Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Evaluation Table
|
Full citation of selected article |
Article #1 |
Article #2 |
Article #3 |
Article #4 |
|
|
Melnyk, B. M. (2018). Arcc: An Evidence-Based System-Wide Model for Implementation and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practice. |
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: part I. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47-52. |
Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202-207. |
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence Part III. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43-51. |
|
Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study
|
This study aimed at implementing the ARCC Model to implement and sustain the use of evidence-based practices in healthcare.
|
This study used a step-by-step approach to provide guidelines on the effective implementation of EBP in the healing contexts. |
This study used the Grounded theory to develop new categories and integrate them into the data. |
This study used a step-by-step approach to provide guidelines on the effective implementation of EBP in the healing contexts. |
|
Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out
|
This article used multiple studies to support the ARCC Model. These resources used descriptive correlational, psychometric, randomized controlled and quasi-experimental designs. |
This study used the qualitative methods to conduct a critical appraisal of evidence |
The article used a qualitative design to explore different concepts and experiences. |
This study used the qualitative methods to conduct a critical appraisal of evidence |
|
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc. |
The resources used in the article had different sample sizes that mainly consisted of nurses.
|
The study did not have a definitive sample but it focused mainly on nurses. |
This article used a sample size of about 50 participants that mainly consisted of nurses. |
The study did not have a definitive sample but it focused mainly on nurses. |
|
Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables |
Independent: ARCC Model Dependent: EBP care |
Independent: Evidence-based practice Dependent: Nursing profession |
Independent: Evidence-based practice Dependent: Qualitative evidence |
Independent: Evidence-based practice Dependent: Nursing profession |
|
Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions |
Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practice |
Critical appraisal of the evidence |
Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence |
Critical appraisal of the evidence |
|
Data Analysis Statistical or qualitative findings |
Qualitative findings |
Qualitative findings |
Qualitative findings |
Qualitative findings |
|
Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research |
Implementing the ARCC Model helps to improve overall quality of care. |
Nurses require adequate knowledge and skills for consistent implementation of EBP. |
Critical appraisal helps to determine the reliability, validity, and usefulness of healing approaches. |
Nurses should create environments of care and supportive organizational culture to improve patient outcomes. |
|
Appraisal Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice? |
The appraisal shows that the article provides substantial evidence and models that would improve nursing practice. |
The appraisal shows that the article provides effective guidelines for implementing EBP in nursing. |
The appraisal shows that the article provides effective guidelines for critical appraisal of qualitative evidence in nursing. |
The appraisal shows that the article provides effective guidelines for implementing EBP in nursing. |
|
General Notes/Comments |
Nurses should use the article as a source of reference
|
The document provides crucial guidelines for improving patient care |
The article would help physicians to evaluate and understand research evidence. |
Nurses should borrow the conceptual and practical guidelines from the study to improve their practice. |
Levels of Evidence Table
|
Author and year of selected article |
Article #1 |
Article #2 |
Article #3 |
Article #4 |
|
|
Melnyk, B. M. (2018). Arcc: An Evidence-Based System-Wide Model for Implementation and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practice. |
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: part I. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47-52. |
Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202-207. |
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence Part III. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43-51. |
|
Study Design Theoretical basis for the study
|
ARCC Model
|
A step-by-step approach |
Grounded theory |
A step-by-step approach |
|
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients |
The article used different sample sizes that mainly consisted of nurses.
|
The study did not have a definitive sample but it focused mainly on nurses. |
This article used a sample size of about 50 participants that mainly consisted of nurses. |
The study did not have a definitive sample but it focused mainly on nurses. |
|
Evidence Level * (I, II, or III)
|
Level II |
Level IV |
Level III |
Level IV |
|
Outcomes
|
Improvement in overall quality of care. |
Development of adequate knowledge and skills for consistent implementation of EBP. |
Improved skills to determine the reliability, validity, and usefulness of healing approaches. |
Development of adequate knowledge and skills for consistent implementation of EBP. |
|
General Notes/Comments |
ARCC Model is sufficient for improving the quality of care
|
Systematic guidelines would help to improve knowledge and skill for implementing EBP |
Grounded theory would help in comprehensive evaluation of different healing approaches. |
Systematic guidelines would help to improve knowledge and skill for implementing EBP |
Outcomes Synthesis Table
|
Author and year of selected article |
Article #1 |
Article #2 |
Article #3 |
Article #4 |
|
|
Melnyk, B. M. (2018). Arcc: An Evidence-Based System-Wide Model for Implementation and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practice. |
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: part I. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47-52. |
Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202-207. |
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence Part III. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43-51. |
|
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients |
The article used different sample sizes that mainly consisted of nurses. |
The study did not have a definitive sample but it focused mainly on nurses. |
This article used a sample size of about 50 participants that mainly consisted of nurses. |
The study did not have a definitive sample but it focused mainly on nurses. |
|
Outcomes
|
Improvement in overall quality of care. |
Development of adequate knowledge and skills for consistent implementation of EBP. |
Improved skills to determine the reliability, validity, and usefulness of healing approaches. |
Development of adequate knowledge and skills for consistent implementation of EBP. |
|
Key Findings
|
EBP environments help to provide support, encouragement, , and sustainable care systems |
Observation of systematic guidelines would help in efficient implementation of EBP |
Qualitative evidence provides physicians with advanced appraisal skills that influence improved patient outcomes. |
Observation of systematic guidelines would help in efficient implementation of EBP |
|
Appraisal and Study Quality
|
Appraisal and study are of sufficient quality |
Appraisal and study are of sufficient quality |
Appraisal and study are of sufficient quality |
Appraisal and study are of sufficient quality |
|
General Notes/Comments |
The article provides crucial information about the implementation of EBP
|
Study gives crucial guidelines for implementing EBP in healthcare |
Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence helps improve the quality of nursing practice |
Nurses should observe guidelines to eliminate issues when implementing EBP. |
© 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 1