determine the effect on performance and
concluded that the 4Ps marketing mix is not fitting for all types of markets. Gordon et al.
(2013) acknowledged that the 4Ps of marketing needed to be enhanced for application in
different types of markets. Booms and Bitner (1981) created a service marketing model
that accommodates business leaders who offer do not physical products but a service
instead. The service marketing model is an expansion of the original 4 Ps marketing mix
and includes an additional three Ps: people, physical evidence, and process. The way that
small business owners utilize different types of variables in the marketing mix is a
contribution to small business sustainability (Al Badi, 2018).
41
Product. The business product may be the most important business component
because the actual product or service is what the customer purchases. Small business
owners should continuously strive to improve their products and/or services to remain
competitive (Liu et al., 2020). For example, a restaurant may be primarily known for their
pizzas. However, the restaurant owner may elect to expand their product mix and include
wings, salads, and alcoholic beverages. By diversifying the product mix, the restaurant
owner may increase revenue, reach new customers, and mitigate risks.
Price. Setting a price for the product is essential because that is how customers
gain access to purchase the product (Efanny et al., 2016). An attractive product price is a
contributing attribute in the food industry. If products are high-priced, the number of sales
may be affected negatively. Some pricing strategies that may benefit small business
restaurants are peak-load pricing and bundling (Heide, et al., 2008). Peak-load pricing is
when business leaders set a higher price during a specified time. An example of bundling
price strategizing is when the lamb chops are only available with two side dishes and a
glass of wine. If products are priced too low, the perception of the product’s quality may
be affected negatively. Ultimately, small business restaurant owners should strategically
price their products to achieve competitive advantage and to maintain sustainability.
Place. The place element in the marketing mix refers to the location of product
distribution (Macomber, 2012). The key to achieving success in the place element is to
focus on answering how customers will find and purchase products. Marketers should
strive to understand who their target audience is to effectively choose the most fitting
channel for product distribution. If customers have a difficult time when attempting to
42
purchase the product, they may not buy it at all (Van Meir, 2016). One of the most
important considerations for small business restaurant owners in the place element is
choosing a location with adequate seating to avoid unnecessary wait times (He et al.,
2019). Small business restaurant owners may also want to consider the distance between
the location and the majority of their target customers. Opening a restaurant in certain
areas may attract unintended customers, which could make sustainability difficult (Yang
et al., 2017). Small business restaurant owners should be critical in their evaluation of
ideal locations and distribution channels to ensure convenient access to products.
Promotion. The promotion process occurs when business owners inform
consumers about products and/or services that the company offers (Resnick et al., 2016).
When small business restaurant owners have a new or signature dish, product promotion
is the best way to inform consumers about the product. While the task seems simple,
small business owners should first determine the target audience. After determining the
audience, business owners should perform research on the best ways for engagement to
pursue efficient avenues to promote their business. One way to promote a small business
is to brand products. According to Bellin (2016), product branding is a tool that marketing
specialists use to attract potential consumers and differentiate products effectively.
Consider the Meat Lover’s pizza from Pizza Hut or The Meats pizza from Papa John’s.
Each of these pizzas has similar ingredients but the business leaders have given them
specific names, which is an aid in gaining customer attention. When promoting, each key
attribute regarding the product must be clearly emphasized and supported by the brand to
43
maximize the return on investment from marketing. The ultimate goal for the promotion
element is to show consumers why they need to buy a product and pay the listing price.
People. The people element of the marketing mix pertains to the employees of the
business (O'Neill, 2018). Having the right employees is an essential part of business.
Small business restaurant owners should strive to obtain employees that interact well with
customers. For example, waiters should be polite, quick, and knowledgeable of the menu.
Providing excellent customer service is a competitive advantage. Restaurants are part of
the hospitality industry and consumers expect employees to be hospitable. The behavior
of restaurant employees is a major component in attracting customers.
Processes. The process element involves the intangible activities that occur in the
business (Kwok et al., 2020). Business owners focus on how the activity is being
performed. For small business restaurant owners, these activities may include kitchen
procedures, handling reservations, dining room procedures, and cleaning. Each of these
activities impacts the experiences of potential customers. For instance, having
reservations is a benefit to most customers because they have a general idea of when they
will be seated. However, if customers are unable to reach an employee to make the
reservation or there are technical difficulties with the online process, business owners
may lose customers.
Physical Evidence. The physical evidence element of the marketing mix
represents tangible aspects of the business that potential customers may evaluate (O'Neill,
2018). Some tangible aspects that customers would evaluate in a small business
restaurant are the building, dining room, and kitchen. The physical evidence of a business
44
is important because the first impressions of potential customers are critical in sustaining
business. Customers are less likely to revisit a restaurant with broken tables, uneven
chairs, or inadequate lighting.
Branding Elements. Brand elements and marketing strategies must be carefully
selected because of the effect when building brand equity (Krautz, 2017). Strategically
developing a well-known brand boosts customer value perception, increases profitability,
and enhances the quality level of products and services (Eryigit, 2017). Sahin et al.
(2017) postulated that brand strategy is a marketing plan that fosters growth and strategic
brand development initiatives. When developing a brand strategy, small business
restaurant owners should ensure that their brand aligns with their purpose and that their
brand connects with the customer. Brand performance may be improved by understanding
the perception of a customer’s value and utilizing market activities (Cao et al., 2016). To
heighten brand advancement, small business restaurant owners should continuously
develop creative concepts.
Krautz (2017) interviewed restaurant leaders to pinpoint marketing strategies for
developing brand equity. Brand equity is the value of the brand name that comes from
consumers’ perception rather than the value of the product or service. Krautz (2017)
discovered that customers between the ages of 21-30 years old pay attention to what they
see, hear, and smell such as food, restaurant environment, and appearance of staff.
Customers between the ages of 31-40 years old place more value on service attitudes
because they want to have a pleasant experience. The results of the interview may be
beneficial in assisting small business restaurant owners to create, assess, and improve
45
brand equity. More specifically, small business restaurant owners may be able to use the
interview results to develop successful marketing strategies and enhance the customer
value of brand equity.
A business’ brand name is closely linked to the product/service’s quality and
profitability (Syed Alwi et al., 2016). Businesses such as Sony and Coca-Cola are
wellknown brand names that customers generally gravitate towards due to their strong
reputation (Whittler & Farris, 2017). Putting viral marketing into place may also
encourage brand growth initiatives. Pöyry et al. (2017) suggested that business leaders do
viral marketing in a way in which viewers can relate to the marketing strategy. Small
business owners should strategically select brand names for their business, products, and
services so that customers retain the name and/or relate to the service. Customers are
more likely to purchase from businesses when the brand value and equity are first-rate,
relatable, and popular (Wu et al., 2019). Therefore, by strategically selecting brand
names, small business owner improve sustainability by attracting and retaining
customers.
Mobile Technology Marketing
Small business owners should invest in mobile technology for marketing to reach
more potential customers and improve profitability. Mobile technology is an aid in
providing unique customer experiences and new communication channels for small
business restaurant owners (Pantanoa et al., 2017). In general, consumers have individual
needs and expect exclusive experiences. Ordering products from online has become a
common task but even more so during the COVID-19 pandemic (Browne & Redman,
46
2020). Customers can access the mobile site at any time and choose from a variety of
products without physically visiting the restaurant. In addition, customers avoid long wait
times at the restaurant through mobile technology (Alalwan, 2020). The integration of
mobile technology is an opportunity for small business leaders and marketing specialists
in growing their customer base and increasing profitability to sustain beyond 5 years.
