P a g e | 1
DISABILITY RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
1. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Disability rights as human rights are not that new in the annals of social justice and political
reforms. It is sad to note that for most of recorded history, people with disability were
discriminated against, oppressed and locked out from mainstream society. Sometimes they were
not allowed to join the society, sometimes they were placed in institutions or were just locked
away. People from different parts of the world started developing positive attitudes towards
persons with disabilities during the Enlightenment period as the earliest stirrings or call for
change in the way persons with disabilities are treated and the fight for some of their rights,
although were very limited at that time. However, a more international framework of human
rights which persons with disability and their advocates could build upon to further campaigns
for equal rights and integration only emerged after the Second World War and the formation of
the United Nations. The two main pillars were the adoption of the 1948 Universal Declaration of
Human Rights that enshrined the basic freedoms and rights of all human beings irrespective of
status and the rise of the international disability rights advocacy that commenced in the 1960s
and the 1970s. Disabled actors employed the force of the Declaration to condemn an oppressive
policy regime and to challenge governments about the integration of disability rights into law
and policy.
The advocacy received success with a resolution of a declaration on the rights of disabled
persons in 1975. But it was advisory and couched in terms of health, the relief of suffering and
the advancement of social morality rather than the enfranchisement of women and the expansion
of civil-political liberties. The real turning point could be considered the 2006 Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities being the first human rights treaty that provided legally
P a g e | 2
binding obligations to protect the rights of the disabled. It adopted the social model of disability
and provided policies and provisions across all spheres of life where people with disability are
supposed to have equal opportunities and are supposed to have an option to be independent, non-
discrimination and elimination of prejudice against people with disability. The CRPD established
disability in the separate agenda of universal human rights instead of in the domain of health,
charitable or welfare. One innovative concept was its empowering model that incorporated civil-
political liberties together with economic-social statuses. Another significant difference that the
CRPD possesses and prior declarations lacked is an implementation mechanism, currently, more
than 180 countries have ratified the treaty which could be viewed as evidence of the global
consensus even in the cases when certain states have not shown much enthusiasm when ratifying
other human rights treaties. The CRPD offered disability advocates everywhere practical, rights-
based legal frameworks with which to lobby governments for change, and monitor compliance, it
marked a significant achievement in entrenching disability rights as a fundamental human rights
principle in international law.
a. Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights UDHR is commonly referred to as the world’s most
basic document as it was formulated by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on the
10th of December 1948, as a result of world-war II. The UDHR is the first instrument which
enunciates the principles of human rights protection in a complete and universal manner. This
one declares the rights of everyone in the world that are civil, political, economic, social, and
cultural. The UDHR was developed by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights
presided over by former first lady of US Eleanor Roosevelt through two years of extensive
debates involving participation of representatives from different parts of the world and with
P a g e | 3
variety of cultures and political beliefs. It is far from being perfect and it is one which
harmoniously balances out different political stances at the dawn of the Cold War period and
contribution from various legal systems and beliefs in religion. This significant and influential
concept defines the basic level of human rights that should be provided to people irrespective of
their nationality or origin, it can therefore be said that the adoption of the declaration was a major
milestone in the promotion of human rights around the world.
As for the former, it should be noted that the UDHR is not itself a legally binding document but
an ethical document whose impact over the years has been nothing short of astounding. Some of
its key provisions has been affirmed by international agreement evidenced by their inclusion in
subsequent binding human rights instruments, this has ensured the setting of its principles as a
legal precedent, under international custom law. The Declaration has also been used as a
reference point and has influenced various sovereign state’s national constitution bills of rights
and human rights regimes; besides, it provides the bases for the United Nations human rights
system. It has transformed its basic principles into what is considered the standard code of
conduct that the world’s countries should adhere to.
Today the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the most translated text in the world, it is
translated into more than 500 languages. Despite these persisting issues and contentious debates
about the role of its values within different societies, the powerful call to freedom, equality, and
brotherhood is still heard by people of all nations around the world today. The Declaration is
therefore a historic step in the fight for human dignity and as such offers a glimmer of legal
redress for millions of people’s whose rights and freedoms remain violated or ignored.
P a g e | 4
b. International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights
The United Nations general assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in
1948 that outlines a broad of civil liberties that should be protected globally, however, the
Declaration was not legally enforceable and only acted as an announcement of the formation of
the United Nations. Attempts were being made in order to codify international legally binding
treaties on human rights, consequently, the UN Commission on Human Rights and the General
Assembly developed two separate but related international covenants on human rights.Two main
treaties that have international human rights norms are the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights (ICESCR). These Covenants were under construction since 1954 to draft the necessary
improvement. They sought to provide legal recognition of rights that were enumerated in the
UDHR.
The ICCPR was signed in 1966 and formally came into force in 1976 when thirty-five nations
had ratified it, with civil and political rights as its major area of concern. Since the adoption of
ICCPR, over 170 states have committed to legally binding standards contained in ICCPR, hence,
acceptance is high internationally. It binds Governments to protect and fulfill civil and political
rights some of which include the right to life, freedom of religion, expression, association, and
the right to a fair trial among others. Among measures that go to ensure compliance with ICCPR,
an independent Human Rights Committee scrutinizes ratified reports from State parties outlining
measures taken to discharge obligations. However, the Committee composed of independent
person can receive complaints from individuals against governments for violation of rights under
the ICCPR through an Optional Protocol after the domestic remedies are directed. Thus, the
ICCPR set out clear international Legal norms and enforcement procedures governing civil and
P a g e | 5
political human rights. From the ratification and oversight process of this convention, it
immensely supported the promotion of these basic freedoms in the entire world.
c. Evolution of specific rights (e.g., women's rights, children's rights)
The development of particular rights like the women’s and children’s rights is observed to have
significant strides in the historical progression of the human rights. The early human rights
instruments equally did not include some of these or were ambiguous on the protection of these
categories of persons. Nonetheless, there were efforts made by activists for the enlargement of
such rights to the basic ones for everybody. The women’s rights movement was spurred by a heft
event such as the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848. Some of the pioneers include Elizabeth Cady
Stanton, Susan B. Anthony advocating for female suffrage and education, their Dedication
changed attitudes toward gender assignments. Likewise other child advocacy such as Eglantyne
Jebb publicized the issues of deprivations that children in Europe were subjected to after the
World War One. She was able to secure a declaration of ‘The Rights of the Child’ that was held
in Geneva in 1924 which included support duties that adults have towards children. They helped
to set the stage for the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child that upheld civil,
political, economic, social and cultural rights of children. It is the first human rights treaty which
has been ratified by the largest number of parties, to be precise 196. Both movements were
however confronted with setbacks but they had to overcome the odds through fight. Their
victories meant the reinforcement of human rights globally making sure that the laws and other
systems of governance were expanded to cover all people, regardless of gender or age. Today, it
is evident through the rights of both women and men to vote in developed countries, health,
education and the ability to work and be financially independent in the developed nations are
some of the achievements that women enjoy today due to the struggles of these women, current
P a g e | 6
abuse of women and children in conflict areas and other developing contexts show that there is
still more work to be done to attain the full recognition of women as equal human beings with
equal rights. However, sustained engagement flow from the progressive challenges posed by the
long-standing struggle for human dignity marked by the heroism of many activists. It is for this
reason that their achievements continue to pave the way in the fight for equality, opportunity, and
basic human respect for the sexes, aged and all people regardless of class. It is now up to the
younger and future generations to take up this mantle and continue this mission.
