P a g e | 1
THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS IN DISABILITY ADVOCACY
1. FOUNDATIONS OF DISABILITY SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
The disability rights movement began as a social justice advocacy movement beginning in the
1960s with disabled World War II and Vietnam War veterans who had no civil rights, no
accommodations in workplaces or schools, and no access to public buildings when they came
home from war. Thus, early advocacy started with the actions of disability activists in opposing
the lack of provision of adequately accessible means of transportation, as well as the absence of
accessible architecture. Some activist groups of the same era like the Rolling Quads wanted
people to know there was injustice and fight for laws that would reduce discriminations on
disabled people.
Throughout the seventies and eighties, the movement witnessed various organizations like the
League of the Physically Handicapped and the American Coalition of Citizens with Disabilities
that carried out organized protests and demonstrations termed as 504 demonstrations. These
resulted in more national focuses on inaccessibility of public areas and absence of provisions.
Some of the main legislative achievements which can be as a result of lobbying by the disability
rights movement include architectural barriers act of 1968, the rehabilitation act of 1973 and the
Americans with disability act of 1990.
It also revealed the Independent Living Movement, which focused on the principles of the
disabled persons’ autonomy and the ability to take on their own lives. Some of the services
inclusive of attendant care services, housing services, employment services, and other
community-based services were advocated for by such groups like the Center for Independent
P a g e | 2
Living. Advancements in legal decisions concerning the rights of disabled people in institutions
and in the area of education for disability served to establish important court victories.
The self-advocacy movement which is the advocacy groups of people with development and
intellectual disability is also another essential base of the disability rights movement of the past
and present too. Some of the organizations that have been at the forefront in pressing for change
include the Self Advocates Becoming Empowered in all the four rights namely, rights to
inclusion, integration and self-determination. The rallying cry "Nothing About Us Without Us"
encapsulates the ethos of this strand of advocacy: that policies should not be formulated without
an inclusion of the people with disability. [It has been self-advocacy over the years and has been
important in the promotion of rights and services for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
a. Theories of social movements
Theories of social movements are related with foundations of disability social movements in
understanding why the oppressed groups engage in collective action in the struggle for change.
In the early systems, centrality was given to features of group structure and characteristics such
as resource mobilization theory that defined organizational resources to power movements or
political opportunity theory that defined ease of mobilization in the political sphere. Extensions
based on such structures are relatively recent and go further afield into cultural aspects. Framing
theory focuses on the shared injustice frames used by groups to justify the reason to mobilize
while the new social movement theory concerns itself with the formation of identity which
instigates collective mobilization.
Expounding on these to disability social movements, resource mobilization theory highlights the
need for such organizations like Disabled Peoples International or ADAPT that mobilize
P a g e | 3
resources that help coordinate activism among disabled populations. Looking at the political
opportunity theory, it is important to note the policy windows such as the Americans with
Disabilities Act that provided disability advocates with the necessary tools for demanding further
change. Framing theory is pertinent in explaining how within disability communities the social
model of disability was reframed from a medical model in terms of individual impairments to
social oppression of such individuals, energizing disabled subjectivities. In recent social
movement theory, there is more emphasis on the tradition of self-advocacy and culture-creating
processes in the disability movement constituencies that strengthened the group consciousness.
Interpreting foundations of disability social movements through the lens of sociological theories
such as these enriches the knowledge of the experience of the other oppressed groups’ journey
towards their struggle against domination, it provides an insight into the mobilizing structures
such as organizations and resources, political opportunities, injustice frames and oppositional
identities. Whereas early theories placed a focus on structural properties cultural constructs are
also seen as equally important for the extent that marginalized subgroups construct experiences
and collectively construct disabled identities through social movement action.
b. Historical context of disability activism
Disability rights movement can be dated back to the post World War II America scenario that
saw many disabled veterans return home only to be shut from mainstream society, it served to
bring awareness to disability concerns and provided a foundation for advocacy. Historic events
in the 1950s and the 1960 took the initial steps towards legal rights and options to
institutionalization with the formulation of independent living centers and the first civil rights act
related lawsuits.
P a g e | 4
Disabled people’s organizations like the League of the Physically Handicapped and the Rolling
Quads through public protests and various acts of civil disobedience, advocated for the end to
disability discrimination and policy changes in relation to public and private transport, buildings
and structures, education, health and employment. They made significant strides in the following
legislation; Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 which barred
discrimination against the disabled by agencies of the federal government, contractors and those
receiving federal funds respectively.
During the seventies, the formation of organizations advocating for the disabled was noticed on
the national and local level. Independent living movement supported ideas of self-empowerment,
peer choice, support by fellow consumers and shift from medical to social model of disability.
Paradigm shifts took place with people with disabilities being viewed as a minority who should
be granted the rights of citizenship instead of being treated as objects of pity.
The subsequent stage of advocacy began with expansion of medical and legal gains,
enforcement of these policies and extensions of coverage to other categories of illnesses.
Informal activism mobilized the protests that were formal in regards to inaccessible
transportation like the 504 sit-ins, where people in wheelchairs including those from ADAPT
chained themselves to the buses. Prominent civil rights legal actions enhanced the constitutional
requirement for integration of students in public schools. The pinnacle accomplishment of this
period was the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act which offered integrated safeguards for
virtually all spheres of life availing a ban on discrimination, the demand for reasonable
adjustments and improved access for individuals with physical or mental impairments.
P a g e | 5
c. Intersection with other civil rights movements
The disability rights movement is closely related to the other civil rights movements in the
United States that took place in the 20th century, as it replicated most of the experiences that
involve discrimination and segregation, denial of access as well as violations of rights of the
disabled persons. Disability rights movement locates itself in the setting of other civil and human
liberation movements from the 1950s to the1990s, which implies the movements shared time,
ideas, support and could work together with activists and advocates. Activists from disability,
racial justice, women’s, LGBTQ equality and other organizations realized that people from
different backgrounds can join together and compel societal change that everybody longed for.
For instance, in presenting disability rights demands for law changes similar to the Architectural
Barriers Act, disability rights campaigners drew from measures like the Civil Rights Act of 1964
that banned discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Measures
provided in the adaptation concerned defining access for of people with disabilities to the
buildings and territories. Precisely, the deaf activists were encouraged by protests, marches and
civil disobedience by Martin Luther King Jr and had to emulate similar aggressive
strategies. People with disabilities also marched simultaneously with anti-Vietnam War and
women’s liberation protests to bring vigor and force to the fight for a better world into different
causes. People with physical, sensory, intellectual, and psychiatric disabilities banded together
and developed cross-disability organizations to collectively campaign against forced
confinement, limited legal rights, and prejudice.
