1
IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS ON
HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY DEVELOPMENT
1. Definition and Roles of INGOs
A. Understanding INGOs
The role of INGOs as one of the major driving forces of global dynamics is crucial because these
organizations neither are subordinate to a particular state’s government nor are confined to
solving strictly national problems, especially human rights violations. INGOs include the
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch organizations that are global in their functions
and work by fighting for human rights, offering humanitarian help, and also shaping policies. Its
relevance resides in the fact that they can gather funds and professionals to address multifaceted
global concerns, gave a face and a voice to the oppressed, and participate in putting pressure on
governments involved in human rights abuses (Lewis, 2018). Self-governance of INGOs is
important since they can visibly operate on behalf of their members. This partly make them
strategic in monitoring, reporting and responding to cases of human rights abuses since, unlike
most governmental organizations, they enjoy certain level of independency. Due to their non-
state membership, which means that INGOs are not affiliated to any specific country then they
can easily thread the militarized, geopolitical jungle and not be tied down by any national self-
interest. Sometimes they work with local groups, and this makes it possible for them to escalate
the locals’ voices and make sure that what the locals can go through is catered for in the
campaigns and endeavors that they undertake. Furthermore, INGOs are now involved largely in
shaping the policies in international level. It is in this sense that groups and organizations can
constantly seek to raise awareness of other incidents and events that may easily go unnoticed by
other international organizations as well as national governments. Both IRG and SARR have
timely reported on many human rights issues and their research outcomes are quoted time and
again on media and influential policymakers in the world in formulating human rights policies.
This thus makes INGOs important agents of formation and implementation of international
human rights norms and also standards. Besides, advocacy and policy, they involved the
implementation of service delivery on the ground as well. In stress the victims they are among
the initial line providing humanitarian help, safety, and human necessities. Their actions in
conflict and disaster struck regions show that they have capability to perform in environments
which may require state’s presence, but which the state may be unable to provide due to various
reasons. Thus recognizing the essential characteristics of INGOs as well as their capacities, it is
thereby possible to realize the necessity of furthering global justice as well as people’s equality.
That is therefore why they are significant in combating human rights violations and also
advocating for humanitarian causes because of their capacity to advocate for resources, policies
as well as to offer first-hand support.
2
B. Historical Background
Independent of government interference, International Non-Governmental Organizations
(INGOs) play a significant role in the global system to solve a number of issues internationally,
especially the human rights issues. There are various INGOs that exist to work globally, some of
them include Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and their main functions include
human rights campaigning, humanitarianism, and policy making (Hopgood, 2018). Their
importance is thus attributed to advocacy for resources and also skills for solving various global
issues, giving a voice to the oppressed groups, as well as the accountability for human rights
abuses by governments (Lewis, 2018). The historical development of INGOs can be dated back
to the nineteenth century with the emergence of such organizations as the International
Committee of the Red Cross that may be viewed as the pioneers of international non-
governmentalism. After the Second World War, there was a dramatic increase in the formation
of INGOs; fostered by the acknowledgement of human rights globally, and the formation of the
United Nations (Iriye, 2020). Again, this period was characterized by advocacy and policy gains
rather than charity with INGOs assuming a more significant role in setting the international
norms and guidelines (Clark, 2020). A presumed regulatory autonomy for INGOs is essential
because of the need to operate independently. This makes them in a better position to supervise,
document and counter acts of human rights violations as compared to other large governmental
organizations. Unlike INGOs that are affiliated with a particular country, IINGOs do not have to
struggle with both internal and external political controversies, something that is important to
give the INGOs credibility for their advocacy as well as intervention. Most of them make use of
local partners, as this therefore helps them to boost local campaigns, while also adhering to local
contexts and also demands. INGOs hence positively affect the formulation of international
policy. Thanks to constant pressure and by providing information with the goal of exposing
certain topics that may be unnoticed by the international organizations’ or national governments.
Their reports and also findings are thereby commonly quoted in the media and also inform policy
makers on the directions of international human rights. For this reason, INGOs occupy a central
position in the formulation and the promotion of international human rights standards.
C. Key Functions
Independent organizations play a significant role in the world today; they are known as
International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) and they engage themselves in a
number of global affairs most of which are related with human right. Many INGOs including
amnesty International and human rights watch are established internationally, aiming at fighting
for rights of people, helping in charity and involving in policy making across the globe
(Hopgood, 2018). Its relevance is rooted in the fact that they can activate resources and know-
how to address multifaceted phenomena, as well as advocate for disadvantaged groups or
investigate governments’ human rights abuses (Lewis, 2018). Historical development of INGOs
going back to the nineteenth century has been evidenced from the International Committee of
Red Cross which was involved in international humanitarianism. After world war two there was
3
a relative increase in the formation of INGOs, facilitated by the global acknowledgment of
human rights and the formation of United Nations (Iriye, 2020). It was during this period that
INGOs started shifting from charity works towards advocacy and more particularly engaging in
the formulation of international policies (Clark, 2020). In the framework of its main activities,
INGO can be focused on the following: advocacy, implementing of services, and policy shifts.
Advocacy is the combat for human rights in society by defining problems through informing,
campaigning and where necessary alas through protest (Keck, Sikkink, 2020). The role of service
delivery thus involves aspects such as; making deliveries of basic necessities like health,
education, as well as disaster assistance to affected persons. Also, INGOs contribute to shaping
policies through research, report production, and recommendations to governments and global
institutions (Brysk, 2019). These functions therefore collectively help to strengthen the global
human rights regime and also advance social justice thus underlining the importance of INGOs
in today’s world. This particular aspect is a matter of essence for the INGOs as the latter is
susceptible to decisions taken by the host country government. This makes them independent to
be able to objectively measure, document and act against human rights violations as contrary to
other organizations affiliated to governments. As a result, INGOs are not bound to state
nationality or allegiance, thus can avoid being trapped in the interstate relations systems and can
be politically neutral, which is imperative to the objective reporting and carrying out of mission
and objectives. Many of them engage and partner with local organizations which strengthen their
work and also guarantee that issues specific to local contexts are considered in their work.