Mobile marketing is a marketing technique that reaches consumers on their
mobile devices through mobile channels. Marketers use mobile channels such as text
messaging, social media, and push notifications based on the current location and
environment of the customer (Tong et al., 2020). Because of the increasing availability of
mobile devices such as cellphones and tablets, marketing specialists should strive to
understand how to reach mobile device users. With an understanding of mobile
technology, marketing specialists can target customers more effectively opposed to
traditional marketing techniques, which can be costly. By implementing mobile
marketing, small business owners may enhance the overall business performance and
improve business sustainability.
Social Media Marketing
Some business leaders struggle in connecting with customers, which affects
business sustainability (Oyza & Agwu, 2016). In those cases, business owners should
strive to find other avenues to reach customers such as using social media platforms.
According to Bandyopadhyay (2017), social media are website-based communications
tools that are designed for users to interact by sharing and consuming information.
Although business owners typically use social media to communicate to customers for
47
marketing purposes, the set of website-based communications tools is also useful for
increasing efficiency in business practices (Cole et al., 2017). By using social media
platforms, business owners can observe buying behaviors, increase visibility, and build
relationships with customers (Jovevski & Vasilevski, 2019). To remain sustainable and
increase competitiveness, small business owners should implement effective strategies to
include technological and trendy techniques such as social media marketing (Scalco,
2018).
Social media marketing has become a vital key to sustainability for small business
owners (Abrons, 2018). Small business owners use widely known social media platforms
such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter to interact with customers and remain
competitive with larger companies (Basri & Siam, 2017). Due to the high number of
social media users, owners are likely to have a greater reach in various geographical areas
as opposed to traditional marketing (Bandyopadhyay, 2017). The popularity of a business
is a positive contribution to business sustainability (Poddar & Agarwal, 2019). Arora et
al., (2019) posited that those who are well-known and use social media heavily have a
considerable influence on others. The use of social media is a sustainability strategy for
business owners in becoming popular, gaining access to new customers, and engaging
with customers more closely (Tripathi & Verma, 2018).
Transition
Section 1 began with a background of the business problem and continued with
the purpose of my qualitative, multiple case study. I selected a population for sampling
and listed interview questions that supported my central research question. In addition to
48
describing the conceptual framework and significance of my study, I provided a review of
literature for support. In Section 2, I will restate the study’s purpose and provided more
detailed information about the participants and research design and method. I will also
explain my data collection and organization techniques. I will complete Section 3 by
presenting my findings with recommendations.
49
Section 2: The Project
Purpose Statement
The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study is to explore strategies used by
some small business restaurant owners to grow and maintain profitability to sustain
business beyond 5 years. The targeted population consisted of five small business
restaurant owners located in the Southeastern region of the United States, who have
grown and maintained business profitability to sustain beyond 5 years. The implication
for social change is small business restaurant owners could potentially grow and maintain
profitability to sustain business beyond 5 years, provide more jobs for the community,
and help stimulate the local economy through revenue circulation. In addition,
employees’ self-worth and self-dignity may increase through improved restaurant
sustainability because of new and continuing job and career opportunities.
Role of the Researcher
The role of the researcher is to compile and explain the data that is acquired
(Ridder, 2017). In this qualitative study, I will be specific, detailed, and concise. In order
to be detailed and concise, researchers must be diligent during the data collection process
(Kumar & Cavallaro, 2017). As the researcher in seeking sustainable strategies for small
business restaurants, I selected the research methodology and design, theory, and
potential participants. Afterwards, I conducted interviews to collect, analyze, and evaluate
the data. Lastly, I presented the results of the research. As the primary data collection
instrument, I strictly adhered to ethical principles and guidelines to cover all subjects
during my research study.
50
In a qualitative case study, researchers have a vital task in collecting data through
people who is or have experienced a phenomenon. I followed my interview protocol (see
Appendix A) to ensure transparency and fairness for each interview participant. I used
member checking to alleviate any bias and increase my research credibility. I adhered to
ethical research standards that guard human subjects while conducting my study. Also, I
treated every participant involved in this study professionally. Recognizing and impeding
any possible bias is the role of the researcher when conducting any type of research
(Talbert, 2019). Prior to the study, I had no existing relationships with any of the research
participants and no ownership operational experience in the restaurant industry.
According to the Belmont Report on Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the
Protection of Human Subjects of Research (1979), there should be processes to mitigate
any possible ethical issues and protect the privacy of participants during the study. I
adhered to ethical research standards that guard human subjects while conducting my
study. Also, I treated every participant involved in this study professionally.
The Belmont Report is an outline of ethical principles such as respect,
beneficence, and fairness (Houghton et al., 2013). Houghton et al. (2013) stated that these
three principles, alongside a signed informed consent form, are essential for evaluation of
risks. The role of IRB is to act as an independent ethics committee and make certain that
the rights, safety, and well-being of human subjects are protected (Clapp et al., 2017). I
followed each principle to ensure the safety and contentment of every participant.
I have been working in customer service for over 20 years. I have experience in
working in the fast-food industry. My working experiences may potentially contribute to
51
small business restaurant owners because I have interacted with several customers
concerning their purchase decisions. Business operators faced with high competition and
limited operating margins gain competitive advantage through excellent customer service
(Bhat & Ahmad, 2018).
I understand there is potential bias that may stem from my personal views and will
use member checking to reduce it. Member checking is a technique used in qualitative
studies to improve accuracy, validity, and credibility. Because of the pliability and open
questions that are asked, semistructured interviews are one the most common types used
in qualitative research (Puyvelde, 2018). To mitigate bias, I used the interview protocol
(See Appendix A) to ask open-ended questions and allow participants to elaborate on
their experiences.
Participants
Researchers should check the eligibility of participants to ensure the sample of
participants are representative to the research for validity (Knechel, 2019). Knechel
(2019) also pointed out that researchers have the crucial task to select participants that
can potentially be instrumental in finding a solution to the problem at hand. The process
of recruiting includes actions such as advertising the need for participants, reviewing the
pool, and choosing the most qualified individuals (Marks et al., 2017). The participants
for this study were five small business restaurant owners located in the southeastern
region of the United States, who have grown and maintained profitability to sustain
business beyond 5 years.
52
When selecting participants, the eligibility criteria included small business
restaurant owners who sustained their businesses beyond 5 years. I used purposeful
sampling and the Google search engine to locate five small restaurant businesses in the
southeastern region of the United States. I inquired about the length of time the business
has been operational. I contacted and sent an invitation letter to participants that meet the
criteria.
Setting a positive tone and establishing rapport with participants is advantageous
for researchers because how the interview process begins has a significant impact on the
data collected (Hamilton & Finley, 2020). My initial contact to each small business
restaurant owner was via telephone, e-mail, or letters that include a brief summary of the
study. However, I maintained communication with each prospective participant via
telephone to establish a positive working relationship. Communicating to participants in
person or via telephone is more personable than other forms of communication
(Hershberger & Kavanaugh, 2017). I thoroughly explained the interview process and
immediately address any concerns in person and via telephone, which helped participants
to feel more comfortable and increase their willingness during the process. When sending
information to prospective participants, I included a request for willingness to participate.
The information on the consent form included detailed information about the research,
possible benefits and risks of study participation, and the requirements of participants
(Roulet et al., 2017).
53
Research Method
Researchers should select the most appropriate method and design that best
answers the problem they are exploring (Abutabenjeh & Jaradat, 2018). There are three
types of research methods: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (Strijker et al.,
2020). I selected a qualitative research method for my study so that I can conduct
semistructured interviews using open-ended questions.
