Public health
1
Young adults’ sexual health in the digital age: Perspectives of care providers
Laura E. Anderson1 ,2, Genevieve A. Dingle1, 2, Beth O'Gorman2, Matthew J. Gullo1, 2
1Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, The University of Queensland
2School of Psychology, The University of Queensland
Corresponding author - Laura E. Anderson, [email protected]
This is the preprint version of a published journal article. The published version can be found at doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100534. Please cite as:
Anderson, L. E., Dingle, G. A., O’Gorman, B., & Gullo, M. J. (2020). Young adults’ sexual health in the digital age: Perspectives of care providers. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 100534. doi:10.1016/j. srhc.2020.100534
2
Abstract
Objectives. This study examined care providers’ views on young people’s sexual
health in the digital age. Young people have high rates of sexually transmitted infections
(STIs), indicating sexual risk-taking behaviours. Adolescents transitioning to adulthood may
be particularly at risk due to increased sexual behaviour and exposure to risk factors for
unsafe sex, such as less parental monitoring. These risks may be accentuated in the digital
age, where the availability of dating apps and pornography have potentially influenced young
people’s sexual behaviours. Care providers give a unique insight into sexual health in the
digital age as they are able to identify changes over time.
Study design. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with general
practitioners, nurses, counsellors and university residential college staff (N = 15, six female)
who work with young people aged 17 and 18. Interviews took 20-40 minutes, and were
recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded by the primary researcher and
an independent coder using thematic analysis.
Results. We identified four themes depicting predictors for sexual risk-taking among
young people: media influence on norms (influence on sexual behaviours, relationships and
appearance), transition to adulthood (independence, social opportunity), communication
difficulties (gender and sexuality differences, greater fear of pregnancy than STIs), and
impulsive behaviour (disinhibition, substance use).
Conclusion. Findings highlight targets for prevention of sexual risk-taking among
adolescents, such as addressing changing norms depicted in media. Further, the complex
interplay of contextual and individual factors highlights the need for more comprehensive
theory and holistic approaches to STI prevention.
Keywords: adolescents; risky sexual behaviour; sexually transmitted infections; digital age;
provider perspectives.
3
Young peoples’ sexual health in the digital age: Perspectives of care providers
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a cause of major concern, particularly for
young people aged 15 to 24 years who have some of the highest rates of infection (Kirby
Institute, 2017). Many STIs are asymptomatic, and if left untreated, can cause infertility or
premature death (Gottlieb et al., 2014). Interventions targeting young people (or
‘adolescents’, as per revised definitions of adolescence to including those aged up to 24
years; S. M. Sawyer, Azzopardi, Wickremarathne, & Patton, 2018) have the potential to play
an important role in preventing and treating STIs, as the transition towards adulthood
typically coincides with an increase in sexual behaviour and risk factors for sexual risk-
taking. These factors include: less parental monitoring, greater exposure to peer influence,
greater alcohol and drug use, and changes in identity and peer group (Iyer, Jetten, Tsivrikos,
Postmes, & Haslam, 2009; Loxton, Bunker, Dingle, & Wong, 2015). This risk period is
particularly evident in university residential colleges, where a growing number of Australian
students live (McDonald, Hay, Gecan, Jack, & Hallett, 2015). Therefore, the university
campus provides an important context in which to investigate adolescent sexual risk-taking.
Rates of STIs such as chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis have increased in many
Western countries, including Australia (Kirby Institute, 2017). For example, from 2001 to
2011, the rate of chlamydia diagnoses (the most common STI) tripled among women and
men in Australia (from 152 per 100,000 in 2001, to 502 per 100,000 in 2011 in women; and
from 106 per 100,000 in 2001, to 366 per 100,000 in 2011 in men; ABS, 2012). Eighty-two
percent of these diagnoses were among 15 to 29 year-olds. More recently the increase has
slowed, with rates of chlamydia increasing by 42% from 2008 to 2017 among those aged 15-
24 years (Kirby Institute, 2017). This increase suggests a change in risk-taking behaviours
and in the nature of relationships more broadly. These changes may be due in part to the
‘digital age’ (internet access, including via mobile devices) in which young people have been
increasingly exposed to dating applications (“apps”), accessible pornography, and sexual
content in digital streaming platforms, television series and movies. There is an association
between the use of smartphone dating apps, such as Tinder (heterosexual focus) and Grindr
4
(homosexual focus), and STI risk; however, the relationship complicated (Choi et al., 2017;
A. Sawyer, Smith, & Benotsch, 2017). For example, STI rates began to climb in 2007, while
dating apps became available later. Tinder was created in 2012, and is likely the most widely
used dating app among young people in Western societies, with approximately 57 million
users, and 15 million mutual matches per day (Iqbal, 2018).
There are several theoretical perspectives on risky sexual behaviour among
adolescents (see Buhi & Goodson, 2007 for a review). For example, the Theory of Planned
Behaviour predicts that attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control will determine
engagement in health behaviours (Ajzen, 1991). Social-Cognitive Theory predicts that self-
efficacy will influence outcome expectancies which in turn influences engagement in health
behaviours (Bandura, 2001). An integration of five health behaviour models showed that
self-efficacy (from Social-Cognitive Theory) and partner norms (from the Theory of Planned
Behaviour) were key in predicting condom use in young women (Reid & Aiken, 2011).