d. Emergence of disability as a human rights issue
Persons with disabilities, in the past, have been violated, discriminated against and excluded
from equal human rights. They got many rights violated they included institutionalization, forced
sterilization, denial of education and employment, the attitudes portray them as a drain on the
society instead of embracing them as equal citizens with rights. It was in the 20th century that
disability rights advocacy started to emerge and this was when the change started, there are
criticisms that the fight was taken by activists with disabilities who redefined it as a matter of
human rights and access to society.
Some of the main developments that took place during this period include the establishment of
cross disability rights organizations such as Disabled Peoples International in 1981, such groups
helped raise awareness about abuse of rights of disabled persons and provided a collective voice
to the disability community through which it could demand change. This occurred at around the
same time as the attempts to pass the legal measures to protect the rights of disabled persons, the
first international legal instrument that dealt with the rights of disabled persons was the UN
Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons adopted in 1975, but it was not binding. Far-
P a g e | 7
reaching was the legislation of Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990. It introduced high levels
of affirmative protections and barrier-free access, which it later developed into a legal prototype
at the global level.
This was followed by slow realization that there was no sufficient protection of disabled persons
rights due to lack of provisions within the existing human rights instruments. The main human
rights covenants that had been signed prior to 2006 either accorded disability little recognition or
did not mention it at all. The disability rights advocacy ensured that general civil rights weren’t
adequate when equal citizenship demanded personal adjustments as well as access
provisions. This advocacy resulted in the preparation of the United Nations Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2006, it was the first of the UN human rights treaties of the
century that had binding power. On issues of disability, the convention adopts a social model and
human rights approach to the issues with a declaration that access and participation are human
rights. It has almost all states as parties indicating that this topic which was once ignored has
now gained approval of the international community.
e. Shift from medical to social model of disability
This model of disability perceives the disability as a flaw within the human person who requires
medical intervention to be rectified or corrected. This approach was the most practiced in
policymaking and perceptions towards disabled people for a greater part of modern history. On
the other hand, the social model which was championed in the 1960 and the 1970s was a
revolution one. Disability rights proponents said that disability comes from the model of the
society that imposes a lot of limitations on disabled people. The social model of disability is
P a g e | 8
based on the understanding of this concept as a set of limitations resulting from the absence of
facilities in society and the environment rather than at the individual level of the person.
The advent of the social model, therefore, signified a transition within the theoretical framework
in the area of disability rights within human rights domain. Earlier, the burden was on the
disabled person himself to transform or undo his disability in order to be included in society. The
social model identified the role of society and structures of power to address dis/ability in
relation to access and inclusion. This was parallel with the evolving nature of human rights from
the first generation civil and political rights to second generation economic, social and cultural
rights. The social model reflected the change to focus on attributing individual prejudice and
systemic prejudice differently and to realizing that everyone shared the responsibility to tackle
prejudice and discrimination that was inherent in society.
It was thus through the voices of disabled activists and scholars demanding to take charge of
policies and interventional measures in their lives that the medical-sociopolitical model shift was
effected. It was initiated in the 1960s and 1970s, and became influential following the other civil
rights movements indicating a shift towards rights-based models which empowered disabled
people as active subjects demanding their rights. By demanding ‘Nothing about us without us’
the group came up with an ideal that captures their call for autonomy. Therefore, the rise of the
social model could also be seen as continuing the gradual shift in the way disability was
understood, while also being a sign of the emergence of new social movements and the adoption
of rights-based approaches, they have also continued to impact disability policy and advocacy up
to the current generation.
P a g e | 9
2. KEY INTERNATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities signed in 2006 is the first human
rights treaty on disability, which define legal requirements and communique on the inherent
worth of the disabled persons. Elements including provisions against discrimination, access and
accommodation, rights to education, health, work and employment, habilitation as well as
rehabilitation qualifies the framework as comprehensive and this covers civil, political,
economic, social and cultural domains. System of organs includes Committee which reviews the
State’s report and provides recommendations, performs the role of the international standard-
setting treaty body and directs the implementation legislation, policies and programs around the
world. Standard Rules on Equalization of Opportunities before 1981 International Year of
Disabled Persons and 1983-1992 UN Decade of Disabled Persons is one of the crucial non-
legally binding document to shape internationally recognized ideas and principles for the rights
of persons with disabilities. In concert with women’s rights, the 1990s advocacy contributed to
the issuance by Canadian delegation of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination
Against Women of general recommendation on multiple discrimination experienced by disabled
women and girls. The regional initiatives like the 2006 Arab Decade of Disabled Persons and
African Decade of Persons with Disabilities and among others bring forward the continental
action plans that translate the global human rights standards in to the regional frameworks and
realities. Appealing to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda through references of
disability mainstreaming, and a new goal on inclusion, global awareness of development
disabilities’ connection seems to be enhanced. Moving forward, concerted attention is needed
with States, UN agencies, civil society and organizations of persons with disabilities to translate
the aspirations of treaty bodies and policy documents into tangible betterment resulting in the
P a g e | 10
transformation of on-paper promises into equality in substance and human rights enhancing the
lives of people globally.
a. UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, adopted in 2006, is recognized as
one of the most important human rights documents that cover persons with disabilities on the
international level. Being an international legally binding instrument of human rights, the CRPD
seeks to ensure and protect the rights and worth of PWDs. One of the goals is to guarantee
human rights and fundamental freedoms to persons with disabilities as in any other members of
society. Basic voting and fundamental rights, including access, mobility, health care, education,
employment and occupation, support for personal assistance, political and MPs’ activity and
rights for disabled people, and non-discrimination and equality. Supervisory mechanism of
implementing is the CRPD Committee, while the Optional Protocol will enable persons to lodge
complaints of violations. It has also been signed and ratified by 182 countries to date, which
make it one of the most universal and the most rapidly ratified human rights convention of the
United Nations. It is a great change from disability as a purely social problem that needs to be
taken care of and managed to disability as human rights matter that entails limitation and
prejudice which hinders chances for equal opportunities. The CRPD strengthened earlier
obligations in the sphere of the rights of persons with disabilities, which were outlined at the
international level, and the Standard Rules on Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with
Disabilities adopted in 1993. Nevertheless, the Rules were not legally enforceable even though
the 22 points which comprise the document provide a clear and exhaustive framework of
disability policy. Therefore, the later legally binding CRPD was needed to facilitate the inclusion
and address discriminative measures. In sum, it is believed that the CRPD plays a role in
P a g e | 11
encouraging the national legislation and policy changes Globally to protect the rights in the
context of all areas of life changing the attitudes and promoting the persons with disabilities as
rights holders who can demand the rights within the framework of the CRPD.