When using a qualitative method, the researcher can find solutions to questions
and get an in-depth perspective by posing open-ended questions such as what, why, and
how regarding the phenomenon (McTat & Leffler, 2017; Misund, 2017). Researchers
conduct an in-depth analysis through observation and exploration by analyzing collected
data using a qualitative approach (Almalki, 2016). The goal of qualitative researchers is
to collect data from human subjects (Clarke & Veale, 2018). There are several options of
data collection methods that include interviews, focus groups, and observations (Aarsand
& Aarsand, 2019). Researchers use the quantitative method to test hypotheses (Crane et
al., 2017). In order to test a hypothesis, the quantitative researcher must collect numerical
data and utilize statistics to analyze the data (Crane et al., 2017). A quantitative research
method is not fitting for this study because I will not be testing a hypothesis or reporting
statistical data.
In a mixed-methods approach, researchers combine qualitative and quantitative
research methods to answer questions. However, a mixed-methods approach is not
applicable when seeking answers to questions that are specifically qualitative
54
(Schoonenboom & Johnson, 2017). The qualitative research method is more applicable
for collecting data to explore sustainable strategies for small business restaurant owners
located in the southeastern region of the United States.
Research Design
In qualitative research, there are several designs to choose from that includes: (a)
narrative research, (b) ethnography, (c) phenomenology, (d) case study (Petty et al.,
2012). In a narrative design, researchers develop stories from individuals who experience
the same phenomenon (Jones, 2016). In an ethnography design, researchers conduct a
study of individuals and collect data via interviews, observations, and the assessment of
influences on the culture (Sulkowski & Marjanski, 2018). My intent is not to understand
cultural influences. Phenomenological researchers seek to understand the experiences of
the subjects (Gaete Celis, 2019). When researchers use the phenomenological design,
they are attempting to determine the meaning of the occurrence (VanManen, 2017). Gaete
Celis (2019) posited phenomenological researchers focus upon how study subjects feel,
based upon their own experiences regarding a phenomenon. Therefore, a
phenomenological design is not fit for this study.
The research design that I chose to address my research question for this study is a
multiple case study design. A multiple case study design is a research method where
researchers examine multiple cases using several data collection methods (Haines, 2017).
Using interviews, researchers have the ability to gather in-depth information from each
case (Schmidt et al., 2018). McKim (2017) posited that a case study design is
advantageous because the data comes from individuals who have experienced and
55
overcome issues; this is the reason I am using a multiple case study. A multiple case study
design will be advantageous as I examine the experiences and views of small business
restaurant owners. A multiple case study design is more suitable for this study instead of a
single case study design to increase the credibility of my findings through the account of
multiple small business restaurant owners.
Population and Sampling
Researchers can use probability sampling and nonprobability sampling to identify
potential study subjects (Lucas, 2017). Probability sampling is when a researcher uses
random techniques to select samples (Robson & McCartan, 2016). Nonprobability
sampling is a method based on the discretion of the researcher where everyone in the
population does not have the same opportunity to be selected because the researcher
selects those who are more suitable for the study based on their qualities (Rafail, 2018). I
used the nonprobability sampling method so that I could increase the reliability for my
study. Purposive sampling is a method of nonprobability sampling, in which researchers
locate participants with knowledge about the research topic (But & Ap, 2017). I used a
purposive sampling method to explore strategies for small business restaurant owners to
grow and maintain profitability to sustain business beyond 5 years because the
participants will have essential knowledge about the research topic.
Selecting an appropriate population is critical for the reliability and validity of the
study (Runfola et al., 2017). For this study, I selected small business restaurant owners
who have the appropriate qualifications about the research topic, problem, and purpose.
The eligibility criteria for participants are: (a) has a small business restaurant, (b) at least
56
18 years of age, (c) established in the Southeastern region of the United States, (d) has
less than 50 employees, (e) and have grown and maintained profitability to sustain
business beyond 5 years.
Robson and McCartan (2016) suggested that qualitative researchers select a
sample size that is in alignment with the research question. According to Park and Park
(2016), the sample size is usually small in qualitative studies. The participants in this
qualitative, multiple case study were five small restaurant businesses in the Southeastern
region of the United States, who have grown and maintained profitability to sustain
business beyond 5 years. By interviewing five small business restaurant owners, I was
able to collect enough data to obtain detailed descriptions of common themes and patterns
among the participants.
If I am unable to collect enough data using five participants, I will conduct
additional interviews from additional participants until I reach data saturation. Data
saturation occurs when no new information emerges during the data collection process
(Hagaman & Wutich, 2017). Data saturation is confirmation of meticulous data collection
(Constantinou et al., 2017). I ensured data saturation is achieved when no new
information emerges among each participant that I interview.
Ethical Research
To assure ethical research, the protection of each participant is crucial (Roets,
2017). I completed the training for Protecting Human Subject Research Participants by
the National Institute of Health Training to ensure a low risk for ethical concerns from
each participant. I made clear that participation is strictly voluntary and participants can
57
decide to not take part in the interview at any time. Participants who decide not to
participate may contact me via telephone or email to withdraw from the study. I
confirmed the voluntary basis of subjects on the informed consent form (see Appendix
D). The information in the informed consent form included my contact information and
Walden’s University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) contact email and phone
numbers.
Researchers must be transparent about the research purpose and obtain consent
from each participant. Traceable information such as contact information should not be
visible on any documents (Hamilton & Stichler, 2015). An informed consent cannot be
obtained through influence of any kind and the form should be clear and concise for each
participant (Sil & Das, 2017). The purpose of the informed consent is to establish and
confirm the participants are knowledgeable of their purpose, the risks and benefits, their
rights, and the voluntary basis (Nusbaum et al., 2017). I informed each participant of the
subject and key elements of the research study. I also thoroughly explained the purpose of
involvement, risks and benefits, participant rights, and voluntary basis to each participant.
The researcher is responsible for keeping all data from participants confidential as
permitted by law (Ross et al., 2018). I will keep and protect all data from each participant
protected, which I procure from study subjects. To assure privacy and anonymity, I used
code names instead of participant names. Instead, I used generic names such as P1, P2,
and P3. All data collected from each participant will be password-protected and kept on
an external USB flash drive for 5 years, after which time I will delete all electronic
58
documents and shred any paper documents. By following this process, I will protect the
confidentiality of each participant.
Hamilton and Stichler (2015) mentioned that the approval process for data
collection may delay the researcher’s planned schedule but collecting data before
approval is a serious violation. My first goal was to comply with the ethical research
guidelines and receive approval from the Institutional Review Board for data collection
before working with potential participants. The participants did not receive any payments
or incentives for participating in the research study.
Data Collection Instruments
Yin (2017) opined that the primary data collection instrument is the researcher. I
was the primary data collection instrument for this qualitative, multiple case study. I
collected data from small business restaurant owners operating in the Southeastern region
of the United States, who have grown and maintained profitability to sustain business
beyond 5 years. To collect data for this research study, I used face-to-face or virtual
semistructured interviews and followed the established interview protocol (see Appendix
A). The interview protocol consisted of rules and methods for the interview process,
which was important for case study interviews (Yin, 2017). When conducting
semistructured interviews to study phenomena, Marshall and Rossman (2016) pointed out
that researchers ask participants open-ended questions. I asked open-ended questions (see
Appendix B) to each participant to retrieve qualitative data from small business restaurant
owners who have grown and maintained profitability to sustain business beyond 5 years.
59
I recorded the interview of each small business restaurant owner using a voice
recorder application on my laptop. My second recorder was a voice recorder application
on my cellular phone. I tested both devices using the application to verify they work
properly before each interview. The audio volume was critical for transcription so I
ensured that the quality was acceptable before each interview by completing a test
recording.
