DUE WITHIN 24HRS

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Content Weight: 30%

0 points

The topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand, does not address many assignment requirements. The information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic.

21 points

The topic is mostly covered and appropriate to the assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate an accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given.

24 points

The topic is covered entirely and appropriate to the assignment; overview of crucial concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail.

30 points

In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in the information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details.

/ 30

Organization Weight: 25%

0 points

The organization is confusing and interferes with the reader's ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of the topic or is missing or irrelevant.

17.5 points

Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. The conclusion contains a basic summary of the topic without final concluding ideas, which may inappropriately introduce new information.

20 points

Structure ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. The conclusion contains a good summary of the topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.

25 points

Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting the smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs the reader's interest and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact the reader.

/ 25

Logic/Argument Weight: 15%

0 points

Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical.

10.5 points

Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak.

12 points

Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

15 points

Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

/ 15

Support Weight: 20%

0 points

Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident.

14 points

Support is weak or insufficient. Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced.

16 points

Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style.

20 points

Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident.

/ 20

Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%

0 points

Style and voice inappropriate or do not address the given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

7 points

Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

8 points

Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

10 points

Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose and show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

/ 10

Comments/Feedback:

·

Overall Score:

/100