1 / 70100%
1
Section 1: Foundation of the Project
Complying with federal, state, and local taxes is vital in any business. Failure to
comply with tax law can result in heavy fines, legal proceedings, probability of being
audited, and damage to company reputations (Palupi & Putri, 2021; Tilahun, 2019).
Federal, state, and local governments rely heavily on taxes to carry out their duties
(Tilahun, 2019). While tax compliance is essential for businesses to operate legally
according to government guidelines, the process can be costly, and laws are difficult to
understand (Musimenta, 2020). Costs of compliance with federal, state, and local
regulations alone can be substantial for small firms, so some businesses choose to observe
only some. Tax laws and regulations that are constantly changing and complicated and
confusing can also challenge small business owners and affect tax compliance (Taing &
Chang, 2020). As such, business owners must strategize and implement effective tax
compliance strategies that minimize tax costs in order for business owners to meet
changes in tax laws and improve understanding of those laws. This qualitative pragmatic
inquiry involved investigating business owners’ strategies to comply with federal, state,
and local tax requirements.
Background of the Problem
Ensuring compliance with federal and state-local tax regulations is paramount in
the United States. The dynamic and intricate nature of tax legislation challenges
businesses to adhere with precision (Taing & Chang, 2020). Small business owners may
face considerable expenses in terms of meeting regulatory requirements, which can
compound difficulties involving ensuring adherence to tax laws. Moreover, the COVID19
pandemic compelled numerous enterprises to transition towards remote work, thereby
2
leading to payroll tax challenges. Business proprietors must acquaint themselves with tax
regulations in every state where their employees reside to ensure adherence to tax laws.
According to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS, 2022), sustaining and improving
taxpayers’ compliance is important because a small decline in compliance can cost the
United States billions of dollars of lost revenue, and it shifts the tax burden away from
those who do not pay their taxes to those who pay.
Business Problem Focus and Project Purpose
Businesses can pay heavy fines, face legal proceedings, and damage company
reputations if they do not comply with federal, state, and local tax laws. The IRS (2022)
estimated the average gross tax gap for business and employment taxes for 2014 and
2016 was 119 billion dollars. The general business problem is that small business owners
lack strategies to comply with federal, state, and local tax requirements, resulting in
paying tax penalties and fines as well as risking business suspension. The specific
business problem is some small business owners need strategies to comply with federal,
state, and local tax requirements. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative pragmatic
inquiry was to identify and explore practical strategies that small business owners use to
comply with federal, state, and local tax requirements.
The target population for this study was seven small business owners who
consistently complied with federal, state, and local business taxes for at least 5 years.
I used purposeful sampling techniques. Lefèvre et al. (2019) defined purposeful
sampling as capturing of data from participants who are experts in their fields and
describe in detail their experiences. Purposeful sampling helped improve selection of
participants.
3
The three primary research methods are qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods. Quantitative researchers focus on circumstances, make hypotheses, separate and
control variables, and use statistical tools to test variable relationships or group
differences (House, 2018). The qualitative method is appropriate when researchers
explore a phenomenon from participants’ perspectives. Mixed methods researchers
combine qualitative and quantitative techniques (Yin, 2018). In this study, I explored
business owners’ experiences using a semi-structured interview process. To address the
research question in this study, I used the qualitative method. This was appropriate for my
study because I explored a phenomenon from participants’ perspectives.
Qualitative research designs include phenomenology, ethnography, and pragmatic
inquiry. The phenomenological design is appropriate when researchers want to explore
participants’ experiences involving a specific phenomenon (Adams & van Manen, 2017).
Ethnographic researchers understand participant behaviors by addressing cultural and
social environments (Watson, 2018). The most appropriate research design for this study
was the pragmatic inquiry. House (2018) described pragmatic inquiry as an introspective
approach that involves eliciting data from semi-structured interviews. I used this research
design to interact directly with business owners, giving me a deeper understanding of the
phenomenon. I identified reasons for the phenomenon using interviews, observations, and
field notes from interviews.
The theory that grounded this study was the theory of planned behavior (TPB),
which was created by Ajzen in 1991. Researchers use the theory to explain why
individuals act rationally according to their attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived
behavioral control (Ajzen, 1991). This study involved facilitating, identifying, and
4
exploring strategies small business owners use to comply with federal, state, and local tax
requirements. Tax requirements are highly detailed and require structural approaches.
Business owners need to approach tax compliance rationally. The TPB was a means for
understanding these approaches .
Research Question
What effective strategies do small business owners use to comply with federal,
state, and tax requirements?
Assumptions and Limitations
Assumptions
According to Kane (2020), assumptions are statements that researchers assume to
be true without concrete evidence to support and verify them. In this proposed study, I
assumed participants created successful strategies to comply with federal state, and local
taxes. I also assumed participants understood taxes they needed to comply with. Finally, I
assumed participants answered interview questions honestly.
Limitations
Limitations refer to challenges and effects outside the researcher’s control that
restrict study depth (Hughes et al., 2019). Limitations involved identifying successful
participants who successfully navigated federal, state, and local tax requirements
consistently for 5 years, limited time to conduct an extensive study, and unbiased
responses to interview questions.
Transition
Section 1 included the foundation, background of the problem, purpose statement,
research question, assumptions, limitations, and delimitations. Section 2 includes an
5
indepth literature review on business and tax compliance. Section 2 also includes a
discussion of the conceptual framework and two alternative theories.
6
Section 2: The Literature Review
A Review of the Professional and Academic Literature
The main objective of my study was to determine successful strategies adopted by
business proprietors to comply with federal, state, and local tax requirements. I aimed to
provide an organized summary of relevant literature. I reviewed professional and
academic sources regarding federal, state, and local tax compliance frameworks for small
businesses. I comprehensively analyzed literature on the TPB and its applications to small
business owners’ strategies to comply with federal, state, and local tax regulations. I also
reviewed literature on small businesses, tax strategies, tax compliance, compliance costs,
business taxes, and tax structure. I relied primarily on peer-reviewed publications as
primary sources of literature. Search terms were tax, tax compliance, business tax
requirements, theory of planned behavior, tax awareness, tax morals, various forms of
taxes, compliance costs, sales tax, and excise taxes. I used the following databases:
Science Direct, ProQuest, SAGE Journals, Emerald Insight, EBSCOHost, Google
Scholar, and Walden Library.
Conceptual Framework
Ajzen’s TPB was the theoretical framework. According to the theory, intentions
shape human behavior (Ajzen, 1991). The theory of the planned behavior model has been
successfully used to address tax laws. This study involved examining variables that affect
small business tax compliance using the TPB behavior as the conceptual framework.
Theory of Planned Behavior
The TPB is used to predicts people’s intentions to engage in certain behaviors at
certain times, places, and circumstances. It is a psychological theoretical framework that
7
presupposes intentions are critical for predicting human behaviors, and people have
volitional control over their behavior (Ajzen, 1991; Bellová & Špírková, 2021; Taing &
Chang, 2020). As such, the intention to engage in a given behavior underscores the
increased probability of performing that behavior: The behavior is more likely to be
performed when there is a stronger intention (Ajzen, 1991). The TPB is used to explain
human behavior in specific contexts as either positive or negative (Ajzen, 1991; Bellová
& Špírková, 2021). Therefore, the essential pillar of the TPB is intention since
motivational factors determining a person’s behavior are difficult to establish without it.
The three components of the TPB are attitude toward the behavior, subjective norm, and
perceived behavioral control (Ajzen, 1991). The TPB can be used to justify intentions and
provide precise explanations concerning tax compliance behaviors among those who are
legally obliged to pay taxes, as demonstrated by their attitudes towards behaviors.
Attitude
Attitude plays a role in shaping human thoughts, emotions, and actions. Bellová
and Špírková (2021) articulated attitude is a function of salient behavioral beliefs that
lead to perceived likely outcomes of behaviors. Brownstein et al. (2020) argued attitude
can be measured explicitly or implicitly as well as directly or indirectly to predict
peoples’ behavior. Attitude shows the level to which people have a supportive or
unsupportive assessment of behaviors of interest. Ajzen (1991) stated attitude formation
involves cognitive or information processing and is anchored in people’s beliefs
regarding the object of the attitude. Analytically, beliefs are formed about objects by
linking them to specific attributes. Therefore, attitude towards behavior impacts tax
compliance. When taxpayers believe outcomes of paying taxes are favorable or
8
unfavorable to their interests, they have positive or negative attitudes toward tax
compliance.
Attitude Towards Behavior and Tax Compliance
Business owners comply with their tax obligations when they have positive
attitudes toward paying taxes. The belief that paying taxes has beneficial outcomes for
them and society is sufficient motivation. People learn to automatically prefer behaviors
with desirable outcomes and form negative attitudes toward behaviors they associate with
undesirable outcomes (Ajzen, 1991). Taxpayers must first understand paying taxes is a
behavior that will produce anticipated desirable outcomes. Taing and Chang (2020)
articulated in the context of tax compliance, people pay taxes when they have high tax
morale, which is intrinsic motivation to pay taxes in order to contribute to societal
development. Taxpayers voluntarily pay taxes even in environments with low tax
enforcement because of intrinsic motivation that paying taxes is an obligation (Taing &
Chang, 2020). Hence, tax morale positively impacts tax compliance behaviors. There is a
negative correlation between tax morale and tax compliance behavior because low tax
morale is an attitude that undermines tax compliance behavior.
Low tax morale is associated with noncompliance because taxpayers feel morally
not obliged to commit to their tax obligations. False beliefs about tax laws and absence of
trust in tax administrators may lead to a lack of moral obligation. Jones and Cater (2020)
stated attitudes and beliefs instigate behavior, and behavior defines environments. Hence,
in a tax environment where tax laws are misunderstood, taxpayers may believe there is no
moral obligation to pay taxes. Even if they pay, they will not witness societal benefits of
tax-paying behaviors (Jones & Cater, 2020). Abdu and Adem (2023) stated attitudes
9
towards noncompliance result when taxpayers fail to file tax returns, underreport taxable
incomes, fail to pay tax liabilities in time, and overstate tax deductions and exemptions.
Given this, attitude towards noncompliance behavior may demonstrate lack of confidence
in tax administrators and corruption in government. When taxpayers believe their taxes
are not invested in nation-building and societal good, they have low tax morale.
Subjective Norms
External pressures can influence business owners to exhibit tax compliance
behaviors. Subjective norms include perceived social pressures to engage or not engage
in given behaviors (Ajzen, 1991; Taing & Chang, 2020). People’s normative beliefs
impact subjective norms and motivations to comply with given behaviors. A subjective
norm in the context of tax compliance is level of fairness in terms of tax infrastructure, as
well as level of trust taxpayers have in governments (Taing & Chang, 2020). Al-Rashdan
and Al-Zaqeba (2020) stated perceptions of tax authority plays a fundamental role in
determining whether taxpayers should perform or not perform behaviors. Therefore, if
taxpayers perceive taxing bodies are accountable and transparent in terms of using tax
revenues, they will trust the system and be compliant (Taing & Chang, 2020).
Conversely, noncompliant attitudes and behaviors among taxpayers occur when there is a
perception that taxing bodies are less fair (Taing & Chang, 2020).
Subjective Norms and Tax Compliance
Tax fairness involves functional beliefs that indicate whether taxpayers should or
should not participate in and approve or disapprove of behaviors. Taing and Chang (2020)
argued taxpayers voluntarily pay taxes when they perceive taxing bodies as fair to them.