The most convenient time and location for each interview was confirmed either
through email or phone call. I blocked 60 minutes for each interview. The block included
time for unforeseen events such as tardiness, lengthy answers, and technical issues. Each
interviewee received a confirmation email or call to finalize the date, time, and location
of the interview. The data collection process took place at the interview location.
Researchers use member checking to increase study reliability and validity
(Varpio et al., 2017). Member checking is appropriate for the data collection in this study
because the process involves each participant reviewing their interview transcripts for
assurance of accuracy (Madill & Sullivan, 2017). I used member checking to edit any
possible misrepresentation of the interview and increase the validity and reliability of the
study.
I provided a copy of the interview transcription to each participant when
completed who was able to address any errors. I enhanced the reliability of the study
through my use of methodological triangulation using the interview data and company
documents, such as promotional materials, website information, and sales history.
60
Data Collection Technique
Participant observation, in-depth interviewing, and the analysis of audio-visual
materials are among the most popular of qualitative research methods (Marshall &
Rossman, 2016). Through semistructured interviews, research participants can express
themselves more candidly (Yin, 2017). I conducted semistructured interviews to explore
successful sustainable strategies used by small business restaurant owners. The face-
toface or virtual interviews will be conducted face-to-face or virtually include 10
openended questions to 5 small business restaurant owners who have successfully
managed to sustain their businesses beyond 5 years. Following the interview protocol
(see Appendix
A), I asked each interview question and as necessary, probed for more detailed responses.
I proceeded with each interview with transparency and open communication to establish a
trustworthy relationship with each participant (Croix et al., 2018). In addition to the
interviews, I collected information from each participants’ website and gathered other
data from public records and company artifacts.
Each small business owner received a copy of their signed consent form for
review before the interview began. I audio-recorded each interview in a discreet location
where only the participant and myself are present. I allotted 60 minutes for each
interview. At the beginning of each interview, I started by asking general questions to get
background, education, and specialty information. I observed all interview details such as
body language, voice inflections, long pauses, and other nonverbal signals, which is an
advantage of face-to-face interviews. By conducting interviews, I was able to ask probing
61
questions and immediately clarify responses to gain a deeper understanding with my
subjects. Another advantage of face-to-face interviews is that interviewers have control
over the interview and keep participants focused on the subject (Mu, 2007).
A disadvantage of face-to-face interviews is the travel cost and time to each
participant (Onwuegbuzie et al., 2011). The transcription process could be tedious
because researchers collect large volumes of data when conducting interviews (Kern,
2016). According to Kern (2016), manual data entry is another disadvantage of
interviews because this method can be time-consuming and prolong the data analysis
process.
For reliability and validity, I used member checking. At the conclusion of each
interview, I transcribed the data that I collected from each participant and provided them
with a copy for their review. By using member checking each participant can review the
accuracy of the interpretation of their responses (Bradshaw et al., 2017). I am the only
individual that will have access to the interview data and will work to make sure that the
information remains secure for 5 years. After the 5-year period, I will delete all electronic
documents and shred any paper documents.
Data Organization Technique
Researchers label each participant’s interview as a data organization technique
(Bishop & Kuula-Luumi, 2017). To specify each participant using discretion, I labeled
each small business restaurant owner as the following: P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5. Each
participant’s file included a transcription of the interview, the agreement documents, and
all company data collected for the study. I wrote down my observations using a reflective
62
journal immediately after each interview so that I can accurately reflect on each interview
experience. Through reflective journaling, researchers are able to examine and analyze
their experiences (Rodriguez, 2017). I transcribed each participant interview and filed
each interview under their respective labels to ensure a precise organization of
participants’ statements and identify common themes. NVivo is a data analysis software
program qualitative researchers use to compare interview data and draw resulting themes
(Paulus et al., 2017). I used NVivo to input interview results and converted the data into
codes for organization before beginning the data analysis process.
Hammad (2016) maintained that password-protected files are not visible when
conducting a physical examination. Therefore, the data I collect will be safely stored in
my desk on a USB drive that is password-protected. I will be the only individual with
access to the data. After 5 years, I will delete all electronic documents and shred any
paper documents that I collected from each participant.
Data Analysis
In qualitative, multiple case studies, the data analysis process involves (a)
compiling data, (b) organizing and mapping, (c) identifying themes, (d) comparing
literature, and (e) drawing conclusions (Yin, 2017). I began the data analysis process by
compiling all data from participant interview responses. Interview data should be
transcribed verbatim and while the information is fresh (Rubin & Rubin, 2012). I
transcribed the interview data within 2 days from the interview completion date.
Although there are other qualitative data analysis software programs, most qualitative
63
researchers use NVivo for their studies (Woods et al., 2016). I used NVivo to organize
and map my data collection.
Researchers must remain unbiased and put aside all pre-judgments in the data
analysis process to effectively consider all possible meanings through analysis of
statements into themes (Clark & Vealé, 2018). I remained open-minded and ensured to
use member checking for all collected data during the analysis process. To code the
interview data, notes, and company documents, I used the NVivo 12 qualitative analysis
software program. Next, I created reports to improve the quality of the data for the
research study. There are four ways data can be triangulated: (a) investigator
triangulation, (b) methodological triangulation, (c) data triangulation, (d) theory
triangulation (Fusch et al., 2018). Case study researchers use methodological
triangulation to interpret and analyze data (Yin, 2018). I used methodological
triangulation for the interview data using each company’s information sources and
company documents, such as promotional materials, website information, and sales
history to establish validity during the data analysis process. By combining
methodological triangulation and the use of NVivo 12, I identified and classified the data
into themes.
I compared the data from each semistructured interview and company documents,
including those found on each small business owner’s website. From the sources of data,
I explored recurring themes for identifying strategies for achieving sustainability in small
business restaurants in the Southeastern region of the United States. I classified and coded
all themes that I obtained from interview data, notes, and company documents. I
64
maintained the use of the systems theory as the conceptual framework, which grounded
this study while correlating key themes with existing literature to develop a conclusion.
At the conclusion of this analysis, I determined if the themes were consistent with
previous case studies.
Reliability and Validity
Two similar terms that describe the accuracy and rigor of research are reliability
and validity, whereas reliability refers to consistency and validity refers to the value of
truth (Olsen et al., 2016; Maher et al., 2018). Including participants with knowledge of
the study subject will increase the reliability and validity of the research study (Yin,
2017). Macduff et al., (2016) listed the commonly used criteria to evaluate the precision
of qualitative research as dependability, credibility, confirmability, and transferability.
Reliability
In qualitative research, reliability refers to the dependability of the data in terms of
its consistency and trustworthiness (Maher et al., 2018). The quality of a qualitative
research study’s findings should be dependable, which means that the research findings
should be consistent if replicated under similar conditions. In research, dependability is
vital when considering the trustworthiness of the findings.
For dependability in this research study, I audio-recorded and took notes during
each interview. Next, I transcribed each interview and used the NVivo 12 software to
analyze my collected data. To maintain reliability and dependability, the basis of my data
analysis came from interview responses, my personal observations, and written notes
using the same research and interview protocol (see Appendix A) for each participant.
65
Researchers use member checking as a research assistant tool in retaining the reliability
and dependability of studies (Chiumento et al., 2017). I used member checking to ensure
that I transcribe an accurate interpretation of interview responses. Triangulation is another
technique to increase reliability (Robin & Eisen, 2017). Turner et al. (2017) opined that
triangulation occurs when researchers use multiple sources of data to support the
interview data to verify the trustworthiness of the research conclusions. I used
methodological triangulation to compare my data sources including interview data and
data from company documents and company websites.
