managerial accounting case analysis
|
Model |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
R2D2 |
BB8 |
|
Sales |
$11,125,000 |
90,00,000 |
21,25,000 |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
69,00,000 |
54,90,000 |
14,10,000 |
|
Gross Margin |
42,25,000 |
35,10,000 |
7,15,000 |
|
Less: Selling and Administrative Expenses |
36,75,000 |
34,50,000 |
2,25,000 |
|
Operating Income |
$550,000 |
60,000 |
4,90,000 |
|
Number of Units Produced and Sold |
|
30,000 |
5,000 |
|
LABOR HOURS per unit |
|
2 |
3 |
|
LABOR HOURS |
75000 |
60000 |
15000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREDETERMINED ABSORPTION RATE |
36 |
per labor hour |
|
|
(BASED ON LABOR HOURS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DETAILS OF TRADITIONAL COSTING SYSTEM |
|
|
|
|
|
R2D2 |
BB8 |
|
|
Direct materials |
2250000 |
600000 |
|
|
Direct Labor |
1080000 |
270000 |
|
|
PRIME COST |
3330000 |
870000 |
4200000 |
|
Factory overheads |
2160000 |
540000 |
2700000 |
|
TOTAL PRODUCT COST |
5490000 |
1410000 |
6900000 |
|
Units |
30,000 |
5,000 |
|
|
PRODUCT COST PER UNIT |
183 |
282 |
|
|
(EXCLUDING Selling and Admistrative exp) |
|
|
|
|
Add SELLING per unit |
115 |
45 |
|
|
TOTAL COST PER UNIT |
298 |
327 |
|
|
SELLING PRICE PER UNIT |
300 |
425 |
|
As per traditional costing system, both products are looking profitable as selling price in both cases exceed the cost per unit.
ANALYSIS UNDER ACTIVITY BASED COSTING SYSTEM
|
Activity Cost Pool |
Estimated Overhead Costs |
Total |
R2D2 |
BB8 |
COST DRIVER RATES |
R2D2 |
BB8 |
|
Machine setups (number of setups) |
3,12,000 |
1,600 |
1,000 |
600 |
195 |
195000 |
117000 |
|
Quality control (number of inspections) |
5,40,000 |
9,000 |
4,000 |
5,000 |
60 |
240000 |
300000 |
|
Purchase orders (number of orders) |
1,35,000 |
1,200 |
840 |
360 |
112.5 |
94500 |
40500 |
|
Soldering (number of solder joints) |
6,75,000 |
2,00,000 |
60,000 |
1,40,000 |
3.375 |
202500 |
472500 |
|
Shipments (number of shipments) |
1,98,000 |
600 |
400 |
200 |
330 |
132000 |
66000 |
|
Machine-related (machine-hours) |
8,40,000 |
70,000 |
30,000 |
40,000 |
12 |
360000 |
480000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1224000 |
1476000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R2D2 |
BB8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct materials |
2250000 |
600000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Labor |
1080000 |
270000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRIME COST |
3330000 |
870000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factory overheads |
1224000 |
1476000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL PRODUCT COST |
4554000 |
2346000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
30,000 |
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRODUCT COST PER UNIT |
151.8 |
469.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(EXCLUDING Selling and Admistrative exp) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add SELLING per unit |
115 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COST PER UNIT |
266.8 |
514.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELLING PRICE PER UNIT |
300 |
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
From above ABC analysis it is very clear that BB8 is a loss making item. Its basic product cost (Even excluding selling costs) exceeds the selling price and after putting selling cost there is huge loss per unit.
RECOMMENDATIONS
There should not be any sense in increasing or expanding sales of a loss making item. BB8 sales should not be expanded.
Decision making using traditional costing can be very dangerous as traditional costing subsidizes cost of one product at the cost the other product. ABC gives better decisions.
“BB8 seems to sell itself” as they are selling it below cost. For consumers, it’s a win win situation but for seller it is not advisable.
In order to improve overall profits of the company the company should either increase the selling price of BB8 or discontinue its production and sale as every incremental unit of BB8 creates extra loss for the company
UTILITY OF ABC
ABC helps in bringing cost relationship with its cost drivers and hence is very useful in decision making. It explains the undercosting and undercosting created under the traditional costing. Activity based costing does not charge any general overheads on single basis but for every activity there is a separate most reasonable factor affecting it (called cost driver). ABC provides best support for managerial strategic decision making.