D. Organizational Structure
INGOs have become very significant in the international system as they are fully funded by
international resources and have no affiliation with the government especially in the promotion
of human rights. There are non-governmental international organizations’ like the Amnesty
International and Human Rights Watch, which work at the international level to promote and
defend human rights, deliver humanitarian assistance and shape policy (Hopgood, 2018). The
importance of … NGOs can be described in terms of their capacity to coordinate resources and It
means that NGOs can provide a voice to affected minorities as well as monitor governments’
human rights abuses (Lewis, 2018). The development of INGOs dates back to the earlier part of
the nineteenth century though none of the organizations of that time functioned exactly as
INGOs of today. After the Second World War, there was a marked increase in the number of
INGOs mainly because the whole world embraced the cause of human rights, and formation of
the United Nations. During this period INGOs also started moving away from charity, and the
focus shifted to advocacy and policy influencers (Clark, 2020). It is recognized that INGOs’
primary activities revolve around advocacy, direct service provision, and policy-making
influencing. Advocacy has to do with publicizing and campaigning on matters to do with the
violation of rights, frequently deploying agitation and protest (Keck and Sikkink, 2020). Service
delivery thus means delivering some critical services like; health, education, and also relief
services to the needy persons. In this aspect, INGOs affect policy by conducting studies,
providing written reports and recommendations to governments and global organizations (Brysk,
4
2019). In and together, these functions enrich the Global Human Rights System and call for a
change to prompt the society’s Imperativeness of INGOs in Modern World. Most of the INGOs
possess a intricate structure of an organizational hierarchy with an intention to run smoothly in
different countries. They include headquarters, affiliate offices and local offices, so they can
adapt quickly to numerous global occurrences while remaining relevant locally (Cardenas,
2020). This structure in comparison to a centralized one gives them more freedom and ability to
adjust because the problems related to human rights are manifold and dynamically developing
(Kaldor, 2018). Indeed, governance policies are equally important since they are tasked with
upholding the mission and values of their organizations while delivering their services.
2. Advocacy and Campaigning
A. Awareness Campaigns
International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) offer general information about certain
human rights abuses and call upon the public for change. These campaigns employ a range of
media outlets that include print media like newspapers and television, and newer technologies
which include social media, in order to access a vast audience (Bennett & Segerberg, 2017). As
the next step, skillful framing by INGOs alerts the global public and fosters its sympathy and
engagement as well as pressures governments into mindful reforms (Crack, 2017). These
campaigns differ from mere information sharing in that they go a step further in the following
ways. They thus act as powerful tools in; mobilization of social causes and hence changes in the
political territories. To this end, INGOs make use of very emotional approaches, personal stories
and powerful images to capture people’s attention and enhance the motivation to act together.
This emotive connection is therefore crucial to the formation of a shared global identity with
regards to human rights that thereby transcends geography and also culture. Furthermore, it is not
unusual for INGOs to embolden their campaigns through utilizing the support of local
campaigners, groups, and powerful key players. They thereby work together with various
stakeholders thereby strengthening their advocacy and also making sure the marginalized
groups’ experiences are represented accurately. With the focus on globalization and the
globalization of communications, the part that INGOs have played in the use of media and
communication technologies. Storytelling and digital media are used not only to create
awareness but also to maintain engagement for social justice causes that need long term change.
As they hence constantly evolve to new media environments and hence key global challenges,
INGOs thus continue to be cutting-edge agents of change, fighting for justice, fairness, as well as
human respect worldwide. These campaigns furthermore represent INGOs’ responsibility
towards advocacy for human rights and also human rights promotion, for the creation of the
society that conforms to the principles of justice in the international level.
B. Lobbying Efforts
Lobbying thus constitutes one of the significant capacities for International Non-Governmental
Organizations (INGOs) who wish to influence the policy process both nationally and also
5
internationally. Thus, using lobbying as one of its main and highly effective instruments in its
activities, influencing policies, presenting professionally documented results, and actively
participating in the adoption of legal and regulatory acts that encourage human rights, INGOs
directly address policymakers. This proactive involvement requires the understanding of the
politico-legal systems and the ability to build alliances with like-minded other Non-
Governmental Organizations and actors (Dupuy et al. , 2016). Lobbying efforts by INGOs are
central in the process of transforming the grassroots advocacy into policies. Hence, INGOs offer
means of communicating the voices and issues of the oppressed to the policy makers, which
eliminates the divide between grassroots mobilization and policy implementation. Unlike
bureaucrats and also diplomats, they thereby try to influence policy directions for the betterment
of policies as well as to promote justice through reasoned discourses and also strategies. Public
awareness of a given human rights issue and public support tend to be central to the success or
otherwise of the lobbying campaigns initiated by INGOs. These organizations rely on
coordinating public opinion for a particular reform agenda and with the help of lobbying ensure
the policy makers feel the heat to act towards making the desired change. However, INGOs use
their global networks and partnerships besides lobbying for human rights standards at
boundaries. By the shared and combined efforts of collaboration and diplomacy, they endeavor
to align laws and guarantee the same standards of human rights across the world. Therefore,
lobbying is one of the essential practices that INGOs involved in the human rights issues cannot
avoid going for. These organizations therefore aim at working towards the change of policies in
difficult political terrains to ensure that dignity and also justice for all people is upheld. In a way,
constant lobbying as well as effective participation bring INGOs a big impact on the future of
human rights governing in the world.
C. Grassroots Movements
The grassroots movements facilitated by International Non-Governmental Organizations
(INGOs) play a crucial role for the development and sustainment of the local commitment and
development of the communities that are suffering from human rights violations. Through
coalitions within and collaboration with Local NGOs and other civil society organizations,
INGOs empower marginalized groups and the affected population to advocate from the ground
up (Smith et al. , 2019). More often than not, these partnerships involve cross sectional
approaches to human rights issues, and that focuses on the importance of working at the
community level to address these issues. Strong grassroots movements are characterized by their
capacity to build emancipative sustainable advocacy processes. Thus, through engaging the
community members and fostering collective action, these movements guarantee that the
constituencies’ voices as well as their rights to be considered are protected. Thus, INGOs play
crucial role in building the capacity, offering technical assistance and mobilizing the resources
for such grass-root based social action programs. Further, social organizations backed by INGOs
form the basis of social change at the community level. They thus push for changes in policies to
enable them meet the needs and also the ideals of the community hence putting emphasis on the
institutions governing these agencies. Thus, via grassroots mobilization, INGOs help
6
communities lobby for their rights independently, which ensures that the called process would be
effective and the majority of participants would have a personal stake in it. Furthermore these
movements also bring change towards the structures in the larger society since they address
systems of power that maintain exclusion and also advocate for democracy. This way, INGOs as
well as grassroots movements, together thus help promote human rights ideas and also enhance
the capacity of the civil society. Grassroots movements thus sustained by INGOs remain critical
to the promotion of human rights’ fronts around the globe. These movements are therefore
empowering the community through; collaborative partnerships and also fighting for their cause
in order to work towards building a just society. First, they thereby establish an effective link
between INGO headquarters as well as local people that increases the chances of formulating
global advocacy issues and hence responding to the needs of marginalized groups.