Validity
Validity is crucial for confirming the quality of the research study. In research,
validity is a combination of the accuracy and truthfulness of collected data, analysis, and
study findings (Dennis, 2018). Similar to reliability, researchers use triangulation for
interview data to provide validity (Kern, 2016). In addition to triangulation, I provided
validity through the use of member checking and data saturation.
Credibility
To evaluate the accuracy of data that is collected, researchers ensure credibility
when examining the information (Bradshaw et al., 2017). Through credibility, researchers
can ensure that the study’s findings are truthful and reasonable (Turner et al., 2017). To
ensure credibility that each interview transcription is a true reflection of each participant’s
response, I used member checking by disseminating the interview transcription to each
participant for their personal, thorough review. Subjects will then inform me of any
necessary corrections. This member checking process enhanced study validity. In
66
addition, I used methodical triangulation to focus on all data from the interview and
company documents to avoid biases.
Confirmability
Nowell et al., (2017) stated that confirmability refers to a process where the
research findings can be confirmed by others. In qualitative studies, confirmability
involves the objectivity and accuracy of data that is absent of researcher bias (Nowell et
al., 2017). The purpose of this study was to provide adequate, unbiased information,
which accurately reflects participants’ views. I used member checking, follow-up
interviews, NVivo data analysis software, and triangulation to enhance confirmability.
Transferability
Transferability is the extent to which the research findings are applicable to other
content (Nowell et al., 2017). For transferability, I methodically documented the research
study method, design, and geographical limit. I also provided a detailed description of the
techniques of data collection to equip readers with the opportunity to transfer the study
findings to other settings. Lastly, I provided substantial evidence so that the research
findings were applicable to different situations and populations.
Data Saturation
Although achieving data saturation can be tedious, continuously gathering data
until there is no new information is vital in research studies (Hagaman & Wutich, 2017).
Hennink et al. (2017) stated that data saturation is achieved when no new data are
available to duplicate the study. To ensure I achieve data saturation, I continued to
67
interview participants until their responses were repetitive or no new information was
available.
Transition and Summary
Section 2 contains the purpose of the study, details the role of the researcher, and a
description of the research participants. I outlined the rationale for selecting a qualitative,
multiple case study as the most appropriate research method and design. Following is a
description of my population and sampling technique and a presentation of the data
collection and analysis techniques. At the conclusion of Section 2, I identified how I
would ensure reliability and validity of the study.
In Section 3, I will restate the study’s purpose and present findings of the study.
Section 3 will also include a discussion on how to apply the study’s findings in business
practices, implications for social change, and recommendations for action. I will end
Section 3 by reflecting on my experience throughout the study process and offering a
conclusion.
Section 3: Application to Professional Practice and Implications for Change
Introduction
The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore strategies used
by some small business restaurant owners to grow and maintain profitability to sustain
business beyond 5 years. The targeted population consisted of five small business
restaurant owners located in the Southeastern region of the United States, who have
grown and maintained business profitability to sustain beyond 5 years. I used
68
methodological triangulation after collecting data and identifying three emerging themes.
The strategies that participants use to grow and maintain business profitability to sustain
beyond 5 years aligned with VonBertalanffy’s system theory. The recurring themes that I
identified among the small business restaurant owners that participated in this study are:
(a) providing an excellent and non-substitutable customer service experience, (b)
capitalizing on using social media effectively, and (c) accentuating the competitive
advantages of the restaurant location.
Presentation of the Findings
The research question used to guide this study was: What strategies do small
business restaurant owners use to grow and maintain profitability to sustain business
beyond 5 years? I conducted semistructured interviews using the interview protocol
(Appendix) with five small business restaurant owners in the southeastern region of the
United States. Each participant answered 10 open-ended questions about strategies. After
the interviews, I transcribed the audio recordings and provided each transcript to the
corresponding participant for member checking. I used NVivo 12 to organize the
collected data and create nodes to identify recurring themes: (a) providing an excellent
and non-substitutable customer service experience, (b) capitalizing on using social media
effectively, and (c) accentuating the competitive advantages of the restaurant location.
Emerging Theme 1: Providing an Excellent and Non-substitutable Customer
Service Experience
69
According to Zaefarian et al. (2017), customers become loyal and repeat buyers
from quality customer service. Each participant spoke thoroughly about providing quality
customer service and how by doing so contributes to their sustainability. By providing
excellent customer service, small business owners can compete with major businesses
because customers enjoy good service (Zaefarian et al., 2017). Small business owners
should strive earnestly to build customer service skills.
P1 discussed how during the pandemic that customers were not upset with her
because of the supply shortages. P1 stated: “This was confirmation that I’ve been
providing the right type of customer service.” P1 was able to maneuver through the
challenges of the pandemic more smoothly as a result of her history of providing good
customer service.
P2 expressed the critical need for small business owners to continuously provide
good customer service. P2 stated: “In my experience, new business owners provide
excellent customer service in the beginning but stop much sooner than later.” P2 also
stated: “Providing excellent customer service should be a continuous strategy for all small
businesses to remain competitive.” P4 mentioned the importance of all employees
providing good customer service. He stated: “If I’m the only one upholding my vision
and mission, customers will only want to interact with me. And that would become
extremely stressful.” P3 voiced: “I believe that customer service is the differentiation
technique that sets me apart from my competitors and some large businesses”. The
70
participants of the study realized the value of customer service and use the service as a
competitive strategy.
Building relationships helps small business owners to connect with their
customers on a personal level (Iglesias et al., 2020). Most of the participants explained
that they immediately recognized the importance of customer service when starting their
business. P1 stated: “Providing excellent customer service has always been part of my
strategy so that people would trust me and my brand.” P4 mentioned: “It is important to
know who my customers are because it’s helped me to develop relationships with them.
Knowing my customers gives me the opportunity to know what they want and meet their
needs.” All participants mentioned that many of their transactions come from repeat
customers of whom they have developed some type of relationship with. Study
participants stated that good customer service creates customer loyalty and free marketing
from word-of-mouth, which in turn increases profitability.
Support from Existing Literature and Conceptual Framework
According to McQuerry (2019), customer service is more about the entire
interaction with customers than being nice. Gleeson (2019) posited that customer service
is about meeting the customer’s need and striving for customer satisfaction. The way a
business owner treats their customer affects customer trust and loyalty (Iglesias et al.,
2020). Customer relations management is useful to cultivate and retain profitable
customers. By providing excellent customer service, business owners set themselves apart
71
from their competition, increase customer retention, and gain other customers through
referrals (Brown, 2018).
The result of these findings supports the interrelated components construct
of general systems theory (Appignanesi, 2018) because a business is composed of
several interrelated elements and any issue with one element affects the entire
business. Customer service affects customer retention and customer referrals.
Customer service can also affect pricing. Customers tend to be more content with
higher prices if there is quality service (Yand & Xia, 2022). Turner and Endres
(2017) posited that business owners must consider each business process to
achieve long term sustainability. Business owners may experience challenges with
some business processes because they do not acknowledge interconnected
components in their business system (Cao, 2017). Belinfanti and Stout (2018)
advised to view each business component as interconnected instead of focusing on
the individuality of one component so that business owners could implement more
efficient strategies to promote sustainability.
