Criminal

profileBoston2019
WK6-BriefRubric_FLASHYFLASHERS-MRP1.docx

WEEK 6 BUSINESS BRIEF RUBRIC: FLASHY FLASHERS-MRP

Total of 75 points

Criteria

Unacceptable

Acceptable

Proficient

Student Score and Comments

Develops an opening paragraph that introduces the case and identifies the problem from

Step 1 of the 5-Step Critical Thinking Decision-Making Model.

Vaguely develops an opening paragraph that introduces the case and identifies the problem or does not have an opening paragraph.

(0-7 points)

Develops an opening paragraph that introduces the case and identifies the problem and, for the most part, fulfills assignment requirements.

(8 points)

Develops an opening paragraph that introduces the case and identifies the problem and demonstrates a solid ability to accomplish the assignment.

(9-10 points)

Performs a manual MRP explosion for the side lamps.

Step 2 of the 5-Step Critical Thinking Decision-Making Model.

Vaguely performs a manual MRP explosion for the side lamps or does not complete.

(0-11 points)

Performs a manual MRP explosion for the side lamps and, for the most part, fulfills assignment requirements.

(12-13 points)

Performs a manual MRP explosion for the side lamps and demonstrates a solid ability to accomplish the assignment.

(14-15 points)

Performs a manual MRP explosion for the headlamps.

Step 2 of the 5-Step Critical Thinking Decision-Making Model.

Vaguely performs a manual MRP explosion for the headlamps or does not complete.

(0-11 points)

Performs a manual MRP explosion for the headlamps and, for the most part, fulfills assignment requirements.

(12-13 points)

Performs a manual MRP explosion for the headlamps and demonstrates a solid ability to accomplish the assignment.

(14-15 points)

Discusses the positive and negative points of the MRP implementation at the company.

Step 2 of the 5-Step Critical Thinking Decision-Making Model.

Vaguely discusses the positive and negative points of the MRP implementation at the company or is completely off the topic.

(0-11 points)

Discusses the positive and negative points of the MRP implementation at the company and, for the most part, fulfills assignment requirements.

(12-13 points)

Discusses the positive and negative points of the MRP implementation at the company and demonstrates a solid ability to accomplish the assignment.

(14-15 points)

Recommends how to improve the resource planning process at the company.

Step 4 of the 5-Step Critical Thinking Decision-Making Model.

Vaguely recommends how to improve the resource planning process at the company or is completely off the topic.

(0 -7 points)

Recommends how to improve the resource planning process at the company and, for the most part, fulfills assignment requirements.

(8 points)

Recommends how to improve the resource planning process at the company and demonstrates a solid ability to accomplish the assignment.

(9-10 points)

Synthesizes relevant information and materials to provide evidence of critical thought.

Synthesizes information at a minimal level.

(0-7 points)

For the most part, effectively synthesizes information, which supports main ideas.

(8 points)

Consistently and effectively synthesizes information, which provides strong support to main ideas.

(9-10 points)

SubTotal Points

SafeAssign

Did not turn paper into SafeAssign.

Assignment – zero points

----

----

Revisions based on the Originality Report

Did not revise the paper based on the originality report.

Minus 25 points

----

----

Grammarly

Did not revise the paper based on Grammarly.

Minus 25 points

---

---

5-Step Critical Thinking Decision-Making Model

Did not complete and submit.

Minus 40 Points

Total Points =

WEEK 6 BUSINESS BRIEF RUBRIC:

FLASHY FLASHERS

-

MRP

Total

of

75

points

Criteria

Unacceptable

Acceptable

Proficient

Student Score and

Comments

Develops an

opening

paragraph that

introduces the

case

and

identifies the

problem from

Step 1 of the 5

-

Step

Critical Thinking

Decision

-

Making

Model.

V

aguely develops an

opening paragraph

that introduces the

case

and identifies

the problem

or does

not have an opening

paragraph.

(0

-

7

points)

D

evelops an opening

paragraph that

introduces the case

and

identifies t

he

problem and

, for the

most part, fulfills

assignment

requirements.

(

8

points)

D

evelops an opening

paragraph that

introduces the case

and identifies the

problem

and

demonstrates

a

solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(

9

-

10

points)

Performs a

manual MRP

explosion for the

side lamps.

Step

2

of the 5

-

Step

Critical Thinking

Decision

-

Making

Model.

V

aguely

performs a

manual MRP

explosion for the

side lamps

or

does

not complete.

(0

-

11

points)

P

erforms a manual

MRP explosion for

the

side lamps

and,

for the most part,

fulfills assignment

requirements.

(

12

-

13

points)

P

erforms a manual

MRP explosion for

the

side lamps

and

demonstrates

a

solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(

14

-

15

points)

Performs a

manual MRP

explosion for the

head

lamps

.

Step

2

of the 5

-

Step

Critical Thinking

Decision

-

Making

Model.