Tax fairness includes horizontal fairness, which means peer groups should have an equal
10
share of the tax burden, distributive fairness, which implies fair distribution of costs and
advantages in terms of tax payment systems, procedural fairness, which involves fair tax
collection from all taxpayers, and fair treatment of taxpayers in terms of lack of coercive
power to impose penalties and auditing (Taing & Chang, 2020). Tax compliance among
taxpayers in Nigeria, Jordan, and Malaysia was positively influenced by procedural
fairness (Al-Rashdan & Al-Zaqeba, 2020; Taing & Chang, 2020). Therefore, when the
taxation system is fairer, taxpayers are more likely to engage in tax compliance intentions
and behaviors, which can also be replicated when there is trust in government taxation
authorities.
Tax compliance behavior is positively associated with trust in government.
Taxpayers may only comply with their tax obligations when there are equal exchanges
between fiscal expenditure and taxes collected. Taing and Chang (2020) explained that
the level of taxpayers’ trust in government impacts their compliance with taxation
requirements. For example, suppose taxpayers perceive that their tax revenues are
efficiently utilized and that taxation bodies are open and transparent. In that case, they
will trust the government more and show tax compliance behaviors (Taing & Chang,
2020). Albab and Suwardi (2021) investigated the relationship between trust in tax
authority and tax compliance among micro, small, and medium enterprises in Indonesia.
They found that trust had a positive influence on voluntary tax compliance behavior.
Similarly, Alshira’h (2023) examined the association between trust in government and
compliance with value-added tax (VAT) in the Jordanian retail industry and established
that trust in government positively impacted VAT compliance behavior. Hence, with
11
improved trust in government, taxpayers will exhibit greater tax compliance intention and
pay taxes the government imposes following perceived behavioral control.
Perceived Behavioral Control
Elements that taxpayers may consider as influential to their obligation to pay tax
may enhance or impede taxation behavior. Perceived behavioral control is the
instinctively detected ease or complexity of undertaking behaviors considering past
experiences, anticipated impediments, and objective and subjective obstacles (AlRashdan
and Al-Zaqeba, 2020; Ajzen, 1991; Taing & Chang, 2020). Perceived behavioral control
factors, such as resource availability, time capacity, and information, may vary across
actions and situations. The variances determine taxpayers’ perceptions depending on their
tax environment. Ajzen (1991) and Taing and Chang (2020) say that TPB's perceived
behavioral control component is crucial since it introduces psychological elements, such
as the power of authority, tax complexity, and tax information, to the control of behavior
and how it impacts intentions and actions.
Therefore, the outcomes of an action are influenced by people’s perceived behavioral
control. Tax compliance behavior may be impacted by how perceived behavioral control
utilizes the power of authority, tax complexity, and tax information.
Perceived Behavioral Control and Tax Compliance
Power of authority, tax complexity, and tax awareness are critical instruments
determining taxpayers’ behavioral intention to comply with taxes. Taing and Chang
(2020) say that the power of authority denotes the capacity of the government to employ
coercive power, punishment, and prosecution to enforce tax compliance. Given this,
governments enforce tax compliance using legitimate power, which taxpayers may
12
consider accommodative or coercive. Accommodative power positively impacts enforced
compliance, but enforced compliance may increase the number of taxpayers evading tax
(Taing & Chang, 2020). Besides, complex tax systems may undermine the capacity of
taxpayers to comply with tax obligations because of increased barriers and compliance
costs (Taing & Chang, 2020). Concerning tax awareness, where taxpayers have a limited
understanding of tax laws, their ability to comply diminishes (Taing & Chang, 2020).
AlRashdan and Al-Zaqeba (2020) studied how perceived behavioral control in the context
of the power of authority impacted the behavioral intention to pay taxes in Jordan. They
found that it positively affected the behavioral intention of high-income earners to
comply with tax laws. Thus, increased power of authority increases tax compliance
intentions. Additionally, reduced tax complexities and increased tax awareness promote
the behavioral intention of complying with tax obligations. As demonstrated in attitude
towards the behavior, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control elements of
TPB, there should be a correlation between intention and compliance with the taxation
regime.
Intention and Compliance
Most people intend to engage in a given behavior if they believe the outcome will
be valuable. The more favorable attitude towards the behavior and the stronger subjective
norm associated with it, the higher the perceived behavioral control and the greater the
intention to undertake the behavior under consideration (Ajzen, 1991; Bellová &
Špírková, 2021). Hungenberg et al. (2020) suggested that intentions, their connections to
behaviors, and the impact of environmental circumstances are all areas of study in
psychology and neuroscience. Therefore, the three components of the TPB are jointly
13
responsible for predicting tax compliance intention and behavior. People with both will
be more likely to act than those without both but will have less perceived behavioral
control. Intention focuses on human thought, psychology, and motivation. Behaviors
involved in determining actions may have social or personal benefits, such as paying
taxes with the hope that the government utilizes the taxes effectively to contribute to
societal development.
Intention and Tax Compliance Behavior
Tax administrators must understand the correlation between intention to act and
taxpayer behavior. Abdu and Adem (2023) and Alshira’h (2023) emphasized the
importance of taxpayers fulfilling their legal tax obligations as part of responsible
behavior. Hence, taxpayers will be inclined to pay taxes voluntarily when there is fairness
and trust. Bani-Khalid et al. (2022) explained that factors such as fairness, trust, moral
principles, and perceived cost of non-compliance impact tax compliance behavior.
Therefore, favorable factors that increase tax morale, fairness, and trust promote tax
compliance behavior. In contrast, unfavorable factors that reduce attitudes towards
subjective behavior undermine tax compliance behaviors. Given this, taxpayers’
compliance with tax can be promoted through favorable tax regimes, incentives, positive
enforcement, and a culture of compliance.
Behavior
TPB stresses actual behavioral control as the product of attitude, subjective norm,
and perceived behavioral control. Lee and Chen (2021) explicated behavior as an
organism’s response to internal and external stimuli. Behaviors exhibit interactions,
worldviews, and partnerships. Krautkramer et al. (2021) indicated that interactions
14
between the internal and external environments may complicate human behaviors.
Therefore, people’s propensity to exhibit voluntary and involuntary behaviors concerning
compliance anchors on the tenets of TPB. As such, compliance behaviors follow
predetermined standards set by authority or social norms (Hattke & Martin, 2020). Thus,
subjective norms, attitudes, and perceived behavioral control may pile social pressure that
compels individuals to comply or not comply with tax obligations.
Behavior and Tax Compliance
Behavior and tax compliance behavior are intertwined because the latter
requirements determine how taxpayers behave. Since tax compliance is the fulfillment of
legal tax responsibilities, taxpayers will demonstrate intentions and behavior to pay taxes
when they believe that tax authorities are accountable for the tax money (Abdu & Adem,
2023). Carrillo et al. (2021) posited that compliance behavior is more likely to be
repeated if individuals receive rewards. Hence, when taxpayers understand rewards
associated with fulfilling tax responsibilities, such as contribution to society, fairness,
trust, and reduced compliance costs, they will be obliged to show the intention and
behavior of tax compliance.
The review showed how the attitude towards the behavior, subjective norm, and
perceived behavioral control elements of TPB set the favorable or unfavorable
environments. These environments determine taxpayers’ compliance or non-compliance
with tax obligations. Equally important in understanding taxpayer compliance with tax
requirements are alternative theories, such as the Theory of Deterrence and the Theory of
Fraud Triangle. These alternative theories also provide a lens to view my research
question.
15
Alternative and Complementing Theories
The alternative theories I utilized as conceptual frameworks for this study are the
Theory of Deterrence and the Fraud Triangle Theory. The following section of the review
describes the two alternative theories. The description demonstrates how they contribute
to comprehending business owners’ strategies to comply with federal, state, and local tax
obligations.
Deterrence Theory
Deterrence Theory emerged from criminology as a response to the perceived
inadequacy of the traditional approaches to criminal punishment. Optimal, general,
classical, and economic deterrence approaches evaluate law enforcement and tax
compliance (Ya'u et al., 2023). Ya'u et al. (2023) mentioned that the economic deterrence
approach focuses on the economics of crime. The theory presupposes that economic
factors influence taxpayers to decide whether to comply with tax obligations (Ya'u et al.,
2023). Gebrihet et al. (2024) added that the economic deterrence approach elucidates the
spectrum of taxpayer behaviors and examines how enforcement policies and conduct of
tax administrators discourage tax evasion. Hence, the examination revolves around the
decision-making process of compliance with tax requirements vis-à-vis the analysis of
potential benefits from compliance and personal costs of non-compliance (Gebrihet et al.,
2024). Therefore, compliance will be voluntary when potential benefits outweigh costs in
the context of penalties associated with general deterrence.
Punishment and sanctions form the foundation of the general deterrence approach
to tax compliance. The general view is that people are rational actors who evaluate their
actions, costs, and benefits (Kuo et al., 2020; Ya’u et al., 2023). Abramovaite et al.
16
(2023) suggested that if punishment is severe (length of imprisonment), specific
(detection rates and arrests), and celerity (speedy justice), rational people will assess
gains and losses before participating in illegalities. In the context of taxation, tax rates,
the probability of detecting tax evasion, and the severity of punishments are examples of
severity, certainty, and celerity that determine taxpayers’ decision-making behavior
(Abramovaite et al., 2023). Thus, adverse costs linked to tax evasion may be sufficient to
force taxpayers to comply with tax obligations. Given this, tax audits, knowledge of
taxation, complexities associated with taxation processes, and tax agents may be general
deterrence elements that can demotivate taxpayers from using the fraud triangle to
commit tax fraud.
Theory of Fraud Triangle
The concept of the fraud triangle was introduced in 1950 by Donald Cressey, a
criminologist who formulated this theory to comprehend the underlying motivations that
drive individuals to engage in fraudulent activities (Cressey, 1952). The Fraud Triangle
theory proposes a framework for understanding why individuals engage in fraud.
Sánchez-Aguayo et al. (2021) and Awang et al. (2021) explained that Donald R. Cressey,
an authority in the sociology of crime, proposed the Fraud Triangle Theory (FTT) in the
1950s to analyze why fraud convicts committed crimes. FTT has three elements:
pressure, opportunity, and rationalization (Awang et al., 2021; Sánchez-Aguayo et al.,
2021). Pressure is the first component of the FTT, which is related to the motivation to
participate in fraudulent activities; the perceived opportunity is the second component,
which explains the action behind the crime and the capacity to commit it; and the third
element is the rationalization of the act; which corroborates how people rationalize fraud
17
and make their illegal acts justified and acceptable (Awang et al., 2021; Sánchez-Aguayo
et al., 2021). The three elements of the FTT occur sequentially to promote the urge by
business owners to engage in crimes, including tax evasion, tax fraud, and tax
noncompliance.
Business owners can fail to comply with federal, state, and local tax obligations if
they capitalize on pressure, opportunity, and rationalization sequentially. Pressure,
especially financial distress, and financial incentives, may compel taxpayers to fail to
comply and ease the financial burden (Sánchez-Aguayo et al., 2021). Additionally,
taxpayers can exploit perceived opportunities, such as weak enforcement of tax laws and
a lack of deterrence (penalties) to pursue non-compliance with tax obligations. Finally,
taxpayers may use excuses, including lack of utility, tax complexities, and absence of tax
information, to rationalize non-compliance with tax obligations (Sánchez-Aguayo et al.,
2021). Wrong rationalization justifies illegal actions, and correct rationalization
condemns fraud (Awang et al., 2021). Therefore, FTT explicates how pressure, the
perceived opportunity to evade, and the capacity to rationalize the act sufficiently prove
or disprove taxpayers’ non-compliance behavior.