b. Optional Protocol to the CRPD
The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities provides that,
an individual or group of individuals may communicate grievances in relation to the violation of
the rights enshrined in the Convention to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities, thus, it provides for an individual complaint mechanism for the Convention similar
to those established under the other nine CIHRTs. Optional Protocol sought to make
implementation of the convention more effective and offer redress at the international level
where domestic remedies are exhausted. It is accepted by the States that are parties to the
Optional Protocol that the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has the power to
consider the communications submitted by or for individuals and groups of individuals under the
jurisdiction of the State Party concerned who have a case that they consider to be violation of the
Convention by that State Party. Any communication shall not be considered by the Committee if
it concerns a State Party of the Convention which is not party to the Optional Protocol. When the
Committee obtains credible information that a State party has committed serious or recurrent
rights violation(s) under the Convention, the Committee shall invite the State party to contribute
towards the assessment of the information provided and submit its observations. Based on any
observation made during the consideration of the report by the State Party concerned, as well as
any other information that is available, the committee may decide to appoint one or more
members of the committee as a special investigator and report back to the committee. The
injunction, however, is that the inquiry may require the permission of the State Party to proceed
P a g e | 12
to its territory. The Committee will then make a request for findings from such an inquiry, and
after considering the findings, send recommendations to the State Party in question with any
comment that the State Party may wish to make. The Optional Protocol aids in enhancing the
implementation of the covenant and seeks to address wrong done to persons with disabilities.
c. Regional conventions and treaties
National and regional conventions and treaties fill in the gaps of the general principles outlined
in instruments like the CRPD. The African continent has the most developed regional
architecture that guarantees disability rights and links engagement with CRPD
responsibilities. The Africa Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights also prohibits discrimination
in a number of aspects of the African Charter, including disability. Explaining the African
Commission guidelines to CRPD to the member states of the African Union that acceded to the
CRPD and committed to its implementation at the domestic levels are provided in the 2007
guidelines. Referring to disability-focused protections, the 2009 Draft Protocol to the African
Charter aims at affirmative African governments to pass non-discrimination laws, remove
obstacles that deprive them of rights of persons with disabilities and to take socioeconomic
policy interventions for their full integration.
Other RECs also indicate an emerging trend of upholding the rights of persons with disabilities.
The Organization of American States 1999 Inter-American Convention is based on principles of
equality and dignity of the persons with disabilities. Parties also pledge to work in a phased
manner to ensure the accessibility standards and equality provisions that would be in accordance
with United Nations. The 2000 Charter of Fundamental Rights by Organization of African Unity
outlines rights of elderly, disabled; which require legislative administrative measures to reform to
enable enjoyment of rights, integration /participation in social life and dealing with impediments
P a g e | 13
to the achievement of the objectives mentioned. Most importantly, the Arab Decade for Persons
with Disabilities 2007 signified single focused priority by the Middle East and North African
governments to disability issues hence yielding to domestic legislative policy changes on
inclusion and accessibility.
While regional treaties may not have been ratified by all states, they can accumulate interstate
commitments since geographic affinity ensures the sharing of information and technical assets in
the realization of human rights standards by regional blocs catalyzing domestic action. It also
enables the disability rights advocacy groups to report on the implementation to the oversight
bodies thus bridging the gap between the formulation of rights to concrete outcomes. Therefore,
they play the role of important middlemen and impart the general principles of Universal Human
Rights in localized contexts.
d. ILO conventions on disability and employment
The International Labor Organization has taken some measures in relation to conventions that
seeks to ensure that persons with disabilities are provided with equal employment opportunity
and treatment, a major instrument is the ILO’s 1983 Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment
(Disabled Persons) Convention which oblige state parties to design services in vocational
rehabilitation to enable the disabled to gain employment. This entails making positive action to
ensure that the disabled persons are placed in occupations; this involves quotas, reserved
occupations, granting of funds to employers, vocational training and guidance.
Furthermore, the Convention on Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) by the
International Labor Organization-ILO in 1958 banned discrimination in employment, including
disability. The following R111 Recommendation includes requests of reasonable
P a g e | 14
accommodations in aspects of vocation trainings, jobs and workplaces, these principles are the
non-discrimination principle and the principle of full participation and inclusion of disabled
persons in society, among others. Harmonizing ILO conventions with other disability rights
frameworks including the UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities becomes
crucial. As for the employment rights of disabled persons, the CRPD’s Article 27 outlines the
principle of employment “on an equal basis with others”. It enshrines the rights of disabled
persons by compelling states to guarantee necessary support and accommodation to disabled
employment seekers. The CRPD committee has highlighted a need for States to eliminate legal,
physical, communication, and other barriers that prevent disabled persons to access open labor
markets. Employment policies for disability and incentive for employer in private sector should
also be implemented as stated under the Convention. Thus, mainstreaming disability into Decent
Work Agendas is also highlighted.
Though the process is continuous through ILO conventions and UN instruments, disabled
persons still struggle to encounter numerous challenges getting into labor markets. There exists a
challenge on unemployment and high economic inactivity across countries regardless of the
country income level. Equity measures such as compulsory affirmative action have their
drawbacks where there are still taste barriers in workplaces. Studies show that despite the need
for a fuller implementation of the human rights approach, in many cases, components beyond
legislation and awareness generation remain unmet. In this respect, the promotion of the
principle of equal treatment for disabled persons in gaining decent work also requires
restrengthened policy and practical measures from governments and their social partners.
P a g e | 15
e. World Health Organization initiatives
The World Health Organization WHO has embarked on several efforts to advance the rights of
the disabled individuals in the world. One of the major drives was the release of the World
Report on Disability in 2011. On disability matters this report offered detailed information and
made suggestions where it urged governments and civil society to tackle challenges faced by
persons with disability. Additionally, the WHO Action Plan 2014-2021: Better Health for Persons
with Disabilities described goals and steps to provide a fair chance of receiving health treatment.
Some of the areas of total focus are to enhance service delivery, to design programs to be
implemented for specific groups of targeted disabled population such as women and children
with disabilities, to increase on community-based rehabilitation, to establish disability data base
and to train health care providers.
Other significant WHO documents contributing to the promotion of disability rights include
International Classifications which provide policy, data and standard setting frameworks. The
ICF-2001 introduced the changes of outlook from the medical model of disability to the interface
between the components of health, functioning, disability, and factors. Likewise, the new
International Classification of Health Interventions launched in 2019 is intended for the
categorization of health interventions including disability interventions to support service
development and delivery.
