Children and youth involved with the juvenile justice system.
Children and youth involved with the juvenile justice system.
The Juvenile Justice System, acting as a sub-system of the Criminal Justice System, aims
to respond to unreasonable and unlawful behaviour of persons under the age of eighteen years.
This system is used not only for delinquent acts, meaning the offences that, if committed by an
adult, would be considered a crime, but for status offences also, which are legal only because the
offender is a juvenile, and these include truancy, underage consumption of alcohol and runaway.
Though the number of juveniles in arrests has significantly reduced from a predicted 2, From 7. 0
million in 1997 and standing at a 74% decrease in 2019, the system still manages to handle a
large number of cases. Currently, 423,077 delinquency cases are being adjudicated yearly, of
which 52% are accompanied by a delinquent verdict. Juveniles are referred for different types of
offences: person, property, drug, and public order; the adjudication rate differs slightly from one
of these categories to the other.
The outcomes of these offences and the consequent court decisions bring about
residential placements, which have also suffered similarly low rates. Thus, from 1997 to 2019,
the youth detention in residential placements was reduced to half, and commitments were
reduced to 73% and remain at the lowest level ever recorded. This decrement points to a new
trend emerging in the juvenile justice administration whereby there is an effort to reduce the
number of youths taken out of their homes and the acknowledgement of the fact that securing
confined youths costs over $ 588 a day or about $ 214620 a year for each youth (Youth.gov.
(n.d.)). However, the long-term issues are more critical from the detained youths' point of view
and comprise issues to do with population, emergence of violence, suicide cases and even death.
This means that measures that are opposite of incarceration and that seek to put emphasis on
other forms of punishment are vital in addressing these adverse effects. Also, gender, race, and
ethnicity gaps are witnessed, whereby female students undergo fewer severe adjudications and
placements than male students, and students of colour are equally overrepresented and treated
worse than their White counterparts. For instance, while analyzing the frequency of non-
Hispanic Black juveniles, of 100000 such juveniles, 315 were in residential placement as of
October 2019, 92 were Hispanic and 72 were non-Hispanic whites, implying the requirement of
the reform and the equality treatments needed for the juveniles detention systems.
Description of the Problem
Juvenile justice embraces the implication of children and young people in juvenile
delinquency, which is an aspect of society. It seeks to address the legal misbehaviour of young
people and how the justice system handles misdeeds. This problem impacts and targets
individuals, families, and communities; it increases the existing social gaps and inequalities,
making it a cyclical problem. Data obtained from juvenile solicitation by OJJDP revealed that
approximately 696620 juveniles were detained in the United States in 2019, boosting the issue's
significance (OJJDP, 2021). The justice system for juveniles is intended for reforming rather
than punishing them as they are not adults and do not assume responsibility like adults. For
instance, in Roper V. Simmons, the matter banned the state from executing any person convicted
of a crime when they were under eighteen. It changed the legal and social views towards juvenile
justice (Benekos & Merlo, 2019). CThis decision was based on the knowledge that juveniles are
diverse from adults in their psychological and emotional state. However, critics have pointed out
flaws in the justice system; there is discrimination based on race and socioeconomic status, and
for the parties involved, the long-term consequences might be aversive. Criminal justice
involvement can hinder education, family dynamics, and employment opportunities and result in
constant reoffending.
Effect on Individuals, Relatives, and Communities
Juvenile justice system impacts can be described as societal ones because, in many ways,
the individual, relatives, and communities touched by it pay the price of legal actions far beyond
straightforward determinate sentences. Sometimes the efficiency of the juvenile justice system is
proved by the fact that in recent years, the number of youth offences decreased considerably, but
the impact of these cases is still felt. Therefore, 13,800 children were either cautioned or
sentenced in the last year, which is down by 13% compared to the last year and down by 79%
from the number a decade ago. The first-time entrants to the system totalled 8000, which was
10% lower than the previous year's first-time entrants and 78% lower than the first-time entrant
recorded in March 2012 (Youth Justice Statistics: 2021). Crimes involving knives and other
dangerous tools committed by the children went down by a minor 2% with 3,500 cases of
offences, which is 3% less as compared to 2012. First of all, it is essential to emphasize that one
of the primary trends is that slightly over 70 per cent of children in custody seemed to receive
non-custodial dispositions; of those, 50 per cent were either acquitted or had their cases dropped.
Slight decrease from 221 to 217 days, the average time from offense to court completion
remains high, and it is 121% longer than in 2012. Moreover, the total average of the R.I. in
custodial terms also rose from 16 to 22 months, thus showing an increase of six months. This is
because it is an average period of time which may be distorted by a few longest cases among the
studied patients. Although the children in custody were about 450 this has reduced from last year
by 19 % and from 2012 by 77 %, but even so the rates have significantly affected families and
communities. Families experience the social costs as well as financial burdens of youth crimes
and imprisonments, and communities experience the impact of young people's crimes and
incarcerations. The findings demonstrate the need to sustain further change initiatives, which
would address the matters of youth imprisonment and extend better community solutions in
order to help affected persons and minimize these extensive changes.