U.S. Tax Structure
A progressive tax structure can affect the revenue generated by a country, tax
system complexity, the tax burden imposed on different population groups, compliance
by individuals and businesses, entrepreneurial behaviors, and economic growth. Federal
tax laws have led to a comprehensive tax structure incorporating interesting elements of
progressivity, which aims to drive compliance behaviors in individual income and
corporate taxes. Conceptually, the term “tax structure” describes the patterns of division
18
of public revenues derived from multiple tax sources in a particular jurisdiction
(Yanikkaya & Turan, 2020). While describing this term, we must identify structural
features that distinguish taxes, including the legal definition of streams, different tax
bases, types and extent of deductions provided for different payers, exemptions, and
established tax rate schedules.
The U.S. tax structure is notably complex, encompassing various federal, state,
and local tax components. The progressive income tax system is a significant revenue
source at the federal level, with higher-income earners facing more significant tax
deductions, fostering income redistribution goals (Bastani et al., 2019). State income tax
deductions further contribute to government revenue, alongside value-added tax (VAT)
and excise tax, which impose levies on specific products and activities (Bastani et al.,
2019). Income taxes from gross salaries and consumption and excise taxes, particularly
burdensome for businesses, represent primary revenue sources with high compliance
costs (Vishnuhadevi, 2021). Additionally, the tax structure encompasses sales tax,
property levies, estate taxes, customs duties, corporate income tax, motor vehicle taxes,
and gift taxes (Vishnuhadevi, 2021). This intricate tax framework presents significant
challenges and implications for businesses and individuals.
Tax System
The U.S. tax law has provided a legal framework that has created a simple yet
notoriously complex tax system that emphasizes “voluntary compliance” in all taxpayer’s
situations. Blank and Osofsky (2020) noted that this voluntary system lifts the
responsibility of determining tax liabilities from the government and requires individual
taxpayers to perform self-assessments, calculate tax owed, and provide accurate reporting
19
of such information. Under this tax system, the government’s primary responsibility is to
provide clear and foolproof explanations of supposedly complex tax law to enhance
understanding and application by unsophisticated taxpayers to their respective situations
(Blank & Osofsky, 2020). Taxpayers must understand the explicit and implied meaning of
the legal terms that describe a voluntary tax system. In this context, the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) offers a legal definition of the term “voluntary” to imply a tax system that
allows individuals and businesses to take the obligation of calculating tax owed and
making accurate and appropriate returns from the onset, as opposed to waiting for the
government to take the initiative when forced by circumstances like noncompliance.
Previous studies have examined how certain factors facilitate or limit the
effectiveness of voluntary tax systems while drawing upon empirical evidence from an
MSME perspective. One such study by Albab and Suwardi (2021) revealed that tax
knowledge can influence the level of trust taxpayers maintain in their governments,
which mediates behaviors like voluntary tax compliance. A separate study by Hoang et al.
(2021) investigated compliance behaviors in SMEs showed that a manager’s expertise
and understanding of tax laws can impact voluntary compliance positively or negatively.
Consequently, these factors can affect taxpayers’ propensity to cheat, evasion, and tax
corruption. Unlike other tax systems that rely on enforcement methods to deter
noncompliance, a voluntary system offers a more effective mechanism to mitigate such
issues as taxpayer’s “crowding out, given that it positively affects their intrinsic
motivations to engage in voluntary compliance.
20
Federal Taxes
Tax administration and public revenue generation in the United States occurs at
three jurisdictional levels, starting with those considered at the federal level. Federal taxes
contribute the largest share of the total revenue contributions by employed persons,
businesses, and institutions. Federal taxes include direct taxes derived from personal
income for individuals working in various organizations, social security tax, corporate
income tax, VAT, and excise taxes (Yanikkaya & Turan, 2020). The IRS represents the
central agency mandated with various roles, including providing federal tax
administration and enforcement. Part of its tax law enforcement focuses on ensuring
compliance and collecting various federal taxes. Income taxes constitute a significant
component of the U.S. tax structure. Recent fiscal reports show that income taxes,
including revenues accumulated from individual payments and resident companies,
contributed approximately 60% of the cumulative federal revenues in 2021(IRS,2022).
Thus, federal income tax has more prominence than other sources in the government’s
fiscal structure, presenting significant practical implications for America’s growth and
citizen’s welfare. Another source of federal revenue is the social insurance tax, computed
as a sub-component of the labor tax in the payroll (Yazbeck et al., 2020). These federal
taxes have offered an effective means to finance health insurance programs and support
health reforms, enabling the U.S. government to make positive strides toward universal
health coverage.
The prominence of excise tax as a key contributor to federal revenue and a central
component in the fiscal structure cannot be overlooked. Ordinarily, the federal tax law
permits the national government to collect excise tax, which constitutes a special levy
21
collected at the POS for certain products. Based on the IRS interpretation of excise tax,
the key difference between this federal tax and VAT and other broad-based consumption
taxes is that the former is highly selective and specific (Boesen, 2021). Rather than
targeting all goods, federal excise tax has a narrow base and is restricted to specific items,
certain activities or uses, and select services. In 2019, the IRS reported a 2.9%
contribution to federal tax revenues from total taxes accumulated from excise goods
(Boesen, 2021). Predominantly, this included federal tax revenues resulting from specific
federal excise taxes charged on select goods, including alcoholic products, luxury
merchandise, petroleum goods, and tobacco, with an end goal of maximizing income and
promoting deterrence of potentially harmful behaviors and practices (Bankman et al.,
2023). The government recommends levying this tax at the starting point of the value
chain to reduce the compliance burden and enhance tax implementation by keeping the
number of taxpayers at a minimum.
State Taxes
The economic model maintained by the United States stresses jurisdictional fiscal
autonomy and economic decentralization, presenting opportunities for state governments
to establish and enforce tax policies independent from the existing federal tax system. In
other words, state governments exercise autonomy by introducing different taxes,
defining tax rates depending on macroeconomic circumstances and political forces,
abolishing certain taxes, issuing tax breaks when necessary, and establishing
apportionment rules (Fajgelbaum et al., 2019). The emphasis on fiscal autonomy across
the United States has led to a decentralized tax structure where each state can establish its
22
revenue bases, collect taxes, and decide on what rates to use independent of the federal
government.
Like the federal tax structure, state governments rely on multiple tax liabilities to
generate public revenue, from personal income taxes to sales levies and returns from
corporate income taxes. Many states have enacted laws that allow income taxation for
employed persons and businesses operating in these jurisdictions (Jensen, 2022).
Furthermore, Jensen (2022) pinpointed that, while these tax systems are not universal in
all U.S. states, public revenue accrued through income tax returns has become pivotal in
helping jurisdictions that apply them to spur development and reduce spatial differences
in resource allocation (Jensen, 2022). Other common state revenue bases include
corporate income levies, which target domestic firms engaged in profit-generating
business and sales taxes – broadly applied at the POS for various items traded or services
rendered. State governments in jurisdictions with functional sales tax systems and other
tax schemes assume important roles in collecting levies and providing necessary
assistance on tax-related matters to ensure compliance (Carrillo et al., 2021). Altogether,
state tax collections from individual and corporate income and other bases have proved
effective in accelerating development programs and reducing regional heterogeneity
caused by differences in spatial distribution and allocation of public goods.
Local Taxes
In addition to federal and state taxes, the United States considers local taxes an
important source of public revenue and a key driver of economic growth. Local taxes
provide an important avenue for regional governments to finance operating expenditures,
run programs to reduce economic inequalities, and meet their capital expenditures (Albab
23
et al., 2020). In the United States, local tax bases include direct charges local
governments enforce on utilities such as parking and business licenses. Besides, local
governments derive a substantial share of revenues from property taxes – representing the
biggest contributor – and other tax liabilities such as service charges, selective sales taxes,
and intergovernmental transfers. Property tax calculation in local neighborhoods across
the United States is based on assessed values for properties and effective tax rates
(ETRs) stipulated by local governments (Hayashi, 2020). In most cases, local
governments target individuals and small business owners who constitute the majority of
taxpayers in the local economy (Brennan & Rosacker, 2020). The current U.S. tax code
has eased the requirements for inventory accounting and reduced the compliance burden
by allowing local taxpayers to complete their payments through cash methods in place of
more restrictive tax accounting paradigms, which have previously contributed to
noncompliance behaviors.
Business Taxes
Businesses, from micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) to large
corporations, remain the largest contributors of taxable income in the American economy
at the federal and other jurisdictional levels. The tax compliance behaviors demonstrated
by domestic businesses and multinational firms in the United States can impact
considerably on the amount of revenue returns reported by the national and regional
governments (Gangodawilage et al., 2022). A growing literature has explored recent
trends in taxation strategies adopted by federal and regional governments to increase
dynamism and stimulate business activity in the U.S. economy. Some of these strategies
include reducing effective tax rates, providing other tax incentives, and implementing
24
place-based business policies to improve business access to tax credits. Furthermore,
Slattery and Zidar (2020) establish that business tax covers public revenue sources that
state and local governments consider in their structures, including corporate income taxes
and other levies imposed on resident commercial establishments in a particular
jurisdiction. Under the current tax system, the IRS requires that businesses provide
accurate tax reporting through Form 1099-K backed by payment receipts, which provides
a basis for validating information reports about taxable business incomes (Adhikari et al.,
2021). For practical reasons, current systems obtain business taxes to ensure that capital
gains from commercial activity undertaken by domestic enterprises contribute to the
economic development of the local economy.
Sales Taxes
Sales taxes refers to all levies charged by state and local governments on various
goods at the POS. Sales taxation also targets capital gains from different services
delivered to customers within a particular jurisdiction. In practice, a sales tax represents a
percentage measure of the price received on an item or a service by sellers rather than the
equilibrium price (Eisenhauer, 2022). As a corporate income tax component, a sales tax
focuses on all taxable sales a business makes within a definite period. However, it is
worth noting that sales tax rates enforced in different states or local contexts are more or
less similar to those adopted in other areas. In most cases, sales taxation is considered
non-salient, as the actual tax is not explicitly included as a component of the price
displayed on goods or attached to various services (Taubinsky & Rees-Jones, 2018).
25
Essentially, sales taxes provide an avenue for states and local governments to generate
revenues, increasing their fiscal capacity to address deficits and reduce fiscal imbalances
caused by heterogeneous federal funding allocations.
Use Taxes
A use tax is a special type of levy frequently used by regional governments to
capture revenue in areas where sales taxation did not take place during the original
purchase. For example, governments may subject this type of tax on retail goods
purchased by individuals from other states through e-commerce platforms or in person.
