MKTG 3130 Week 4
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 1 of 11
Sales and Customer Relations Management – Week 4
Evaluating Your Position in a Sale:
Red Flags – Leveraging Strengths – Buyer Response Modes
Selling can be a bit like investing in the stock market. If you are lacking a
strategy, then your expectations for making a gain can swing like a
pendulum from wild optimism to deep pessimism. Your emotions will cloud
your judgement and keep you from forming an objective assessment of
potential outcomes. Even worse, you’ll be unlikely to see the true gaps in
your competitive position or, conversely the opportunities to leverage
unique advantages.
The remedy for this ailment is to have a strategy that’s well informed by
facts. Effective information gathering is the key to making an informed
assessment of your true position for a sales opportunity. Any gaps in your
view of the customer’s decision dynamics – such as not knowing all the
decision makers, not understanding buying motivations, not knowing which
of your product’s features and benefits will most impact the customer - will
reduce your chances of making the sale.
The Strategic Selling framework provides an organized method for
identifying dangerous gaps in knowledge (Red Flags) as well as valuable
differentiators (Strengths to Leverage) in order to improve your competitive
position.
Red Flags
The symbolism of a Red Flag highlights critical information that’s missing or
unclear about your Single Sales Objective. Red Flags are not “negatives”.
Image of a
Red Flag
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 2 of 11
In fact the symbolism of a red flag is akin to the situation of a driver on a
winding mountain road. As he comes around a corner, he sees a road
worker holding a red caution flag. The driver is grateful for the advance
warning about an impending road hazard. He drives ahead with heightened
vigilance. As a sales rep, your clear eyed assessment of knowledge gaps
or other shortcomings is the first step in acting to remove any obstacles to
making the sale. Examples of Red Flags are:
New, or as yet un-contacted Buying Influences – if you haven’t
identified or met all key buying influences yet then the probability of
making a sale remains uncertain.
Reorganization, transformation, corporate action – any organizational
or structural changes in the midst of a customer’s purchase
assessment will require you to redefine the buying group and roles.
Uncertainty about other key informational aspects
Emerging competitor – has a new rival come on the scene?
Technology shifts, compatibility issues – has a change in IT standards caused your product to be considered non-compliant
Mandates for standardization – has a corporate standard been established that all business units must recognize?
Any of these developments should prompt an aggressive information
gathering effort to determine if your position has been weakened in any
way. This is where having developed an internal Coach can be very helpful
advantage in clarifying your position, countering any weaknesses and
removing Red Flags.
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 3 of 11
Strengths to Leverage
Companies are always striving to establish aspects of differentiation related
to their product features and benefits or their service delivery.
Differentiation helps thin the ranks of competitors and minimize price
competition. Differentiated advantages can be derived from the following:
Superior technology
Ease of use
Low overall cost of ownership
Patents
Compatibility with industry standards
Use these advantages to improve your position by highlighting the
benefits to decision makers and stressing that they are unique to your
product/company.
But…to be considered a Strength, it must be relevant to the current
sales objective. It must be something this customer cares about.
True Strengths tend to lessen price sensitivity. If customers are
convinced of the benefits, and that they are unique to your product
and company then price comparisons with your competitors become
of secondary importance.
Harder for customers to make apples-to-apples comparisons
Image of
Barbells
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 4 of 11
Competition
Well…what about the competition? Where do they fit into the Strategic
Selling framework? One thing is for sure – you never want to let the
competition set the agenda. You need a proactive competitive strategy
You set the agenda and the standards for comparison
You have the inside intelligence on how key decision makers feel
about change (growth vs trouble)
You have the edge in delivering corporate benefits that matter to
the customer (Results) and personal benefits to buying influences
that matter (Wins)
Make a credible case for your superior contribution
Convince the customer that what you have to bring to the table is
totally unique and of high value
Not just product features and functions
Anticipate tricky situations
Competitor is entrenched – patience, hard work needed to
broaden your contacts, find a weakness in their coverage of
customer’s needs
You’re the high-priced supplier – emphasize perception of value
and higher resulting ROI
Customer simply wants a competitive bid – absent the insights of
the strategic selling approach – it sets you up for a Lose/Lose
Competition Comes From Four Sources
People tend to think too narrowly about their competition. Sure, there are
companies that sell similar products and face off against you on a regular
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 5 of 11
basis. But think about the full range of alternatives to a customer
purchasing from you:
1. Buying from someone else – the traditional definition
2. Internally sourced solution – a make vs. buy decision that favors using
internal resources and options
3. Reallocate funds to another priority – you were investment opportunity
“A”…they chose option “B”. You still lose.
4. Do nothing…defer…cancel the project – this can be avoided by making
a more convincing case for your product as an investment with a
credible ROI. Get the customer to think in terms of “investment” rather
than “expense”
Single Sales Objective
It’s important to have a well-defined objective when you apply the
framework of Strategic Selling. There are many business purposes to
engage with customers, but this process is specifically designed to
shorten the sales cycle and achieve a specific economic transaction.
It’s product, service or solution-related, clear and concise.
