1 / 353100%
DRUG ABUSE CRIME RECIDIVISM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF
SOCIAL CONTROL THEORY
Introduction
The times are progressing and the law is developing according to the needs of living
beings. Basically, the law is intended to create conditions in the social life of the community,
both small and large, so that there is harmony, order, solid legality, etc. However, people do
not follow the rules and break the rules, such as abusing drugs. However, humans do not
follow the rules and violate the rules, such as drug abuse. The abuse of narcotics is currently
worrying and wrenching the life of the nation.
Narcotics are basically two kinds of substances. The presence of these drugs is
needed in medicine, but they are widely abused.
This substance can be classified into 2 types, namely narcotics in the narrow sense
and narcotics in the narrow sense and narcotics in the broad sense. In the narrow sense are
all substances or materials that are natural, namely all medicinal substances such as opiates,
cocaine, and marijuana. In a broad sense are natural and synthetic (artificial), namely all
medicinal materials derived from:
Papaver somniferum (opium, opium, morpin, heroin, etc.);
Eryth Roxylon Coca (cocaine);
Cannabis sativa (marijuana);
Tranquilizers;
Group of stimulant drugs;
A class of delusion-inducing drugs.
The progress of a nation in the future can be seen from the condition of the younger
generation today. They will be the heirs of the older generation and will color the earth of
United States. If today's young generation is a quality generation, it is certain that they will
grow into good citizens and raise the degree of the future. If the youth of today are reliable
human resources, then there is much hope that they will grow up to be wise leaders of the
country. On the other hand, if today's young generation is a coplo generation, then it is
difficult to maintain its own life, let alone become the successor to the struggle of its parents.
Every day, their bodies are getting thinner and thinner due to disease and the effects of
drugs. Other diseases join in to make a prolonged complication. To stay alive, he needs the
help of others.
Narcotics abuse is a very dangerous thing, because in addition it will bring influence
to the personal self of the user where he will be addicted and his life will depend on narcotic
substances, which if not prevented (treated), the type of narcotics that will be used is getting
stronger and the dose is getting bigger, so that for him it will get worse. The user will do
anything to fulfill, if it happens that the user has enough money, it may not bring other
effects outside his person and even the user can not be caught (still be able to hide) but if
drug addicts do not have enough money to fulfill their addiction continuously, the
consequences will be widespread, not only for themselves but also for society, because users
who at the time of addiction cannot meet their needs from their own money or goods, they
will try in various ways, which are not impossible to commit acts that include crime.
The issue of narcotics abuse is increasing with the smuggling, trafficking and illicit
trade, abuse and is followed up with arrests, detention of abusers and drug dealers. Efforts to
overcome the problem of narcotics are not sufficient in one way but must be carried out with
a series of continuous actions from various elements, both from government and non-
government institutions. The series of actions includes efforts that are preventive, repressive
and rehabilitative. Rehabilitation is one of the government's efforts in tackling drug abuse.
Implementation of rehabilitation is the realization of a rule, this is very important
because with an implementation it can be seen whether a rule has actually been implemented
or not. Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics has provided different treatment for
drug abusers, before this law came into force there was no different treatment between users,
dealers, dealers or producers of narcotics. Narcotics users or addicts on the one hand are
perpetrators of criminal acts, but on the other hand are victims.
The reality shows that sentencing by judges in drug cases is still not effectively
implemented. The vast majority of drug abusers are not sentenced to Even though the
provisions of the Law guarantee the regulation of rehabilitation efforts, both medical
rehabilitation and social rehabilitation for narcotics abusers and addicts. In the Narcotics
Law, the legal provisions governing the rehabilitation of drug addicts are regulated in Article
54, Article 56, Article 103, and associated with Article 127 of the Narcotics Law. The
interesting thing in the Narcotics Law is found in Article 103 where the judge's authority to
impose a sentence/sanction for someone who is proven to be a narcotics addict to undergo
rehabilitation.