Emerging Theme 2: Capitalizing on Using Social Media Effectively
Social media is an essential marketing tool for business owners in promoting their
brand and increasing visibility (Singh & Zaki, 2017). Through promoting, business
owners connect with increase their customer reach and have better opportunities to
increase brand recognition and sales (Carnesi, 2020). The goal of promotional marketing
is to inform potential customers of products/services, get them to engage with the
72
business, and create profitability. Without a marketing strategy, owners limit their
potential reach. Small business owners can use social media as a marketing tactic to
promote their restaurant, increase visibility, and expand their reach.
Franco (2018) stated that businesses that want brand recognition should develop
strategies to access customers and research implementation methods. P3 said, “It’s not
just about reaching customers, you have to make sure you reach the people you’re trying
to sell to… your target audience.” Most of the participants mentioned they use hashtags
when making posts about their restaurant to reach potential customers outside of her
normal following base. Chen et al. (2022) believe that the use of hashtags (#; i.e., the
pound key) have become a fundamental component in social media communiation. Social
media users add the “#” symbol before relevant keywords that link their post to similar
content regarding the same topic (Rauschnabel et al., 2019). By using a least one hashtag,
social media users receive increased engagement (Chen et al., 2022).
Business owners can also increase visibility by engaging with their audience on
social media (Singh & Zaki, 2017). Four participants emphasized the importance of
responding to comments left on their social media pages. P1 said, “I enjoy responding to
comments because I like showing customers they matter.” P3, P4, and P5 stated they
respond to comments to show customers and consumers they are accessible.
So et al. (2017) suggested that visibility of consumption influences customer
brand recognition, which contributes positively to word-of-mouth communication. Mohr
(2017) opined that word-of-mouth is a type of buzz marketing that business owners
73
should take advantage of. According to the participants, online word-of-mouth is a highly
effective driver of customer recruitment, which increases sustainability and profitability.
P2 stated,
I decided to put a few signs out for customers to see that provided an incentive for
them. Each time they leave a review on my Facebook page, they receive 5% off
their order. By doing this, I was able to increase my following base, which meant
I reach more customers.
P5 encourages his patrons to leave reviews and comments on his Facebook page because
he knows that potential customers will read them.
Nguyen et al. (2021) posited that many consumers rely on and are influenced by
online reviews. Reviews on social media are testimonials that come from customers
informing readers about their experiences. Small business owners should capitalize on
reviews left on social media about their restaurant. Online word-of mouth is an effective
strategy to attract customers and increase profitability. Business owners increase their
competitive advantage when there is a high brand recognition and loyal customers.
Support from Existing Literature and Conceptual Framework
Social media is often used to express opinions and has become a trustworthy tool
for reviews because the feedback generally comes from actual customers (Nakano &
Kondo, 2018). (Alalwan et al., 2017) stated that business owners have the opportunity to
engage with their customers more, be more attentive to their feedback, and create
74
transparency. Promoting through social media has several advantages not limited to
gaining new customers, brand recognition, increased revenue, and social impact
(Jacobson et al., 2020). This theme supports Jiang and Erdem (2017), who contended that
social media is an aid in driving customer engagement and influencing purchasing
behavior.
Word-of-mouth is a useful marketing tool for business owners (Mohr, 2017).
Word-of-mouth is a low-cost, effective method for business owners to promote and
strengthen their brand because customers are spreading word to others of the business
quality (Dadzie et al., 2017). When small business restaurant owners identify their target
audience and tailor promotions to their taste, there is a positive effect on word-of mouth
(Markovic et al., 2018). Successful word-of-mouth leads to profitability and sustainability
and is a demonstration of the importance of developing customer relationships. This
emerging theme supports that online word-of-mouth positively impacts profitability due
to the reach of potential customers.
The responses from participants indicated that using social media to increase their
visibility is a successful promotion strategy that has helped to increase sustainability and
profitability.
This theme supports the opens systems construct of general systems theory. The
input includes the development and implementation of marketing strategies. The output
includes customer loyalty, referrals, and the opportunity to allocate funds to other
business processes. The data from participants and existing literature confirms that the
75
general systems theory was an appropriate framework to examine the marketing strategy
that small business restaurant owners use to remain profitable beyond 5 years.
Emerging Theme 3: Accentuating the Competitive Advantages of the Restaurant
Location
The location of a restaurant business is an essential element for its success
(Saleem, 2017). Choosing the right location is an aid for business owners in attracting
their target audience (Gholami & Trachter, 2021). P1 said, “When I moved here, I didn’t
see any coffee shops and thought this would be the perfect place to have one. I felt there
was a need.” P1 also noted that she faces challenges with parking periodically for her first
store and made sure to include easy accessibility when looking for the location of her
second store. P1’s restaurant is located on the outskirts of a major city. I observed that
P1’s coffee shop is in a small shopping center where there is high foot traffic.
P2’s restaurant is located near a high-traffic, tourist area. P2 discussed how he
wanted to put a soul food restaurant in a location where there was not much competition.
P2 stated,
I looked for a spot where I could appeal to locals that didn’t have a soul food
restaurant in their area. There are five different apartment complexes near me.
Also, I’m located near a major street where tourists visit and we’re 2 minutes
from the interstate.
I observed that P3’s restaurant is between two office buildings. P3 noted, “The
most important factor to me when choosing a building was making sure that I was close
76
to my customers and the appearance and infrastructure of the building.” P3 also explained
that he wanted the building to be a place he could design to match his brand. The building
infrastructure was critical because he wanted to avoid excessive utility costs to warm or
cool the building. P5 added that the cost of the building was a major consideration in
developing his location strategy.
Support from Existing Literature and Conceptual Framework
According to Gaskill-Elizabeth and Montgomery-Delta (2017), selecting a business
location is a long-lasting decision that impacts business performance. Cissé et al.
(2020) specified that choosing the right location is essential for maximizing profitability.
Gaskill-Elizabeth and Montgomery-Delta also posited that a pre-business location plan is
critical for business success regarding revenue and productivity; therefore, the strategy
should align with the business’ needs and mission.
One of the first steps in choosing a location is to determine the target audience
(Gholami & Trachter, 2021). Because the location of a business affects the operating
costs and stakeholders, business owners should choose restaurant locations where costs
and risks are minimized (Scarlat, 2020). Business owners should also ensure that the
location is easily accessible. The location also adds to the business brand. The business
goals most important to the restaurant will determine the ideal location. Small business
restaurants are more likely to be successful in a competitive location.
Participants of the study regarded the selection of a location as a strategic
contribution to their sustainability and profitability. This emerging theme aligns with
77
systems thinking, a construct of general systems theory (VonBertalanffy, 1972) because
selecting a location involves a thorough business analysis and critical decision-making
skills. Langstrand (2016) noted that systems thinking is an aid when performing
analytical evaluations for challenges and developing methods to address those challenges
with consideration of all business components. This emerging theme also correlates to the
holism and interrelated components constructs of general systems theory
(VonBertalanffy, 1972) in that an action in one area affects the entire system. The choice
of a business location affects all business processes not limited to revenue and business
costs, which are critical for sustainability and profitability. By using the systems thinking,
holism, and interrelated components constructs of general systems theory, business
owners can focus on choosing an ideal location and determine possible effects on other
business components. Small business restaurant owners should review their business
goals and choose a location that best aligns with their objectives and financing.
Applications to Professional Practice
The data collected and analyzed for this study was insightful on how small
business restaurant owners in the Southeastern region of the United States have managed
to sustain operations beyond 5 years. The findings of this study might be useful for
current and future small business restaurant owners in growing and maintaining business
profitability beyond 5 years. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: (a)
providing an excellent and non-substitutable customer service experience, (b) capitalizing
on using social media effectively, and (c) accentuating the competitive advantages of the
78
restaurant location. Small business restaurant owners may apply these findings to
improve business processes, sustainability, and profitability.