Kovacev (2020) postulates that the incidence of a “use tax” is clear-cut on who should
bear the compliance burden: an out-of-state retailer who sells specific goods or offers
certain services to consumers, whether online or through a physical shop. For instance,
Florida requires permanent and temporary residents in the state to complete Form
DR15MO every three months and remit a flat-rate 6% use tax on all items purchased
from other U.S. states if the total tax liability payable for such goods exceeds $1.00
(Jones, 2019). In this respect, some states define “use tax” as an alternative or
complementary compliance mechanism for sales tax liability, particularly when legal
avenues for sales taxation do not exist or are insufficient due to differences in state of
residence and geographical location where a purchase or consumption occurs (Jones,
2019). While use taxes are frequently debated in sales tax contexts, their design makes
them appreciably different from the latter, mainly by empowering state tax institutions
and providing them with additional authority to enforce tax liability and capture revenue
on items acquired, stored, or consumed outside states. In the existing business tax
scheme, a use tax is defined based on the geographic location where a customer
26
purchases and consumes a given product. As such, the tax liability for such items is owed
to state tax authorities when a person acquires an item from another state through a
process or transaction in which they do not remit the required sales tax, irrespective of
their legal residence.
Payroll Taxes
Against the backdrop of a growing number of retirees and an aging population,
the central government has given much importance to payroll taxation as a means to
cushion these vulnerable groups by expanding their coverage for social insurance funding
across the United States. Dörrenberg et al. (2022) described payroll taxes as “a function
of employee salaries and employers who assume the obligation of remitting the tax”
(p.2). While drawing upon empirical perspectives from previous studies exploring payroll
tax compliance, Dörrenberg et al. (2022) asserted that applying moral measures and other
strategies aimed at improving evasion deterrence can have a positive effect on payroll tax
compliance in the context of developing countries. With the U.S. tax system becoming
increasingly modernized, the mandate of collecting payroll taxes is left to the tax
department, which undertakes, among other roles, defining contribution rates and
engaging in collection activities to increase compliance, promote efficiency, and reduce
evasion (Tang & Feng, 2021). With payroll tax non-compliance issues becoming
increasingly prevalent across the country, such issues continue to threaten and constrain
the functioning and overall effectiveness of the U.S. welfare system, as aggregate
contributions forwarded to the tax department do not suffice the requirements for social
insurance funding, hence the need for stronger and robust mechanisms to enhance the
collection capacity.
27
Self-Employment Taxes
Under the U.S. tax structure, the government considers self-employment tax an
essential source of public revenue across jurisdictions. The payroll tax provides a
classical case of a tax model the government has extended to facilitate revenue collection
in self-employment contexts. The rapid expansion of the gig economy has seen a large
number of Americans becoming actively engaged in self-employment through online
work and various freelancing activities (Smirnova et al., 2022). Smirnova et al. (2022)
suggested that developments have pressured the government to develop an optimal
system to enhance tax collection and encourage contributions from the self-employed
population.
Novel administrative datasets reveal significant underreporting and income tax
evasion by self-employed persons, which has created heterogeneity in third-party
reported income and aggregate tax compliance (Bazzoli et al., 2020). Economic theorists
have shown much interest in developing a structural definition of self-employment tax
and exploring various factors contributing to evasion behaviors, mainly by drawing
perspectives on how governments enforce payroll taxes. However, the corollary of this
type of taxation for persons in self-employment has been largely neglected and
underexplored as a critical component of the American tax system until recently. Previous
research has stressed the need for a special tax regime that mirrors the realities and
background of self-employed workers to increase satisfaction and incentivize tax
compliance in this population (Smirnova et al., 2022). Measuring tax compliance
provides a promising way to detect income underreporting and discover other issues
contributing to tax cheating or evasion among self-employed persons.
28
Tax Compliance
The history of U.S. tax administration, enforcement, and compliance has been
nothing but a learning and constantly evolving process. Over the years, the IRS and
regional tax departments have departed from deterrence strategies used in the past to
more cooperative approaches and digitized methods to discourage avoidance tendencies.
Deterrence approaches used from the late 1940s through the 1950s, such as mandatory
enforcement, have been linked to high levels of avoidance due to crowding out among
taxpayers who feel compelled to fulfill tax obligations (Dularif & Rustiarini, 2022).
However, the shift to cooperative approaches that emphasize voluntary and collective
participation in tax contributions has led to increased trust in government, increased tax
citizenship behaviors, and promoted personal and social norms that increase tax
compliance.
With the rising pressure to close unaddressed tax gaps, governments worldwide
have moved toward taxation models that accentuate tax socialization to drive awareness
about compliance, tax schemes, and consequences of avoidance among individual payers,
MSMEs, and other enterprises. The newfangled tax compliance models anchor on
innovation to promote fairness in policy implementation and participation (Lestary et al.,
2021). Tax literature also indicates increased favorability and application of cooperative
approaches that guarantee transparency and provide procedural justice, highlighting the
significance of such methods promoting compliance, especially in VAT remittances (Siglé
et al., 2022). With the emergence of modern economies, marked by a transition from
brick-and-mortar contexts and globalization of commercial activities, the tax compliance
landscape has undergone radical transformations to mirror these changes. Today, the
29
government has become more invested in efforts aimed at expanding its remote taxation
authority and integrating highly networked supply chains to streamline and optimize
compliance (Adhikari et al., 2021; Belnap et al., 2023). Moreover, the new compliance
paradigms have heralded the shift from a conventional paper-based system to more
innovative and efficient electronic invoicing and remittances and increased emphasis on
third-party reporting over direct payments, providing strong incentives for individual and
institutional compliance (Bellon et al., 2022; Fahriyah et al., 2022). Effective deployment
of these strategies has produced favorable outcomes by diminishing the compliance gap,
increasing verification efficiency, and minimizing compliance costs.
Given the complexities of the prevailing tax system and the government’s limited
capacity to implement enforcement mechanisms and comprehensively monitor taxpayer
behavior, these factors have provided a backdrop for non-compliance issues occasioned
by high rates of tax avoidance by individual payers and corporations. However, existing
research has failed to provide conclusive answers on specific factors that affect tax
morality and incentivize tax evasion (Finley, 2019). An experimental study by Trivedi and
Mawani (2020) has investigated how corruption practices in tax auditing impact
compliance among individuals and businesses. Primary findings from these experiments
suggest that corrupt practices involving tax institutions may mediate non-compliance
issues by facilitating evasive behaviors, where these authorities discard their gatekeeping
roles, providing an avenue for tax cheating (Trivedi & Mawani, 2020). To add to these
findings, a quantitative inquiry conducted by Angeles (2022) to examine tax compliance
practices indicated a high risk of tax evasion due to factors such as a lack of ethical
governance practices in organizations, unfavorable tax feeling experience, and the
30
absence of non-economic motivators, leading to low morale, reduced engagement, and
negative attitudes toward honest cooperation and participation in fulfilling tax
obligations. Li (2022) presented consistent findings, explaining how dissatisfaction
among organizational staff in corporate tax departments reduces effectiveness in tax
planning and mediates other negative outcomes, including productivity loss and increased
avoidance risks. Therefore, effective compliance depends on the extent to which tax
authorities, individuals, and enterprises anticipate and respond to these issues to promote
positive behaviors and disincentivize avoidance.
Cost of Compliance
Numerous studies have investigated the association between tax systems’
complexity and compliance costs. Musimenta (2020) found that tax compliance is a
significant issue that requires deliberate acts and focused efforts to address possible
determinants that increase the risk of tax non-compliance. An assessment of baseline tax
liability in the context of developing countries by Musimenta described knowledge
requirements, for example, human resources needed to understand and make sense of
various tax laws and challenges confronted while dealing with the complexities of the tax
system as the primary drivers of internal compliance costs. Further, a review by
Vishnuhadevi (2021) has explored various costs to develop insights into the compliance
burden associated with a specific tax. For example, the study infers from existing
literature to establish a link between VAT compliance and operating costs, such as the
burden of making compliance decisions, administrative costs accrued by businesses in
such processes, and psychological costs experienced by individual taxpayers
(Vishnuhadevi, 2021). Therefore, governments must identify specific components of
31
various taxes and take proactive steps to minimize the costs associated with compliance
decisions in diverse taxpayers’ situations.
Businesses spend a sizeable share of their financial resources on hiring tax experts
and seeking other external services, which adds to the compliance burden incurred by
these entities. In most cases, strained relationships between taxpayers – individuals or
enterprises – and tax authorities at various jurisdictional levels may intensify
psychological costs, leading to a more significant compliance burden (Vishnuhadevi,
2021). In the case of sales tax, especially while implementing strategies for interstate tax
compliance, responsible agencies must provide individual payers and enterprises, such as
SMEs, with educational resources, ongoing communications, and technological
assistance to increase their capacity in handling compliance challenges (Cardillo et al.,
2021). However, providing such assistance and tax support results in high administrative
costs, given that the compliance agencies and business entities in question have to incur a
substantial burden – a prerequisite to attain compliance objectives. Critically, compliance
costs may be inflated by the expenses incurred in knowledge development through tax
education programs and other human resource investments to reduce reliance on external
assistance and ease the psychological burden associated with compliance.
Consequences and Benefits of Tax Compliance
Tax income, including revenue collected by federal and regional tax authorities,
provides a good starting point for governments to visualize economic growth and meet
their capital expenditures. Fahriyah et al. (2022) stressed the need to encourage
compliance with established laws and optimal tax collection by mandated authorities.
32
Compliance encompasses a critical component of the most successful tax systems.
Effective tax administration and policy enforcement at various jurisdictional levels are
central to ensuring that national and regional governments attain their revenue targets,
increasing their fiscal capacity to meet economic development needs, address public
welfare issues, and offset capital expenditures (Belnap et al., 2023).
On the contrary, compliance issues attributed to underreporting and lack of
honesty by individuals and enterprises while reporting income and other liabilities may
constrain public resources and contribute to tax gaps, as aggregate revenues collected and
reported by tax authorities are only a fraction of what it would get if everyone remained
compliant (Adhikari et al., 2021). A different review by Maulidi (2020) has offered a
criminological perspective on tax compliance and provided critical insights into the legal
parameters and ramifications of non-compliance. Maulidi (2020) argues that involvement
in fraudulent behaviors, such as inaccurate tax reporting, presenting forged audit reports,
and general non-compliance, exposes individual offenders and other actors involved in
such schemes to significant legal liabilities, which may come at a considerable cost. The
research draws upon evidence from bureaucratic scandals that have prompted expensive
lawsuits and subjected elite executives from reputable organizations to hefty fines for
engaging in corrupt tax practices or conspiring with tax authorities to evade compliance.
Transition
This section included a thorough literature review of my topic. I explored
literature on business and tax compliance in depth and discussed the conceptual
framework and two alternatives. In Section 3, I review project results. Section 3 includes
my responsibilities as the researcher, participant sampling, research method and design. I
33
also address data collection tools, techniques, organization, analysis, and reliability,
validity, and effectiveness of data.
34
Section 3: Research Project Methodology
This section includes an examination of the project. I address my role as the
researcher, participants, sample populations, research methods, and the research design. I
address data collection tools, techniques, organization, analysis, and reliability and
effectiveness of data.
Project Ethics
The role of the researcher in qualitative research involves collecting data,
establishing research problems, networking, collaborating, and managing processes.
McGrath et al. (2018) stated the primary responsibility of a qualitative researcher is to
provide a thorough understanding of a specific issue and pose insightful inquiries.
Qualitative research involves accessing thoughts and feelings of participants. My
professional background in accounting includes over 10 years of experience working in
nonprofits, government, and private sectors. I started a successful accounting firm in
2019 and work closely with some small business owners. I help business owners with
accounting and tax preparation. As the researcher, I chose to work with business owners
who were not my clients. This reduced biases I may have.
