world cultures

pucho99

worldcultureassignmentmodule2.docx

Home >Psychology homework help >world cultures

Compare Leadership (Investigation)

Instructions:

1. Use the database of AGMU’s virtual library and learn about Augustus’ style in terms of administration.

· How was he able to control the empire?

· Why did the senate ask him to become emperor?

· How did he use his skills to create what has been called Pax Romana?

2. Research your local or national government. Ask the same questions about a politician alive now at the time of your research.

3. Compare both leaders in an infographic.

Be sure to review the academic expectations for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

· Your final infographic should have between 150 words. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

· Use your own words in most of the work. You could use direct quotes, but make sure that most of the writing is your own.

Rubric

- Official Graphic Organizer Rubric

- Official Graphic Organizer Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional

Application of Concepts

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The graphic organizer demonstrates an excellent mastery of the information requested to be analyzed

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

As clearly described by the graphic organizer, the student demonstrates good mastery of the information requested to be analyzed.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

As clearly described by the graphic organizer, the student demonstrates a fair and developing mastery of the information requested to be analyzed.

21 to >18.0 pts

Poor

The graphic organizer reveals a deficient mastery of the information requested to be analyzed.

18 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The graphic organizer did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication

Graphic and Visual Representation of Ideas

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The graphic organizer is adequate in size, style, and presents a clear thought process or analysis. The graphic stands alone and needs no additional explanations.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The graphic organizer is adequate in size, style, and presents a clear thought process or analysis. The graphic needs one or two additional details to be clear.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

The graphic organizer is adequate in size, style, and presents a clear thought process or analysis. The graphic needs three or four additional details to be clear.

21 to >18.0 pts

Poor

The graphic organizer presented is missing key elements and is approaching proficiency in the analysis or concept.

18 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The graphic organizer did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning

Analysis of information

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

All basic and complex details are considered and identification of the situation, problem, diagnosis, hierarchical alignments, comparisons, are made accurately and introduced properly in the organizer. The analysis and thought process are flawless and clear.

18 to >16.0 pts

Good

Most details are considered and identification of the situation, problem, diagnosis, hierarchical alignments, comparisons, are made accurately and identified in the organizer. The analysis and thought process is strong. Includes basic and complex details.

16 to >14.0 pts

Fair

Some details are considered and identification of the situation problem or diagnosis is made. Some of the parameters may not have been included in the organizer.

14 to >12.0 pts

Poor

Limited details are considered. Some of the parameters may not be incorporated into the organizer.

12 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The graphic organizer did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Use of Information

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Supporting information (if required) is pertinent to the discussion topic and all sources are recognized or cited properly. Full credit is given if no sources are required.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Supporting information (if required) is pertinent to the discussion topic but there are some issues with the sources or their citations.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Supporting information (if required) is unrelated to the topic.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

No supporting information, if required, or not submitted.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The graphic organizer did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Writing is entirely free of typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, translation or formatting errors.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Minimal (1 - 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

Severe (8 - 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100