WK 6 ASSIGN
Nursebeauty
WK6ASSIGN.docxLearning Resources
· Devi, D. H., Duraisamy, K., Armghan, A., Alsharari, M., Aliqab, K., Sorathiya, V., Das, S., & Rashid, N. (2023). 5G technology in healthcare and wearable devices: A reviewLinks to an external site.. Sensors (14248220) , 23 (5), 2519. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052519
· Raza, M. M., Venkatesh, K. P., & Kvedar, J. C. (2023). Promoting racial equity in Digital Health: Applying a cross-disciplinary equity frameworkLinks to an external site.. Npj Digital Medicine, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00747-5
· Yang, X., Wang, X., Li, X., Gu, D., Liang, C., Li, K., Zhang, G., & Zhong, J. (2020). Exploring emerging IoT technologies in smart health research: A knowledge graph analysisLinks to an external site.. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20 , 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01278-9
· Wu, M., & Luo, J. (2019). Wearable technology applications in healthcare: A literature review Links to an external site. . HIMSS. https://www.himss.org/resources/wearable-technology-applications-healthcare-literature-reviewLinks to an external site.
· Document: Sample Presentation Template (PowerPoint) Download Sample Presentation Template (PowerPoint)
· ZEBRA Technologies. (n.d.). The future of healthcare: 2022 Hospital vision study: Mobile technology elevates patient care, empowers clinicians and enhances workflows Links to an external site. . https://www.zebra.com/content/dam/zebra_new_ia/en-us/solutions-verticals/vertical-solutions/healthcare/white-paper/2022-hospital-vision-study-en-global.pdf
DeSigning a Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization
You will use project management tools and strategies to propose how you would support and potentially implement a nursing informatics project. While you may not have the opportunity to implement this proposed project, this project will allow you to apply the skills needed and the considerations that are required in deducing how a project of this scope might take place in your nursing practice. To complete this project, you will define a informatics project that would be beneficial to your healthcare organization or nursing practice. You can discuss this with upper leadership, in your practice or organization, explaining that you will need to design ia proposed informatics project.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
The Assignment: (10–11 SLIDES)
This week, you will finalize your proposed Informatics Project, using all work completed during Weeks 1–5. Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your presentation (APA 7).
· Introduction
· Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your nursing practice or healthcare organization. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter Documents.
· Conduct a SWOT analysis which will provide information for the Scope and Charter. You can use a Word document and insert a table. Directions can be viewed in the Week 3 media piece, How to Perform a SWOT Analysis , found in this week’s Learning Resources. Some of the content is relevant to both the project for this course as well as organization of your doctoral dissertation. Overall, the first step for any project, work or your dissertation, requires a plan: what you will and will not do. That information is defined in a charter and scope.
· Create a visual using the Gap Analysis map of the identified gap, documenting the flow from the point of origin to the destination. After watching the Week 3 media piece, How to do a GAP Analysis , identify the gap and analyze the flow or lack of flow of information as the gap in a process. The visual map will include the flow from the point of origin to the destination.
· Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) using PowerPoint slides or another method. Be sure to review the media piece, What Is a Work Breakdown Structure? in the Week 3 Learning Resources.
· Create a Project Timeline Gantt chart, which defines who is responsible, due dates to start /finish activities. You can find an example on pp. 95–96 of your text, using PowerPoint slides, or another method. Be sure to review the Gantt Charts, Simplified media piece in this week’s Learning Resources.
· RACI (responsibility chart) which outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, if working with a team. An example can be found in the Sipes text on pages 111–113.
· Communication plan – Include documentation of all communications, status reports, changes made, and next steps, especially if others will be responsible for helping you acquire documents such as IRB site documents if applicable. An example can be found in the Sipes text on pages 117–119 and on pages 152–154.
· Risk management plan– After viewing the “ Risk Analysis How to Analyze Risks on Your Project” media piece in this week's Learning Resources, document current and potential risks and how risks may be mitigated if possible. An example can be found in the Sipes text on pages 113–117.
· Rationale – Synthesize scholarly literature that supports your proposed project.