Had there been no solidarity, the progressive movements that intersect with disability activism
and advocacy over the past few decades to push for additional disability rights reforms such as
the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
P a g e | 6
would not have happened. Despite these percentages’ improvements, civil rights intersections
have a lot to do with progress as people with disabilities are still discriminated in employment,
healthcare, housing, education and several other areas, there is still much to be done to achieve
the rights for all and the respect of the dignity of all human beings.
d. Key figures in early disability advocacy
Historically, disabled people’s liberation and organized struggle against discrimination began
around the 1960s and 1970s in some parts of the world such as the United States and United
Kingdom. There were also several important activists and advocates who campaigned for
changes in disability policies and ways in which disability is perceived and who also helped
shape the later disability rights legislation. Ed Roberts was paralyzed by polio in his youth, and
was one of the first severely-disabled students to be admitted to the University of California at
Berkeley in 1962. He is famously renowned today as the ‘father of the independent living
movement’, which entailed disabled people’s right to self-governance for their own lives.
Disability rights activist Judith Heumann led protests in the 60s and 70s Including a sit-in to seek
the mainstreaming of disabled students in public schools. Heumann also co-founded the
organization called World Institute on Disability. In UK for instance, Paul Hunt was locked up in
an institution up to the age of sixteen years due to Cerebral palsy. Since the early 70s, he actively
advocated for higher standards and legal protection of residents of social care homes. Another
was Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, formed in 1974, prevention of
utilization of disabled persons, to be controlled by disabled people themselves, not caregivers, or
professionals. Although this list is not exhaustive, Roberts, Heumann, Hunt, UPIAS and the
disability rights activists that aligned with them were crucial in the development of disability
issues as a civil rights cause and important milestones toward ending discrimination and
P a g e | 7
prejudice against disabled people, shifting paradigms regarding capability of disabled persons,
and setting social and philosophical frameworks for the later disability rights movement through
enactment and accomplishment as well as by providing the philosophies of equal rights,
independence They were passionate about disability in the early times and coined ways of
understanding disability beyond medical and charitable but as a social and political cause that
was informed by previous advocates to carry forward the mantle of disability rights movement.
e. Evolution of disability rights philosophy
The disability rights movement has roots in the philosophical underpinnings of other mid
twentieth-century civil rights movements which sought to argue that no person should be denied
their civil liberties and should be allowed full citizenship regardless of disability. The initial
perspectives of disability management were driven by the medical model, which portrayed the
disabled persons as ‘abnormal’ individuals who required treatment or attention. But disabled
people gradually denied such a prognosis and started effectively advocating their own position
and experiences. The women’s liberation movement and the black power movement’s self-
empowerment approach influenced disability activists who posited for the social model of
disability in terms of Environmental barrier -Disability.
This new framework led to the Independent Living Movement in the 1970s where the disabled
individuals were involved in managing their own affairs and demanded for self-determination
and policy changes to support the diminished barrier in society for the disabled. Mobility
impaired groups such as the Rolling Quads, the Disabled in Action group, and ADAPT in
particular relied on provocative measures to draw attention and ensure that laws such as the
Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act were implemented. Their dogmatic
P a g e | 8
unyielding demands for equality and recognition of independence and rights resonated with
previous civil rights movements and brought into limelight a marginalized group.
Increased awareness and organising paved way to further progression in disability philosophy
that promoted the recognition of shared human experiences rather than the ‘able and disabled’
dichotomy. Both the theory and practice of integration fostered new orientations and behaviors
for the total integration and enfranchisement of the disabled in all spheres of community life. The
legal rights and increased acceptance of disability experience led to the next steps in the
advancement of the policies, which opened opportunities for choice, inclusion and access.
2. STRATEGIES AND TACTICS IN DISABILITY ADVOCACY
Today’s modern social movements would not have been possible in the absence of the early self-
advocacy organizations by people with intellectual disabilities in Sweden in the late 1960s, the
disability rights movement in the United States which lead to the passage of the Americans with
Disabilities Act in 1990. Therefore, some of the tactics used by disability advocates and activists
within social movements have been awakening, networking, lobbying, demonstrating,
demanding, and suing. For example, ADAPT, a low-profile disability rights organization in the
US, also employs wheelchairs to protest by stopping intersections, chaining a wheelchair-bound
person to buses and federal buildings, this is done to appeal to the media, garner public sympathy
and support, and exert pressure on lawmakers to change policies. Other groups such as Not Dead
Yet have concentrated their activism campaigns on campaigning against legalization of assisted
suicide and euthanasia for fear that the disabled will be eliminated. Globally, examples such as
Disabled Peoples International, the disabled activists from the global North and the South have
met to share ideas and establish an empowered disability rights movement. Approaches vary
across cultures and politics while movements direct the group spirit, oneness, and existence of
P a g e | 9
disability populations towards their call on society for equal treatment and inclusion. Empirical
evidence shows that systemic ableism characterized by policies, practices, attitudes, and
environments may warrant persistent, coordinated, and collaborative efforts. Legal cases and
policies provide important stepping stones, so too does the fight for altering culture in order to
eliminate the stigma around disability and to assert that the disabled are human. Therefore, social
movements are crucial toward the promotion of disability rights and justice through the tried and
novel strategies.
a. Protests and direct action
Activism and especially demonstrations and strikes have also been a core strategy in the context
of disability rights movements. Protests which have been applied include sit-ins, marches,
blockades, occupations of buildings, and other forms of nonviolent civil disobedience as people
with disability have sought to draw public attention to matters concerning them and ensure
policy reforms with a view to getting equal rights and opportunities. While these strategies
predate the Disability Rights Movements of the 1980s, they were employed by the broader Civil
Rights movements of the 1950s and 1960s. A number of disability protests in the 1970s and
1980s by organizations such as ADAPT staged highly-publicized protest campaigns against
inaccessibility of public transport and forced the lawmakers to pass legislation like the
Americans with Disabilities. Similarly, other bodies like Not Dead Yet have conducted protests
and sit-ins to oppose changes or reductions in the scope of services provided by home- and
community-based care services.