The Belmont Report guided my research. This foundational document establishes
ethical principles for researchers working with human subjects, emphasizing the
importance of beneficence and justice. Respecting individuals involves recognizing
participants as autonomous agents (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
1979). Beneficence entails ethical treatment by honoring participants’ choices,
safeguarding them from harm, and promoting their welfare (Kamp et al., 2019; U.S.
35
Department of Health and Human Services, 1979). Justice refers to moral obligations
regarding participant selection procedures (Kamp et al., 2019). Adhering to the Belmont
Report protocol is crucial in research in order to uphold data integrity and prioritize
participants’ rights and privacy.
Researchers should adhere to ethical standards by addressing significant issues
that can undermine the integrity of research. As a student, I reviewed the DBA Qualitative
Pragmatic Inquiry Manual. My understanding of the manual enabled me to conduct
ethical research. The school’s IRB reviewed and approved the study per ethical standards
and regulatory requirements. I received an approval number (08-09-241132114). I strictly
adhered to my project’s IRB guidelines. Participants were provided with informed
consent forms to ensure they had sufficient information to make independent and
informed decisions about participation. This promotes respect for individual autonomy
and protects rights and wellbeing of participants (Lindsay et al, 2019). Participation in the
study was voluntary, and participants could withdraw at any time without facing any
penalties. To ensure confidentiality, identities of all participants were masked with unique
identifiers. Per IRB procedures, I will securely retain all collected data for 5 years to
safeguard participant confidentiality.
Nature of the Project
Three primary research methods are qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
(Yin, 2018). Quantitative researchers focus on regulations and rules in certain
circumstances, make hypotheses, separate and control variables, and use statistical tools
to examine the importance of variable relationships or group differences (House, 2018).
36
Qualitative methods are relevant when researchers explore phenomena from participants’
point of view (Yin, 2018). Mixed methods researchers combine qualitative and
quantitative research techniques, methods, approaches, concepts, and language into a
single study (Yin, 2018). In my study, I explored business owners’ experiences using a
semi-structured interview process. l used the qualitative method to address my research
question. This method was appropriate for my study because I explored a phenomenon
from participants’ perspectives. I examined small business owners’ strategies to comply
with federal, state, and local tax requirements.
Qualitative research designs include phenomenology, ethnicity, and pragmatic
inquiry (House, 2018; Yin, 2018). The phenomenological design is suitable when
researchers want to explore participants’ experiences regarding a particular phenomenon
(Adams & van Manen, 2017). Ethnographic researchers try to understand participants’
behaviors by inserting themselves into cultural and social environments (Watson,2018).
The most appropriate research design for this study was the pragmatic inquiry. House
(2018) described pragmatic inquiries as an introspective approach that involves eliciting
data from semi-structured interviews. I interacted directly with business owners, giving
me a deeper understanding of phenomenon. This enabled me to identify and holistically
understand the phenomenon through interviews, observations, and field notes.
Population, Sampling, and Participants
The target population for this study was seven small business owners with at least
five 5 of experience with federal, state, and local business tax compliance; five
participants were business owners, and two were tax accountants who were business
owners. I employed purposeful sampling techniques in this study. Lefèvre et al. (2019)
37
defined purposeful sampling as deliberate selection of participants who are experts in
their field and can provide detailed descriptions of their experiences. I used a deliberate
sampling strategy with specific inclusion criteria to choose participants for this study.
This approach enabled me to target small business owners who diligently complied with
federal, state, and local taxes for at least 5 years. I used the snowball method to identify
participants through social media platforms such as Facebook and asking participants if
they could recommend any other qualified business owners they knew.
Furthermore, I selected participants who aligned with the project's overarching
purpose. According to Mweshi and Sakyi (2020), researchers should identify potential
participants who are most accessible to them and provide them with the necessary
information. To establish trust early in the research process, I initiated contact with the
selected participants, by phone call or email explaining the study's purpose and allowing
them to decide whether they wished to participate freely. Subsequently, I followed up
with an email containing additional information and a request for written consent. I
ensured that participants were treated with respect, dignity, and privacy throughout the
research process. Additionally, I continued to collect data until data saturation was
reached. As Saunders et al. (2018) described, an interviewer has reached data saturation
when they keep hearing similar responses. Saunders et al. (2018) described that
interviewers reach data saturation after hearing similar responses.
Data Collection Activities
I was the primary tool that collected and analyzed the data for this pragmatic
inquiry using a semistructured interview to elicit successful tax strategies that business
owners use to comply with federal, state, and local taxes. Semistructured interviews are
38
the most effective method for researchers to gather pertinent data on participants'
experiences and delve deeper into their responses for clarification or elaboration (Yin,
2018). To ensure methodological rigor and adherence to ethical standards, I developed
and adhered to an interview protocol (see Appendix A) to guide the study process.
According to Candela (2019), adherence to interview protocols enables researchers to
streamline qualitative data collection, ensuring a well-defined and efficient process that
enhances the reliability and validity of the findings. The semi-structured interviews for
this study included predetermined open-ended questions that explored the strategies
business owners use to comply with Federal, state, and local taxes. I followed an
interview protocol (see Appendix A) by asking questions and ensuring the participants'
comfort. During the interview, I also observed the participant's body language and asked
probing questions based on my observation. Lastly, I utilized additional publicly available
data to provide comprehensive support for the interviews. By doing so, I was able to offer
a more detailed insight, verify facts, and provide a well-rounded perspective on the topics
discussed during the interviews.
Interview Questions
1. What strategies do you use to comply with federal, state, and local
taxes?
2. How did you implement the strategies?
3. What challenges do you face while implementing the strategies?
4. How do you overcome the challenges to implement the strategies?
5. How do you measure the effectiveness of the tax strategies
implemented
39
6. What alternative strategies have you considered or tried, and why
did you dismiss them
7. What other information can you share about your strategies to
comply with
Federal, state, and local tax compliance?
Data Organization and Analysis Techniques
The organization data allows the researcher to reference and review easily.
Goldsmith (2021) emphasized that researchers should organize data meticulously to
uphold research quality and generate coherent, meaningful information while adhering to
ethical guidelines. According to Goldsmith (2021), the objective of data organization is to
establish a clear connection between the data and the summary findings. I used an Otter
to record both in-person and Zoom interviews. Recording and transcribing the interview
further enhance accurate data and analysis. I organized the data collected, transcribed the
interviews, and loaded the transcripts into a Microsoft Word file on a password-protected
personal computer. To maintain the confidentiality of all participants, I used coded names
to identify participants. I stored all data in a passworded personal computer I will
securely retain the data for five years to safeguard the rights of participants. Data will be
destroyed after five years to maintain the participant confidentiality and protect their
privacy.
Qualitative researchers are responsible for conducting a thorough data analysis to
present valid and reliable findings, enhancing the study's trustworthiness. To accomplish
this, I followed the Braun and Clarke (2006) six-step thematic analysis guide while using
Microsoft Word for data organization and analysis, as Alam (2021). During the analysis
40
process, I examined relevant documents, including interview notes, transcripts, and
recordings to identify patterns, subjects, and explanations. This comprehensive approach
enabled me to gain insights into the participants' experiences and perspectives.
Data analysis requires coding the collected data into meaningful units (Goldsmith,
2021). Coding aims to systematically organize, label, and examine narrative segments to
uncover underlying themes and patterns. This process helped to make sense of the data by
identifying commonalities, differences, and areas of overlap or redundancy. The
conceptual framework of the theory of planned behavior framed my data analysis. It
allowed me to focus on small business owner behavior concerning federal, state, and
local tax compliance strategies.
Reliability and Validity
Reliability
Reliability is a cornerstone of qualitative research studies, ensuring that findings
are not merely a result of chance but reflect consistent patterns or relationships. Johnson
et al. (2020) defined reliability as the dependability of results. Nha(2021) further
elaborated that reliability encompasses the soundness of the research methodology,
design, sampling techniques, and data analysis methods. Dependability is a crucial aspect
of reliability, referring to how a study's procedures, methods, and findings can be
replicated or repeated under similar conditions (Stenfors et al., 2020). Achieving
dependability means that another researcher could conduct the same study and obtain
comparable results, thereby enhancing the trustworthiness and credibility of the findings.
To ensure reliability and dependability in my study, I employed member checking,
a technique grounded in evidence-based practices, to enhance the credibility and
41
trustworthiness of interview findings (Candela, 2019). By allowing participants to review
my summary of the interviews, I allow them to identify any errors and confirm the
accuracy of my data interpretation. Member checking is a valuable step in the research
process, as it validates the accuracy of the findings and enhances participant engagement
and ownership of the research outcomes. Through a collaborative approach, I aimed to
strengthen the dependability of the study's findings and uphold the credibility of the
research by using member checking to achieve reliability and dependability. Member
checking is when researchers use evidence-based techniques to enhance the reliability
and credibility of the interview findings, improving the trustworthiness of the findings
(Candela,2019). To enhance the dependability of this study's findings, I allowed the
participants to review a summary of the interviews to check for errors and to confirm my
data interpretation.
Validity
Validity is paramount in qualitative research, ensuring the consistency and
dependability of research outcomes (Johnson et al., 2020). Researchers should
continually strive to maintain validity throughout the research process. Yin (2018)
emphasizes that qualitative researchers should capture the understanding of a
phenomenon by collecting credible details, ensuring data accuracy, using triangulation,
and performing member checking. According to Noble and Heale (2019), triangulation is
a method used to verify and establish validity by examining the research question from
various perspectives.
There are four primary types of triangulation, including methodological,
investigator, theoretical, and data source (Renz et al., 2018). Methodological triangulation
42
involves using multiple methods to study a single phenomenon, while investigator
triangulation employs multiple researchers to examine the data independently (Renz et
al., 2018). Theoretical triangulation utilizes different theoretical perspectives to interpret
the data, and data source triangulation uses various data sources to corroborate findings
(Renz et al., 2018).
In this study, I employed data source triangulation by integrating additional data
sources, such as field notes, document analysis, and participant observations, to support
the validity of the interview data. This approach enabled a comprehensive understanding
of the research question and ensured the findings were robust and credible. Enhancing
validity in qualitative research involves addressing credibility, transferability, and
confirmability, ensuring that the findings are trustworthy, meaningful, and relevant to
both participants and the scholarly community (Stenfors et al., 2020).
Credibility means that data has been interpreted correctly. The credibility
component is a critical consideration to ensure that the responses provided by participants
are captured and accurately represented (Cloutier& Ravasi, 2020). I ensured that
participants reviewed the interview summary to verify the accuracy of the information
presented in the research findings and to validate the interview data and my
understanding.
I enhanced the transferability of my study by purposefully selecting diverse and
representative participants to be interviewed, ensuring that the study results could be
applied beyond the boundaries of its initial population (Maxwell, 2021). Additionally, I
provided research content that is helpful to any future researcher, enabling others to add
more knowledge and value to the research topic.
43
Confirmability refers to the extent to which other researchers can replicate the
findings. Confirmability demonstrates that the study data and analysis reflect the
participant's perceptions and views, and the researcher's bias did not influence the
findings (Dyar,2022). Confirmability will be established through methodical
documentation, leaving an audit trail, and providing a reference to follow throughout the
study process (Dyar,2022). I established confirmability by verifying the integrity and
interpretation of the collected data through member checking. Conformability relies on
data saturation, which occurs when data collection and analysis yield no new information
to address the research question (Saunders et al.,2018)
Transition and Summary
In Section 3, I examined the project. I explained my role as the researcher,
participants, sample populations, research methods, and design. I also addressed data
collection tools, techniques, organization, analysis, and reliability and effectiveness of
data. In Section 4, I present findings from my research.