Both individual and contextual levels of analysis are important to gain an accurate
understanding of the factors that may influence young people’s sexual behaviour, yet few
theories link individual and contextual factors (Edelman, 2018). The contextual risk factors
may have changed in recent years due to rapid technological developments that have
increased the availability of sexual content (i.e., internet access on mobile devices). Early
research suggests that dating app use is a key risk factor for engaging in risky sexual
behaviours among young people (Choi et al., 2017; A. Sawyer et al., 2017). Therefore, it is
important to investigate the influence of digital media on risky sexual behaviour, and
integrate this new environmental context with existing research and theory on individual
factors, particularly those which are modifiable in interventions.
Known individual predictors of risky sexual behaviour include low self-efficacy (one’s
belief in their own ability; Bandura, 1982) for safe sex, personality traits such as high
impulsivity (heightened propensity to approach rewards and reduced capacity to inhibit
behaviour despite negative consequences; Gullo, Loxton, & Dawe, 2014), and lack of
knowledge about risks and prevention of STIs (Allen & Walter, 2018; Chariyeva, Golin, Earp,
5
& Suchindran, 2012). Other predictors include norms against condom use, sexual coercion
and substance use by individuals and/or partners (Barriger & Velez-Blasini, 2013; de Visser
et al., 2014). Theoretically, greater exposure to online media with sexual content (e.g.,
dating apps, pornography) should influence these individual-level factors (e.g., self-efficacy,
norm perceptions). For example, media observations of sexual behaviour without condom
use (e.g., television shows aimed at young people such as Gossip Girl and Skins) will inform
norms for unsafe sexual behaviour and the expectation that people do not use condoms.
Unlike social group behaviours (e.g., alcohol consumption, eating), sexual behaviour is
normally private, involving only those engaging in the behaviour. Therefore, adolescents –
particularly those who are poorly informed about human sexuality - are likely to be prone to
the influence of media norms. The current cohort of adolescents are beginning to engage in
sexual behaviour during a digital age which includes more sexual references and scenes
than at any other time in history (Strasburger, Jordan, & Donnerstein, 2010). Therefore, the
current study sought to investigate the role of digital media on sexual risk-taking.
While adolescent perspectives on sexual risk-taking have been documented (e.g.,
perspectives on alcohol use and sex, multiple partners, condom useLivingston, Bay-Cheng,
Hequembourg, Testa, & Downs, 2013; Smith, Fenwick, Skinner, Merriman, & Hallett, 2011;
Teitelman, Tennille, Bohinski, Jemmott, & Jemmott, 2013), there is a lack of research from
health practitioners’ perspectives. Health practitioners play a key role in general health care
of adolescents, and the diagnosis and treatment of STIs. Clinicians are identified as a
preferred source of sexual information among adolescents, and a key driver for getting
sexual health testing (Denison, Bromhead, Grainger, Dennison, & Jutel, 2018; Rajapaksa-
Hewageegana, Piercy, Salway, & Samarage, 2015). Similarly, university residential college
staff and student counsellors are providers of student sexual and personal support.
Importantly, unlike adolescents themselves, health practitioners bring experience across
interactions with multiple young people, and can identify changes in trends over time.
Therefore, we interviewed nurses, general practitioners, counsellors, and residential college
staff who work with first year university students, typically aged 17 and 18. The interviews
6
were designed to gain a broad perspective of sexual health among adolescents in the digital
age.
Method
Participants
Participants included 15 key informants (six female) who provide sexual health
information and/or health care in a university (see Table 1). This included seven university
health staff (general practitioners and registered nurses); a university gender and sexuality
counsellor; and seven residential college staff (heads of colleges, deans of students and
resident advisors). Given interviews were in-depth, the aim was specific, and the numbers of
university staff who work in adolescent sexual health are relatively small, a sample size of 15
was sufficient according to published guidelines (Braun & Clarke, 2013; Malterud, Siersma,
& Guassora, 2015) and is consistent with sample sizes in similar research (e.g., Leickly,
Nelson, & Simoni, 2017; Tarzia, Wellington, Marino, & Hegarty, 2018). Informants had
between one and 32 years (mean = 13.5, median = 9.5) experience working with adolescent
sexual health.
< INSERT TABLE 1 HERE >
Procedure
Informants were recruited via email and snowball sampling around a large university
campus in a metropolitan city in Australia. Prior to the interview, informants were emailed an
information sheet, consent form, and a list of interview questions (see Table 2) to give them
a sense of the topics covered. For example, ‘How often do you work with young people in
relation to sexual health?’. Informants were briefed before each interview about the broader
topic (i.e., efforts to reduce STIs among students), which was narrowed for the scope of this
article to risk factors for STIs among adolescents. The semi-structured interviews were
conducted face-to-face by the first author in a quiet room without other people (e.g., care
provider’s office or meeting room) and ran for approximately 20-40 minutes. The interviews
were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from
the relevant university ethics committee.
7
< INSERT TABLE 2 HERE >
Analysis
Data were coded in line with thematic analysis guidelines by Braun and Clarke
(2006). There are a range of qualitative analysis methods, including theory-informed
(deductive) methods and grounded approaches which entirely data driven (inductive; Braun
& Clarke, 2012). For this study were working with well-established social-cognitive and
health behaviour theories, so a deductive approach was most appropriate. The first stages
of the analysis including data familarisation and coding were undertaken by the first and third
authors (female, clinical PhD students). Two coders were used to ensure coding was
comprehensive, representative of the data, and to reduce the risk of bias (Tong, Sainsbury,
& Craig, 2007). Both coders were of equivalent status which facilitated independent coding
without a power differential. The codes for analysis were chosen based on risk factors for
unsafe sex in relation to social-cognitive theories. Theme development included reviewing,
defining and naming themes and was led by the first author in consultation with all authors
(second and last authors were clinical psychologists and researchers).
