Writing assignment 4N
reynolds3226
Writingassignment4.docxWriting assignment 4
Part 1
Interview a principal on the following topics and then summarize the responses of the administrator into a paper. Questions should include the following:
Selection
How do you advertise a vacancy? District website, Facebook
How do you select the candidates to be interviewed?
How do you interview the candidates?
How do you check for references and credentials?
How do you select the best candidate?
How and when do you offer the job?
How and when do you offer the candidate the position?
How do you notify unsuccessful candidates?
Induction
· How do you acquaint new employees to the school/faculty, staff and community?
· Does your district have an induction program? If not, does the school sponsor one?
Appraisal
· How do you evaluate the staff?
· What instruments are used and how often?
· How do you collect data to be used?
Staff Development
· How do you determine the needs of the faculty/staff for staff development?
· How is the final decision made on what will be offered?
Rewards/incentives
· Is there a reward or incentive program in your district or school? Sign on bonus
Note: The written interview report must contain the proper NSU cover sheet and reference page. Be sure to summarize the responses not just list them.
Assignment #4 - Part 1: Field Experience Paper - Grading Rubric
|
Exceed (10) |
Met (9-6) |
Partially Met (5-3) |
Not Met (2-0) |
|
Paper is very well organized and demonstrates proper use of conventions in the English language with zero errors. The quality of the writing is superior and clearly reflects the scholarly nature of the assignment |
Paper is well organized and demonstrates proper use of conventions in the English language with one to two errors. The quality of the writing is good and appropriate for the scholarly nature of the assignment. |
Paper contains some issues with organization and demonstrates limited proper use of conventions in the English language with three to five errors. The quality of the writing is fair and minimally appropriate for the scholarly nature of the assignment. |
Paper is poorly organized and demonstrates minimal or no proper use of conventions in the English language with six or more errors. The quality of the writing is poor and not appropriate for the scholarly nature of the assignment. |
|
It clearly and comprehensively addresses all required questions for the interview and included more than three additional meaningful questions. |
It appropriately addresses all the required questions for the interview and included one to three additional questions. |
It partially addresses most of the required questions for the interview. |
It fails to appropriately address most of the required questions for the interview. |
|
The summary by the author demonstrates a deep understanding of the fundamental issues and associated factors. Incorporates several research sources into the narrative in an effective manner. |
The summary by the author demonstrates an understanding of the fundamental issues and associated factors. Included some relevant research into the narrative. |
The summary by the author demonstrates a basic understanding of the fundamental issues and associated factors. No relevant research was present in the narrative. |
The summary by the author demonstrates a lack of understanding of the fundamental issue and associated factors. No or inappropriate references to the research are present. |
|
APA 7 edition format followed. (0 errors found) |
APA 7 edition format followed consistently. (1 to 2 errors found) |
APA 7 edition format generally followed. (3 or more errors found) |
Numerous (4 or more) APA 7 edition format errors were present |