Recidivism in general understanding is understood as a broad term that refers to the
relapse of criminal behavior, including due to a rearrest, reconviction, and reimprisonment.7
Recidivism or repetition of narcotics crimes is regulated in Article 144 paragraph (1) of Law
Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics which states that every person who commits a
repetition of narcotics crimes as regulated in Articles 111 through 129, the maximum
penalty is increased by 1/3 (one third). Recidivism usually occurs because there is no
deterrent effect obtained by the perpetrator. Recidive in the Criminal Code is not regulated
generally in the "General Rules" of Book I but is regulated specifically for a certain group of
criminal offenses, both in the form of crimes in Book II and offenses in Book III. In
addition, the KUHP also requires a certain period of recidivism. Thus, the KUHP adheres to
the Special Recidive system, meaning: "the aggravation of punishment is only imposed on
the repetition of certain types of criminal offenses (crimes/offenses) and which are
committed within a certain period of time.
In general, criminology aims to study crime from various aspects. In addition,
criminology aims to develop a unity of general and detailed basics and other types of
knowledge about the legal process, crime and reactions to crime. One of the concrete
objectives is to provide input for law enforcement officials in the process of law
enforcement and prevention of non-penal crimes, especially crime Police.9 Drug abuse is a
crime, which criminologically is categorized as a crime without victim, this crime is not
defined as a crime that does not cause victims but has the meaning that the victim of this
crime is himself. In other words, the user is also the victim of the crime.
Theoretical Study
Criminology is a science that studies crime from various aspects; which was born as
a science in the 19th century. The name criminology was first proposed by P. Topinord
(1830-1911), a French anthropologist. Criminology consists of two syllables, namely the
word crime which means crime and logos which means science, so criminology can mean
the science of crime. The definition included in "criminology" shows that this science is not
intended to study how to commit crimes, but "crime" is studied in order to overcome it. In
the opinion of W.A. Bonger, criminology is a science that aims to investigate the widest
possible symptoms of crime.
Recidivism is a term in law for the type of crime that cannot be stopped but can only
be prevented, such as a type of disease that cannot be treated and can only be prevented.12
According to Sutanti, the definition of recidivism which is referred to by the Criminal Code
as "repeated crimes / repetition of criminal acts" is regulated scattered in book II and book
III of the Criminal Code.13 Recidivism is the behavior of a person who repeats a criminal act
after being sentenced by a judge's decision that has permanent legal force because of a
criminal act that has been committed earlier. A person who often commits criminal acts, and
because of his actions has been sentenced to punishment and even more often sentenced to
punishment, is called a recidivist.
The definition of crime as an element of criminality sociologically has 2 elements,
namely: Crime is an act that is economically detrimental and psychologically detrimental
and hurts the moral feelings of a group of people, where these people have the right to give
birth to reproach. Thus, the notion of criminality is all kinds of economically and
psychologically harmful actions and deeds that violate the laws of the State of United States
as well as social and religious norms.
One of the focuses of the government in eradicating and following up on criminal
acts is narcotics. In Greek, narcotics means "narke" which means being drugged and not
feeling anything.14 Hariyono explained that narcotics comes from the word "narcissus"
which means a type of flowering plant that can make other people faint. As explained in
Law number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics in article 1 paragraph 1 explains that narcotics
are drugs even those derived from chemical substances or plants, both semi-synthetic and
synthetic. Can change or eliminate or reduce pain and can trigger excessive addiction. The
meaning of the name Narkoba itself is narcotics, psychotropic substances, and other
addictive materials.
Research Methods
The problem approach used by the author in this research is an empirical juridical
approach method supported by a Normative juridical approach. The data sources used in this
research are taken from primary data and secondary data. Primary data is the main data
obtained directly from the research subject and/or research location, namely at the Metro
Police by conducting interviews with relevant and authorized sources.
Secondary data consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Primary
legal materials: Law Number 1 of 1946 jo Law Number 73 of 1958 concerning the
Enactment of the Criminal Code (KUHP), Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.
Secondary legal materials are sourced from legal materials that complement primary legal
materials such as theories of experts, reports, draft legislation (Criminal Code Bill), Metro
District Court Decision Number 146/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Met, Government Regulation
Number 44 of 2010 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning
Narcotics and other written sources related to the problem. Tertiary legal materials are
materials sourced from various kinds of references, such as books or legal literature, legal
dictionaries and other sources derived from online media.
The resource persons in this research are Investigator of Satresnarkoba Polres Metro,
Investigator of National Narcotics Agency Metro City, Lecturer of Criminal Law Section of
Faculty of Law Unila, Recidivist of Narcotics Abuser in Detention House of Polres Metro.
