Special Education Course

profiledestynska
wk6Rubric-ShowcaseofCommunityResources.pdf

Showcase of Community Resources - Rubric

General information: Grade band, Purpose, Rationale 7.5 points

Criteria Description

General information: Grade band, Purpose, Rationale

5. Target 7.5 points

General information about the event is exceptional and specific.

4. Acceptable 6.53 points

General information about the event is clear and detailed.

3. Approaching 5.55 points

General information about the event is vague or missing key details.

2. Insufficient 5.18 points

General information about the event is implausible or incomplete.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Outside Service Providers 15 points

Criteria Description

Outside Service Providers

5. Target 15 points

Outside service providers are ideal for the selected event.

4. Acceptable 13.05 points

Outside service providers are appropriate for the selected event.

3. Approaching 11.1 points

Outside service providers are generally relevant for the selected event.

2. Insufficient 10.35 points

Outside service providers are irrelevant for the selected event.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Local Department of Developmental Disabilities 15 points

Criteria Description

Local Department of Developmental Disabilities

5. Target 15 points

Description of services provided by the local department of developmental

disabilities is comprehensive.

4. Acceptable 13.05 points

Description of services provided by the local department of developmental

disabilities is appropriate for students.

3. Approaching 11.1 points

Description of services provided by the local department of developmental

disabilities includes only limited details.

2. Insufficient 10.35 points

Description of services provided by the local department of developmental

disabilities is incomplete or unrelated.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Transition Resources 15 points

Criteria Description

Transition Resources

5. Target 15 points

Transitional resources identified are exceptionally appropriate for students.

4. Acceptable 13.05 points

Transitional resources identified are appropriate for students.

3. Approaching 11.1 points

Transitional resources identified are underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient 10.35 points

Transitional resources identified are inappropriate for students.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Rationale 11.25 points

Criteria Description

Rationale

5. Target 11.25 points

Rationale for selection of service providers and transition resources is compelling.

Explanation of theories and elements of collaboration with outside service

providers and local department of developmental disabilities to provide helpful

resources and create a successful event is professional and specific.

4. Acceptable 9.79 points

Rationale for selection of service providers and transition resources is convincing.

Explanation of theories and elements of collaboration with outside service

providers and local department of developmental disabilities to provide helpful

resources and create a successful event is clear and complete.

3. Approaching 8.33 points

Rationale for selection of service providers and transition resources is shallow.

Explanation of theories and elements of collaboration with outside service

providers and local department of developmental disabilities to provide helpful

resources and create a successful event is unfocused.

2. Insufficient 7.76 points

Rationale for selection of service providers and transition resources is

unconvincing. Explanation of theories and elements of collaboration with outside

service providers and local department of developmental disabilities to provide

helpful resources and create a successful event is incomplete.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Organization 3.75 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 3.75 points

Maintains clear and obvious organizationDemonstrates effective paragraphing

using appropriate transitions with emphasis upon conveying the relationship

between ideas

4. Acceptable 3.26 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching 2.78 points

The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience

with a sense of the main idea.

2. Insufficient 2.59 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The

ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Layout 3.75 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Target 3.75 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings and white space. The presentation

includes images, graphics, and examples to enhance the slideshow’s visual interest.

Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The

background and colors enhance the readability of text. Notes are well written and

facilitate the delivery of the script in the presentation.

4. Acceptable 3.26 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to

be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for

headings and text.

3. Approaching 2.78 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting

with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is

difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy

background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

2. Insufficient 2.59 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with

long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors.

Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 3.75 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Target 3.75 points

Presentation is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-

developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are

varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 3.26 points

Presentation and speaker’s notes include some mechanical errors, but they do not

hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used.

3. Approaching 2.78 points

Presentation and speaker’s notes include frequent and repetitive mechanical errors

that distract the reader. Sentence structure is lacking.

2. Insufficient 2.59 points

Presentation and speaker’s notes include surface errors that are pervasive enough

that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate sentence construction

is used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Total 75 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.