The juvenile justice system has several hostile effects on the youth, including segregation
from public, scholastic disregard, and inadequate chances in the future. The psychological
consequences of partaking in the criminal behaviors may comprise stress, despair, anxiety, and
other mental health disorders such as depression. These feelings of shame do not confine their
social isolation to law enforcement but also to friends, classmates, and employers who ostracize
them. It can lead to social exclusion and decreased self-esteem, making it difficult for them to
reintegrate into society.
Families of such individuals also have to undergo distress, expenditure, and social
ostracization. It comes with several psychological impacts on families as parents and siblings
may develop feelings of guilt, shame, and helplessness regarding the condition of the affected
relative. The expenses of going through the court system can be surprisingly high, starting with
lawyers' fees, continuing with the cost of the trial, and, perhaps, lost income when a parent has to
take time off from work to accompany his/her child through the legal process.
It is also relevant to note that many communities are overrepresented in juvenile justice
for multiple reasons that are rooted in social and economic circumstances. Such communities
experience higher crime incidences, low levels of trust in the legal systems, and poor social
cohesion. Having a high percentage of justice-involved youths can help bring about social
acceptance of criminal behaviors, thus serving as a breeding ground for more delinquent and
violent individuals. The geographic clustering of justice-involved youth also leads to more
negative generations, as resources in the area are overburdened and opportunities for youth
development are scarce (Schwartz, 2019).
The social cost to the communities is high, with raised costs of law enforcement, social
services, and imprisonment. Additionally, because high rates of juvenile justice involvement led
to lower levels of social connectedness, communities may have less informal support for positive
youth development and safer environments for them. This breakdown of trust in the legal system
will potentially result in less compliance with the police and restricted engagement in community
activities, increasing social and economic inequality (Pickering et al., 2024). These areas of need
can only be met by a multipronged strategy, which encompasses primary prevention,
intervention services to families with the youths, and youth development that is strength-based
and community-driven.
Demographics of Those Affected
The effects of the juvenile justice system are not equal to all the demographical structures
involved or affected by this system. According to various reports, Racial and ethnic minorities,
especially African Americans and Hispanics, are overrepresented in the system. As of 2021,
black youth were 4.7 times as likely to be placed (i.e., detained or committed) in juvenile
facilities like their White peers, according to data collected across the United States in October
2021 and recently made public (The Sentencing Project, 2023). This gap has not changed
significantly in the past decade.
Socioeconomic status also has a significant influence, though youth from low S.E.S. are
overrepresented in juvenile justice systems. Such communities deny children an opportunity to
access quality education, mental health services, and other constructive programs and activities
that can act as a pull factor away from juvenile delinquency (Tamaraubibibogha Manfred
Gunuboh, 2023). Crossover youth, being those who are involved in both the systems of child
welfare and juvenile justice, are perhaps in the worst-off states. These children still suffer abuse
or lack proper care and end up in the juvenile justice system due to the behavior resulting from
trauma. Those who navigate both systems often experience disjointed services, varying quality of
care, and higher chances of reoffending, as 18% were found in adult probation compared to 7%
of those who did not have earlier contact with the juvenile justice system (Chapter 7, n.d).
Crossover youth are subjected to even more stigmatization and experience increased difficulties
in accessing education and mental health services, reproducing their vulnerable conditions.
Sex differences are also observed, with males comprising the most significant percentage
of juveniles arrested. Although the number of female participants in the system has risen, it is
usually associated with specific offenses, including running away and truancy. Different age
groups are involved in different ways and for different reasons, and younger children are less
likely to be involved in the system than older adolescents. However, early participation can
determine further engagement with the justice system in later years, which speaks to the
importance of early prevention and intervention.
Perceived Winners and Losers
The definition and characteristics of the social problem establish particular winners and
losers. First, society receives certain advantages from attempts to prevent juvenile delinquency,
decrease crime, and guarantee people's safety (Asif Farooq Zai & Wani, 2020). To some extent,
communities try to achieve the goal of preventing youths from participating in criminal activities
through the existence of a juvenile justice system, which contributes to the reduction of crime
rates and improvement of community safety. Police departments, attorneys, and businesses (i.e.,
private prisons) may also benefit from the system's existence through funding and employment.
That position guarantees employment, generates capital to fund the local economy, and sustains
several associated services.