D. Media Engagement
It is considered as one of the most significant elements of INGOs’ advocacy work Instrumental
in drawing attention to human rights matters, and sustaining that attention (Bartel, 2019). This
way, INGOs keep themselves in the journalists’ and media outlets’ databases as credible sources
and guarantee active coverage of important topics. This engagement thus involves; storytelling,
providing analyses and also explanations, providing ways of connecting to individuals and hence
groups suffering from rights violations. As well as providing the public with knowledge, the use
of media is a strong tool to name perpetrators and call for change by protesting against injustice
(Katzenstein, 2018). By using media techniques, information sharing and also effective
narratives, INGOs thereby ensure marginalized groups have representation as well as their plight
for social justice and also eradication of human rights violations is heard. Media advocacy thus
strengthens the advocacy message by increasing the visibility of the INGO in delivering the
advocacy message. Through the purposeful distribution of information through various media
sources, be it broadcast, print or social media technology, these organizations influence public
opinion and set policy agendas. Besides awareness, media coverage also brings pressure in the
form of support from the public forcing the decision makers into taking into consideration human
rights issues. Furthermore, by engaging media, INGOs are able to assume a role of linking the
global and local levels, thereby promoting solidarity cross-nationally and giving voice to global
south actors in the international arena. Since they raise awareness of the effects of rights abuses
and demands for justice, INGOs indeed utilize media to effect social change and international
cooperation. Media engagement is therefore central to the coordination of advocacy by INGOs
and also aids in the promotion of human rights across the globe. Through using media as a tool
for increasing; awareness, coalition building, and also advocacy these organizations are therefore
advancing the goals of democracy, human rights as well as global justice.
7
3. Policy Influence Mechanisms
A. Policy Research
Policy research can be seen as one of the backbone strategies for the International Non-
Governmental Organizations (INGOs)’ engagement in policy influencing on human rights based
on reliable data analysis (Meyer & Bromley, 2020). Due to the detailed studies that are carried
out, INGOs ensure those policy makers, interest groups and the general population gets accurate
and authoritative information. The findings of this work are published in reports, policy briefs,
and journal articles hence contributes to the enhanced understanding and promotion of human
rights locally and internationally and informs policy (Schmitz & Sikkink, 2020). Therefore, it is
crucial to underline that INGOs’ policy research does not stop with injecting knowledge into the
policy process of the host country. It is quite helpful in estimating new trends or threatening
factors in the human rights field and in calculating the directions for further advocacy work.
Evaluating the impact of policies as well as assessing the country’s compliance to its
international obligations, INGOs thus enhance public understanding of human rights issues and
also foster the pursuits of human rights reforms based on sound evidential findings. INGOs
therefore use the research result for dialogue creation and also engagements among the various
stakeholders. They thereby interact with governments, inter-governmental organizations, non-
governmental organizations and also communities to ensure that there is consensus, policy on
rights and also wrongs. This makes advocacy by INGOs more credible and effective because
policy change proposed can be backed by credible data and is responses to marginalized
population. In addition, it is for the same reason that INGOs engage in highly professionalized
policy research and are perceived as watchdog organizations and human rights defenders. He or
she identifies compliance with; international standards, documents violations and also promotes
various justice enhancements of human rights around the world. This active participation thus
does not only reveal such abuses but also raises awareness and also advocate for policy changes
on behalf of the oppressed persons. Therefore policy research is essential to INGO basic tasks,
which include; promoting human rights across the world. Thus, engaging in effective methods of
research and also timely dissemination of results, these organizations thereby contribute towards
policy-making processes as well as advancement of agendas at the international level and also
serve as catalysts of positive changes. Thus, it is the role of the INGOs to actively partake and
demand policymaking based on; facts and at the same time, encourage open discussion to create
justice and respect for rights.
B. Coalition Building
Coalition therefore completes as a; promising approach for the formation of force for INGOs as a
way to thereby enhance their impact on human rights policies. This means that, through
partnerships with many organizations, INGOs can pool their assets, specialist knowledge,
coherence of purpose and stances on major issues (Tallberg et al. , 2018). These coalitions range
from casual affiliations to formal partnership; it is a vast array of the INGOs’ stakeholders,
including other INGOs, local NGOs, academic intuitions, and the governmental organizations
8
(Gulrajani & Swiss, 2018). Thus, the strength of the coalition building is in his/her increased
reach in advocacy and in making widespread grievances authoritative. Due to coordination of a
large number of individuals and groups, it is easier for an INGO-led coalition to achieve popular
support as well as apply higher pressure on the policy makers towards the issues of human rights.
The groups align themselves through WASH coordination campaigns and joint statements as
well as through action, resulting in heightened combined individual organizational influence on
advocacy and societal structures. Furthermore, it assists INGOs in gathering coalition and
mitigates political contingencies which result in building a connection between the global and
local perception. Through engagement in dialogue and negotiation, these collaborations ensure
that all the stakeholders are involved in decision making hence ensuring that their side is well
represented when making policies. This makes such advocacy initiatives more credible and
relevant to the targeted countries and communities as well as relevant in reacting to local factors
on the basis of multiple stakeholders’ input. In addition, the INGO-led coalitions increase
organizational vulnerability and sustainability since the organizations can support each other and
share resources. Through the linkages of funds, technology, and voice, the organizations can be
able to cope with the limitations arising from individualism and work towards accomplishing the
goals of the organization. This multiplex interaction thus not only enhances the capacity of
INGOs to coerce social change in the form of policy transformation but also establishes mutually
beneficial relationships for the accomplishment of lasting change and diffusion of human rights
worldwide. Thus, coalition building is considered to be a strategic approach for INGOs that aims
at strengthening human rights promotion. These organizations’ therefore increase their policy-
making capabilities and also advocacy for change by; building partnerships to transform global
problems as well as seek solutions. Inclusive coalition building therefore, suggests that INGOs
can influence and hence contribute enormously to the creation of; improved social justice, equity
and also rights for people across the globe.
C. Policy Recommendations
Another important aspect of formulation of policies is carried out by International Non-
Governmental Organizations (INGO) because of their research and field work backgrounds and
presenting these to governments and other international organizations (Fagan, 2020). These
recommendations list pragmatic and realistic measures and responses to fundamental human
rights issues and challenges, and they are methodically country- and issue-specific. Flavoured by
advocacy, consultations, and expert appearances, as well as policy dialogues, INGOs control the
formation and application of human rights policies. These policy recommendations of INGOs
can only be fruitful if built on rigorous analysis, understanding of the executing nation’s
environment, and if they conform to the principles of the international human rights instruments.
From case studies, fieldwork, interviewees, and consultations with the affected populations, such
organizations fight for policies that operate on both the symptomatic level and system-centered
level. Therefore, when infusing practical ideas to their work, INGOs increase the potency of
advocacy initiatives by pointing to real-life examples and trends. Furthermore, since many
INGOs participate in this sector in the policy formulation process, effective consultation is
9
facilitated and anybody’s voice is heard while the formulation of human rights agendas. These
organizations thus operate in partnership with civil society associations, academic institutions as
well as the government and hence aim at improving the responsive, accountable and also
transparent policy processes. As a result, through discussions as well as negotiation of interests
within the group, INGOs thereby enhance the support for policy initiatives and also enhance the
ownership of human rights agendas. In addition, INGOs use their advocacy sectors for purposes
of pushing for adoption of the recommended policies, use of data to check on progress and push
for corrective measures where necessary. Through the oversight of adherence to the international
legal standards and also the documentation of the policies effects, the organizations thus enhance
the protection of human rights and hence the global justice delivery systems. Hence, it is
imperative for INGOs to develop and present policy measures to enhance the human rights’
cause around the globe. These organizations therefore frame the policy agenda, inform the
decisions and also promote a progressive change towards the increase of human rights.
