|
Criteria
|
No Submission
|
Novice
|
Basic
|
Proficient
|
Exceptional
|
Criterion Score
|
|
Purpose (20 Points) Purpose Identifies the purpose/goal for the paper.
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
14 points
Section Points Possible (less than 15 points)
Identification of purpose is vague and does not elaborate/exemplify the purpose.
|
16 points
Section Points Possible (15-16 points)
Identification of purpose is vague with only limited elaboration/exemplification.
|
18 points
Section Points Possible (17-18 points)
Clearly identifies the purpose of the writing, with only limited elaboration/exemplification.
|
20 points
Section Points Possible (19-20 points)
Clearly identifies the purpose of the writing using elaboration/exemplification and/or the vocabulary of the discipline (as appropriate).
|
/ 20
Score of Purpose (20 Points) Purpose Identifies the purpose/goal for the paper.,
|
|
Information (30 Points) Information Response includes additional information to support the paper
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
23 points
Section Points Possible (less than 23 points)
Information used is incomplete, incorrect, or biased.
|
25 points
Section Points Possible (23-25 points)
Information used comes from reliable sources but is not appropriate to the paper.
|
28 points
Section Points Possible (26-28 points)
Information used comes from reliable sources and is appropriate to the paper.
|
30 points
Section Points Possible (29-30 points)
Information used comes from reliable sources within the discipline, is appropriate to the paper, and presents a coherent, clear picture.
|
/ 30
Score of Information (30 Points) Information Response includes additional information to support the paper,
|
|
Concepts (30 Points) Concepts Relevant terminology is included and used correctly.
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
23 points
Section Points Possible (less than 23 points)
Concepts are not identified.
|
25 points
Section Points Possible (23-25 points)
Concepts are identified, but not clearly defined. No attempt to elaborate/ exemplify.
|
28 points
Section Points Possible (26-28 points)
Some concepts are clearly defined using elaboration/ exemplification.
|
30 points
Section Points Possible (29-30 points)
All relevant concepts are clearly defined using elaboration/ exemplification.
|
/ 30
Score of Concepts (30 Points) Concepts Relevant terminology is included and used correctly.,
|
|
Grammar and Spelling (10 Points)
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
7 points
Section Points Possible (less than 8 points)
Writer makes errors in grammar and/or spelling which significantly affect the flow the paper
|
8 points
Section Points Possible (8 points)
Writer makes errors in grammar and/or spelling that make the ability to follow the paper considerably more difficult
|
9 points
Section Points Possible (9 points)
Writer makes errors in grammar and/or spelling that make the ability to follow the paper more difficult
|
10 points
Section Points Possible (10 points)
Writer makes few (or no) errors in grammar or spelling that do not affect the flow or ability to follow the pape
|
/ 10
Score of Grammar and Spelling (10 Points),
|
|
Core Values (10 Points) ECO.202.08: Explain the relevance of Responsible Stewardship in the context of microeconomic analysis. CPC.CV.05
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
7 points
Section Points Possible (less than 8 points)
Core value(s) implied but not specifically addressed in the writing.
|
8 points
Section Points Possible (8 points)
Core value(s) are specifically addressed, but do not address relevance and are not integrated throughout the paper.
|
9 points
Section Points Possible (9 points)
Core value(s) are specifically addressed with relevance stated, but not integrated throughout the paper.
|
10 points
Section Points Possible (10 points)
Core value(s) are specifically addressed with relevance stated, and are integrated throughout the paper.
|
/ 10
Score of Core Values (10 Points) ECO.202.08: Explain the relevance of Responsible Stewardship in the context of microeconomic analysis. CPC.CV.05,
|