Apart from the production of publications and frameworks, WHO can also provide technical
assistance, partner and host meetings for countries and regions. An example is the presidency of
the Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology for an enhanced access at the
moment. Moreover, in 2018, the WHO partnered to convene the Global Disability Summit to
engage leaders to make national commitments to improve inclusion. With participants totaling
P a g e | 16
more than 100 in form including governments and disabled persons organizations, the Summit
produced commitments in areas of focuses such as data gather, policy change, access to
technologies, humanitarian response, as well as employment. Therefore, a comprehensive picture
of the extent of WHO influence on the global disability rights agenda can be best demonstrated
through research, guidelines, and partnerships. Nevertheless, there are still significant hurdles to
cross and its action plans offer structured forms of country and organizational response
mechanisms.
3. CORE PRINCIPLES OF DISABILITY RIGHTS
The underlying concepts of disability rights are derived from the fundamental human rights of
justice, freedom, rights of persons, and rights to non-discrimination. These foundations can be
implemented for people with disabilities just as much as they can for anyone. As for specific
measures, there are national and international frameworks that have been instituted to outline
these rights particularly for persons with disabilities due to historical and contemporary
discriminations and abuses against the group. These are major instruments: The United Nation
Convention on the Rights of persons with disabilities which affirms key civil, political, social,
economic and cultural rights of persons with disabilities. The key principles highlighted include:
respect to the inherent dignity of the persons, right to liberty or decision making for themselves,
right against discrimination, participation and inclusion in society without any sort of
discrimination, equal opportunities, right to accessibility, gender equality, right to develop and
grow in the manner they want to be growing, and finally, right to preserving their identities of the
disabled persons. Realization of such principles involves the removal of obstacles, the provision
of adjustments or adjustments, and services so that persons with any type of disability can
exercise choice and fully and equally participate in all spheres of life in the community including
P a g e | 17
education, employment and culture. Again, accessibility and universal design are central to the
advancement of disability rights in ways beyond mere rhetoric but in tangible, real terms. People
with disabilities must be involved in policy and programming regarding them as the disability
rights’ adage asserts: “Nothing about us without us.” Law reforms and political changes have
occurred but there is much more yet to be done at community level and legislative level to
modify attitudes and to remove economic, built environment, communication and social barriers
still existing to lock out the majority of people with disabilities from full integration in most
societies of the world.
a. Non-discrimination and equality
Non-Discrimination principle demands that disabled persons are like every other citizen with
rights to equal opportunities. Disabilities, while a legal aspect, should not be a cause of prejudice
or even a notion that human rights can be deprived based on this factor. Any prejudice against
disabled persons is considered as a violation of their rights and as ableism. Individuals with
disabilities have suffered from historical discrimination in a manner that encompasses patriarchal
approaches that would portray disability as a problem that needs to be corrected or controlled.
However, the social model of disability perceives obstacles and non-implementation of
opportunities in the society as the process of disabling, not bodies’ functions. All human persons
are created equal and have inherent rights regardless of how they may differ in terms of physical,
sensory or mental capacities. Special needs do not make one have lesser privileges to all facets of
life in the community including schooling, health, work, transport, voting and the court.
Universal design and accessibility have to become a part of structures, equipment and services so
that people with disability can enjoy an independent living and participation. It also suggests that
in learning, labor and livelihoods should also be easy for participation to be made by the
P a g e | 18
disabled. This means that the eligibility criteria for the service should be liberal and there should
be befitting and suitable service that one is eligible to receive. Special care is taken in advocating
the rights of disabled persons, where one needs to avoid use of language that identifies the
person with disability. Equality can only be achieved when one is able to eliminate any
remaining prejudices, beliefs, or prejudices that disabled populations are incapable of
accomplishing certain tasks or are worthless. An equitable society for all fosters the growth of
each of its member’s abilities and productivity by providing equal opportunities, fair chances,
and reward with the blessings of non-discrimination and exclusion because of disability.
b. Accessibility and universal design
Universal design and accessibility involve the approach of designing products, devices, services
or environments that are accessible to all the people of a given community without requiring
additional adaptations to be made. Accessibility allows the disabled persons to have full control
in acquiring and utilizing places, goods and services. These are such features as the use of ramps
instead of stairs, Braille signs, website content in a format accessible by screen readers, and
captioning and sign language interpreting of audio-visual materials. In accessible design, the
changed properties that enable access and usability for persons with a disability are incorporated
right from the design phase and not as an afterthought. Just as in the case with the previous point,
this integrated approach also tends to help people with no disabilities. Designing with
accessibility at its heart from the beginning aligns with the basic tenets that people with
disabilities are equal citizens with rights to be treated as such and controls over their own
existence. Accessibility accepts disability as a part of diversity, unlike the medical model that
portrays the disabled as mentally or physically deficient individuals who require curing or fixing.
It changes the design thinking from the perspective of modifying or treating the person with
P a g e | 19
disability’s characteristics to that of modifying the environment to reduce obstacles. The barriers
that may be targeted could be physical, those related to technology, communication, cultural or
policy-related. Accessibility is closely related to universal design, but the latter is more accurate
and encompassing, as it implies design of products or environments for use by all people without
modification. For instance, lever door handles are provided in place of round knobs for door that
are easy to turn besides helping those with mobility issues, it is also convenient for parents using
baby strollers or individuals carrying bags. This is a key aspect of disability rights as it
eliminates the need of considering disability as an afterthought in the design process, this
incorporated model ensures that the person with disability is respected, self-reliant and is a
valued member of the society. It communicates to the public that accessibility must be legislated
and mandated, not a charitable bonus to consumers. Successful design decisions in this case
improve not only accessibility and functionality but very often durability and sustainability, and
even the quality of the product itself. With the consideration of accessibility as a potential to
produce improved designs instead of having to bear the law as a necessity this strategy represents
the atmosphere of the disability laws.
c. Autonomy and independent living
The disabled individuals have undergone many challenges in that they have not been accorded
the opportunity to make their personal decisions and lack the freedom to live normal lives in
their communities. Assumptions of the disability rights movement point to the individual rights
of people with disability to self-determination, choice and autonomy for personal development.