Street protests, for instance, may seek to occupy a particular area or disrupt an event in order to
be visible and observed. ADAPT has often demonstrated outside the Congress or political
conventions to advocate for reforms that enhance care for impaired Medicaid patients. Likewise,
P a g e | 10
disabled activists have ‘crashed’ the telethon such as the Jerry Lewis Telethon in which the
Organization has been accused of perpetuating pity tokenism and the charitable model of
disability. Altogether these are confrontational though non-violent strategies seek to put an issue
on the public policy agenda, influence the opinion makers, gain support amongst liberal political
organizations, the disability community’s capacity to organize and communicate the message
that this minority will not wait for its rights. Such impatience can be explained by decades of
marginalization and understanding that directing anger to the wrong subject may actually be
counterproductive to appeals to reason. Thus, specific precautions guarantee that in decision-
making, actions stay disciplined.
b. Legal advocacy and strategic litigation
Legal mobilization and legal argumentation are critical elements in any struggle for the disability
rights. This method applies force to recalcitrant institutions to conform to the statute, especially
the Americans with Disabilities Act. Impact lawsuits force changes, ignite legal change, and
spread the culture of acceptance and integration. Strategic cases challenge discrimination, seek
equality, facilitate and improve assistance and services, demand higher quality of services, gain
more control and choice, gain better healthcare, gain better opportunity to move around, get
better chance to learn, get better chance to work, and gain better chance to live in the
community.
The advocacy entities out there come across blatant violations of civil rights laws, finds people
willing to complain, and hires lawyers familiar with disability decree to file a complaint. Plea
demands the court to punish violations, seek justice for wrongs done and declare as unlawful and
against the provisions of the constitution policies or practices eroding entitlements. Judgments
and consent decrees which emanate from such cases, may affect an entire industry or sector since
P a g e | 11
it brings the changes. For instance, legal cases against ride-sharing firms led to changes in
specific country’s accessibility services for wheelchair users. However, outcomes of these cases
apply only to the immediate parties in dispute while other cases are taken to higher courts which
offer comprehensive decisions. Multiple injury-institution legal actions using a number of
aggrieved parties offer higher likelihoods of creating precedents that impact national norms.
However, to certify the class, there should be proof of a pattern of, and frequent violations of the
legal provision at issue.
Litigation proves to be demanding stress-wise and financially for plaintiffs unless funded by
factions with a stake in the case’s outcome. Most suits are resolved outside of court and by
contract; few ever become reported and therefore precedential cases. Even the ones who apply
legal proceduralism in coming to a conclusion depend on judicial discretion. However, one has
to understand that even in the highest levels of the court, such as the appellate courts, progressive
judgments can be reversed. The process of implementation and the monitoring of the remedies is
also a continuous process since the adjudicators presiding over the cases will always recommend
the necessary remedies. Thus, strategic litigation is most effective when accompanied by forceful
public awareness, policy advocacy, lawful demonstration, and media mobilization to enlist the
spirit of the populace for the cause.
c. Media campaigns and public awareness
The roles of media campaigns and public awareness are essential in disability advocacy as their
use enhances voices and priorities of marginalized communities, transforms perceptions and
fosters legislative or policy changes, strategically applied and communicated to the general
public both online and offline, messages capture the interest of the target population, incite
discussions, inform their opinion, and encourage them to take specific actions on important
P a g e | 12
disability issues. Campaigners address the issue of inequality and injustice and at the same time,
provide viable solutions and hope.
Effective communication ultimately personalizes the disability experience by using persuasive
individual stories that ensure the audience can relate by calling for their sympathy to combat
stereotypical or prejudicial perceptions from the general society. Engagement of such opinion
makers, prominent personalities and other identifiable brand ambassadors within a campaign
enhances the awareness front of the campaign, to engage voters while informing them, the
campaign architects need to use language as a powerful tool without off-putting various
audiences. Hence, the choice of images turned out to be equally important, as the visuals either
support or subvert the expected imagery.
Whereas, novelty campaigns aim to push for specific behavioral or societal overhauls, providing
action-oriented triggers. It may consist of political actions or advocating for changes to laws,
economic actions like purchasing preferences or working for certain employers, or altering the
culture and layout of society, including spaces, to make them more accessible. To improve
response rates, reinforcement should be offered in the form of guidelines, points to useful tools
or live examples. The polling, Metrics Reports and Ongoing polling quantification all form the
post-campaign impact poll after the conclusion.
To scale up the impacts and effects, campaigns usually link up with other bigger processes such
as policy discussions or events that open up the intended audience. The paid media in the
relevant markets and shared free of charge through the social networks help broaden distribution.
Having collaborations with big and well-recognized non-profit organizations or brands helps.
Relevance to the present palate and conventions of everyday life helps such creations remain
P a g e | 13
relevant. This prevents the messages from getting stale or off-message through regular
adjustments to reflect the effectiveness of the current messages in the targeted audiences over
very long periods. As people’s perception becomes progressively liberal, elaborate media
campaigns are bound to continue to play an imperative role in disability advocacy’s pursuit of
policy changes.
d. Coalition building and intersectional alliances
The formation of coalitions and intersectionality is one of the key tools in the struggle for
disability rights, not even the disabled community which suffers a lot of discrimination and
limitation in their access to social resources can make the change alone it has to unite with other
oppressed groups. Creating a network for disability advocates and organizers with other social
justice movements from reproductive justice, racially /ethnically marginalized, LGBTQ equality,
workers’ rights etc., allows for knowledge/resource exchange, policy agendas, raise issues
affecting intersectional identities within the disabled community, and strengthening through
increased numbers.
A clear example of timely coalition formation is the reproductive justice movement focusing on
the advancement of bodily sovereignty for disabled people. Originally the reproductive rights
movement primarily focused on only able-bodied cisgender women, meanwhile, issues such as
forced sterilization of mentally disabled individuals were not deemed important. The disability
activists recognized this omission started attending reproductive rights marches with signs such
as ‘Disabled Women Have a Right to Parent’ and got acquainted with the organizers. Slowly and
slowly, disability advocacy principles began to be incorporated into the reproductive justice
agenda, state laws protecting disabled people’s reproductive rights were enacted, this showed it
P a g e | 14
is possible to work collectively across movements and to raise up different narratives into a
wider collective to move forward.