Therefore, as the defenders of human dignity, equality, and justice for all, INGOs that provide
policy support based on scientific evidence and encourage global cooperation are very important
in the contemporary world.
D. Monitoring and Evaluation
In this regard, monitoring and evaluation can be described as core professional assets of INGOs
to measure the outcomes of their advocacy and policy work scientifically. Documenting,
evaluating, and studying the experiences of INGOs allow them to determine the success rate of
their programs, as well as evaluate and replicate the effectiveness of certain estimable strategies
(Wapner, 2019). This process helps the INGOs to provide account to the donors, beneficiaries,
and stakeholders that the interventions being made by the organizations are effective, timely as
well as focusing on the human rights goals and objectives (Martens, 2018). The orderly nature of
M&E thus assists INGOs to monitor advancement of advocacy goals as well as objectives
formulated for the course of development. Through; outcomes, outputs, and also impact
measurement indicators, these organizations can therefore identify points of strengths as well as
the necessity for changes and also further efficient strategies. This form of learning thereby goes
a long way in improving on; programmatic intervention, and hence increases the legitimacy of
INGOs’ advocacy. Furthermore M&E is beneficial to INGOs as it allows them to gain valuable
information on the effectiveness and also possibilities of the interventions’ future expansion.
Thus, by assessing the sustainability of policy shifts, the stability of human rights advancements
and also the ability to enhance communities’ capacities, these organizations hence promote long-
term social transformation. Thus, by means of comprehensive evaluation frameworks, it is
secured that all advocacy engagements of INGOs make a sustained positive cumulative
contribution to the human rights and social justice in the long run. Moreover M&E is used as a
tool that offers opportunities for future learning within the organization and also with the key
implementing partners. Thus they hold INGOs accountable, facilitate collaboration and hence
encourage learning from evaluation results for the improvement of human rights advocacy
practices. It more so helps in fortifying partnerships, improve the effectiveness of their
10
calamitous efforts and also raise the visibility of the oppressed. Monitoring and also evaluation is
therefore core to effective implementation of INGOs’ obligations for positive and enduring
change in human rights worldwide. Through this systematic evaluation of the result and also the
outcomes of advocacy interventions, these organizations thus not only report, but also encourage
evidence-based advocacy and hence help enable the creation of resilient, sustainable as well as
inclusive societies. The ongoing learning and evaluating processes increase INGOs’ capabilities
to portray and fight for the human dignity, equality, and justice.
4. Case Studies of INGOs
A. Amnesty International
Amnesty international was formed in 1961 and it is a powerful humanitarian organization for
human rights across the world. Its campaigns are focused on such significant subjects as the
death penalty disappearance, against torture, for free speech (Amnesty International, 2018). This
organization has been very influential in its goals due to its extensive research and membership
base, as well as strong advocacy measures like petitions, protests, and awareness creation
towards alteration of policies that infringe upon the rights of the people (Bryer & Magrath,
2020). As this case study easily demonstrates, INGOs are indeed a force that can prompt radical
changes on the social and political landscape. Amnesty International working style is therefore
marked by a scientific recording of human rights abuses across the globe. During field research
and advocacy projects, the organization gathers firsthand evidence sufficient to support its
advocacy work, evidence gathered from victims’ or eyewitness accounts and partnering with
local stakeholders and human rights groups. Through investigating the cases and also identifying
the violators, Amnesty International therefore fulfills the mission of the human rights advocate
besides making social, political influence, raising public awareness and also inspiring common
people. The specific competency of the organization is in the strategic and efficient organization
of the various enthusiasts, supporters and activists both locally and across the world. About it,
campaigns, petitions, and public demonstrations are conducted, during which Amnesty
International raises the voice of people whose rights are violated and demands justice and
changes in the legal system. Resonating with people’s anger and also compassion, the
organization thus forces governments as well as organizations to act in ways that respect human
integrity and also demand justice for violations of human rights. Thus the organization not only
advocates for policy change but also uses legal cases and also diplomacy. Through engagement
of international human rights forums and also laws, the organization fights thereby against
impunity and hence encourages accountability among justices for those who infringe rights of
other people. In this regard Amnesty International remains therefore an advocate of human rights
issues across the globe and also still today serves as pioneer and influencer of global standards as
far as justice is concerned. Thus, the presence of a lasting influence of AI offends the fact that
INGOs play a crucial role in the promotion of HRS globally. By widely advocating issues,
studying and mobilizing individuals and group, the organization is evidence to the significant
11
change as well as the ability of INGOs in defending human rights coupled with fostering the
rights and human dignity of individuals and groups.
B. Human Rights Watch
Human Rights Watch (HRW) is thus one of the recognized International Non-Governmental
Organizations that was started in 1978 with an aim of establishing and also monitoring human
rights abusers throughout the world. Thus, the data collected and the reports firsthand by the
HRW analysts provide strong evidence most of the time and often attract international attention
and lead to policy changes (Hopgood, 2018). These activities include, conducting campaigns,
pleading with governments and getting in touch with those media houses which they have
affiliations and working hand in hand with local activist organizations in an effort to fight for
accountability and justice (Zarifis, 2018). This thereby reveals that the impact of reports from
HRW is to focus on cases of violations of human rights which go unnoticed and hence
subsequently influence international politics for the cause of human rights. The methods of
advocacy adopted by HRW are innovation ways allied with scientific and structured
investigation procedures. Through field investigations, observation, interviewing of victims and
witnesses, and assembling credible evidence, the HRW comes up with well-coordinated reports
that expose the prevailing human rights abuses’ patterns and those behind such. These reports
therefore play the essential documentation role and also are the basis for advocacy campaigns
addressed to the governments as well as organizations for violation of human rights. These
advocacy activities go further than documenting then making reports, but actively involving the
policymakers, media, and the public. Credible advocacy and awareness raising work is central to
HRW’s mission as it ensures that organizations advocating for victims get justice for its clients
while at the same demanding changes in policy and practice to prevent comparable abuses.
Leveraging on a team of researchers, advocates and its supporters across the world HRW
successfully educates and sensitizes the public domain and exerts huge pressure on governments
to conform to international human rights norms. Thus for HRW, the contribution to the
advancement of the discourse on human rights on the international level can thereby be defined
through its capacity to shape policies and hence encourage multilateral cooperation on particular
matters. Through raising awareness of overlooked injustices and also fighting for policy
transformations; HRW is moreover a driving force behind the world’s response to human rights
abuses. The organization’s partnership with local activists and also civil society organizations
foster capacities as well as development of grassroots movements, the amplification of voices of
oppressed groups as well as the resultant impact of promoting a just society. Human Rights
Watch is thus the vivid example of how INGOs impact human rights positively, influencing the
world for the better. Thus with its sound research methodology, advocacy work and also targeted
interactions with governments; HRW thus helps to; unmask misdeeds, gather evidence, seek
justice, support human rights for individuals and also groups in need all over the world.