V

aguely

performs a

manual MRP

explosion for the

head

lamps

or

does

not complete.

(0

-

11

points)

P

erforms a manual

MRP explosion for

the

head

lamps

and,

for the most part,

fulfills

assignment

requirements.

(

12

-

13

points)

P

erforms

a manual

MRP explosion for

the head

lamps

and

demonstrates

a

solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(

14

-

15

points)

Discusses the

positive and

negative

points

of the MRP

implementation

at the company.

Step

2

of the 5

-

Step

Critical Thinking

Decision

-

Making

Model.

V

aguely discusses

the

positive and

negative

points of

the MRP

implementation at

the company or

is

completely off the

topic.

(0

-

11

points)

D

iscusses the

positive and negative

points of the MRP

implementation at

the company and, for

the most part, fulfills

assignment

requirements.

(

12

-

13

points)

D

iscusses the

positive and negative

points of the MRP

implementation at

the company and

demonstrates

a

solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(

14

-

15

points)

Recommends

how to

improve

the

resource

planning process

at the company

.

Step

4

of the 5

-

Step

Critical Thinking

Decision

-

Making

Model.

V

aguely

recommends

how to

improve

the resource

planning process at

the company

or

is

completely off the

topic.

(0

-

7

points)

R

ecommends

how to

improve

the resource

planning

process at

the company

and, for

the most part, fulfills

assignment

requirements.

(

8

points)

R

ecommends

how to

improve

the resource

planning process at

the company

and

demonstrates

a

solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(

9

-

10

points)

Synthesizes

relevant

information and

materials to

provide evidence

of critical

thought.

Synthesizes

in

formation at a

minimal level.

(0

-

7

points)

F

or the most part,

effectively

synthesizes

information, which

supports main ideas.

(

8

points)

C

onsistently and

effectively

synthesizes

information, which

provides strong

support to main

ideas.

(

9

-

10

points)

WEEK 6 BUSINESS BRIEF RUBRIC: FLASHY FLASHERS-MRP

Total of 75 points

Criteria Unacceptable Acceptable Proficient Student Score and

Comments

Develops an

opening

paragraph that

introduces the

case and

identifies the

problem from

Step 1 of the 5-Step

Critical Thinking

Decision-Making

Model.

Vaguely develops an

opening paragraph

that introduces the

case and identifies

the problem or does

not have an opening

paragraph.

(0-7 points)

Develops an opening

paragraph that

introduces the case

and identifies the

problem and, for the

most part, fulfills

assignment

requirements.

(8 points)

Develops an opening

paragraph that

introduces the case

and identifies the

problem and

demonstrates a solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(9-10 points)

Performs a

manual MRP

explosion for the

side lamps.

Step 2 of the 5-Step

Critical Thinking

Decision-Making

Model.

Vaguely performs a

manual MRP

explosion for the

side lamps or does

not complete.

(0-11 points)

Performs a manual

MRP explosion for

the side lamps and,

for the most part,

fulfills assignment

requirements.

(12-13 points)

Performs a manual

MRP explosion for

the side lamps and

demonstrates a solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(14-15 points)

Performs a

manual MRP

explosion for the

headlamps.

Step 2 of the 5-Step

Critical Thinking

Decision-Making

Model.

Vaguely performs a

manual MRP

explosion for the

headlamps or does

not complete.

(0-11 points)

Performs a manual

MRP explosion for

the headlamps and,

for the most part,

fulfills assignment

requirements.

(12-13 points)

Performs a manual

MRP explosion for

the headlamps and

demonstrates a solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(14-15 points)

Discusses the

positive and

negative points

of the MRP

implementation

at the company.

Step 2 of the 5-Step

Critical Thinking

Decision-Making

Model.

Vaguely discusses

the positive and

negative points of

the MRP

implementation at

the company or is

completely off the

topic.

(0-11 points)

Discusses the

positive and negative

points of the MRP

implementation at

the company and, for

the most part, fulfills

assignment

requirements.

(12-13 points)

Discusses the

positive and negative

points of the MRP

implementation at

the company and

demonstrates a solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(14-15 points)

Recommends

how to improve

the resource

planning process

at the company.

Step 4 of the 5-Step

Critical Thinking

Decision-Making

Model.

Vaguely

recommends how to

improve the resource

planning process at

the company or is

completely off the

topic.

(0 -7 points)

Recommends how to

improve the resource

planning process at

the company and, for

the most part, fulfills

assignment

requirements.

(8 points)

Recommends how to

improve the resource

planning process at

the company and

demonstrates a solid

ability to accomplish

the assignment.

(9-10 points)

Synthesizes

relevant

information and

materials to

provide evidence

of critical

thought.

Synthesizes

information at a

minimal level.

(0-7 points)

For the most part,

effectively

synthesizes

information, which

supports main ideas.

(8 points)

Consistently and

effectively

synthesizes

information, which

provides strong

support to main

ideas.

(9-10 points)