Results
Care providers indicated contextual and individual risk factors for adolescent sexual
risk-taking. Contextual themes included: media influence on norms (influence on sexual
behaviour, relationships, and appearance), and the transition to adulthood (independence,
social opportunity; see Table 3 for a list of themes and subthemes). Individual themes
included: communication difficulties (gender and sexuality differences, greater fear of
pregnancy than STIs) and impulsive behaviour (disinhibition, substance use; see Figure 1).
< INSERT FIGURE 1 HERE >
< INSERT TABLE 3 HERE >
Contextual Factors
Media influence on norms
Media influence on norms was noted by many care providers as a key factor
impacting sexual risk-taking. “Media” was discussed in terms of television shows, movies,
8
pornography, music, social media (facebook, instagram, snapchat) and dating apps (e.g.,
Tinder and Grindr). When asked specifically about their view of dating apps and social
media (see Table 1), many informants spontaneously mentioned the role of pornography,
movies and other media. Three sub-themes were identified: the impact of media on norms
about: sexual behaviours, sexual relationships, and sexual appearance.
Media influence on sexual behaviour norms. Informants described how media
influence norms about sexual behaviour in ways which may increase STI risk. For example,
movies rarely show characters engaged in sexual health communication. A counsellor
highlighted how this makes it difficult for adolescents to initiate discussion about sexual
health.
“... think about the last movie you watched where two people got together for the first
time. There was no talk about it. There’s no even real hint or anything at sexual
health history talks, about negotiating consent, what is happening, what’s not
happening, negotiating protection.” - Counsellor
Informants also discussed the media portrayal of sex as something that has to be ‘seen
through from start to finish’ without interruptions. This linear sexual script omits
communication, which is important for sexual health (i.e., negotiating sexual behaviours,
barrier protection).
“It’s sort of like with sex ... once you’ve started you have to see it through, but there’s
no start line. They sort of go, “Oh, we’re now doing this. Okay, I have to see it
through,” because there’s no communication at the start of, “Is this going to happen?”
and how it’s going to happen.” - Counsellor
Media influence on sexual behaviour was also discussed in terms of gender roles. For
example, an informant noted the differential influence of pornography on men and women,
where heterosexual pornography may be particularly detrimental for women, who are
frequently depicted as submissive and with low agency.
9
“... especially for women too because porn is often targeted at men and so it’s
designed to make men feel powerful, aroused, excited. It’s more often another man
being very domineering over another woman and a lot of young women will watch
porn to learn more about it and they will see that this is the role that they’re expected
to take as a subservient sort of person who is almost used in sex and they don’t
realise that, no, it’s a two-way street and you have a right to play a very active role in
that if that’s what you’re interested in.” - Counsellor
Informants also described the wide accessibility of pornography, which (like movies) rarely
depicts communication about sexual health or barrier protection.
“I think pornography is a bigger issue today than it probably was. Because, quite
simply, it’s there and it seems everybody is able to access ….people are guided by
what they view or observe into thinking that’s normal, and it’s not...” College staff
member
Media influence on sexual relationship norms. Informants noticed that media
influence the nature of relationships, particularly dating apps, where casual sex is more
accessible and normalised. Dating apps like Tinder may enable greater ‘access’ and
frequency of casual sex and sexual risk-taking.
“... people are feeling the expectation to have more sex than maybe they’re
comfortable with. I think there’s this expectation, especially dating apps, that
everybody has a really high sex drive, which is not correct. … And naturally, with
people feeling that pressure of using online apps to have more sex with more people
more frequently, there’s higher risk of spreading of STIs..” - Counsellor
Further, these apps may discourage deep, emotional relationships, and instead reflect a
culture of short term pleasure-seeking.
10
“I think Tinder and Grindr in particular have taken the romance away from sex. Tinder
and Grindr have been great in giving people the ability to connect easier, but it’s
turned meeting people into online shopping.” - Counsellor
Dating apps may also increase the number of casual sexual relationships by facilitating
transient connections and normalising ‘hook up’ culture.
“I guess the thing that I’ve noticed is that there’s a higher degree of transience in
terms of relationships. .... definitely social media has changed the way people
interact and it makes complete sense that it would have changed the way in which
young people interact with respect to sexual activity.” - College staff member
These quotes show a convergence of perspectives from university-based informants that an
increase in dating app use has led to more casual sex among young people.
Media influence on sexual appearance norms. Although not directly related to
sexual risk, another sign that pornography is influencing adolescents’ sexual behaviour is on
their appearance preferences, specifically pubic hair removal among adolescents and
labiaplasties (female genital cosmetic surgery to trim the labia), among women.
“...you don’t see pubic hair very often anymore. So that’s probably based on social
media and pornography” - Nurse
“We know there’s been a rise in labiaplasties because girls are not wanting to look
too unusual and are getting all this cosmetic stuff so they look like the models in the
porn” - General Practitioner
Overall, the impact of media norms on sexual behaviours, relationships and sexual
appearance was consistently identified as a key factor to address regarding young people’s
sexual health.
Transition to adulthood
11
Many informants highlighted the elevated level of risk for adolescents when they
leave high school, usually aged 17 (in Queensland) or 18 years (other parts of Australia).