12
C. International Federation for Human Rights
International Federation for Human Rights commonly known as FIDH was founded in 1922; is
one of the oldest as well as leading INGOs international non-governmental organizations that
work towards the promotion of human rights across the globe. FIDH which is a federation of
member organizations has its branch across more than one hundred countries, it faces and deals
with multiple fundamental necessities, some of them are; women rights, migrants rights and
corporate responsibilities (Dupuy et al. 2016). As an umbrella organization, it uses advocacy,
legal cases, and policy shaping to ensure the protection of and fight for the realization of human
rights across the globe (Steffek & Hahn, 2020). Thus highlighting the organization’s vast
experience and also geographical coverage; thus makes it easier to understand the importance of
cooperation in the field of human rights. Main methods of work can be described as complex
strategies promoting change of certain violation practices from inside, as well as the advocacy of
changes in international human rights law. A key in advocacy, FIDH researches through its
member organizations and CSO partners, and addresses human rights situations, singling out
violations to gain evidence. In one way, it gives a voice to the voiceless through victims’ and
affected communities’ support and campaigns for justice where governments and corporations
have failed or acted unlawfully. With regards to advocacy, the organization therefore goes
beyond reporting and also employs legal processes to try and seek justice for the victims of
human rights violations. It thus brings forward legal cases invoking International Humanitarian
Law and hence African human rights systems against impunity. Thus through providing legal
assistance and also advocacy in high-profile cases as well as with its support to individuals’
campaigns, FIDH thereby enhances the legal systems and also promotes the cause of human
rights internationally. Also, FIDH participates actively in policy advocacy and diplomacy
whereby it seeks to persuade the policymakers in their decision-making processes on matters of
international human rights. As an international organization, FIDH therefore involves itself in
international meetings, choosing recommendations to international organizations as well as
building up public opinion to ensure an international consensus on the choice of human rights
priorities and also methods of realizing the policies. Organization’s cooperation therefore
increases its ability to respond to intricate human rights issues and also fight for effective long-
term strategies based on human rights.
D. Doctors-Without Borders
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), established in 1971 is an acclaimed International Non-
Governmental Organization (INGO) well noted for providing medical assistance in crises zones
and humanitarian disasters around the globe. It must be noted that the organization’s mission is
based on principles such as neutrality, impartiality, and independence which allow for its work in
some rather hostile and conflict-ridden environments globally (Gunter, 2019, p. 609). MSF’s
model is also characterized by both direct implementation of medical activities and also
advocacy, stress the rights-based aspects of health emergencies and humanitarian crises (Thakur,
2019). MSF operational structure focuses on its quick response to the crises and on the
13
mobilization of the medical teams in the conflict zones, disaster regions and regions experiencing
public health crises. Through providing people in need in, conflict-affected areas with important
and often life-saving healthcare services, MSF reduces suffering and saves lives regardless of the
color of the patients’ skin, their political beliefs or religion. Such direct intervention not only
addresses the health conditions of the people raised in the claims, but also responds to the right to
health as a human right. Parallel to its medical charitable works, MSF also works for the causes
to advocate situation concerning medical care and human right thereby creating awareness on
barriers. MSF also works on awareness rising and lobbying activities to give a chance to the
affected population to be heard and ensure that health, refugees and protection from the harm
during the war are treated as key priorities around the world. Being a human right activist
organization, MSF inform international policies and legislation through documentation of
abuses, offering witness, and raising awareness for overlooked health threats with the hope
creating policies that respect human rights and promote justice. MSF is not limited to the
provision of medical services but also engages in advocacy on the social causes that lead to
people’s ill-health and also other humanitarian issues. MSF does this through seeking justice for
the perpetrators of the violations of international humanitarian laws as well as protecting the
healthcare personnel and facilities during wars, as well as in other conflict-affected areas. Its
commitment to neutrality and independent status also raises the organization’s profile and
influence in influencing the members of the international community to take principled
humanitarian actions and push for evidence-based and workable solutions to the health problems
the world is facing.
5. Challenges Faced by INGOs
A. Political Resistance
This is even more so where the political culture of the country under consideration is colored by
the concept of sovereignty or political instability and where the government appears to offer a
stiff-necked resistance leading to INGOs being locked out. Authoritarian governments are
sometimes particularly unsympathetic to INGOs: limitations are placed on organizational
activities, and working and funding are made more difficult; personnel are persecuted
(Brechenmacher & Carothers, 2018). These measures do not only affect INGOs’ functionality,
but also conflict their advocacy agenda to advance human rights as well as social justice (Cooley
& Ron, 2018). To build long-term political will one needs a much subtler and, often, much
longer process of manipulation, developing influential local partners, and understanding the
regional political realities to ensure maintenance and development of the human rights’
programs. Political strategies of dealing with resistance can be described as follows: To
overcome the barriers of political read justifiable by the fact that INGOs should seek to establish
partnership working with local civil society organizations and community influential key
informants. Thus, establishing relations with like-minded stakeholders, INGOs are able to
reinforce their advocacy and improve the position within the conflict-opposition political setting.
It is also important to mention that the INGOs’ interventions are mutually beneficial, both
14
increasing the credibility and hence ensuring the sustainability against the crackdowns as well as
legal limitations by the governments. Furthermore there is politics involved in most areas and
requires the management to understand the local environment, power relations and also laws.
The following is that INGOs need to change their advocacy practices to legally compliance as
they aim at protecting the rights of the citizens as well as their employees and partners from any
physical attacks. This is specifically because INGOs are in a unique position of maximizing on
opportunities of advocacy and humanitarianism, if not for any reason, then merely due to the
factors explained by the risks that come with engagement in diplomatic relations. Therefore it is
necessary to engage in political confrontation and create local partnerships and consider the
conditions of authoritarian states as key means to address the problems within political resistance
for INGOs. Thus, overcoming these and other political hurdles, INGOs can effectively continue
their missions of supporting human rights, expanding social justice, and achieving sustainable
social change in various politically intricate concerned global regions.