Section 4: Findings and Conclusions
In this qualitative pragmatic inquiry study, I aimed to explore and identify
strategies business owners used to comply with federal, state, and local taxes. Participants
were seven business owners who have been in business for at least 5 years and complied
with federal, state, and local taxes. Participants were chosen based on number of years in
business and business tax compliance, thus ensuring alignment with the research
problem. I used an interview protocol and interviewed business owners using seven
interview questions. Data collection began with Zoom interviews with six participants
and one face-to-face interview. I recorded each interview using Otter which automatically
44
transcribed data. Using thematic analysis, I examined interview responses. I used
Microsoft Word to organize and identify themes. Based on data, I identified three major
themes. Results of this study include strategies that business owners use to comply with
federal state and local taxes. I used P1P7pseudonyms to hide identities of participants.
Presentation of the Findings
I identified three themes resulting from my comprehensive data analysis:
professional assistance, automated systems, and education and IRS guidance. According
to Baber et al. (2020), researchers identify recurrent keywords during interviews and
analyze data to identify themes. I identified themes after analyzing keywords during
interviews (see Table 1).
Table 1
Summary of Themes, Participants, and Experts from Transcripts
Theme
Description
Participants
Sample Experts
from Participants
Professional
Assistance
CPA, Accountant,
CFO, Book-keeper,
HR for Payroll
taxes
P1,P4,P5, P6 & P7
“We outsource our
books to
bookkeepers and
the taxes are done
by CPA”( P1), “ We
got a Fractional
CFO for day one”
(P7), “We had CFO,
Accountant, and
CPA making sure
we were doing
things right by the
books”( P5)
45
Automated systems
Quickbooks, Waves,
Tax software, POS
systems
P1, P2, P3, & P6
“ I use QuickBooks
software to keep
my books. My bank
is connected to
QuickBooks” (P3),
“We use Wave for
our invoicing” (P1),
“I file my sales tax
myself. I pull all
our sales data from
the POS” ( P6).
Education & IRS
Guidance
Small business
administration
training, IRS
seminars &
consulting the IRS
for compliance
support.
P1,P2 P3 & P5
“I keep abreast on
the IRS tax
updates”(P03), “We
overcame that
challenge by
discussing with the
IRS” P4
Theme 1: Professional Assistance
The theme of professional assistance was most popular in interviews. Six participants
emphasized they needed professional help to comply with federal, state, and local taxes.
Participants included certified public accountants (CPAs), chief financial officers
(CFOs), and bookkeepers. P1, P4, P5, and P6 used CPAs to be tax compliant, while P7
used a fractional CFO to comply with federal, state, and local taxes. P1 stated they
outsourced their books to bookkeepers outside of the United States and then outsourced
audit and business tax preparation to CPAs in the United States. P1 mentioned their
business taxes were complicated; they were incorporated in one state, did business in
another, and lived in another. P1 stated, “It is a challenge to keep up with fulfilling the
responsibilities for each state.”
46
P4 and P6 also used CPAs. P4 had no knowledge about financial aspects of the
business, particularly the tax code, as well as what to do to make the business compliant.
P4 stated, “I had difficulty understanding some tax codes and requirements. The CPA was
there to guide me along the way.” P6 affirmed that from the beginning of the business,
they had a CPA who did their taxes and kept them compliant. According to P6, the CPA
“ensured that we had a working structure for our accounting books from day one of the
business. The books are the bases for the information needed for business tax
preparation.” P5 outsourced tax preparation to CPAs. They, however, had an accountant
who ensured books were up-to-date. P5 highlighted in his 19 years of business, he was
not audited once. P5 attributed this to having accountants and CPAs who helped with
books and tax preparation.
P7 mentioned he used a CFO from the inception of his business. Fractional CFOs
work on books and file business taxes. P7 mentioned if a business desires to scale, it
needs to have a CFO who ensures tax compliance and helps maintain financial integrity
of the business. P7’s business scaled since 2019 and increased the number of employees
in the accounting department to include accounts payable and receivable.
Findings from literature confirmed the importance of accountants in small
businesses. According to Shaikh (2023), accounting plays a vital role in businesses, with
managerial and financial accounting practices being the foundation for making sound
decisions. Perry et al. (2020) mentioned accountants are the most critical advisors for
business owners. This suggests roles of accountant, CPAs, and CFOs must be considered.
According to Winczorek (2023), business owners describe tax authorities as burdensome
and often offend common sense. Weigel and Hiebl (2022) stated accountants provide
47
small businesses with nonbusiness and business advice, including tax-related advice.
Accountants collect financial documents from clients and enter them into the accounting
system, managing balance sheets and tax returns (Winczorek, 2023). This allows firms to
meet expectations of tax authorities and minimize tax audits.
According to the TPB, perceived behavioral control is optimism to carry out a
behavior effectively. This perception is furthered mainly by business owners seeking
services of professional tax consultants through professional advice on effectively
handling complexities associated with keeping tax obligations in order. Participants had
confidence when relying on professionals; this supports the TPB concept that perceived
control increases compliance. Moreover, professional support further consolidates
positive attitudes toward compliance since business owners are more capable and
supported during compliance decisions, which become less complex and more
straightforward.
Theme 2: Use of Automated Systems
Using an automated system was another popular theme in the study. Participants
relied on digital tools that enabled them to lighten workloads in terms of keeping finances
in order, setting reminders for due dates, and complying with federal, state, and local tax
obligations. Automated systems in this study included QuickBooks for recording
expenses and incomes, Wave which served as a system for invoicing, POS systems for
recording all sales, and other accounting software used by businesses for record-keeping
purposes, tracking expenses, managing sales data, and facilitating timely tax filings.
P1, P2, P3, and P6 used automated systems to carefully track financial
transactions. P1 revealed that “electronics made it easy to track the business income and
48
expenses.” P1 uses two bank accounts: one to track all income and the other for all
expenses. According to P1, separating the bank for expense and the one for income makes
it easy for the bookkeeper to track expenses and income and prepare the profit and loss
statement. P2 and P3, who are accountants, mentioned using QuickBooks to record all
transactions and prepare financial statements. P3 further explained that quick books and
tax software help with reminders of tax deadlines. P6 empathized that the POS was used
for all sales in the business. Although the CPA is responsible for the books and tax
preparation, P6 is responsible for the monthly remittance of the sales tax. Using the POS
for all sales helped to make calculating the sale tax easy to compute
Recent studies have identified that automated accounting systems contribute
significantly to tax compliance regarding financial reporting accuracy, efficiency, and
transparency. Accounting systems are used for collecting, storing, processing, and
communicating financial and accounting data through financial statements to support and
guide organizational decision-making (Granyam& Ivungu,2019). Kuznetsova et al.
(2023) indicated that integrating computerized systems into accounting practices
facilitates compliance because of the coherence and accuracy in bookkeeping records,
which are minimal errors compared to manual processes. Automated systems also enable
real-time monitoring and reporting, critical in adhering to ever-evolving tax regulations
(Djafri et al., 2023). These systems will eventually help an organization maintain accurate
and up-to-date records, support compliance efforts, and reduce potential penalties due to
inaccuracies.
Besides, AI and blockchain in automated accounting systems have immensely
increased compliance to ensure information security and integrity (Demirkan et al.,
49
2020). This kind of integration in technology supports the preparation of all tax-related
activities within the seamless execution, such as filing and reporting, through automation
of complex processes like calculations and data analysis. As such, Hesami et al. (2023)
identified that the use of these in financial management systems helps ensure that not
only does compliance take place but also provides a robust structure necessary for
locating and correcting discrepancies that will help improve overall levels of compliance.
The literature confirms that automated accounting systems have arrived as a prime tool
for enhancing tax compliance, at least in today's highly digitized financial environment.
Using accounting systems like QuickBooks and POS software would relate
strongly to the TPB constructs of attitude and subjective norms. Business owners
generally view accounting systems favorably since these tools make compliance easier
and less prone to manual mistakes, allowing them to see through their finances very
clearly. The positive attitude, consequently, drives the adoption of such systems since
owners believe that such systems are reliable for making tax management less complex
and more effective. Again, subjective norms may occur, such as the perceived social
pressures to perform a behavior. The business community increasingly expects people to
use technology to manage their finances since accounting software is now considered
mainstream among peers. Business owners may be influenced by the success stories that
set examples of others using such tools with effectiveness and efficiency and, thus,
reinforce the perception that adopting such systems is the right approach to maintaining
compliance. This social validation reinforces a positive attitude towards technology and
results in the likelihood of compliance through the systems.
50
Theme 3: Education and IRS Guidance
The theme of education depicts a commitment to continuous learning. It seeks
immediate clarification from tax bodies so that business owners can keep abreast of all
federal, state, and local governments on taxes. Tax codes change frequently, so business
owners need to stay current. Education covers activities like understanding the business
structure and the tax requirement for the business structure, attending seminars conducted
by the Internal Revenue Service, being informed of any changes in tax laws, and
consultations with the representatives of the Internal Revenue Service to clarify complex
tax-related issues. By participating in continuing education and availing themselves of the
resources offered by the IRS, business owners can learn about their responsibilities, make
wiser decisions, and face a typically complicated area with much more confidence. Only
by this proactive way of learning and seeking advice will a business avoid costly mistakes
and continue to optimize its compliance strategies.
P1, P2, P3, and P5 highlighted how education is essential in their compliance
efforts. For Instance, P1 and P2 emphasized how important it is for business owners to
understand their business type and structure, as every business structure has a different
tax requirement. P1 stated, “Professional advice matters regarding business structure and
understanding the tax benefits and requirements associated with each.” P02 also said,
“Understand the business you are entering and the tax implications before you begin
operation”
Moreover, both accountants, P2 and P3, mentioned that regular attendance at IRS
seminars and other CPE classes allowed them to stay current about new tax codes. This
behavior allowed the business owner to learn about new complex regulations and adapt
51
compliance activities to accommodate those regulations. As P3 related, " I attend CPE &
professional educational classes where they take the time to break down new or existing
laws. P4, on the other hand, reported that the IRS agent had to come to the business site
to rectify an "honest misconception" of the tax code related to the employer's portion of
unemployment taxes. P4 explained, "I didn't understand why I needed to pay the
employer portion of unemployment tax to the IRS."
Direct interaction with the IRS put P4 in a better position to know his legal
requirements and thus comply with them. The shared experiences indicate that guidance
from the IRS brings clarity and practical solutions to prevent noncompliance and
financial penalties. The participants' shared experiences demonstrate that business owners
recognize education and consultations with the IRS as helpful tools in maintaining
compliance and the long-term viability of the business.
Recent literature indicates that education and guidance by the IRS are cardinal to
business compliance since such regulations provide an enabling environment with an
understanding of tax regulations and a supportive compliance environment. Tax education
programs initiated by the various tax authorities, such as the IRS, go a long way in
putting the taxpayer in a better position regarding their duties, which, in turn, would
increase compliance levels. This research highlights how education programs demystify
the laws on taxation and bring compliance to real life for any business owner. According
to Hassan et al. (2023), the facilitating approach, such as education and guidance
provided by the IRS, influences the behaviors of the taxpayers in motivating compliance
due to having more knowledge and less fear of such complicated matters.