Greater independence. Leaving high school and transitioning to work, traineeships
or university was identified as a time of increased independence, with less family influence
and parental monitoring. This heightened independence is particularly evident for
adolescents who have moved away from home and are living with peers. As one informant
described the residential college experience:
“…they’ve just been given the keys to freedom and there are no parents. … they’re
handed alcohol and members of the opposite sex ‘on tap’” - College staff member
Social opportunity. Another informant described the increased number of social
opportunities, particularly at the residential colleges:
“They’ve got all the sporting activities, cultural activities, and then they do all their
celebrations after all of those events and then each of the colleges has their own
parties and then there’s just little get-togethers and dinners and then all of the
birthdays, just uni classes ...they are socialising with a lot of people.” - College staff
member
Informants highlighted that young people’s sexual health is influenced by this developmental
period of independence and social opportunity, particularly in university and residential
college contexts.
Individual-level factors
Communication difficulties
Poor communication was a key individual-level risk factor for sexual risk-taking
identified by informants, which may mirror the lack of sexual health communication in
portrayed media. Informants frequently noted that adolescents reported being motivated to
12
engage in protective behaviours, but did not effectively communicate this to their sexual
partner, and thus did not engage in the protective behaviour.
Gender and sexuality differences. Communication difficulties appeared to be more
prevalent among heterosexual women and those in the LGBTQI+ community. There was
concern about women’s ability to negotiate condom use with men.
“Condoms, it’s a tricky one because females tend to be a little bit more obliging if
their partners don’t like to use condoms” - General Practitioner
Care providers also spoke of their belief that dating apps had contributed to communication
difficulties within sexual relationships, particularly in terms of expectations for casual sex.
For example, dating apps can expose vulnerable people (e.g., marginalised groups) to
exploitation. This highlights the need for good communication skills and an ability to be
assertive.
“... a fellow … who finds partners on, I think it’s Grindr... He had a recent experience
where I think it started out consensual, but then he wanted to pull back. He ... tried to
voice some concerns in some form or other. ….. So it’s really been difficult for him. ...
it worries me that it [Grindr] does expose some very vulnerable people who are
seeking a relationship of some form or other and they can just be made use of.” -
General Practitioner
Some informants also emphasised that communication is required for both safe sex (i.e.,
using barrier protection), and for consensual sex. Particularly for heterosexual women, this
can be challenging once sexual behaviour is initiated, due to fear of retaliation.
“For a few women that I’ve spoken to there’s a fear of violence and aggression if they
say “no” once it’s started. There’s that fear of retaliation, of, “What will happen to
me?” and so it’s almost like that freeze instinct kicks in where it’s just like, “I’m just
13
going to freeze and just get through this and hope for the best,” rather than say, “This
is hurting,” or, “I don’t like the fact that you’re not wearing a condom.” - Counsellor
Greater fear of pregnancy than STIs. Another reason why communication about
barrier protection may be difficult is that there is a greater concern for pregnancy prevention
(which can be achieved with non-barrier methods) than STI prevention. Hormonal
contraception was seen as sufficient due to protection against pregnancy, which was a more
salient concern that STIs.
“...So in my conversations, especially with young men, often the question is asking
women, “Are you on the pill?” That’s as far as any sort of sexual health history, any
sort of consent talk, any sort of negotiating of what they will or won’t be doing if
they’re engaging in sex together goes. ... You can’t have safe sex with someone if
you’re not able to communicate.” – Counsellor
Communication was described by care providers as crucial for safe and health sexual
relationships, and that this was most likely to be difficult for people in relationships with men.
Impulsive behaviour
Many informants talked about adolescents acting impulsively, linked to factors such
as disinhibition and substance use, despite having a fair knowledge of sexual health (i.e., the
need for STI checks, risks of unprotected sex, risks of multiple partners). Disinhibition and
substance use both involve increasing the attraction of pursing immediate short-term reward
in spite of potential negative consequences.
Disinhibition. Informants discussed frustrations with adolescents did not follow
through on their knowledge of sexual health risks due to momentary disregard, or to a loss
of judgement and inhibition.
“...this generation has had more education on sexual things than any generation in
the past and yet they do still seem to have that young, “It’s not going to happen to
14
me.” ... And you talk to them and they go, “I know. I know. I shouldn’t do that.” But it’s
almost like, “It was in the moment.”” - Nurse
Further, informants noted that adolescents who engage in impulsive sexual behaviour often
justify it in terms of how trustworthy/ nice their partner appeared.
“ “No, that person’s a nice girl,” or, “a nice boy,” it doesn’t really matter, “then I just
don’t worry about it [STI risk].”” - Nurse
Substance use. Informants also discussed the role of substance use in increasing
the likelihood of sexual risk-taking. Substance use was described as impacting decision
making.
“Because I think a lot of the problem is, quite often, it’s those decisions are made
when intoxicated or making decisions about sexual health aren’t the same decisions
you would make in a classroom when you’re learning about it in Grade 10 versus
those decisions you’re making at 3:00 am in the morning when you’ve been drinking
for an extended period or [taking] drugs or whatever. Sometimes those things can
get lost, lost along the way.” – Nurse
Informants indicated that impulsive behaviour was often the reason for unsafe sexual
behaviours, and that this lack of impulse control and greater desire is heightened with
substance use.