B. Funding Constraints
Financial issues are also a serious issue for INGOs as they seriously influence organizational
planning, programming and hence implementation of the projects. Such practices compromise
the organizational stability, strategic direction and effectiveness in large measure because donor
funding also brings uncertainty and a condition of increased rivalry into the picture (Gulrajani &
Swiss, 2018). Furthermore, donors follow an active voice in the aid program, which involves the
setting of conditions and provisions on the spending of funds, which alters priorities of INGOs
and may create a conflict of organizational independence (Brysk, 2019). To overcome these
challenges; it means that the INGOs has to secure sustainable sources of funding and also
develop new sources of income and continued to practice proper financial management as well
as accountability. To reduce the effects of inadequate funding, INGOs may adopt diverse
funding activities that help to minimize on the use of few donors. This approach thus concerns
divesting the organizations’ dependence on grants and also focusing on building long term
relationships with a legion of supporters that include; individuals, corporate, foundations as well
as governments. From the above discussion, INGOs must adopt measures that will help increase
the level of financial security by diversifying the sources of income and thus reducing the
vulnerability to uncertain donor priorities thereby achieving programmatic impact in the long
run. Moreover when it comes to the sustainability considerations; this work thereby presupposes
that funding should be achieved through the prioritization of values, such as trust, honesty and
also accountability when it comes to donors. By evidencing the level of change delivered by their
programs, effectively marketing their endeavors, and linking their funding requirements to
donors’ maturing strategic approaches, INGOs shall improve their ability to achieve financial
sustainability. When interacting with the donors as true partners in the achievement of the goals
and objectives, INGOs can get reliable funding support as well as get more and more committed
to partnership work for addressing multifaceted humanitarian and development issues. Besides,
implementation of clear accountability and quality financial control measures are also vital to
and donors. INGOs have high standard operating procedures in financial reporting where they
15
are required to report how funds are used and ensure that no misuse occurs. This way, over
checking the working transparency, INGOs do not only follow the ethical measurement but also
promote the improved credibility, which in turn promote the better trust from the side of the
donors, stakeholders and the colleagues-idlers. All in all, it is evident that funding issues present
a range of challenges to INGOs; still, the correct approach to funding entails the focus on the
development of sustainable funding strategies, proper diversification of income sources, as well
as the continuous proper financial management. It is therefore possible for INGOs to address the
uncertainties that arise by funding or securing the much-needed resources for the implementation
of effective programs or projects and therefore serve humanity’s interests in human rights, social
justice and also sustainable development.
C. Operational Risks
Working in challenging and risky contexts presents formidable strength and risk management
consideration to INGOs that among other things concern staffs and beneficiaries’ safety and
security and also organization’s functionality. Vulnerable situations like; violence, natural
disasters and also health epidemics all point to the need for measures to be taken on risk
management as well as particularly the formulation of contingency plans. The above mentioned
threats therefore imply that risk management and particularly the formulation of contingency
measures is a very crucial aspect that should be accorded a lot of attention. Moreover,
operational risks that entail challenges in logistics, legislation, and image challenges are other
real factors that pose a real threat to INGOs’ humanitarian and advocacy goals (Crack, 2017).
Overcoming all these risks; needs anticipation, forming of proper linkages, partnering with
locals, and developing techniques to do proper planning and handling of certain situations. The
most important feature of the learning process, which is closely connected to risk management in
uncertain conditions, is preparation. INGOs have to evaluate all the possible risks and formally
define certain steps to evaluate risks and their probability as well as create contingency plans
which specify actions in case of specific kinds of threats. Such an approach therefore allows
organizations’ to; prepare for adversity, reduce the impact and also alleviate the risk which
endangers the lives of employees of the communities in which organizations’ operate. Also
building good relations with local stakeholders such as; political leaders, non-governmental
organizations as well as the government remain essential in management of security and hence
operating environments. Community involvement therefore enhances positive relations, enables
identification of context-specific information and hence builds the capacities of humanitarian
interventions. Thus, trusting based relations and using local knowledge the INGOs can minimize
the risks, increase the effectiveness of the operations and work for sustainable solutions to the
humanitarian crises. Considering adapting strategies, INGOs must have the ability to go with the
flow in changed threats and in the surroundings that are shaky. This encompasses
communication, having established working and easy learning communication channels to check
on the security status frequently, revising and enhancing security policies and procedures, and
staff development, efforts to train and improve on staff capacity. In this sense, if INGOs focus on
furthering a safety culture, organizational resilience and ongoing improvement, INGOs may be
16
optimistic of improving upon their preparedness to respond to new opportunities and threats
proactive in the advancement of human rights, humanitarian aid, and international development.
Thus, as has been demonstrated, managing risks in uncertain and risky situations constitutes
significant difficulties for INGOs, and only the priority management of risks, effective
partnership with local actors, and the application of the necessary adjustments can guarantee the
successful functioning of these organizations.
D. Cultural Barriers
This review thus reveals the existence of cultural barriers that; pose remarks on the effectiveness
of identified human rights INGOs to thus deliver functional programming to different regions of
the world. This often leads to misconceptions, reluctance, and reduce the viability of
intercessions intended to uphold people’s rights (Fox, 2020). To address these challenges, there
is a need for INGOs to approach the operations in the cultural context very carefully, work with
the communities effectively, understand the cultural factors, and include the knowledge derived
from the culture in their program (Fagan, 2020). Specifically, cultural competence will therefore
help INGOs gain people’s trust, make the programs more relevant and also increase the
effectiveness of the human rights initiatives. But, before one engages the local people, it is
crucial to honor their differences as a result of cultural diversity. INGOs should therefore ensure
that their personnel are trained on multiculturalism by enlightening them on how to exhibit
cultural intelligence. Thus, cultural competence develops among the members of the INGO
allows relationship building, cultural understanding and appropriate interaction with local
communities, indicating the needs and issues that would require changes in the strategies
implemented by the INGOs. Culture sensitivity therefore entails understanding the role and
importance of tradition, culture, and practices in society and in the community as a whole as far
as human rights issues are concerned. INGOs should thus enhance their approach to reflect on
more participation of the members of the communities in designing programs and also their
implementation and monitoring and evaluation. It thereby spotlights the roles of local
communities and hence organizations’ within INGO operations because it thus allows the groups
to develop fit and hence effective strategies that would address the local contexts. Thus the
inclusion of local know-how in programmatic approaches strengthens the applicability of human
rights initiatives. Organizations need to thereby engage communities to gather information on the
issues, learn about the best approaches to advocate as well as address the factors that lead to
human rights abuses. With the acknowledgment of indigenous knowledge and point of views,
not only the effectiveness of INGO’s programs is increased, but also, trustful and reliable
relationships with the community is established that supports further collaborations and united
action towards the attainment of human rights objectives. In conclusion let it be stated that
cultural barriers are always an obstacle on the way of INGOs that work on human rights issues,
however, it is possible to eliminate them with the help of active interaction, cultural sensitivity
and mutual respect of the sides. As a result, including; diversity, understanding cultural
differences and also incorporating local context into INGOs’ actions, these organizations thereby
17
increase the efficiency of interventions and also become agents of change in the global struggle
for human rights.
6. Future Directions for INGOs
A. Technological Innovations
The application of technological advancements can thus be of great benefit to INGOs by
improving their main functions, advocacy and hence generally the promotion of human rights for
the world. Social media in particular has become an essential tool in order to circulate ideas and
messages in the international society and engage supporters together with shedding light on the
internal processes occurring within the framework of INGOs (Bennett & Segerberg, 2017).