52
The most crucial element of successful compliance is direct interaction by the
IRS, particularly education support through personal advice (Alm, 2023). Timely advice
and explanations by the tax authorities help the taxpayers to comply more precisely with
the respective laws. It avoids all kinds of non-compliance, intentional or unintentional. It
strengthens the taxpayer's relation to the IRS, which brings more compliance. Proactive
education and guidance through tax administrations are some of the most decisive ways
to ensure a compliance culture, particularly for SMEs with fragile internal resources.
Attitudes towards education and guidance by the IRS are critical in compliance as
they determine the willingness of the business owners to seek or make use of these
resources. Most business owners develop positive attitudes towards engaging in
IRSprovided education and guidance since such serves to simplify complex tax laws,
reduce fear of non-compliance, and, at the same time, empower them with actionable
knowledge. This kind of positive attitude has them attending seminars, inquiring about
updates, and consulting with IRS officials without feeling that all these activities are
distressing duties but rather lifetime opportunities.
Business Contributions and Recommendations For Professional Practice
This qualitative pragmatic inquiry study aimed to explore and identify business
owners' strategies to comply with federal, state, and local taxes. The findings of this study
are relevant to small business owners who intend to be tax-compliant. Businesses must be
tax-compliant to avoid heavy fines, penalties, or even a shutdown. An analysis of the
interviews with the participants in this study showed three significant themes. The
literature also supports the three themes: professional assistance, using automated
systems, education, and IRS guidance. The participants described strategies to help
53
current and future business owners seeking effective strategies to comply with Federal,
state, and local taxes.
Findings from the study encourage small business leaders to seek professional
assistance from a CPA, accountant, CFO, or bookkeeper. Professionals can aid a small
business owner in being financially organized, tracking income and expenses, creating
reports like financial statements, saving money on taxes, strategically saving money, and
aiding with tax compliance. They can also advise business owners on business decisions
and their tax implications. Therefore, business owners should carefully select the
professionals that will be suitable and cost-effective for their businesses.
In addition, the findings from the study also encourage business owners to use
automated systems. Business owners should use automated accounting systems such as
accounting software, Inventory management software, and POS systems. Accounting
systems can used for collecting, storing, processing, and communicating financial
statements to support and guide organizational decision-making (Grayam&
Ivungu,2019). These systems will aid efficiency in automating routine tasks like tracking
invoices, receipts, Income and expenditures, and inventory management. It also helps
with POS integration and bank integrations. Integrating computerized systems into
accounting practices facilitates compliance because of the coherence and accuracy in
bookkeeping records, which are minimal errors compared to manual processes
(Kuznetsova et al., 2023). Therefore, I recommend business owners carefully select
accounting systems that work well with their industry.
Lastly, the findings of this research also encourage business owners to consult
with the IRS to clarify tax regulations and their applicability to unique circumstances. It
54
also offers guidance on necessary record-keeping, income reporting, and other compliance
matters. In addition, business owners need to understand their business structure. Varying
business structures have different tax requirements that affect crucial aspects of the
business, including tax compliance. I therefore recommend that business owners invest in
education, seek consultation with the IRS, and understand their business structure.
Implications for Social Change
Findings from this study may contribute to positive social change by adding to the
body of knowledge on some of the strategies small business owners use to comply with
federal, state, and local taxes. I researched this topic, expecting the findings to improve
the knowledge of how business owners can comply with federal, state, and local taxes.
When business owners follow tax rules, they steer clear of several problems. They can
avoid fines, penalties, and legal issues. They can also avoid damaged business reputation,
and risking a possible business shutdown. In addition, when businesses pay their taxes,
the government can accomplish its economic goals and carry out its conventional duties,
such as providing good roads and hospitals and maintaining law and order, which benefits
individuals and society.
Recommendations For Further Study
In this qualitative pragmatic study, I explored and identified business owners'
strategies to comply with federal, state, and local taxes. I used semistructured interviews
to dig deeper and understand the research question. The final population included seven
business owners who have been in business for at least five years and have complied with
federal, state, and local taxes. I recommend that future studies should increase the variety
of businesses. My focus was on the business owner or their accountant. Five of my
55
participants were business owners and two were accountants. Future research should
include more business accountants because they may have more strategies to help
business owners comply with federal, state, and local taxes.
Conclusion
Business tax compliance is essential in any business and society as a whole.
However, business tax can be complex and challenging to understand. In addition to that,
tax laws change so frequently that it is difficult for business owners to keep up. Similarly,
complying with federal, state, and local taxes can be very expensive for small business
owners. Findings from this study could help small business owners develop strategies to
comply with federal, state, and local taxes. Findings from this study show that complying
with federal, state, and local taxes depends on strategies such as professional assistance,
automated accounting systems, and education/ IRS guidance.
56
References
Abdu, E., & Adem, M. (2023). Tax compliance behavior of taxpayers in Ethiopia: A
review paper. Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(1), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2189559
Abramovaite, J., Bandyopadhyay, S., Bhattacharya, S., & Cowen, N. (2023). Classical
deterrence theory revisited: An empirical analysis of police force areas in England
and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 20(5), 1663–1680.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211072415.
Abu Hassan, N. S., Palil, M. R., Ramli, R., & Maelah, R. (2023). Increasing tax
compliance behaviour through accommodative approaches and tax rewards.
International Journal of Economics and Management, 17(2), 211–228.
https://doi.org/10.47836/ijeam.17.2.05
Adams, C., & van Manen, M. A. (2017). Teaching phenomenological research and
writing. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 780–791.
Adhikari, B., Alm, J., & Harris, T. F. (2021). Small business tax compliance under
thirdparty reporting. Journal of Public Economics, 203, 104514.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104514
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-
5978(91)90020-t
Albab, F. N. U., Ramadhani, R., & Komariyah, E. F. (2020). The effect of local taxes,
local retribution, and capital expenditures on local own-source
revenue. International Journal of Business, Humanities, Education and Social
57
Sciences, 2(2), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.46923/ijbhes.v2i2.93
Albab, F. N. U., & Suwardi, E. (2021). The effect of tax knowledge on voluntary tax
compliance with trust as a mediating variable: A study on micro, small, and
medium enterprises (MSMEs). Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research,
24(3), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.528
Alm, J. (2022). Devising administrative policies for improving tax compliance. Canadian
Tax Journal, 70(Supp), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2022.70.supp.alm
Al-Rashdan, M. A., &Al-Zaqeba, M. A. (2020). The effect of attitude, subjective norms,
perceived behavioral control on tax compliance in Jordan: The moderating effect
of customs tax. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(4),
233–238. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/apr2020/The-Effect-Of-Attitude-
Subjective-Norms-Perceived-Behavioral-Control-On-Tax-Compliance-In-Jordan-
The-Moderating-Effect-Of-Costums-Tax.pdf
Alshira'h, A. (2023). How can value-added tax compliance be incentivized? An
experimental examination of trust in government and tax compliance costs.
Journal of Money Laundering Control, 27(1), 191–208.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2023-0009
Angeles, I. T. (2022). Categorizing taxpayers: A mixed-method study on small business
tax compliance in the Philippines. South East Asian Journal of
Management, 15(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.21002/seam.v15i2.13295
Awang, N., Hussin, N. S., Razali, F. A., & Talib, S. L. A. (2021). Fraud triangle theory:
Calling for new factors. Insight Journal, 7, 54–64.
https://doi.org/10.24191/ij.v7i0.87
58
Bani-Khalid, T., Alshira’h, A. F., & Alshirah, M. H. (2022). Determinants of tax
compliance intention among Jordanian SMEs: A focus on the theory of planned
behavior. Economies, 10(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10020030.
Bankman, J., Shaviro, D. N., Stark, K. J., & Scharff, E. A. (2023). Federal income
taxation. Aspen Publishing.
Bastani, S., Blomquist, S., & Micheletto, L. (2019). Nonlinear and piecewise linear
income taxation and the subsidization of work-related goods. International Tax
and Public Finance, 26, 806–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-019-09532-1
Bazzoli, M., Di Caro, P., Figari, F., Fiorio, C. V., & Manzo, M. (2020). Size, heterogeneity
and distributional effects of self-employment income tax evasion in
Italy (No. EM 18/20). EUROMOD Working Paper.
https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/259507
Bellon, M., Dabla-Norris, E., Khalid, S., & Lima, F. (2022). Digitalization to improve tax
compliance: Evidence from VAT e-invoicing in Peru. Journal of Public
Economics, 210, 104661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104661
Bellová, J., & Špírková, T. (2021). The theory of planned behavior as a research tool an
connection with tax law and economics. Financial Law Review, 21(1), 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.21.001.13284
Belnap, A., Welsch, A., & Williams, B. (2023). Remote tax authority. Journal of
Accounting and Economics, 75(2-3), 101570.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101570
Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850
59
Blank, J. D., & Osofsky, L. (2020). Legal calculators and the tax system. The Ohio State
Technology Law Journal, 16, 73–90.
https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/91837/OSTLJ_V16N1_073.pdf?sequenc
e=1
Boesen, U. (2021). Excise tax applications and trends. Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact,
(753), 1–39. https://files.taxfoundation.org/20210315131902/Excise-Tax-
Application-and-Trends.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brennan, P., & Rosacker, K. (2020). The TCJA’s reductions of tax accounting compliance
burdens for small business taxpayers. Journal of Accounting and
Finance, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v20i2.2816
Brownstein, M., Madva, A., & Gawronski, B. (2020). Understanding implicit bias:
Putting the criticism into perspective. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 101(2),
276–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12302.
Candela, A. (2019). Exploring the function of member checking. The Qualitative Report,
24(3), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3726
Cardillo, A., Holt, A., & Schlaufman, S. (2021). Sales and use taxes: Investigating the
administrative and compliance costs for US small businesses. Small Business
Institute Journal, 17(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.28148
Carrillo, P. E., Castro, E., & Scartascini, C. (2021). Public good provision and property
tax compliance: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Public
60
Economics, 198(1), 1–19. 104422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104422.
Cloutier, C., & Ravasi, D. (2020). Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative
research. Strategic Organization, 19(1). 113–133.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020979329
Cressey, D. R. (1952). Application and verification of the differential association theory.
The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 43(1), 43–52.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1138991
Demirkan, S., Demirkan, I., & McKee, A. (2020). Blockchain technology in the future of
Business Cyber Security and Accounting. Journal of Management Analytics, 7(2),
189–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1731721
Djafri, I. A., Damawati, I., Suharto, S., Satwika, I. G., & Rahmatullah, R. (2023).
Utilization of Information and Communication Technology in the tax
administration system to increase taxpayer compliance. Ilomata International
Journal of Tax and Accounting, 4(1), 14–25.
https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v4i1.670
Dörrenberg, P., Pfrang, A., & Schmitz, J. (2022). How to improve payroll tax compliance
of small firms? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Evidence from a
Randomized Field Experiment (June 7, 2022).
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4130097
Dularif, M., & Rustiarini, N. W. (2022). Tax compliance and non-deterrence approach: a
systematic review. International Journal of Sociology and Social
Policy, 42(11/12), 1080–1108. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-04-2021-0108
Dyar, K. L. (2022). Qualitative inquiry in nursing: Creating rigor. Nursing Forum, 57(1),
61
187–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12661
Eisenhauer, J. G. (2022). Price elasticity, tax incidence, and sales volume: a simple
model. Journal for Economic Educators, 22(2), 29–41.
https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jfee/article/view/2290/1339
Fahriyah, A., Andayani, W., Yoseph, R., Nurwibowo, S. P., & Irawan, W. (2022).
