Week 11 project

profilejamiahr23
WK6Assgn1RiddickJ.extension.docx

Running Head: FACTORIAL ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

FACTORIAL ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

Jamiah Riddick

Walden University

RSCH - 8260F; Advanced Quantitative

Dr. Marker

July 12th, 2021

Factorial Analysis of Variance:

ANOVA (Factorial analysis of variance), being the statistical procedure, allows to investigate or determine the influence of independent variables (two or more) on the dependent variable. In this way, factorial ANOVA is regarded as the powerful test for exploring this interaction as it reduces the potential error variance. Therefore, factorial ANOVA deals with the comparison of different means between the groups which are split into independent variables (called factors). In regard, factorial ANOVA has been applied to see that whether there is any interaction between the gun owners, race, citizenship on the family income, where guns own (yes/no/refused), citizenship (yes/no), and race (white/black/other) are independent variables or factors, and family income is the dependent variable. Age has been excluded as it was not a categorical variable in the data set i.e., instead of age groups general continuous limits about age are mentioned. In this way, the factorial ANOVA is using the three independent variables (with two or more categories) for predicting the change in the dependent variable i.e., family income. Therefore, for factorial ANOVA or univariate variance analysis regarding the underpinned factors, the following assumptions must be held, in case of violations, the results or findings will not be validated. These assumptions are six and they are:

· Assumption 1: In the factorial ANOVA, the dependent variable is always a continuous variable i.e., measured at a continuous level.

· Assumption 2: In the factorial ANOVA, the independent variables are always categorical variables i.e., categorical predictor variables that consist of categories or independent groups.

· Assumption 3: In the factorial ANOVA, observations of each group are always independent of each other.

· Assumption 4: In the factorial ANOVA, there is no significant outliers i.e., the data points do not follow the usual pattern.

· Assumption 5: In the factorial ANOVA, the dependent variable is always normally distributed for the combination of the groups of independent variables.

· Assumption 6: In the factorial ANOVA, each combination of groups of the independent variables has homogenous variances.

The validation of assumptions 4, 5, and 6 can be analyzed only through the SPSS statistics while 1, 2, and 3 are not possible to check through the SPSS. Therefore, these assumptions are checked through the theory and are not violated in the case. Therefore, the factorial ANOVA based on the given hypothesis has been estimated by using the SPSS.

Based on the research question of the study, the hypothesis is:

Hypothesis:

HO: There is no interaction of citizenship, race, and gun ownership on family income.

H1: There is a significant interaction of citizenship, race, and gun ownership on family income.

Therefore, the results of the three categorical variables (factors) on the response variable through testing the hypothesis are given in the upcoming section of the conclusion.

Conclusion:

The results have been arrived at by using the social set database on SPSS. In this regard, the Univariate Analysis of Variance has is presented in appendices. The statistics in the concern are presented in appendix 1 regarding the between-subjects factors whose sample size is slightly different from the sample size before estimating the factorial analysis and the sample size changes because of factorial ANOVA. Based on the given table, the three factors i.e., citizenship, race, and gun ownership are presented along with their groups and their sample size are presented.

The descriptive statistics estimated through the ANOVA analysis is presented in appendix 02 (see appendices). These statistics are presenting the different means as compared to the observed means which are depicting clearly in marginal expected means appendices. Therefore, Levene’s test of equability of error variances is presenting that model is normally distributed and actors are significant (see appendix 03). Therefore, based on the mean approach not no assumption of equal variances was violated. Hence, the results of between-subjects effects in this regard are presented in appendix 04. These are the key results that postulate the statistics regarding the corrected model, intercept, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and three-way ANOVA. According to these statistics corrected model has a significant value of 0.008 while the partial Eta squared value is 0.130, additionally, the significant probability value for the intercept is 0.000 and the partial Eta Squared is 0.132. these statistics are depicting that the corrected model and the value of the intercept are highly significant. In the original models 1 and 2 (appendix 3 and 4), constant or intercept was also found highly significant. Moreover, in one-way factorial ANOVA the probability values of citizenship, race, and gun ownership are 0.74, 0.46, and 0.01, these values are representing the insignificant interaction with the family income other than the gun owners whose value is depicting the significant interaction with the family income. Furthermore, in the case of two-way ANOVA, it has found that citizenship and race have an insignificant interaction while there was no interaction found between citizenship and gun owners. Similarly, in two-way ANOVA it has also been found an insignificant interaction between race and gun ownership. In the way, the three-way ANOVA results postulate that there are no interactions found between citizenship, race, and gun ownership on the family income. Therefore, a null hypothesis is expected i.e., there is no interaction found between the factors and dependent variable. Moreover, the estimated marginal means of the given factors in one-way, two-way, and three-way factorial ANOVA are presented in appendix 5. The plot graph in this regard is presented below.

APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Univariate Analysis of Variance

Between-Subjects Factors

Value Label

N

ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA?

1

YES

143

2

NO

12

RACE OF RESPONDENT

1

WHITE

104

2

BLACK

26

3

OTHER

25

HAVE GUN IN HOME

1

YES

14

2

NO

139

3

REFUSED

2

Appendix 2: Descriptive Statistics

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA?

RACE OF RESPONDENT

HAVE GUN IN HOME

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

YES

WHITE

YES

99129.22

55911.545

13

NO

65581.50

52313.103

84

REFUSED

17920.75

21685.904

2

Total

69023.91

53749.903

99

BLACK

NO

41082.12

39977.686

22

Total

41082.12

39977.686

22

OTHER

YES

160742.22

.

1

NO

65236.66

57698.459

21

Total

69577.82

59876.440

22

Total

YES

103530.15

56185.282

14

NO

61280.49

51804.395

127

REFUSED

17920.75

21685.904

2

Total

64810.39

53512.069

143

NO

WHITE

NO

36432.70

36626.053

5

Total

36432.70

36626.053

5

BLACK

NO

22631.88

9614.695

4

Total

22631.88

9614.695

4

OTHER

NO

27404.58

16941.014

3

Total

27404.58

16941.014

3

Total

NO

29575.40

24604.682

12

Total

29575.40

24604.682

12

Total

WHITE

YES

99129.22

55911.545

13

NO

63943.93

51843.111

89

REFUSED

17920.75

21685.904

2

Total

67457.03

53385.261

104

BLACK

NO

38243.62

37412.304

26

Total

38243.62

37412.304

26

OTHER

YES

160742.22

.

1

NO

60507.65

55526.458

24

Total

64517.03

57936.173

25

Total

YES

103530.15

56185.282

14

NO

58543.36

50778.440

139

REFUSED

17920.75

21685.904

2

Total

62082.52

52658.348

155

Appendix 3: Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

df1

df2

Sig.

2.099

8

146

.039

Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.

a. Design: Intercept + citizen + race + owngun + citizen * race + citizen * owngun + race * owngun + citizen * race * owngun

Appendix 4: Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

Source

Type III Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Partial Eta Squared

Corrected Model

55538558582.154a

8

6942319822.769

2.728

.008

.130

Intercept

56352155100.249

1

56352155100.249

22.147

.000

.132

citizen

8216122291.620

1

8216122291.620

3.229

.074

.022

race

3898512396.712

2

1949256198.356

.766

.467

.010

owngun

21733302617.516

2

10866651308.758

4.271

.016

.055

citizen * race

568544245.832

2

284272122.916

.112

.894

.002

citizen * owngun

.000

0

.

.

.

.000

race * owngun

3377873954.877

1

3377873954.877

1.328

.251

.009

citizen * race * owngun

.000

0

.

.

.

.000

Error

371488293338.152

146

2544440365.330

Total

1024434003858.308

155

Corrected Total

427026851920.307

154

a. R Squared = .130 (Adjusted R Squared = .082)

Appendix 5: Estimated Marginal Means

1. Grand Mean

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

Mean

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

59573.514a

8800.002

42181.669

76965.360

a. Based on modified population marginal mean.

2. ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA?