Discussion
We investigated predictors of sexual risk-taking among older adolescents from the
perspective of care providers. Analysis of interviews with general practitioners, nurses,
counsellors and residential college staff members shows a range of important contextual
factors (media influence on norms, transition to adulthood) and individual factors
(communication difficulties, impulsive behaviour). A hypothesised depiction of relationships
between these factors, based on the data, is presented in Figure 2. Care providers
15
consistently observed that young peoples’ sexual risk-taking is influenced by digital media.
Informants’ reported that the digital age of unprecedented access to sexual content and
dating apps has impacted sexual norms, which in turn has increased sexual risk-taking. This
relationship may be largely mediated by communication difficulties. Informants also
discussed that greater social opportunity and independence during the transition to
adulthood increases risk for young people, particularly for those who are impulsive.
< INSERT FIGURE 2 HERE>
Our findings on media norms and communication difficulties align with the
conclusions of a recent review: that social networking sites have the capacity to convey risk
through compromised interpersonal skills and the promotion of risky norms around sexual
behaviour (Holloway et al., 2014). Informants reported that app use and subsequent casual
relationships undermines sexual communication, increasing STI risk. Given that vulnerability
and honesty are required to communicate about sexual health, communication is likely to be
more difficult in a casual sex context, as opposed to in an existing relationship. Meeting
sexual partners through dating apps in itself may increase the spread of STIs as
transmission can occur between people who would not otherwise meet. In a recent study,
finding sexual partners online was correlated with condomless sex with greater than two
partners (Cabecinha et al., 2017). Similarly, the finding that greater fear of pregnancy than
STIs inhibits communication is supported by research from young people’s perspectives. A
study of young males’ perspectives showed that when a partner was using birth control this
failed to motivate continued use of condoms (Smith et al., 2011).
Pornography and sexually explicit content were seen as detrimental to sexual health
by portraying a linear sexual script (i.e., a model of a behavioural sequence involving
different characters; for an introduction to sexual scripting theory see Simon & Gagnon,
1986) where sexual acts do not include conversations about sexual health and barrier
protection. Further, this sexual script depicted in media is often highly gendered and
heteronormative, whereby men are agents (actors) and women are passive (acted upon;
Charles & Meyrick, 2018). Informants highlighted how this portrayal is detrimental to sexual
16
communication, particularly for heterosexual women, because such norms discourage
assertive communication. Both norms and communication have been shown to play a
central role in sexual behaviour. A systematic review showed that perceived norms are one
of the most stable predictors of adolescent sexual behaviour (Buhi & Goodson, 2007).
Similarly, a meta-analysis concluded that communication is a strong predictor of condom
use (Carlyle & Cole, 2006).
Theoretical implications
The risk factors identified were both contextual (e.g., media norms) and individual
(e.g., communication difficulties), which highlights the need for a holistic approach to
research and prevention. For example, media norms (e.g., not communicating about sexual
health, linear, gendered, and heteronormative sexual script) may undermine confidence in
communicating about sexual health and barrier protection, because it is perceived as norm-
inconsistent or abnormal, thus leading to sexual risk-taking behaviours, see Figure 2.
Importantly, risky sexual behaviour depends on opportunity for sexual behaviour, which is
influenced by factors inherent to the transition to university (less parental monitoring, more
socialising). The combination of opportunity for sexual behaviour and impulsivity (substance
use, disinhibition) is likely to increase risky sexual behaviour (Johnson, Albery, Frings, &
Moss, 2018), particularly when communication about safe sex preferences is poor. Carefully
controlled studies are needed to test health behaviour change theories such as the Theory
of Planned Behaviour and the Health Action Process Approach (Ajzen, 1991; Schwarzer &
Luszczynska, 2008) to determine the complex interactions between factors.
Practical implications
Given this study was conducted in an applied context, there are a number of practical
implications for those working with young people to reduce sexual risk-taking.
Media influence on norms. Informants believe media including pornography,
movies and dating apps had a negative impact on adolescents’ sexual behaviour,
relationships and appearance. This suggests that interventions should acknowledge and
address media representations, and identify the ways in which they are unrealistic and
17
unhealthy to reduce inaccurate norm formation. Interventions could help adolescents to
engage in critical reflection on the accuracy or limitations of media portrays of sex. Further,
producers of sexual media content could also design it in such a way that helps viewers to
challenge unhealthy sexual portrayals. Technology may even be used to increase safe sex
practices. For example, it may be easier to negotiate STI testing and condom use via text
messages rather than face-to-face. Similarly, app developers could include an option in
dating apps to indicate whether one practices safe sex.
Transition to adulthood. Leaving high school was regarded as a risky period for
adolescence due to increased independence and social opportunity. This was particularly
highlighted for students who move to the residential colleges, as they are usually living out of
their family home for the first time, and are surrounded by peers. Subsequently, students
moving into colleges may benefit from extra support in this area from college staff members,
university general practitioners, nurses and counsellors. For example, residential colleges
could facilitate workshops to enhance adolescent skills and knowledge about safe sex
practices. A recent systematic review found that college interventions with motivational
interviewing or reminder cues were most effective in increasing condom use (Kilwein, Kern,
& Looby, 2017).
Communication difficulties. Interventions should help to teach adolescents sexual
communication skills, and particularly address inequality and discrimination. For example,
gendered challenges for women negotiating condom use with men, and challenges for
people who do not identify as part of the heteronormative population (i.e., people who
identify as LGBTQIA+) should be discussed (Thitasan, Aytar, Annerback, & Velandia, 2019).