It’s measurable, and tied to a timeline
All four of these customer options will compete with your solution
Define your total contribution to their business – not just your products and features
Define your relationship on a higher plane – as a joint venture vs. simply a vendor arrangement
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 6 of 11
Here’s an example of a Single Sales Objective
Response Modes – Buyer Reaction to Change
Image of Four Growth Modes G=Growth, T=Trouble, EK = Even Keel and OC =
Overconfident
Often, key decision makers aren’t aligned on the reason for a purchase.
Sales reps need to probe extensively to understand each player’s frame of
mind. There are four general categories of response mode:
Growth – a gap is perceived between what the buyer’s organization
is currently achieving and what they could achieve with the right
investment. Buyers with this mindset will be responsive if your
proposal is convincing on improvement.
Trouble – buyer needs help. A gap is perceived between where they
are now and where they feel they should be. They will welcome
credible proposals to remove problem areas.
To sell Mentor Graphics PCB Division a new network intrusion detection
product to reduce their hacking risk for $450,000 by March 2016
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 7 of 11
Even Keel – they are satisfied with status quo. This is a tough nut to
crack, but if you are skillful at “problem finding” then you may be able
to convince them of a growth or problem gap.
Overconfident – totally unreceptive to change. This is the toughest
of all. One or more buying influences have an unrealistically positive
perception of where they are now. May not be worth your time – until
events prove them wrong.
Summary of the four Response Modes linked to associated attitudes:
Response mode Probability of taking action
Buyer question
Growth (G) High Does your proposal reduce obstacles to exploiting an opportunity?
Trouble (T) High Does your proposal help fix my problem?
Even Keel (EK) Low Why do I need to make a change?
Overconfident (OC) Nil Who needs your proposal…I don’t!
Points to ponder… • What if some decision makers are concerned about “trouble”
but others are “even keel” and not desirous of changing the status quo?
• What buyer perception is the most powerful in driving change – “growth” or “trouble”?
• Think of some of your own recent purchase situations. What motivated you to part with your hard-earned money? Or if you didn’t pull the trigger – why not? Did a sales person play a role either way?
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 8 of 11
Remember, reality is defined by the Buying Influence’s Perception of the
selling situation…not yours. Your perception that “the glass is half empty”
may be at odds with the customer’s response mode “…it’s half full”. Trying
to convince a customer with an Even Keel response mode that they have
Trouble on their hands can be challenging, and even alienate you from the
customer. They may feel that your admonitions are self-serving – that you
are simply making up issues to help sell your product.
Rating the Buying Influences’ Attitude to Your Offering
Once you know how each Buying Influence feels about change and about
making a purchase (i.e. their Response Modes), you then need to look in
the mirror, and ask “how do they feel about my proposal?” They might be
enthusiastic about making an investment (Growth Response Mode) but be
less than thrilled about your solution. Using the four graphic symbols below,
you can assess the attitude of each Buying Influence towards your
company’s proposal.
Images for a buyer’s four general attitudes about your proposal – Enthusiastic,
Interested, Negative or Antagonistic
Below is a continuum of ratings starting with +5 (Enthusiastic Advocate)
and ending with -5 (Antagonistic Anti-sponsor). As you evaluate each key
decision maker using this scale, it forces you to be disciplined about where
your position with one of these players may need additional focus.
For instance, if you rate the Technical Buying Influence a -3 then you have
a Red Flag to deal with. As we know from last week’s discussion, Technical
Buyers can veto or rule out a supplier based on specification or compliance
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 9 of 11
deficiencies. Better get busy and educate him/her about your product’s
technical specifications before it’s too late!
Image showing the range of a buyer’s receptivity to your proposal ranging from
Enthusiastic (+5) to Antagonistic (-5), with symbols for strength (barbells) at the
top of the range and for issues to resolve (red flags) at the bottom.
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 10 of 11
So…once you’ve identified each Buying Influence on their degree of
influence (High-Medium-Low), and their Response Mode (Growth-Trouble-
Even Keel-Overconfident), you can add your Rating of their Attitude
towards your proposal (+5 to -5) and you’ll have a complete picture of your
position with each player as shown below:
Buying Influence
Degree of Influence
Response Mode
Attitude Rating
Economic H EK -2
User H T +3
Technical L T -3
Coach L G +4
Table showing categorization for each Buying Influence for three key
variables – Degree of Influence, Response Mode and Attitude Rating
How would you assess the situation above? Who is the most influential?
Are they leaning towards change …likely to make a purchase decision?
Are they favorably disposed to your proposal? Hopefully you can
appreciate that a multidimensional assessment like this helps to surface
Red Flags, and helps point the way to actions that are appropriate for each
gap in your position that needs resolution.
As the old saying goes…hope is not a strategy. Only a clear eyed objective
assessment of your position with a prospective buyer will ensure that you
have the time and knowledge to cover all the bases and ultimately achieve
a superior competitive position that will get you the sale.
UMASS Lowell Sales and Customer Relations Management
Week 4
Page 11 of 11
Next week we will cover two fundamental aspects of success in business-
to-business selling.
- The Importance of Winning – this relates not to your success, but
rather to uncovering and delivering “Wins” to the key customer
decision makers. Wins are personal, so close engagement with each
Buying Influence is necessary to identify what personal Win would
matter to each of them.
- Delivering Results – at its most elemental, every B2B proposal has
to show a customer how they will achieve either lower cost or
increased revenue from buying your product. Results are corporate.
They are tangible, measurable and often articulated in terms of return
on investment or payback period.