Business Finance - Operations Management CASE STUDY: HISTORICAL FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT

profileBeautifulFlower
WritingGradingRubric2.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Content and Development

40 to >35 pts

Advanced

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. All topics are thoroughly addressed and/or all questions are answered. Minimum word count is reached.

35 to >27 pts

Proficient

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. All or most topics are generally but not comprehensively addressed and all or most questions are answered. Minimum word count is reached.

27 to >0 pts

Developing

Assignment is missing key elements; lacks contextual presentation and the central thesis of the project is unclear. Information has little or no relation to the main topic. Topics and/or questions were not addressed satisfactorily. Minimum word count is not reached.

0 pts

Not Present

40 pts

Writing Grading Rubric | BUSI645_B02_202330

Criteria Ratings Points

Depth and Organization

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. Ideas flow in a logical sequence. The structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow. The paper’s organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. Paragraph transitions are present, logical, and direct the flow of thought throughout the paper. The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas. The conclusion reviews the major points toward the appropriate audience.

26 to >20 pts

Proficient

The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews most major points. Ideas flow in a fairly logical sequence. The structure of the paper is somewhat hard to follow. The paper’s organization does not emphasize the central theme or purpose. Paragraph transitions are mostly present, logical, and direct the flow of thought throughout the paper. Comprehensive conclusion missing.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews one or two major points. Some breaks in logic are present. The structure of the paper is somewhat clear and easy to follow. The paper’s organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. Paragraph transitions are missing on some sections. The conclusion somewhat derives from the paper’s ideas. The conclusion may not review the major points toward the appropriate audience.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Writing Grading Rubric | BUSI645_B02_202330

Criteria Ratings Points

Grammar/ Punctuation/ Spelling and Formatting

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. Spelling is correct. The paper follows APA format guidelines. The paper is written in 12pt font, Times New Roman, double-spaced and 1” margins. The work is original, giving credit to all borrowed ideas.

26 to >20 pts

Proficient

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are generally followed but some mistakes are evident. Spelling is correct. The paper follows APA format guidelines but with some mistakes. The paper is written in 12pt font, Times New Roman, double-spaced and 1” margins. The work is original, giving credit to all borrowed ideas.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are generally followed but many mistakes are evident. Spelling is incorrect in places. The paper fails to follow APA format guidelines to include: Written in 12pt font, Times New Roman, double- spaced and 1” margins. The work is original, giving credit to all borrowed ideas.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Total Points: 100

Writing Grading Rubric | BUSI645_B02_202330