Since the construction of intersectional alliances demands an appreciation of struggle, there is
need to focus on the need to understand shared struggle in the context of social justice. While
disability oppression housing discrimination and police violence affect different people the
unifying factor is society’s inability to respect the value, autonomy and accessibility
requirements of some individuals in the society based on their identity. Approaching these issues
as a common fight for the violation of these fundamental rights rather than a fight for a share of
the resources can force advocacy groups to collaborate, support each other’s protests, and
educate their followers about intersectionality so that they pool their power together. The
decision making should consider the diversity of the people in the community; persons with
multiply marginalized status should be represented. Coalitions so structured disregard any
oppression hierarchy and instead have common interests in racial, economic, gender, disability
justice.
e. Policy lobbying and legislative advocacy
Policy lobbying and legislative advocacy form part and parcel of disability rights activism that
seeks to effectively bring about policy change or even new legislation for equality, accessibility
and inclusion. Groups engage diverse approaches pressuring legislators/policymakers; leveraging
constituents to write/call for priority issues; creating policies and policy drafts; providing
testimonies during hearings; cultivating relationships with legislators to become advocates for
bills. Some of the strategies include appealing to ethos by presenting values/morals, pathos by
presenting figures/monetary values, and logos by focusing on the chances of victory and the
P a g e | 15
support of the entire population voters. The processes are complicated, and one has to schedule a
meeting with the legislators/staff, which might not be easy, and the message has to be framed in a
way that appeal to ideologies or self- interest. It is imperative that for groups to apply their power
they must lobby from within in addition to outside protest in the form of strikes, media. Persona,
credibility, and tenacity are the most important components; relationship development,
professional information sharing, and perseverance in the face of adversity are crucial. ‘Insider
Versus Outsider’: ‘Pragmatic Versus Principled’: How are groups positioned today as they
navigate between legislative negotiations for incremental change and protest politics that capture
attention with policy positions? Strategic adaptability is the ability to take political opportunities
as they are in the external environment as remain critical. Organizations work towards different
policy agendas over many years, they prepare stages before advancing main bills. Policies are
not destroyed with election cycles or leadership changes but advocacy infrastructure is kept
ongoing. The following is a list of new points that arise requiring advocacy additions such as
health, tuition, shelter, commute, for which data/messaging may be outdated. Groups advance
advocacy by using those in leadership positions of the disabled and by using narratives to
communicate the true experiences of those within the disabled culture, they set up rights to be
continued and built upon through laws, rules, funding. Continued implementation supervision
ensures that passed bills are not only enacted but also result in productive changes. It is,
therefore, important to note that by advocacy, which is the process of mobilizing, lobbying and
applying power in its forms of organization, groups alter disabling contexts.
3. MAJOR DISABILITY RIGHTS CAMPAIGNS
In the past, people with disabilities have benefited from social movements that sought to extend
their rights and mainstream opportunities, the disability civil rights movement in the United
P a g e | 16
States in mid part of the twentieth century entailed several significant campaigns whose main
objectives were to pass laws and change policies that would encourage the elimination of
discrimination against and barriers to persons with disabilities. During the 1930s and 1940s, the
League of the Physically Handicapped, an organization started in New York City for the purpose
of the eradication of prejudice in jobs of the New Deal, employed direct action in an effort to
facilitate policy modifications with sit-ins, pickets, and demonstrations. They contributed to the
later disability rights movement by creating effective protests; The attention-grabbing campaigns
they initiated were followed by later disability rights movements.
In the 1950s, parent groups started campaigning for the rights of the disabled in that they desired
the same educational chance like the other children; this included children with mental
retardation, the deaf, blind and those with emotional problems. Campaigns made at the local
level paved way for significant federal legislation in the future. With the civil rights movement
ascending in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s, other disability rights organization began
to draw positive influence from the movement and adopted protestation of injustices. The main
aspects of accessibility campaigns were on the removal of physical and attitudinal barriers in
schools, commercial buildings, public transport facilities, and the built-up areas. Women and taxi
raucous and marches brought the issue to the forefront of public debate. A battle took place and
the following laws were passed in a short period of time, Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, the Fair
Housing Amendments Act of 1988.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 signified the highest level of coordinated activity of
national, state and local disability groups that were involved in advocacy-based campaigns, it
P a g e | 17
worked to ensure that the Americans with disability enjoy equal rights and have equal protection
against discrimination. Champion policies were attained due to consistent lobbying for the
formation of coalitions, extensive use of media to create awareness, peaceful protests, legislation
campaigns and legal cases. The various actors in the social movement of disability rights
advocacy laid an agenda for change in systems across civil, political, social and economic
domains and did not relent in their collective efforts over several decades with the successful
accomplishment of the goals of achieving better civil rights, services and opportunities for
disabled persons.
a. Deinstitutionalization movement
Deinstitutionalization is a process that aimed at transferring patients with disabilities and mental
disorders from large state-funded facilities and hospitals to lower-residential homes. It developed
from concerns and calls for reform for rights abuse and poor treatment of patients in asylums and
other mental health and development facilities in the 1960s and 1970s. Scalpel and media
uncovered sadistic cases of torture, hunger, filthy conditions and overcrowding, lack of care and
stimulation for the patients. Critics claimed that it put people with disabilities in forced isolation
and segregation against their wills; critics also noted that large numbers of residents in large
congregate living arrangements could not protect privacy, autonomy, and normalization. The
mainstream disability rights activism formed coalitions with the deinstitutionalization activists
with the aim of closing state institutions for people with disabilities and establishing community
support services.
Some of the enabling statutes for deinstitutionalization include the Mental Retardation Facilities
and Community Mental Health Centers Construction Act of 1963, and the Developmental
P a g e | 18
Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 1984 that granted money to states for the
establishment of services instead of institutions for the mentally incapacitated. Legal actions
were also sought relative to rights of individuals who were detained including the time that they
were detained. The process of deinstitutionalization continued in the 1990s and 2000s But there
have been criticisms concerning the lack of provision of appropriate community services that
would enable individuals to be relocated from institutions successfully and prevent cases of
homelessness or re-incarceration. Disability activism with regards to community living has
remained steadfast in seeking funding for integrated, individualized, community-based options
for living rather than in institutions despite the debates on safety and service provisions
necessary for those with the most significant disabilities.
b. Section 504 sit-ins
The sit-ins of Section 504 in 1977 are considered to mark one of the milestones for the disability
rights’ activism, as the act of civil disobedience had its impact. Pissed off due to protracted non-
implementation of anti-discrimination code of practices required to be set up by Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act, segregation watch dogs began a new round of protest meetings across the
country targeting HEW, Department of Health, Education and Welfare. On 5th April 1977, 200
protesters stormed the HEW offices across the nation and the protests in San Francisco and
Seattle, went on for more than three weeks. They called for tangible measures that would reduce
discrimination of disabled persons and enhance access to structures by such persons. They had to
work hard to get the objective successfully met through protests that faced opposition from the
HEW Secretary Joseph Califano and arrests of protesters. On fourth of April Califano signed the
regulations, and the protests ended on May first. This victory was important not only for the
prospect of for winning the campaign’s specific goal of getting Section 504 regulations passed
P a g e | 19
but also the campaign’s future of this disability rights movement. The sit-ins brought awareness
of disability to the public and also grossed the support of more civil rights organizations and led
to more protests, they demonstrated the use of direct action to make a point that government
agencies indeed needed to respond to the pleas of people with disabilities; they also provided
foundations for subsequent legislation like the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The
Section 504 sit-ins thus represent an important part of the history as the people showed that only
joint effort and determination in struggle for equal rights and creation of accessible environment
will work.
c. Capitol Crawl and ADA passage
The march to the Capitol took place on March 12, 1990, and was an important occasion in the
history of disability rights movement in the United States of America, prior to the voting on the
Americans with Disabilities Act ADA in congress, over one thousand activists, some in
wheelchairs, with canes, walking aids or crawling gathered at the stairs of the Capitol. Shouting
slogans and brandishing their placards and banners, these spirited demonstrators sought to coax
the legislators into enacting fuller civil liberties enshrinement. Led by the ADAPT, an
organization of disabled people who prefer the title the American Disabled for Attendant
Programs Today, the Capitol Crawl was both strategic and effective in garnering media attention,
thus portraying the daily reality millions of disabled Americans face in their struggle to
overcome obstacles in a world that remains largely inaccessible. After the strong show, ADAPT
leader Wade Blank, other disability leaders who joined Harkin to lobby for the bill got a chance
to discuss with the Senator Tom Harkin who was one of the bill’s sponsors, though to gain more
votes some employments, industry provisions, transportation and issues on independent living
were compromised as some groups complained that the lawmakers sold out on them. President
P a g e | 20
George H. W. Bush signed the ADA into law later that year making it unlawful for any person to
discriminate against the handicapped on the ground of such disability and made it mandatory that
in manner of accommodations and services, changes were to be made in public and commercial
facilities. Signed into law with the support of all but one member of the Congress and hailed by
its sponsors as stating an equality of opportunity, equality of access, and equality of civil rights
for the disabled, the Americans with Disabilities Act results in policy changes in education,
transportation facilities, and technologies among others. At the time advocates celebrated it as
the world’s first comprehensive statement of equality for people with disabilities but critics
asserted that ambiguous reasonable accommodation provisions offered little direction and that
the new legislation could take years of litigation to define interpreting which also proved to be
true. However, reminiscing about the Capitol Crawl after three decades is useful to understand
how civil disobedience and self-motivated advocates can bring changes at the legislative level
and create groundbreaking opportunities, as well as access to society for disabled people.
d. Not Dead Yet and right-to-life advocacy
Not Dead Yet originated in 1996 as an association of the disability rights’ activists who are
against legalization of assisted suicide or euthanasia as further types of discrimination against
old/ill/ disabled populations. This understanding of assisted suicide/euthanasia as social issues
threatens the rights of disabled people and services for delivery because of the ‘right to die’. Not
Dead Yet states that it is in similar vein as the right-to-life campaigns opposing assisted
suicide/euthanasia as the first step towards legalized killing of citizens without their permission.
However, Not Dead Yet disagrees with the pro-life camp on certain issues such as abortion and
the right to decide on matters regarding end-of-life treatment such as refusing treatment. For Not
Dead Yet the response is not in advocacy for suicide but in enhancing service delivery and
P a g e | 21
attitudes toward life with impairment through respect for inherent principles of relation,
assistance, adjustment. Activists of Not Dead Yet claimed that legal assisted suicide/euthanasia
endanger the large group of disabled people and their supporters who do not qualify as terminal
or near death. This leads to the second problem: The assisted suicide/ euthanasia movement
equates disability with suffering and incapacitation which necessitates mercy killing, further
hindering any shift in predominant medical conceptions of disability from individual defect or
illness which inevitably leads to pain and seclusion. Similar to how Hahn a disability theorist
went on to describe physician assisted suicide as the epitome of medical social control over the
disabled and an endorsement of stigma and the public declaration that such lives are not worth
living. On the other hand, Not Dead Yet highlights that disability rights entail autonomy and
freedom to make choices including and especially not to die but to choose life within the society
and free from barriers. The lack of supports or the option to live without support or die is not a
viable choice; all options should be supported in some manner. Not Dead Yet connects limitation
of assisted suicide to guaranteeing economic equity, independent living services, rehabilitation
engineering, built environment, and universally designed products and education.
e. Nothing About Us Without Us campaign
On the same token, the disability rights slogan ‘Nothing about Us Without Us’ is an expansion of
the thought that policies should not be developed without representatives of affected
communities. his made them launch the disability rights movement by voicing one of their main
complaints. Before the emergence of disabled people’s political activism, disabled people were
powerless, and the policies governing their lives were made without their input. The Nothing
About Us Without Us movement insisted that the affected individuals themselves must sit at
those decision-making tables.
P a g e | 22
This philosophy manifested itself in decisions in 1990 when more than 1000 activists invaded
congressional office to protest against attempts to amend the Americans with Disabilities Act
then under preparation. The people power rallied many groups of disabled persons; The
Association of Retarded Citizens, The American Association of Disabled Persons and the
American Council for the Blind among them. It is therefore argued that their united voice and
body language sent signals that no compromise would be accepted on issues of employment,
transportation, public accommodation and telecommunications. Finally, the legislation was
enacted by lawmakers resulting into law reforms that enhanced access to inclusion,
independence and quality of life for over 43 million populaces.
The Nothing About Us Without Us slogan remains relevant from school boards to the United
Nations as disabled citizens assert their right to be meaningfully involved in decision-making
processes that affect them and not be subjected to policy implementation with little regard to the
financial and other implications for the individual. This central theme paved the way for the
awareness of a constituency that wanted to reclaim their right to steer their own lives and receive
equal opportunities that led to the formation of disability justice achievements such as the
ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities treaty.
4. GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON DISABILITY MOVEMENTS
Disability rights activism involves the fight for civil and human rights, as well as standing for the
rights of those with disabilities in local and international contexts, it has been societies’ voices in
form of social movements, that have played a crucial role in raising awareness, protesting for
changes, and demanding change in policies concerning disability justice. These mass
demonstrations are usually involved with protests, media advocacy, legal proceedings, and
lobbying methodology in order to persuade the stakeholders to change the discriminative laws,
P a g e | 23
inaccessible environments, absence of facilities, and higher prevalence of abuse, violence, and
other forms of oppression against disabled people.