Customer relationship management (CRM) and relationship marketing are
applicable professional practices related to the emergent themes identified in my study.
Rahimi and Kozak (2017) define CRM as a business process and conceptual tool to
engage, attract, and retain customers. Relationship marketing is a facet of CRM with an
emphasis on cultivating more meaningful customer relationships (Trenggana & Cahyani,
2019). Business owners construct strategies for CRM to personalize products and services
for customers, which has proven to be advantageous for increasing profitability and
customer retention (Anshari et al., 2019). When restaurant owners build relationships
through excellent customer service, they equip themselves with the knowledge of how to
satisfy their customers and quickly resolve potential issues.
CRM is also an applicable business practice associated with business location
strategies. A business location strategy is highly important for small business restaurant
owners to, not only reduce business costs, but increase sustainability. Small business
owners should develop location strategies that engage and attract customers, which may
include focal points such as building aesthetics and neighborhood reputation (Hasse,
2018). The findings of this study may be an aid for small business restaurant owners in
creating a strategic plan prior to starting their business or a corrective action plan to
increase sustainability.
79
Implications for Social Change
Currently, the unemployment rate in the United States is 3.6% and that rate is
fluctuating (U.S Department of Labor, 2022). This study may contribute to social change
because small business owners are essential drivers in reducing unemployment rates
based on Maller and Wapshott’s (2017) research. Dahlstrom and Talmage (2018) echoed
that small business owners are key supporters of local communities because of the
employment opportunities they present and generation of tax revenues. Taxes paid by
small business owners help to pay for community improvements such as schools and
public transit. Profitable small business owners can stimulate local economies through the
circulation of money spent by consumers, whose spending could enhance the quality of
life and dignity of local citizens.
The study findings may also contribute to social change by fostering positive
relationships between small business owners and communities. Profitable small business
owners usually tend to be more involved in their communities by doing tasks such as
donating to charities and sponsoring local events. Because of their efforts in enhancing
the community, successful small business owners are considered to be pillars of the
community.
Lastly, this study may inspire a positive social change by encouraging innovation
and growth within the community. To remain competitive, business owners have to be
innovative and unique. When small business owners offer unique products and services,
they give the community a more distinct personality and create a more diverse
marketplace.
80
Recommendations for Action
The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore strategies used
by some small business restaurant owners to grow and maintain profitability to sustain
business beyond 5 years. While analyzing the data for this study, I identified three
emerging themes: (a) providing an excellent and non-substitutable customer service
experience, (b) capitalizing on using social media effectively, and (c) accentuating the
competitive advantages of the restaurant location. I have three recommendations that
could help small business restaurant owners to grow and maintain profitability to sustain
business beyond 5 years. The three recommendations include: (a) commit to a high level
of quality in customer service practices, (b) integrate effective social media tools into
their digital marketing efforts, and (c) conduct a detailed building location analysis that
aligns with business goals.
I recommend that small business restaurant owners commit to a high level of
quality in customer service practices that reinforce their business reputation. Restaurant
owners should develop strategies with a strong focus on customer satisfaction to forge
relationships and strengthen their brand. Restaurant owners should be more personable
with their customers and attentive to customer needs, which will also allow owners to
become more proactive than reactive. Through the creation of relationships, small
business restaurant owners will have a better understanding of their customers and how to
best to serve them. The way a business owner treats their customers contributes largely to
the business’s active status (Ward, 2019). Most customers will not support a business
where they are treated badly (Hyken, 2020). Small business restaurant owners must instill
81
in all employees that they are service providers; therefore, customer attraction and
retention is crucial.
My next recommendation for capitalizing on using social media effectively is for
small business restaurant owners to integrate effective social media tools into their digital
marketing efforts. One way to do so is by incorporating social icons into email templates
that drive consumers to social pages. Secondly, restaurant owners should use social media
to foster interactions that drive engagement such as empowering customers to share their
experiences and maintaining two-way communication with consumers. Restaurant
owners can use social media for advertising, engage with customers, and reach new
customers (Singh & Zaki, 2017). Finally, I recommend that restaurant owners tie their
brand to current events and holidays that are related to their food dishes. Small business
owners limit their reach without an effective marketing strategy that includes promotion
(Carnesi, 2020). They should also send emails that are linked to the restaurant’s social
accounts based on current events to drive engagement via social media.
My last recommendation is that future small business restaurant owners diligently
assess their business goals and determine their target audience before selecting a location.
When creating a location strategy, owners should also consider building size, operational
needs, building cost, competition, accessibility, neighborhood reputation, and the
infrastructure of the building. Hasse (2018) opined that choosing pre-existing
infrastructures is helpful for reducing business costs because the building has the
operational layout and equipment the business owner needs. Choosing an ideal location
will improve overall business performance. For restaurant owners who are presently in
82
their location, I recommend making aesthetic changes to the location that best align with
the business goals to attract and engage customers.
Recommendations for Further Research
To explore strategies for small business restaurant owners to remain sustainable
beyond 5 years, I chose to conduct a qualitative, multiple case study using five
participants in the Southeastern region of the United States. I identified three emerging
themes during the data analysis process: (a) providing an excellent and non-substitutable
customer service experience, (b) capitalizing on using social media effectively, and (c)
accentuating the competitive advantages of the restaurant location. My first
recommendation is for future researchers to use a different research method to obtain
more specific data on the themes identified. For instance, each participant of the study
placed a strong emphasis on the importance of developing a relationship with their
customers. Future researchers can use a quantitative research method to explore the
correlation between profitability and relationships.
I also recommend further research in a broader region because participant
responses may vary based on geographical reference. Choosing a sample from a broader
area will increase the generalization of the scope of the study, which increases the study’s
transferability. Finally, I recommend future researchers interview business owners who
have failed to sustain their restaurant beyond five years to identify specific factors that
contributed to their closure.
83
Reflections
While collecting data for this study, I began to develop a deeper understanding of
the challenges that small business restaurant owners face. I now understand that
providing good customer service is an excellent strategy to retain customers and obtain
customer referrals. In addition, I was able to hear from participants, in detail, on their
strategic use of social media to expand customer reach for their business. Lastly, I learned
the importance of choosing a business location because this element enhances
sustainability efforts. All participants in this study were eager to participate in this study
and provide insight on how they have managed to sustain beyond 5 years. Because of this
doctoral study, I have acquired new knowledge about small business restaurants that has
changed my perception on business practices in general.
Conclusions
The purpose of this study was to explore strategies used by some small business
restaurant owners to grow and maintain profitability to sustain business beyond 5 years.
Small businesses are critical for economic growth. Understanding strategies for achieving
sustainability can assist small business restaurant owners in increasing their profitability
and help stimulate the local economy through revenue circulation.
To conduct this study, data were collected from five small business restaurant
owners, who have sustained their business beyond 5 years, using semistructured
interviews. Three central themes emerged from the analysis of this study: (a) providing an
excellent and non-substitutable customer service experience, (b) capitalizing on using
84
social media effectively, and (c) accentuating the competitive advantages of the restaurant
location. According to the findings of this study, these are the three successful strategies
that small business restaurant owners should use to increase sustainability. Although these
three themes complement the findings of other investigators, the difference and the
research gap fulfilled regards the emphasis on competitive advantage and achieving the
perception of non-substitutability in customer’s minds.
The results of this study have implications for positive social change by providing
sustainable strategies for small business restaurant owners, which includes a reduction in
the unemployment rate and positive relationships fostered between restaurant owners and
the community. Using the strategies identified in the study can aid restaurant owners to
grow and maintain profitability to sustain beyond 5 years and help stimulate the local
economy through revenue circulation.
