POSITIVE SOCIAL CHANGE

NURS_8006_Week6_Blog2_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

Main Posting:  Idea and Content

24 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. Posts main blog by due date.

22 to >19.0 ptsGoodResponds to all of the blog prompt/s. Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. Posts main blog by due date.

19 to >16.0 ptsFairPartially responds to the blog prompt/s. Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. Posts main blog by due date.

16 to >0 ptsPoorDoes not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. Does not post main blog by due date.

24 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:

Post to colleague's main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.  NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.

13 to >12.0 ptsExcellentPresents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. Posts by due date.

12 to >11.0 ptsGoodPresents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. Posts by due date.

11 to >9.0 ptsFairPresents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. Posts by due date.

9 to >0 ptsPoorThe post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. Does not post by due date.

13 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:

Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

13 to >12.0 ptsExcellentPresents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. Posts by due date.

12 to >11.0 ptsGoodPresents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. Posts by due date.

11 to >9.0 ptsFairPresents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. Posts by due date.

9 to >0 ptsPoorResponse lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. Does not post by due date.

13 pts