Data collection procedures: primary data collection techniques and secondary data collection
techniques. Primary data is obtained through interviews with research subjects. Secondary
data is collected by reviewing through literature studies such as laws and regulations, books
or literature, and journals. The methods used in this data processing procedure are data
selection, data classification, and data systematization.
Data analysis in this study used qualitative data analysis. This method is done by
describing in the form of explanations and descriptions of sentences that are easy to read and
understand to be interpreted and conclusions drawn to answer research problems.
Results And Discussion
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Factors Causing Recidivist Offenders of Drug Abuse Crimes
Technically, the term crime is only used to indicate acts that are declared by law as
criminal acts, but for criminology there must be freedom to expand its study beyond the
limits of the juridical definition, not only to be used as a guide in exploring what is seen as a
crime.101 Crime is defined as any violation of acts prohibited by criminal law, criminals are
everyone who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of an individual's free choice in
assessing the costs and benefits of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response
given by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained
from crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes. In this regard, the task of
criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize the
occurrence of crime.
Crime is defined as any violation of an act prohibited by criminal law, a criminal is
any person who commits a crime. Crime is seen as the result of the free choice of individuals
in assessing the profit and loss of committing a crime. Therefore, the rational response given
by society to this is to increase the losses to be paid and decrease the benefits obtained from
crime so that people do not choose to commit crimes to commit crimes. In this relationship,
the task of criminology is to create patterns and test punishment systems that can minimize
crime.16 Narcotics according to Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009
concerning Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both
synthetic and semisynthetic which can cause decreased and changes in consciousness, loss
of taste, reduce to eliminate pain and can cause dependence. It can be said that, on the one
hand narcotics are drugs or materials that are useful in the fields of medicine, health services
and the development of science. But on the other hand, it can cause dependence which is
very detrimental if used without strict and careful control and supervision. In this case, when
viewed from the juridical aspect, the existence of narcotics is legal. The Narcotics Law only
prohibits the use of narcotics not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. This
situation in its empirical order results in narcotics often being misused not for the sake of
interest and science but as a promising business in collecting coffers of money and growing
rapidly where this activity has an impact on the physical and psychological mental damage
of all levels of society. In terms of age, narcotics are not only enjoyed by the middle-aged
and old age groups. The spread of narcotics is no longer limited to the big cities but has been
into small towns and into sub-districts and even villages.
Frustration is also an important element in the internal factors of recidivism.
Individuals who tend to get frustrated quickly may be more prone to impulsive or aggressive
reactions, which can lead them down the path of criminal behavior. In addition, one's
personal character, which includes values, beliefs, and internal norms, can play a significant
role in shaping one's own criminal behavior.
It is important to remember that the internal factors of recidivism are complex and
often interrelated. Through a deeper understanding of these factors, efforts can be made to
develop more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the risk of
recidivism and promote positive social reintegration for offenders.
In addition to internal factors, there are also external factors that cause a person to
repeat the crime of drug abuse itself, including:
Environmental and Social Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, said that
environmental factors play a crucial role as one of the triggers for drug abuse recidivism.
These environmental factors include a number of dimensions which, when combined, can
contribute significantly to a person's tendency to re-engage in drug abuse behavior. In
addition, the availability of drugs in the surrounding environment has a major impact. An
active black market or drug abuse network can be a powerful attraction, increasing the
likelihood of a person re-engaging in substance use.
A poor social environment refers to a social context in which individuals interact on
a daily basis. In the context of drug abuse recidivism, this environment may include
communities or social groups where norms support or even sustain drug abuse behavior.
Peers, family, or coworkers who engage in these activities may create an atmosphere where
such actions are taken for granted or even considered a form of social acceptance.
The author argues that the wider the social circle, the greater the temptation to re-
engage in drug abuse. The wider the social network, the greater the exposure to norms that
may support drug abuse. Individuals may feel attracted or encouraged to reoffend because it
is perceived as a form of integration or even as a way to maintain a position in the wider
social environment. With a deeper understanding of the role of poor social environments and
how wider social circles can reinforce temptation, prevention and rehabilitation efforts need
to focus on improving the social environment.