Young people who are not hetero or cis-gendered may have greater difficulty due to stigma
and ignorance from sexual partners. Among female undergraduate students, the greater
one’s perception that women are subordinate to men, the lower the frequency of discussing
sexual history or condom use (Bui et al., 2012). Therefore, norms and beliefs impact
communication self-efficacy. Further, frameworks for discussing sexual health and behaviour
may be useful to increase communication self-efficacy. As one informant highlighted, the
18
use of a ‘traffic light system’ can help. This system may have been adapted from the ‘Traffic
lights framework’ for sexual behaviours in children (True Relationships and Reproductive
Health, 2015). Before initiating sexual behaviour with a new partner, adolescents are
encouraged to chat about what they are keen for (green), what they are not sure about -
they might like or might not (orange), and what they do not want to do (red). These states
are dynamic and important to chat about before, during and after sexual behaviour. This
portrayal of a ‘healthy’ sexual script that is easy to remember may help to increase self-
efficacy (‘I know how to communicate about this now’), particularly if intoxicated. It may be
useful to address the linear, heteronormative script portrayed in media, and provide this
alternative script.
Interestingly, research on sexually risky behaviour such as drinking alcohol before
sex from the perspective of young women shows the complexity of sexual communication in
this gendered context. Young women described the risks of drinking before sex (risk of
regret and coercion), but also perceived advantages regarding social and sexual interactions
(facilitating social and sexual interactions, excusing unsanctioned sexual behaviour;
Livingston et al., 2013). The authors suggest prevention efforts need to address social
needs and the larger cultural context. This is particularly crucial when the heterosexual norm
is for women to be acted upon.
Impulsive behaviour. Informants indicated that young people often engaged in risk-
taking behaviour despite sufficient sexual health knowledge. A recent meta-analytic review
supports the notion that risky sexual behaviours are associated with trait impulsivity (Dir,
Coskunpinar, & Cyders, 2014). While it is not possible or necessarily desirable to reduce
trait impulsivity, it may be beneficial to help adolescents manage their impulses in the
context of sexual health. Also, the discrepancy between knowledge and behaviour indicates
that interventions need to focus on motivational factors (e.g., wanting to avoid condoms
because they reduce sensation, or to please a partner) rather than knowledge and skills
alone. Cooper, Agocha, and Sheldon (2000) demonstrated that motives (i.e., specific
reasons for choosing a behaviour) mediate the link between impulsivity and sexual risk-
19
taking. Motivational enhancement may include non-judgmental, value-independent
education about sexual health and discussion of one’s sexual health goals. This discussion
could include the benefits and costs of different choices, and how easy it is to get regularly
tested for STIs. Interventions addressing impulsive behaviour could also address the role of
alcohol, thinking through consequences, and having an awareness of one’s own desires
regarding sexual health before initiating sexual activity.
There are a few limitations of this study that give rise to future directions. The nature
of this study meant it had an individual focus as opposed to a dyadic focus. A future study
could involve sexual partners and relational factors. Also, data were collected across one
university, albeit the largest in the state, therefore it may not be generalisable to different
contexts. Further, the diversity of informant job positions has some limitations. For example,
only nurses are in a position to notice changes in pubic hair (sexual appearance norms),
whereas counsellors and college staff are more likely to notice changes in relationship
norms. Also, three of the 15 informant had less than 6 years of experience, meaning that
their ability to comment on changes over time was limited. Future studies could investigate
different populations of care providers (e.g., rural locations, younger adolescent care
providers), and other study designs (focus groups, surveys, experiments) to enhance our
understanding of sexual health in the digital age. It is important to note that while care
providers give valuable insight, these perspectives may differ to young peoples'
perspectives, particularly in regards to relationship with digital media.
Strengths include that the care providers are very close to the sexual practices and
health of young people (working only with this population), and have experienced this work
over time (in contrast to young people themselves who are less able to notice changes over
time). Also the diversity of care providers interviewed helped to gain medical, social and
psychological perspectives on overall sexual wellbeing.
In conclusion, this qualitative study provided new insights into the changing nature of
adolescent sexual risk-taking by investigating the perspective of health practitioners. Health
practitioners bring a depth of experience and knowledge about adolescents, their behaviour
20
and STI risk. These findings contribute to our understanding of the complex interplay of
contextual and individual factors, which requires more comprehensive theory, such as
understanding the interplay between impulsive behaviours, motivational factors and
communication skills. This could expand existing theoretical constructs in the Theory of
Planned Behaviour and Health Action Process Approach such as self-efficacy and
expectancies (Ajzen, 1991; Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008). Further, the important role of
digital media highlights the need for more holistic approaches to STI prevention, which
address unhealthy norms depicted in media.
21
Acknowledgments
Thank you to all the informants in this study.
Declaration of interest statement
No financial interest or benefits.
22
Tables
Table 1: Care provider details (names have been changed)
Name Job Title Years of experience
Rani College staff member 8 Julie General Practitioner 9.5
George General Practitioner 24
Robert General Practitioner 32
Lucy General Practitioner 30
James College staff member 2.5
Anthony College staff member 9
Nicole Nurse 6
Sarah Nurse 16
Rebecca Nurse 10
Oscar College staff member 5.5
Michael College staff member 24
Samuel College staff member 1
Andrew Counsellor 4
23
Table 2: Semi-structured interview questions.
Topic Interview questions
Your role How long have you been working in this area? How often do you work with young people in relation to sexual health? Follow up:
● When working with young people about sexual health, what brings up this topic?
● Do you usually see the same young person more than once regarding sexual health?
