W8A5 RATIO ANALYSIS

NURS_6211_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConduct a financial analysis using the three scenarios provided in the Excel Assignment Workbook. This assignment will be completed on 3 separate tabs named: - W8A5a Expense Forecasting - W8A5b Breakeven Analysis - W8A5c Marginal Profit and Loss Using the Healthcare Budget Request Guide for guidance, complete the three scenarios: expense forecasting, break-even, marginal profit and loss for the scenarios provided. What do these analyses mean for your organization?

90 to >80.0 ptsExcellentThe analysis clearly and accurately presents ratio analyses for cost-benefit, break-even, and marginal cost. ... Ratios are calculated accurately and as directed. ... The analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific summary and interpretation of results that includes responses to questions that demonstrate ability to apply interpretation of results.

80 to >71.0 ptsGoodThe analysis accurately presents ratio analyses for cost-benefit, break-even, and marginal cost. ... Ratios are calculated accurately. ... The analysis provides a relatively complete, detailed, and specific summary and interpretation of results that includes responses to questions that demonstrate ability to apply interpretation of results.

71 to >53.0 ptsFairThe analysis inaccurately presents ratio analyses for cost-benefit, break-even, and marginal cost. ... Ratios are calculated inaccurately. ... The analysis provides an incomplete, inaccurate, or vague summary and interpretation of results, and/or responses to questions that misinterpret results.

53 to >0 ptsPoorThe analysis presents a budget that is vague, incomplete, or inaccurate in its portrayal of estimated expenses and revenues, or has items missing. ... Ratios are calculated inaccurately or are missing. ... The analysis provides an incomplete, inaccurate, or vague summary and interpretation of results, and/or responses to questions that misinterpret results or has items missing.

90 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity that delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time or were not provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts