Help needed

Criteria

Exemplary 95–100% A

Proficient 80–94%

A- to B

Developing 70–79% C+ to C-

Needs Improvement 0–69% D+ to F

Weight

1. Represent relevant client information from a clinical case study scenario in a biopsychosocial assessment.

Thoroughly represented relevant client information from a clinical case study scenario in a biopsychosocial assessment

Partially represented relevant client information from a clinical case study scenario in a biopsychosocial assessment

Vaguely represented relevant client information from a clinical case study scenario in a biopsychosocial assessment

Did not represent relevant client information from a clinical case study scenario in a biopsychosocial assessment

5%

2. Assess a client in a clinical case study scenario using a biopsychosocial assessment.

Thoroughly assessed a client in a clinical case study scenario using a biopsychosocial assessment

Adequately assessed a client in a clinical case study scenario using a biopsychosocial assessment

Narrowly assessed a client in a clinical case study scenario using a biopsychosocial assessment

Did not assess a client in a clinical case study scenario using a biopsychosocial assessment

10%

3. Diagnose a client in a clinical case study scenario using a diagnostic manual.

Accurately diagnosed a client in a clinical case study scenario using a diagnostic manual

Somewhat accurately diagnosed a client in a clinical case study scenario using a diagnostic manual

Inaccurately diagnosed a client in a clinical case study scenario using a diagnostic manual

Did not diagnose a client in a clinical case study scenario using a diagnostic manual

5%

4. Explain the issues, symptoms, and diagnosis of a client case study according to a theoretical perspective using a case conceptualization.

Thoroughly explained the issues, symptoms, and diagnosis of a client case study according to a theoretical perspective using a case conceptualization

Adequately explained the issues, symptoms, and diagnosis of a client case study according to a theoretical perspective using a case conceptualization

Narrowly explained the issues, symptoms, and diagnosis of a client case study according to a theoretical perspective using a case conceptualization

Did not explain the issues, symptoms, and diagnosis of a client case study according to a theoretical perspective using a case conceptualization

15%

5. Apply a theoretical perspective in a case conceptualization to evaluate a client’s situation.

Insightfully applied a theoretical perspective in a case conceptualization to evaluate a client’s situation

Adequately applied a theoretical perspective in a case conceptualization to evaluate a client’s situation

Narrowly applied a theoretical perspective in a case conceptualization to evaluate a client’s situation

Did not apply a theoretical perspective in a case conceptualization to evaluate a client’s situation

10%

6. Explain treatment options using evidence based practices based on a client diagnosis.

Comprehensively explained treatment options using evidence based practice based on a client diagnosis

Adequately explained treatment options using evidence-based practice based on a client diagnosis

Narrowly explained treatment options using evidence-based practice based on a client diagnosis

Did not explain treatment options using evidencebased practice based on a client diagnosis

15%

7. Identify goals, objectives, and intervention strategies for at least 2 target problems.

Clearly identified goals, objectives, and intervention strategies for at least 2 target problems.

Somewhat clearly identified goals, objectives, and intervention strategies for at least 2 target problems.

Vaguely identified goals, objectives, and intervention strategies for at least 2 target problems

Did not identify goals, objectives, or intervention strategies for at least 2 target problems

20%

8. Support diagnosis and treatment of target problems with relevant information from the DSM-5 and at least 2 peer reviewed sources.

Fully supported diagnosis and treatment of target problems with relevant information from the DSM-5 and at least 2 peer-reviewed sources

Partially supported diagnosis and treatment of target problems with relevant information from the DSM-5 and at least 2 peer-reviewed sources

Minimally supported diagnosis and treatment of target problems with relevant information from the DSM-5 and at least 2 peer-reviewed sources

Did not support diagnosis and treatment of target problems with relevant information from the DSM-5 and at least 2 peer-reviewed sources

10%

9. APA guidelines

Fully formatted according to APA guidelines

Partially formatted according to APA guidelines

Minimally formatted according to APA guidelines

Not formatted according to APA guidelines

5%

10. Use of language, mechanics, punctuation, syntax, and semantics

Writing quality was professional in its use of language, mechanics, punctuation, syntax, and semantics

Writing quality was somewhat professional in its use of language, mechanics, punctuation, syntax, and semantics

Writing quality was narrowly professional in its use of language, mechanics, punctuation, syntax, and semantics

Writing quality was unprofessional in its use of language, mechanics, punctuation, syntax, and semantics

5%