11739 - 3 - Pages within 24 hrs

profileltdprinwival
Writing_Assignment_2.docx

Supermax prisons are a relatively new and expensive trend whose overall constitutionality is unclear. Are these institutions a fad or a wise investment?

For your second writing assignment, you will watch three videos. The first, "Solitary," will give you a firsthand account of life in solitary confinement in Red Onion State Prison in Virginia. Please do not skip this video. The second, "Supermax: A Prison Within a Prison," ABC News anchor, Ted Koppel, introduces you to life in a supermax prison in Texas. In the third, "Supermax: Prison Gangs and Racism Behind Bars," Ted Koppel talks with prisoners doomed to solitary confinement due to their gang affiliations. They discuss the dangers that drove them to join—and that keep them looking over their shoulders even in the so-called protective environment of a supermax prison. Mr. Koppel spends a night in solitary confinement to observe firsthand the effects of supermax on inmates—and to document the type of ex-convict who will one day be returned to society: racially intolerant, unrehabilitated, and psychologically and emotionally broken. (These videos are dated, but still very useful).

Here are some questions to think about as you watch the two videos:

1. What is a supermax prison?

2. What is the purpose of a supermax prison?

3. Who should be sent to a supermax prison?

4. What effect do you think a supermax prison would have on the staff who work there?  What's a "correctional cocktail"?

5. Would you want to work as a corrections officer in a supermax institution?

With what you now know about supermax prisons, answer the following questions: Do you think supermax facilities are a fad or a wise investment? It is worthwhile to pay the price for supermax confinement, no matter what it cost? Why or why not? What are the consequences of a supermax prison? Is there evidence to suggest that supermax prisons get inmates to modify their behavior so that they feel they do not need to resort to violence? Can we change offending behavior by locking people up in cages?

Please ground your discussion of these issues with the textbook, class lectures, and videos. I do not expect you to list an answer to each of the questions presented, but I expect you to draw connections between these videos and class material.

Grades will be based on the following criteria: a) critical thinking; b) integration of materials; and c) grammar & mechanics. Please re-visit the writing assignment rubric on Canvas before turning in this assignment.

This writing assignment should be 3 full pages. Use Times New Roman 12 point font, double spacing, and 1 inch margins.

Late assignments will not be accepted. Please do not ask for exceptions.

References:

If you are wondering how to cite the videos for your second writing assignment, please see below.

Jacobson, K. (Director). (2016). Solitary [Video file]. Retrieved (date)

Koppel, T. (1998a). A prison within a prison [Video file]. Retrieved (date)

Koppel, T. (1998b). Racism behind bars [Video file]. Retrieved (date)

158605920004/04/202011:00pm

· File Upload

· Google Drive

· Atomic Learning LTI

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Rubric

 

 

 

 

 

56133

 

     

Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  

Find a Rubric

Title: Find Rubric

Writing Assignment

You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

Writing Assignment

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics or writing (spelling, punctuation, grammar, clarity or prose) rubric_22_crit_1

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Level 4

Clear, readable, prose. Good use of transitions; no problems with spelling, punctuation, or grammar.

rubric_22_crit_1_377914

Edit rating Delete rating

8.0 to >4.0 pts

Level 3

Frequent problems with mechanics of language; Occasional awkward sentences and poor transitions; reduce readability

rubric_22_crit_1_377915

Edit rating Delete rating

4.0 to >0.0 pts

Level 2

Major problems with mechanics of language; Awkward sentence structure construction; Poor or absent transitions; Frequently difficult to understand

rubric_22_crit_1_377916

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Level 1

------

rubric_22_crit_1_377917

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 10.0 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and logic of answer rubric_22_crit_2

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Level 4

Clear and logical presentation; good development of an argument; Transitions are made clearly and smoothly

rubric_22_crit_2_377914

Edit rating Delete rating

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Level 3

Minor problems or organization or logic; Needs work on creating transitions between ideas

rubric_22_crit_2_377915

Edit rating Delete rating

2.0 to >0.0 pts

Level 2

Weak organization; sentences rambling; ideas are repeated

rubric_22_crit_2_377916

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Level 1

------

rubric_22_crit_2_377917

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 5.0 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates knowledge of readings rubric_22_crit_3

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Level 4

The essay makes reference to the readings and/or supporting materials. Student paraphrases majority of the information.

rubric_22_crit_3_377914

Edit rating Delete rating

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Level 3

The essay makes reference to the readings and/or supporting materials. Student uses direct quotes for majority of the information.

rubric_22_crit_3_377915

Edit rating Delete rating

2.0 to >0.0 pts

Level 2

The essay makes reference to the readings and/or supporting materials, but not all information.

rubric_22_crit_3_377916

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Level 1

The essay does not make reference to the readings and/or supporting materials.

rubric_22_crit_3_377917

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 5.0 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance of answer to the question rubric_22_crit_5

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Level 4

Answer is complete; sufficient detail provided to support assertions; answer focuses only on issues related to the question; factually correct

rubric_22_crit_5_377914

Edit rating Delete rating

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Level 3

Answer is brief with insufficient detail. Unrelated issues were introduced and/or minor errors in content.

rubric_22_crit_5_377915

Edit rating Delete rating

2.0 to >0.0 pts

Level 2

Answer is incomplete. Excessive discussion of unrelated issues and/or insignificant errors in content

rubric_22_crit_5_377916

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Level 1

The essay did not answer the question.

rubric_22_crit_5_377917

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 5.0 pts

--

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

view longer description

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5to >0 pts

Full Marks

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

0to >0 pts

No Marks

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

  / 5 pts

--

Additional Comments

Total Points: 25.0

MZInYlEw757ypc0

online_upload

Writing As

10.0

5.0

?

5