Economic Factors
Difficulties in gaining access to economic resources, such as education and skills
training, can be a barrier to creating positive economic opportunities. Without adequate
support or training, individuals may be inclined to return to familiar pathways, including
drug abuse. In addition, a low or unstable socioeconomic environment can be a trigger for
recidivism. Factors such as poverty, lack of stable housing, and lack of access to health
services can lead to recidivism can increase the risk of individuals re-engaging in drug abuse
behavior.
The author argues that economic factors play an important role in drug abuse
recidivism. This is due to the urgency of a person's economic situation that makes the
individual commit acts that are prohibited by law. In this context, economic distress can
influence an individual's decision to break the law, regardless of the consequences that may
arise. In an effort to fulfill daily economic needs or create a temporary sense of well-being,
individuals can fall back into a cycle of recidivism, where the criminal act becomes a pattern
that is difficult to change.
Additionally, it is important to note that these economic pressures may shape patterns
of behavior related to drug abuse. Individuals may seek escape from the stress and burdens
of life by using drugs as a form of coping. Economic factors, therefore, are not only a direct
cause but may also contribute to the development of dependence and repeated engagement
in drug abuse behavior.
Information and Communication Technology Factors
Based on the results of the interview with Kresna Adi Prakasa, he said that currently
narcotics can be purchased through social media platforms, namely Instagram. Furthermore,
the development of information technology has provided easier and faster access to drug-
related information. Individuals who have a history of abuse can easily obtain information
about types of narcotics, how to use, and how to avoid legal detection. This can be a
precipitating factor that reinforces abusive behavior, especially if the individual has
unrestricted access to such information sources through digital devices and the internet. In
addition, digital communication platforms can play a role in facilitating drug transactions.
Communication through messaging apps and social media can be used to organize the
purchase or sale of drugs in a more confidential manner. This factor creates an environment
where individuals can communicate and transact without being detected by authorities,
increasing the potential for re-engagement in the drug trade. Information technology can
also play a role in building supportive communities or social networks drug abuse. Through
online platforms, individuals can connect with like-minded groups or communities, creating
an environment where drug-related norms and behaviors are accepted or even rewarded.
This can put additional pressure on individuals trying to avoid re-engagement.
The author argues that the role of information and communication technology (ICT)
factors in drug abuse recidivism is a challenge that arises along with technological advances.
While ICT brings great benefits in increasing connectivity and access to information, its
negative impact on drug abuse cannot be ignored. Easy access to drug-related information
and the ability to communicate confidentially through digital platforms create an enabling
environment for drug trafficking and consumption.
Family Factors
The role of the family in shaping values and behavioral norms is a key factor.
Families that lack support or have unhealthy communication patterns can create an
environment where a true understanding of the consequences of drug abuse is lacking. Lack
of restrictions or supervision from the family can allow individuals to re-engage in abusive
behavior without a sense of responsibility.
In addition, the level of emotional support from the family plays an important role.
Families that do not provide adequate support or do not provide a positive social network
may increase an individual's risk of re-engaging in harmful associations, which are often
triggers for drug abuse. An in-depth understanding of the role of family factors in drug abuse
is key to designing effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This involves building
supportive families and providing education about the consequences of drug abuse, as well
as providing the necessary economic and emotional resources to reduce the risk of
recidivism.
The author argues that the role of family factors as a cause of drug abuse recidivism
strongly emphasizes the importance of the family's role in shaping the family foundation of
an individual's values and behaviors. Families play a central role in providing individuals
with a proper understanding of the consequences of drug abuse. A family that provides
emotional support, healthy communication, and good supervision can be an effective shield
to prevent individuals from re-engaging in harmful behavior.
The process of examining the factors that cause criminal acts committed by narcotics
recidivists, the author will explain with social control theory which is the main theory and
also based on data from the research location studied by the author. Social control theory
seeks to answer why someone commits a crime, questioning why not everyone breaks the
law or why people obey the law. If it is related to drug crimes committed by drug abuse
crime recidivists, it is clear that someone has decided to choose whether he will commit drug
crimes or choose to obey the rules. When a person chooses to commit a drug crime, there is
already a causal influence on why he decides to make that choice.
Efforts to Counter Recidivism for Drug Abuse Crimes
Efforts or policies to prevent and control crime belong to the field of criminal policy.