85
References
Aarsand, L., & Aarsand, P. (2019). Framing and switches at the outset of qualitative
research interviews. Qualitative Research, 19(6), 635-652.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118816623.
Abrons, I. M. (2018). Social media marketing among small retail clothing businesses
(Doctoral dissertation). https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4769/
Abutabenjeh, S., & Jaradat, R. (2018). Clarification of research design, research methods,
and research methodology: A guide for public administration researchers and
practitioners. Teaching Public Administration, 36(3), 237-258.
http://doi.org/10.1177/0144739418775787
Al Badi, K. S. (2018). The impact of marketing mix on the competitive advantage of the
SME sector in the Al Buraimi Governorate in Oman. Sage Open, 8(3), 1–9.
https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2158244018800838
Aleksandr, K., Jaroslav, B., Ludmila, K., & Pavla, P. (2016). The entrepreneurial
perception of SME business environment quality in the Czech Republic. Journal
of Competitiveness, 8(1), 66-78. http://www.doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.01.05
Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods
research: Challenges and benefits. Journal of Education and Learning, 5, 288-
296. http://www.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p288
Al-Shamaileh, O. (2018). I have issues with Facebook: But I will keep using it. IEEE
Technology and Society Magazine, 37(2), 40–45.
https://www.doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2018.2826078 Amankwah-Amoah, J., Boso,
86
N., & Antwi-Agyei, I. (2018). The effects of business failure experience on
successive entrepreneurial engagements: An evolutionary phase model. Group &
Organization Management, 43(4), 648–682.
https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1059601116643447
Archer-Brown, C., Kampani, J., Mardaer, B., Bal, A. S., & Kietzmann, J. (2017).
Conditions in pre-release movie trailers for stimulating positive word of mouth: A
conceptual model demonstrates the importance of understanding as a factor for
engagement. Journal of Advertising Research, 57(2), 159-172.
http://doi.org/10.2501/JAR- 2017-023
Arieftiara, D., Utama, S., & Wardhani, R. (2017). Environmental uncertainty as a
contingent factor of business strategy decisions: Introducing an alternative
measure of uncertainty. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal,
11(4), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i4.9
Arora, A., Bansal, S., Kandpal, C., Aswani, R., & Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Measuring social
media influencer index- insights from facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Journal of
Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 86-101.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.012
Atsan, N. (2016). Failure experiences of entrepreneurs: Causes and learning outcomes.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 435-442.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.054
Axelrod, N. N. (1999). Embracing technology: The application of complexity theory to
business. Strategy & Leadership, 27(6), 56-58. https://www.emerald.com/insight/
87
Bahadir, S. C., Bharadwaj, S., G., & Srivastava, R. S. (2015). Marketing mix and
brand sales in global markets: Examining the contingent role of country-market
characteristics. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(5), 596-619.
http://www.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.69
Bandyopadhyay, S. (2017). How a cost-effective social media plan can make a difference,
for small businesses. Journal of the Indiana Academy of the Social
Sciences, 19, 1-11. http://www.iass1.org/
Baškarada, S., Watson, J., & Cromarty, J. (2017). Balancing transactional and
transformational leadership. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25,
506-515. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2016-0978
Basri, W. S., & Siam, M. R. (2017). Maximizing the social media potential for small
businesses and startups: A conceptual study. International Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 11(2), 341-346. http://www.econ-society.org/index.php
Batra, S., Sharma, S., & Dixit, M. R. (2017). Does strategic planning determine
innovation in organizations? A study of Indian SME sector. Australian Journal of
Management, 24(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896217734893
Behrendt, P. (2017). An integrative model of leadership behavior. The Leadership
Quarterly, 28, 229-244. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.002
Bellavitis, C., Filatotchev, I., Kamuriwo, D. S., & Vanacker, T. (2017). Entrepreneurial
finance: New frontiers of research and practice: Editorial for the special issue
Embracing entrepreneurial funding innovations. Venture Capital, 19(1-2), 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2016.1259733
88
Belmont Report. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the
protection of human subjects of research. http://www.hhs.gov
Bentley-Goode, K. A., Newton, N. J., & Thompson, A. M. (2017). Business strategy,
internal control over financial reporting, and audit reporting quality. Auditing: A
Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51693
Berger, A. N., Goulding, W., & Rice, T. (2014). Do small businesses still prefer
community banks? Journal of Banking & Finance, 44, 264-278.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.016
Bhat, S. A., & Ahmad, D. M. (2018). Service, people and customer orientation: A
capability view to CRM and sustainable competitive advantage. Vision, 22(2),
163-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262918766132
Bishop, L., & Kuula-Luumi, A. (2017). Revisiting qualitative data reuse: A decade on.
Sage Open, 7(1), 1-15. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2158244016685136
Bodi, D., & Gotea, M. (2016). The evaluation of a professional development program in
social work. Using SWOT analysis as a evaluation method. Bulletin of the
Transilvania University of Brasov. Series VII: Social Sciences Law, 9(2), 123-
128. http://webbut.unitbv.ro/Bulletin/Series%20VII/
Bohnsack, R., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Value propositions for disruptive technologies:
Reconfiguration tactics in the case of electric vehicles. California Management
Review, 59(4), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617717711
Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description
approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1-8.
89
https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
Bridgen, S. (2017). Using systems theory to understand the identity of academic advising:
A case study. NACADA Journal, 37, 9-20.
https://www.doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-15-038
Broks, A. (2016). Systems theory of systems thinking general and particular within
modern science and technology education. Journal of Baltic Science Education,
15, 408-410. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51047
But, J. W. P., & Ap, J. (2017). The impacts of casino tourism development on Macao
residents’ livelihood. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 9, 260–273.
https://www.doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-02-2017-0011
Canada Newswire. (2020). COVID-19: Coming to the aid of restaurateurs. Canada
Newswire, http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/April2020/16/c1388.html
Cao, J., Jiang, Z., & Wang, K. (2016). Customer demand prediction of service-oriented
manufacturing incorporating customer satisfaction. International Journal of
Production Research, 54(5), 1303-1321.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1067377
Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F., J, & Rehman, S. S. (2016). Mode 3 knowledge
production: Systems and systems theory, clusters and networks. Journal of
Innovation and Entrepreneurship; Heidelberg, 5(1), 1-24.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016-0045-9
Carr, E. M., Zhang, G. D., Ming, J. (., & Siddiqui, Z. S. (2019). Qualitative research: An
overview of emerging approaches for data collection. Australasian Psychiatry,
90
27(3), 307-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856219828164
Caws, P. (2015). General systems theory: It’s past and potential. Systems Research &
Behavioral Science, 32, 514-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2353
Centers for Disease Control and Infection. (2020). Centers for Disease Control and
Infection.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html
Chiumento, A., Rahman, A., Frith, L., Snider, L., & Tol, W. (2017). Ethical standards for
mental health and psychosocial support research in emergencies: A review of
literature and current debates. Globalization and Health, 13(1).
https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0231-y
Clapp, J. T., Gleason, K. A., & Joffe, S. (2017). Justification and authority in institutional
review board decision letters. Social Science & Medicine, 194, 25-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.013
Clark, K. R., & Vealé, B. L. (2018). Strategies to enhance data collection and analysis in
qualitative research. Radiologic Technology (RADIOL TECHNOL), 89(5), 482-
485. http://www.asrt.org
Cole, H. S., DeNardin, T., & Clow, K. E. (2017). Small service businesses: Advertising
attitudes and the use of digital and social media marketing. Services Marketing
Quarterly, 38(4), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2017.1394026