The Role of Jurisdiction and Precedent in Criminal Law
1
Role of Jurisdiction and Precedent in Criminal Law
Meshunna D. Ross
Walden University
CRJS 2003
Professor Gregory Koehle
January 3,2020
This study source was downloaded by 100000800531006 from CourseHero.com on 03-27-2021 12:17:07 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/79120679/Week-5-Assignment-M-Rossdocx/
Th is
stu dy
re so
ur ce
w as
sh ar
ed v
ia C
ou rs
eH er
o. co
m
2
Part One
The state police and the county sheriff department have jurisdiction over the Case of the
Missing tribe Member. The incident occurred within a specific state where the state police and
the county sheriff department has jurisdiction. The state police have a statewide mandate of
initiating law enforcement criminal activity. It also has the authority to perform duties beyond
the county sheriff, such as the enforcement of the traffic laws, managing the state security, and
coordinating the multi-jurisdictional task force activities. Notably, the county sheriff's
department is also responsible for keeping peace and enforcing the law, answerable to citizens in
the respective county and the individual constitution. Therefore, the state police and the county
sheriff department meet the legal and constitutional threshold to take over the missing person
(Lowatcharin & Stallmann, 2017). The two municipalities may not be interested in assuming the
jurisdiction since the case extended to more than fifty miles away from their area of jurisdiction.
The FBI is the ideal agency to take over 'The Case of the Internet Relationship' (14
fourteen-year-old Ana in Colorado and Eric, who lives in New Mexico). The federal law allows
the FBI to investigate federal crimes and collect intelligence to aid other law enforcement
agencies (Osowski, 2018). The case of Ana is associated with cybercrime, where the FBI has full
jurisdiction. The state police have jurisdiction over 'The Case of Cannabis Oil.' Each state has
enacted its law about the use of cannabis, which the investigative officers will be guided in
executing its mandate.
Part Two
'The Case of the Internet Relationship' should be handled by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. Ana is a Colorado resident, while the internet boyfriend (Eric) is a resident of New
This study source was downloaded by 100000800531006 from CourseHero.com on 03-27-2021 12:17:07 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/79120679/Week-5-Assignment-M-Rossdocx/
Th is
stu dy
re so
ur ce
w as
sh ar
ed v
ia C
ou rs
eH er
o. co
m
3
Mexico. The county sheriff department's state police cannot claim the authority of the case since
it outside their area of jurisdiction. The power of the state police is limited within the respective
state. Notably, the incident started on the internet where the FBI has the necessary and federal
authority to carry out the investigation and prosecution of the culprit before a law court.
There is a combination of the federal authority that gives the FBI mandate to take over
the Ana-Eric case. FBI is tasked with using advanced intelligence tools such as surveillance or
recruiting the sources to arrest and prosecute Eric for violation of Ana's fundamental rights and
other applicable laws as enshrined in the supreme law of the land. The Federal Bureau of
Investigation can switch between intelligence collection and action instead of other domestic law
enforcement agencies in other parts of the United States of America. It is also easy for the FBI to
streamline the process of gathering intelligence on the subject (in this case, Eric), learn about the
social activities (Messenger chats), and expedite the arresting process arraigning him before a
competent court of law.
FBI has jurisdiction over a range of crimes (Osowski, 2018). For example, violent crime,
international crime, and other organized crimes fall under its jurisdiction. According to Title 28,
U.S. Code, Section 533, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has the authority to invest crimes
that are not exclusively assigned to either Colorado or the New Mexico state. Title 18, U.S.
Code, section 3052 authorizes the FBI to conduct an investigation, make timely arrests, and
serve court warrants (Sampathkumar, 2020). The authorities' combination makes the FBI the
right and relevant law enforcement agency to track down the criminal activities of Eric (resorting
to manipulative social mechanisms and use of alcohol) to involve a minor in adult activities and
finally kidnap her.
This study source was downloaded by 100000800531006 from CourseHero.com on 03-27-2021 12:17:07 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/79120679/Week-5-Assignment-M-Rossdocx/
Th is
stu dy
re so
ur ce
w as
sh ar
ed v
ia C
ou rs
eH er
o. co
m
4
There is no doubt that Eric is not only a kidnapper but a cyber-criminal; the right area of
interest for the FBI. As a child predator, he relied on the internet to take advantage of the
unsuspecting Ana. He leveraged the best online scheme of victimizing her for his selfish goals.
Therefore, the federal authorities and other legal requirements place the FBI at the center stage of
taking over the criminal investigation until Eric is brought to account. The FBI has the best cyber
strategy for imposing risk and the consequences of any form of cyber adversaries
(Sampathkumar, 2020). FBI has the best tools for changing the behavior of Eric and other
cybercriminals who are focused on preying on the United States' minor citizens. Eric understands
the psychology of the fourteen-year-old Ana. He moved with speed by sharing photos of pets,
selfies, and other personal information contrary to the United States of America's constitution. In
a nutshell, I highly recommend the Federal Bureau of Investigation to take over this matter since
it the best federal agency with full jurisdiction and expertise resources for bringing Eric to
account.
This study source was downloaded by 100000800531006 from CourseHero.com on 03-27-2021 12:17:07 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/79120679/Week-5-Assignment-M-Rossdocx/
Th is
stu dy
re so
ur ce
w as
sh ar
ed v
ia C
ou rs
eH er
o. co
m
5
References
Lowatcharin, G., & Stallmann, J. I. (2017). Developing a Cross-National Index of Police
Decentralization. Social Science Asia, 3(4), 29-53. Retrieved from
https://socialscienceasia.nrct.go.th/index.php/SSAsia/article/view/4
Osowski, K. (2018). Investigating a Serial Killer: The Development of the FBI’s Role Told
Through Public Documents. Step 46, 19.
Sampathkumar, M. (2020). Inside the FBI. Enslow Publishing, LLC. ISBN 9781978507357.
This study source was downloaded by 100000800531006 from CourseHero.com on 03-27-2021 12:17:07 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/79120679/Week-5-Assignment-M-Rossdocx/
Th is
stu dy
re so
ur ce
w as
sh ar
ed v
ia C
ou rs
eH er
o. co
m
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)