These platforms thus help INGOs to reach out to various stakeholders, disseminate information
promptly and also popularize advocacy campaigns on international level. Both, data analytics
and remote sensing technologies are Disruptive Technologies which could be the constituent for
improving the Monitoring and Evaluation Studies in INGOs. Accordingly, it is possible to use
these technologies to collect and analyze the up-to-date information concerning the desperate
situation with human rights, to identify tendencies, and, eventually, to evaluate the efficiency of
interventions more correctly (Meyer & Bromley, 2020). This evidence-based approach thereby
increases capabilities to address new difficulties as they arise, increase efficacy of existing
programs and hence allocate resources to have the greatest benefit. Moreover, adopting
appropriateness encourages INGOs to be suitable and proper in the execution of their functions
in complex situations since it aligns them with technological developments. For instance,
through mobile devices, organizations can achieve field communication, data gathering, and
resources management hence increasing their performance and ability to respond to humanitarian
issues and/or emergency cases on human rights. It also helps that employees can work cross-
functionally and cross-borders through the use of virtual collaboration tools as well as cloud and
SaaS platforms. Also technology supports creative ways of promoting major related to the causes
and also ways for influencing the policy; such as social media, digital stories and interactive
multimedia tools. It can be thereby suggested that advanced technologies create new possibilities
that can help INGOs optimize their interventions and hence increase the pace of achieving the
objectives for protecting human rights globally. INGOs have therefore the opportunity to
improve their general organizational and also operational capacity by effectively utilizing digital
media, big data analysis and hence technology solutions to extend the scope of interventions and
react to changes in the humanitarian as well as human rights environments in a timely manner.
Each of these forms of integration promotes organizational effectiveness whilst increasing
INGOs strategic ability to drive change and support the human person in a range of international
settings.
B. Partnerships and Collaborations
Indeed, it has been ascertained that INGOs’ future success is contingent on their ability to
effectively engage in strategic partnerships and collaborations of numerous types and forms.
18
Analyzing the relations that INGOs develop with other INGOs, local organizations,
governments, and the private sector, it possible to mobilize different resources, knowledge, and
viewpoints on human rights issues to enhance impact and address the multifaceted nature of
human rights challenges (Tallberg et al. , 2018). These partnerships not only increase the
capacity of the organizations but also scale up advocacy and outreach, and increase the diffusion
of the idea and best practices in both/as advocacy and service provision (McGann 2019).
Because of this, strategic partnerships allow INGOs to find other complementary capabilities and
assets that may not be easily found within the organization. For instance, partnerships with
NGOs situated in the target countries thereby offer INGOs the much-needed information about
socio-cultural settings, beneficiaries’ beliefs, attitudes and also outlook on life, which thus makes
the aims of INGOs more suitable and hence effective. Just as corresponding collaborations with
governments and other supranational structures allow for advocacy of policies, securing
institutional capacities, and the provision of targeted social changes at the regional and global
levels. Trust is thus one of the primary prerequisites for cooperation in any organization and also
for creating successful partnerships. In its partnership, INGOs need to focus on the relational
aspect of the partnership, be forthcoming about the organization’s aims and programs, and
embrace common principles and norms of ethics. Stubborn points and unresolved conflicts often
arise when there are no well-defined communication structures, the project does not clearly
define unique spheres of responsibility or poorly developed accountability mechanisms. Hence,
understanding complexities and conflicts, INGOs can effectively manage them and create
conditions for constructive cooperation as a result of which the joint activities would be more
effective. Second, it thereby involves; coordination as well as integration of the goals of the
diverse stakeholder groups for their efficiency in performing their duties. It is imperative that, for
INGOs and their partners, goals must be clearly identified, processes of setting the vision and
mission stated, and decision-making power split. Such an alignment thus enhances the strategic
coherence of the advocacy initiatives, makes for better operational coordination and hence
collectively builds a stronger voice in pursuing the related human rights, social justice as well as
sustainable development goals. Therefore strategic partnerships and also collaborations are
essential strategies required for effective functioning of INGOs that addresses; complicated
issues and hence fosters synergy with other organizations and stakeholders in order to support
the achievement of changes and also improvements within the area of human rights. Focusing on
the trustful partnerships with stakeholders, a higher level of organizational resilience as well as
the increased field of influence will be achieved, therefore, INGOs should cultivate long-term
cooperation to develop long-term effective solutions of existing humanitarian and human rights
issues.
C. Sustainable Practices
It is strategic for INGOs to embrace sustainable practices since it is a way of enhancing the
longevity, sustainability, and reliability for the organizations in their endeavors of promoting
human rights across the world. These commitments are many; they include environmental and
ecological commitment, ethical fundraising, socially responsible business practice, and
19
sustainability of interventions themselves (Stiglitz, 2019; Wapner, 2019). Environmental
sustainability therefore can be defined as the pursuit of carrying out activities in a manner that
reduces their impacts on ecological processes. They can use strategies like; cutting down on
carbon dioxide emission in their operations, encouraging the use of renewable resources, and
practicing sustainable activities during the implementation of projects. Thus, by incorporating
the analysis of environmental concerns in their planning, the INGOs embody the responsibility
of the leaders of global change processes at the same time as they navigate their activities in
compliance with human rights. Ethical practices in fundraising are critical because they retain
public and stakeholders’ confidence in any given fundraising organization or project. Here,
INGOs should act in accordance with the following: Financial management of INGOs should be
perfectly transparent and all the sources of income should be accurately reported; all the funds
donated by individuals, organizations, and governments should be used properly and wisely.
Adherence to ethical standards in fundraising thus adds value to the organization’s reputation, as
well as gains the trust and also support of the donors to support other long-term programs
necessary in an organization. Sustainable conduct refers to the moral conduct of INGO’s
employees, policies and practices in governance and human resource, and relations with the
communities it interacts with. With regard to the specific area of interest, INGOs should
emphasize and promote the principles of faired labor, equality, diversity and inclusion besides
valuing human rights in their systems and practices. Besides promoting ethical standards among
the INGOs themselves, the culture of integrity and social responsibility reflects and strengthens
the confidence of the stakeholders and recreates the commitment of these INGOs towards the
service of the human rights and social justice. Sustainability of intervention requires efforts
aimed at strengthening local people’s ability to perpetuate and modify the programs and
activities. Therefore, skills development, knowledge transfer and institutions building in the
community should be the focus of INGOs as this will favor the sustainability of the enhanced
situation in the long run. Decentralizing the ongoing development endeavors by considering the
distinct communities leads to self-reliance and sustainable human rights enhancement as
compared to assignment-specific methods used by INGOs.
