econ case study 2

Unacceptable Below 70% F

Fair 70-79% C

Proficient 80-89% B

Exemplary 90-100% A

1. Evaluate a company’s recent (with in the last year) actions dealing with risk and uncertainty.

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 21.68 (6.99%)

Did not submit or did not address the subject.

Points Range: 21.7 (7%) - 24.78 (7.99%)

Partially evaluated a company’s recent (within the last year) actions dealing with risk and uncertainty. Offered advice for improving risk management.

Points Range: 24.8 (8%) - 27.88 (8.99%)

Satisfactorily evaluated a company’s recent (within the last year) actions dealing with risk and uncertainty. Offered advice for improving risk management.

Points Range: 27.9 (9%) - 31 (10%)

Thoroughly evaluated a company’s recent (within the last year) actions dealing with risk and uncertainty. Offered advice for improving risk management.

2 Offer advice for improving risk management.

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 32.52 (10.49%)

Did not submit or did not address the subject.

Points Range: 32.55 (10.5%) - 37.17 (11.99%)

Partially offered advice for improving risk management.

Points Range: 37.2 (12%) - 41.82 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily offered advice for improving risk management

Points Range: 41.85 (13.5%) - 46.5 (15%)

Thoroughly offered advice for improving risk management

3. Examine an adverse selection problem your company is facing and recommend how it should minimize its negative impact on transactions.

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 32.52 (10.49%)

Did not submit or did not address the subject.

Points Range: 32.55 (10.5%) - 37.17 (11.99%)

Partially examined an adverse selection problem your company is facing and recommended how it should minimize its negative impact on transactions.

Points Range: 37.2 (12%) - 41.82 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily examined an adverse selection problem your company is facing and recommended how it should minimize its negative impact on transactions.

Points Range: 41.85 (13.5%) - 46.5 (15%)

Thoroughly examined an adverse selection problem your company is facing and recommended how it should minimize its negative impact on transactions.

4. Determine the ways your company is dealing with the moral hazard problem and suggest best practices used in the industry to deal with it.

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 32.52 (10.49%)

Did not submit or did not address the subject.

Points Range: 32.55 (10.5%) - 37.17 (11.99%)

Partially determined the ways your company is dealing with the moral hazard problem and suggested best practices used in the industry to deal with it.

Points Range: 37.2 (12%) - 41.82 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily determined the ways your company is dealing with the moral hazard problem and suggested best practices used in the industry to deal with it.

Points Range: 41.85 (13.5%) - 46.5 (15%)

Thoroughly determined the ways your company is dealing with the moral hazard problem and suggested best practices used in the industry to deal with it.

5. Identify a principal-agent problem in your company and evaluate the tools it uses to align incentives and improve profitability.

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 32.52 (10.49%)

Did not submit or did not address the subject.

Points Range: 32.55 (10.5%) - 37.17 (11.99%)

Partially identified a principal-agent problem in your company and evaluated the tools it uses to align incentives and improve profitability.

Points Range: 37.2 (12%) - 41.82 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily identified a principal-agent problem in your company and evaluated the tools it uses to align incentives and improve profitability.

Points Range: 41.85 (13.5%) - 46.5 (15%)

Thoroughly identified a principal-agent problem in your company and evaluated the tools it uses to align incentives and improve profitability.

6. Examine the organizational structure of your company and suggests ways it can be changed to improve the overall profitability.

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 43.36 (13.99%)

Did not submit or did not address the subject.

Points Range: 43.4 (14%) - 49.56 (15.99%)

Partially examined the organizational structure of your company and suggested ways it can be changed to improve the overall profitability.

Points Range: 49.6 (16%) - 55.76 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily examined the organizational structure of your company and suggested ways it can be changed to improve the overall profitability.

Points Range: 55.8 (18%) - 62 (20%)

Thoroughly examined the organizational structure of your company and suggested ways it can be changed to improve the overall profitability.

7. Use of at least 5 academic quality references, and one that has been published in the last 6 months.

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10.84 (3.5%)

Did not submit or did not include citations or references in work.

Points Range: 10.85 (3.5%) - 12.39 (4%)

Used enough references; however, not all were of academic quality, and one has been published in the last 6 months.

Points Range: 12.4 (4%) - 13.94 (4.5%)

Did not use enough references; however, all were of high quality and citations/references were appropriately done, and one has been published in the last 6 months.

Points Range: 13.95 (4.5%) - 15.5 (5%)

Used 5 or more academic quality references and citations were appropriately done, and one has been published in the last 6 months.

8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10.84 (3.5%)

Student did not submit the assignment or there are so many errors that work is confusing to read. APA citation not attempted.

Points Range: 10.85 (3.5%) - 12.39 (4%)

Several errors (5-6) in grammar, formatting and APA citation.

Points Range: 12.4 (4%) - 13.94 (4.5%)

A few errors (3–4) in grammar, formatting, and APA citation, but not so much that the reader is confused.

Points Range: 13.95 (4.5%) - 15.5 (5%)