Disability rights in the United States expanded over the middle of the twentieth century, and
organizations like the League of the Physically Handicapped protested the exclusionary policy of
the public transportation systems through active protests, using the momentum gained by civil
rights movements, activists recast the notion of disability as socially produced, and spoke of
environmental barriers as the source of disability. Aims shifted from the accessibility focus to the
validation of disability culture and self. The movement also achieved policy changes such as the
Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act to enhance the lives of disabled
people.
In line with the national-level advocacy, other forms of advocacy improved across Europe with
some of the common regional goals including; inclusive education. The Nordic countries were
also early initiators of collective solutions for changing the focus of disability services from
institutional to community-based. Three decades later, adoption of the United Nations
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ushered unparalleled multilateralism in the
area of disability rights and consequent supervision. It was further agreed that each of the
signatories to the treaty would ensure that their domestic legislation is compliant with the treaty.
Disabled people’s organizations and local grassroot organization perform core functions of
presenting the various local concerns and agenda. It tends to lead to more policy action because
it is grounded in real situations, and the involved groups are mobilized. For example, disabled
activists within the Global South have endeavored to problematize the limitations of mainstream
Westernization-oriented disability rights discourses. Debates to initiate discussions on the
P a g e | 24
disabling impacts of poverty, conflicts, the absence of infrastructures and colonialism are others
which seeks to expand the discourses in mainstream society.
a. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities which was passed in
the year 2006 forms part of major international documents that seek to reaffirm basic human
rights for persons with disabilities all over the world, this convention has been negotiated mainly
and to a significant extent in the course of recent decades due to the increasing activism of cross-
national disability movements, and has bound 163 nation state signatories to date. Disabled
persons’ groups globally have progressively mobilized, calling on governments to legally
enshrine rights responding to historical prejudice against, exclusion of, and violence against
persons with disabilities, among others. Nations in turn should strive to ensure domestic laws
align commitment to support the persons living with disabilities in fully exercising the right of
civil citizenship on equal basis. The articles selected within the disability convention recognize
domains essential in society that equity measures must address: built environment and
information, legal capacity and recognition, justice, personal transport, health, rehabilitation,
education, and employment. The monitoring of implementation remains within the honorary
jurisdiction of the expert committee who regularly review state reports, and inquire into alleged
infringement. The first specialized international human rights instrument developed is the
instrument with a unique strong involvement of the organizations that represent persons with
disabilities. Prior did not have voice crafting authoritative standards directly pertaining to.
Finally, conventions ensure success where there is active social movement energy for its
continuation, press states once ratified. Disability advocacy worldwide is grassroots thus it is
crucial sustaining these conventions influence through grassroots activism locally nationally
P a g e | 25
globally helping committee member influence deliberations confront policymakers when hearing
rulings to determine if not enough progress has been made to uphold these universally accepted
disablement-based protections. Continued pressure from below on government duty bearers is
therefore necessary so that these milestones can translate codified principles into substantive
changes in the lives of disabled citizens all over the world The treaty regime serious-minded
countries should adopt should honor the basic human dignity of all disabled citizens irrespective
of the nature of their impairment.
b. European disability rights movement
The European disability rights movement can be traced back to the 1970s, and its genesis is
associated with the civil rights movement that occurred in the United States. In several European
countries, groups of people with disabilities started to form associations to demand equal rights
and equal opportunities for everyone. The first ten years of activism related to architectural
barriers encompassed concerns such as: easy access to means of transportation and public
facilities, right to education, and the process of deinstitutionalization. New associations were
established, for example the European Disability Forum, which acted as a center for Disability
Rights Activists in Europe.
The movement had landmark achievements registered in the later part of the twentieth century.
After reading news articles and watching videos of demonstrations by disabled persons and
pressure groups, anti-discrimination laws were passed in some European nations from the early
1990s. The social model of disability was developed by disabled activists and scholars and which
viewed disability as a product of prejudice and structures that treated individuals with
impairments as less deserving of reasonable accommodation than members of other minority
groups. The physical accessibility of the built environment was increased, advancements in
P a g e | 26
assistive technology occurred, and the progress toward integration of individuals with disabilities
into education was made.
Persisting challenges remain. Prejudices are still present, and it is worrying that some countries
are currently experiencing high rates of hate crime targeting disabled persons. The remaining
barriers in employment, health care access, and income support schemes, among others, still
render many disabled individuals unable to fully integrate into society. Continual austerity
politics have affected disability services and financial supports in several European countries
with a higher degree of intensity.
There is still European disability activism taking place at the national and regional scales, as well
as connections with the International Disability Rights Movement. Campaigns go on, the issues
remain, to name just several: legal capacity, community living, employment quotas, shut-down
of segregated institutions and schools. Social media helped fuel more activism allowing for de-
centralized youth-led demonstrations against enduring oppression. It is posited that overarching
progress in European states is a lopsided affair due to ideological inclination. The disability
movement in Europe also goes on changing in its struggle for rights, participation, and barrier-
free environment.
c. Disability activism in developing countries
The major challenges experienced by disability activism in developing countries include
insufficient funds, this is because there is low sensitization of the public, and inadequate support
from the governments. These nations’ disabled persons seek for visibility, access, medical,
education, and employment rights. Social stigma and discrimination the other are other barriers
P a g e | 27
that contribute to the barriers result, however, the advocacy for disabled citizens’ rights has
increasingly been Lionel cited in the last couple of decades.
Special interest organizations petition government decision makers to consider the needs and
rights of disabled people and they highlight areas of high unmet demand, both stress how
developments for the disabled are beneficial to society as well. The idea is to raise the awareness
of disabled citizens, and eliminate prejudice through the use of campaigns. Advocates use global
structures, for example, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities to exert outside influence on governments. They also partner at regional levels to
transform strategies into policies and thus amplify their power.
Substantive activism concerns itself with the barrier free access that is still severely lacking in
the developing world’s common places thus severely limiting the participation of the
disabled. Campaigns also act as lobby groups by demanding changes on policies on social
justice, health, education, skills training and employment privileges for disabled persons. The
strategies employed by activists include; Media, Technology, Demonstrations and Legal
approaches in order to gain the public sympathy and change policies. However, among all the
available resource constraints, limited funding raises the most concern.