On the other hand, the perceived losers are the youths involved in the system, their
families, and the community in which they live. These individuals tend to be impacted the most
by the systems' punitive elements, experiencing persisting detrimental effects, including limited
education and employment opportunities. Education is another area where incarcerated youths
are likely to experience disruptions, which results in low academic achievement and high
dropout rates. Also, having a juvenile record can make it more difficult to find employment later
in life, thus creating a cycle of disadvantage. Moreover, the assessment reveals that there
continues to be race and economic disparity in the application of the system, complicating the
problem among different ethnic groups. These disparities imply that minority and low-income
youth are more likely to be detained and subjected to more severe consequences, thus
perpetuating social inequalities and restricted mobility in society. Such differential treatment
serves to expose the systematic discrimination that still permeates the juvenile justice system, as
well as the need for repairing the systems for fairness in the handling of youthful offenders.
Federal Policy about the Social Issues
According to the Act 4 Juvenile Justice policies and procedures vary widely from state to
state and among local jurisdictions, creating a patchwork quilt of juvenile justice systems
resulting in inconsistent outcomes for youth, families, and communities, including youth
exposure to physical, mental, and emotional injury. The federal policy concerning the noted
inconsistencies is the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (Pub. L. No. 93-415, 42
U.S.C. § 5601 et seq.). In 1974, spearheaded by Statesman Birch Bayh, congress accepted the
JJDPA. Further, the new law withdrew children from adult jails and provided federal funds to the
states that omitted status offenses from the jurisdiction of juvenile court (Schwartz, n.d). Some of
the fundamental principles of the JJDPA include deinstitutionalization of status offenders,
confinement of juveniles separately from adult inmates, and reduction of racially discriminated
minority contact within the system.
In conclusion, the juvenile justice system of the United States of America is an
indispensable unit with an assessment of eradicating young children delinquency as well as
enhancing public safety. As an attempt at social rehabilitation rather than punishment, the system
manages to worsen social inequities when, in practice, it heavily impacts minority and low-
income populations. Youth involvement in the justice system produces significant psychological,
educational, and social consequences for the youth and their families. High numbers of youths in
the system financially burden communities and erode social capital, thus reinforcing cycles of
impoverishment. Crossover youth and those of color are over-represented, which underlines the
importance of employing the right reforms for better support and fair treatment for all. Federal
legislation such as the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act have key responsibilities
towards these problems. However, more attention and effort are still needed to provide the best
results for those involved or at risk. To address such challenges, there is a need to develop a host
of measures that include prevention, specific assistance to families that have been affected, and
the development of community-based programs that will offer a chance to at-risk youths.
References
Tamaraubibibogha Manfred Gunuboh. (2023). Parental Poverty and Neighborhood Conditions
as Predictors of Juvenile Crime Rates.COpen Journal of Social Sciences,C11(07), 287–318.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.117021
Asif Farooq Zai, & Wani, G. (2020, December 24).CJuvenile Delinquency: A Global Challenge
in Modern Society. ResearchGate; Hampstead Psychological Associates.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378856822_Juvenile_Delinquency_A_Global_C
hallenge_in_Modern_Society
Benekos, P. J., & Merlo, A. V. (2019). A decade of change: Roper v. Simmons, defending
childhood, and juvenile justice policy.CCriminal Justice Policy Review,C30(1), 102-127.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0887403416648734
Chapter 7. (n.d.). Juvenile justice and crossover youth in child welfare Child Welfare Challenge.
OJJDP. (2021, May 7).CYouth Arrests Drop to Lowest Level in 40 Years | Office of Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention. https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/news/juvjust/youth-arrests-drop-lowest-level-40-years
Pickering, S., Dorussen, H., Hansen, M. E., Reifler, J., Scotto, T., Sunahara, Y., & Yen, D.
(2024). London, you have a problem with women: trust towards the police in
England.CPolicing and Society, 1-16.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10439463.2024.2334009
Schwartz, R. G. (n.d.). The wheel turns Improving the Odds. Recreating a system of justice for
juveniles.
The Sentencing Project. (2023). Black Disparities in Youth Incarceration Black Youth Almost
Five Times as Likely to Be Incarcerated as White Peers.
https://www.sentencingproject.org/app/uploads/2023/12/Black-Disparities-in-Youth-
Incarceration.pdf
What is the JJDPA?. ACT4JJ. (n.d.). https://www.act4jj.org/what-jjdpa
Youth Involved with the Juvenile Justice System | Youth.gov. (n.d.). https://youth.gov/youth-
topics/juvenile-justice/youth-involved-juvenile-justice-system#:~:text=Adjudicated
%20Youth&text=Between%201997%20and%202019%2C%20the,decreased
%2073%20percent%20to%2021%2C141.
Youth Justice Statistics: 2021 to 2022 (accessible version). (2023, January 26). GOV.UK.
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/youth-justice-statistics-2021-to-2022/youth-
justice-statistics-2021-to-2022-accessible-version