This criminal policy is also inseparable from a broader policy, namely social policy, which
consists of policies or efforts for social welfare (social-welfare policy) and policies and
efforts for the protection of society (social-defense policy). Seen in a broad sense, criminal
law policy can cover the scope of policies in the field of material criminal law, in the field of
formal criminal law and in the field of criminal law implementation. Crime prevention can
be done by using non-penal means and penal means. Non-penal efforts are crime prevention
efforts that are preventive in nature, namely efforts to prevent the possibility of crime carried
out before a crime occurs. However, if prevention is interpreted broadly, repressive
measures in the form of punishment of criminals can be included so that the person
concerned and the community in general do not commit criminal acts.
Penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that are repressive (action) for lawbreakers
or criminals. So, this effort is carried out after the crime occurs by giving punishment to the
perpetrator of the crime. Criminal law countermeasures through penal means in regulating
society through legislation are essentially a form of policy. Efforts to overcome crime with
criminal law (penal means) focus more on efforts that are "repressive" or called penindsan /
suppression, after a crime or no crime occurs. In addition, in essence, penal means are part
of law enforcement efforts, therefore criminal law policy is part of law enforcement policy.
Based on data provided by Sastiawan Nunyai, there are 20 drug abuse recidivist
crimes that have occurred in Metro City.24 Crime prevention efforts, especially drug abuse
crimes, can be carried out in three ways, namely pre-emtif efforts (planning), preventive
efforts (prevention), and repressive efforts (prosecution).
Pre-Emptive Efforts (planning)
Pre-emptive efforts here are initial efforts made by the police to prevent criminal
acts. The efforts made in pre-emptive crime prevention are to instill good values/norms so
that these norms are internalized in a person. Even though there is an opportunity to commit
an offense / crime but there is no intention to do so, there will be no crime. So in this effort
the intention factor is lost even though there is an opportunity.
Based on the results of the interview with Emilia Susanti, said that pre-emotive
efforts actually influence the mindset of the community so as not to commit a crime, because
usually drug abusers are multi-age, multi-education, and multi-strata which are not only
teenagers or children who become perpetrators. The role of the community is also expected
to function optimally starting from family resilience, community resilience, and village
resilience. All parties in the environment starting from the Kelurahan, RW, to RT level must
have the same vision of how to echo or socialize to their smallest environment to stay away
from drugs. This can be done by holding positive sporting events, internalizing anti-drug
education in education, and agencies must be aware by holding anti-narcotics activities. The
cooperation of all parties is needed in making pre-emptive efforts against narcotics abuse,
for example by installing billboards and templates related to posters in strategic places.
Preventive Efforts (prevention)
Preventive efforts are a follow-up to Pre-Emptive efforts which are still at the level
of prevention before crime occurs. In preventive efforts, the emphasis is on eliminating
opportunities to commit crimes. Preventive efforts (prevention) are intended as an effort to
make positive changes to the possibility of disturbances in society, so as to create legal
stability. So in preventive efforts the opportunity is closed.
This preventive action is a better effort than efforts after the occurrence of a criminal
offense. Preventing crime is better than trying to educate criminals to be better. Better in the
sense that it is easier, cheaper, and achieves the desired goal. In fact, one of the principles in
criminology is to try to improve or educate criminals so that they do not repeat their crimes.
However, the ways of correcting or educating criminals need to be considered and directed
so that there is no recidivism.
After the counseling stage, the next step in preventive efforts is rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is divided into two main forms voluntary rehabilitation and compulsory
rehabilitation following law enforcement action. In this case, compulsory recidivists,
namely those who are re-engaged in drug abuse and arrested by law enforcement, have the
opportunity to undergo rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment, in accordance with
the provisions of Law Number 35/2009 on Narcotics.
Prevention strategies for this group involve a variety of methods, including
counseling, soft approaches, and education aimed at providing understanding on the risks
and negative impacts of drug abuse. These efforts may include special programs in schools
and colleges, as well as cooperation between educational institutions, government, and law
enforcement agencies. The aim is to provide accurate and thorough information to the
younger generation so that they can make wise decisions and avoid getting involved in drug
abuse. These prevention efforts may also involve the establishment of a supportive
environment, where families, schools, and communities jointly work to create norms that
prohibit drug abuse. Therefore, prevention efforts towards young people aim to build
awareness, provide knowledge, and create social support that can help prevent them from
falling into the dangers of drug abuse.