These are self-directed services and supports for the provision of support to enable individuals to
live independently, accessibility of affordable and barrier-free housing and transportation, access
to healthcare and assistive devices, education and skills development opportunities, personal
P a g e | 20
assistance services, financial help and benefits system, and accessible employment and economic
independence. Disability rights principles emphasize the need to change the existing thinking,
strategies and resources for this purpose and support decision making and service delivery in
ways that will help facilitate the disabled person to achieve personal goals and fully integrate
into family and community life. This entails doing away with patriarchal and welfare-oriented
perceptions that set lower bounds of the physically challenged to make them incapable of making
decisions for themselves and take responsibilities for their decisions. It also calls for
mainstreaming of both the society and systems of service and support for the flexible and
purposeful accommodation of the needs and circumstances of people with disabilities. In
essence, supporting the concept of self-determination and self- management is about ensuring
that persons with disabilities have the same right to make choices, receive information, be given
options and autonomy in every aspect of their life as well as choices in daily min details up to the
major life options as those without disabilities. Adherence to these principles safeguards basic
human rights of disabled persons to be accorded dignity, an equal opportunity to undertake
productive activities and be integrated into the community.
d. Participation and inclusion
Disability rights paradigm also gives prominence to the basic entitlement for the person with
disabilities to have an effective and genuine opportunity to participate in all spheres of life. One
of them is the idea of expanding inclusion to eradicate discrimination, reverse discriminations,
address discrimination, and make adjustments to ensure the disabled can be included in the
community with the rest of the population.
In practical terms, this implies that persons with disability should be given equal chances just
like any other persons without disabilities in such aspects as employment, education, health care,
P a g e | 21
transport, political and administrative realms. However, access does not necessarily mean that
voice has been achieved and when claiming voice, it is not just the opportunity to have a say, to
contribute and make a difference. To make the environment, programs, and service easy to use
for everyone and be effective for the disabled right from the start, such design principles should
be used.
This accounts for a reasonable accommodation offering precisely what an individual needs in
order to effectively and meaningfully engage in the specified setting, whereas accessibility
standards define what settings require universally. Meet individual needs in terms of
accommodation; accessibility as a whole makes it count. These range from offering of
communication equipment, choice of working hours, structural changes such as provision of
ramps or lifts, web sites which can be read by the ‘talk to me’ ten percent screen reader,
captioning or sign language interpretation. Most importantly, the concept of accommodation is
not intended to gain an unfair advantage over others; rather, it is a remedy for disadvantage.
While accommodations and access address physical spaces for individuals with disabilities,
inclusion involves acceptance in clients’ attitudes, from support systems, and in the balance of
power. Attitudes that are negative in nature such as stigma, stereotyping and discrimination
create barriers to meaningful engagement. This increases inclusion through social supports such
as personal assistance in activities of daily living plus peer support groups. It was also imperative
to point out that the decision-making processes must embrace people with disabilities and not
exclude them.
While laws and policies aim to protect rights, accommodations and accessibility strive to open
opportunities, only eradicating the negative perspective of disability in full can be considered a
process of barrier removal. Despite the concepts of participation and incorporation being the key
P a g e | 22
paradigms that support disability rights, the issue is, in fact, about membership, belonging and
responsibility.
e. Respect for difference and acceptance
Disabled individuals can be regarded as socially oppressed and discriminated minority in the past
and even present. People with disabilities have fought for their rights through their disability
rights movements for equal treatment, inclusion, accessible environment and decision-making
power, such requirements are based on fundamental principles of the organization that
presuppose the recognition of difference and tolerance. The disability includes a broad spectrum
of the physical, sensory, neurological, intellectual, and psychosocial differences; it means that the
people with the disabilities are the part of the diversity of human beings by default. They should
not be discriminated based on such differences as would be tantamount to denying equal rights
and freedoms as are granted to other citizens. On the other hand, the promotion of difference
means understanding that people with disabilities are entitled to dignity and respect. This
involves valuing people based on the things they are capable of doing, rather than their perceived
disabilities, disabilities or any form of disability that they may be suffering from.
Acceptance extends from this by integrating disability in the natural continuum of human
differences. Others believe that individuals with a disability should be accepted fully and
included in the community inclusively. Acceptance thus requires a shift away from medicalized
ideas about disability that view it simply in terms of dysfunction, impaired function or
pathology. It means embracing disability stories, histories and people as valuable and in the
image of human beings. Acceptance also requires proactively creating accessible contexts so that
people with disabilities can participate without barriers and prejudices including attitudinal,
physical, communication, policy and system barriers. Ensuring access and participation and
P a g e | 23
supporting self- determination fosters independence and empowers persons with a disability to
achieve desirable goals and potentials based on individual talents, interests, preferences and
decisions. The right to be respected, accepted and to accommodate diversity enables disabled
persons to experience quality of life and inclusiveness.
4. IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS
Success in implementing the law together with robust measures to enforce it is crucial to
protecting the rights of the disabled persons. The commitment is needed not only for ratifications
and signatures, but also for the steps to translate the principles into actions as well. Governments
should therefore set adequate funds and efforts to ensure that disability is included in all
provinces across the Country in the areas of education, health, employment, transport, sports and
culture. Assessment of access for the purpose of considering how well services and programs are
set up to help identify areas of weakness. Provisions that require reasonable accommodation
must also encompass private entities, not only the entities of the state.
As prevention mechanism, anti-discrimination laws stating that a person cannot be denied
reasonable accommodation should have proportionate scaled punitive provisions. With the help
of consistent data gathering and reporting on implementation effectiveness to the related
institutions, deficiencies requiring rectification have been identified. The following can consider
and investigate the alleged violation by organizations and bodies of human rights and
fundamental freedoms: National human rights institutions and disabled people’s organizations
with clearly defined review and complaints handling powers. When domestic remedies are
absent or inadequate, or where complaint mechanisms are unable to deliver remedy, better access
to regional or international complaint mechanisms for remedy can constrain State accountability.
P a g e | 24
Support for self-contained living arrangements which support the everyday needs of disabled
persons should be provided with long term financing.
As opposed to specific and isolated efforts for the disabled, their integration in all legislation,
policies and programs is vital. The imbalance of attitude and action towards disability can be
positively influenced through constant capacity of government officials, judiciary, healthcare
professionals and law enforcers on disability issues. Inviting disabled people’s organizations to
participate in policy consultation, formulation implementation and reviewing also creates an
environment for participatory decision making. The staffing of PwDs in public authorities can
contribute to increasing diversity and ensuring the inclusion of people with disabilities. By
means of the financially and legally assisted self-organization, those people at higher risk of
being exploited or exposed to violence can regain their agency. This is because the concept of
human rights requires the removal of structures that exclude the disabled in the society in all
spheres of existence.