Strategies for maintaining tax compliance of SMEs during the COVID-19
pandemic using the Supply Chain Management Integration Approach. Ilomata
International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(1), 57–67.
https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v4i1.409
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Morales, E., Suárez Serrato, J. C., & Zidar, O. (2019). State taxes and
spatial misallocation. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 333–376.
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy050
Finley, A. R. (2019). The impact of large tax settlement favorability on firms’ subsequent
tax avoidance. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(1), 156–187.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-018-9471-1
Gangodawilage, D., Madurapperuma, W., & Aluthge, C. (2022). Tax compliance behavior
of Micro-Multinational Enterprises (mMNEs). International Journal of
Innovation in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 2(1), 25–42.
https://doi.org/10.52547/ijimes.2.1.25
Gebrihet, H., Gebresilassie, Y. H., & Woldu, G. T. (2024). Trust, corruption, and tax
compliance in fragile states: On a quest for transforming Africa into future global
powerhouse. Social Sciences, 13(1), 1–21.
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010003.
62
Goldsmith, L. J. (2021). Using framework analysis in applied qualitative research. The
Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2061–2076. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-
3715/2021.5011
Granyam, A. I., & Ivungu, J. A. (2019). Effect of Accounting Information system on
financial performance of firms: A review of literature. IOSR Journal of Business
and Management (IOSR-JBM), 21(5), 39-49.
Hattke, F., & Martin, H. (2020). Collective action during the Covid-19 pandemic: The
case of Germany’s fragmented authority. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(4),
614–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1805273.
Hayashi, A. T. (2020). Dynamic property taxes and racial gentrification. Notre Dame
Law. Review, 96, 1517–1537.
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4963&context=ndlr
Hesami, S., Jenkins, H. P., & Jenkins, G. P. (2023). Emerging digital technologies to
improve tax compliance and administration efficiency: A systematic literature
review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4580004
Hoang Vu, N., Anh Bui, T., Minh Nguyen, N., & Hiep Luu, N. (2021). Local business
environment, managerial expertise, and tax corruption of small and medium-sized
enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economics, 21(2), 134–157.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099x.2021.1990473
House, J. (2018). Authentic vs elicited data and qualitative vs quantitative research
methods in pragmatics: Overcoming two non-fruitful dichotomies. System, 75, 4–
12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.014.
63
Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Misra, S. K., Rana, N. P., Raghavan, V., & Akella, V. (2019).
Blockchain research, practice, and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations,
emerging research themes and research agenda. International Journal of
Information Management, 49, 114–129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.005
Hungenberg, E., Slavich, M., Bailey, A., & Sawyer, T. (2020). Examining minor league
baseball spectator nostalgia: a neuroscience perspective. Sport Management
Review, 23(5), 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.04.001.
IRS. (2022). Federal tax compliance research: Tax gap estimates for tax years 2014–
2016. Research, Applied Analytics & Statistics.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irspdf/p1415.pdf
Jensen, A. (2022). Employment structure and the rise of the modern tax system.
American Economic Review, 112(1), 213–234.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191528
Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. W. (2020). A review of the quality Indicators of
rigor in Qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,
84(1), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120
Jones, C. R. (2019). Understanding and improving use-tax compliance: A theory of
planned behavior approach. University of South Florida.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3031&context=etd
Jones, K., & Cater, M. (2020). An investigation of principals' social and emotional
learning beliefs and attitudes. The Qualitative Report, 25(9), 3204–3223.
https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.3575.
64
Kamp, K., Herbell, K., Magginis, W. H., Berry, D., & Given, B. (2019). Facebook
recruitment and the Protection of Human Subjects. Western Journal of Nursing
Research, 41(9), 1270–1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919828108
Kane, V. E. (2020). Using lean six sigma implied assumptions. The TQM Journal, 32(6),
1561–1575. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-11-2019-0271
Kovacev, R. (2020). A taxing dilemma: robot taxes and the challenges of effective
taxation of AI, automation, and robotics in the fourth industrial revolution. The
Ohio State Technology Law Journal, 16, 182. https://doi.org/10.31979/2381-
3679.2020.090204
Krautkramer, K. A., Fan, J., & Bäckhed, F. (2021). Gut microbial metabolites as
multikingdom intermediates. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 19(2), 77–94.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0438-4.
Kuo, K.-M., Talley, P. C., & Huang, C.-H. (2020). A meta-analysis of the deterrence
theory in security-compliant and security-risk behaviors. Computers & Security,
96(9), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101928
Kuznetsova, L. N., Koroleva, N. Y., Porollo, E. V., Verzhbitskaya, I. V., & Zoricheva, S.
S. (2023). Increasing the transparency of tax administration and accounting and
analytical system of management based on AI and IT technologies in support of
unshadowing of business. In Approaches to global sustainability, markets, and
governance (pp. 223–233). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2198-0_24
Lee, C. H., & Chen, C. W. (2021). Impulse buying behaviors in live streaming commerce
based on the stimulus-organism-response framework. Information, 12(6), 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.3390/info12060241
65
Lefèvre, H., Moro, M., & Lachal, J. (2019). Research in adolescent healthcare: The value
of qualitative methods. Archives De Pédiatrie, 26(7), 426–430.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2019.09.012
Lestary, S. R., Sueb, M., & Yudianto, I. (2021). The effect of tax fairness, tax
socialization, and tax understanding on tax compliance: a study on micro, small
and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business,
4(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.24198/jaab.v4i1.31998
Li, J. (2022). The effect of employee satisfaction on effective corporate tax planning:
Evidence from Glassdoor. Advances in Accounting, 57, 100597.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2022.100597
Lindsay, E. K., Young, S., Brown, K. W., Smyth, J. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2019).
Mindfulness training reduces loneliness and increases social contact in a
randomized controlled trial. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
the United States of America, 116(9), 3488–3493.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813588116
Maulidi, A. (2020). When and why (honest) people commit fraudulent behaviours?
Journal of Financial Crime, 27(2), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-05-2019-
0058
Maxwell, J. A. (2021). Why qualitative methods are necessary for generalization.
Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000173
McGrath, C., Palmgren, P. J., & Liljedahl, M. (2018). Twelve tips for conducting
qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 1002–1006.
66
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2018.1497149
Musimenta, D. (2020). Knowledge requirements, tax complexity, compliance costs, and
tax compliance in Uganda. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1812220.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1812220
Mweshi, G. K., & Sakyi, K. A. (2020). Application of sampling methods for the research
design. Archives of Business Research, 8(11), 180–193.
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.811.9042
Nha, V. T. T. (2021). Understanding validity and reliability from qualitative and
quantitative research traditions. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(3), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4672
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based
Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145
Palupi, W. S., & Putri, N. K. (2021). Tax Compliance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A
Literature Review. Fokus Bisnis: Media Pengkaijan Manajemen Dan Akuntansi,
20(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.32639/fokusbisnis.v19i2.921
Perry, J., Badger, B., Lean, J., & Leybourne, S. (2010). Taking over the reins: The needs
of individuals who purchase small established enterprises. The International
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 11(1), 57–67.
https://doi.org/10.5367/000000010790772485
Renz, S. M., Carrington, J. M., & Badger, T. A. (2018). Two strategies for qualitative
content analysis: An intra-method approach to triangulation. Qualitative Health
Research, 28(5), 824–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317753586
67
Sánchez-Aguayo, M., Urquiza-Aguiar, L., & Estrada-Jiménez, J. (2021). Fraud detection
using the fraud triangle theory and data mining techniques: A literature review.
Computers, 10(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10100121.
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H.,
& Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its
conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and Quantity, 52(4), 1893–
1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Shaikh, J. M. (2023). “Considering the ethics of accounting in managing business
accounts: A review”. TESS Res Econ Bus, 2(1), 115.
Siglé, M. A., Goslinga, S., Spekle, R. F., & van der Hel, L. E. (2022). The cooperative
approach to corporate tax compliance: An empirical assessment. Journal of
International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 46, 100447.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2022.100447
Slattery, C., & Zidar, O. (2020). Evaluating state and local business incentives. Journal of
Economic Perspectives, 34(2), 90–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.2.90
Smirnova, E., Okhrimenko, I., & Zakharova, A. (2022). Review of best practices in
selfemployment taxation. Public Organization Review, 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00604-1
Stenfors, T., Kajamaa, A., & Bennett, D. (2020). How to assess the quality of qualitative
research. ˜The Clinical Teacher (Print), 17(6), 596–599.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242
Pritchard, I. A. (2021). Framework for the ethical conduct of research: The ethical
principles of the Belmont Report. Handbook of Research Ethics in Psychological
68
Science., 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000258-001
Taguchi, N. (2018). Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative,
qualitative, and mixed methods research. System, 75, 23–32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.010
Taing, H. B., & Chang, Y. (2020). Determinants of tax compliance intention: focus on the
theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(1),
62–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1728313.
Tang, J., & Feng, J. (2021). Collecting system and payroll tax compliance: Evidence from
Chinese firm-level data. China Economic Quarterly International, 1(2), 135–147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2021.04.001
Taubinsky, D., & Rees-Jones, A. (2018). Attention variation and welfare: theory and
evidence from a tax salience experiment. The Review of Economic Studies, 85(4),
2462–2496. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26543970
Tilahun, M. (2019). Determinants of tax compliance: A systematic review. Economics,
8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20190801.11
Trivedi, V. U., & Mawani, A. (2020). Impact of tax advisers and corrupt tax auditors on
taxpayer compliance. Canadian Tax Journal, 68, 801–832.
https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2020.68.3.trivedi
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical
principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont
Vishnuhadevi, S. (2021). Administrative and compliance costs of value added tax (VAT):
A review. Review of Development and Change, 26(2), 179–206.
69
https://doi.org/10.1177/09722661211058807
Watson, T. (2018). Ethnography and the management of organizations. In: Ciesielska M.,
Jemielniak D. (eds) Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies. Palgrave
Macmillan, C. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65217-7_6
Weigel, C., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2022). Accountants and small businesses: Toward a
resource-based view. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change,
19(5), 642–666. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-03-2022-0044
Winczorek, J. (2023). Valets, Butlers, housekeepers. lawyers and accountants as service
providers in the market of legal services for smes in Poland. International Journal
of the Legal Profession, 30(1), 81–113.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2023.2168674
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review.
Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yanikkaya, H., & Turan, T. (2020). Tax structure and economic growth: Do differences in
income level and government effectiveness matter? The Singapore Economic
Review, 65(01), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590818500170
Ya’u, A., Miraz, M. H., Saad, N., Bala, H., Rangasamy, D., Olaniyi, O. N., & Mustapha,
U. A. (2023). Effects of economic deterrence theory and environmental regulation
on tax evasion: Evidence from energy sector. International Journal of Energy
Economics and Policy, 13(5), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14736
Yazbeck, A. S., Savedoff, W. D., Hsiao, W. C., Kutzin, J., Soucat, A., Tandon, A., & Chi-
Man Yip, W. (2020). The case against labor-tax-financed social health insurance
70
for Low-And Low-Middle-Income Countries: A summary of recent research into
labor-tax financing of social health insurance in low- and lowmiddle-income
countries. Health Affairs, 39(5), 892–897.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00874
Students also viewed