HIT Evaluation Plan - Cost Analysis

profilemshp
WK8Assignment-2Rubric.pdf

2/24/22, 12:50 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920718_1 1/4

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Select a cost analysis for use in your HIT Evaluation Plan Project and justify your choice.

In a 2- to 3-page paper:

Choose one of the �ve main types of analysis Herasevich lists as appropriate for HIT and describe how you might use it to perform an analysis of a �nancial aspect of your chosen case.

32 (32%) - 35 (35%)

The response clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail describes the type of analysis selected and describes how it may be used to perform an analysis of a �nancial aspect of the chosen case.

28 (28%) - 31 (31%)

The response describes the type of analysis selected and describes how it may be used to perform an analysis of a �nancial aspect of the chosen case.

24 (24%) - 27 (27%)

The response describes in a vague or inaccurate manner the type of analysis selected and/or a description of how it may be used to perform an analysis of a �nancial aspect of the chosen case.

0 (0%) - 23 (23%)

The response describes in a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete manner the type of analysis selected and/or a description of how it may be used to perform an analysis of a �nancial aspect of the chosen case.

Name: NURS_6541_Week8_Assignment2_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

2/24/22, 12:50 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920718_1 2/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Describe the key elements you would include in your analysis.

23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

The response clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail describes the elements to include in the analysis.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

The response describes the elements to include in the analysis.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response describes the elements to include in the analysis in a vague or inaccurate manner.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%)

The response describes the elements to include in the analysis in a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete manner.

Justify your choice and provide a brief explanation of the alternative types of analysis. Explain why each would not be useful to analyze the �nancial aspect of your chosen case.

23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

The response clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail justi�es the choice with a clear explanation of the choice and the alternatives.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

The response justi�es the choice with an explanation of the choice and the alternatives.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response vaguely justi�es the choice with an incomplete or inaccurate explanation of the choice and the alternatives.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%)

The response vaguely and/or weakly justi�es the choice with an incomplete, inaccurate, or missing explanation of the choice and the alternatives.

2/24/22, 12:50 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920718_1 3/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Written Expression and Formatting — Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or o� topic.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

Written Expression and Formatting — English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

2/24/22, 12:50 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920718_1 4/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Written Expression and Formatting — The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6541_Week8_Assignment2_Rubric

EXIT