● When do you refer out to a sexual health service? How do you find the interactions with young people regarding safe sex? Follow up:
● How do think young people find these interactions?
The problem Have young people’s sexual behaviour and views changed in the age of social media and dating apps?
● If so, how?
The solution Have you seen prevention efforts in this area? Follow up:
● What is it about those programs that enables them to work well, or not so well?
How could you be more supported as a health practitioner/professional working with young people’s sexual health?
24
Table 3. Themes and Subthemes
Theme Subtheme
Contextual
Media influence on norms
Sexual behaviours
Sexual relationships
Sexual appearance
Transition to university Independence
Social opportunity
Individual
Communication difficulties Gender and sexuality differences
Greater fear of pregnancy than STIs
Impulsive behaviours Disinhibition
Substance use
25
Figures
Figure 1
Transition to university
Media influence on norms
Impulsivity
Communication difficulties
Contextual factors Individual factors
Sexual risk-taking
Figure 2
Media Norms
Impulsive behaviours
Communication difficulties Risky sexual
behaviour
Transition to university
Contextual Individual
26
Figure captions
Figure 1. Thematic map describing university informants’ perspectives on predictors of
sexual risk-taking behaviours.
Figure 2. Diagrammatic summary of hypothesized relationships between themes predicting
risky sexual behaviour among university-based adolescents.
27
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
Allen, M. S., & Walter, E. E. (2018). Linking big five personality traits to sexuality and sexual
health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. doi:10.1037/bul0000157
Barriger, M., & Velez-Blasini, C. J. (2013). Descriptive and Injunctive Social Norm
Overestimation in Hooking Up and Their Role as Predictors of Hook-Up Activity in a
College Student Sample. Journal of Sex Research, 50(1), 84-94.
doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.607928
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist,
37(2), 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of
Psychology, 52, 1-26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research
in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In APA Handbook of Research Methods
in Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57-71). doi:10.1037/13620-004
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for
Beginners: SAGE Publications.
Buhi, E. R., & Goodson, P. (2007). Predictors of Adolescent Sexual Behavior and Intention:
A Theory-Guided Systematic Review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(1), 4-21.
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.027
Bui, T. C., Markham, C. M., Ross, M. W., Williams, M. L., Beasley, R. P., Tran, L. T. H., . . .
Le, T. N. (2012). Perceived gender inequality, sexual communication self-efficacy,
and sexual behaviour among female undergraduate students in the Mekong Delta of
Vietnam. Sexual Health, 9(4), 314-322. doi:10.1071/SH11067
28
Cabecinha, M., Mercer, C. H., Gravningen, K., Aicken, C., Jones, K. G., Tanton, C., . . .
Field, N. (2017). Finding sexual partners online: prevalence and associations with
sexual behaviour, STI diagnoses and other sexual health outcomes in the British
population. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 93(8), 572-282. doi:10.1136/sextrans-
2016-052994
Carlyle, K., & Cole, C. (2006). Why Communication Is Crucial: Meta-Analysis of the
Relationship Between Safer Sexual Communication and Condom Use AU - Noar,
Seth M. Journal of Health Communication, 11(4), 365-390.
doi:10.1080/10810730600671862
Chariyeva, Z., Golin, C. E., Earp, J. A., & Suchindran, C. (2012). Does motivational
interviewing counseling time influence HIV-positive persons' self-efficacy to practice
safer sex? Patient Education and Counseling, 87(1), 101-107.
doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.021
Charles, P., & Meyrick, J. (2018). Exploring the way sexually explicit material informs sexual
beliefs, understanding and practices of young men: A qualitative survey. Journal of
Health Psychology, 1359105318788736. doi:10.1177/1359105318788736
Choi, E. P. H., Wong, J. Y. H., Lo, H. H. M., Wong, W., Chio, J. H. M., & Fong, D. Y. T.
(2017). Association Between Using Smartphone Dating Applications and Alcohol and
Recreational Drug Use in Conjunction With Sexual Activities in College Students.
Substance Use & Misuse, 52(4), 422-428. doi:10.1080/10826084.2016.1233566
Cooper, M. L., Agocha, V. B., & Sheldon, M. S. (2000). A motivational perspective on risky
behaviors: The role of personality and affect regulatory processes. Journal of
Personality, 68(6), 1059-1088. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00126
de Visser, R. O., Badcock, P. B., Rissel, C., Richters, J., Smith, A. M. A., Grulich, A. E., &
Simpson, J. M. (2014). Experiences of sexual coercion in a representative sample of
adults: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Sexual Health,
11(5), 472-480. doi:10.1071/sh14103
29
Denison, H. J., Bromhead, C., Grainger, R., Dennison, E. M., & Jutel, A. (2018). What
influences university students to seek sexually transmitted infection testing?: A
qualitative study in New Zealand. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 16, 56-60.
doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2018.01.004
Dir, A. L., Coskunpinar, A., & Cyders, M. A. (2014). A meta-analytic review of the
relationship between adolescent risky sexual behavior and impulsivity across gender,
age, and race. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(7), 551-562.
doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.08.004
Edelman, N. (2018). Towards a critical epidemiology approach for applied sexual health
research. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(2), 161-174.
doi:10.1177/1359105317743768
Gottlieb, S. L., Low, N., Newman, L. M., Bolan, G., Kamb, M., & Broutet, N. (2014). Toward
global prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs): The need for STI
vaccines. Vaccine, 32(14), 1527-1535. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.087
Gullo, M. J., Loxton, N. J., & Dawe, S. (2014). Impulsivity: Four ways five factors are not
basic to addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 39(11), 1547-1556.
doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.01.002
Holloway, I. W., Dunlap, S., del Pino, H. E., Hermanstyne, K., Pulsipher, C., & Landovitz, R.