Despite the signs of increased activity, much remains to be done for the recognition and the
respect of the rights and the dignity of all disabled citizens. Grassroot organization play
significant roles in the leadership of disability movements within the developing countries,
however, the work of such figures may call for more fundamental transformations in government
and public perception. To support this, the disability community itself must come to terms with
the divisions that are based on class, gender, ethnicity, as well as different types of impairments,
P a g e | 28
in order to be unified. In general, one can conclude that disability activism has significant
shortcomings in developing countries but at the same time, it is a movement that has the
potential to bring about a lot of change.
d. International disability organizations
In the international systems, organizations of persons with disabilities have been at the forefront
in promoting the rights of people with disabilities. Some organizations such as Disabled Peoples’
International formed in 1981 and Inclusion International formerly known as the International
League of Societies for Persons with Mental Handicap formed in 1963 are member of the United
Nations and were involved in drafting of strategies, standards and laws on Disability main goal
of which is to ensure the disabled have equal rights to the rest of the society. They have
endeavored to change attitudes and implement change through interventions with governments,
research, awareness creation and support of persons with disabilities.
For years disabled persons’ rights have been advocated and defended by international disability
organizations against discrimination and human rights violations, they have claimed that they
have a right to be treated as equal citizens in healthcare, education, employment, and in political
sectors. They have fought to prevent the institutionalization and isolation of the disabled while
demanding higher care in the community. Meanwhile, continual campaigns like Disability Rights
Now initiated in 2006 ensured that the UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities
translated into tangible national level action. Global and regional organizations that were formed
in 1999 like the International Disability Alliance enabled better cooperation and synchronization
in order to achieve common goals.
P a g e | 29
Disabled people’s organizations for the first time brought the idea of disabled persons into
policy-making at the international level, these theories disseminated the social model of
disability and recognized disability as a human rights agenda. The latter replaced the medical
model by arguing that disability was a flaw present in each person and that there were external
sources of oppression and oppression that prevented disabled people from having access to their
own communities. They introduced the slogan “Nothing About Us, Without Us” and addressed
the self-determination of the disabled people. Despite this, they relentlessly campaigned for the
abandonment of the ableist presumption as well as the recognition of disability as a form of
diversity.
e. Cross-cultural approaches to disability advocacy
Disability advocacy can therefore be defined as the process through which individuals with
disabilities as well as other people support the rights of, and fight for, the disabled across the
globe. Multidisciplinary models accept the fact that, as much as persons with disability are
discriminated and excluded across the world, forms of discrimination vary from one culture to
the other. Scholars insist on the need for contextualization of practices because frequently the
transplanted paradigms weakly reflect the interactions between culture, environment, politics,
and economy that influence disability experiences in the area.
For instance, while campaigning developed progressively in the global North and the South, it
went through different trajectories. It is also important to note that initial movements in the North
centered on equal civil rights through legislation, which later shifted to the independent living
paradigm. But legislatively-based imports were inadequate when poverty, conflicts, endearing
cultures created larger hurdles. Therefore, Southern movements focused on building community-
level formations that emphasized economic issues. There were also dissimilarities related to
P a g e | 30
identities: Northern activists redefining disability as a social construct incompatible with
tradition in many Southern societies.
Some movements themselves appeared differently – many of the Southern ones being started by
family organizations which offered support services. Cooperation with governments and non-
governmental organizations looks as a key component of Southern beginnings versus sharp self-
advocacy strategies that were typical for the Northern advocacy origins. Forming alliances with
women’s, indigenous, labor groups is shown to have moved Southern agendas forward since
injustice is compounded by the intersections of oppression. There seem to be fewer of them
recently in more bureaucratized and technocratized movements of the North.
Similarly, concepts of discrimination are also different; while, inclusion and exclusion from
Northern societies conflict with the ideas of interdependence and dependency prevalent in
Southern societies. That is, personal encounters of stigma and internalization of stigma result in
different experiences as well. Thus, while all advocacy requires an understanding of these
particular sociocultural forces that render people with disabilities as second-class citizens,
effective advocacy needs to further break down these forces into actionable local solutions. On
one hand, globalization shares the Northern discourse on disability and rights, which activists
increasingly find problematic, as the global message erases difference and shifts focus from the
experience of disabled people.
5. CONTEMPORARY ISSUES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Disabled people’s movements have been instrumental in the progress towards obtaining rights
for persons with disability; the independent living movement of the 1970s for personalized
independence, and the neurodiversity movement of the new millennium for acceptance and
P a g e | 31
assistance for those with neurological variation. Thus, the role of social movements for disability
is to progress and sustain their work to respond to existing and new challenges of the disability
population.
Given the current rate of technological advancement, there is need to address this question of fair
distribution of devices that can help persons with disabilities to live more independently and with
much improved quality. These circles extended pressure on the development of ideas such as the
universal design by ensuring it was a point from the onset and not a mere addendum, it is also
important to raise a question on whether such technologies as AI or genetic engineering can open
opportunities for disabled people or pose questionable ethical questions as to who is considered
the focus of major discussions. Neither traditions nor institutions maintain these complicated,
cutting-edge issues in the public sphere; movements do.
Various systematic disparities such as in employment, health care and education are still present
in different societies and they require constant advocacy to remove the hindrances and gaps.
Grass-root mobilization and protest demonstrate society’s consciousness of structural ableism
and the existence of self-generated barriers that are difficult to eliminate, as well as persistently
pushing power wielders to enforce the anti- discrimination laws. One such imperative for future
work is to address social inclusion of disability communities which have been more
marginalized.
As society remains engaged in a process of political polarization from middle-left to middle-right
in an increasingly globalized world, disability movements represent the contrary of a united front
to defend the human rights and dignity of disabled people, by uniting everybody along the
current breakdowns of belonging, knowledge, and location, the activists reveal the connection of
P a g e | 32
all people to each other and to disease and accidents. Beginning with care and compassion,
disability social movements offer a way to re-imagine justice premised on our shared humanness.
a. Digital activism and social media
Digital activism accompanied with the help of social media is the significant change in the
modern age of people’s activism and protest actions. Social movements and activist campaigns
are now more common through use of technology, which helps in mobilization, sharing of
information, fundraising, and even the coordinating of protests both physically and virtually. The
global protests against racism, climate change, neoliberalism’s economic measures, and
authoritarianism in the past few years emerged widely through networked publics and social
media activism.
While the new media includes blogging sites like Twitter, face book, and You tube as well as the
ones that support the leaderless, horizontal structures of the digitally networked movements and
the encrypted messages to support communication. Hashtags collect conversations into shared
physical environments, increase exposure for causes, and enable participation by people from
disparate locations. Social media supports “connective action” which is based on the sharing of
information to raise awareness and is underpinned by new structures of engagement as distinct
from earlier ones that depended on formal organizations to mobilize resources, these barriers
allow people who were once unable to participate in the public conversation a louder voice to
contest the narrative and change the status quo.