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA?

Mean

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

YES

74948.745a

10902.979

53400.691

96496.800

NO

28823.053a

14881.551

-588.035

58234.141

a. Based on modified population marginal mean.

3. RACE OF RESPONDENT

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

RACE OF RESPONDENT

Mean

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

WHITE

54766.043a

11200.238

32630.501

76901.585

BLACK

31856.999a

13709.180

4762.921

58951.078

OTHER

84461.153a

19758.967

45410.605

123511.702

a. Based on modified population marginal mean.

4. HAVE GUN IN HOME

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

HAVE GUN IN HOME

Mean

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

YES

129935.718a

26173.300

78208.230

181663.206

NO

43061.574

7923.692

27401.620

58721.528

REFUSED

17920.750a

35668.196

-52571.934

88413.434

a. Based on modified population marginal mean.

5. ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA? * RACE OF RESPONDENT

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA?

RACE OF RESPONDENT

Mean

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

YES

WHITE

60877.157

12902.357

35377.640

86376.674

BLACK

41082.124a

10754.366

19827.780

62336.467

OTHER

112989.438a

25814.745

61970.580

164008.297

NO

WHITE

36432.700a

22558.548

-8150.788

81016.188

BLACK

22631.875a

25221.223

-27213.980

72477.730

OTHER

27404.583a

29122.960

-30152.452

84961.618

a. Based on modified population marginal mean.

6. ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA? * HAVE GUN IN HOME

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA?

HAVE GUN IN HOME

Mean

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

YES

YES

129935.718a

26173.300

78208.230

181663.206

NO

57300.095

5447.845

46533.270

68066.920

REFUSED

17920.750a

35668.196

-52571.934

88413.434

NO

YES

.b

.

.

.

NO

28823.053

14881.551

-588.035

58234.141

REFUSED

.b

.

.

.

a. Based on modified population marginal mean.

b. This level combination of factors is not observed, thus the corresponding population marginal mean is not estimable.

7. RACE OF RESPONDENT * HAVE GUN IN HOME

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

RACE OF RESPONDENT

HAVE GUN IN HOME

Mean

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

WHITE

YES

99129.218a

13990.217

71479.713

126778.724

NO

51007.101

11610.114

28061.502

73952.701

REFUSED

17920.750a

35668.196

-52571.934

88413.434

BLACK

YES

.b

.

.

.

NO

31856.999

13709.180

4762.921

58951.078

REFUSED

.b

.

.

.

OTHER

YES

160742.218a

50442.446

61050.509

260433.927

NO

46320.621

15566.877

15555.092

77086.151

REFUSED

.b

.

.

.

a. Based on modified population marginal mean.

b. This level combination of factors is not observed, thus the corresponding population marginal mean is not estimable.

8. ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA? * RACE OF RESPONDENT * HAVE GUN IN HOME

Dependent Variable: FAMILY INCOME IN CONSTANT DOLLARS

ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA?

RACE OF RESPONDENT

HAVE GUN IN HOME

Mean

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

YES

WHITE

YES

99129.218

13990.217

71479.713

126778.724

NO

65581.503

5503.722

54704.246

76458.760

REFUSED

17920.750

35668.196

-52571.934

88413.434

BLACK

YES

.a

.

.

.

NO

41082.124

10754.366

19827.780

62336.467

REFUSED

.a

.

.

.

OTHER

YES

160742.218

50442.446

61050.509

260433.927

NO

65236.659

11007.444

43482.145

86991.173

REFUSED

.a

.

.

.

NO

WHITE

YES

.a

.

.

.

NO

36432.700

22558.548

-8150.788

81016.188

REFUSED

.a

.

.

.

BLACK

YES

.a

.

.

.

NO

22631.875

25221.223

-27213.980

72477.730

REFUSED

.a

.

.

.

OTHER

YES

.a

.

.

.

NO

27404.583

29122.960

-30152.452

84961.618

REFUSED

.a

.

.

.

a. This level combination of factors is not observed, thus the corresponding population marginal mean is not estimable.