a. National legislation and policy reforms
In order to achieve the overall goal of conveying the basic tenets protected within conventions
and laws, ensuring the rights and worth of people with disabilities, there is a need for committed
implementation and vigorous compliance. Legal bodies should introduce effective reviewing and
monitoring standards to measure the degree of compliance by public and private players and
assess inclusion factors affecting the disabled. The implementation base should be compliance
regulations that set out practicable accommodation measures, structural and communications
standards, non-discrimination measures, standard universal practices and requirement for
mandatory periodic reporting. Appropriate capacity-building should be put in place as way of
undertaking sensitization drives and training which should include key decision-makers to ensure
P a g e | 25
that the intended implementation has disability-inclusive attitudes. Legal sanctions that adhere to
the notice and advice principle indicating remedial action accompanied by measures to be taken
and timeframes, or compliance checks showing continuous non-compliance of the conduct
should attract legal consequences such as fines. NHRC/NHRIs including commissions should
independently and actively promote the implementation of disability rights through inspections,
visits complaints handling inquiries and policy advisories. Greater cooperation between the
different regulatory agencies and approval by disabled people organizations would enhance the
monitoring frameworks. Periodic third-party audits conducted independently outside the
provincial or national government can bring in some level of impartiality in the assessment of the
implementation of disability rights, which is a noble idea to consider the use of technology in the
complaints redressal system can enhance inclusion enforcement for persons with disability. Clear
reporting of complaints and legal assistance centers should enable the pursuit of redress for rights
abuses against disabled people particularly in hard-to-reach areas. Introducing structures of
justice that do not rely on the formal court system, as a means of enforcing the laws would
enhance the process. Proper budgeting in line with policy statements is crucial for resources
implementation that may include awareness campaigns or availability of access structures. First
and foremost, the strong political will in combination with numerous partnerships between
governments, civil society organizations and disabled population can create efficient
enforcement which is essential for maintenance of the primary principles ensuring the dignity,
legal capacity and social inclusion of disabled people.
b. Role of UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
The UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has a significant function of
monitoring the parties that are signatory to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
P a g e | 26
Disabilities, the Committee is an expert body and it considers the reports submitted periodically
by States parties wherein States parties provide information on legislative, judicial, policy and
other measures undertaken to discharge their obligations under the Convention. Considering
reports and engaging in a discussion with government delegates, the Committee considers
achievements as well as the remaining tasks to achieve the rights for persons with
disabilities. Where appropriate, the Committee provides concrete guidelines and proposal to
States parties to enhance implementation and enforcement of the Convention.
Another important role of the Committee is the consideration of the individual complaints or
letters expressing intention to violate the Convention by the States parties. In opting for the
Optional Protocol, a State asserts to the authority of the Committee to investigate and conduct
inquiries on grave or systematic violation of the Convention. On the basis of dependable
information, the Committee can also conduct secret investigations because if it receives some
believable information that severe violations of the Convention are taking place in certain state
jurisdiction, then the Committee may conduct secret investigations. After evaluating the results
of such investigations, the Committee sends recommendations to the State Party for addressing
this issue.
Despite the fact that the Committee has no enforcement power to claim compliance and relies
mainly on cooperation and discussion, it plays a critical part in overseeing the implementation of
the Convention. By considering complaints, handling complaints and conducting inquiries, the
Committee has knowledge of the areas where States are not performing optimally or are not
meeting their obligations in relation to disability rights. As an advisory body, the Committee can
encourage States to take proper steps for implementing such obligations internationally through
its recommendations, suggestions and other advice, it also informs the international community
P a g e | 27
and stakeholders on the advancement and setbacks of realization of an inclusive, accessible and
non-sectarian environment for disabled persons internationally. Thus, the Committee contributes
more to the effective implementation of provisions of the Convention.
c. Shadow reporting and civil society engagement
Shadow reporting refers to situations where civil society organizations give further details
regarding the human rights situation of certain states in relation to their compliance with the
treaty obligations of the state in question and commitments. Analyzing the nature of shadow
reporting, it is imperative to note that this form of accountability is outside the intergovernmental
or governmental monitoring bodies but remains an effective method of enforcing accountability
where states are given the responsibility of protecting human rights. Civil societies work as
whistleblowers and provide counter evidence and narratives on incidents like torture, brutality by
the police, discrimination, violation of women rights, censorship and restrictions on the freedom
of disabled persons to mention but a few. Shadow reports therefore, serve an opposing narrative
to the official state reports, by complementing information and eradicating fact deficiencies.
They exist to amplify the concerns of vulnerable individuals and groups whose stories are often
left out by the regular official human rights scrutiny and narratives, by exerting pressure on
governments to address areas of policy violations and institutions that are weak in the
implementation and enforcement of treaties, shadow reporting also brings about the need for
state actors to address civil society and prioritize human rights aspirations. This also means that
shadow reports provide local activists, ethnic minorities and vulnerable groups the voice to be
heard by monitoring bodies such as the United Nations treaty committees, but it also allows them
to receive more detailed and accurate overviews of the national-level situations to formulate
recommendations for positive changes to the state’s compliance systems. Consequently, shadow
P a g e | 28
reporting captures citizens’ capacity to engage in global human rights supervisory systems
sensitization with the assistance of international frameworks that enshrine the right to freedom of
expression and access to information as preconditions for meaningful participation.
d. Litigation and strategic case law
Legal action and exceptional case laws are of tremendous significance in the application as well
as the execution of laws and policies. Through litigation of legal issues associated with subjects
of legislation, societies and individuals are able to enforce compliance and ensure that violations
attract the required repercussions. Impact litigation in specific enables the advocates to choose
cases which if taken up to top courts could develop great standards. For instance, a trial where an
individual sues a large company for polluting could be heard and taken to a federal circuit court
or the Supreme Court. This may have a ripple effect on the related environmental laws across
this company’s multiple Stations and the states they operate in if the court awards the corporation
a tough penalty against its non-compliance.
These are the type of litigation high impact litigation that the public interest law firms undertake
precisely for the purpose of creating case law on the subject preferred policy direction, they sue
to influence the interpretation of laws and to prevent infringements by raising the costs to those
who violate the laws and regulations. Therefore, where strategic, such case law can help support
administrative implementation by agencies responsible for regulating compliance and enforcing
policies, the continued attention given to high-profile litigation enhances public support for more
robust rules and enforcement officials.
Although administrative fines and sanctions are still the dominant mode of encouragement and
day-to-day enforcement, litigation offers the sharp end of enforcement in the form of heavy
P a g e | 29
penalties that the court implements to punish prominent offenders. The fact that poorly set
precedents and significant risks are quite likely to occur prevents the entities regulated by law
from failing to meet their legal requirements. Secondly, strategic lawsuits enable advocates to
strike at the specific loopholes in regulations while also challenging agencies’ under-
enforcement. Thus, litigation deals with implementation gaps which cannot be solved through
mere administrative procedures. Impact case law as a way defines the culture around the issues,
thus giving the necessary impetus towards compliance. Therefore, litigation, chosen strategically,
centers on test cases; it is necessary for turning legislative dreams into substantive behavioral
changes and justice.
e. Monitoring and evaluation of rights implementation
Supervision of the rights implementation process must therefore set appropriate measurable
targets and standards against which improvements over time can be assessed. Percentage
proportions of the population’s exposure to certain amenities such as health, education, shelter,
and social security should be measured by quantitative data. Analyzing from the rights
organizations, there is a possibility of having a qualitative way of describing discrimination or
obstacles some groups still encounter in their quest to enjoy their rights. Governments need to
provide leadership in creating efficient ways of collecting such data by releasing disaggregated
statistics, supporting surveys and allowing external monitors to gain access to the necessary
information.