J. (2014). Online Social Networking, Sexual Risk and Protective Behaviors:
Considerations for Clinicians and Researchers. Current Addiction Reports, 1(3), 220-
228. doi:10.1007/s40429-014-0029-4
Iqbal, M. (2018). Tinder Revenue and Usage Statistics Retrieved from
http://www.businessofapps.com/data/tinder-statistics/
Iyer, A., Jetten, J., Tsivrikos, D., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2009). The more (and the
more compatible) the merrier: Multiple group memberships and identity compatibility
as predictors of adjustment after life transitions. British Journal of Social Psychology,
48(4), 707-733. doi:10.1348/014466608X397628
30
Johnson, H. L., Albery, I. P., Frings, D., & Moss, A. C. (2018). STI-protective self-efficacy
and binge drinking in a sample of university students in the United Kingdom. Sexual
& Reproductive Healthcare, 17, 19-25. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2018.05.004
Kilwein, T. M., Kern, S. M., & Looby, A. (2017). Interventions for Alcohol-Related Risky
Sexual Behaviors Among College Students: A Systematic Review. Psychology of
Addictive Behaviors. doi:10.1037/adb0000294
Kirby Institute. (2017). HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia:
Annual surveillance report 2017. Retrieved from Sydney:
https://kirby.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/kirby/report/SERP_Annual-Surveillance-
Report-2017_compressed.pdf
Leickly, E., Nelson, K., & Simoni, J. (2017). Sexually Explicit Online Media, Body
Satisfaction, and Partner Expectations Among Men who have Sex with Men: a
Qualitative Study. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14(3), 270-274.
doi:10.1007/s13178-016-0248-7
Livingston, J. A., Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Hequembourg, A. L., Testa, M., & Downs, J. S. (2013).
Mixed Drinks and Mixed Messages: Adolescent Girls' Perspectives on Alcohol and
Sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 38-50.
doi:10.1177/0361684312464202
Loxton, N. J., Bunker, R. J., Dingle, G. A., & Wong, V. (2015). Drinking not thinking: A
prospective study of personality traits and drinking motives on alcohol consumption
across the first year of university. Personality and Individual Differences, 79(C), 134-
139. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.010
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2015). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview
Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-
1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
McDonald, P., Hay, D., Gecan, I., Jack, M., & Hallett, S. (2015). National Census of
University Student Accommodation Providers 2014. Retrieved from Subiaco,
Western Australia: http://universitycollegesaustralia.edu.au/wp-
31
content/uploads/2015/06/2015-05-
27_uca_census_2014_report_final_lowres_sec.pdf
Rajapaksa-Hewageegana, N., Piercy, H., Salway, S., & Samarage, S. (2015). Sexual and
reproductive knowledge, attitudes and behaviours in a school going population of Sri
Lankan adolescents. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 6(1), 3-8.
doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2014.08.001
Reid, A. E., & Aiken, L. S. (2011). Integration of five health behaviour models: common
strengths and unique contributions to understanding condom use. Psychol Health,
26(11), 1499-1520. doi:10.1080/08870446.2011.572259
Sawyer, A., Smith, E. R., & Benotsch, E. G. (2017). Dating Application Use and Sexual Risk
Behavior Among Young Adults. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(2), 183-
191. doi:10.1007/s13178-017-0297-6
Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018). The age of
adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2(3), 223-228.
doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1
Schwarzer, R., & Luszczynska, A. (2008). How to overcome health-compromising behaviors
- The health action process approach. European Psychologist, 13(2), 141-151.
doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.2.141
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). SEXUAL SCRIPTS - PERMANENCE AND CHANGE.
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97-120. doi:10.1007/bf01542219
Smith, J. L., Fenwick, J., Skinner, R., Merriman, G., & Hallett, J. (2011). Young males'
perspectives on pregnancy, fatherhood and condom use: Where does responsibility
for birth control lie? Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2(1), 37-42.
doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2010.10.002
Strasburger, V. C., Jordan, A. B., & Donnerstein, E. (2010). Health Effects of Media on
Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 125(4), 756-767. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2563
32
Tarzia, L., Wellington, M., Marino, J., & Hegarty, K. (2018). "A Huge, Hidden Problem":
Australian Health Practitioners' Views and Understandings of Reproductive Coercion.
Qualitative Health Research, 1049732318819839. doi:10.1177/1049732318819839
Teitelman, A. M., Tennille, J., Bohinski, J., Jemmott, L. S., & Jemmott, J. B., 3rd. (2013).
Urban adolescent girls' perspectives on multiple partners in the context of the sexual
double standard and intimate partner violence. Journal of the Association of Nurses
in AIDS Care, 24(4), 308-321. doi:10.1016/j.jana.2013.04.001
Thitasan, A., Aytar, O., Annerback, E. M., & Velandia, M. (2019). Young people's health and
risk behaviours in relation to their sexual orientation: A cross-sectional study of
Thailand and Sweden. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 21, 67-74.
doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2019.05.004
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative
research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International
Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 356. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
True Relationships and Reproductive Health. (2015). Traffic Lights Framework. Retrieved
from
https://www.true.org.au/ArticleDocuments/337/Traffic%20LightsBrochure.pdf.aspx?E
mbed=Y