Questions arise on the price that is paid for the convenience of digital involvement in terms of
clicktivism and slacktivism The critics argue that the platforms break down commitment into
single actions and which weakens the necessary unity and coherence of change. It is also
P a g e | 33
important to highlight the contradictory nature of platforms that are used for empowering
democratic processes on one hand, and for spreading fake news by some sinister individuals on
the other. As with any form of digital activism, there are ongoing questions about how to
cultivate constructive conversations in public spaces and address antidemocratic actors who
leverage social media platforms that prioritize engagement and growth over the health of society
as it becomes increasingly fragmented and suspicious of the media. Constant regulatory concerns
are centered around improvements to reduce the negative effects put in place with social media’s
live, machine-assisted anger storm.
b. Intersectionality in disability movements
The intersectionality perspective therefore highlights the significance of examining the complex
nature of the multiple aspects in parallel rather than in isolation. Disability justice activists more
frequently use this perspective while more discussion about interlocking systems remains
needed. Nevertheless, disabled individual of color, immigrants, LGBTQ continue to face
marginalization and exclusion from mainstream disability rights activism as a result of colorism,
racism within disabilities movements.
Embracing disability rights, the concept of independent living, and neurodiversity originate from
white, Western, middle-class standards; This is why scholars argue that it is necessary to question
the foundational beliefs of the dominant disability frameworks. Focusing on the input of
previously excluded narratives would invite the reconsideration of ‘access,’ ‘reasonability,’ and
‘policies’ through diverse lenses. For example, the question campaigns for rights to access
restaurants, shopping malls when large disabled populations have difficulties in meeting basic
survival needs such as poverty, lack of health care, police brutality or deportation threats. Firstly,
P a g e | 34
priorities seem completely different based on the Lines of Advantage, emphasizing on the need
to acknowledge the different perspectives.
Fixed subject-identity models do not reflect dynamic and multifaceted processes of impairment
and health. Consumers with chronic diseases deny the medical labels written without their input,
challenging the discourses of victimization. Discussions of this kind may indicate the need to
refine the idea of disability at least, and broaden the concerns beyond the
mobility/sensory/intellectual impairments towards the invisible, marginalized, and marginalized
physical and mental states. Academics suggest that more theoretically and empirically conducted
research would further advance knowledge about emerging identity forms and promote identity
coalition.
Globalization of disability rights rhetoric pumped mainly by legal processes and United Nations
conventions is criticized for erasing and de-politicizing diverse struggles of disability movements
across the globe. Western NGOs are criticized for reestablishing the colonial power structures
when interacting with their counterparts in the Global South. While conventions cannot be said
to be perfect, conventions provide leverage to pressure states on institutional exclusion. Swartz
(2008) had probably avoided the dangers of strategic management if he had engaged in reflective
critique in parallel to engaging in strategy. Disability justice inherently entails the disruption in
the dominant or conventional paradigms. The fundamental problem still persists in creating
spaces where the marginalized are raised to shift oppressive structures rather than claiming rights
in systems that are already designed to limit who may succeed for various people. The way
forward equally calls for complexity, self/interval/other-awareness, polyvocality.
P a g e | 35
c. Emerging issues (e.g., bioethics, AI)
One new and rapidly evolving area is artificial intelligence and robotics, genetics, and neuro-
technologies that pose new and interesting ethical questions relating to disability. Bioethicists
continue to discuss what is permissible and what is not about human enhancement technologies
and what is treatment and what is enhancement for the disabled. Technologies that suggest they
work to ‘cure’ disability, such as cochlear implants for deafness, or drugs stimulating cognition
for paralysis, are commonly opposed in disability cultures. There is a marked difference of
opinion between the disability rights and disability technology in regards to the usage of
technologies to eradicate disabilities; some embrace disability pride and are against the medical
model of disability, on the other hand, some would like to preserve the technological choices.
Discussions arise when techniques in prenatal genetic testing are used to detect fetal disabilities;
ethical consideration for parents who choose to selectively terminate pregnancies ensues. As
advancement in AI and robotic systems continues to advance with implementation in several
sectors such as healthcare, education and employment, concerns over accessibility for disabled
end-users and the rights to privacy emerges. The introduction of ‘smart’ AI technologies in cities
and buildings also presents concern for disabled people. Uses of virtual, augmented and mixed
reality tools also add fuel to discussions surrounding the implementation of the virtue ethics with
references to disability in immersive environments. Digital tracking mechanisms in the form of
different data collection methods, wearable devices, and tracking applications raise privacy
concerns for people with disabilities. Bioethicists deliberate on how as the technologies run
through the human bodies, minds, and activities, perceptions of normalcy over disability
evolve. As technological changes increase, activists working with disability call for timely
regulation of the technology despite acknowledging that it has both positive and negative
impacts on the rights of persons with disability. Disability communities set high expectations
P a g e | 36
from technologies that would help them gain access and comparatively control their lives while
at the same time being deeply worried that technology solidifies their status as ‘other’ and
dehumanized.
d. Youth-led disability activism
There is an emerging group of youths with disabilities who are at the forefront of advocating for
and enhancing disability rights in the global society. The current generation of youth disability
activists who have been born and raised into the internet age have adapted social media and
technology in the different ways by using it for awareness creation, networking, calling for
action, and social change. Some of the areas outlined by young disabled persons include
inadequate physical access with buildings especially schools, workplaces and public buildings
and facility; and cultural prejudice/ discrimination against disability. For example, the disabled
youth organizations from different countries start advocacy campaigns on social networks using
hashtags, videos, petitions and widely used image quotes. Through the use of such extensively
shared technology platforms, they can post and spread far and wide counter-messages that
democratize societies and unmask ableism.
Notably, youth disability activists are demanding that they are given an opportunity to represent
themselves – ‘nothing about us without us.’ This is in response to tokenism where disabled
youths are given an opportunity to contribute but in an insignificant way; they are demanding
that disabled youths should actually be involved in policy/decision-making processes within their
local and national institutions on issues to do with disability. Several evidences bring some hope
of their ability to foster a youth-led solutions such as, mobile application that offers supportive
tools for education, employment and social engagement. As for the future work, it is still
important to continue helping young people with disabilities become leaders. This requires
P a g e | 37
capacities for advocacy, networking, engagement in public speaking and media amongst others
to be built. It also involves deliberate efforts to change the culture within disability activist
communities by ensuring that these communities deliberately seek, empower and promote voices
of other oppressed groups including women, ethnic minorities, and poor youths. The new
generations who have grown through technology herald the prospect of awakening human rights
to push for rectification of past wrongs and advance progressive change to deliver disability
justice around the world.
e. Challenges and opportunities for future advocacy