D. Expanding Global Reach
Being a wide world associated with a dynamic structure of human rights issues, the geographical
diversification also plays an essential role in INGOs’ activity to act in new territories and
respond to new challenges. Globalization is thus essential for the development of International
Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) as they seek to implement change and also address
new human rights concerns in various locations as well as situations. Among these, there are
several components: presence in the regions with low density populations, the adaptation of
strategies to the peculiarities of regions, and the involvement of all levels of population
(Cardenas, 2020). On this account, it is correct that, by forging offices in marginalized areas,
INGOs are in a position to interact with the populace in the affected part in human rights and
socio-economic issues. This closeness therefore makes it easy for the organizations to understand
the peculiarities of the environments, people’s demographics and also their pressing needs; all of
20
which go a long way in the formulation of right strategies to undertake in the fight against
different vices. For the relevance of INGO intervention therefore calls for the adoption of various
adjustments to local contexts. This thus encompasses the adaptation of the programs initiatives to
respect the cultural beliefs, political systems and also socio-economic characteristics present in
different geographical areas. In a similar manner, involvement of local people and treatment of
such people as equals when solving problems promote their ownership on what the INGOs do
and hence make their work more sustainable. Managing change in SC is imperative to INGOs
operating in an increasingly competitive international environment. Politics and conflicts in the
region as well as shifts in the regulatory framework can affect the set conditions and proven
difficult for organizations’ to establish or function in (Iriye, 2020). Further, INGOs peruse these
complexities married to their mission statement, value base, and paradigm on the protection of
universal human rights. This may mean working in partnership with community based
organizations, engaging with global entities, lobbying for changes in laws to be in harmony with
the human rights regime across the world. Increasing international presence allows INGOs to
increase its scope of influence by touching the lives of more people suffering from violation of
their rights. Therefore, by expanding the spatial references, organizations can promote the
adoption of human rights for everyone, facilitate people’s solidarity and respond adequately to
new challenges on the international level that appears as new themes such as digital rights,
climate, and refugees’ rights. Therefore, increasing the area of operations is not only rational for
INGOs but most of all; it is ethical, if their mission is to fight for the rights of people all over the
world. For INGOs to get the most out of their endeavors, these organizations should locate
themselves in areas of operation that lack CBOs and ICBOs, use approaches that harmonize with
the local culture, operationalize themselves expertly to counteract new geopolitical situations,
and interact with different groups and individuals.
21
REFERENCE
Amnesty International. (2018). Amnesty International report 2017/18: The state of the world’s
human rights. Amnesty International.
Bartel, R. (2019). The role of international non-governmental organizations in global policy
making. Global Policy Journal, 10(2), 256-268.
Bennett, L. M., & Segerberg, A. (2017). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the
personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society,
15(5), 739-768.
Brechenmacher, S., & Carothers, T. (2018). Examining civil society legitimacy. Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace.
Bryer, T. A., & Magrath, C. (2020). International NGOs and social justice: Global activism for
social change. Routledge.
Brysk, A. (2019). The future of human rights: From gatekeepers to global guarantee. Polity
Press.
Cardenas, S. (2020). Chains of justice: The global rise of state institutions for human rights.
University of Pennsylvania Press.
Carty, V., & Onyett, J. (2021). Protest, social movements, and globalization: Global activism.
Sociology Compass, 15(4), e12868.
Clark, A. M. (2020). Diplomacy of conscience: Amnesty International and changing human
rights norms. Princeton University Press.
22
Clifford, B. (2018). Rethinking international NGOs: A postcolonial approach. Third World
Quarterly, 39(6), 1017-1036.
Cooley, A., & Ron, J. (2018). The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political
economy of transnational action. International Security, 27(1), 5-39.
Crack, A. M. (2017). Transcending borders: Social media and human rights. Routledge.
Dalton, B., & Lyons, M. (2019). Advocacy organizations and collective action: Community
welfare councils in Australia. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and
Nonprofit Organizations, 30(3), 614-628.
DeMars, W. E., & Dijkzeul, D. (2020). The NGO challenge for international relations theory.
Routledge.
Dupuy, K., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2016). Hands off my regime! Governments’ restrictions on
foreign aid to non-governmental organizations in poor and middle-income countries.
World Development, 84, 299-311.
Edwards, M. (2019). Civil society. Polity Press.
Fagan, A. (2020). Human rights and cultural diversity: Core issues and cases. Edinburgh
University Press.
Fox, J. A. (2020). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World
Development, 50, 255-269.
23
Gulrajani, N., & Swiss, L. (2018). Why do countries become donors? Assessing the drivers and
implications of donor proliferation. Journal of Development Studies, 54(12), 2295-
2314.
Gunter, M. M. (2019). The Kurds and regional security: An evaluation of developments since the
Iraq war. Third World Quarterly, 36(4), 679-691.
Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2020). Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights
enforcement problem. International Organization, 62(4), 689-716.
Hale, T. N. (2018). Transnational actors and transnational governance in global environmental
politics. Routledge.
Haynes, J. (2019). Religion, secularisation and politics: A post-secular perspective. Third World
Quarterly, 40(1), 1-15.
Hopgood, S. (2018). The endtimes of human rights. Cornell University Press.
Iriye, A. (2020). Global community: The role of international organizations in the making of the
contemporary world. University of California Press.
Kaldor, M. (2018). Global civil society: An answer to war. Polity Press.
Katzenstein, P. J. (2018). Civilizations in world politics: Plural and pluralist perspectives.
Routledge.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (2020). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in
international politics. Cornell University Press.
24
Kim, H. J. (2019). The rise of international non-governmental organizations: A top-down or
bottom-up process? Journal of International Organizations Studies, 10(2), 29-42.
Kingsbury, D., McKay, J., Hunt, J., McGillivray, M., & Clarke, M. (2018). International
development: Issues and challenges. Palgrave Macmillan.
Krasner, S. D. (2018). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.
Lewis, D. (2018). Non-Governmental Organizations, management and development. Routledge.
Martens, K. (2018). NGOs and the United Nations: Institutionalization, professionalization and
adaptation. Palgrave Macmillan.
McGann, J. G. (2019). The global “Go-To Think Tanks” annual report. University of
Pennsylvania.
Meyer, J. W., & Bromley, P. (2020). The worldwide expansion of “organization”. Sociological
Theory, 31(4), 366-389.
Naucke, P. (2019). Transnational advocacy and human rights in the digital age. International
Journal of Human Rights, 23(3), 456-473.
Okafor, O. C. (2020). The African human rights system: Activist forces and international
institutions. Cambridge University Press.
Otto, D. (2018). Queering international law: Possibilities, alliances, complicities, risks.
Routledge.
Peruzzotti, E. (2019). The rise of human rights regimes: A comparative analysis. Human Rights
Quarterly, 40(2), 355-379.
25
Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (2018). The persistent power of human rights: From
commitment to compliance. Cambridge University Press.
Schmitz, H. P., & Sikkink, K. (2020). International human rights. In Oxford Research
Encyclopedia of International Studies. Oxford University Press.
Smith, J., Chatfield, C., & Pagnucco, R. (2019). Transnational social movements and global
politics: Solidarity beyond the state. Syracuse University Press.
Spector, R. H. (2019). International human rights law and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Steffek, J., & Hahn, K. (2020). Evaluating transnational NGOs: Legitimacy, accountability,
representation. Global Society, 24(2), 217-230.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). Globalization and its discontents revisited: Anti-globalization in the era of
Trump. W.W. Norton & Company.
Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jönsson, C. (2018). The opening up of international
organizations: Transnational access in global governance. Cambridge University
Press.
Thakur, R. (2019). The United Nations, peace and security: From collective security to the
responsibility to protect. Cambridge University Press.
Wapner, P. (2019). Environmental activism and world civic politics. SUNY Press.
Zarifis, I. (2018). International NGOs and global human rights: Voice, influence, and priorities.
Human Rights Review, 19(4), 383-400.