The author argues that preventive efforts against drug abuse recidivists have a very
important role in facing this complex challenge. Recidivists, who re-engage in drug abuse
after serving a previous sentence or rehabilitation, are a group that requires special attention.
Close cooperation between rehabilitation agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (BNN),
and law enforcement agencies is key to successfully implementing preventive measures
against recidivists. Effective information exchange between various parties can assist in
post-rehabilitation monitoring and guidance.
Repressive Measures
It is a program aimed at taking legal action against drug producers, dealers, dealers
and users. Repressive efforts are a conceptual crime prevention effort that is taken after the
crime has occurred. Countermeasures with repressive efforts are intended to take action
against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correct them so that
they realize that the actions they have committed are unlawful and detrimental to society, so
they will not repeat them and others will also not do so considering the sanctions they will
bear are very heavy.
This repressive effort includes the arrest of drug users. This step is taken to stop drug
consumption activities and provide a deterrent effect to individuals involved in abusive
behavior. Furthermore, drug couriers who are in charge of smuggling and distributing drugs
are also targeted for arrest. The arrest of couriers aims to break the distribution chain and
stop drug trafficking at the distribution level. Drug dealers, who are involved in distributing
drugs to end-users, are also targeted. The arrest of dealers aims to break the distribution
chain and reduce the access of drugs to the consumer level. Finally, arrests of drug dealers
aim to stop the supply of narcotics from the main source.
The author argues that the repressive approach has the potential to provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators, showing that violations of the law will not be left without
consequences. These measures can also provide a sense of security to the community by
reducing drug trafficking in their neighborhoods. The arrest of perpetrators, especially at the
level of drug distributors and dealers, is a necessary step to stop the flow of drug supply and
damage the organizational structure involved so as to reduce the recidivism rate of drug
abuse.
Based on the explanation above, there are 3 efforts that can be made, namely pre-
emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive efforts put forward
procedures on how to tackle drug abuse crimes by emphasizing public awareness of the
dangers of narcotics from the smallest to the largest scope and influencing the mindset of the
community so as not to commit a crime. This effort can also be done such as putting up
posters or billboards in places that can be used to prevent drug abuse strategic. However,
this effort cannot be made against this drug abuse recidivist offender. The mindset of the
perpetrator cannot be changed and has committed unlawful acts in the form of drug abuse.
The second effort is preventive efforts, this effort can be done to prevent drug abuse
crimes. This preventive effort is a better effort than the effort after the occurrence of a
criminal offense. This effort cannot be made against this recidivist perpetrator of narcotics
abuse, because the perpetrator has committed a criminal act of narcotics abuse. The
perpetrator has also been arrested when he has committed narcotics abuse.
The third effort is repressive efforts, this repressive effort is one of the conceptual
crime prevention efforts taken after the crime. This effort is the most prominent of the two
previous efforts, by emphasizing the arrest of drug abusers and providing aggravation of
punishment in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 144 of Law Number 35
Year 009 concerning Narcotics.
Conclusions
Factors that cause recidivism in drug abuse crimes are internal factors and external
factors. Internal factors include individual factors, which are influenced by various factors.
These consist of uncontrollable desire, behavior, eagerness to be praised, easy frustration,
and character itself. Individual behavior also plays an important role in the internal factors of
recidivism. External factors that cause a person to repeat drug abuse crimes include
environmental and social factors, economic factors, information and communication
technology factors, and family factors.
Efforts to overcome drug abuse recidivism that can be done to overcome these
crimes are through pre-emtif efforts, preventive efforts, and repressive efforts. Pre-emptive
efforts themselves emphasize instilling good values and norms so that they are internalized
into a person, as well as designing a prevention process for drug abuse. Furthermore,
preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still at the level of
prevention before the crime occurs, preventive efforts emphasize more on the
implementation of active prevention. The last effort, namely repressive efforts, is carried out
by emphasizing the implementation of law enforcement by law enforcement officials in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Families should pay more attention to the attitudes and social environment of their
relatives, as well as maintaining good and harmonious relationships within the family so as
to minimize the recurrence of drug abuse crimes. Narcotics abuse. Community participation
is expected to play an active role and provide full support for the implementation of
countermeasures carried out by the Metro Police Satresnarkoba and the Metro City National
Narcotics Agency. This support can be done by reporting to the authorities if they know of
any cases of drug abuse in their neighborhood.
Students also viewed