· Conclusion
Reminder: The Sample Presentation Template is found in Week 6 Learning Resources. All presentations submitted must use this formatting.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK6Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_8210_Week6_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_8210_Week6_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter documents. |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred.... An accurate and complete project scope document that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. ... An accurate and complete project charter document that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred. ... An accurate project scope document is provided with the submission. ... An accurate project charter document is provided with the submission. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred. ... An inaccurate or vague project scope document is provided with the submission. ... An inaccurate or vague project charter document is provided with the submission. 12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred, or it is missing. ... An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete project scope document is provided with the submission, or it is missing. ... An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete project charter document is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConduct a SWOT analysis which will provide information for the Scope and Charter. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your presentation (APA 7). |
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete SWOT analysis that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodAn accurate SWOT analysis is provided with the submission. 19 to >16.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague SWOT analysis is provided with the submission. 16 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete SWOT analysis is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
25 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a visual using the Gap Analysis map of the identified gap, documenting the flow from the point of origin to the destination. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your presentation (APA 7). |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete Gap Analysis that is detailed and comprehensive is provided in the submission. ... The response accurately and clearly indicates in detail the flow from the point of origin to the destination and fully supports the proposed small nursing informatics project. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodAn accurate Gap Analysis is provided with the submission. ... The response accurately indicates the flow from the point of origin to the destination and supports the proposed small nursing informatics project. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague Gap Analysis is provided with the submission. ... The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates the flow from the point of origin to the destination and may inaccurately or vaguely support the proposed small nursing informatics project. 12 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Gap Analysis is provided with the submission, or it is missing. ... The response inaccurately and vaguely indicates the flow from the point of origin to the destination that does not support the proposed small nursing informatics projects, or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your presentation (APA 7). |
15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate, complete, and detailed Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission. 12 to >9.0 ptsGoodAn accurate Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission. 9 to >6.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission. 6 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a Project Timeline Gantt chart, which defines who is responsible, due dates to start/finish activities. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your presentation (APA 7). |
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete Project Timeline Gantt chart that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. ... The response accurately and clearly identifies in detail who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodAn accurate Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission. ... The response accurately identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities. 19 to >15.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission. ... The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities. 15 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission, or it is missing. ... The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities, or it is missing. |
25 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a RACI (responsibility chart), which outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, if working on a team. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your presentation (APA 7). |
15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete responsibility chart that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. ... The responsibility chart accurately and clearly outlines who will be responsible for which tasks. 12 to >9.0 ptsGoodAn accurate responsibility chart is provided with the submission. ... The responsibility chart accurately outlines who will be responsible for which tasks. 9 to >6.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague responsibility chart is provided with the submission. ... The responsibility chart inaccurately or vaguely outlines who will be responsible for which tasks. 6 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete responsibility chart is provided with the submission, or it is missing. ... The responsibility chart inaccurately and vaguely outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, or it is missing. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a communication plan, including documentation of all communications, status reports, changes made, and next steps. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your presentation (APA 7). |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete communication plan that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodAn accurate communication plan is provided with the submission. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague communication plan is provided with the submission. 12 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague communication plan is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a risk management plan. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your presentation (APA 7). |
15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete risk management plan that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. 12 to >9.0 ptsGoodAn accurate risk management plan provided with the submission. 9 to >6.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague risk management plan is provided with the submission. 6 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete risk management plan is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport your rationale for this proposed project with current scholarly evidence (no older than 5 years). |
30 to >26.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete review of scholarly evidence that is detailed and comprehensive supporting the rationale for the proposed project. 26 to >22.0 ptsGoodAn accurate review of scholarly evidence that supports the rationale for the proposed project. 22 to >17.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague risk review of scholarly evidence is provided with the submission. 17 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete review of scholarly evidence is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
30 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Slides make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Text, bulleted lists, and visuals are carefully focused—neither overly detailed nor lacking substance. Slides are concise while incorporating all required criteria. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentSlides follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive introduction and conclusion are provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodSlides follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Introduction and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairSlides follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Introduction and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. 3 to >0 ptsPoorSlides follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No introduction or conclusion was provided. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Standard Academic English: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The presentation follows the required template and correct APA format for title slide, headings, fonts, spacing, margins, and numbering. In-text citations and reference slides are properly formatted. Uses the Walden template from learning resources. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format and writing template with no errors. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Uses writing template. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Uses writing template. 3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors or does not use writing template. |
5 pts |
Total Points: 200
