Education Writing assignment 1MR

WrittenAssignment1.docx

Home >Education homework help >Education Writing assignment 1MR

Written Assignment – Personal Philosophy of Education

This is a personal Vision and Mission Assignment. When we look at organizations from past and the present as well as apply conjecture into the future, obstacles will emerge, whether in (a) our career paths; (b) the way subordinates, colleagues, and superiors view us (c) our leadership style; and (d) the preparation needed to best accelerate our professional opportunities especially in a global and highly diverse world. Organizations are represented by people from a vast array of backgrounds and life experiences (i.e., personal, professional). Since we must work in a “diverse” world, introspection regarding our own leadership, communication, and thinking styles is key to understanding our successes and failures as leaders.

As an aspiring leader, it is critical that you understand leadership issues through many lenses. For this assignment, you are asked to create a personal philosophy addressing the topic “What Is Leadership and Who You are as a Leader.” In addition, you will need to include a minimum of 5 scholarly resources to support your positions.

Successful responses to this assignment should be relevant to your future as a leader, both personally and professionally. Through this assignment, you should learn more about yourself as well as be able to assess key characteristics of organizations. In your research, you should look at other future thinking organizations that are continually changing and redefining the way they conduct business and deal with the culture.

For this assignment, you may write in the first person where applicable (especially with your survey results).

Your paper will be organized with the bolded subtitles and the content as follows:

Title Page: Personal Philosophy of Education

Educational Leadership: Define Educational leadership: from research as well as your opinion;

I am a Leader: Explain who you are as an educational leader;

A Legacy: Imagine what your legacy would be;

Leadership Strengths: Reflect on strengths and areas to develop; and

Leadership Obstacles: Justify your actions to overcome obstacles.

Conclusion

References: 5 scholarly references

Personal Philosophy of Education Rubric

Criteria	Exemplary (10)	Acceptable (8)	Developing (7)
Organization	Extremely well organized; logical format was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to the other and cleverly conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of the paper	Somewhat organized; ideas were not coherently presented as the transitions were not always smooth, which at times distracted the reader	Choppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow; transitions to ideas were abrupt and seriously distracted the reader
Content and Response to the Topic and Questions	Completely accurate; all facts were precise and explicit	Accurate; more than a few inconsistencies or errors in information	Completely inaccurate facts in this project were misleading to the audience/reader
Research/References	Exceeded expectations to research information; solicited material in addition to what was provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance project; utilized many resources to make paper effective	Used the material provided in an acceptable manner but did not consult any additional resources	Did not use resources effectively; little or no gathering of outside information on the topic
Mechanics	Presented with originality; a unique approach that truly enhanced the project. No grammatical, spelling, NSU style, or APA errors	Presented with originality and no more than 2-3 grammatical, spelling, NSU style, or APA errors	Presented limited originality and was predictable. More than 3 grammatical, spelling, NSU style, or APA Errors
Quality of Communication	Written Communication: The candidate employed high quality written communication that demonstrates the proper use of conventions of English language with zero errors.	Written Communication: The candidate employed high quality written communication that demonstrates the proper use of conventions of English language with three or fewer errors.	Written Communication: The candidate demonstrated little or no ability to high quality written communication that demonstrates the proper use of conventions of English language with four or more errors.
	Format: The candidate adhered to the Written Assignment Format, APA, if applicable with no errors.	Format: The candidate adhered to the Written Assignment Format, APA, if applicable with less than three errors.	Format: The candidate demonstrated little or no ability to adhere to the Written Assignment Format, APA, if applicable with more than three errors.
	References: The candidate utilized more than five scholarly references	References: The candidate utilized five scholarly references	References: The candidate utilized fewer than five scholarly references