National human rights institutions are crucial in the promotion and protection of rights, either
through their involvement in the monitoring of states parties’ compliance with their treaty
obligations, or through addressing violations themselves. These institutions file shadow reports,
offering their own account of events to negate government claims during pre-scheduled meetings
P a g e | 30
based on reports before UN treaty bodies, they are appointed for a wide subject area which
encompasses all the rights issues and they can conduct public inquiries, initiate legal
proceedings, make recommendations regarding reforms. Efficiently funding national institutions
also enhances the monitoring and advocating processes for human rights, countries with the poor
internal supervision should invite UN special rapporteurs for receiving the visits or establish an
ombudsperson.
The generation of statistics and reports should also build the policy evaluations as to what
treatment has proven useful to fill which gaps and what additional strategies might be required.
Some of the means through which consultation with rights holders can be implemented includes;
Ensuring that policies envisage the highest possible coverage of the vulnerable groups. Reporting
cycles are set up in treaties, but in the internal processes of government ministries, reviews are
conducted more frequently. It is possible to conduct five-year evaluations through independent
commissions that will enable them to carry out a detailed analysis of the effectiveness of the
working strategy, accomplishments, problems, and goals in all the areas of focus.
Promoting rights-based budget monitoring tracks the spending to see whether it follows up on
the words and policies regarding implementation. Audits assist in identifying either through
analysis, that there are areas where funds earmarked have been drawn down or wasted. Honest
ledgers reveal annual spending on needful areas like health, housing, education and welfare
programs for the deprived sections of the society. The outcomes of disconnects and possible
areas where more funding is appropriate or where programs may require
modification. Monitoring generates credible information that enables civil society to campaign
on policy changes that can close the implementation gaps observed.
P a g e | 31
5. CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Disability rights are therefore one of the subcategories of human rights, which are a fundamental
right of each human being. Persons with disability for the longest time are still struggling to
promote full access and inclusion participation in all spheres of public and private domains.
Prominent legislative changes that reflect anti-discrimination and accessibility standards are
partly credited to lobbying activities by the grassroots self-advocacy organizations of disabled
citizens. But barriers limitations exclusions unfair treatment persists as they are written into
systems structures, social norms, and cultural predispositions.
Moving to the futuristic issues and trends these have implications on how disabled persons will
be able to claim their rights. Ensuring that the climate crisis disaster response sustainability takes
into consideration the safety needs of disabled people in the evacuation process as well as access
to relief services, rebuilding processes. Technological developments such as artificial
intelligence genetic engineering are relatively new and also bring in new risks benefits with
effects on disabled communities which are disproportionate. These development insights
leadership is therefore crucial in governance oversight regulation for the upliftment over
marginalization.
Societal level: Ableism and a narrow conception of productivity and citizenship are some of the
societal level persisting challenges. Public health crises like the pandemic reveal shortcomings in
social welfare and protection. Housing, transport, education, healthcare, and inequities that result
in job income housing transport education healthcare inequity must be eliminated to stop or
strengthen disability-based deprivation. Therefore. cultures such as race ethnicity, gender and
sexuality worsen the barriers even further.
P a g e | 32
Overall continued progress depends on upholding key principles: self-organizing self-
governance rights respect human rights/liberty choice engagement common ended discrimination
accessibility usability accommodation. Frameworks policies programs interventions should
incorporate such values in a manner that is more than merely consultative but rather involves co-
design with disabled stakeholders and those with ‘lived experience’. That is why when it comes
to culture change shift, culture change is best done from bottom up by using public awareness
education contact theory. That provides framework for fair political policy formation together
with prudent, efficient and effective use of resources. Real accountability transparency also
important for the fact that follow- through is also required.
a. Intersectionality and multiple discrimination
Intersectionality as a critique acknowledges the fact that gender discrimination works hand in
hand with other discriminative structures like racial, class, sexual, and disability. Thus, the
intersectional approach emphasizes the fact that people exist in multifaceted social roles which
make them subject to or grant them power in multiple forms of oppression or privilege. For
instance, the two social categories of race and gender intersect whereby Aboriginal women
experience racism as well as sexism at the same time. Intersectionality describes how power
functions across various aspects of oppression and how various forms of oppression intertwine.
Analyzing intersections will continue to be important for comprehending current social
injustices. This means that, particularly, populations at the margins endure double or even triple-
volumed barriers that stem from the intersectional integration of the various aspects of their
being and their place in society. Homeless racialized women experiencing and struggling through
poverty, racism and sexism, making their oppression and marginalization even more severe. This
is because quantitative tools such as the Gender Inequality Index provide a narrow outlook of the
P a g e | 33
impacts of gender inequality by only focusing on basic parameters such as literacy rates,
employment, and life expectancy. Participatory, qualitative approaches are more effective in
capturing lived experiences in areas that policy has often ignored, but statistics remain the
primary mode of policymaking.
They must do so ‘big data’ yet always returning to first-hand accounts that can help bring to the
fore more often than not intertwined domains of subjugation. It may be useful to initiate research
regarding innovation in the field of mixed-methods research strategies. For example, National
surveys integrated with In-depth interviews, focus groups would help to examine the macro-level
realities and micro-level manifestations of the phenomenon simultaneously. Participatory digital
storytelling as a creative practice that allows the voices of those whose perspectives have been
silenced to counter dominant narratives might expose new forms of intersectionality that need
political intervention.
More importantly, analysis must drive action, Postcolonial intersectional theory often only aims
at mapping the complex nature of disadvantage but does not create real change. Research should
specifically feed operational and cultural changes addressing fusion discrimination. The policy
makers should engage the researches in coding the recommendations covering policy gaps in the
specific intersections such as the low-income trans migrants, in its deeper essence therefore,
intersectionality’s radical aspect is therefore anchored on the ability to shift from theoretical
reflexivity toward social change.
b. Digital accessibility and emerging technologies
Technological advancement is a double-edged sword in that on one hand it poses opportunities
for the disabled but on the other it has several disadvantages in that it is constantly advancing at a
P a g e | 34
very fast pace. With every new technology that is developed and or adopted it becomes a
challenge to make it accessible to all. With each successive new mobile devices and other digital
services starting from the smartphones, virtual reality and AI assistants, the call has been made
for the inclusion of accessibility right from the start rather than having to wait for the appropriate
time to add the feature in later. But yet, often enough accessibility remains an afterthought. It is a
positive that legislation provides a framework and guidance on expectations for some industries
while sometimes being out of date with modern technology, it will be important to note that
disability groups, technologists, designers, companies and governments will need to form active
partnerships to promote equity in the policy and practice in the fast-developing society.
New technologies such as augmented and virtual reality, the Internet of Things, advanced
robotics and self-driving automobiles pose to redefine the human experience for everyone
including the disabled who face sensory or mobility impairments or mental health issues. Virtual
reality, advanced homes, drivers’ cars, and smart robots can truly free, engage, and extend
humans. Without being consciously designed for ethical reasons, they run the risk of creating
new boundaries or exclusion. It is therefore important to emphasize that the diversity of human
functioning has to be incorporated into the development processes. In addition to the technical
standard and guidelines, there should be culture and community to support inclusive innovation
as it is critical to avoid the situation where new technology creates barriers for disabled people
instead of helping them.
The property of processing of digital information and AI also have the signs to improve
communications, education, employment and more by presenting individualized front-ends,
auto-completion, speech recognition and real-time translation. However, machine learning
systems may also reinforce bias or miss opportunities for oppressed populations if not trained
P a g e | 35
from diverse and appropriately curated datasets identified by human intervention. The last
question remains completely open and is one that many researchers are actively working on,
namely: How to achieve algorithmic fairness? More work in collaboration with computer
scientists and social and humanistic sciences should be done so that AI does not ignore disabled
people or reject them based on arbitrary reasons coming out of the computer
algorithm. Protection and support should be provided to allow people make their own decisions,
not to make decisions for them or treat them like objects.
c. Disability rights in humanitarian crises and conflicts
Individuals with disabilities experience increased vulnerability and barriers when responding to
HACs and/or conflicts. Suffer from extensive displacement, limited access to health services,
rehabilitation and assistive technologies, prejudiced attitudes, higher risk of violence, and
restricted mobility in educational and economic sectors, all these detrimental effects jeopardize
their fundamental rights and human dignity. It is becoming more apparent that the rights of
persons with disabilities should be protected and promoted, particularly during crises and
conflicts through adherence to the UN CRPD. But still, there is a rather significant divide
between the government’s promises and the actual progress of implementation.
Some of these challenges that present themselves today are; inadequate data collection, analysis
and reporting about people with disabilities to mean that they are invisible in the humanitarian
response. Needs assessments almost always fail to identify or capture disability-specific needs
and strengths. The required financial support to ensure CVA approaches are accessible and
inclusive is insufficient. Mainstream programs are not able to recognize and take into
consideration needs of a person with disability. Lack of infrastructure, information and
communication is now considered to be a barrier. Knowledge gaps, prejudices, and
P a g e | 36
stigmatization reduce the chances of participation and access, it is clear that there are significant
gaps in the market in the area of rehabilitation, especially with regards to technologies and
support services. These all erode the reserve and independence of the persons with disabilities.
It will be necessary to build upon the lessons learned in future emergency management
endeavors by promoting inclusion, participation and citizenship of persons with disabilities in
contingencies planning, response, and rebuilding processes. Lack of enforcement of UD, RA and
accessibility standards require strict adherence to these standards. Inclusion of disability in
trainings and awareness campaigns for the humanitarian systems and increased engagement with
the organizations of persons with disabilities fundamental to changing the culture and operations.
Solid and non-discriminatory legal systems and polices need to be in place and correlate with the
CRPD and must be availed equal measures in terms of enforcement mechanisms. Proper
resource provision and disability differentiated data are indispensable for effective, context-
informed programming. Dual strategies that involve meeting disability needs as well as adopts
mainstreaming in crisis prevention and response for people with disabilities is needed to protect
their rights and promote their dignity before, during and after crises.
d. Mental health and psychosocial disabilities
Schizophrenia and other related mental illnesses and psychosocial disabilities are some of the
major modern-day giving challenges. People continue to feel ashamed, thus never seeking help
at a time when methods for treatments can be most effective. Other factors such as low health
literacy levels and inadequate and costly mental health services also exacerbate these challenges.
At the same time, prevalence of several non-communicable diseases such as anxiety, depression,
and suicidal behaviors are on the rise particularly among the young people.
P a g e | 37
Therefore, efforts on the part of both governments and organizations to continue to increase
people’s awareness of mental health issues and treatment, in order to reduce stigma and increase
mental health literacy, are still relevant. This helps in early diagnosis and improved results This
makes easy identification and hence leads to improved results. However, the current issues go
beyond mere prejudice. There is already a number of protocols delineating how to work with
people with mental health disabilities, but the problem is that the majority of the world’s
population cannot get access to these services because either there is lack of funding, or the best
practices are not available to the public. In the well-off world regions, mental health care
delivery systems fail to translate evidence-based practices into practice while dealing with long
patient turnover, exorbitant charges, brief patient encounters and inadequate integration of
mental health and general health care services.
Potential future trends would involve international attempts at enhancing funding, availability,
and standards of mental health care throughout the world, it is also important to implement and
enhance the supported implementation of researched and developed practices of mental health
disabilities. Innovating new interventions and also enhancing the current ones with developing
technologies such as smartphone applications and telemedicine can also provide for potential of
eradicating the barriers. Subsequent studies, which are inclusive of the experiences of people
with mental health disabilities, will help in understanding the biological factors behind mental
health disabilities and the related sociocultural impacts, this will make the practices more
targeted and effective in its approach while passing into consideration the equity aspects of
persons with mental health disabilities hailing from marginalized backgrounds. There is need to
embrace more comprehensive multiple-layered and integrated as well as synthesizing approaches
involving all the stakeholders.
P a g e | 38
e. Bioethics and disability rights
Persons with disability are still marginalized in bioethics discussions that shape policy and
practice, thereby fueling misconceptions about the wellbeing of disabled people and
discriminating against them in hospitals. New policies advancing the enrolment of progressive
inclusion disrupt the narrative of disability as an inevitable threat to the quality of life. While the
cultural transformations remain behind the implementation of inclusive strategies, it is crucial to
highlight that the designed measures support the independence of disabled people. Disabled
communities need the sensitization of the public on their daily experiences and the need for
organizations to train their affected groups in advocacy. The role played by families and
physicians leads to neglect of the disabilities’ preferences during end-of-life decision making
despite the available frameworks supporting the patient’s preferences. Again, parental feelings
prevail over the child needs for curative interventions for developing self-identity when disabled
children are regarded as valuable assets. Failure to recognize sentience and personhood renders
disabled people invisible and equates their existence with not being alive. Calculations in cost-
benefit analyses that neglect the plight of such groups in an effort to promote the general good
disregard the dignity of disabled lives or acknowledge external factors that disable. Lives that are
considered not worth living are fallaciously placed on similar parity with resource constraints.
These quality-of-life categories are in fact anthropomorphic, ad hoc and at the heart of their base,
are subjective and opaque as to the onerous physical, social and attitudinal barriers that are
inflicted rather than being intrinsic to the persons. While many people have a formal right as
legislated, social attitudes that equate severe illness and disability remain as reasons for abortion
and refusal of treatment. Although policy reform signifies the direction of change, change
requires constant awareness campaigns directed towards policymakers and healthcare
P a g e | 39
stakeholders, as well as the proportional distribution of technological support based on users’
needs and preferences to embrace choice and self-determination.
